BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 70(1): 233–240, 2002

TIGER ( TIGRIS): PROFILE OF A SPAWNING AGGREGATION

D. Byron White, David M. Wyanski, Brandon M. Eleby and Craig G. Lilyestrom

Throughout the Caribbean several large site-specific grouper spawning aggregations have been documented, including those of Nassau grouper ( striatus), red hind (E. guttatus), and tiger grouper (Mycteroperca tigris) (Domeier and Colin, 1997). All of these aggregations have received heavy fishing pressure, some to the extent of extermination (Aguilar-Perera and Aguilar-Davila, 1996; Sadovy and Eklund, 1999; Coleman et al., 2000; Sala et al., 2001). Unfortunately, because spawning aggregations are ephemeral events, frequently in remote places, our understanding of them is poor (Domeier and Colin, 1997). One of these poorly understood species is the tiger grouper, a moderate-sized serranid found in Bermuda, southern Florida, the western Gulf of Mexico, and throughout the West Indies to northern South America (Smith, 1971; Heemstra and Randall, 1993). Throughout their range, tiger grouper are infrequently captured; how- ever, for 2 d preceding and approximately 1 wk following each full moon during January through April, a spawning aggregation estimated to be several hundred individuals forms east of Vieques Island, Puerto Rico (Sadovy et al., 1994a). This aggregation has been heavily fished in recent years and landings have declined significantly (Matos and Posada, in press); however, most recently fishermen have reduced their efforts to harvest tiger grouper from this aggregation for reasons of safety (i.e., ‘the bends’) and to target more economically viable species (D. Matos, Puerto Rico Department of Natural and Environ- mental Resources, pers. comm.). There are currently no management regulations in place for tiger grouper. This paper provides a life-history ‘snapshot’ of tiger grouper present in this spawning aggregation on one moon, information that may be used in developing a management program.

METHODS

We obtained tiger grouper otoliths and gonads from 2 to 4 March 1994, 4 to 6 d following the full moon, from the commercial landings on Vieques Island. Specimens in the possession of wholesale dealers were randomly sampled, whereas all specimens in the possession of commercial fishermen were usually examined. A total of 89 specimens was collected by speargun using SCUBA or by hook and line from the spawning aggregation that occurred east of Vieques Island (18º 5'3''N, 65º10'3''W) at a depth of 35–45 m. In addition a fisherman reportedly caught several dozen tiger grouper at an aggregation south of Vieques (18º4'0''N, 65º20'3''W) but only allowed us to sample one specimen. We measured total length (mm TL) and whole weight (kg) for all specimens, and removed the left sagittal otolith from all but one specimen. Each otolith was embedded in Araldite®, and sectioned once along a dorsoventral plane through the focus with a single high-concentration diamond wheel on a Buehler® Isomet low-speed saw. Sections were mounted on glass slides using Crystalbond® thermoplastic. Otolith sections were immersed in cedarwood oil and examined under a dissecting microscope (50¥) using transmitted light. Two readers counted increments independently. If counts differed, both readers examined the otolith by projecting its image onto a video monitor. If no agreement could be reached, the otolith was removed from age and growth analysis.

233 234 BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, VOL. 70, NO. 1, 2002

The posterior portion of the gonad from each specimen was fixed in 10% seawater-formalin for 2 wks and transferred to 50% isopropanol for 2 wks. Gonads were processed with an Auto-Technicon® 2A Tissue Processor, vacuum infiltrated, and blocked in paraffin. Three transverse sections (6–8 mm thick) were cut from each sample with a rotary microtome, mounted on a glass slide, stained with double-strength Gill hematoxylin, and counter-stained with eosin-y. Two readers assessed sex and reproductive state using histological criteria (see McGovern et al., 1998), without reference to body length or date of capture. Mean observed size was compared between sexes using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Sex ratio between gear types was compared using the chi-square, c2) test. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS, and the results were considered significant if P was <0.05 (SAS Institute, Inc. 1985).

