Environmental Assessment for the Release of Elk Into the Jarbidge

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Assessment for the Release of Elk Into the Jarbidge Environmental Assessment for the Release of Elk into the Jarbidge Mountains Elko County, Nevada November 1989 Responsible Agencies: USDA, Forest Service Humboldt National Forest 976 Mountain City Highway Elko, Nevada 89801 USDI, Bureau of Land Management Elko District Office P.O. Box 831 Elko, Nevada 89801 Responsible Officials: John Inman. Forest Supervisor Humboldt National Fo~est Rodney Harris Elko District Manager Bureau of Land Management For Further Information Contact: Roderick Howard Jarbidge District Ranger Humboldt National Forest 1008 Burley Ave. Buhl ID 83316 (208) 543-4129 Abstract This Environmental Assessment describes and evaluates alternatives regarding the Nevada Department of Wildlife (NDOW) proposal to release elk into the Jarbidge Mountains. The assessment considers the suitability of the release in relation to existing laws, regulations, and land and resource management plans. The issues. concerns, and opportunities developed through the public scoping process are addressed as they relate to the proposed reestablishment of elk in the Jarbidge Mountains. This document includes assessment of mitigation of impacts that may result from a reestablished elk population. 1 I. INTRODUCTION A. Present Situation, Purpose, and Need for Action: The Nevada Department of Wildlife (NDOW) has submitted to the Humboldt National Forest and the Elko District of the Bureau of Land Management a proposal to reestablish. elk (Cervus elaphus) into the Jarbidge Mountains of northeastern Nevada for the purpose of establishing a resident elk herd therein. The Nevada Department of Wildlife proposes to release 30-50 elk in the East Fork of the Jarbidge River drainage and 30-50 elk in the O'Neil Basin with the intent of establishing an initial population of 250-300 elk in an identified management area of approximately 250,000 acres (see map). All of this management area is historic elk habitat. The initial release date would be during the winter of 1989-1990. Elk reestablishment would provide both consumptive and non-consumptive use to sportsmen and recreationists in Nevada. The Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service have approved land and resource management plans which allow for the reintroduction of elk into habitats suitable and capable of supporting them, with the proviso that conflicts with other resources be resolved and/or appropriate evaluation and analysis be conducted. These documents are the Jarbidge Resource Management Plan, p. II-58, Record of D~cision dated March 23, 1987; the Wells' Resource Management Plan, pp. 10,19 h 20, Record of Decision dated July 16, 1985; the Elko Resource Management Plan, pp. 3,30, Decision Summary dated March 11, 1987; and the Humboldt National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan, pp. IV-5 and IV-73, as approved August 19, 1986. This proposed elk transplant is consistent with direction in these plans. One of the issues raised during scoping was the question if elk are native to the Jarbidge Mountains. This question has significance because ,of the proximity of the Jarbi'dge Wilderness and Forest Service policy not to introduce new species into wilderness areas. Wildlife species that were indigenous to wilderness areas can be reintroduced. Elk are prehistoric. historic, and present inhabitants of the 'Jarbidge Mountains, see "maps on pages 22-24. Archaeological records document that elk occurred in northeastern Nevada in: 1. The Ruby Mountains (Tuohy, Donald R.. "Report to the Forest Supervisor's Office, USDA and to the Secretary, Smithsonian Institution on Archaeologic Research on Public Lands in Wells Ranger District of the Humboldt NAtional Forest. 1972. Nevada State Museum, Carson City, Nevada. 182+ pp.). 