1917 Gossip Column & News Articles
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
General Plan Amendment No. 1208 Lakeland Village Community Plan
FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION General Plan Amendment No. 1208 Lakeland Village Community Plan State Clearinghouse No. 2020050501 Lead Agency: RIVERSIDE COUNTY Planning Department 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 Contact: Mr. Robert Flores 951.955.1195 Prepared by: MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 3536 Concours Street Ontario, California 91764 Contact: Mr. Peter Minegar, CEP-IT 951.506.3523 June 2020 JN 155334 This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources. Section I Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration General Plan Amendment No. 1208 Lakeland Village Community Plan COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM: INITIAL STUDY Environmental Assessment (CEQ / EA) Number: N/A Project Case Type (s) and Number(s): General Plan Amendment No. 1208 (GPA No. 1208) Lead Agency Name: Riverside County Planning Department Address: 4080 Lemon Street, P.O. Box 1409, Riverside, CA 92502-1409 Contact Person: Robert Flores (Urban and Regional Planner IV) Telephone Number: 951-955-1195 Applicant’s Name: N/A Applicant’s Address: N/A I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project Description: BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT The County of Riverside is composed of approximately 7,300 square miles, bounded by Orange County to the west, San Bernardino County to the north, the State of Arizona to the east, and San Diego and Imperial Counties to the south. Development for the unincorporated County is guided by the Riverside County General Plan, which was last comprehensively updated and adopted in December 2015. The Riverside County General Plan is divided into 19 Area Plans covering most of the County (refer to Exhibit 1, Riverside County Area Plans). -
FY 2019-2020 and FY 2020-21 Budget
BUDGET Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District FISCAL YEAR 2020 AND 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL MANAGER BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS 4 GFOA Distinguished Budget Presentation Award 15 CSMFO Certificate of Award for Excellence in Operating Budget 16 BUDGET NARRATIVE 17 Description of the District and the Budget Process 18 Operating Revenues and Expenditures 24 Non-Operating Revenues and Expenditures 29 AUTHORIZED POSITIONS 36 Organization Chart 37 Summary of Changes in Authorized Positions 38 Authorized Position Listing 41 STRATEGIC PLAN & DEPARTMENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS 46 Strategic Plan 47 General Management 49 Business Services Division 53 Engineering & Operations Division 58 CAPITAL OUTLAYS 63 Significant Capital Outlays 64 Fiscal Year 2020 65 Fiscal Year 2021 66 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 67 Capital Improvement Projects 68 Fiscal Year 2020 & 2021 76 BUDGET STATEMENTS 79 Fund Structure 80 List of Funds/Programs 82 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Relationship between Divisions, Departments, Sections, and Funds 87 Summary of Revenues & Operating Transfers In/Out All Funds 88 Consolidated Statement of Sources and Uses 89 Statement of Sources and Uses of Funds Fiscal Year 2020 90 Statement of Sources and Uses of Funds Fiscal Year 2021 106 Consolidated Statement of Income 122 Computation of Debt Coverage 123 Debt Repayment Requirements & Sources Fiscal Year 2020 & 2021 124 Funding and Cash Flow Diagram 127 Significant Changes in Fund Balances 128 Schedule of Changes in Fund Balance, Fiscal Year 2020 129 Schedule of Changes -
Notice Concerning Copyright Restrictions
NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS This document may contain copyrighted materials. These materials have been made available for use in research, teaching, and private study, but may not be used for any commercial purpose. Users may not otherwise copy, reproduce, retransmit, distribute, publish, commercially exploit or otherwise transfer any material. The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be "used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research." If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. Geothermal Resources Council, TRANSACTIONS, Vol. 10, September 1986 GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION IN THE VICINITY OF LAKE ELSINORE, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Brian N. Damiata and Tien-Chang Lee Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 ABSTRACT Geothermal exploration in the Lake Elsinore area has primarily focused near a cross fault which acts as a conduit for thermal water. Flow testing of an exploratory hole indicates an ani- sotropic aquifer with a maximum transmissivity IO mi axis oriented along the fault striking N 11" E. Thermal water migrates laterally throughout the downtown area along a zone of enhanced transmissivity associated with the fault. -
Sample Ballot