RESULTS

The commercial landings of tiger grouper from Vieques Island declined from 4962 kg in 1995 to 1719 kg in 1998 (Fig. 1), apparently due to decreased fishing effort. Our specimens were captured by hook and line (n = 69) and speargun (n = 21). Age estimates were determined for 80 of 89 (90%) of the sectioned tiger grouper otoliths. Specimens ranged in length from 320 to 642 mm TL ( x = 458; Fig. 2), and in age from 3 to 11 yrs, ( x = 7.0; Fig. 3). Males were larger than females in all age intervals, with males significantly larger than females overall (P < 0.0001, df = 86; Fig. 4). We determined sex and reproductive state for 88 of 90 specimens. No immature speci- mens were collected from the spawning aggregation. Fifty-two (59%) male and thirty-six (41%) female specimens were collected, for an overall sex ratio of 1.44:1 (Male:Female). Male tiger grouper were taken more often by hook and line (64%) than by speargun 2 (45%); however, there was no significant difference in sex ratio between gear types (c = 2.27, df = 1, P £ 0.20). Females were 320 to 480 mm TL ( x = 413 mm TL, SE =7) (Fig.

Figure 1. Commercial landings of tiger grouper from Vieques Island, Puerto Rico, as reported by Matos and Posada, (in press). Landings before 1995 were recorded as ‘grouper’ (all species). No data were available for 1999 and 2000. NOTES 235

Figure 2. Length-frequency of male and female tiger grouper captured from a spawning aggregation east of Vieques Island, Puerto Rico, March 1994.

2), and 3 to 9 yrs ( x = 6.4 yrs, SE = 6.3)(Fig. 3). Males were 360 to 642 mm TL ( x = 490 mm TL, SE = 7)(Fig. 2), and 5 to 11 yrs ( x = 7.6 yrs, SE = 6.8)(Fig. 3). All females and males were in the developing, recently spawned (presence of postovulatory follicles), or running ripe reproductive states; all females had vitellogenic oocytes. Oocytes with mi- gratory nuclei or oocytes that were hydrated were present in 21 of 36 (58%) females, indicating that these specimens would have spawned in the next 24 h (Hunter and Macewicz, 1985b; Fitzhugh et al., 1993). Postovulatory follicles (>24 h old), indicating a recent spawning event, were present in only two specimens. Light yellow to yellow- brown cell masses, called gamma and delta stages of oocyte atresia by Hunter and Macewicz (1985a), were present in testes of 39 of 52 (74%) males.

DISCUSSION

The tiger grouper spawning aggregation near Vieques Island has been fished since its discovery in the early 1980s. It is the only aggregation that has been surveyed and con- firmed (Sadovy et al., 1994a); however, there are reports of other tiger grouper aggrega- tions in the Caribbean (Fine, 1990). Although fishing effort and landings have declined (Matos and Posada, in press), there has been no detailed assessment to determine if con- tinued harvest can be supported. Luckhurst (1996) started a tag-recapture program to examine site fidelity and to determine the distances that tiger grouper might migrate to participate in the Vieques aggregation. Their presence in fishery landings is sparse out- side of the spawning season. 236 BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, VOL. 70, NO. 1, 2002

Figure 3. Age-frequency by sex of tiger grouper captured from a spawning aggregation east of Vieques Island, Puerto Rico, March 1994.

