The Iran-USA Crise a 52’ Documentary Directed by Ben Salama & Naoufel Brahimi El Mili Produced by Kuiv Productions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Iran-USA Crise a 52’ Documentary Directed by Ben Salama & Naoufel Brahimi El Mili Produced by Kuiv Productions 444 days The Iran-USA crise A 52’ documentary Directed by Ben Salama & Naoufel Brahimi El Mili Produced by Kuiv Productions PROVISIONAL DELIVERY : OCTOBER 2020 Summary A 444-day ordeal for American diplomats taken This film tells the story of events which unfolded hostage in Tehran, 444 days of humiliation for the from 4 November 1979 to 20 January 1981, a defining world’s greatest power, the United States, and 444 episode of the last half of the 20th century, and one days of fanaticism for the Iranian Islamists who were which marked the beginning of the conflict between imposing their will on their country and the world. the United States and its former ally, Iran. Writers’ note The American hostage crisis in Iran was an episode seize exclusive political power. of heightened tension in international relations The second event was the signing of the Camp David between the United States and Iran, which began on Accords on 26 March between Egypt and Israel 4 November 1979 and ended on 20 January 1981. For – the date on which Egyptian Islamists turned to 444 days, or nearly 15 months, 56 American diplomats radical struggle against Anwar Al-Sadat. The latter and civilians were held hostage by Iranian students in was assassinated in October 1981 in a spectacular the U.S. Embassy in Tehran. operation, whose mastermind was none other than This hostage-taking was part of a long series of events Ayman Al-Zawahiri, the current leader of Al Qaeda. that reshaped first the Arab-Muslim world, and then On 20 November 1979, hostages were seized in later the rest of the world. In this context, 1979 was the Great Mosque of Mecca, known in Arabic as Al- the annus horribilis for the Middle East. Four events in Masjid al-Harâm, literally the Sacred Mosque. A unit that year upset major regional and global balances. of 200 men, most of them Saudi nationals, stormed These upheavals still leave their mark today on the the holiest place in Islam. This unprecedented geopolitical equilibrium in this part of the world. hostage-taking lasted several days and required The first thunderbolt came on 1 February of that the intervention of French special forces – a detail fateful year: The triumphant return of Ayatollah which was naturally enough denied by the Saud Khomeini to Iran and the creation of an Islamic family. Christians in the heart of Mecca would be a Republic in the world’s most oil-rich land. Khomeini far more serious sacrilege than the hostage-taking arrived in Tehran backed by a motley coalition of itself. In reality, the French soldiers went through a communists, progressives, liberals, merchants, and quick conversion to Islam in order to be able to enter clerics. It was the attack on the American compound the sacred mosque. It was this precedent that led to followed by the taking of diplomat hostages that the rapid acceptance of the presence of hundreds of would, over time, radicalize the situation in Iran and thousands of American and European soldiers in the provide the opportunity for Shiite fundamentalists to holy land of Saudi Arabia during the first Gulf War. 2 444 days: the Iran-USA crisis The fourth event was the invasion of Afghanistan by would declare war on the whole world on September Soviet troops on 24 December. The wave of Islamic 11. solidarity unleashed by Moscow’s aggression against Forty years later, America has still not turned the Kabul would make that country the primary breeding page on the humiliation of its diplomat hostages. ground for international jihadism fueled with Saudi This 15-month crisis, which was not resolved until money, Wahhabi rhetoric, and American weapons. January 1981, has subsequently developed into a Tens of thousands of Muslims from different countries latent conflict between the United States and Iran, were joining Osama Bin Laden and his allies. Al which is part of the current chaos in the Middle East. Qaeda was taking shape to structure these jihadists who had come to fight the Soviet invader. Later, they Ben Salama and Naoufel Brahimi El Mili Director’s note The story of the American hostages in Tehran is a The story will be told mainly through the plentiful genuine thriller, with many twists and turns, shadowy archives of the time, since this Iranian-American crisis characters and official emissaries. was very widely covered by the many US networks, of The film will revolve around two main characters: The course, but also by Iranian television, the Western victor, Ayatollah Khomeini; and the loser, President media, and that of mediating countries (Algeria, Jimmy Carter. One had just overthrown the Shah of