SHORT COMMUNICATIONS

ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 25: 237–243, 2014 © The Neotropical Ornithological Society

NON-RANDOM ORIENTATION IN CAVITY ENTRANCES IN A TROPICAL RAIN FOREST

Daniel Rico1 & Luis Sandoval2,3

1The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska. 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, ON, Canada, N9B3P4. 3Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro, San José, Costa Rica, CP 2090. E-mail: [email protected]

Orientación no al azar de las entradas de las cavidades de carpinteros en un bosque tropical.

Key words: Pale-billed Woodpecker, guatemalensis, Chestnut-colored Woodpecker, Celeus castaneus, Lineated Woodpecker, lineatus, Black-cheeked Woodpecker, pucherani, Costa Rica, Picidae.

INTRODUCTION tics such as vegetation coverage of the nesting substrate, surrounding vegetation, and forest Nest site selection play’s one of the main roles age (Aitken et al. 2002, Adkins Giese & Cuth- in the breeding success of , because this bert 2003, Sandoval & Barrantes 2006). Nest selection influences the survival of eggs, orientation also plays an important role in the chicks, and adults by inducing variables such breeding success of , because the as the microclimatic conditions of the nest orientation positively influences the microcli- and probability of being detected by preda- mate conditions inside the nest cavity (Hooge tors (Viñuela & Sunyer 1992). Although et al. 1999, Wiebe 2001), by reducing the woodpecker nest site selections are well estab- exposure to direct wind currents, rainfalls, lished, the majority of this information is and/or extreme temperatures (Ardia et al. based on temperate forest and com- 2006). Cavity entrance orientation showed munities (Newton 1998, Cornelius et al. 2008, non-random distribution in 11 of the 17 stud- Sandoval & Barrantes 2009, Acosta-Pérez et ied woodpecker species in America (Table 1). al. 2013). Woodpeckers select nest sites based In woodpecker species with non-random dis- in certain physical characteristics of trees such tributed cavity entrances, the main cause as hardness, size, height, and species (Aitken mentioned for this is to avoid extreme tem- et al. 2002, Adkins Giese & Cuthbert 2003, peratures (Lawrence 1967, Inouye et al. 1981, Sandoval 2008); or certain habitat characteris- Korol & Hutto 1984). Meanwhile, surround-

237 RICO & SANDOVAL ing habitats influenced the cavity orientation due to degradation, modification, or other in species with random distribution of cavities organisms creating them. The purpose was to (Vierling 1997). exclude cavities of uncertain origin. Despite what is known about cavity For each woodpecker cavity found we entrance orientation in temperate wood- took the following measurements: (1) cavity pecker species, the pattern of cavity entrance entrance orientation using a compass; (2) cav- orientation in Neotropical woodpecker’s ity entrance position relative to the forest in a remains poorly understood. Therefore, our 10 m radius from the snag: nest entrance fac- main objective in this study was to analyze if ing an opening (facing a gap or perpendicular woodpeckers show a pattern for cavity to the trail) or closed forest (oriented directly entrance orientation. If cavity entrance orien- to forest); and (3) the size of the woodpecker tation is important for breeding success in that created the nest. We sorted cavities into tropical woodpeckers, we expect to find a two categories of either small or large in over- non-random pattern in the entrance orienta- all size, because cavities vary according to the tion. Furthermore, we expect that orientation entrance size and form, but without seeing will be related with some ambient characteris- the birds inside the cavity it is impossible to tics such as wind currents or sun exposure. determine the exact species that created each Given that woodpecker cavities persist over cavity. Small cavity entrances, with circular time and the large majority are constructed nest entrances and diameters ≤ 7 cm were during the breeding season in Costa Rica created by Chestnut-colored (Celeus castaneus) (Stiles & Skutch 1989, Sandoval & Barrantes or Black-cheeked Woodpecker (Melanerpes 2006, Sandoval 2009), old cavities are a valu- pucherani) (LS unpub. data). Large cavity able resource of information to analyze entrances, with oval shape entrances and entrance orientation (Korol & Hutto 1984). diameter > 7 cm, were created by Pale-billed (Campephilus guatemalensis) or Lineated Wood- METHODS pecker (Dryocopus lineatus) (Skutch 1969, Male- kan 2011). There is a probability that some of We conducted this study from 15–17 July the cavities were not completely constructed 2013 (at the end of the woodpeckers breeding (abandoned during construction process) but season; Winkler & Christie 2002) at La Selva enough excavated to not separate from cavi- Biological Research Station, Heredia prov- ties used as nests. However, those cavities ince, Costa Rica (10°25’ N, 84°00’ W), along a still provide useful information about the ori- 5.4 km length trail that crossed through the entation selected to construct the cavity middle or edge of the forest (trail: Sendero entrance, and were used in the analysis. We Tres Rios -STR-). We walked down the mid- analyzed the cavity entrance orientation in dle of the trail and looked at both sides for both groups separately, because both showed snags (dead trees with or without branches differences in cavity sizes and form, which higher than 2 m and diameters at breast may be one of the factors that influence the height ≥ 10 cm) within 25 m of the trail. At entrance orientation. each snag we recorded the number of wood- Given that it is unknown if more than one pecker cavities that were circular or oval cavity was constructed by the same individual shape and extending into the trunk with the in the same snag, this would cause a pseudo- back wall not being visible from the ground replication problem, because cavity entrance using binoculars. We did not include any cav- orientation may reflect only the selection of ity that we could not assign to woodpeckers, one individual. Differences in the wood hard-

