DOCSLIB.ORG

GREATER ROADRUNNER (Geococcyx Californianus) CARE MANUAL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GREATER ROADRUNNER (Geococcyx Californianus) CARE MANUAL GREATER ROADRUNNER (Geococcyx californianus) CARE MANUAL CREATED BY THE AZA Greater Roadrunner Species Survival Plan® IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE AZA Turaco/Cuckoo Taxon Advisory Group Greater Roadrunner (Geococcyx californianus) Care Manual Greater Roadrunner (Geococcyx californianus) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in collaboration with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Greater Roadrunner Species Survival Plan. (2016). Greater Roadrunner (Geococcyx californianus) Care Manual. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Original Completion Date: July 2016 Authors and Significant Contributors: Sara Hallager, Greater Roadrunner SSP Coordinator, Smithsonian National Zoological Park, USA Carol M. Bradford, M.S., DVM, Dipl. ACZM, Albuquerque BioPark, USA Shelly Collinsworth, Fort Worth Zoo, USA Mike Maslanka, Smithsonian National Zoological Park, USA Peter Shannon, Albuquerque Biological Park, USA Audrey Siegrist, DVM, Arizona Sonora Desert Museum, USA Reviewers: Joe Barkowski, Tulsa Zoo, USA Willeke Huizinga, Burgers Zoo, The Netherlands Marleen Giesen, Burgers Zoo, The Netherlands AZA Staff Editors: Felicia Spector, Program Assistant, Animal Programs Rebecca Greenberg, Conservation and Science Coordinator Candice Dorsey, PhD, Vice President, Animal Programs Debborah Luke, PhD, Senior Vice President, Conservation and Science Haley Gordon, AZA Conservation and Science Intern Cover Photo Credits: John Kiseda Disclaimer: This manual presents a compilation of knowledge provided by recognized animal experts based on the current science, practice, and technology of animal management. The manual assembles basic requirements, best practices, and animal care recommendations to maximize capacity for excellence in animal care and welfare. The manual should be considered a work in progress, since practices continue to evolve through advances in scientific knowledge. The use of information within this manual should be in accordance with all local, state, and federal laws and regulations concerning the care of animals. While some government laws and regulations may be referenced in this manual, these are not all-inclusive nor is this manual intended to serve as an evaluation tool for those agencies. The recommendations included are not meant to be exclusive management approaches, diets, medical treatments, or procedures, and may require adaptation to meet the specific needs of individual animals and particular circumstances in each institution. Commercial entities and media identified are not necessarily endorsed by AZA. The statements presented throughout the body of the manual do not represent AZA standards of care unless specifically identified as such in clearly marked sidebar boxes. Association of Zoos and Aquariums 2 Greater Roadrunner (Geococcyx californianus) Care Manual Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Taxonomic Classification ...................................................................................................................... 5 Genus, Species, and Status ................................................................................................................. 5 General Information ............................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 1. Ambient Environment ........................................................................................................ 8 1.1 Temperature and Humidity ............................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Light ................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Water and Air Quality ...................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Sound and Vibration ....................................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 2. Habitat Design and Containment .................................................................................. 11 2.1 Space and Complexity .................................................................................................................. 11 2.2 Safety and Containment ............................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 3. Records ................................................................................................................................ 16 3.1 Definitions ....................................................................................................................................... 16 3.2 Types of Records .......................................................................................................................... 16 3.3 Permit Considerations .................................................................................................................. 17 3.4 Identification ................................................................................................................................... 17 Chapter 4. Transport ............................................................................................................................. 19 4.1 Preparations ................................................................................................................................... 19 4.2 Protocols ......................................................................................................................................... 