Switzerland, Germany). It is one of the events of the Iran and was preparing to eliminate all those factions 20th century with the most media coverage. that had helped him rise to power and establish his The shadowy actions and secret meetings carried out personal supremacy in the name of Islam. The other by certain emissaries will be the subject of animated was the leader of the world’s superpower, the United scenes, combined with photos of the characters and States, a man who feared that this hostage situation locations in question, using simple 2D animation could ruin his chances of re-election. in black-and-white, created in association with This Khomeini/Carter face-off was enriched by an illustrator used to sketching realistic scenes. secondary characters in each camp, as well as I’m thinking of Jacques Ferrandez, with whom I’ve intermediaries who sought to use their influence to worked in the past. find a favorable conclusion to this crisis. The interviewees in the film will all be witnesses to the The tragedy of the hostage-taking came at a crucial events that took place throughout this drama. They time for both countries. Both Iran and the United will tell us about their role, and their feelings at the States were entering an election period. In Iran, time, allowing the viewer to relive these events. These these were the first elections after the fall of the interviews will be shot using back-lighting to create Shah, and clerics were maneuvering to consolidate the thriller atmosphere of those 444 days, which still power through the ballot box. In the United States, haunt the memory of Iranians and Americans. the campaign for the presidential election unfolded Ben Salama during the 444-day ordeal for the hostages. 3 444 days: the Iran-USA crisis Synopsis The United States and Iran have been in conflict for supporting students stormed the US embassy in the past 40 years, a conflict that began in 1979. This Tehran, sequestering all the American diplomats and was a dark year for the American administration. military personnel within. It began with the downfall of their staunch ally, the This was the start of a hostage-taking that lasted 444 Shah of Iran, in February. That marked the end of a days, until their release in January 1981, a few hours ruler who had always obeyed the directives of his before a change of president in Washington. American protectors. In his place, a cleric, Ayatollah Khomeini, arrived at the head of this great Middle Since then, Iran has become an obsession for the Eastern land after several months of huge popular Americans, who have never forgotten the images demonstrations. coming from Tehran, broadcast daily by their television channels, and the powerlessness of their A few months later, on 4 November 1979, Khomeini- great country to free their compatriots. The assault November 1979 in Tehran, a city rocked by almost daily noisily in front of the American embassy. They all had demonstrations. The departure of the Shah did not Khomeini’s portrait on their T-shirts. They demanded put an end to the agitation of all kinds to definitively the extradition of the Shah, who had taken refuge in establish the power of the Islamist fundamentalists. the United States, shouting «Death to America». The In that year, a broad coalition ranging from the left to morning ended with a sit-in, which could have lasted the Islamists ruled the country. several days. But things heated up after the midday On the morning of 4 November, around 10:00am, prayer. Led by a radical cleric, Ezzatollah Zarghmani, more than 400 excited students demonstrated they climbed the high gates of the chancellery, armed with sticks, iron bars and other weapons. 4 444 days: the Iran-USA crisis Behind the thick windowpanes, American diplomats watch this spectacle unfold. The mission chief ordered the marines inside the compound to get to work around the shredders. Thousands of compromising documents must be destroyed. At the end of the embassy’s lawn, the marines tried to stop the students leading their assault to the cries of: «La Ilah Illallah!» (God is One). The 10 hectares of this vast property were difficult to defend. The face-off between the marines and the attackers lasted more than two hours, the tension reaching its peak in front of the imposing building. Inside, the shredders could not keep up; time was without a single shot being fired. The attackers running out. Passports, telegrams, and secret claimed to belong to «Muslim Students Supporting documents were burned in garbage cans. On the lawn, Imam Khomeini», a hitherto unknown organization. a student spotted thick black smoke coming out of a But there was no doubt that it had the support of the window and yelled” «They’re burning documents!” top leaders of the Shiite clergy. «Let’s occupy this nest of spies right now!» shouted The assault was carried out amidst chaos, with six another.