2. The Independence Mountains near Carlin at the James Creek Shelter (Robert Elston. Intermountain Research. 1984. "Proposed Data Recovery Activities at the James Creek Shelter «26EU843), Eureka County, Nevada, A Mitigation Proposal Submitted to Carlin Gold Mining Company". Intermountain Research, Drawer A, Silver City, Nevada 89432). 4. Elko at the South Fork Shelter. (Heizer, R.F., M.A. Baumhoff, & C.W. Clewlow Jr. 1968. Archaeology of the South Fork Shelter (NV-EL-ll) Elko County, Nevada. University of California Archaeological Survey Reports, Mo. 71:1-58.) 5. The Cassia Mountains 40 miles east of the Jarbidge Mountains. Pictographs there clearly portray elk. 2 ---- ---- 6. The Deer Creek Cave on the northern Jarbidge Mountain foothills where a fragment of antler belonging to either deer or: elk dating to 3000 BPD was found. (Shutler, R. and M.E. Shutler. 1963. Deer Creek Cave. Elko County. Nevada. Nevada State Museum Anthropological Papers. No. 11. Carson City, Historical records indicate that elk have occured in and around the Jarbidge Mountains. 1. The Elko Shoshoni word for elk is, "padahuya". Had there been no elk in their homeland. they would not likely have had such a word. (Rufus Wood Leigh. Nevada Place Names, Their Origin and Significance. 1964. p. 42.) 2. The Gosiute indian phrase for elk is, "parra hi". Had there been no elk in their homeland, which lay east of the Elko Shoshoni, they would not likely have had such a phrase. (Rufus Wood Leigh. Nevada Place Names, Their Origin and Significance. 1964. p. 42.) 3. Trapper Zena Leonard saw, " ...deer, elk, bear, and beaver plenty.", in the Raft River Valley 100 miles east of the Jarbidge Mountains in 1834 (Fletcher. F.N. Early Nevada -- the Period of Exploration 1776-1848. 1980. Univ. of Nevada Press. 195 pp. p. 89). 4. In 1849 Washington Irving wrote, "The country lying to the southwest of the mountains [around the Great Salt Lake] and ranging clear down to California, was as yet unknown... Still, it was said the deer, the elk. and the big horn were to be found there ... " (Washington Irving. Bonneville's Adventures - revised edition. 1849. p. 61.) 5. Capt. J .H. Simpson in 1859 wrote, "An elk. was seen yesterday in Stevenson's Canon. and one to-day in Red Canon... " These sightings were on the northern end of the Snake Range east of Ely 180 miles southeast of the Jarbidge Mountains. (Capt. J .H. Simpson. Report of Explorations Across the Great Basin of the Territory of Utah for a Direct Wagon-Route from Camp Floyd to Genoa, in Carson Valley in 1859". 1983. Univ. of Nevada Press, Reno NV. 518 pp. p. 121.) 6. An early fur trapper saw elk on the plain near Mountain Home, Idaho (Ross 1855. Vol. 11:93-93) 7. The town and county name, "£Iko" is based on there being, "large droves of elk". in the East Humboldt and Ruby Mountains in 1868 when Elko was the end-of-construction station for the Central Pacific Railroad. These elk were hunted to provide meat for the railroad construction crews. (Rufus Wood Leigh. Nevada Place Names, Their Origin and Significance. 1964. pp. 42-43.) 8. Elk were extirpated from the Goose Creek mountains fifty miles east of the Jarbidge Mountains in the 1880's. (Walgamott, C.S.. 1936. Six Decades Back. Caxton Printers, Caldwell, Idaho. 358 pp. p. 35.) 9. McConnell states, "During the period of first settlement big game was reported to be plentiful in what is now the Cassia Division [50 miles east of the Jarbidge Mountains] elk were present ... " (Burt R. McConnell. "A Productivity Study of Mule Deer on the Cassia Division of the Sawtooth National Forest". 1957. M.S. Thesis University of Idaho. 75 pp., p. 12)) 3 10. F.H. Winter wrote that in 1891 near the present town of Jarbidge he and a small group of prospectors, " ...climbed high peaks, hunted, fished the streams; saw bear, cougar, mountain sheep and deer in abundance. There were a lot of elk tracks. It (H. Hickson. "Letters from·- Jarbidge". in- Northeastern Nevada Historical Society Quarterly. Spring, 1978 [78-2]. p.49). 