238 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS

TABLE 1. List of American woodpecker species where cavity entrance orientation has been studied for patterns.

Species Common name Orientation Reference Melanerpes formicivorus Acorn Woodpecker Non-random Hooge 1989 M. erythrocephalus Red-headed Woodpecker Non-random Reller 1972, Conner 1975 M. lewis Lewis’ Woodpecker Random Linder 1994, Vierling 1997 M. uropygialis Gila Woodpecker Non-random Inouye et al. 1981, Korol & Hutto 1984 M. carolinus Red-bellied Woodpecker Non-random Reller 1972, Conner 1975 Sphyrapicus thyroideus Williamson’s Sapsucker Non-random Crockett & Hadow 1975 S. nuchalis Red-naped Sapsucker Both Walters et al. 2002 S. varius Yellow-bellied Sapsucker Non-random Lawrence 1967, Inouye 1976 Picoides pubescens Downy Woodpecker Non-random Lawrence 1967, Conner 1975 P. villosus Hairy Woodpecker Non-random Lawrence 1967, Conner 1975 P. tridactylus American Three-toed Both Leonard 2001 Woodpecker P. arcticus Black-backed Woodpecker Both Dixon & Saab 2000 P. borealis Red-cockaded Woodpecker Non-random Dennnis 1971 P. albolarvatus White-headed Woodpecker Both Milne & Hejl 1989, Kimball et al. 1996, Kozma 2010 auratus Northern Flicker Both Lawrence 1967, Conner 1975, Inouye 1976, Stauffer & Best 1982, Ingold 1994 Campephilus magellanicus Non-random Ojeda 2006 Dryocopus pileatus Non-random Bent 1939, Conner 1975 ness within the snag may affect which side is same pair may defend several snags if they are more used for construction of the cavities in close proximity. However, the closest dis- between snags, since woodpecker prefer soft tances between two snags in our study was wood for the construction of cavities (San- approximately 200 m reducing the probability doval & Barrantes 2006), producing another that the same pair defend multiple snags. possible cause of pseudo-replication. To avoid We used the averages between snags to problems with pseudo-replication within the estimate the population cavity entrance orien- raw data, we randomly selected one cavity ori- tation following the Rao’s U spacing test for entation per snag (without replacement) per uniform distribution (U) for binomial or uni- woodpecker category to estimate a between modal distribution, according to the data ori- snag cavity entrance orientation average, fol- entation. We reported the mean angle relative lowing a similar approach used to estimate to magnetic north of the nest entrance and coefficient of variation between individuals in the 95% confidence interval based on 5000 acoustic analysis (Robisson et al. 1993). With bootstraps. This approach produces a more this approach we got a sample size equal to conservative value for the confidence inter- the number of snags, but both woodpecker vals. We used a Chi-square test for uniform cavity types were not present at each snag. distribution with 2 bins to analyze if wood- Another potential independence problem in pecker nest entrances of each group size were our data is the distance between snags. The more allocated in the direction of open or