County of Riverside Consolidated General Election Registrar of Voters Tuesday, November 3, 2020 County Voter Information Guide Voter Assistance Centers October 31-November 2 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. IMPORTANT! VOTING HAS CHANGED! DETAILS INSIDE Election Day, November 3 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Suggested Location on Back Cover Registration Deadline October 19, 2020 Quick • Easy • Convenient This election every voter receives a Vote-By-Mail ballot. Additional Information Inside Request Language Assistance Form on Back Cover to receive election material translated in available selected languages. AVISO IMPORTANTE Una traducción en Español de esta Guía de Información del Condado Para el Votante puede obtenerse en la oficina del Registro de Votantes llamando al (951) 486- 7200 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS o (800) 773-VOTE (8683) o visite nuestro 2720 Gateway Drive, Riverside, CA 92507-0918 • (951) 486-7200 • (800) 773-VOTE (8683) • TTY (951) 697-8966 Mailing Address: 2724 Gateway Drive, Riverside, CA 92507-0918 sitio web www.voteinfo.net www.voteinfo.net THIS ELECTION VOTING IS DIFFERENT VOTE-BY-MAIL Vote at home using your Vote-By-Mail ballot No Postage Required Quick, easy, convenient... from the comfort of your home! OR BALLOT DROP-OFF LOCATION Drop off your ballot at any of the Ballot Drop-off locations in Riverside County No Postage Required See inside... for a list of drop-off locations throughout Riverside County! OR VOTER ASSISTANCE CENTER Vote in-person at any of the Voter Assistance Centers in Riverside County October 31-November 2, from 9:00 a.m. -
Using Local Knowledge Graph Construction to Scale Seq2seq Models to Multi-Document Inputs
Using Local Knowledge Graph Construction to Scale Seq2Seq Models to Multi-Document Inputs Angela Fan Claire Gardent Chloe´ Braud Antoine Bordes FAIR / LORIA CNRS / LORIA CNRS / LORIA FAIR angelafan,[email protected] claire.gardent,[email protected] Abstract Query-based open-domain NLP tasks require information synthesis from long and diverse web results. Current approaches extrac- tively select portions of web text as input to Sequence-to-Sequence models using meth- ods such as TF-IDF ranking. We propose constructing a local graph structured knowl- edge base for each query, which compresses the web search information and reduces re- dundancy. We show that by linearizing the graph into a structured input sequence, models can encode the graph representations within a standard Sequence-to-Sequence setting. For two generative tasks with very long text in- put, long-form question answering and multi- document summarization, feeding graph rep- resentations as input can achieve better perfor- mance than using retrieved text portions. 1 Introduction Effective information synthesis is at the core of many Natural Language Processing applica- Figure 1: Multi-Document Input to Linearized Graph tions, such as open-domain question answering Multi-document input resulting from web search queries are converted to a graph structured knowledge base using coref- and multi-document summarization. In such tasks, erence resolution and information extraction, then linearized a fundamental challenge is the ability to distill rel- into a sequence for Seq2Seq models. Color indicates coref- evant knowledge from hundreds of thousands of erence resolution. Node weight is indicated by circle radius and edge weight by line thickness. -
The San Jacinto Watershed Component of the Santa Ana Integrated Watershed Plan
The San Jacinto Watershed Component of the Santa Ana Integrated Watershed Plan IRWM Plan Proposal for Integrated Regional Water Management Prop 50, Chapter 8 Planning Grant Application May 11, 2005 Submitted by: San Jacinto River Watershed Council Table of Contents ACRONYMS 5 A. BACKGROUND 7 Chapter 1 Executive Summary - Proposal Introduction and Objectives 7 Section 1 - Summary of Proposed Planning Grant Proposal 7 Section 2 - Why a Focused Component Plan? 9 Section 3 - Why Support This Proposal? 9 Chapter 2 - Regional Agency or Regional Water Management Group Description 11 Section 1 - Lead Agency 11 Section 2 - Funding Partners 11 Section 3 - Other Interested and Supporting Stakeholders 11 Section 4 - Plan for Adopting a Final Plan 12 Section 5 - Entities to Adopt Final Plan 12 Chapter 3 – Watershed Background 14 Section 1 - Overview of Project and Watershed Area 14 Section 2 - Physiographic Characteristics 16 Section 3 - Major Watershed Features 17 Gavilan Hills 19 Steele Peak 19 Motte-Rimrock Reserve 19 Section 4 - Internal Boundaries within the Region 21 Section 5 - Major Flood Control Infrastructure 21 Section 6 - Major Land Use Divisions 24 Section 7 - Description of Water Resources 26 Section 8 – Hydrometeorological Characteristics 29 Section 9 - Surface Water Quality 31 Section 10 - Water Supplies – Quantity and Quality 36 Section 11 - Areas of Special Biological Significance and other Sensitive Habitat 41 Section 12 - Values, Social and Cultural Makeup and Trends of the Regional Community 44 Section 13 - Economic Conditions -
A Case Study from the Temecula Area, Southwestern Riverside County, California