11. "Elk were seldom found on the arid plains but roamed largely in and near the mountain ranges being recorded in and near the Bruneau and Elk I-lountains." (Murie, A. 1951. The Elk of North America. The Stackpole Co., Harrisburg, PA. 376 pp. p. 24). 12. Field notes written by A. K. Fisher report seven elk in the Bruneau Mountains near Mountain City in 1898 (Murie. Ibid. p.32) 13. Dr. C. Hart Merriam's field diaries record elk having inhabited, " ...the pine areas of the mountains above Charleston." (Murie, Ibid.) 14. Q. David ffansen, District Ranger on the Jarbidge Ranger District in the 1930's, reported that a prospector named Bill Austin killed an elk prior to the 1930's near Sugar Loaf, east of Jackpot, Nevada. 15. 15-20 elk were seen near Elk Mountain in the late 1930's.(La Dell Handy, personal communication through John Erickson). 16. Jack Wilcox, District Ranger on the Jarbidge Ranger District during the 1950' s found shed elk antlers on Biroth Ridge and elk tracks and droppings near God's Pocket Peak' (personal communication through Mike Wickersham). 17. In the spring of 1959, twenty-two elk were seen' at the head of Canyon Creek by Joe Baranaga (ibid.). 18. In the fall of .1959 State t+apper Harry Elliot saw a bull elk in the head of Caudle Creek. 19. Ex-District Ranger Tom Ramsey reports that seven elk were killed on the Jarbidge Ranger District in the 1970' s (personal communication through Don Oman) . 20. The Jarbidge mountains are shown to be inhabited by elk in a 1978 distribution map. (Wildlife Management Institute. 1978. Big Game of North America. Ecology and Management. Stackpole Books. Harrisburg PA17105. 494 pp. p. 13.) 21. The Jarbidge Mountains are mapped as well within the historic range of the Nelson subspecies of elk (E. Raymond Hall. The Mammals of North America. 1981. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NY NY. 1181 pp: p. 1085-1087). 22. The Jarbidge Mountains are shown to be inhabited by elk prehistorically and as of 1982 in the authoritative book Elk of North America: Ecology and Management.
Recommended publications
  • Julia's Unequivocal Nevada Klampout
    Julia's Unequivocal Nevada Klampout #35 JARBIDGE clamper year 6019 Brought to you by Julia C. Bulette chapter 1864, E Clampus Vitus Researched and interpreted by Jeffrey D. Johnson XNGH, Clamphistorian at chapter 1864 Envisioned by Noble Grand Humbug Bob Stransky Dedicated to Young Golddigging Widders and Old Orphans 2014 c.e. Why Why yes, Jarbidge is a ''fer piece'' from any place. This year's junk trip has the unique quirk that it is not in the Great Basin like the rest of our territory. Northern Elko County is drained by the tributaries of the Owyhee, Bruneau and Jarbidge Rivers. They flow in to the Snake River and out to the sea. To the South the range is drained by the North Fork of the Humboldt and in the East, St. Mary's River. Geology The North American Continental plate moves at a rate of one inch a year in a Southwesterly direction. Underneath the plate is a volcanic hotspot or mantle plume. 10 to 12 million years ago the hotspot was just North of the Idaho border. Over that time it has moved, leaving a trail of volcanic debris and ejectamenta from McDermitt Nevada, East. Now the Yellowstone Caldera area is over the plume. During the middle and late Miocene, a sequence of ash flows, enormous lava flows and basalt flows from 40 odd shield volcanoes erupted from the Bruneau-Jarbidge caldera. The eruptive center has mostly been filled in by lava flows and lacustrine and fluvial sediments. Two hundred Rhinos, five different species of horse, three species of cameloids, saber tooth deer and other fauna at Ashfall Fossil Beds 1000 miles downwind to the East in Nebraska, were killed by volcanic ash from the Bruneau Jarbidge Caldera.
