The Eavesdroppers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Eavesdroppers Britain's largest spy network organis- cations between them, Each country's Mozambique to monitor the Frelimo retum=tbey had been flying a 'pro- ation is 1I0t MI5 or MI6 but an electron- signals intelligence (SIGINT) agency guerillas. (Information on the signals vocative' mission into the Soviet k intdli",ence network controlled from has authority to monitor communi- and positions of Frelimo transmitter> Caspian Sea Special Missile Test Range a country town ill {lie Corswords. With .cations HI one area. Lurope west of the was then passed on to the Portuguese and on to test the Soviet air defences. the huge US National Security Agency Urals and Africa come under Britain's via NATO.) Deliberate intrusion into foreign as partner, it intercepts and decodes representative in the UKUSA pact- . In Cyprus ten years earlier, Foreign territory is not new. In 1958, two communications throughout the world. Government Communications Head~ Office radio teams were also found to be Oxford University students exposed Freelance writer Duncan Campbell and quarters, known as GCHQ. operating in interesting proximity to the some of Britain's clandestine intel- Mark Ilosenball trace the rise to power monitoring station and the BBC there. ligence gathering in an article in the • of the electronic eavesdroppers, After the abortive Suez operation the University magazine, lsis: Theyde- RAF Chicksands, between Bedford and Foreign Office-furious with the BBC's scribed a fleet of spy boats manned by. Hitchin, could be a pleasant day trip . calm objectivity-took over a British '." Germans and captained by Britons, from London. The sixteenth century priory is open, and you won't be dis- PoIiciR,IM .irw.... A senes of fixed POS1Office and turbed by overflying aircraft. Instead I The Home Office is the only British Home orn« monitoring stations 011$.0 I Chicksands is dominated bya giant hill- Olgency with a legal ri~1 to monitor liskn out fer illicit transmi~ion$. The top monolith, a steel circle a quarter communications. The Home Offke's equipmenl is similar to the open Inter- Radio Technology Directorate carries ference Division, but the activities arc mile wide. Not far ofT, in a long low out several monitoring tasks to keep mprc concealed. Around London.a chain building, 200 operators of the United '.the alrwavcs free of pollution-and of direction finding aerials can be used States Air Force Security Service sit illcgll transnuucrs, The Radio Tcch- to track down pirates and others. Such over radios monitoring the ether from nolcgy Directorate employ 400 PuSI stations are at Ewell, near Epsom. Office .radio officers thcoui;hcut Sanderstead near Croydon, Friaton in their giant 'Steelhenge'. Britain to track down an unwanted Essex. and elsewhere around Britain. I Chicksands is the la rgest listening Home Office ~terfe~;~ tracing is done signal, lis Interference Division Ir.lCCS One is even on the roof of the Director- post in Britain of the US National over 40,(0) complaints of Interference ate~, Headquuters at Waterloo Brid-ge by a fleet of 3~O specially equipped a year all for the price of it form filled House. Security Agency. NSA is responsible vans. The larger ones carry a 30 foot in at the 1"".1 Pest Office, With 300 At Baldock in Hertfordshire. the for directing American intelligence from telescope mast with directional aerials spccl4Il vans, many equipped with tele- Home Office runs an 'International satellites to spy ships. Last summer, scopk direction finding aertats and Frequency Monitoring Station' called and wide coverage receiving equipment special surveillance equipment, they Radconrrcl, which fulfils Britain's treaty former CIA director William Colby to pinpoint any interfering signal. can trJ..:k down sources of interference. obliganons to check on interference told a US Senate Committee that NSA In important cases, such as the lime I caused to radio overseas. With two monitorcd zs? phone call. to and from rrorn two modern office blocks on local factory W3S accidentally ja.~ming direction findmg substations in the I communications to aircraft landing at south of England, Radcontrol is the iJ.; rs, ::l!.;t~cpted ce;:\!~:';f~.alccm- HIe outskirts of Cr.e!~enharr., the direc- Manchester, they have spent six mouths HorN Office's communications Interpol. muncations, and raided embassies for tors of GCHQ manage a world-wide pinning down tbe source or dzngerous investigating complaints of serious 15ng I codebooks. network of listening posts. They have interference. rollge inferre~ce. I No cue is immune.not eVe;, America's directed aircraft and ships into foreign closest allies. Former NSA analyst air and sea space to obtain information Winslow Peck (belo .