239 RICO & SANDOVAL

FIG. 1. Mean direction and 95% confidence interval of tree cavities entrances using 360° range for: a) small woodpeckers and b) large woodpeckers group. Grey pie pieces are based in 10 bins of equal range degrees. The numbers inside each section represent the total number of cavity entrances that were allo- cated in that orientation. closed forest area. All analyses were con- northeast (mean direction =50.21°, lower ducted in PAST 2.17 (Hammer et al. 2001) limit = 18.83°, upper limit = 78.84°, U = and are shown as value of mean ± standard 1.94, P = 0.003, Fig. 1), no binomial distribu- error. tion pattern was observed for this wood- pecker group. RESULTS DISCUSSION We found 17 snags along the sampled trail and estimated a density of 0.63 snags/ha. We As in other studies of cavity nesting birds, we found 96 cavities in 16 of the 17 snags; 47 observed that more than one factor may (4.27 ± 1.13 cavity/snag density) cavities were influence the direction of the cavities assigned to the small woodpecker group and entrances. Tropical woodpeckers, like many of 49 (3.06 ± 0.83 cavity/snag density) nests to their temperate cousins, showed a non-ran- the large woodpecker group. Small wood- dom pattern in the orientation of their nest peckers oriented their cavity entrances signifi- entrance (Table 1). They appear to favor a cantly more to open areas (χ2 = 47, df = 1, P direction that improves microclimate condi- < 0.001), and to the northeast (mean direc- tions inside the cavity. Orientation also seems tion = 51.16°, lower limit = 13.41°, upper to be related to the feeding behavior of the limit = 117.60°, U = 176.3, P = 0.02, Fig. 1), species while reducing predator access to the although data showed a non-significant pat- nest. tern of binomial distribution (U = 152.0, P = According to our findings, both wood- 0.14). Large woodpeckers oriented their cav- pecker groups showed cavity entrances with a ity entrances significantly more to open areas non-random orientation, facing cavity (χ2 = 49, df = 48, P < 0.001), and to the entrances to northeast, and similar to the ori-

240 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS entation pattern observed for woodpecker tation was related to a certain degree with cavities entrances inside the forest for the sun/wind pattern during breeding season and study place (Boyle et al. 2008). This pattern in opening around the snags. Which variables orientation may increases the cavity’s expo- influence cavity orientation the most is still sure to the sun as occurred in temperate spe- unknown and a more detailed study that cies such as Hairy and Downy Woodpeckers, includes more snags and covers a larger area is Northern Flicker, and Yellow-bellied Sap- highly recommended to solve this disjunctive. sucker (Inouye 1976, Weibe 2001). Sun expo- sition may encourage evaporation of either ACKNOWLEDGMENTS nightly condensation or rainfall, producing more favourable microclimate conditions We would like to thank the staff at La Selva inside the cavities by maintains the proper and the Organization for Tropical Studies temperature and humidity for eggs and nest- (OTS) for allowing us to conduct research at lings (Maziarz & Wesołowski 2013). In addi- their station. We would like to thank Daniel tion, orientated cavity entrances toward the Zamora, Anjali Kumar, and Silvia Seger for all east may allow winds inside, given that pre- the support and assistance during the field dominant winds during the woodpecker work. We also thank Brendan Graham and A. breeding season are from the east or south- Kumar for all the valuables comments in the east (OTS 2013), and probably attributing to drafting of this manuscript. Support for this reduced internal temperature of the cavity. project came from scholarships and grants However, a study comparing internal temper- from the Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología atures of cavities oriented toward the east (MICIT) and the Consejo Nacional para against cavities in other orientations is neces- Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas sary to evaluate this assumption. (CONICIT) of Costa Rica, the Government Cavity nesting species in temperate forest of Ontario, and the University of Windsor. that foraged in open areas constructed and selected nests that faced open areas (Dobkin REFERENCES et al. 1995). We observed a similar pattern in the entrance direction in this study, where Acosta-Pérez, V., I. Zuria, I. Castellanos, & C. E. woodpeckers also orientated cavity entrances Moreno. 2013. Características de las cavidades y towards forest gaps or the forest trail. As in los sustratos de anidación utilizados por el Dobkin et al. (1995) the four woodpecker spe- Carpintero Mexicano (Picoides scalaris) en dos cies that created the nest cavities studied here localidades del centro de México. Ornitol. are open area foragers (Stiles & Skutch 1989), Neotrop. 24: 107–111. therefore, facing the nest entrances in this Adkins Giese, C., & F. Cuthbert. 2003. Influence of direction will make the cavity more accessible surrounding vegetation on woodpecker nest tree selection in oak forests of the Upper Mid- for adults returning from foraging sites. Ori- west, USA. For. Ecol. Manag. 179: 523–534. enting the cavity's entrance toward open areas Aitken, K., K. Wiebe, & K. Martin. 2002. Nest-site may also provide greater visibility to see reuse pattern for a cavity-nesting commu- potential predators; reducing the adult preda- nity in interior British Columbia. Auk 119: tion from scansorial like monkeys, 391–402. snakes, or coatis (Brightsmith 2005, White et Ardia, D. R., J. H. Pérez, & E. D. Clotfelter. 2006. al. 2006). Nest box orientation affects internal tempera- In conclusion, cavity entrance orientation ture and nest site selection by Tree Swallows. J. showed a non-random pattern and the orien- Field Ornithol. 77: 339–344.