    [Show full text]
  • Jarbidge Mountains (Updated 2014)
    Site Description Jarbidge Mountains (updated 2014) Geologic setting: The Jarbidge Mountains are located within the northeastern portion of Elko County, Nevada. The small mountain range is located between the Copper Mountains to the west and the Snake mountains to the east and southeast. Basement rocks of the Jarbidge quadrangle include schist, quartzite, hornfels, and limestones. These are intruded by a Cretaceous quartz monzonite stock. The basement rocks are displaced along pre-Cretaceous faults. Cambrian and Precambrian rocks are thrust over and upon Paleozoic sedimentary rocks. The early Tertiary volcanics and conglomerates are displaced along normal faults represented by the Copper Creek fault, which dips gently east. The Jarbidge Rhyolite (Miocene) and all older formations are displaced along three sets of faults that dip steeply: one set strikes northward, one northeast, and one northwest. These three sets of faults are locally mineralized (Smith, 1976). The oldest exposures are sedimentary deposits such as limestones and shale towards the western portion of the area (Scott, 1910). Geothermal features: Gray Rock Mine: The Great Basin Groundwater Geochemical Database lists a measurement of 26.7°C in an abandoned mineshaft well in the Gray Rock Mine (Sec. 24, T45N, R58E). Robinson Hole Hot Spring / Murphy Hot Spring / Kitties Hot Hole: (Sec. 29, T47N, R59E) The first acknowledged proprietor was Kittie Wilkins, who diverted river water to create the Kittie’s Hot Hole soaking pool (1885). Patrick Murphy developed a small resort on the property in the early 1900’s and renamed it Murphy Hot Spring, followed by Harry Showalter, who added a swimming pool and changing rooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain City, Ruby Mountains, and Jarbidge Combined Travel
    Mountain City, Ruby Mountains and Jarbidge Ranger Districts Combined Travel Management Project Environmental Impact Statement Chapter 3. Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences 3.1. Introduction This chapter summarizes the physical, biological, social, and economic environments that are affected by the alternatives and the effects on that environment that would result from implementation of any of the alternatives. This chapter also presents the scientif ic and analyt ical basis for comparison of the alternatives presented in chapter 2. 3.1.1. Analysis Process Most of the data used in the following analysis are from the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest corporate GIS layers. There is a certain amount of error in the location and alignments included in this GIS data. For example, the road layer overlying the stream layer may show more stream crossings than actually exist on the ground because of the different sources from which the different layers were obtained. Some perennial streams may show up on the map as being intermittent. This may also create some inaccuracies as to the exact location and extent of riparian zones. The Forest is constantly working to improve map accuracies and the corporate GIS layers. For the purposes of this analysis, the best data that is available was used. The data in the tables below and in the project record depict with a reasonable amount of accuracy what would be occurring on the ground for each alternative, within the limitations described above. The changes between alternatives remain relative to each other. 3.1.2. Cumulative Effects According to the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) National Environmental Protection Ac t (NEPA) regulations, “cumulative impact” is the impact on the environment which results from the incremental impact of the action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of what agency (federal or non-federal) or person undertakes such actions (40 CFR 1508.7).
    [Show full text]
  • Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout (Salvelinus Confluentus) Cover Illustration by Kendal Morris, U.S
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Cover illustration by Kendal Morris, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; used with permission. Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) (May 2004) Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Manager, California/Nevada Operations Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and, in this case, with the assistance of recovery teams, State, Federal, and Tribal agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Director, Regional Director, or Manager, as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. Literature citation of this document should read as follows: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Jarbidge River Watershed Analysis