•••·)worked in the late on their communications and defences The listening posts are often found if the most remote places-Cyprus, Hong Kong. Singapore, Oman.Belize, St Helena, the Ascension Islands. and Botswana among others. Another' base was recently identified in Australia On.very ••••""teng11l when after a typhoon hit Darwin; large The Composite Sib'l1als Organisation ""••s numbers of RAF personnel were dis- set up in Iq6J 10 bring all clandestine radio and monilorin~ operations under covered on a nearby off-shore island. control of GC'ftQ. Two of lrs sttes ere The GCHQ network comprises an v.:ithin ten miles of Belfast, and may be estimated 50 stations. In 1963 it won a involved in monitoring (RA udio. At Morwenstow, near Bude,"Comwall secret battle to take control of all army, two lOQ.foot urellitr terminals report- air force, and navy monitoring and edly receive pictures from 'American clandestine radio stations. reconnaissance satellites, GCHQ's director Bill Bonsall, M<>St.if not .11. of the Composite sixties at the US Air Force installation Signals Organisation stations in Britain- near Istanbul, another station in the although nominally responsible to the and there are mort overseas-Ire in- chain of 12 key NSA sites that includes Foreign Office, sits on the Joint Intel- volved in monitoring the airwa"es, using Chicksands, On a recent visit to Britain ligence Committee and probably works computer controlled radio recervers. At Poundon, near Bkester in Oxford- he described to Time Out top secret lists for Cabinet intelligence chiefs. Hi5 pre- shire, a well-guarded radio station of monitored UK commercial corn- decessor, Sir Leonard Hooper, KCMG, marked 'Foreign and Commonwealth munications kept at the Turkish site. now works in the" Cabinet Office after Office' is situated miles from the neat-" est t own, Two long sheds inside a Called TEXT A, these lists revealed that 32 years with GCHQ-a clear indication fenced-off compound hou se the listen- the UK business communications were of the modern pre-ernincnce of SIGINT. ers and their radio sets. while outside apparently being intercepted from east- But since the Labour government took stands one of Plessey's 'Pusher' aerials for direction finding. and much other em England. power in 1974, GCHQ's secret budget sophisticated equipment. Another ex·NSA serviceman, who has been reduced, and its listening posts served three years in Chicksands recent- east of Suez considered for closure. ly, described how British representatives The worldwide intelligence collec- SIS undercover anti-Nasser station to sailing under Swedish colours. These were effectively excluded from checking tion by GCHQ provides Britain with run the 'Voice Of Britain', which re- made regular patrols in Russian terri- on NSA work-and how one of two key considerable power. At Francistown layed the Foreign Office view in op- torial waters. On one occasion, a British monitoring controllers were responsible in Botswana, the RAF operates an position to the BBC. The radio side captain took his boat into Leningrad for in tcrcepting communications from electronic intelligence base on behalf of Britain s dirty. tricks agencies are harbour, The authors, who had worked France! of GCHQ, which, with powerful apparently run by the Composite in a Royal Navy monitoring station in NSA is partnercd in a worldwide antennae, can monitor the signals of Signals Organisation «('SO), which is Germany, were sentenced to six months electronic intelligence pact by four guerilla movements and government run by the ubiquitous G(,HQ. imprisonment shortly afterwards for other powers: Britain, Canada, forces from its strategic position in In the early '60s, according to Peck, breaking the Official Secrets Act. Australia and New Zealand. By a 1947 the centre of Southern Africa. They arc two RAF aircraft equipped with elec- Their article also identified a 'chain secret agreement, UKUSA, these five much better placed than the NSA, who, tronic intelligence equipment took off of monitoring stations Ir om Iraq to the Engli~;h'~peakin!! nations have divided according to WinsL)w Peck, har to use a frnm J base on the Caspian seacoast of Baltic-vi» flagrant breach CIf 'he Ccneva the rnorntor ing of the world's communi, Pueblo type Spy ship on patro! off Iran. The planes and their crew didn't convention'. The stations recorded the effects when British and American air- GCHQ. In 1968 they set up a new corn- record and analyse it, army arid GCHQ same for GCIlQ. In Germany bored craft (lcw over the borders to trigger pany called Racal (Slough) specifically electronic warfare experts can simulate intercept operators sitting in front of OtT;1 Soviet response. These nights were to manufacture secret communications the 'quite sophisticated' control signal- their dials and switches would forget conducted regularly='there is no con- equipment in co-operation with the making the bomb go off prematurely. about the Soviet Air Force and tune It'Olling the appetite of the statistical government. In just four years Racal Or they can devise a way of jamming along the band for the orchestra from analysers at Cheltenham,' the students (Sloughj's turnover grew sixfold.
