DOCSLIB.ORG

1St Quarter FY19 (Oct – Dec 2018)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1St Quarter FY19 (Oct – Dec 2018) Conservation, Land and Natural USAID South Sudan: Resource Management for Resilience, Conflict Mitigation, and Improved Livelihoods in the Boma-Badingilo Landscape South Sudan 1st Quarter FY19 (Oct – Dec 2018) January 31, 2019 This publication was prepared for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Wildlife Conservation Society. Conservation, Land and Natural Resource Management for Resilience, Conflict Mitigation, and Improved Livelihoods in the Boma-Badingilo Landscape South Sudan FY 2019 Q1 Progress Report (October 01 – December 31, 2018) Report Type: Quarterly Cooperative Agreement Award No. 72066818CA00001 Period Ending: September, 2021 Prepared by Wildlife Conservation Society South Sudan Program WCS Headquarters Address 1200 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10460 The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................ 4 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 5 Key achievements (Qualitative Impact) .............................................................................. 5 Component One: Increased Capacity, Plans and Systems in Place to Sustainably Manage Land and Natural Resources and Mitigate Resource Based Conflict ....................................................... 5 Component Two: Effective, Participatory, and Broadly Supported Wildlife Conservation and Protected Area Management in Place ............................................................................................ 6 Component Three: Community resilience and improved livelihoods ............................................ 7 Component Four: Partnerships for Natural Resources Management and Community Resilience in the Boma-Badingilo Landscape ................................................................................................... 8 Cross Cutting Issues ......................................................................................................... 8 Gender ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Cultural sensitivity ........................................................................................................................... 8 Other ............................................................................................................................................... 9 Program Progress (Quantitative Impact) ............................................................................ 9 The target is set on zero as this will require engagement with Central Government which is not permitted under this grant. This shall be reviewed as needed and as directed by USAID. ............ 9 Project Administration ...................................................................................................... 10 I. KEY ACHIEVEMENTS (Qualitative Impact) ................................................................... 11 Component One: Increased Capacity, Plans and Systems in Place to Sustainably Manage Land and Natural Resources and Mitigate Resource Based Conflict ............................... 11 Result 1.1: Effective plans and capacity in place for Boma and Badingilo National Parks areas for protecting and managing wildlife, habitats, and conflict mitigation. ........................................... 11 Result 1.2: Communities in a set of priority areas in and around Boma and Badingilo parks and within connecting corridors have plans in place for sustainable land and natural resources management. ................................................................................................................................ 12 Result 1.3: Improved understanding of the links between livelihoods, wildlife and natural resource management around Boma and Badingilo parks. ......................................................... 12 Component Two: Effective, Participatory, and broadly Supported Wildlife Conservation and Protected Area Management in Place....................................................................... 13 Result 2.1: Secure wildlife and biodiversity in Boma and Badingilo parks and associated migratory corridors. ...................................................................................................................... 13 Result 2.2: Up to date information is available on wildlife populations and biodiversity in the landscape area informing adaptive management interventions. ................................................. 14 Component Three: Community resilience and improved livelihoods ................................ 15 Result 3.1: Increased Economic Resilience ................................................................................... 15 Result 3.2: Community based technical services are available to assist communities and households recover from and adapt to climate related shocks. .................................................. 16 Component Four: Partnerships for natural resources management and community resilience in the Boma-Badingilo landscape. .................................................................... 16 Result 4.1: Platform for coordinated sustainable development established and functioning effectively. ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Cross Cutting Issues ....................................................................................................... 17 Gender .......................................................................................................................................... 17 Cultural sensitivity ......................................................................................................................... 17 Other ............................................................................................................................................. 17 Environmental Compliance .............................................................................................. 18 2 Lessons Learned ............................................................................................................. 18 II. PROGRAM PROGRESS (Quantitative Impact) ......................................................... 19 Standard Indicators ......................................................................................................... 19 No. hectares in areas of biological significance under improved management as a result of USG assistance. ..................................................................................................................................... 19 Number of people with increased economic benefits derived from sustainable natural resource management and conservation as a result of USG assistance. .................................................... 22 Number of people trained in sustainable natural resources management and/or biodiversity conservation as a result of USG assistance. .................................................................................. 22 This includes the total number of people trained on sustainable NRM under the project, including livelihoods trainings, ranger trainings, resource mapping trainings, conflict mitigation training, etc. .................................................................................................................................. 22 Number of laws, policies, or regulations that address biodiversity conservation and/or other environmental themes officially proposed, adopted, or implemented as a result of USG assistance. ..................................................................................................................................... 22 Number of people that apply improved conservation law enforcement practices as a result of USG assistance. ............................................................................................................................. 23 Custom Indicators ............................................................................................................ 24 Number of km. patrolled by wildlife forces and by aerial patrols. ............................................... 24 Number of coverage (ha.) of formal conservation-security partnerships in place with local communities. ................................................................................................................................ 25 Number of law enforcement results: segregated by arrests, confiscations and convictions. ...... 25 III. MONITORING .......................................................................................................... 27 3 Acronyms and Abbreviations ART Anyuak Recovery Trust BaNP Badingilo National Park BNP Boma National Park CBNRM Community Based Natural Resource Management CBO Community Based Organization CEPO Community Empowerment for Progress Organization CSO Civil Society Organization EMMP Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Plan FY Financial Year GEF Global Environment Facility GPS Global Positioning System (I)NGO (International) Non-Governmental Organization LEM Law Enforcement Monitoring LSGP Livelihoods Small Grants Program MWCT Ministry of Wildlife Conservation
Load more
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...