Recommended publications
  • Report on the Situation of Human Rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Prepared by the Special Representative of the Commission on Human Rights, Mr
    UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council E/CN.4/1996/59 21 March 1996 ENGLISH ONLY COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Fifty-second session Item 10 of the provisional agenda QUESTION OF THE VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS IN ANY PART OF THE WORLD, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO COLONIAL AND OTHER DEPENDENT COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES Report on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran, prepared by the Special Representative of the Commission on Human Rights, Mr. Maurice Copithorne (Canada), pursuant to Commission resolution 1995/68 of 8 March 1995 and Economic and Social Council decision 1995/279 of 25 July 1995 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page I. INTRODUCTION................... 1- 26 4 A. Position of human rights in the world today . 3 - 6 4 B. Special Representative’s sources ...... 7- 10 5 C. Activities of the Special Representative . 11 - 16 6 D. Correspondence ............... 17- 18 7 E. Underlying questions ............ 19 7 F. Preliminary comments on the Special Representative’s visit to the Islamic Republic of Iran .......... 20- 26 8 GE.96-11290 (E) E/CN.4/1996/59 page 2 CONTENTS (continued) Paragraphs Page II. LEGAL SYSTEM................... 27- 57 9 A. Rights of an accused ............ 28- 29 9 B. Court system ................ 30- 35 10 C. Selection and training of judges ...... 36- 40 11 D. Clerical courts ............... 41 12 E. Punishments ................. 42- 50 13 F. Independent Bar Association ......... 51- 54 14 G. Atmosphere of the law ............ 55- 57 15 III. STATUS OF WOMEN ................. 58- 64 16 IV. THE FATWA AGAINST SALMAN RUSHDIE......... 65- 67 17 V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Month of January: Intensification of Conflicts Between Different Projects in Iran and the Rise of the Global Confederation of Iranian Students (GCIS)
    Shiva Tabari February 2020 The Long month of January: intensification of conflicts between different projects in Iran and the Rise of the Global Confederation of Iranian Students (GCIS) There are moments in history, due to a myriad of events, shifts in the (e)motion of people, and simultaneity of social movements, that participants have a strange feeling of intensification of time. Any day endures as much as a week, every week appears as a month or so. It is unbelievable for people that this amount of change and events have happened only during a week or so. This amount of conflict and clash of ideas, bodies, projects should happen in several years or maybe more. Hence, if people in (so-called) Western countries like Australia, which have a relatively stable country, want to understand the everyday life of Iranians in January 2020 and learn from our experience, they have, first of all, to imagine themselves in a situation that all of the sad news they hear during some years, all of anger they feel due to misbehavior of their ruling class, all of their nightmares about another world war and losing their normal life, all their hopes and hopelessness, and also all of the social/political activities which they do during many years (demonstration, strike, signing a petition etc.), have been compacted and concentrated in a single month. I call it intensification of history. Possibly, an element of a revolutionary situation. I am sure that Iranian people had the same feeling during the September of 1941 when both the Allies and the Soviet Union invaded Iran, occupied Tehran and forcibly abdicated Reza Pahlavi and assigned his son (Mohammadreza), a puppet, as the King.
