DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography 419 Bibliography Secondary Sources and Social Movement Theory Adelkhah, Fariba. 2000. Being Modern in Iran. Translated by Jonathan Derrick. New York: Columbia University Press. Abrahamian Ervand. 1989. The Iranian Mojahedin. New Haven: Yale University Press __________. 1985. “The Guerilla Movement in Iran, 1963-1977.” Pp 149-74 in Iran: Revolution in Turmoil, Helah Afshar, (ed). New York: State University of New York Press. __________. 1985. “The Crowd in Iranian Politics, 1905-53” Pp 121-148 in Iran: Revolution in Turmoil, Helah Afshar, (ed). New York: State University of New York Press. __________. 1982. Iran Between Two Revolutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.. Afary, Janet. 1996. “Steering Between Scylla and Charybdis: Shifting Gender Roles in 20th Century Iran.” NWSA Journal Spring: __________. 1989. “On the Origins of Feminism in Early 2oth Century Iran.” Journal of Women’s History. 2:65-87. Afshar, Haleh. 1998. Islam and Feminism: An Iranian Case-Study. London: Macmillan __________. 1997. “Women and Work” Political Studies. Afkhami, Mahnaz and Freidl, Erika. (eds) 1994 In the Eye of the Storm: Women in Post- Revolutionary Iran Syracuse University Press. Akhavi, Shahrough 1996. “Contending Discourses in Shi’i Law on the Doctrine of Wilayat al- Faqih” Iranian Studies. 29 Summer Fall: 229-268. __________. 1992. “The Clergy’s Concepts of Rule in Egypt and Iran” Annals of theAmerican Academy of Political and Social Science. 524: 92-102. __________. 1988. “The role of the clergy in Iranian politics, 1949-1954. Pp 91-117 in James Bill and Roger Louis. Mussadiq, Iranian Nationalism, and Oil. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. __________. 1980. Religion and Politics in Contemporary Iran: Clergy State Relations in the Pahlavi Period. Albany, NY: State University Press. 420 Algar Hamid. 1969. Religion and the State in Iran 1785-1906. Berkeley CA: University of California Press. ___________. 1981 “Forward.” Editor and Translator Islam and Revolution: Writings and Declarations of Imam Khomeini Berkely, CA Mizan Press. Agence France Presse. 1999. Nov. 9. “Leading Iranian editor’s trial continues amid press protests.” Agence France Presse. 1999. October 11. “Iran Jails female editor for first time ever.” _________. 1999. Nov. 9. “Abdollah Nouri calls for end to silence over past leaders.” Ajami Fouad. 1998. Dream Palace of the Arabs: A generation’s odyssey. New York : Pantheon Books, c1998. Amanat, Abbas. 1988. “In Between the Madrassa and the Marketplace: The Designation of Clerical Leadership in Modern Shi’ism” Pp 98-131 Arjomand, Said Amir (ed) Authority and Political Culture in Shi’ism. Albany NY: State University Press of New York. Amirahmadi, Hooshang. 1996. “Emerging Civil Society in Iran.” SAIS Review 16.2: 87-107. Anderson, John Ward. Jan. 28, 2001. “Iran Sentences Agents in Deaths Of Four Dissadents: Three to Die; 12 Get Prison Terms.” Washington Post (A22). Arjomand, Said Amir (ed). 1988. Authority and Political Culture in Shi’ism. Albany NY: State University Press of New York. _________. 1984a. The Shadow of God and the Hidden Imam: Religion, Political Order, and Social Change in Shi’ite Iran from the Beginning of 1890. Chicago: University of Chicago Press _________. 1984b (ed). From Nationalism to Revolutionary Islam. Albany NY: State University Press of New York. _________. 1981. “The Ulema’s Traditionalist Opposition to Parliamentarianism, 1907-1909. Middle Eastern Studies, vol 17. Armanjani, Yahya and Ricks, Thomas M. [1970] 1986. Middle East: Past and Present. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall. Ayabi, Nazih N. 1991. Political Islam: Religion and Politics in the Arab World. New York: Routeledge . 421 _________.1992. “State Islam and Communal Plurality” Journal of International Affairs. 524:79-91. _________.1992. “The Politics of Militant Islamic Movements in the Middle East” Journal of International Affairs. 36:79-91. Azimi, Fakhreddin. 1989. Iran: The Crisis of Democracy: 1941-53. London: I.B. Tauris. _________. 1988. “The reconciliation of politics and ethics, nationalism and democracy: an overview of the political career of Dr. Muhammad Musaddiq.” Pp 47-67 in James Bill and Roger Louis. Mussadiq, Iranian Nationalism, and Oil. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. Bakhash, Saul. 1998. “Iran’s Remarkable Election” Journal of Democracy. 