    JARBIDGE RIVER WATERSHED ANALYSIS JARBIDGE RANGER DISTRICT HUMBOLDT-TOIYABE NATIONAL FORESTS ANALYSIS CORE TEAM: MICHAEL E. MCNEILL, TEAM LEADER JAY FREDERICK, BIOLOGIST BONNIE WHALEN, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST TEAMMEMBERS: Chris Butler, Hydrologist Fred Frampton, Archaeologist Kathy Ramsey, Fish Biologist· Additional Inputprovided by: Gary Johnson, Nevada Division of Wildlife, Region II Jim K1ott, Jarbidge Resource Area, Idaho .BLM Bruce ZoeUick,Idaho State BLM JARBIDGE CANYON WATERSHED ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE - CHARACTERIZATION OF THE WATERSHED Introduction . Page 1-1 Physical Setting Page 1-2 Geology Page 1-3 Soils Page 1-4 Disturbance Page 1-5 Biological Processes and Human Influence Page 1-5 CHAPTER TWO - /DENT/FICA T/ON OF ISSUES AND KEY QUESTIONS Key Questions Page 2-1 CHAPTER THREE - DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT CONDITIONS Stream Order Page 3-1 Hydrologic Regime Page 3-1 Headwater Morphology Page 3-1 Valley Bottom Morphology Page 3-1 Channel Morphology Page 3-2 Substrate Page Width/Depth Ratio Page 3-5 Pools and large Wood 3-5 Water Quality· Page 3-7 Heavy Metals Page 3-7 Temperature Page 3-7 Other Water Quality Concerns Page 3-10 Soils Page 3-10 Vegetation Page 3-10 Riparian Vegetation Page 3-12 Macros Page 3-12 CHAPTER FOUR - DESCRIPTION OF REFERENCE CONDITIONS Biological Processes and Human Influence . Page 4-1 Beaver Page 4-1 Livestock Page 4-2 Mining Page 4-5 Mining and Water quality Page 4-5 Temperature Page 4-6 Roads Page 4-6 Vegetation Page 4-7 Channel Morphology Page 4-8 CHAPTER FIVE - SYNTHESIS AND INTERPRETATION OF INFORMATION Summary Page 5.1 CHAPTER SIX - RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations Page 6.1 Data Shortcomings Page 6.2 DATA CHARTS AND GIS OVERLAYS Data Charts: Geologic Formations Figure 1.2' Valley Boltom Gradient Figure 3.1 Stream Reach.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Movement of Bull Trout in the Upper Jarbidge River Watershed, Nevada
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Distribution and Movement of Bull Trout in the Upper Jarbidge River Watershed, Nevada Open-File Report 2010-1033 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Distribution and Movement of Bull Trout in the Upper Jarbidge River Watershed, Nevada By M. Brady Allen, Patrick J. Connolly, Matthew G. Mesa, Jodi Charrier, and Chris Dixon Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Open-File Report 2010–1033 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Allen, M.B., Connolly, P.J., Mesa, M.G., Charrier, Jodi, and Dixon, Chris, 2010, Distribution and movement of bull trout in the upper Jarbidge River watershed, Nevada: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1033, 80 p. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recovery Plan for Jarbidge Population of Bull Trout
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Cover illustration by Kendal Morris, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; used with permission. Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) (May 2004) Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Manager, California/Nevada Operations Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Draft Recovery Plan for the Jarbidge River Distinct Population Segment of Bull Trout DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and, in this case, with the assistance of recovery teams, State, Federal, and Tribal agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Director, Regional Director, or Manager, as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. Literature citation of this document should read as follows: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Nevada Forest Conditions Report
    United States Department Forest Pest Conditions in of Agriculture Nevada 2010 Forest Service State and Private Forestry Forest Health Protection Intermountain Region R4-OFO-TR-05-00 State of Nevada Division of Forestry Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Front cover photos: (Top) Whitebark pine killed by mountain pine beetle in the Jarbidge Mountains looking down toward the town of Jarbidge, NV, July 2010 (Photo: Gail Durham); (Bottom) Pinyon pine sawfly and needle scale damage on the northeast side of the Monitor Range, August, 2009 (Photo: Gail Durham) Forest Health Specialists Forest Health Protection USDA Forest Service Valerie DeBlander, Forestry Ogden Field Office Technician Forest Health Protection Email: [email protected] 4746 S 1900 E Ogden, UT 84403 John Guyon II, Pathologist Email: [email protected] Phone: 801-476-9720 FAX: 801-479-1477 Elizabeth Hebertson, Entomologist/Pathologist Steve Munson, Group Leader Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Laura Dunning, Program Assistant Darren Blackford, Entomologist Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Nevada Division of Forestry Department of Conservation and Natural Resources State Headquarters 2478 Fairview Dr. Carson City, NV 89701 Gail Durham, Forest Health Specialist Email: [email protected] Phone: 775-684-2513 John Christopherson, Resource Program Manager Email: [email protected] Phone: 775-684-2507 ii Compiled by: Gail Durham, Forest Health Specialist, NDF DCNR Edited by Elizabeth Hebertson With Contributions from: Dick Halsey, USFS FHP GIS Sp e c i a l i st John Guyon II, USFS FHP Pathologist Jeff Knight, Nevada State Entomologist Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Nevada Forest Pest Conditions Report