    [Show full text]
  • Yazdi, Iranian Foreign Minister Turned Dissident, Stood up for His Ideals
    September 17, 2017 15 News & Analysis Iran Obituary Yazdi, Iranian foreign minister turned dissident, stood up for his ideals Gareth Smyth As an activist outside Iran for 20 tinue the politics of Mohammed years before the revolution, Yazdi Mossadegh, the prime minister knew leading Iranian opposition ousted in 1953 by a US- and British- London figures such as philosopher Ali Sha- backed military coup after he na- riati and Mostafa Chamran, later tionalised Iran’s oil. hortly after the 1979 Irani- defence minister, before he became Like Mossadegh, Yazdi regard- an Revolution toppled the spokesman for Khomeini when he ed Washington’s role in 1953 as a shah of Iran, Syrian For- left Iraq in 1978 for a new base in departure from the principles on eign Minister Abdul Halim Neauphle-le-Château, just outside which the United States was found- Khaddam visited Tehran Paris. When the army refused to ed. Yazdi had emigrated to America Sand presented Iran’s new foreign quell demonstrations in Iran and in 1960, became a US citizen and minister, Ebrahim Yazdi, with a the shah fled, Yazdi returned home for much of the 1970s was a medi- pistol. Startled by the gift — and with Khomeini but would last less cal doctor in Houston. His approach perhaps by the Ba’athist mindset it than a year as revolutionary Iran’s was far more nuanced than slogans revealed — Yazdi placed it in a cup- first foreign minister. such as “Death to America” and he board and forgot about it. looked forward to a day when Teh- Years later, when Yazdi was a ran and Washington could enjoy re- leading dissident, security police lations based on respect.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of National Celebrations in Post-Revolutionary Iran
    Leiden University Research Master in Middle Eastern Studies The Politics of National Celebrations in post-revolutionary Iran Dario Intini s1385267 Supervisor: Dr. A.A. (Asghar) Seyed-Gohrab MASTER'S THESIS August 2015 Contents List of Figures ……………………………………………………………………………... 3 Notes on Transliteration, Translations, and Dates……………………………………… 4 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………5 The Scope of the Thesis…………………………………………………………………. 9 Organization of the Thesis……………………………………………………………... 10 Previous Studies on the Subject………………………………………………………... 11 Chapter One: Theoretical Framework…………………………………………………..13 Theories of Collective Memory………………………………………………………….13 Commemorations………………………………………………………………………..15 National Celebrations……………………………………………………………………16 Religious and Secular Festivals, Rituals, and Symbols………………………………....18 Nations, Nationalism, and Iranian Identity……………………………………………...20 Commemorative Narrative, and Master Commemorative Narrative…………………...23 Chapter Two: Iranian Calendar………………………………………………………...25 Public Holidays………………………………………………………………………....28 The Islamization of the Calendar……………………………………………………….31 The appropriation of non-Islamic commemorations……………………………………32 The appropriation of western commemorations………………………………………...33 The appropriation of past historicl events………………………………………………34 Chapter Three: Ceremonies around the death of the Shiite Saint Hoseyn....................37 Official State Narrative………………………………………………………………… 37 The Politics of the Commemoration…………………………………………………… 39 Associated Events………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • From Protest to Prison: Iran One Year After the Election 5
    from protest to pri son IrAn onE yEAr AftEr tHE ELECtIon amnesty international is a global movement of 2.8 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. amnesty international publications first published in 2010 by amnesty international publications international secretariat peter Benenson house 1 easton street london Wc1X 0DW United Kingdom www.amnesty.org © amnesty international publications 2010 index: mDe 13/062/2010 original language: english printed by amnesty international, international secretariat, United Kingdom all rights reserved. this publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. the copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. for copying in any other circumstances, or for re-use in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. Cover phot o: Demonstration in tehran following the disputed 12 June 2009 presidential election. © Javad montazeri Back cover phot o: a mass “show trial” in tehran’s revolutionary court, 25 august 2009; defendants are dressed in grey. © ap/pa photo/fars news agency, hasan Ghaedi CONTENTS 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iranian Revolution at 30
    Viewpoints Special Edition The Iranian Revolution at 30 The Middle East Institute Washington, DC Middle East Institute The mission of the Middle East Institute is to promote knowledge of the Middle East in Amer- ica and strengthen understanding of the United States by the people and governments of the region. For more than 60 years, MEI has dealt with the momentous events in the Middle East — from the birth of the state of Israel to the invasion of Iraq. Today, MEI is a foremost authority on contemporary Middle East issues. It pro- vides a vital forum for honest and open debate that attracts politicians, scholars, government officials, and policy experts from the US, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. MEI enjoys wide access to political and business leaders in countries throughout the region. Along with information exchanges, facilities for research, objective analysis, and thoughtful commentary, MEI’s programs and publications help counter simplistic notions about the Middle East and America. We are at the forefront of private sector public diplomacy. Viewpoints are another MEI service to audiences interested in learning more about the complexities of issues affecting the Middle East and US rela- tions with the region. To learn more about the Middle East Institute, visit our website at http://www.mideasti.org Cover photos, clockwise from the top left hand corner: Shahram Sharif photo; sajed.ir photo; sajed.ir photo; ? redo photo; sajed. ir photo; Maryam Ashoori photo; Zongo69 photo; UN photo; and [ john ] photo. 