20 Chapter 5. Social Environment ........................................................................................................... 22 5.1 Group Structure and Size ............................................................................................................ 22 5.2 Influence of Others and Conspecifics ........................................................................................ 22 5.3 Introductions and Reintroductions .............................................................................................. 23 Chapter 6. Nutrition ............................................................................................................................... 24 6.1 Nutritional Requirements .............................................................................................................. 24 6.2 Diets ................................................................................................................................................ 26 6.3 Nutritional Evaluations .................................................................................................................. 27 Chapter 7. Veterinary Care .................................................................................................................. 28 7.1 Veterinary Services ....................................................................................................................... 28 7.2 Transfer Examination and Diagnostic Testing Recommendations ........................................ 29 7.3 Quarantine ...................................................................................................................................... 30 7.4 Preventive Medicine ...................................................................................................................... 32 7.5 Capture, Restraint, and Immobilization ...................................................................................... 34 7.6 Management of Diseases, Disorders, Injuries and/or Isolation.............................................. 34 Chapter 8. Reproduction ...................................................................................................................... 40 8.1 Reproductive Physiology and Behavior ..................................................................................... 40 8.2 Assisted Reproductive Technology ............................................................................................ 41 8.3 Egg-laying/ Parturition .................................................................................................................. 42 8.4 Hatching Facilities ......................................................................................................................... 44 8.5 Assisted Rearing ........................................................................................................................... 45 8.6 Contraception ................................................................................................................................. 48 Chapter 9. Behavior Management ..................................................................................................... 49 9.1 Animal Training .............................................................................................................................. 49 9.2 Environmental Enrichment ........................................................................................................... 50 Association of Zoos and Aquariums 3 Greater Roadrunner (Geococcyx californianus) Care Manual 9.3 Staff and Animal Interactions ...................................................................................................... 52 9.4
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maya Knowledge and "Science Wars"
    Journal of Ethnobiology 20(2); 129-158 Winter 2000 MAYA KNOWLEDGE AND "SCIENCE WARS" E. N. ANDERSON Department ofAnthropology University ofCalifornia, Riverside Riverside, CA 92521~0418 ABSTRACT.-Knowledge is socially constructed, yet humans succeed in knowing a great deal about their environments. Recent debates over the nature of "science" involve extreme positions, from claims that allscience is arbitrary to claims that science is somehow a privileged body of truth. Something may be learned by considering the biological knowledge of a very different culture with a long record of high civilization. Yucatec Maya cthnobiology agrees with contemporary international biological science in many respects, almost all of them highly specific, pragmatic and observational. It differs in many other respects, most of them highly inferential and cosmological. One may tentatively conclude that common observation of everyday matters is more directly affected by interaction with the nonhuman environment than is abstract deductive reasoning. but that social factors operate at all levels. Key words: Yucatec Maya, ethnoornithology, science wars, philosophy ofscience, Yucatan Peninsula RESUMEN.-EI EI conocimiento es una construcci6n social, pero los humanos pueden aprender mucho ce sus alrededores. Discursos recientes sobre "ciencia" incluyen posiciones extremos; algunos proponen que "ciencia" es arbitrario, otros proponen que "ciencia" es verdad absoluto. Seria posible conocer mucho si investiguemos el conocimiento biol6gico de una cultura, muy difcrente, con una historia larga de alta civilizaci6n. EI conodrniento etnobiol6gico de los Yucatecos conformc, mas 0 menos, con la sciencia contemporanea internacional, especial mente en detallas dcrivadas de la experiencia pragmatica. Pero, el es deferente en otros respectos-Ios que derivan de cosmovisi6n 0 de inferencia logical.
