DOCSLIB.ORG

Temecula Valley Basin Salt and Nutrient Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Temecula Valley Basin Salt and Nutrient Management Plan Temecula Valley Basin Salt and Nutrient Management Plan Prepared by: In Association with: GEOSCIENCE Support Services, Inc. Michael Welch REVE Environmental, Inc. March 2014 Temecula Valley Basin Salt and Nutrient Management Plan Acknowledgements The development of the Temecula Valley Basin Salt and Nutrient Management Plan was possible only through the contributions of a large group of stakeholders and technical experts. The following are recognized for their efforts towards the development of this document: Warren Back, Rancho California Water District Charles Binder, Santa Margarita River Watershed Watermaster Jim Blanke, RMC Water and Environment Leasa Cleland, Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Jayne Joy, Eastern Municipal Water District Scott Goldman, RMC Water and Environment Denise Landstedt, Rancho California Water District Scott Lynch, RMC Water and Environment Khalique Khan, United States Marine Corps – Camp Pendleton Base Brenda Meyer, Western Municipal Water District John Odermatt, San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Fisayo Osibodu, San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Jason Uhley, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Michael Welch, Consulting Engineer Dennis Williams, GEOSCIENCE Support Services, Inc. Richard Williamson, Rancho California Water District Anders Wistrom, REVE Environmental, Inc. Johnson Yeh, GEOSCIENCE Support Services, Inc. Thank you for your contribution of time, data, and expertise. Funding for the preparation of this document has been provided by the following: A California Department of Water Resources Integrated Regional Water Management Planning Grant Rancho California Water District Eastern Municipal Water District March 2014 i Temecula Valley Basin Salt and Nutrient Management Plan March 2014 ii Temecula Valley Basin Salt and Nutrient Management Plan March 2014 iii Temecula Valley Basin Salt and Nutrient Management Plan March 2014 iv Temecula Valley Basin Salt and Nutrient Management Plan Table of Contents List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................... ix Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 Chapter 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose Statement ................................................................................................1-4 1.2 Study Area.............................................................................................................1-4 1.3 Regulatory Background .........................................................................................1-5 1.4 Stakeholder Process ........................................................................................... 1-11 1.5 Water Needs ....................................................................................................... 1-17 1.6 Groundwater Management within the Basin ........................................................ 1-18 Chapter 2 Basin Characterization and Groundwater Quality .............................................2-1 2.1 Basin Description ...................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Existing Groundwater Quality for Salt and Nutrient Analysis ..................................2-9 2.3 Historical Groundwater Quality Trends ................................................................ 2-15 2.4 Variability of Groundwater Levels and Quality with Depth .................................... 2-22 Chapter 3 Source and Loading Analysis .............................................................................3-1 3.1 Methodology ..........................................................................................................3-1 3.2 Loading Analysis Summary ................................................................................. 3-11 Chapter 4 Goals and Water Management Strategies ..........................................................4-1 4.1 Goals .....................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 Water Management Strategies ..............................................................................4-3 Chapter 5 Groundwater Quality Trend Analysis .................................................................5-1 5.1 Approach ...............................................................................................................5-1 5.2 Existing Water Quality ...........................................................................................5-8 5.3 Projected Groundwater Quality Trends ..................................................................5-9 5.4 Summary of Projected Changes in Water Quality ................................................ 5-20 Chapter 6 Implementation Plan ...........................................................................................6-1 6.1 Monitoring and Evaluation .....................................................................................6-1 6.2 Prevention .............................................................................................................6-2 6.3 Planning ................................................................................................................6-2 6.4 Salt and Nutrient Program Management ................................................................6-3 6.5 Schedule of Activities ............................................................................................6-3 6.6 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Compliance .....................................6-4 Chapter 7 Conclusions .........................................................................................................7-1 Chapter 8 References ...........................................................................................................8-1 March 2014 v Temecula Valley Basin Salt and Nutrient Management Plan List of Tables Table ES-1 Groundwater Basin Plan Objectives for Areas within the Temecula Valley Basin .... v Table ES-2 Initial Stakeholder Groups Established .................................................................... v Table ES-3 Goals for Recycled Water Use within the Study Area, by 2035 (AFY) .................... vi Table ES-4 Long-Term TDS Concentrations