Recommended publications
  • History, It Is Checkered
    Historical Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 23:30:10 +0500 From: "Chuck Rippel" <crippel@...> Subject: [R-390] BA Receiver Fun - Targets Thanks for the many notes I received about posting some targets for our BA receivers. I was astounded at the number of affirmative replies received. As many know, I find listening a great deal of fun and very challenging. There are basically two styles of listening. Short Wave Listening is where the operator tunes in to a particular program. Short Wave Broadcast DX'ing is listening for very weak or seasonally challenging radio broadcasts or stations. In most cases, the language used by the broadcaster is not english as they are serving the local population. It is DX'ing v/s Listening where I intend to focus. Being a good SWBC DX'er is a bit like being a good detective. Various clues are pieced together to arrive at a conclusion. In our case, identifying an unknown station. Some of those clues are: Time Frequency Language Programming Music Style Time: Audibility of a station depends on the time it is broadcasting and the frequency it is on. Typically, the frequencies over 10 mhz are best during local day light and below, local dark. Signals below 7 mhz generally require darkness between the transmitter and receiver locations. However, not always and we will explore the opportunities when that rule can be expanded a bit. Frequency: Armed with the time and knowledge of propagation, frequency is the next big clue. There is general frequency consideration or band consideration. An example might be if a station on 4915 were being heard at 2200UTC on the East Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • International Default Location Field the Country Column Displays The
    Country Descr Country Descr AUS CAIRNS BEL KLEINE BROGEL AUS CANBERRA BEL LIEGE AUS DARWIN, NORTHERN BEL MONS TERRITOR Belgium BEL SHAPE/CHIEVRES AUS FREMANTLE International Default Location Field BEL ZAVENTEM AUS HOBART Australia BEL [OTHER] AUS MELBOURNE The Country column displays the most BLZ BELIZE CITY AUS PERTH commonly used name in the United States of BLZ BELMOPAN AUS RICHMOND, NSW Belize America for another country. The Description BLZ SAN PEDRO AUS SYDNEY column displays the Default Locations for Travel BLZ [OTHER] AUS WOOMERA AS Authorizations. BEN COTONOU AUS [OTHER] Benin BEN [OTHER] AUT GRAZ Country Descr Bermuda BMU BERMUDA AUT INNSBRUCK AFG KABUL (NON-US FACILITIES, Bhutan BTN BHUTAN AUT LINZ AFG KABUL Austria BOL COCHABAMBA AUT SALZBURG AFG MILITARY BASES IN KABUL BOL LA PAZ AUT VIENNA Afghanistan AFG MILITARY BASES NOT IN BOL SANTA CRUZ KABU AUT [OTHER] Bolivia BOL SUCRE AFG [OTHER] (NON-US FACILITIES AZE BAKU Azerbaijan BOL TARIJA AFG [OTHER] AZE [OTHER] BOL [OTHER] ALB TIRANA BHS ANDROS ISLAND (AUTEC & Albania OPB BIH MIL BASES IN SARAJEVO ALB [OTHER] BHS ANDROS ISLAND Bosnia and BIH MIL BASES NOT IN SARAJEVO DZA ALGIERS Herzegovina Algeria BHS ELEUTHERA ISLAND BIH SARAJEVO DZA [OTHER] BHS GRAND BAHAMA ISLAND BIH [OTHER] American Samoa ASM AMERICAN SAMOA BHS GREAT EXUMA ISL - OPBAT BWA FRANCISTOWN Andorra AND ANDORRA Bahamas SI BWA GABORONE AGO LUANDA BHS GREAT INAGUA ISL - OPBAT Angola Botswana BWA KASANE AGO [OTHER] S BWA SELEBI PHIKWE ATA ANTARCTICA REGION POSTS BHS NASSAU BWA [OTHER] Antarctica ATA MCMURDO STATION
    [Show full text]
  • The First Americans the 1941 US Codebreaking Mission to Bletchley Park
    United States Cryptologic History The First Americans The 1941 US Codebreaking Mission to Bletchley Park Special series | Volume 12 | 2016 Center for Cryptologic History David J. Sherman is Associate Director for Policy and Records at the National Security Agency. A graduate of Duke University, he holds a doctorate in Slavic Studies from Cornell University, where he taught for three years. He also is a graduate of the CAPSTONE General/Flag Officer Course at the National Defense University, the Intelligence Community Senior Leadership Program, and the Alexander S. Pushkin Institute of the Russian Language in Moscow. He has served as Associate Dean for Academic Programs at the National War College and while there taught courses on strategy, inter- national relations, and intelligence. Among his other government assignments include ones as NSA’s representative to the Office of the Secretary of Defense, as Director for Intelligence Programs at the National