    [Show full text]
  • CATALINA CALIFORNIA QUAIL (Callipepla Californica Catalinensis) Paul W
    II SPECIES ACCOUNTS Andy Birch PDF of Catalina California Quail account from: Shuford, W. D., and Gardali, T., editors. 2008. California Bird Species of Special Concern: A ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California. Studies of Western Birds 1. Western Field Ornithologists, Camarillo, California, and California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. California Bird Species of Special Concern CATALINA CALIFORNIA QUAIL (Callipepla californica catalinensis) Paul W. Collins Criteria Scores Population Trend 0 Santa Range Trend 0 Barbara County Population Size 7.5 Range Size 10 Ventura Endemism 10 County Population Concentration 10 Threats 0 Los San Miguel Is. Santa Cruz Is. Angeles County Anacapa Is. Santa Rosa Is. Santa Barbara Is. Santa Catalina Is. San Nicolas Is. San Clemente Is. Current Year-round Range Historic Year-round Range County Boundaries Kilometers 20 10 0 20 Current and historic (ca. 1944) year-round range of the Catalina California Quail. Birds from Santa Catalina Island (perhaps brought by Native Americans) later introduced successfully to Santa Rosa (1935–1940) and Santa Cruz (late 1940s) islands, but unsuccessfully to San Nicolas Island (1962); quail from mainland populations of C. c. californica introduced unsuccessfully to Santa Cruz (prior to 1875) and San Clemente (late 19th century, 1913) islands. Catalina California Quail Studies of Western Birds 1:107–111, 2008 107 Studies of Western Birds No. 1 SPECIAL CONCERN PRIORITY HISTORIC RANGE AND ABUNDANCE Currently considered a Bird Species of Special IN CALIFORNIA Concern (year round), priority 3. This subspecies Grinnell and Miller (1944) described the Catalina was not included on prior special concern lists California Quail as a “common to abundant” (Remsen 1978, CDFG 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Predictability and Host Specificity in Fleas
    81 Resource predictability and host specificity in fleas: the effect of host body mass B. R. KRASNOV1*, S. MORAND2,D.MOUILLOT3,G.I.SHENBROT1, I. S. KHOKHLOVA4 and R. POULIN5 1 Ramon Science Center and Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 194, Mizpe Ramon 80600, Israel 2 Center for Biology and Management of Populations, Campus International de Baillarguet, CS 30016 34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez cedex, France 3 UMR CNRS-UMII 5119 Ecosystemes Lagunaires, University of Montpellier II, CC093, FR-34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France 4 Desert Animals Adaptations and Husbandry, Wyler Department of Dryland Agriculture, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel 5 Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand (Received 22 November 2005; revised 28 December 2005; accepted 24 January 2006; first published online 28 March 2006) SUMMARY Ecological specialization is hypothesized to result from the exploitation of predictable resource bases. For parasitic organisms, one prediction is that parasites of large-bodied host species, which tend to be long-lived, should specialize on these hosts, whereas parasites of small host species, which represent more ephemeral and less predictable resources, should become generalists. We tested this prediction by quantifying the association between the level of host specificity of fleas and the mean body mass of their mammalian hosts, using published data from 2 large, distinct geographical regions (South Africa and northern North America). In general, we found supporting evidence that flea host specificity, measured either as the number of host species exploited or their taxonomic distinctness, became more pronounced with increasing host body mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Shape As a Generic Character in the Cardinals
    BILL SHAPE AS A GENERIC CHARACTER IN THE CARDINALS WALTER J. BOCK ANY genera in birds and other animal groups have been based essentially M upon a single character. This character may be a single morphological feature, such as the presence or absence of the hallux, or it may be a complex of characters which are all closely correlated functionally, such as the bones, muscles, and ligaments of the jaw apparatus. The validity of many of these genera has been questioned in recent years with the general acceptance of the polytypic species concept and the increasing acknowledgment of the grouping service at low taxonomic levels provided by the genus. An example is the North American passerine genus Pyrrhuloxia, which is distinguished from Richmondena essentially on the basis of bill shape. The overall similarity of Pyrrhuloxia sinuata to the two species of Richmondena in morphology and in general life history (Gould, 1961) has led several recent authors to synony- mize Richmondena with Pyrrhuloxia. Other workers have maintained the validity of the generic separation, basing their decision largely on the dif- ference in bill shape. The object of this paper is to ascertain the importance of this difference as a taxonomic character and whether the difference if con- firmed is of generic significance. THE JAW APPARATUS Ridgway (19013624-625) described the bill of P. sinuata (see Figs. 1 and 2) as follows: “Bill very short, thick and deep, with culmen strongly convex and maxillary tomium deeply and angularly incised a little posterior to the middle
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Entomological Society