from Groundwater Quality Trend Analysis, Pauba Aquifer .............................................................................................................................. viii Table ES-5 Long-Term Nitrate (as NO3) Concentrations from Groundwater Quality Trend Analysis, Pauba Aquifer ..................................................................................................... ix Table ES-6 Long-Term TDS Concentrations from Groundwater Quality Trend Analysis, Temecula Aquifer ............................................................................................................... ix Table ES-7 Long-Term Nitrate (as NO3) Concentrations from Groundwater Quality Trend Analysis, Temecula Aquifer ................................................................................................. x Table ES-8 Recommended Implementation Actions ............................................................... xiii Table 1-1 Groundwater Basin Plan Objectives for Areas within the Temecula Valley Basin . 1-11 Table 1-2 Initial Stakeholder Groups Established ................................................................. 1-12 Table 1-3 Stakeholder Meeting Participants ......................................................................... 1-14 Table 2-4 Basinwide Average Annual Groundwater Budget, Simulated Existing Conditions .. 2-6 Table 2-5 Averaged Concentrations within Each Hydrologic Subarea, 2008-2012, Temecula Aquifer ........................................................................................................................... 2-15 Table 3-6 Water Quality Parameters for Loading Model Potable Water Sources .................... 3-6 Table 3-7 Landscape and Agriculture Loading Inputs ............................................................. 3-8 Table 3-8 Water Quality Parameters for Loading Model Recycled Water Sources ................. 3-8 Table 3-9 Water Quality Parameters for Septic Systems ........................................................ 3-9 Table 3-10 Average Annual Mass Loading of TDS, Existing Land and Water Use Conditions ...................................................................................................................................... 3-12 Table 3-11 Average Annual Nitrate (as NO3) Loading, Existing Land and Water Use Conditions ...................................................................................................................................... 3-13 Table 4-12 Goals for Recycled Water Use within the Study Area, by 2035 (AFY) .................. 4-3 Table 5-13 Projected Change in Land Use Classification, Existing Conditions to Future Conditions ....................................................................................................................... 5-5 Table 5-14 Projected Change in Septic Systems, Existing Conditions to Future Conditions ... 5-6 Table 5-15 Probable Range of Average Concentrations within Each Hydrologic Subarea, 2008- 2012 ...............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Palm Springs
    2020 PROVIDER AND PHARMACY DIRECTORY Riverside County Golden State Medicare Health Plan HMO Plan Provider Directory This directory is current as of 1/16/2020. This directory provides a list of Golden State Medicare Health Plan’s current network providers. This directory is for Riverside County. To access Golden State Medicare Health Plan’s online provider directory, you can visit www.GSMHP.com. For any questions about the information contained in this directory, please call our Member Service Department at 877-541-4111, 8am to 8pm Monday through Friday TTY/TDD users should call 711. Golden State Medicare Health Plan is an HMO with a Medicare contract. Enrollment in Golden State Medicare Health Plan depends on contract renewal. The Provider and Pharmacy Network may change at any time. You will receive notice when necessary. This document may be available in an alternate format such as Braille, large print, or audio. We strongly suggest that you review our current Provider/Pharmacy Directory to see if your pharmacy is still in our network. 1 2020 PROVIDER AND PHARMACY DIRECTORY - Riverside County Table of Contents 131 – Introduction...................................................................................................................5 What is the service area for Golden State Medicare Health Plan?.......................................................... 7 How do you find Golden State Medicare Health Plan providers in your area?.................................. 8 131 – List of Network Providers..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Empire Fact Sheet SIMPLIFYING FEDERAL STUDENT AID: Grants, Loans, & Repayment Plans
    Inland Empire Fact Sheet SIMPLIFYING FEDERAL STUDENT AID: Grants, Loans, & Repayment Plans November 2016 Join the conversation at #KeepCollegeAff ordable INTRODUCTION The need for a college education has never been greater. Degrees at all levels, from vocational certificates to Master’s degrees, allow individuals to enjoy greater economic and social success. In fact, individuals with a bachelor’s degree will earn over $1.3 million more over their lifetimes than someone with only a high school diploma. For first-generation, low income and minority students, access to college opportunity yields a pathway to increased economic stability and prosperity for future generations. The jobs of the future require college credentials. By 2020, 65% of all jobs across the United States will require some type of college credential. The same holds true for the State of California: 68% of all jobs by 2020 will require future workers to have college credentials. Educational credentials needed For jobs of the future 12% 11% Master's Degree or Higher 24% 23% Bachelor's Degree Some College, Associate's, 32% 33% or Vocational Credential High School Diploma or Less 33% 34% College Credential Required California U.S. Unless immediate action is taken, and current trends persist, California will be short 2.4 million college educated workers to meet workforce demands. To succeed in this new economy, California must ensure that more of its residents are on track to enter college and graduate with a degree or credential. Keeping college affordable is key to meeting California’s economic demands and ensuring opportunity to a better future for the state’s residents.