Land Subsidence (Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Land Subsidence, May 1991). IAHS Publ. no. 200,1991. Earth Fissures, Urbanization and Litigation: A Case Study from the Temecula Area, Southwestern Riverside County, California E. J. CORWIN, S. C. ALHADEFF, S. P. OGGEL Lorenz Alhadeff Lundin & Oggel, 101 West Broadway, Suite 1500, San Diego, CA 92101, USA R. J. SHLEMON P.O. Box 3066, Newport Beach, CA 92659 , USA ABSTRACT Ground fissures occurring in 1987 extended discontinuously along a 12-km long zone in the rapidly-urbanizing Temecula-Wolf Valley area of southwestern Riverside County, California. Impacted were new residential and industrial buildings. Litigation has ensued, and damage is now alleged to exceed about 50 million dollars. Defendants include County government, a local Water District, developers, and consulting engineers and geologists. INTRODUCTION In the mid-1980s, urbanization dramatically increased in the Temecula area of southwestern Riverside County, California. From a population of 8,324 in 1980, the previously serene town, about 41 km north of San Diego and 53 km southeast of Los Angeles, jumped to a population of over 29,000 in 1988 (Fig. 1). Developers seized on the increasing popularity of southern California as a desirable place to live, and vast new residential and light industrial complexes ("Business Parks") were built. The rapid urbanization produced the usual plethora of environmental constraints for both the developers and residents of Temecula. The most unexpected problem was the mid-1987 occurrence of earth fissures, the resulting allegations of property damage and general loss of value, and the perhaps inevitable litigation that has since followed. -
COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT for Communications Support and Strategy Services
Submission of Proposal COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT For Communications Support and Strategy services Submitted Friday, January 17, 2020, by: Erin Gilhuly Founder & President, CV Strategies [email protected] | ph: 760.641.0739 Palm Desert | Los Angeles | Sacramento cvstrategies.com | [email protected] | 760.776.1766 LOS ANGELES | PalM DESERT | SACRAMENTO January 17, 2020 Nabila Guzman Management Analyst I Costa Mesa Sanitary District 290 Paularino Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Dear Ms. Guzman, It is our privilege to present the attached proposal to the Costa Mesa Sanitary District regarding Communications Support and Strategy. This proposal is valid for 60 days from the due date of January 17, 2020. We understand the District is looking to retain a consulting firm and professional partner to provide support for strategic communications and outreach. CV Strategies has a long and successful history of helping special districts such as yours increase public engagement and build awareness of programs and services. CV Strategies is a comprehensive communications and public engagement firm with expertise in the water and wastewater industry. We are currently involved in active communications initiatives with more than 70 public agencies throughout California, providing a range of services that include content development, website design, social media, crisis communications, training, media relations, translation, strategic guidance, campaign planning, and graphic design. The main contact for this project is our Vice President, Tara Bravo, who can be reached directly at [email protected] or 510-300-5843. The CV Strategies team is available and standing by to begin work on this project. We look forward to collaborating with you and helping you realize your communication goals. -
4.10.1 SCOPE of REVIEW A. Water Service and Supply
SMP 2015-01 / RP 2006-01A2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 4.10 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS 4.10 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS This Subsection addresses the topics of water service and supply; wastewater collection and treatment; stormwater drainage management; solid waste collection and disposal; and utilities. The analysis contained in this Subsection is based in part on information obtained from the 2010 Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District (EVWMD) Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) (EVMWD, 2011a). A complete list of references can be found in EIR Section 7.0, References. 4.10.1 SCOPE OF REVIEW The Nichols Canyon Mine, as discussed in Section 2.0, Environmental Setting, is an existing, ongoing surface mining operation operating pursuant to vested mining rights and an approved reclamation plan (RP 2006-01A1), which was analyzed in a prior MND. Although the City has chosen to prepare an EIR for the Project here, the scope of review addresses those impacts resulting from the Project as described in Section 3.0, Project Description, and not impacts related to existing, approved operations, which form the environmental baseline, as discussed in Section 2.7, Existing Physical Site Conditions. Accordingly, this Subsection analyzes utilities and service systems impacts related to the Project specifically. This Subsection does not analyze utilities and service systems impacts related to existing, approved operations. 4.10.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Water Service and Supply Existing Site and Area Conditions The Nichols Canyon Mine is located within the service area of the EVMWD. At the time the EVMWD’s UWMP was prepared in 2010, the EVMWD estimated that there were approximately 123,375 people within its 96 square mile service area (EVMWD, 2011a, p. -