    Royal Entomological Society HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS To purchase current handbooks and to download out-of-print parts visit: http://www.royensoc.co.uk/publications/index.htm This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Copyright © Royal Entomological Society 2012 ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL , SOCIETY OF LONDON Vol. I. Part 1 (). HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS SIPHONAPTERA 13y F. G. A. M. SMIT LONDON Published by the Society and Sold at its Rooms - 41, Queen's Gate, S.W. 7 21st June, I9S7 Price £1 os. od. ACCESSION NUMBER ....... ................... British Entomological & Natural History Society c/o Dinton Pastures Country Park, Davis Street, Hurst, OTS - Reading, Berkshire RG 10 OTH .•' Presented by Date Librarian R EGULATIONS I.- No member shall be allowed to borrow more than five volumes at a time, or to keep any of tbem longer than three months. 2.-A member shall at any time on demand by the Librarian forthwith return any volumes in his possession. 3.-Members damaging, losing, or destroying any book belonging to the Society shall either provide a new copy or pay such sum as tbe Council shall tbink fit. ) "1' > ) I .. ··•• · ·• "V>--· .•. .t ... -;; ·· · ·- ~~- -~· · · ····· · · { · · · l!i JYt.11'ian, ,( i-es; and - REGU--LATIONS dthougll 1.- Books may b - ~dapted, ; ~ 2 -~ . e borrowed at . !.l :: - --- " . ~ o Member shall b . all Meeflfll(s of the So J t Volumes at a time o; ,IJJowed to borrow more c e y . 3.- An y Mem ber r t '. to keep them lonl{er th than three b.ecorn_e SPecified f e a Jn!ng a \'oJume a n one m on th.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the Mendocino National Forest Compiled by Chuck Vaughn, Jerry White, and David Woodward Updated June 2007
    Birds of the Mendocino National Forest compiled by Chuck Vaughn, Jerry White, and David Woodward updated June 2007 (R) Resident; (SV) Summer Visitor; (WV) Winter Visitor; (T) Transient, (M) Migrant Common Name Scientific Name Snow Goose Chen caerulescens (M) Mallard Anas platyrhynchos (R) Wood Duck Aix sponsa (R) Common Merganser Mergus merganser (R) Sooty Grouse Dendragapus fuliginosus (R) Wild Turkey Meleagris gallopavo (R and SV) Mountain Quail Oreortyx pictus (R) California Quail Callipepla californica (R) Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura (R and SV) Osprey Pandion haliaetus (SV) Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus (WV) Northern Harrier Circus cyaneus (SV and WV) Sharp-shinned Hawk Accipiter striatus (R and WV) Cooper's Hawk Accipiter cooperii (R and WV) Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis (R) Swainson's Hawk Buteo swainsoni (T) Red-tailed Hawk Buteo jamaicensis (R) Rough-legged Hawk Buteo lagopus (WV) Golden Eagle Aguila chrysaetos (R) American Kestrel Falco sparverius (R) Merlin Falco columbarius (WV) Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus (R) Prairie Falcon Falco mexicanus (WV) Killdeer Charadrius vociferous (R) Spotted Sandpiper Actitis macularia (R and SV) Band-tailed Pigeon Columba fasciata (R and WV) Mourning Dove Zenaida macroura (R and SV) Greater Roadrunner Geococcyx californianus (R) Barn Owl Tyto alba (R) Flammulated Owl Otus flammeolus (SV) Western Screech-Owl Otus kennicottii (R) Great Horned Owl Bubo virginianus (R) Northern Pygmy-Owl Glaucidium gnoma (R) Spotted Owl Strix occidentalis (R) Long-eared Owl Asio otus (SV) Northern
    [Show full text]
  • Roadrunner Fact Sheet
    Roadrunner Fact Sheet Common Name: Roadrunner Scientific Name: Geococcyx Californianus & Geococcyx Velox Wild Status: Not Threatened Habitat: Arid dessert and shrub Country: United States, Mexico, and Central America Shelter: These birds nest 1-3 meters off the ground in low trees, shrubs, or cactus Life Span: 8 years Size: 2 feet in length; 8-15 ounces Details The genus Geococcyx consists of two species of bird: the greater roadrunner and the lesser roadrunner. They live in the arid climates of Southwestern United States, Mexico, and Central America. Though these birds can fly, they spend most of their time running from shrub to shrub. Roadrunners spend the entirety of their day hunting prey and dodging predators. It's a tough life out there in the wild! These birds eat insects, small reptiles and mammals, arachnids, snails, other birds, eggs, fruit, and seeds. One thing that these birds do not have to worry about is drinking water. They intake enough moisture through their diet and are able to secrete any excess salt build-up through glands in their eyes. This adaptation is common in sea birds as their main source of hydration is the ocean. The fact that roadrunners have adapted this trait as well goes to show how well they are suited for their environment. A roadrunner will mate for life and will travel in pairs, guarding their territory from other roadrunners. When taking care of the nest, both male and female take turns incubating eggs and caring for their young. The young will leave the nest after a couple weeks and will then learn foraging techniques for a few days until they are left to fend for themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Aves: Cuculidae)