Tiger grouper aggregate to around the week of each full moon in January-April. All individuals collected from the March 1994 aggregation were examined histologically and found to have gonads in developing or running ripe condition. We collected no fe- male specimens under 320 mm TL (age 3). The only immature female (examined histo- logically) and smallest mature female collected by Sadovy et al. (1994a) were 205 mm SL (ca 241 mm TL) and 255 mm SL (ca 299 mm TL) respectively, which suggests that tiger grouper attain sexual maturity between 250–350 mm TL, at age 3. It is possible that maturity is attained as early as age 2, as Sadovy et al. (1994a) found that otolith sections from nine specimens between 257 and 423 mm SL (301–495 mm TL) had two to nine opaque zones. The frequency of increment formation in tiger grouper otoliths has not been validated, but increments in two related species, Mycteroperca microlepis (Harris and Collins, 2000) and Mycteroperca phenax (Harris et al., in press) as well as another Caribbean grouper, Epinephelus guttatus (Sadovy et al., 1992), were found to be depos- ited annually. Smith (1958) reported that the size versus sex distribution (females: <370 mm TL; males: >450 mm TL) of tiger grouper off Bermuda was thought to be indicative of protogyny. Our results, as well as Sadovy et al. (1994a) and Matos and Posada (in press), indicate that males are the larger and older individuals within the Vieques population, but the extensive overlaps in size and age frequencies between sexes are not strong indicators of protogyny (Sadovy and Shapiro, 1987). The strongest indicators that we observed were membrane-lined central cavities in testes, also observed by Smith (1959) and Sadovy et al. (1994a), and sperm sinuses in the gonad wall. Based on the criteria of Sadovy and NOTES 237

Figure 4. Mean observed size-at-age by sex of tiger grouper captured from a spawning aggregation east of Vieques Island, Puerto Rico, March 1994. Error bars represent ± 1 SE. The numbers below each error bar represent sample size.

Shapiro (1987), we cannot confirm protogyny in tiger grouper because transitional in- dividuals and early stages of oocyte atresia within testes have yet to be observed. Smith (1959) noted the presence of ‘regressive’ oocytes in the testes of functional males; how- ever, the stage of oocyte atresia was not described. Shapiro (1987) suggested that sex transition in protogynous is more socially mediated than size or age mediated, and may occur away from spawning aggregation sites. If tiger grouper are protogynous, this could possibly explain why transitional individuals have yet to be collected. Males seem to dominate the Vieques tiger grouper aggregation but this pattern could result from differential movement of the sexes into and out of the spawning aggregation as reported for E. guttatus (Sadovy et al., 1994b), or size selectivity of fishing methods. In 1995, Matos and Padilla (in press) examined gonads macroscopically and found the sex ratio to be 4.39: 1 (male:female). Matos and Posada (in press) examined gonads macroscopically and found the sex ratio to be 6.40:1 and 11.97:1 in 1997 and 1998 re- spectively; however, their smallest specimens, 385 mm TL in 1997 and 420 mm TL in 1998, were notably larger than in the present study. Our sex ratio value (1.44:1) is similar to that of Sadovy et al. (1994a) for mature specimens (1.31:1), but both of these studies have small sample sizes. Although Matos and Padilla (in press) used macroscopic exami- nation to assess sex, their sample size is much larger (n = 970) than those in other studies and the length range of specimens (260–760 mm TL) is probably more representative of the population. Increased fishing pressure is suspected to have caused moderate to potentially severe changes in life history patterns of two congeners, gag (M. microlepis) (McGovern et al., 238 BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, VOL. 70, NO. 1, 2002

1998; Harris and Collins, 2000) and scamp (M. phenax) (Coleman et al., 1996; Harris et al., in press). Even moderate increases in fishing mortality could reduce the reproductive capacity of protogynous groupers, by altering the sex ratio of adults, to the point of fail- ure (Huntsman and Schaaf, 1994). We are concerned about the tiger grouper aggregation because many aggregations of another serranid, the Nassau grouper, have disappeared after being intensively fished (Bannerot et al., 1987; Colin, 1992; Aguilar-Perera and Aguilar-Davila, 1996; Sala et al., 2001). Although fishing pressure seems to have de- creased (Matos and Posada, in press), an increased or continued exploitation of this tiger grouper aggregation could be detrimental to population demographics by altering the genetic composition of the stock, disrupting the social structure and changing the sex ratio to the point of reproductive failure (Coleman et al., 1999; Koenig et al., 2000). Until there is a better understanding of the tiger grouper life history, conservative management measures should be considered for the Vieques aggregation site during the spawning season. We recommend a Caribbean-wide monitoring of tiger grouper, including tagging and genetic studies, and specifically that the Vieques spawning aggregation be sampled periodically, perhaps biennially, to determine any changes in sex ratio, size-at-age, and size- or age-at-maturity. Length frequency should be assessed annually.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to offer special thanks to Puerto Rico Department of Natural and Environmental Resources employees J. Leon, J. Timber, P. Quinones, Captain F. Robles, and the many commercial fishermen and wholesalers whose assistance in the field was instrumental to this study. We also thank P. Harris for his aging expertise and for being second age reader, and K. Grimball and O. Pashuk for processing and examining reproductive tissues in the laboratory. This is contribution No. 479 from the South Carolina Marine Resources.

