DOCSLIB.ORG

The San Jacinto Watershed Component of the Santa Ana Integrated Watershed Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The San Jacinto Watershed Component of the Santa Ana Integrated Watershed Plan The San Jacinto Watershed Component of the Santa Ana Integrated Watershed Plan IRWM Plan Proposal for Integrated Regional Water Management Prop 50, Chapter 8 Planning Grant Application May 11, 2005 Submitted by: San Jacinto River Watershed Council Table of Contents ACRONYMS 5 A. BACKGROUND 7 Chapter 1 Executive Summary - Proposal Introduction and Objectives 7 Section 1 - Summary of Proposed Planning Grant Proposal 7 Section 2 - Why a Focused Component Plan? 9 Section 3 - Why Support This Proposal? 9 Chapter 2 - Regional Agency or Regional Water Management Group Description 11 Section 1 - Lead Agency 11 Section 2 - Funding Partners 11 Section 3 - Other Interested and Supporting Stakeholders 11 Section 4 - Plan for Adopting a Final Plan 12 Section 5 - Entities to Adopt Final Plan 12 Chapter 3 – Watershed Background 14 Section 1 - Overview of Project and Watershed Area 14 Section 2 - Physiographic Characteristics 16 Section 3 - Major Watershed Features 17 Gavilan Hills 19 Steele Peak 19 Motte-Rimrock Reserve 19 Section 4 - Internal Boundaries within the Region 21 Section 5 - Major Flood Control Infrastructure 21 Section 6 - Major Land Use Divisions 24 Section 7 - Description of Water Resources 26 Section 8 – Hydrometeorological Characteristics 29 Section 9 - Surface Water Quality 31 Section 10 - Water Supplies – Quantity and Quality 36 Section 11 - Areas of Special Biological Significance and other Sensitive Habitat 41 Section 12 - Values, Social and Cultural Makeup and Trends of the Regional Community 44 Section 13 - Economic Conditions and Disadvantaged Community Status 46 Section 14 - Trends 49 Section 15 - Benefits of Planning for this Region 49 Chapter 4 – Planning Objectives and Major Water Related Issues and Conflicts 51 Section 1 – Planning Objectives 51 Section 2 - Major Water Related Issues and Conflicts 51 Chapter 5 - Integration of Water Management Strategies 55 Section 1 - Water Management Strategies 55 Section 2 - Strategies to be Considered 55 Section 3 - How Strategies were Determined 57 Chapter 6 - Implementation 58 Section 1 –General San Jacinto Component Plan Implementation Scheduling 58 Section 2 – Specific Drivers for SJ Component Plan Implementation 58 Section 3 – Institutional Structure to ensure SJ Component Plan implementation 58 Section 4 – Adaptive Management of the San Jacinto Component Plan 59 Section 5 - NPS Pollution Control Activities 59 2 Program Goals: 60 Chapter 7 - Impacts and Benefits 61 Section 1 - Potential Impacts and Benefits of Plan Development and Implementation 61 Section 2- Description of Potential Impacts 61 Section 3 - CEQA Compliance 62 Chapter 8 - Data and Technical Analysis 63 Section 1 - Plan Development Support Data 63 Chapter 9 - Data Management 66 Section 1- Dissemination of Data 66 Section 2 - Support of Statewide Data Needs 66 Support of SWRCB Statewide Data Management Efforts 66 Chapter 10 - Stakeholder Involvement 67 Section 1- Incorporation of Stakeholder Involvement 67 Section 2 - Outreach 68 Section 3 - Proposed Stakeholders 68 Chapter 11 -Disadvantaged Communities 74 Section 1 - Extent of Disadvantaged Communities 74 Section 2 – Water Supply and Water Quality needs of Disadvantaged Communities 74 Section 3 - Benefits to Disadvantaged Communities 74 Section 4 - Involvement in Planning Process 74 Chapter 12 - Relation to Local Planning 74 Section 1 – Overview and Relation to local planning documents 74 Section 2 – Dynamics between local planning and San Jacinto Component Plan planning processes. 