2 The Middle East Institute Viewpoints: The Iranian Revolution at 30 • www.mideasti.org Viewpoints Special Edition The Iranian Revolution at 30 The Middle East Institute Viewpoints: The Iranian Revolution at 30 • www.mideasti.org 3 Viewpoints: 1979 The year 1979 was among the most tumultuous, and important, in the history of the modern Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2009 Presidential Election in Iran: Fair Or Foul? Farhad Khosrokhavar, Marie Ladier-Fouladi
    The 2009 Presidential election in Iran: fair or foul? Farhad Khosrokhavar, Marie Ladier-Fouladi To cite this version: Farhad Khosrokhavar, Marie Ladier-Fouladi. The 2009 Presidential election in Iran: fair or foul?. 2021. hal-03209899 HAL Id: hal-03209899 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03209899 Preprint submitted on 27 Apr 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES EUI Working Papers RSCAS 2012/29 ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES Mediterranean Programme THE 2009 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN IRAN: FAIR OR FOUL? Farhad Khosrokhavar and Marie Ladier-Fouladi EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE, FLORENCE ROBERT SCHUMAN CENTRE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES MEDITERRANEAN PROGRAMME The 2009 Presidential election in Iran: fair or foul? FARHAD KHOSROKHAVAR AND MARIE LADIER-FOULADI EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2012/29 This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the author(s), editor(s). If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the working paper, or other series, the year and the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • The Failure of Mehdi Bazargan How the Revolutionary Council, The
    The Failure of Mehdi Bazargan How the Revolutionary Council, the Clerical Oligarchy, and United States Foreign Policy Undermined the Liberal Democracy of Iran in 1979 by Christopher Ramsey B.A. in History, May 2012, Western Kentucky University M.A in History, August, 2016, The George Washington University A Thesis submitted to The Faculty of The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts August 31, 2016 Thesis directed by Muriel Atkin Professor of History © Copyright 2016 by Christopher Ramsey All rights reserved ii The author wishes to dedicate this work to Kayla; my bride, my advocate, and my best friend. iii Acknowledgments The author wishes to thank the professors at the George Washington University for their guidance, wisdom, and dedication to their work, both in the classroom and in their respective fields. I arrived at GW overwhelmed by the expectations ahead of me, but left with confidence, thanks in large part to the lessons accrued in your classrooms. Doctors Adam Howard, Muriel Atkins, J. Furman Daniels III, Benjamin Hopkins, Greg Brazinsky, Shira Robinson, Shervin Malekzadeh, Marcy Norton, and Dina Khoury, as well as Ambassador James Jeffrey, thank you all. I would also like to thank my professors at Western Kentucky University, especially Doctors Carol Crowe-Carraco, Scott Girdner, Ingrid Lilly, and Juan Romero, for helping to set me on this path. I also need to thank two teachers who impacted me in my youth: Tony Kleem and the late Kim Dearborn Brickman. As one of my favorite teachers in high school, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Republic of Iran
    ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN NGO REPORT IN RESPONSE TO THE LIST OF ISSUES PRESENTED TO THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE HRC’S 103rd SESSION Iran Human Rights Documentation Center http://www.iranhrdc.org/ Islamic Republic of Iran Status: List of Issues distributed May 2011 Response to the list of issues to be taken up in connection with the consideration of the third periodic report of Iran (CCPR/C/IRN/3) Author: Iran Human Rights Documentation Center http://www.iranhrdc.org Contact: Renee C. Redman, Esq., Executive Director, Iran Human Rights Documentation Center [email protected] 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 4 Non-discrimination and equal right of men and women (art. 2(1), 3 and 26) .................... 5 Issue #3. ................................................................................................................................. 5 Right to life (art.6).................................................................................................................... 7 Issue #6. ................................................................................................................................. 7 Issue #7. ............................................................................................................................... 24 Issue #9. ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Domestic Roles of Iran's Islamic
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. The Rise of the Pasdaran Assessing the Domestic Roles of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps Frederic Wehrey, Jerrold D.