LITERATURE CITED

Aguilar-Perera, A. and W. Aguilar-Davila. 1996. A spawning aggregation of Nassau grouper Epinephelus striatus (Pisces: ) in the Mexican Caribbean. Environ. Biol. Fishes 45: 351–361. Bannerot S., W. W. Fox and J. E. Powers. 1987. Reproductive strategies and the management of snappers and groupers in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean. Pages 561–604 in J. J. Polovina and S. Ralston, eds. Tropical snappers and groupers: biology and fisheries management, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado. Coleman, F. C., C. C. Koenig and L. A. Collins. 1996. Reproductive styles of shallow-water grou- pers (Pisces: Serranidae) in the eastern Gulf of Mexico and the consequences of fishing spawn- ing aggregations. Environ. Biol. Fishes 47: 129–141. ______, ______, A. M. Eklund and C. B. Grimes. 1999. Management and conserva- tion of temperate reef fishes in the snapper-grouper complex of the southeastern United States. Pages 233–242 in John A. Musick, ed. Life in the slow lane: ecology and conservation of long- lived marine , AFS Symposium 23. ______, ______, G. R. Huntsman, J. A. Musick, A. M. Eklund, J. C. McGovern, R. W. Chapman, G. R. Sedberry and C. B. Grimes. 2000. Long-lived reef fishes: The snapper- grouper complex. Fisheries. 25(3):14–20. Colin, P. L. 1992. Reproduction of the Nassau grouper, Epinephelus striatus (Pisces: Serranidae) and its relationship to environmental conditions. Environ. Biol. Fishes 34: 357–377. NOTES 239