Security Council, and on the staff of the National Economic Council. This publication presents a historical perspective for informational and educational purposes, is the result of independent research, and does not necessarily reflect a position of NSA/CSS or any other US government entity. This publication is distributed free by the National Security Agency. If you would like additional copies, please email [email protected] or write to: Center for Cryptologic History National Security Agency 9800 Savage Road, Suite 6886 Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755 Cover: (Top) Navy Department building, with Washington Monument in center distance, 1918 or 1919; (bottom) Bletchley Park mansion, headquarters of UK codebreaking, 1939 UNITED STATES CRYPTOLOGIC HISTORY The First Americans The 1941 US Codebreaking Mission to Bletchley Park David Sherman National Security Agency Center for Cryptologic History 2016 Second Printing Contents Foreword ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Air Force (County) Football Association
    Royal Air Force (County) Football Association Oicial Handbook 2017-18 Handbook 2017-18 Table of Contents Page Foreword 6 Board of Trustees and Officers 12 Leagues 16 Royal Air Force (County) Football Association 17 Regional Directors and OIC Contacts 20 Objects, Membership and Affiliation of the Association 31 Respect - Codes of Conduct 35 Association Regulations - Travel 39 Rules and Regulations - General 41 Rules and Regulations - Competitions 47 Matches against Foreign Clubs 53 On-Field Disciplinary Procedures 56 Football Debt Recovery 73 Disciplinary Commissions and Appeal Boards 75 Disciplinary Procedures Dealt with by Affiliated Associations 78 Regulations for FA Appeals 81 Safeguarding Adults at Risk 86 Kit and Advertising Regulations 94 Third Generation (3G) Football Turf Pitches 102 The Football Association Equality Policy 103 Referees- Roll of Officers 104 Referees' Committee 105 Guide to Marking Referees 106 Rules Governing RAF Referees 107 Regulations for the Registration and Control of Referees 122 Goalpost Safety Guidelines 138 Goalpost and Pitch Sizes 139 Guidance Notes on Line Marking of Football Pitches 141 Inter-Service Champions 144 Inter-Service Champions (Ladies) 145 Inter-Service Champions (U23) 146 President's Cup Winners 147 Jubilee Cup Winners 148 RAF FA Challenge Cup Winners 149 RAF FA Junior Challenge Cup Winners 150 RAF Inter League / Inter Region (White Cup) Winners 151 RAF FA Festival of Football Winners 152 RAF FA Ladies Inter-Station Cup Winners 153 RAF FA Veterans Cup Winners 154 RAF FA Club of the Year
    [Show full text]
  • Four Decades Airfield Research Group Magazine
    A IRFIELD R ESEARCH G ROUP M AGAZINE . C ONTENTS TO J UNE 2017 Four Decades of the Airfield Research Group Magazine Contents Index from December 1977 to June 2017 1 9 7 7 1 9 8 7 1 9 9 7 6 pages 28 pages 40 pages © Airfield Research Group 2017 2 0 0 7 2 0 1 7 40 pages Version 2: July 2017 48 pages Page 1 File version: July 2017 A IRFIELD R ESEARCH G ROUP M AGAZINE . C ONTENTS TO J UNE 2017 AIRFIELD REVIEW The Journal of the Airfield Research Group The journal was initially called Airfield Report , then ARG Newsletter, finally becoming Airfield Review in 1985. The number of pages has varied from initially just 6, occasio- nally to up to 60 (a few issues in c.2004). Typically 44, recent journals have been 48. There appear to have been three versions of the ARG index/ table of contents produced for the magazine since its conception. The first was that by David Hall c.1986, which was a very detailed publication and was extensively cross-referenced. For example if an article contained the sentence, ‘The squadron’s flights were temporarily located at Tangmere and Kenley’, then both sites would appear in the index. It also included titles of ‘Books Reviewed’ etc Since then the list has been considerably simplified with only article headings noted. I suspect that to create a current cross-reference list would take around a day per magazine which equates to around eight months work and is clearly impractical. The second version was then created in December 2009 by Richard Flagg with help from Peter Howarth, Bill Taylor, Ray Towler and myself.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES-Tuesday, August 7, 1984