    [Show full text]
  • 1917 Gossip Column & News Articles
    TEMECULA VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY 1917 Gossip Column & News Articles January 5, 1917 After spending a few days in Los Angeles, Paul Clark of the Pauba Ranch returned home the first of the week. Eila Kolb, who is attending the Riverside business college, spent the holidays at home. After spending a very pleasant visit with his parents Frank Ramos returned to Riverside last Saturday to continue his studies. Dr. L. L. Roripaugh of Auld was in town the other day treating his friends to cigars. The doctor being newly wed his many friends wish him and his bride a very happy future. Curtis Stevenson and wife of Pechanga were first of the week visitors at the Ventura Arviso home. Francis McCarrell drove over here after freight for the Aguanga store. E. C. Tripp of Aguanga was in town the last of the week hauling lumber. Mrs. John B. Kelly returned home Saturday from Los Angeles where she had a pleasant two weeks' visit with her sister, Mrs. John N. Carr. Charles Swain and Juan Munoa have moved to the Harvey place, where they will plant barley this winter. The dance given at the Bank hall Saturday night was attended by several from the surrounding country. D. S. Woosley of Escondido was in town the first of the week doing some missionary work. A large number of the young people from town attended the dance at the Murrieta Hot Springs. George Studley has succeeded J. S. Felix as foreman of the cowboys at the Pauba Ranch. Mr. Studley has been a steady hand at the ranch for four years.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Economic Profile Temecula
    COMMUNITY ECONOMIC PROFILE for TEMECULA RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared in conjunction with the City of Temecula and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Incorporated December 1, 1989, Temecula is located 85 miles southeast of Los Angeles, 487 miles south Location of San Francisco and 55 miles north of San Diego. 1980 1990 2000 2010 Economic Growth Population-County 633,166 1,170,413 1,545,387 2,189,6411 Taxable Sales-County $3,274,017 $9,522,631 $16,979,449 $22,227,8772 and Trends Population-City 8,324 27,09957,716 100,0971 Taxable Sales-City N/A $119,900 $1,411,051 $2,055,8472 Housing Units-City N/A 9,130 18,293 31,7811 Median Household Income-City N/A $44,270 $59,516 $77,8503 School Enrollment K-12 N/A 7,595 17,449 30,1834 1. U.S. Census Bureau, 2010. Housing count refl ects occupied dwellings. 2. California State Board of Equalization, calendar year 2009. Add 000. 3. U.S. Census Bureau, 2006-2010 American Community Survey. 4. California Department of Education, 2010. Enrollment count is for 2009-10. AVERAGE TEMPERATURE RAIN HUMIDITY Climate Period Min. Mean Max. Inches 4 a.m. Noon 4 p.m. January 46.0 61.0 69.9 1.35 55 40 55 April 51.7 62.0 72.2 0.75 60 30 50 July 62.5 73.4 84.2 0.05 45 40 35 October 52.4 64.3 76.2 0.46 50 30 40 Year 57.2 64.7 73.4 10.44 52 40 45 Transportation RAIL: None.