9.1: 80-94 _________.1990a. The Reign of the Ayatollahs: Iran and the Islamic Revolution. New York: Basic Books. _________. 1990b. “The Politics of Land, Law and Social Justice in Iran” in R.K. Ramanzani (ed) Iran’s Revolution: Search for Concensus. Indiana University Press. _________.1998. “Iran’s Remarkable Election.” Journal of Democracy. 9.1: 80-94 Bayat Mongol. 1991. Iran’s First Revolution: Shiism and the Constitutional Revolution of 1905- 1909. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Beckford, James 1977. “Explaining Religious Movements” International Social Science Journal Vol. 24 No.2: 235-249. _________. 1990. “The sociology of religion and social problems.” Sociological Analysis. 51:1- 14. Bill, James and Louis, Roger [eds]. 1988. Mussadiq, Iranian Nationalism, and Oil. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. Bloch, Marc. 1953. The Historian’s craft. Translated by Peter Putnam. New York: Vintage. Bonin, Michael E. 1981. “Shops and Shopkeepers: Dynamics of an Iranian Provincial Bazaar.” Pp 233-257. Nikkie Keddie and Michael Bonine (eds) Modern Iran: The Dialectics of Continuity and Change. Albany NY: State Univeristy of New York Press. Bourejerdi, Mehrzad. 1996. Iranian Intellectuals and the West: The Tormented Triumph of Nativism. Syracuse NY: Syracuse University Press. Brand, Karl-Werner. 1990. ‘Cyclical Aspects of New Social Movements: Waves of Cultural Criticism and Mobilization Cycles of New Middle Class Radicalism.” Challenging the 422 Political Order. Edited by Dalton, Russel and Kuechler, Manfred. New York: Oxford University Press. Brinton, Crane. 1965. The Anatomy of Revolution. New York: Vintage. Browne, Edward G. [1910] 1966. The Persian Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Buechler, Steven M. 1993. “Beyond Resource Mobilization? Emerging Trends in Social Movement Theory.” The Sociological Quarterly 34(2):217-235. Chehabi, H.E. 1990. Iranian Politics and Modernism: The Liberation Movement of Iran under the Shah and Khomeini. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Chelkowski, Peter (ed) 1979. Ta’ziyeh: Ritual and Drama in Iran. New York: New York University Press. Chelkowski, Peter and Dabashi, Hamid. 1999. Staging a Revolution: The Art of Persuasion in the Islamic Republic of Iran. New York: New York University Press. Columbia University’s Bureau of Applied Social Research. 1954. The Political Extremes in Iran. New York: Columbia University. Cottam, Richard. 1988. “ Nationalism in the twentieth-century Iran and Dr Muhammad Mussaddiq.” p 23-46 in James Bill and Roger Louis. Mussadiq, Iranian Nationalism, and Oil. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. _________. [1964] 1979. Nationalism in Iran. Pittsburgh. PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Curzon, Lord G. 1892. Persia and the Persian Question. 2 Volumes. London; Longman, Green and Company. Dabashi, Hamid. 1993. Theology of Discontent: The Ideological Formation of the Islamic Revolution in Iran. New York: New York University Press. Davies, James C. 1962. “Toward a Theory of Revolution.” American Sociological Review (27)1:5-19. della Porta, Donatella. 1995. Social Movements, Political Violence, and the State: A Comparative Analysis of Italy and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Diba, Farhad. 1986. Mohammad Mossaddegh: A Political Biography. London: Croom Helm. Dinmore, Guy. 2001. “Protest reveals rift among Iran’s hardliners” Financial Times. Febuary 14. Durkheim, Emile. 1965. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life New York: Free Press 423 Eagleton, Terry 1991. Ideology: An Introduction. London and New York: 1991. The Economist 1999. “Political Law” Sept. 18: 9. The Economist 1998a. “Iran: From God or Man?” Oct. 24: 42. The Economist 1998b. “Mayor’s jailing highlights crisis in Iranian system” April 14: 9. The Economist 1998c. “Iran: Political arrests” April 11: 9. The Economist 1998d. “Iran: Enough to make you cry” March 7: 39. Eickelman, Dale and Piscatori, James. 1996. Muslim Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Enayat, Hamid. 1982. Modern Islamic Political Thought Modern Middle East Series Austin TX: University of Texas Press. Esposito, John. 1988. Islam: The Straight Path. New York: Oxford Press. _________. [1984] 1991. Islam and Politics. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. _________. 1992. The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality? New York: Oxford Press. _________. 