    United States Department Of Agriculture Forest Service State and Private Forestry Forest Health Protection Intermountain Region R4-OFO-TR-05-00 State of Nevada Division of Forestry Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Aspen defoliation on top of Table Mountain in the Monitor Range in Central NV, August, 2012 (photo by Gail Durham, NDF) 2012 Forest Pest Conditions In Nevada White satin moth defoliation of aspen in North Canyon above Lake Tahoe in early September 2012. Forest Health Specialists Forest Health Protection Nevada Division of USDA Forest Service Forestry Ogden Field Office Department of Conservation Forest Health Protection and Natural Resources 4746 S 1900 E State Headquarters Ogden, UT 84403 2478 Fairview Dr. Phone: 801-476-9720 Carson City, NV 89701 FAX: 801-479-1477 Gail Durham, Forest Health Specialist Steve Munson, Group Leader Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Phone: 775-849-2500 Ext..241 Darren Blackford, Entomologist Email: [email protected] John Christopherson, Resource Danielle Reboletti, Entomologist Program Manager Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Valerie DeBlander, Forestry Technician Phone: 775-684-2507 Email: [email protected] John Guyon II, Pathologist Email: [email protected] Elizabeth Hebertson, Entomologist/Pathologist Email: [email protected] Laura Dunning, Program Assistant Email: [email protected] 2 Compiled by: Gail Durham, Forest Health Specialist, NDF DCNR Edited by Danielle Reboletti, USFS, Entomologist With Contributions from: Dick Halsey, USFS FHP GIS Specialist John Guyon II, USFS FHP Pathologist Jeff Knight, Nevada State Entomologist Dr. Shouhua Wang, Nevada State Pathologist April 2013 ii Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Bruneau Subbasin Summary
    Draft Bruneau Subbasin Summary May 17, 2002 Prepared for the Northwest Power Planning Council Subbasin Team Leader Carol Perugini, Shoshone-Paiute Tribes Writing Team Members Darin Saul, ecovista Anne Davidson, ecovista Craig Rabe, ecovista Contributors Bureau of Land Management, Elko Resource Area Bureau of Land Management, Jarbidge Resource Area Bureau of Land Management, Bruneau Resource Area Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Idaho Department of Fish and Game Nevada Division of Wildlife Owyhee County Commissioners Shoshone-Paiute Tribes The Nature Conservancy DRAFT: This document has not yet been reviewed or approved by the Northwest Power Planning Council Bruneau Subbasin Summary Table of Contents Introduction........................................................................................................................................ 1 Subbasin Description ......................................................................................................................... 3 General Description ................................................................................................................... 3 Fish and Wildlife Resources............................................................................................................ 30 Fish and Wildlife Status........................................................................................................... 30 Habitat Areas and Quality.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Bureau of Mines
    NEVADA BUREAU OF MINES Vernon E. Scheid, Director BULLETIN 67 GEOLOGY OF THE ROWLAND QUADRANGLE, ELK0 COUNTY, NEVADA BY Kent Bushnell MACKAY SCHOOL OF MINES UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA Reno, Nevada 1967 CONTENTS PAGE Foreword .............................................................................................................. v Abstract ................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 Location and accessibility.............................................................................. 1 Previous work .............................................................................................. 1 Present work and acknowledgments.............................................................. 3 Geography............................................................................................................ 3 Physical features ............................................................................................ 3 Climate. vegetation. and culture .................................................................... Paleozoic stratigraphy........................................................................................... Regional setting............................................................................................ Local setting.................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Humboldt National Forest
    HISTORY OF THE HUMBOLDT NATIONAL FOREST By Fred P. Frampton Humboldt National Forest Cultural Resource Series #1 June 1992 Reformatted July 2008 HISTORY OF THE HUMBOLDT NATIONAL FOREST By Fred P. Frampton Humboldt National Forest Cultural Resource Series #1 June 1992 Reformatted July 2008 Edited by Judith Frampton Cover Design by Robin Nunez TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY OVERVIEW.............................................................................................................................................2 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE HUMBOLDT NATIONAL FOREST...................................................................................5 CONSOLIDATION OF THE HUMBOLDT NATIONAL FOREST ...................................................................................6 HISTORY OF THE DISTRICTS.............................................................................................................................................6 D-1, MOUNTAIN CITY.........................................................................................................................................................6 D-2, RUBY MOUNTAINS DISTRICT ..................................................................................................................................9 D-3, JARBIDGE DISTRICT.................................................................................................................................................12 D-4, ELY DISTRICT............................................................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]