    [Show full text]
  • Reformist Islam Versus Radical Islam in Iran
    THE BROOKINGS PROJECT ON U.S. RELATIONS WITH THE ISLAMIC WORLD WORKING PAPER Number 4, November 2010 REFORMIST ISLAM VERSUS RADICAL ISLAM IN IRAN Mehrangiz Kar at BROOKINGS THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 1775 MASSACHUSETTS AVE., NW WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036-2103 www.brookings.edu THE BROOKINGS PROJECT ON U.S. RELATIONS WITH THE ISLAMIC WORLD WORKING PAPER Number 4, November 2010 REFORMIST ISLAM VERSUS RADICAL ISLAM IN IRAN Mehrangiz Kar at BROOKINGS Saban Center or Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World (IWR) Working Papers present prelim- inary conclusions or work-in-progress based on research by Saban Center (IWR) scholars. Working papers are meant to stimulate de- bate and discussion on difficult policy questions. As with all Brook- ings papers, Working Papers do not necessarily reflect the views of the Saban Center, the Brookings Institution, or the Institution’s board of trustees. All Saban Center (IWR) Working Papers are available online at www.brookings.edu/sabancenter, and comments are welcome. Other Saban Center (IWR) Working Papers include: The Conquest of Muslim Hearts and Minds? Perspectives on U.S. Re- form and Public Diplomacy Strategies by Abdelwahab el-Affendi Arab and American Think Tanks: New Possibilities for Cooperation? New Engines for Reform? by Ezzat Ibrahim The Interplay Between U.S. Foreign Policy And Political Islam In Post-Soeharto Indonesia by M. Syafi’i Anwar R EFO R MIST I SLAM VE R SUS R ADICAL I SLAM IN I R AN T HE S A BAN C ENTE R FO R M IDDLE E AST P OLICY AT BROOKINGS II About the Author Mehrangiz Kar is an Iranian scholar, activist, she was convicted and sentenced to four years’ im- writer and lawyer specializing in women’s rights prisonment on charges of acting against national and family law.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran: Informal Networks and Leadership Politics
    Advanced Research and Assessment Group Middl e East Series 08/12 Defence Academy of the United Kingdom Iran: Informal Networks and Leadership Politics Dr Adam Goodman Informal networks have played a major role in the evolution of the Islamic Republic of Iran’s internal and external politics.1 Despite the passage of nearly 29 years since the Iranian revolution, informal networks, rather than formal parties, continue to dominate Iranian politics. The ongoing debate about whether the country needs political parties is, in itself, testimony to the power of informal networks in Iran.2 However, what is noteworthy about Iranian informal networks is that they continue to exist with a very strong and centralized state apparatus which has deep institutional roots in the country.3 As a result, Iranian post-revolutionary politics has had a kaleidoscopic nature. The competition between the informal networks for the control of various state institutions is what makes Iranian politics particularly complex. Moreover, the failure of the state to impose its authority and the lack of a strong partisan tradition in the country mean that debate over key questions of national importance such as republicanism versus theocracy, nuclear policy and the relationship between the executive and legislative branches of the state are often conducted in terms of political conflicts between various factions. Political coalitions have formed and fallen apart because party politics has not become well established. This paper will present a number of cases of the activities of informal networks to illustrate their impact on Iranian politics and foreign policy. Endnotes 1 See for example, Abbas William Samii, “Order out of Chaos: The mad, mad world of Iranian foreign policy”, Hoover Digest, 2004, No.3, Abbas William Samii, “The Iranian nuclear issue and informal networks”, Naval War College Review, January 1, 2006.
    [Show full text]