Domeier, M. L. and P. L. Colin. 1997. Tropical reef fish spawning aggregations: defined and re- viewed. Bull. Mar. Sci. 60: 698–726. Fine, J. C. 1990. Groupers in love: spawning aggregations of Nassau groupers in Honduras. Sea Frontiers 36: 42–45. Fitzhugh, G. R., B. A. Thompson and T. G. Snider III. 1993. Ovarian development, fecundity, and spawning frequency of black drum Pogonias cromis in Louisiana. Fish. Bull., U.S. 91: 244– 253. Harris, P. J. and M. R. Collins. 2000. Age, growth, and age at maturity of gag, Mycteroperca microlepis, from the southeastern United Sates. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66: 105–117. ______, D. M. Wyanski, D. B. White and J. L. Moore. In press. Age, growth, and reproduction of scamp, Mycteroperca phenax, in the southwestern north Atlantic 1979–1997. Bull. Mar. Sci. Heemstra, P. C. and J. E. Randall, eds. 1993. Groupers of the world (Family Serranidae, subfamily Epinephelinae): an annotated and illustrated catalogue of the grouper, rockcod, hind, coral grou- per, and lyretail species known to date. FAO fisheries synopsis no. 125, vol. 16. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Hunter, J. R. and B. J. Macewicz. 1985a. Rates of atresia in the ovary of captive and wild northern anchovy, Engraulis mordax. Fish. Bull., U.S. 83: 119–136. ______and ______. 1985b. Measurement of spawning frequency in multiple spawn- ing fishes batch fecundity in multiple spawning fishes. Pages 79–94 in R. Lasker, ed. An egg production method for estimating spawning biomass of pelagic fish: Application to the north- ern anchovy, Engraulis mordax. NOAA Tech. Rpt. NMFS 36. Huntsman, G. R. and W. E Schaaf. 1994. Simulation of the impact of fishing on reproduction of a protogynous grouper, the graysby. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 14: 41–52. Koenig, C. C, F. C. Coleman, C. B Grimes, G. R. Fitzhugh, K. M. Scanlon, C. T. Gledhill and M. Grace. 2000. Protection of fish spawning habitat for the conservation of warm-temperate reef- fish fisheries of shelf-edge reefs of Florida. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66: 593–616. Luckhurst, B. E. 1996. Report on a program to tag and release tiger groupers, Mycteroperca tigris, (Pisces: Serranidae) captured from a spawning aggregation of this species at Vieques, March 1996. Caribbean Fishery Management Council. San Juan, Puerto Rico, 12 p. Unpubl. ms. Matos, D. and W. Padilla. (in press). Description of the tiger grouper (Mycteroperca tigris) fishery of Vieques , Puerto Rico, during 1995. Proc. Gulf Carib. Fish. Inst. 48: ______and J. Posada. (in press). Current status of the tiger grouper (Mycteroperca tigris) fishery at Vieques Island, Puerto Rico. Proc. Gulf Carib. Fish. Inst. McGovern, J. C., D. M. Wyanski, O. Pashuk, C. S. Manooch, III and G. R. Sedberry. 1998. Changes in the sex ratio and size at maturity of gag, Mycteroperca microlepis, from the Atlantic coast of the southeastern United States during 1976–1995. Fish. Bull., U.S. 96: 797–807. SAS Institute Inc. 1985. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics, ver. 5 Ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina. 956 p. Sadovy, Y. and D.Y. Shapiro, 1987. Criteria for the diagnosis of hermaphroditism in fishes. Copeia 1987: 136–156. ______, M. Figuerola and A. Roman. 1992. Age growth of red hind, Epinephelus guttatus, in Puerto Rico and St. Thomas. Fish. Bull., U.S. 90: 516–528. ______, P. L. Colin and M. L. Domeier. 1994a. Aggregation and spawning in the tiger grouper, Mycteroperca tigris. Copeia 1994: 511–516. ______, A. Rosario and A. Roman. 1994b. Reproduction in an aggregating grouper, the red hind, Epinephelus guttatus. Envir. Biol. Fishes 41:269-286. ______and A. M. Eklund. 1999. Synopsis of biological data on the Nassau grouper Epinephelus striatus (Bloch, 1792), and the jewfish, E. itajara (Lichenstein, 1822). NOAA Tech. Rrt. NMFS 146: 1–65. Sala, E., E. Ballesteros, R. M. Starr. 2001. Rapid decline of Nassau grouper spawning aggregations in Belize: Fishery management and conservation needs. Fisheries 26(10): 23–30. 240 BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, VOL. 70, NO. 1, 2002

Shapiro, D. Y. 1987. Reproduction in groupers. Pages 295–327 in J. J. Polovina and S. Ralston, eds.Tropical snappers and groupers: biology and fisheries management, Westview Press, Boul- der, Colorado. Smith, C. L. 1958. The groupers of Bermuda. In J. L. Bardach, C. L. Smith and D. W. Menzel, Bermuda Fish. Res. Prog. Final Rpt., Bermuda Trade Development Board, Hamilton Bermuda. 59 p. ______. 1959. Hermaphroditism in some serranid fishes from Bermuda. Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci. Arts and Lett. 44: 111–118. ______. 1971. Family: Serranidae. In W. Fischer, ed. FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes, western central Atlantic, Fishing Area 31. Vols. IV and V. Food and Agricul- ture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

DATE SUBMITTED: May 4, 2001. DATE ACCEPTED: November 26, 2001.

ADDRESSES: (D.B.W., D.M.W., B.M.E.) South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Marine Resources Research Institute, P.O. Box 12559, Charleston, South Carolina 29422. (C.G.L.) Depart- ment of Natural and Environmental Resources, P.O. Box 9066600, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00906- 6600. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: (D.B.W.) E-mail: .