    22660 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE August 7, 1984 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES-Tuesday, August 7, 1984 CONFERENCE REPORT ON H.R. Fort Jackson, South Carolina, $35, 760,000. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 5604 Fort Knox, Kentucky, $13, 600, 000. Cold Regions Laboratory, New Hampshire, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, $11,000,000. $3,600,000. Pursuant to the order of Monday, Fort Lee, Virginia, $1,150,000. BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM COMMAND August 6, Mr. PRICE submitted the fol­ Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, $6,450,000. lowing conference report and state­ Fort McClellan, Alabama, $6,300,000. Various locations, $12,800,000. ment on the bill <H.R. 5604) to author­ Fort Pickett, Virginia, $2,400,000. CLASSIFIED PROJECTS Fort Rucker, Alabama, $2,600,000. Various locations, $3,800,000. ize certain construction at military in­ Fort Sill, Oklahoma, $27,400,000. stallations for fiscal year 1985, and for Fort Story, Virginia, $6,100,000. OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES other purposes: MILITARY DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON UNITED STATES ARMY, JAPAN CONFERENCE REPORT CH. REPT. No. 98-962) Fort Myer, Virginia, $700,000. Japan, $1,900,000. The committee of conference on the dis­ UNITED STATES ARMY MATERIEL DEVELOPMENT EIGHTH UNITED STATES ARMY agreeing votes of the two Houses on the AND READINESS COMMAND Korea, $115,840,000. amendment of the Senate to the bill <H.R. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, UNITED STATES ARMY, SOUTHERN COMMAND 5604) to authorize certain construction at $65,400,000. Military installations for fiscal year 1985, Anniston Army Depot, Alabama, Honduras, $4,300,000. and for other purposes, having met, after $4,500,000.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force Security Service (USAFSS) on 20 October 1948, Before Even Five Months Had Passed
    The USAFSS Command Emblem Symbolizes the command mission. It consists of a shield divided equally into quarters by a vertical and horizontal line and identifying scroll. Significant of the command’s worldwide influence, the first quarter is blue, thereon a green sphere with yellow land markings. Pertinent to transmission, the second quarter is red, thereon a yellow lightning streak. Significant of the United States Air Force, the third quarter is yellow, thereon a blue half wing. Symbolic of protection and security, the fourth quarter is blue, thereon over a sword with point to base (hilt and pommel yellow), a white shield, thereon a yellow flame shaded red. The emblem was approved by Headquarters USAF in August 1952. On a field of blue, a silver shield bearing a chesspiece is displayed over a blade of lightning, and identifying scroll is unfurled underneath. The blue field, as the dominant color, represents ESC’s Air Force subordination; to preserve the link with the Air Force Security Service emblem, whose principal color was blue; and symbolizes the valor and loyalty of the men and women of the command. The lightning blade of the sword is drawn from the USAFSS emblem to preserve tradition and to represent the identification with electronics. Connecting the bolt to a sword hilt suggests its transformation into a weapon, much as the more passive mission of USAFSS evolved into the active role with which ESC is charged. Immediate readiness of response is also embodied in the lightning bolt sword. The silver shield has its origin in the USAFSS emblem, denoting now, as then, both defense and the security resulting from that defense.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wedding of His Royal Highness Prince William Of
    THE WEDDING OF HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS PRINCE WILLIAM OF WALES, K.G. WITH MISS CATHERINE MIDDLETON 29th APRIL 2011 A SUMMARY OF INFORMATION AS OF 28th APRIL 2011 1 Contents as of 28/04/11 Page ​ ● The Service 3 ● Costs 3 ● Timings 4 ● Members of the Wedding Party 6 ● Invitations 7 ● Selected Guest List for the Wedding Service at Westminster Abbey 8 ● Westminster Abbey Seating Plan 16 ● The Route 19 ● Cars and Carriages 19 ● Music for the Wedding Service 22 ● Wedding Musicians 24 ● Floral Displays 26 ● Wedding Ring 28 ● Receptions 29 ● Wedding Cake 30 ● Official Photographer 31 ● Westminster Abbey 32 ● Ceremonial Bodies 39 ● Official Souvenir Wedding Programme 41 ● New Coat of Arms for Miss Catherine Middleton and her Family 