75 Chapter 13 - Agency Coordination 75 Section 1 - Coordination and Cooperation with Relevant Local, State and Federal Regulatory Agencies 75 Section 2 - Coordination with Local Land-Use Planning Decision-Makers 76 B - WORKPLAN 77 Task 1: Project Initiation (January 2006 through March 2006) 77 Task 2:Stakeholder Meetings & SJ Component IRWM Scope Refinement (February 2006-April 2006) 78 Task 3:Watershed Data Inventory (January 2006-April 2006) 79 Task 4: Specific Watershed Analyses (April 2006- July 2007) 80 Task 5: Development of General Watershed Strategies and Programs (April 2006 – July 2007) 83 Task 6: Draft Component Watershed Management Plan Development (January 2007 – September 2007) 84 Task 7: Finalization and Implementation/Adoption of Plan (September 2007- January 2008) 85 Task 8: Interim and Final Progress Reports (January 2006 – January 2008) 85 Task 9: Project Administration (January 2006-January 2008) 85 3 C. BUDGET 87 Funding Match Detail: 88 D. SCHEDULE 90 E. EXISTING SJRWC WATERSHED PLAN OUTLINE 91 Figures FIGURE 1 – LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANNING PROJECTS WITHIN THE SAN JACINTO WATERSHED 8 FIGURE 2 - SAN JACINTO RIVER WATERSHED BOUNDARY 15 FIGURE 3 – RIVERSIDE COUNTY INTEGRATED PLAN PLANNING AREAS 18 FIGURE 4 – CITIES AND MAJOR COMMUNITIES WITHIN THE SAN JACINTO WATERSHED. 22 FIGURE 5 – WATER AGENCIES AND WASTEWATER AGENCIES WITHIN THE SAN JACINTO WATERSHED (BLUE BOUNDARY) 23 FIGURE 6 - LAND USE IN THE SAN JACINTO WATERSHED (SJNMP, TETRATECH, 2004) 25 FIGURE 7 - MAJOR WATER RESOURCES FEATURES IN THE WATERSHED. (SJNMP, TETRATECH, APRIL 2004) 27 FIGURE 8 – SAN JACINTO WATERSHED AVERAGE RAINFALL AND EVAPORATIVE LOSS 30 FIGURE 9 – GROUNDWATER BASINS IN THE SAN JACINTO WATERSHED (BLUE BOUNDARY) 37 FIGURE 10 – LAND USES IN THE SAN JACINTO WATERSHED 47 Tables TABLE 1 – LAND USE WITHIN THE SAN JACINTO WATERSHED (SJNMP, TETRATECH, 2004) 26 TABLE 2 – BENEFICIAL USES FOR LAKES AND RESERVOIRS IN THE SAN JACINTO RIVER WATERSHED 32 TABLE 3 – BENEFICIAL USES OF INLAND SURFACE STREAMS IN THE SAN JACINTO 33 TABLE 4 – CANYON LAKE AND LAKE ELSINORE TMDL TARGETS AND ACTUAL 34 CONCENTRATIONS 34 TABLE 5 – TMDL HYDROLOGIC CONDITION EXAMPLES 35 TABLE 6 – SAN JACINTO WATERSHED GROUNDWATER BASIN BENEFICIAL USES 38 TABLE 7 - DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITIES WITH THE SAN JACINTO WATERSHED 48 4 ACRONYMS AF acre-feet BMPs best management practices CAFO Confined Animal Feeding Operation CDFG Department of Fish and Game CDP Census Designated Places CETAP Community and Environmental Transportation Accessibility Process CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CL Canyon Lake CWA Clean Water Act DWR Department of Water Resources EMWD Eastern Municipal Water District EVMWD Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District GIS Geographic Information System HCP Habitat Conservation Plan IRWM Integrated Regional Watershed Management Plan IWP SAWPA’s Integrated Watershed Plan LE Lake Elsinore LESJWA Lake Elsinore San Jacinto Watershed Authority MSHCP Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System MWD Metropolitan Water District NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NMP Nutrient Management Plan NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPS Non-point source RCD Resource Conservation District RCFC&WCD Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SAMP Special Area Management Plan for the Santa Margarita and San Jacinto Watersheds SARWQCB Santa Ana Region Regional Water Quality Control Board SAWA Santa Ana Watershed Association of RCDs SAWPA Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority SJBRCD San Jacinto Basin RCD SJNMP San Jacinto Nutrient Management Plan SJPMP San Jacinto Pathogen Management Plan SJRWC San Jacinto River Watershed Council SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board TMDL Total Maximum Daily Loads TN total nitrogen TP total phosphorous TDS total dissolved solids UCR University of California, Riverside USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers 5 USBR United States Bureau of Reclamation USDA United States Department of Agriculture USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service WMI California State University, San Bernardino Water Management Institute WRCAC Western Riverside County Agriculture Coalition WMWD Western Municipal Water District WY water years 6 San Jacinto Component Plan of the Santa Ana Integrated Watershed Plan Planning Grant Proposal Authorized Under Proposition 50 Chapter 8 A. BACKGROUND Chapter 1 Executive Summary - Proposal Introduction and Objectives Section 1 - Summary of Proposed Planning Grant Proposal This grant proposal requests $500,000 to develop a focused component of the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority’s (SAWPA) Santa Ana Integrated Watershed