    [Show full text]
  • General Plan Amendment No. 1208 Lakeland Village Community Plan
    FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION General Plan Amendment No. 1208 Lakeland Village Community Plan State Clearinghouse No. 2020050501 Lead Agency: RIVERSIDE COUNTY Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 Contact: Mr. Robert Flores 951.955.1195 Prepared by: MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 3536 Concours Street Ontario, California 91764 Contact: Mr. Peter Minegar, CEP-IT 951.506.3523 June 2020 JN 155334 This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources. Section I Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration General Plan Amendment No. 1208 Lakeland Village Community Plan COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM: INITIAL STUDY Environmental Assessment (CEQ / EA) Number: N/A Project Case Type (s) and Number(s): General Plan Amendment No. 1208 (GPA No. 1208) Lead Agency Name: Riverside County Planning Department Address: 4080 Lemon Street, P.O. Box 1409, Riverside, CA 92502-1409 Contact Person: Robert Flores (Urban and Regional Planner IV) Telephone Number: 951-955-1195 Applicant’s Name: N/A Applicant’s Address: N/A I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project Description: BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT The County of Riverside is composed of approximately 7,300 square miles, bounded by Orange County to the west, San Bernardino County to the north, the State of Arizona to the east, and San Diego and Imperial Counties to the south. Development for the unincorporated County is guided by the Riverside County General Plan, which was last comprehensively updated and adopted in December 2015. The Riverside County General Plan is divided into 19 Area Plans covering most of the County (refer to Exhibit 1, Riverside County Area Plans).
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2019-2020 and FY 2020-21 Budget
    BUDGET Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District FISCAL YEAR 2020 AND 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL MANAGER BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS 4 GFOA Distinguished Budget Presentation Award 15 CSMFO Certificate of Award for Excellence in Operating Budget 16 BUDGET NARRATIVE 17 Description of the District and the Budget Process 18 Operating Revenues and Expenditures 24 Non-Operating Revenues and Expenditures 29 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS 36 Organization Chart 37 Summary of Changes in Authorized Positions 38 Authorized Position Listing 41 STRATEGIC PLAN & DEPARTMENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS 46 Strategic Plan 47 General Management 49 Business Services Division 53 Engineering & Operations Division 58 CAPITAL OUTLAYS 63 Significant Capital Outlays 64 Fiscal Year 2020 65 Fiscal Year 2021 66 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 67 Capital Improvement Projects 68 Fiscal Year 2020 & 2021 76 BUDGET STATEMENTS 79 Fund Structure 80 List of Funds/Programs 82 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Relationship between Divisions, Departments, Sections, and Funds 87 Summary of Revenues & Operating Transfers In/Out All Funds 88 Consolidated Statement of Sources and Uses 89 Statement of Sources and Uses of Funds Fiscal Year 2020 90 Statement of Sources and Uses of Funds Fiscal Year 2021 106 Consolidated Statement of Income 122 Computation of Debt Coverage 123 Debt Repayment Requirements & Sources Fiscal Year 2020 & 2021 124 Funding and Cash Flow Diagram 127 Significant Changes in Fund Balances 128 Schedule of Changes in Fund Balance, Fiscal Year 2020 129 Schedule of Changes
    [Show full text]
  • Notice Concerning Copyright Restrictions
    NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS This document may contain copyrighted materials. These materials have been made available for use in research, teaching, and private study, but may not be used for any commercial purpose. Users may not otherwise copy, reproduce, retransmit, distribute, publish, commercially exploit or otherwise transfer any material. The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be "used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research." If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. Geothermal Resources Council, TRANSACTIONS, Vol. 10, September 1986 GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION IN THE VICINITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Brian N. Damiata and Tien-Chang Lee Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 ABSTRACT Geothermal exploration in the Lake Elsinore area has primarily focused near a cross fault which acts as a conduit for thermal water. Flow testing of an exploratory hole indicates an ani- sotropic aquifer with a maximum transmissivity IO mi axis oriented along the fault striking N 11" E. Thermal water migrates laterally throughout the downtown area along a zone of enhanced transmissivity associated with the fault.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Ballot
    County of Riverside Consolidated General Election Registrar of Voters Tuesday, November 3, 2020 County Voter Information Guide Voter Assistance Centers October 31-November 2 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. IMPORTANT! VOTING HAS CHANGED! DETAILS INSIDE Election Day, November 3 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Suggested Location on Back Cover Registration Deadline October 19, 2020 Quick • Easy • Convenient This election every voter receives a Vote-By-Mail ballot. Additional Information Inside Request Language Assistance Form on Back Cover to receive election material translated in available selected languages. AVISO IMPORTANTE Una traducción en Español de esta Guía de Información del Condado Para el Votante puede obtenerse en la oficina del Registro de Votantes llamando al (951) 486- 7200 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS o (800) 773-VOTE (8683) o visite nuestro 2720 Gateway Drive, Riverside, CA 92507-0918 • (951) 486-7200 • (800) 773-VOTE (8683) • TTY (951) 697-8966 Mailing Address: 2724 Gateway Drive, Riverside, CA 92507-0918 sitio web www.voteinfo.net www.voteinfo.net THIS ELECTION VOTING IS DIFFERENT VOTE-BY-MAIL Vote at home using your Vote-By-Mail ballot No Postage Required Quick, easy, convenient... from the comfort of your home! OR BALLOT DROP-OFF LOCATION Drop off your ballot at any of the Ballot Drop-off locations in Riverside County No Postage Required See inside... for a list of drop-off locations throughout Riverside County! OR VOTER ASSISTANCE CENTER Vote in-person at any of the Voter Assistance Centers in Riverside County October 31-November 2, from 9:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Local Knowledge Graph Construction to Scale Seq2seq Models to Multi-Document Inputs
    Using Local Knowledge Graph Construction to Scale Seq2Seq Models to Multi-Document Inputs Angela Fan Claire Gardent Chloe´ Braud Antoine Bordes FAIR / LORIA CNRS / LORIA CNRS / LORIA FAIR angelafan,[email protected] claire.gardent,[email protected] Abstract Query-based open-domain NLP tasks require information synthesis from long and diverse web results. Current approaches extrac- tively select portions of web text as input to Sequence-to-Sequence models using meth- ods such as TF-IDF ranking. We propose constructing a local graph structured knowl- edge base for each query, which compresses the web search information and reduces re- dundancy. We show that by linearizing the graph into a structured input sequence, models can encode the graph representations within a standard Sequence-to-Sequence setting. For two generative tasks with very long text in- put, long-form question answering and multi- document summarization, feeding graph rep- resentations as input can achieve better perfor- mance than using retrieved text portions. 1 Introduction Effective information synthesis is at the core of many Natural Language Processing applica- Figure 1: Multi-Document Input to Linearized Graph tions, such as open-domain question answering Multi-document input resulting from web search queries are converted to a graph structured knowledge base using coref- and multi-document summarization. In such tasks, erence resolution and information extraction, then linearized a fundamental challenge is the ability to distill rel- into a sequence for Seq2Seq models. Color indicates coref- evant knowledge from hundreds of thousands of erence resolution. Node weight is indicated by circle radius and edge weight by line thickness.