241 RICO & SANDOVAL

Bent, A. C. 1939. Life histories of North American entrance holes to woodpecker nests in aspen woodpeckers. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 174: 1–134. trees. Condor 78: 101–102. Boyle, W. A., C. N. Ganong, D. B. Clark, & M. A. Inouye, R. S., N. J. Huntlya, & D. W. Inouye. 1981. Hast. 2008. Density, distribution, and attributes Non-random orientation of Gila Woodpecker of tree cavities in an old-growth tropical rain nest entrances in cacti. Condor 83: forest. Biotropica 40: 241–245. 88–89. Brightsmith, D. J. 2005. nesting in south- Kimball L. G, G. R. Martin, & R. D. Dixon. 1996. eastern : seasonal patterns and keystone White-headed Woodpecker (Picoides albolarva- trees. Wilson Bull. 117: 296–305. tus). In Poole, A. (ed.). The birds of North Conner, R. N. 1975. Orientation of entrances to America, no. 252. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, woodpecker nest cavities. Auk 92: 371–374. Ithaca, New York, USA. Downloaded on 28 Cornelius, C., K. Cockle, N. Politi, I. Berkunsky, L. February 2014 from http://www.bna.birds.cor- Sandoval, V. Ojeda, L. Rivera, M. Hunter Jr., & nell.edu/bna/species/252 K. Martin. 2008. Cavity nesting birds in Neo- Korol, J. J., & R. L. Hutto. 1984. Factors affecting tropical forests: cavities as a potentially limiting nest site location in Gila Woodpeckers. Condor resource. Ornitol. Neotrop. 19: 253–268. 86: 73–78. Crockett, A. B., & H. H. Hadow. 1975. Nest site Kozma, J. M. 2010. Characteristics of trees used by selection by Williamson’s and Red-naped Sap- White-Headed Woodpeckers for sap feeding in suckers. Condor 77: 365–368. Washington. Northwest. Nat. 91: 81–86. Dennis, J. V. 1971. Species using Red-cockaded Lawrence, L. D. 1967. A comparative life-history Woodpecker holes in northwestern South Car- study of four species of woodpeckers. Orni- olina. Bird Band. 42: 79–87. thol. Monogr. 5: 1–156. Dixon, R. D., & V. A. Saab. 2000. Black-backed Leonard, D. L. Jr. 2001. American Three-toed Woodpecker (Picoides arcticus). In Poole, A. (ed.). Woodpecker (Picoides dorsalis). In Poole, A. (ed.). The birds of North America, no. 509. Cornell The birds of North America, no. 588. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York, USA. Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York, USA. Downloaded on 28 February 2014 from http:/ Downloaded on 28 February 2014 from http:/ /www.bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/509. /www.bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/588. Dobkin, D. S., A. C. Rich, J. A. Pretare, & W. H. Linder, K. A. 1994. Habitat utilization and behav- Pyle. 1995. Nest-site relationships among cav- ior of nesting Lewis’s Woodpeckers (Melanerpes ity-nesting birds of riparian and snowpocket lewis) in the Laramie range, southeast Wyoming. aspen woodlands in the northwestern Great M. Sc. thesis, Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, Basin. Condor 97: 694–707. USA. Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., & P. D. Ryan, 2001. Malekan, I. S. 2011. Lineated Woodpecker (Dryoco- PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Pack- pus lineatus). In Schulenberg, T. S. (ed.). Neotro- age for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeont. pical Birds Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Elect. 4: 1–9. Ithaca, New York, USA. Downloaded on 28 Hooge, P. N. 1989. Movement patterns and nest February 2014 from http://www.neotropi- site selection in the cooperatively breeding cal.birds.cornell.edu/portal/species/over- Acorn Woodpecker Melanerpes formicivorus. M. view?p_p_spp=320376. Sc. thesis, Univ. of , Berkeley, Califor- Maziarz, M., & T. Wesołowski. 2013. Microclimate nia, USA. of tree cavities used by Graet Tits (Parus major) Hooge, P. N., M. T. Stanback, & W. D. Koenig. in a primaveral forest. Avian Biol. Res. 6: 1999. Nest-site selection in the Acorn Wood- 47–56. pecker. Auk 116: 45–54. Milne, K. A., & S. J. Hejl. 1989. Nest-site character- Ingold, D. J. 1994. Influence of nest-site competi- istics of White-headed Woodpeckers. J. Wildl. tion between European Starlings and wood- Manag. 53: 50–55. peckers. Wilson Bull. 106: 227–241. Newton, I. 1998. Population limitation in birds. Inouye, D. W. 1976. Nonrandom orientation of Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.