1996. Islam and Democracy. New York: Oxford Press. Esposito, John and Donohue, John J. [editors] 1982. Islam in Transition: Muslim Perspectives. New York: Oxford Press. Esposito, John. [editor] 1983. Voices of Resurgent Islam. New York: Oxford Press. Eyerman, Ron and Jamison, Andrew. 1991. Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach. University Park: Penn. State University Press. Fabian, Johannes. 1979. “The Anthropology of Religious Movements: From Explanation to Interpretation. Social Research. 46(1): 4-35. Falk, Richard. Kim, Samuel. Mendlovitz, Saul. [Editors] 1991. The United Nations and a Just World Order. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Ferdows, Adele. 1986. “Shariati and Khomeini on Women.” Pp 127-137 in Nikke Keddie and Eric Hooglund [eds]. The Iranian Revolution & The Islamic Republic. Syracuse, NY: Sracuse University Press. 424 Ferrier, Ronald. 1988. “The Anglo-Iranian oil dispute: a triangular
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IRAN April 2000
    COUNTRY ASSESSMENT - IRAN April 2000 Country Information and Policy Unit I. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 This assessment has been produced by the Country Information & Policy Unit, Immigration & Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a variety of sources. 1.2 The assessment has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum determination process. The information it contains is not exhaustive, nor is it intended to catalogue all human rights violations. It concentrates on the issues most commonly raised in asylum claims made in the United Kingdom. 1.3 The assessment is sourced throughout. It is intended to be used by caseworkers as a signpost to the source material, which has been made available to them. The vast majority of the source material is readily available in the public domain. 1.4 It is intended to revise the assessment on a 6-monthly basis while the country remains within the top 35 asylum producing countries in the United Kingdom. 1.5 The assessment will be placed on the Internet (http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/ind/cipu1.htm). An electronic copy of the assessment has been made available to the following organisations: Amnesty International UK Immigration Advisory Service Immigration Appellate Authority Immigration Law Practitioners' Association Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants JUSTICE Medical Foundation for the care of Victims of Torture Refugee Council Refugee Legal Centre UN High Commissioner for Refugees CONTENTS I SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 - 1.6 II GEOGRAPHY 2.1 - 2.2
    [Show full text]
  • PATTERNS of DISCONTENT: WILL HISTORY REPEAT in IRAN? by Michael Rubin and Patrick Clawson *
    PATTERNS OF DISCONTENT: WILL HISTORY REPEAT IN IRAN? By Michael Rubin and Patrick Clawson * While international attention is focused on Iran’s nuclear program and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s bombast, Iranian society itself is facing turbulent times. Increasingly, patterns are re-emerging that mirror events in the years before the Islamic revolution. These include political disillusionment, domestic protest, government failure to match public expectations of economic success, and labor unrest. Nevertheless, the Islamic regime has learned the lessons of the past and is determined not to repeat them, even as political discord crescendos. This essay is derived from the authors’ recent book, Eternal Iran: Continuity and Chaos (Palgrave-Macmillan, 2005). Mahmud Ahmadinejad’s victory in Iran’s Ahmadinejad’s 2003 election as mayor of 2005 Presidential elections shocked both Tehran. Iranians and the West. “Winner in Iran calls The election of Ahmadinejad was only the for Unity; Reformists Reel,” headlined The latest in a series of surprises that Iran has New York Times.1 Most Western produced in recent decades. Indeed, a review governments assumed that former President of Iran's history over the last thirty years and Expediency Council chairman Ali Akbar suggests that Iran excels at surprising its own Hashemi Rafsanjani would win. 2 Many people and the world. This does not mean academics also were surprised. Few paid any that history will be repeated. But it is worth heed to the former blacksmith’s son who rose bearing in mind that nearly three decades to become mayor of Tehran. Brown after the shah's grip on power began to falter, University anthropologist William O.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Situation of Human Rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Prepared by the Special Representative of the Commission on Human Rights, Mr
    UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council E/CN.4/1996/59 21 March 1996 ENGLISH ONLY COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Fifty-second session Item 10 of the provisional agenda QUESTION OF THE VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS IN ANY PART OF THE WORLD, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO COLONIAL AND OTHER DEPENDENT COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES Report on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran, prepared by the Special Representative of the Commission on Human Rights, Mr. Maurice Copithorne (Canada), pursuant to Commission resolution 1995/68 of 8 March 1995 and Economic and Social Council decision 1995/279 of 25 July 1995 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page I. INTRODUCTION................... 1- 26 4 A. Position of human rights in the world today . 3 - 6 4 B. Special Representative’s sources ...... 7- 10 5 C. Activities of the Special Representative . 11 - 16 6 D. Correspondence ............... 17- 18 7 E. Underlying questions ............ 19 7 F. Preliminary comments on the Special Representative’s visit to the Islamic Republic of Iran .......... 20- 26 8 GE.96-11290 (E) E/CN.4/1996/59 page 2 CONTENTS (continued) Paragraphs Page II. LEGAL SYSTEM................... 27- 57 9 A. Rights of an accused ............ 28- 29 9 B. Court system ................ 30- 35 10 C. Selection and training of judges ...... 36- 40 11 D. Clerical courts ............... 41 12 E. Punishments ................. 42- 50 13 F. Independent Bar Association ......... 51- 54 14 G. Atmosphere of the law ............ 55- 57 15 III. STATUS OF WOMEN ................. 58- 64 16 IV. THE FATWA AGAINST SALMAN RUSHDIE......... 65- 67 17 V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iran-USA Crise a 52’ Documentary Directed by Ben Salama & Naoufel Brahimi El Mili Produced by Kuiv Productions
    444 days The Iran-USA crise A 52’ documentary Directed by Ben Salama & Naoufel Brahimi El Mili Produced by Kuiv Productions PROVISIONAL DELIVERY : OCTOBER 2020 Summary A 444-day ordeal for American diplomats taken This film tells the story of events which unfolded hostage in Tehran, 444 days of humiliation for the from 4 November 1979 to 20 January 1981, a defining world’s greatest power, the United States, and 444 episode of the last half of the 20th century, and one days of fanaticism for the Iranian Islamists who were which marked the beginning of the conflict between imposing their will on their country and the world. the United States and its former ally, Iran. Writers’ note The American hostage crisis in Iran was an episode seize exclusive political power. of heightened tension in international relations The second event was the signing of the Camp David between the United States and Iran, which began on Accords on 26 March between Egypt and Israel 4 November 1979 and ended on 20 January 1981. For – the date on which Egyptian Islamists turned to 444 days, or nearly 15 months, 56 American diplomats radical struggle against Anwar Al-Sadat. The latter and civilians were held hostage by Iranian students in was assassinated in October 1981 in a spectacular the U.S. Embassy in Tehran. operation, whose mastermind was none other than This hostage-taking was part of a long series of events Ayman Al-Zawahiri, the current leader of Al Qaeda. that reshaped first the Arab-Muslim world, and then On 20 November 1979, hostages were seized in later the rest of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Role of State Identity in Foreign Policy Decision-Making