Plan (SAWPA IWP) specific to the 732 square mile San Jacinto Watershed. The focused component will build on the significant work done by the broader SAWPA IWP with regards to groundwater, surface water, reclaimed water and desalter water management. Specifically, this proposal would initiate a number of specific studies to develop implementation plans for: • Watershed and Waterbody water quality data collection • Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake Nutrient and Canyon Lake Pathogen TMDLs • San Jacinto River Reach 4 Gap Analysis to address competing water quality, agriculture, water supply, habitat and flood control needs within this upper watershed area. • Septic System Management Plan In addition, the proposal includes funds to support: • Stakeholder involvement to identify (and fund) additional planning studies likely to focus on: o groundwater and/or reclaimed water management in order to reduce reliance on imported water supplies and to address a potential water supply deficiency during drought conditions in 2025 o Development of a integrated public education program focusing on watershed protection and management. Components for disadvantaged communities will specifically be considered. o Analysis of a complex flood management, critical habitat conservation, wetlands enhancement
Load more

Recommended publications
  • County of Riverside General Plan San Jacinto Valley Area Plan
    County of Riverside General Plan San Jacinto Valley Area Plan COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Transportation and Land Management Agency 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside, CA 92501-3634 Phone: (951) 955-3200, Fax: (951) 955-1811 October 2011 Page i County of Riverside General Plan San Jacinto Valley Area Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Vision Summary.......................................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 A Special Note on Implementing the Vision ........................................................................................................ 2 Location ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Features ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Setting ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Unique Features ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 San Jacinto River ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3.8 Biological Resources
    Section 3.8 – Biological Resources 3.8 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.8.1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this section is to identify existing biological resources within the planning area covered by the proposed project, analyze potential biological impacts, and recommend mitigation measures to avoid or lessen the significance of any identified adverse impacts. The assessment of impacts to biological resources is a qualitative review of the existing biological resources within the City and its SOI and a determination of whether the proposed project includes adequate provisions to ensure the protection of these resources. Given the programmatic nature of the PEIR, specific impacts to individual properties or areas are not identified or known at this time. 3.8.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The information contained in this Environmental Setting section is primarily from information contained in the City of Lake Elsinore General Plan Background Reports (see Chapter 3 – Biological Resources). This document is attached as Appendix B to this PEIR. The City and SOI are located in the Elsinore Valley, which is generally bounded on the west by the east flank of the rugged Santa Ana Mountains and on the west by gently sloping hills. The San Jacinto River and Temescal Wash cut through the valley, converging at Lake Elsinore. The area contains a mixture of land developed for residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, and agricultural uses and undeveloped land remaining in its natural state. Approximately 16 natural vegetative communities, in addition to developed sites and agricultural uses, occur in the City and its SOI. Each of these habitats provides cover, food, and water necessary to meet biological requirements of a variety of animal species.