242 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS

Ojeda V. S. 2006. Magellanic Woodpecker (Campe- ests in Costa Rica. Wilson J. Ornithol. 121: philus magellanicus) nest site selection and repro- 75–81. ductive biology in northern Patagonia, Argen- Skutch, A. F. 1969. Life histories of Central Ameri- tina. Ph.D. diss., Univ. Nacional del Comahue, can birds. III. Pac. Coast Avifauna No. 35. Bariloche, . Stauffer, D. F., & L. B. Best. 1982. Nest-site selec- Organization for Tropical Studies (OTS). 2013. La tion by cavity-nesting birds of riparian habitats Selva Biological Research Station meteorologi- in Iowa. Wilson Bull. 94: 329–337. cal data collection. Downloaded on 19 July Stiles, F. G., & A. F. Skutch. 1989. A guide to the 2013 from http://ots.ac.cr/meteoro/default. birds of Costa Rica. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, php?pestacion=2 New York, USA. Reller, A. W. 1972. Aspects of behavioral ecology Vierling, K. T. 1997. Habitat selection of Lewis’s of Red-headed and Red-bellied Woodpeckers. Woodpeckers in southeastern Colorado. Wilson Am. Midl. Nat. 88: 270–290. Bull. 109: 121–130. Robisson, P., T. Aubin, & J.-C. Bremond. 1993: Viñuela, J., & C. Sunyer. 1992. Nest orientation and Individuality in the voice of the Emperor Pen- hatching success of Black Kites Milvus migrans guin Aptenodytes forsteri: adaptation to a noisy in Spain. Ibis 134: 340–345. environment. Ethology 94: 279–290. Walters, E. L., E. H. Miller, & P. E. Lowther. 2002. Sandoval, L. 2008. Implications of nest-site size Red-naped Sapsucker (Sphyrapicus nuchalis). In selection on the nest building strategy in Poole, A. (ed.). The birds of North America, woodpeckers (Picidae: Aves). Mét. Ecol. Sist. 3: no. 588. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, 1–5. New York, USA. Downloaded on 28 February Sandoval, L. 2009. Densidad de sitios para anidar y 2014 from http://www.bna.birds.cornell.edu/ su uso por parte de dos carpinteros Melanerpes bna/species/663b. (: Picidae) a lo largo de un gradiente White, T. H. Jr., G. G. Brown, & J. A. Collazo. urbano. Rev. Biol. Trop. 57 (Suppl. 1): 351–355. 2006. Artificial cavities and nest site selection Sandoval, L., & G. Barrantes. 2006. Selección de by Puerto Rican : a multiscale assess- árboles muertos por Melanerpes hoffmannii (- ment. Avian Conserv. Ecol. 1: 5. dae: Aves) para la construcción de nidos. Orni- Wiebe, K. L. 2001. Microclimate of tree cavity tol. Neotrop. 17: 295–300. nests: is it important for reproductive success Sandoval, L., & G. Barrantes. 2009. Relationship in Northern Flickers? Auk 118: 412–421. between species richness of wood excavator birds and cavity-adopters in seven tropical for- Accepted 17 July 2014.

243