Riverside Local Agency Formation Commission 3850 Vine Street, Suite 110 Riverside, CA 92507-4225
Prepared for: Riverside Local Agency Formation Commission 3850 Vine Street, Suite 110 Riverside, CA 92507-4225 Prepared by: 1650 Spruce Street Suite 240 Riverside, California 92507 Contact: Wayne Fowler DRAFT – MARCH 2009 City of Temecula Municipal Services Review TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................1 1.1 Background............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Statutory Requirements ...........................................................................................1 1.3 Service Review Process & Methodology………………………………………....2 1.4 Determinations from Prior MSR…………………………………………….…….3 2.0 CITY OF TEMECULA.....................................................................................................4 2.1 Overview................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Planning Boundaries and Growth ........................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Sphere of Influence……………………………………..…………………6 2.2.2 Planning Boundaries................................................................................... 6 2.2.3 Growth Projections..................................................................................... 8 2.3 Administration and Operations............................................................................. 12 2.3.1 City Governance...................................................................................... -
Activities of the Water Resources Division, California District, Fiscal Year 1993 U
ACTIVITIES OF THE WATER RESOURCES DIVISION CALIFORNIA DISTRICT, FISCAL YEAR 1993 Compiled by Myrna L. DeBortoli U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 94-67 Sacramento, California 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert M. Hirsch, Acting Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For sale by the U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center Open-File Reports Section Box 25286, MS 517 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For additional information write to: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey Federal Building, Room W-2233 2800 Cottage Way Sacramento, CA 95825 MESSAGE FROM THE DISTRICT CHIEF The U.S. Geological Survey has been describing the water resources of California for more than 100 years. The California District consists of 250 staff members at nine locations, all of whom have contributed in some way to the studies described in this report. To accomplish the mission of describing the water resources of the State, the Survey staff works with more than 130 cooperating local, State, and Federal agencies with common interests in this most valuable resource. Climate extremes, such as the recent drought which is still fresh in people's minds, serve to focus our attention on the need for timely, high-quality water information. The flooding that occurred in southern California during the winter of 1992-93 is a reminder that climate extremes can change quickly. The studies described in this report cover a wide range of water issues in California that are important to water managers and scientists. -
9.3 PISGAH 1 2 3 9.3.1 Background and Summary of Impacts 4 5 6 9.3
1 9.3 PISGAH 2 3 4 9.3.1 Background and Summary of Impacts 5 6 7 9.3.1.1 General Information 8 9 The proposed Pisgah SEZ has a total area of 23,950 acres (97 km2) and is located in 10 San Bernardino County in southeastern California, about 100 mi (160 km) northeast of Los 11 Angeles (Figure 9.3.1.1-1). In 2008, the county population was 2,086,465. The nearest 12 population center to the SEZ is the City of Barstow, which is located about 25 mi (40 km) to 13 the west of the SEZ and had a 2008 population of 24,596. Interstate 40 (I-40) runs east–west 14 through the proposed Pisgah SEZ, bisecting it into a northern portion that contains about two- 15 thirds of the SEZ acreage and a southern portion with the remainder of the acreage. Access to the 16 SEZ from I-40 is available from exits at Fort Cady Road (to the west of the SEZ), Hector Road 17 (midway through the SEZ), and Pisgah Crater Road (at the eastern end of the SEZ). Hector Road 18 runs north–south through the middle of the SEZ, and a number of other local dirt roads cross the 19 SEZ. The National Trails Highway (historic U.S. 66) also passes through the SEZ as it runs 20 south of and parallel to I-40. The BNSF Railroad serves the area and traverses the SEZ from the 21 northwest to the southeast, running approximately parallel to and about 0.8 mi (1.3 km) north of 22 I-40.