    The London School of Economics and Political Science UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF STATE IDENTITY IN FOREIGN POLICY DECISION-MAKING The Rise and Demise of Saudi–Iranian Rapprochement (1997–2009) ADEL ALTORAIFI A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics and Political Science for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy London, October 2012 1 To Mom and Dad—for everything. 2 DECLARATION I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. The final word count of this thesis, including titles, footnotes and in-text citations, is 105,889 words. 3 ABSTRACT The objective of the thesis is to study the concept of state identity and its role in foreign policy decision-making through a constructivist analysis, with particular focus on the Saudi–Iranian rapprochement of 1997. While there has been a recent growth in the study of ideational factors and their effects on foreign policy in the Gulf, state identity remains understudied within mainstream International Relations (IR), Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA), and even Middle Eastern studies literature, despite its importance and manifestation in the region’s foreign policy discourses. The aim is to challenge purely realist and power-based explanations that have dominated the discourse on Middle Eastern foreign policy—and in particular, the examination of Saudi–Iranian relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Musicians and Dancers in Post-Revolution Iran
    Negotiating a Position: Women Musicians and Dancers in Post-Revolution Iran Parmis Mozafari Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Music January 2011 The candidate confIrms that the work submitted is her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. 2011 The University of Leeds Parmis Mozafari Acknowledgment I would like to express my gratitude to ORSAS scholarship committee and the University of Leeds Tetly and Lupton funding committee for offering the financial support that enabled me to do this research. I would also like to thank my supervisors Professor Kevin Dawe and Dr Sita Popat for their constructive suggestions and patience. Abstract This research examines the changes in conditions of music and dance after the 1979 revolution in Iran. My focus is the restrictions imposed on women instrumentalists, dancers and singers and the ways that have confronted them. I study the social, religious, and political factors that cause restrictive attitudes towards female performers. I pay particular attention to changes in some specific musical genres and the attitudes of the government officials towards them in pre and post-revolution Iran. I have tried to demonstrate the emotional and professional effects of post-revolution boundaries on female musicians and dancers. Chapter one of this thesis is a historical overview of the position of female performers in pre-modern and contemporary Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran, Country Information
    Iran, Country Information COUNTRY ASSESSMENT - IRAN April 2003 Country Information and Policy Unit I SCOPE OF DOCUMENT II GEOGRAPHY III HISTORY IV STATE STRUCTURES VA HUMAN RIGHTS - OVERVIEW VB HUMAN RIGHTS - SPECIFIC GROUPS VC HUMAN RIGHTS - OTHER ISSUES ANNEX A - CHRONOLOGY ANNEX B - POLITICAL ORGANISATIONS ANNEX C - PROMINENT PEOPLE ANNEX D - REFERENCES TO SOURCE MATERIAL 1. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1. This assessment has been produced by the Country Information and Policy Unit, Immigration and Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a wide variety of recognised sources. The document does not contain any Home Office opinion or policy. 1.2. The assessment has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum/human rights determination process. The information it contains is not exhaustive. It concentrates on the issues most commonly raised in asylum/human rights claims made in the United Kingdom. 1.3. The assessment is sourced throughout. It is intended to be used by caseworkers as a signpost to the source material, which has been made available to them. The vast majority of the source material is readily available in the public domain. 1.4. It is intended to revise the assessment on a six-monthly basis while the country remains within the top 35 asylum-seeker producing countries in the United Kingdom. 2. GEOGRAPHY 2.1. The Islamic Republic of Iran Persia until 1935 lies in western Asia, and is bounded on the north by the file:///V|/vll/country/uk_cntry_assess/apr2003/0403_Iran.htm[10/21/2014 9:57:59 AM] Iran, Country Information Caspian Sea, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan, by Turkey and Iraq to the west, by the Persian Arabian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman to the south, and by Pakistan and Afghanistan to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran 441 Police Killed, Tortured and Otherwise Abused Both Criminal Suspects and Other Per- Sons.”It Also Said That Prison Conditions Remained Poor