23 pages remaining, click to load more.

Recommended publications
  • The Economic, Cultural and Ecosystem Values of the Sudd Wetland in South Sudan: an Evolutionary Approach to Environment and Development
    The Economic, Cultural and Ecosystem Values of the Sudd Wetland in South Sudan: An Evolutionary Approach to Environment and Development JOHN GOWDY HANNES LANG Professor of Economics and Professor of Science Research Associate & Technology Studies School of Life Sciences Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Technical University Munich Troy New York, 12180 USA 85354 Freising, Germany gowdyj@rpi.edu hanneslang1@gmail.com The Economic, Cultural and Ecosystem Values of the Sudd Wetland in South Sudan 1 Contents About the Authors ....................................................................................................................2 Key Findings of this Report .......................................................................................................3 I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 II. The Sudd ............................................................................................................................ 8 III. Human Presence in the Sudd ..............................................................................................10 IV. Development Threats to the Sudd ........................................................................................ 11 V. Value Transfer as a Framework for Developing the Sudd Wetland ......................................... 15 VI. Maintaining the Ecosystem Services of the Sudd: An Evolutionary Approach to Development and the Environment ...........................................26
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 1. Southern Sudan's Protected Areas
    United Nations Development Programme Country: Sudan PROJECT DOCUMENT Launching Protected Area Network Management and Building Capacity in Post-conflict Project Title: Southern Sudan By end of 2012, poverty especially among vulnerable groups is reduced and equitable UNDAF economic growth is increased through improvements in livelihoods, food security, decent Outcome(s): employment opportunities, sustainable natural resource management and self reliance; UNDP Strategic Plan Environment and Sustainable Development Primary Outcome: Catalyzing access to environmental finance UNDP Strategic Plan Secondary Outcome: Mainstreaming environment and energy Expected CP Outcome(s): Strengthened capacity of national, sub-national, state and local institutions and communities to manage the environment and natural disasters to reduce conflict over natural resources Expected CPAP Output(s) 1. National and sub-national, state and local institutions and communities capacities for effective environmental governance, natural resources management, conflict and disaster risk reduction enhanced. 2. Comprehensive strategic frameworks developed at national and sub-national levels regarding environment and natural resource management Executing Entity/Implementing Partner: NGO Execution Modality – WCS in cooperation with the Ministry of Wildlife Conservation and Tourism of the Government of Southern Sudan (MWCT-GoSS) Implementing Entity/Responsible Partners: United Nations Development Programme Brief Description The current situation Despite the 1983 to 2005 civil war, many areas of Southern Sudan still contain areas of globally significant habitats and wildlife populations. For example, Southern Sudan contains one of the largest untouched savannah and woodland ecosystems remaining in Africa as well as the Sudd, the largest wetland in Africa, of inestimable value to the flow of the River Nile, the protection of endemic species and support of local livelihoods.