43 ● Instrument of Consent 45 ● Gifts 46 ● Wedding Website 54 ● The Royal Wedding Online – On the day 55 ● Visitors to London 57 ● Ministry of Defence Royal Wedding Commentary 58 ● The Royal Wedding Policing Operation 88 ● Media logistics 91 ● Biographies o Prince William 92 o Catherine Middleton 95 o The Prince of Wales 96 o The Duchess of Cornwall 99 o Prince Harry 100 o Clergy 102 o Organist and Master of the Choristers, Westminster Abbey 105 ● The British Monarchy 106 o The Queen 106 o The Prince of Wales 107 o The Royal Family 108 2 The Service The marriage of Prince William and Miss Catherine Middleton will take place at Westminster Abbey on Friday 29th April 2011. The Dean of Westminster will conduct the service, the Archbishop of Canterbury will marry Prince William and Miss Middleton, and the Bishop of London will give the address.
    [Show full text]
  • Signals Intelligence
    29 April 1998 Thanks to Jeffrey T. Richelson and Ballinger The U.S. Intelligence Community Jeffrey T. Richelson New York, Ballinger, 1989 This excerpt from Second Edition (soft), pp. 167-197 Chapter 8 SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE Signals intelligence (SIGINT) is traditionally considered to be one of the most important and sensitive forms of intelligence. The interception of foreign signals can provide data on a nation's diplomatic, scientific, and economic plans or events as well as the characteristics of radars, spacecraft and weapons systems. SIGINT can be broken down into five components: • communications intelligence (COMINT) • electronics intelligence (ELINT) • radar intelligence (RADINT) • laser intelligence (LASINT) • non-imaging infrared. As its name indicates, COMINT is intelligence obtained by the interception, processing, and analysis of the communications of foreign governments or groups, excluding radio and television broadcasts. The communications may take a variety of forms--voice, Morse code, radio-teletype or facsimile. The communications may be encrypted, or transmitted in the clear. The targets of COMINT operations are varied. The most traditional COMINT target is diplomatic communications--the communications from each nation's capital to its diplomatic establishments around the world. The United States has intercepted and deciphered the diplomatic communications of a variety of nations-- Britain during the 1956 Suez Crisis, Libya's communications to its East Berlin People's Bureau prior to the bombing of a nightclub in West Berlin in 1985, Iraq's communications to its embassy in Japan in the 1970s. The United States also targets the communications between different components of a large number of governments. On some occasions both components are located within the country, on other occasions at least one is located outside national boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Branch NEWSBRIEF Hon. Secretary: Jim Davies
    INTERNATIONAL MILITARY MUSIC SOCIETY UK (Founder) Branch NEWSBRIEF Hon. Secretary: Jim Davies, Amberstone, Pyrford Road, Pyrford GU22 8UP Tel: 01932 355135 + email: [email protected] April 2011 Dear IMMS UK (Founder) Branch Member and Corporate Member, I do hope the following news will be of interest to you; please pass on this information to other IMMS members you may know who do not have access to Email. We regret to record the death, on 21 March, of Lieutenant-Colonel (Rtd) George Evans OBE, President Emeritus of our UK (Founder) Branch. As Director of Music at The Royal Military School of Music, Colonel George was instrumental in arranging that our branch meetings should take place at Kneller Hall. In his role as Branch President he maintained a close interest in Branch matters, in recognition of which he was appointed President Emeritus when he relinquished the presidency. The Colonel’s funeral was private; a memorial service is to be arranged and details will be announced in due course. A full obituary will appear in the June issue of our Newsletter. 1. Tuesday 26 April Lance Corporal Rachel Smith of the Band of the Coldstream Guards writes to remind me that the next recital at the Guards Chapel is on Tuesday 26 April at 13 05; it will feature two fantastic musicians, David Jones of the Welsh Guards Band accompanied by Emily Barker of the Irish Guards Band, playing works for marimba and vibraphone by Ney Rosauro, Christopher Norton, Ross Edwards and others. Rachel looks forward to welcoming you to the Guards Chapel, and hopes you will join her and her colleagues after the concert for light refreshments in the Guards Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • Base Structure Report Fiscal Year 1991