    Egypt/Iran 441 police killed, tortured and otherwise abused both criminal suspects and other per- sons.”It also said that prison conditions remained poor. In its Annual Report on International Religious Freedom for 2002, released in October, the State Department said that “there was a continued trend toward improvement in the Government’s respect for religious freedom,”but that certain abuses and restrictions remained. It said that the government “continued to prose- cute for unorthodox religious beliefs and practices under the charge of ‘insulting heavenly religions.’” Secretary of State Colin Powell visited Egypt in early April as part of a wider Middle East tour. Talks held with President Mubarak and government officials focused on the revival of the Middle East peace process in the context of the dete- riorating security situation in Israel and the Palestinian Authority areas. The con- tinued violence between Israelis and Palestinians also dominated talks between President Mubarak and President Bush when the former visited Washington, D.C., in early June. RELEVANT HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH REPORTS: The State of Egypt vs. Free Expression: the Ibn Khaldun Trial, 01/02 IRAN HUMAN RIGHTS DEVELOPMENTS Human rights progress in Iran was caught in a continuing political power strug- gle between popularly elected reformers, who controlled both the presidency and Parliament, and clerical conservatives, who exercised authority through the office of the Leader (held by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei), the Council of Guardians, the judi- ciary,and the armed forces.Despite landslide electoral victories in every major elec- tion from 1997 to 2002, the reformers were unable to dislodge repressive policies favored by the clerical leadership, including far-reaching restrictions on freedom of expression, association, and political participation.
    [Show full text]
  • Akbar Ganji Born 31 January 1960 in Qazvin) Is an Iranian , یجنگ ربکا :Akbar Ganji (Persian Journalist and Writer
    Akbar Ganji born 31 January 1960 in Qazvin) is an Iranian , یجنگ ربکا :Akbar Ganji (Persian journalist and writer. He was arrested on April 22, 2000 after he took part in a conference held in Berlin on April 7 and 8, 2000. He was imprisoned in Evin Prison in Tehran until his release on March 18, 2006. [1] He holds a Masters degree in Communications. He is the winner of the 2006 World Association of Newspapers' prestigious Golden Pen of Freedom Award.[2]. He is also the winner of the 2006 Martin Ennals Award. [3] Contents • 1 Imprisonment • 2 Writings • 3 Iran's democratic voice • 4 Awards and honors • 5 See also • 6 External links Imprisonment Growing up in a poor district of southern Tehran, Ganji was initially enthused by the 1979 Revolution. He became a member of Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps and worked at the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance. But after becoming disillusioned with the regime, he took to journalism, becoming increasingly critical of the regime's suppression of human rights. Ganji took part in a conference in Berlin held by Heinrich Boell Foundation under the title "Iran after the elections" held in the wake of the Majlis elections of February 2000 which resulted in a huge victory by reformist candidates. The gathering was termed "anti-Islamic" and "anti-revolutionary" by Iranian state TV, IRIB, which broadcast part of the conference on April 18, 2000. He was accused of having "damaged national security" and initially sentenced to ten years followed by five years internal exile, which meant he would be kept in a specific city other than Tehran and could not leave the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Hello Salaam