    Bol. Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat. Parag. Vol. 19, nº 2 (Dic. 2015): 58-61100-100 OBSERVATIONS OF NOVEL FEEDING TACTICS IN GUIRA CUCKOO GUIRA GUIRA (AVES: CUCULIDAE) P. Smith1,2 1Fauna Paraguay, Encarnación, Itapúa, Paraguay. www.faunaparaguay.com. E-mail: [email protected] 2Para La Tierra, Reserva Natural Laguna Blanca, San Pedro, Paraguay. Abstract.- Two unusual feeding observations by Guira Cuckoo Guira guira (Cuculidae) are reported. The birds were seen to raid the closed nests of the butterfly Brassolis sophorae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), and also to take cicadas (Auchenorrhyncha) that had become trapped in a mist-net. Key words: Auchenorrhyncha, Brassolis sophorae, foraging, Nymphalidae, Paraguay. Resumen.- Se reportan dos observaciones de comportamiento de forrajeo poco usual para la Piririta Guira guira (Cu- culidae). Las aves fueron observados saqueando los nidos cerrados de la mariposa Brassolis sophorae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), y tambien a depredar chicharras (Auchenorrhyncha) que habían quedado atrapados en redes de niebla. Palabras clave: Auchenorrhyncha, Brassolis sophorae, forrageo, Nymphalidae, Paraguay. The Guira Cuckoo Guira guira (Gmelin, 1798) valho et al., 1998). The social larvae (Fig. 1) is a widespread socially-breeding cuculid feed nocturnally on palms (Arecaceae) and are (Macedo, 1992, 1994; Macedo & Bianchi, 1997) considered agricultural pests because of their found throughout eastern South America from tendency to completely defoliate the plants upon northeastern Brazil to south-central Argentina which they feed (Cleare, 1915; Rai, 1971). The (Payne, 2005). In Paraguay it is a common and larvae take refuge by day in large communal familiar species, occurring in open areas in silk nests, interwoven within the palm leaves small, noisy flocks of 6 to 8, or exceptionally (Marassá, 1985), and mark their trail with a silk up to 20 birds (Payne, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Nest-Site Selection by Western Screech-Owls in the Sonoran Desert, Arizona
    Western North American Naturalist Volume 63 Number 4 Article 16 12-3-2003 Nest-site selection by Western Screech-Owls in the Sonoran Desert, Arizona Paul C. Hardy University of Arizona, Tucson Michael L. Morrison University of California, Bishop Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Recommended Citation Hardy, Paul C. and Morrison, Michael L. (2003) "Nest-site selection by Western Screech-Owls in the Sonoran Desert, Arizona," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 63 : No. 4 , Article 16. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol63/iss4/16 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 63(4), ©2003, pp. 533-537 NEST~SITE SELECTION BY WESTERN SCREECH~OWLS IN THE SONORAN DESERT, ARIZONA Paul C. Hardyl,2 and Michael L. Morrison3 Key words: Gila Woodpecker, Gilded Flicker, nest-site selection, Otus kennicottii, saguaro cacti, Sonoran Desert, West­ ern Screech~Owl. The Western ScreecbOwl (Otus kennicottii) valley includes the creosote (Larrea triden­ is a small, nocturnal, secondary caVity-nesting tata)~white bursage (Ambrosia dumosa) series, bird that is a year-round resident throughout and in runnels and washes, the mixed-scrub much of western North America and Mexico series (Turner and Brown 1994). Temperatures (Marshall 1957, Phillips et al. 1964, AOU 1983, for the Arizona Upland and Lower Colorado Johnsgard 1988, Cannings and Angell 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • REGUA Bird List July 2020.Xlsx
    Birds of REGUA/Aves da REGUA Updated July 2020. The taxonomy and nomenclature follows the Comitê Brasileiro de Registros Ornitológicos (CBRO), Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological Records Committee, updated June 2015 - based on the checklist of the South American Classification Committee (SACC). Atualizado julho de 2020. A taxonomia e nomenclatura seguem o Comitê Brasileiro de Registros Ornitológicos (CBRO), Lista anotada das aves do Brasil pelo Comitê Brasileiro de Registros Ornitológicos, atualizada em junho de 2015 - fundamentada na lista do Comitê de Classificação da América do Sul (SACC).
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of a Clade of New World Doves (Columbidae: Zenaidini)
    Zootaxa 3669 (2): 184–188 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Correspondence ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3669.2.11 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:183526F0-B925-49EA-B2C6-49520634452A Classification of a clade of New World doves (Columbidae: Zenaidini) RICHARD C. BANKS1, JASON D. WECKSTEIN2, J.V. REMSEN, JR3 & KEVIN P. JOHNSON4 13201 Circle Hill Rd., Alexandria, VA 22305, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605 USA. E-mail [email protected] 3Museum of Natural Science and Dept. Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70776 USA. E-mail: [email protected] 4Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL 61820 USA. E-mail: [email protected] To evaluate the role of the formation of the Central American land bridge in diversification of the American avifauna, Johnson and Weckstein (2011) reconstructed a phylogeny, using DNA sequence data from four gene regions, of 24 nominal species in three putative genera of New World doves. Although a systematic revision of these doves was not a primary purpose of their study, Johnson and Weckstein (2011) provided information that helps to re-evaluate the presumed relationships among the taxa included. Their analysis supported a hypothesis of monophyly for a group containing seven species currently (American Ornithologists’ Union [AOU] 1998, Gibbs et al. 2001, Dickinson 2003, Remsen et al. 2012) placed in the genus Zenaida Bonaparte, 1838, and for a group of 12 taxa in 6 species (of as many as 11 currently recognized species) in the genus Leptotila Swainson, 1837 (Gibbs et al.
    [Show full text]