    AD-A242 825 DARC DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE L C BASE STRUCTURE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991 AUGUST 1990 0 OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (PRODUCTION AND LOGISTICS) 91 1112 094 Best Available COpy BASE STRUCTURE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991 -- -j'._4 44 no SUPPLEMENT TO THE FY 1991 PRESIDENT'S BUDGET PREPARED BY OFFICE OF TIE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (PRODUCTION AND LOGISTICS) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION PAGE Section I Reporting Requirement 1 Section II Content and Organization 1 Section III Service Base Structure Chapters 2 Section IV Base Operating Support Costs 3 Section V Base Closure and Realignment 3 Section VI Conclusion 4 CHAPTER TWO ARMY BASE STRUCTURE Section I Introduction 13 Section II Base Structure Overview 14 Section III Relationship of Base Structure to Force Structure 19 Section IV Base Operations Costs 25 Section V Actions to Reduce Annual Base Operations Costs 25 Section VI Army Base Structure 30 CHAPTER THREE NAVY BASE STRUCTURE Section I Introduction 43 Section II Base Structure Overview 41 Section III Relationship of Base Structure to Force Structure 45 Section IV Base Operations Costs 48 Section V Actions to Reduce Annual Base Operations Costs 48 Section VI Navy Base Structure :52 CHAPTER FOUR AIR FORCE BASE STRUCTURE Section I Introduction 63 Section II Base Structure Overview 64 Section III Relationship of Base Structure to Force Structure 70 Section IV Base Operations Costs 75 Section V Actions to Enhance Efficiencies and Reduce Costs 76 Section VI Air Force Base Structure 79 i CHAPTER FIVE MARINE CORPS BASE STRUCTURE Section I Introduction 97 Section II Base Structure Overview 97 Section III Relationship of Base Structure to Force Structure 101 Section IV Base operations Costs 105 Section V Actions to Reduce Annual Base Operations Costs 105 Section VI Marine Corps Base Structure 108 APPENDIX EUROPEAN BASES AtID COMMUNITIES U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • It Did Not Begin with Snowden
    It Did Not Begin With Snowden The Declassified History of American Intelligence Operations in Europe: 1945-2001 Matthew M. Aid, October 2014 Background article for Brill’s Research Collection U.S. Intelligence on Europe, 1945-1995. The online collection is available at http://primarysources.brillonline.com/browse/us-intelligence-on-europe. pg. 1 U.S. Intelligence on Europe – Background article Contents Introduction THE U.S. INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY’S 70-YEAR PRESENCE IN EUROPE U.S. INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS IN GERMANY, BRITAIN AND TURKEY • U.S. Intelligence Activities in West Germany and West Berlin • The U.S. Intelligence Presence in Great Britain • The Turkish Intelligence Facilities U.S. ESPIONAGE ACTIVITIES IN EASTERN EUROPE DURING THE COLD WAR • East Germany • Czechoslovakia • Hungary • Poland • Romania • Bulgaria • Albania SPYING ON AMERICA’S EUROPEAN FRIENDS AND ALLIES • France • Great Britain • West Germany • Norway • Spain • Italy • Greece • Turkey / Cyprus • Spying on the Picayune of Europe • Spying on the Western European Communist Parties • Economic Intelligence Gathering in Europe • Monitoring European Anti-Nuclear Groups in the 1980s INTELLIGENCE REPORTING ON EUROPE • Terrorism in Europe • Coverage of European Socio-Economic Issues pg. 2 U.S. Intelligence on Europe – Background article CHAPTER 1 Introduction The great thing about the study of history is that it is a dynamic process. Unlike the sciences, engineering and mathematics, there are no hard and fast rules to the study of history because it is forever changing as new information come to light. This is especially in true in the realm of intelligence history, one of the youngest but fastest growing areas of serious academic endeavor, where literally every day researchers around the world are unearthing formerly classified documentary materials on dusty shelves in archives and libraries that are changing, in some cases dramatically, our understanding of how and why certain world events happened the way they did.
    [Show full text]