    WHO’S AFRAID OF IRAN? AZAR NAFISI, SHIRIN NESHAT, ROYA HAKAKIAN, AZADEH MOAVENI, SORAYA BROUKHIM, SUSSAN DEYHIM, NAGHMEH ZARBAFIAN, AND LILA AZAM ZANGANEH April 19, 2006 Celeste Bartos Forum The New York Public Library WWW.NYPL.ORG/LIVE SORAYA BROUCKHIM: Hello. Salaam. Hello. My name is Soraya Brouckhim. I will be reading from My Sister, Guard your Veil; My Brother, Guard Your Eyes: Uncensored Iranian Voices. I will be reading two excerpts. And here we go. “How Can One be Persian?” by Marjane Satrapi. “We are set, stuck, really, somewhere between Scheherazade’s famed 1001 Nights and the bearded terrorist, with his manic wife disguised as a pro. By way of flattery we are told that we are Persians, and that Persia was a great empire. Otherwise, we are Iranians. The Persians are in Montesquieu’s writings and Delacroix’s paintings, and they smoke opium with Victor Hugo. As for Iranians, they take American hostages, they detonate bombs, and they are pissed at the West. They were discovered after the 1979 Revolution. (laughter) To begin with, let me remember that ‘Persia’ is the Greek terminology for Iran. The Greeks chose this name for our country because when Greece became a powerful nation, Iran was ruled by the Achaemenids, who were Persians, since they dwelled in the regions of Persis. But, Iran, for the last four thousand years, and for all Iranians, has always been Iran and it was actually Reza Shah, the last Shah’s father, who in 1935 requested that every European refer to our country by its real name, Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Month of January: Intensification of Conflicts Between Different Projects in Iran and the Rise of the Global Confederation of Iranian Students (GCIS)
    Shiva Tabari February 2020 The Long month of January: intensification of conflicts between different projects in Iran and the Rise of the Global Confederation of Iranian Students (GCIS) There are moments in history, due to a myriad of events, shifts in the (e)motion of people, and simultaneity of social movements, that participants have a strange feeling of intensification of time. Any day endures as much as a week, every week appears as a month or so. It is unbelievable for people that this amount of change and events have happened only during a week or so. This amount of conflict and clash of ideas, bodies, projects should happen in several years or maybe more. Hence, if people in (so-called) Western countries like Australia, which have a relatively stable country, want to understand the everyday life of Iranians in January 2020 and learn from our experience, they have, first of all, to imagine themselves in a situation that all of the sad news they hear during some years, all of anger they feel due to misbehavior of their ruling class, all of their nightmares about another world war and losing their normal life, all their hopes and hopelessness, and also all of the social/political activities which they do during many years (demonstration, strike, signing a petition etc.), have been compacted and concentrated in a single month. I call it intensification of history. Possibly, an element of a revolutionary situation. I am sure that Iranian people had the same feeling during the September of 1941 when both the Allies and the Soviet Union invaded Iran, occupied Tehran and forcibly abdicated Reza Pahlavi and assigned his son (Mohammadreza), a puppet, as the King.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran March 2009
    COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION REPORT IRAN 17 MARCH 2009 UK Border Agency COUNTRY OF ORIGIN INFORMATION SERVICE IRAN 17 MARCH 2009 Contents Preface Latest News EVENTS IN IRAN, FROM 2 FEBRUARY 2009 TO 16 MARCH 2009 REPORTS ON IRAN PUBLISHED OR ACCESSED BETWEEN 2 FEBRUARY 2009 TO 16 MARCH 2009 Paragraphs Background Information 1. GEOGRAPHY ......................................................................................... 1.01 Maps .............................................................................................. 1.03 Iran............................................................................................. 1.03 Tehran ....................................................................................... 1.04 2. ECONOMY ............................................................................................ 2.01 Sanctions ...................................................................................... 2.13 3. HISTORY ............................................................................................... 3.01 Calendar ........................................................................................ 3.02 Pre 1979......................................................................................... 3.03 1979 to 1999 .................................................................................. 3.05 2000 to date................................................................................... 3.16 Student unrest .............................................................................
    [Show full text]