    [Show full text]
  • The San Jacinto Watershed Component of the Santa Ana Integrated Watershed Plan
    The San Jacinto Watershed Component of the Santa Ana Integrated Watershed Plan IRWM Plan Proposal for Integrated Regional Water Management Prop 50, Chapter 8 Planning Grant Application May 11, 2005 Submitted by: San Jacinto River Watershed Council Table of Contents ACRONYMS 5 A. BACKGROUND 7 Chapter 1 Executive Summary - Proposal Introduction and Objectives 7 Section 1 - Summary of Proposed Planning Grant Proposal 7 Section 2 - Why a Focused Component Plan? 9 Section 3 - Why Support This Proposal? 9 Chapter 2 - Regional Agency or Regional Water Management Group Description 11 Section 1 - Lead Agency 11 Section 2 - Funding Partners 11 Section 3 - Other Interested and Supporting Stakeholders 11 Section 4 - Plan for Adopting a Final Plan 12 Section 5 - Entities to Adopt Final Plan 12 Chapter 3 – Watershed Background 14 Section 1 - Overview of Project and Watershed Area 14 Section 2 - Physiographic Characteristics 16 Section 3 - Major Watershed Features 17 Gavilan Hills 19 Steele Peak 19 Motte-Rimrock Reserve 19 Section 4 - Internal Boundaries within the Region 21 Section 5 - Major Flood Control Infrastructure 21 Section 6 - Major Land Use Divisions 24 Section 7 - Description of Water Resources 26 Section 8 – Hydrometeorological Characteristics 29 Section 9 - Surface Water Quality 31 Section 10 - Water Supplies – Quantity and Quality 36 Section 11 - Areas of Special Biological Significance and other Sensitive Habitat 41 Section 12 - Values, Social and Cultural Makeup and Trends of the Regional Community 44 Section 13 - Economic Conditions
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study from the Temecula Area, Southwestern Riverside County, California
    Land Subsidence (Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Land Subsidence, May 1991). IAHS Publ. no. 200,1991. Earth Fissures, Urbanization and Litigation: A Case Study from the Temecula Area, Southwestern Riverside County, California E. J. CORWIN, S. C. ALHADEFF, S. P. OGGEL Lorenz Alhadeff Lundin & Oggel, 101 West Broadway, Suite 1500, San Diego, CA 92101, USA R. J. SHLEMON P.O. Box 3066, Newport Beach, CA 92659 , USA ABSTRACT Ground fissures occurring in 1987 extended discontinuously along a 12-km long zone in the rapidly-urbanizing Temecula-Wolf Valley area of southwestern Riverside County, California. Impacted were new residential and industrial buildings. Litigation has ensued, and damage is now alleged to exceed about 50 million dollars. Defendants include County government, a local Water District, developers, and consulting engineers and geologists. INTRODUCTION In the mid-1980s, urbanization dramatically increased in the Temecula area of southwestern Riverside County, California. From a population of 8,324 in 1980, the previously serene town, about 41 km north of San Diego and 53 km southeast of Los Angeles, jumped to a population of over 29,000 in 1988 (Fig. 1). Developers seized on the increasing popularity of southern California as a desirable place to live, and vast new residential and light industrial complexes ("Business Parks") were built. The rapid urbanization produced the usual plethora of environmental constraints for both the developers and residents of Temecula. The most unexpected problem was the mid-1987 occurrence of earth fissures, the resulting allegations of property damage and general loss of value, and the perhaps inevitable litigation that has since followed.
    [Show full text]
  • COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT for Communications Support and Strategy Services
    Submission of Proposal COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT For Communications Support and Strategy services Submitted Friday, January 17, 2020, by: Erin Gilhuly Founder & President, CV Strategies [email protected] | ph: 760.641.0739 Palm Desert | Los Angeles | Sacramento cvstrategies.com | [email protected] | 760.776.1766 LOS ANGELES | PalM DESERT | SACRAMENTO January 17, 2020 Nabila Guzman Management Analyst I Costa Mesa Sanitary District 290 Paularino Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Dear Ms. Guzman, It is our privilege to present the attached proposal to the Costa Mesa Sanitary District regarding Communications Support and Strategy. This proposal is valid for 60 days from the due date of January 17, 2020. We understand the District is looking to retain a consulting firm and professional partner to provide support for strategic communications and outreach. CV Strategies has a long and successful history of helping special districts such as yours increase public engagement and build awareness of programs and services. CV Strategies is a comprehensive communications and public engagement firm with expertise in the water and wastewater industry. We are currently involved in active communications initiatives with more than 70 public agencies throughout California, providing a range of services that include content development, website design, social media, crisis communications, training, media relations, translation, strategic guidance, campaign planning, and graphic design. The main contact for this project is our Vice President, Tara Bravo, who can be reached directly at [email protected] or 510-300-5843. The CV Strategies team is available and standing by to begin work on this project. We look forward to collaborating with you and helping you realize your communication goals.
    [Show full text]