    [Show full text]
  • 1917 Gossip Column & News Articles
    TEMECULA VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY 1917 Gossip Column & News Articles January 5, 1917 After spending a few days in Los Angeles, Paul Clark of the Pauba Ranch returned home the first of the week. Eila Kolb, who is attending the Riverside business college, spent the holidays at home. After spending a very pleasant visit with his parents Frank Ramos returned to Riverside last Saturday to continue his studies. Dr. L. L. Roripaugh of Auld was in town the other day treating his friends to cigars. The doctor being newly wed his many friends wish him and his bride a very happy future. Curtis Stevenson and wife of Pechanga were first of the week visitors at the Ventura Arviso home. Francis McCarrell drove over here after freight for the Aguanga store. E. C. Tripp of Aguanga was in town the last of the week hauling lumber. Mrs. John B. Kelly returned home Saturday from Los Angeles where she had a pleasant two weeks' visit with her sister, Mrs. John N. Carr. Charles Swain and Juan Munoa have moved to the Harvey place, where they will plant barley this winter. The dance given at the Bank hall Saturday night was attended by several from the surrounding country. D. S. Woosley of Escondido was in town the first of the week doing some missionary work. A large number of the young people from town attended the dance at the Murrieta Hot Springs. George Studley has succeeded J. S. Felix as foreman of the cowboys at the Pauba Ranch. Mr. Studley has been a steady hand at the ranch for four years.
    [Show full text]
  • County of Riverside General Plan Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan
    County of Riverside General Plan Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Transportation and Land Management Agency 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Riverside, CA 92501-3634 Phone: (951) 955-3200, Fax: (951) 955-1811 October 2011 County of Riverside General Plan Reche Canyon/Badlands Area Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS Vision Summary.......................................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 A Special Note on Implementing the Vision ........................................................................................................ 2 Location ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Features ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Setting ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Unique Features ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Badlands/Norton Younglove Preserve
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the San Jacinto Valley Important Bird Area the San Jacinto Valley
    Birds of the San Jacinto Valley Important Bird Area The San Jacinto Valley “Through this beautiful valley runs a good-sized river...on whose banks are large, shady groves... All its plain is full of fl owers, fertile pastures, and other vegetation.” So wrote Juan Bautista De Anza in 1774, describing the San Jacinto Valley as he came down from the mountains on his expedition from Tubac, Arizona, to San Francisco. When he came to what we now call Mystic Lake in the northern part of the valley, he wrote: “We came to the banks of a large and pleasing lake, several leagues in circum- ference and as full of white geese as of water, they being so numerous that it looked like a large, white glove.” It is clear from these early descriptions that the San Jacinto Valley has long been a haven for wildlife. While much of the valley has been developed over the years, the San Jacinto Valley is still amazingly rich with birds and other wildlife, and has the potential to remain so in perpetuity. This pamphlet describes a few of the many birds that make the San Jacinto Valley their home. Some species are rare and need protection, while others are common. Some migrate to the San Jacinto Valley from thousands of miles away, while others spend their entire lives within the confi nes of the valley. Our hope is that you get to know the birds of the San Jacinto Valley, and are moved to help protect them for future generations. 2 The San Jacinto Valley is the fl oodplain of the San Jacinto River in western Riverside County.
    [Show full text]
  • Palms to Pines Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan
    Palms to Pines Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan PALMS TO PINES STATE SCENIC HIGHWAY CALIFORNIA STATE ROUTES 243 AND 74 June 2012 This document was produced by USDA Forest Service Recreation Solutions Enterprise Team with support from the Federal Highway Administration and in partnership with the USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region, the Bureau of Land Management, the California Department of Transportation, California State University, Chico Research Foundation and many local partners. The USDA, the BLM, FHWA and State of California are equal opportunity providers and employers. In accordance with Federal law, U.S. Department of Agriculture policy and U.S. Department of Interior policy, this institution is prohibited from discriminating on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age or disability. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720- 5964 (voice and TDD). Table of Contents Chapter 1 – The Palms to Pines Scenic Byway .........................................................................1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Benefits of National Scenic Byway Designation .......................................................................... 2 Corridor Management Planning .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • General Plan Amendment No. 1208 Lakeland Village Community Plan
    FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION General Plan Amendment No. 1208 Lakeland Village Community Plan State Clearinghouse No. 2020050501 Lead Agency: RIVERSIDE COUNTY Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 Contact: Mr. Robert Flores 951.955.1195 Prepared by: MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 3536 Concours Street Ontario, California 91764 Contact: Mr. Peter Minegar, CEP-IT 951.506.3523 June 2020 JN 155334 This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources. Section I Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration General Plan Amendment No. 1208 Lakeland Village Community Plan COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM: INITIAL STUDY Environmental Assessment (CEQ / EA) Number: N/A Project Case Type (s) and Number(s): General Plan Amendment No. 1208 (GPA No. 1208) Lead Agency Name: Riverside County Planning Department Address: 4080 Lemon Street, P.O. Box 1409, Riverside, CA 92502-1409 Contact Person: Robert Flores (Urban and Regional Planner IV) Telephone Number: 951-955-1195 Applicant’s Name: N/A Applicant’s Address: N/A I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project Description: BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT The County of Riverside is composed of approximately 7,300 square miles, bounded by Orange County to the west, San Bernardino County to the north, the State of Arizona to the east, and San Diego and Imperial Counties to the south. Development for the unincorporated County is guided by the Riverside County General Plan, which was last comprehensively updated and adopted in December 2015. The Riverside County General Plan is divided into 19 Area Plans covering most of the County (refer to Exhibit 1, Riverside County Area Plans).
    [Show full text]
  • Hydromodification Susceptibility Documentation Report and Mapping: Santa Ana Region
    Hydromodification Susceptibility Documentation Report and Mapping: Santa Ana Region January 18, 2017 Hydromodification Susceptibility Documentation Report and Mapping TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Hydrologic Condition of Concern (HCOC)................................................................................ 1 1.3 Goals and Objectives .................................................................................................................. 3 2 EXISTING CHANNEL DELINEATION MAP .................................................................................... 5 2.1 Research and Data Collection ..................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Delineation of Existing Stream Channels ................................................................................... 5 2.3 Existing Stream Channel Groups ................................................................................................ 5 2.4 Categorization of Existing Stream Channel Groups ................................................................... 6 3 SUSCEPTIBILITY ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Definition for "Engineered and
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog (Rana Muscosa)
    mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa) Southern California Distinct Population Segment 5-year Review: Summary and Evaluation Mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa) and habitat. Photocredit: Adam Backlin (USGS). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office Carlsbad, California July 13, 2012 2012 5-year Review for mountain yellow-legged frog 5-YEAR REVIEW mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa) Southern California Distinct Population Segment I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing of a species as endangered or threatened is based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species. In the 5-year review, we consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2019-2020 and FY 2020-21 Budget
    BUDGET Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District FISCAL YEAR 2020 AND 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL MANAGER BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS 4 GFOA Distinguished Budget Presentation Award 15 CSMFO Certificate of Award for Excellence in Operating Budget 16 BUDGET NARRATIVE 17 Description of the District and the Budget Process 18 Operating Revenues and Expenditures 24 Non-Operating Revenues and Expenditures 29 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS 36 Organization Chart 37 Summary of Changes in Authorized Positions 38 Authorized Position Listing 41 STRATEGIC PLAN & DEPARTMENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS 46 Strategic Plan 47 General Management 49 Business Services Division 53 Engineering & Operations Division 58 CAPITAL OUTLAYS 63 Significant Capital Outlays 64 Fiscal Year 2020 65 Fiscal Year 2021 66 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 67 Capital Improvement Projects 68 Fiscal Year 2020 & 2021 76 BUDGET STATEMENTS 79 Fund Structure 80 List of Funds/Programs 82 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Relationship between Divisions, Departments, Sections, and Funds 87 Summary of Revenues & Operating Transfers In/Out All Funds 88 Consolidated Statement of Sources and Uses 89 Statement of Sources and Uses of Funds Fiscal Year 2020 90 Statement of Sources and Uses of Funds Fiscal Year 2021 106 Consolidated Statement of Income 122 Computation of Debt Coverage 123 Debt Repayment Requirements & Sources Fiscal Year 2020 & 2021 124 Funding and Cash Flow Diagram 127 Significant Changes in Fund Balances 128 Schedule of Changes in Fund Balance, Fiscal Year 2020 129 Schedule of Changes
    [Show full text]
  • Notice Concerning Copyright Restrictions
    NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS This document may contain copyrighted materials. These materials have been made available for use in research, teaching, and private study, but may not be used for any commercial purpose. Users may not otherwise copy, reproduce, retransmit, distribute, publish, commercially exploit or otherwise transfer any material. The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be "used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research." If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. Geothermal Resources Council, TRANSACTIONS, Vol. 10, September 1986 GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION IN THE VICINITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Brian N. Damiata and Tien-Chang Lee Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 ABSTRACT Geothermal exploration in the Lake Elsinore area has primarily focused near a cross fault which acts as a conduit for thermal water. Flow testing of an exploratory hole indicates an ani- sotropic aquifer with a maximum transmissivity IO mi axis oriented along the fault striking N 11" E. Thermal water migrates laterally throughout the downtown area along a zone of enhanced transmissivity associated with the fault.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Ballot
    County of Riverside Consolidated General Election Registrar of Voters Tuesday, November 3, 2020 County Voter Information Guide Voter Assistance Centers October 31-November 2 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. IMPORTANT! VOTING HAS CHANGED! DETAILS INSIDE Election Day, November 3 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Suggested Location on Back Cover Registration Deadline October 19, 2020 Quick • Easy • Convenient This election every voter receives a Vote-By-Mail ballot. Additional Information Inside Request Language Assistance Form on Back Cover to receive election material translated in available selected languages. AVISO IMPORTANTE Una traducción en Español de esta Guía de Información del Condado Para el Votante puede obtenerse en la oficina del Registro de Votantes llamando al (951) 486- 7200 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS o (800) 773-VOTE (8683) o visite nuestro 2720 Gateway Drive, Riverside, CA 92507-0918 • (951) 486-7200 • (800) 773-VOTE (8683) • TTY (951) 697-8966 Mailing Address: 2724 Gateway Drive, Riverside, CA 92507-0918 sitio web www.voteinfo.net www.voteinfo.net THIS ELECTION VOTING IS DIFFERENT VOTE-BY-MAIL Vote at home using your Vote-By-Mail ballot No Postage Required Quick, easy, convenient... from the comfort of your home! OR BALLOT DROP-OFF LOCATION Drop off your ballot at any of the Ballot Drop-off locations in Riverside County No Postage Required See inside... for a list of drop-off locations throughout Riverside County! OR VOTER ASSISTANCE CENTER Vote in-person at any of the Voter Assistance Centers in Riverside County October 31-November 2, from 9:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]