    [Show full text]
  • END-OF-PROJECT EVALUATION BOMA-JONGLEI-EQUATORIA LANDSCAPE (BJEL) PROGRAM Performance Evaluation, 2008-2017
    END-OF-PROJECT EVALUATION BOMA-JONGLEI-EQUATORIA LANDSCAPE (BJEL) PROGRAM Performance Evaluation, 2008-2017 OCTOBER 2017 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). It was prepared by the Evaluation Team, which comprised: Leo Bill Emerson (team leader), Alex B. Muhweezi (biodiversity expert) and James Thubo Ayul Ph.D. (livelihoods expert). END-OF-PROJECT EVALUATION BOMA-JONGLEI-EQUATORIA LANDSCAPE (BJEL) PROGRAM Performance Evaluation, 2008-2017 Contracted under 607300.01.060 Monitoring and Evaluation Support Project DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) ABSTRACT This is an end-of-program performance evaluation report for the Boma-Jonglei-Equatoria Landscape (BJEL) program covering the 2008-2017 whose purpose is to assess the effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability and impact of the BJEL program. The results of the evaluation will inform future programming of similar project activities by USAID/South Sudan, the implementing partner Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), Government of the Republic of South Sudan (GRSS) entities and other donor organizations. The evaluation utilized a mixed-method approach, relying on quantitative and qualitative data from both primary and secondary sources, based on a set of indicators. The Evaluation interrogated information obtained and provided responses to the following five evaluation questions. a. How effective was the BJEL program in achieving project objectives? b. Did the project achieve the right focus and balance in terms of design, theory of change/development hypothesis, and strengthening strategies for sustainable safeguards of the wildlife population needs of South Sudan? c.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on the Interaction Between Security and Wildlife Conservation in Sub-Saharan Africa Summary Report
    Study on the interaction between security and wildlife conservation in sub-Saharan Africa Summary report International Cooperation and Development 2 | STUDY ON THE INTERACTION BETWEEN SECURITY AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA - SUMMARY Foreword Illegal wildlife trafficking is a serious and growing problem. The global trade is estimated to be worth tens of billions of euros and to include hundreds of millions of plant and animal specimens. It threatens the survival of iconic species, including elephants, rhinos and tigers, as well as thousands of lesser-known mammals, reptiles and birds. Illegal, unregulated and unreported fishing has devastating impacts on fish stocks and the livelihoods of coastal communities. Perpetrators have little to fear as many countries lack adequate laws and sanctions to penalise them. In addition to the direct ecological impacts of wildlife and forest crime, there is growing evidence that the corruption that enables it to flourish feeds a spiral that undermines the rule of law, fosters other criminal activities and fuels insecurity. However, our understanding of the precise ways that wildlife trafficking and insecurity are linked remains incomplete, and in particular the involvement of armed insurgencies and terrorist groups. This study brings together robust information drawn from over 20 marine and terrestrial sites in sub-Saharan Africa and shines a spotlight on the nature and extent of the links between security, including socio-economic security, and wildlife (protection of species and ecosystems,
    [Show full text]
  • Peste Des Petits Ruminants at the Wildlife-Livestock Interface
    Supplementary Material - Peste des Petits Ruminants at the Wildlife-Livestock Interface in the Northern Albertine Rift and Nile Basin, East Africa History of PPR in East Africa The first PPR cases described in livestock from East Africa date from 1971-1972 in Sudan [1], followed by outbreaks in Ethiopia, suspected since 1977 and confirmed in 1989-1990 [2]. Serology also indicated the exposure of sheep and goats to PPRV from the Karamoja region of northeastern Uganda in 1985 and in northern and western regions of Kenya in 1987-1991 [3], suggesting that PPRV may have had occasional incursion into other East African countries. An endemic situation with almost yearly incidence of PPR livestock outbreaks was already established by 2000 in Sudan and Ethiopia [4,5], but based on serology of wild animal populations, the virus apparently did not persist further south in East Africa (Table S2) [6]. This apparent barrier may well reflect the continued circulation of RPV in East Africa up until 2002 and vaccination beyond until its final elimination reported in 2011 [7]. Rinderpest is a close relative to PPR, serologically indistinguishable by some ELISAs and for which infection is cross protective. The first PPR cases described this century in Uganda were in Soroti district in 2003, without much epidemiological information [8]. This corresponds with previous reports of PPR cases in areas from South Sudan (former Sudan) near to the Ugandan border in 2002 and suspected PPR and antibody detection in livestock from Tanzania 2004 (Table S1) [9]. In 2006-2008, the first official and large PPR outbreak was reported in Kenya and was also associated with disease in the bordering Uganda region of Karamoja in 2007-2008 and northern Tanzania in 2008 [4,9,10].
    [Show full text]
  • NBI/Nile Basin Initiative (NBI) Eastern Nile Subsidiary Action Program (ENSAP) Eastern Nile Technical Regional Office (ENTRO)
    NILE BASIN INITIATIVE (NBI) EASTERN NILE SUBSIDIARY ACTION PROGRAM (ENSAP) EASTERN NILE TECHNICAL REGIONAL OFFICE (ENTRO) Photo Fishing on the White Nile, at Bor: by Henry Busulwa BARO AKOBO SOBAT WETLANDS KNOWLEDGE BASE CONSULTANCY DRAFT REPORT BUSULWA HENRY SSEBULIBA CONSULTANT, WETLANDS AND BIODIVERSITY The Netherland Grant to ENTRO Reference No.: Contract Ref. No. : 02//IC/12 June 2012 1 Table of Contents List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 4 1.0 Background ......................................................................................................................... 7 2. 0 The Baro Akobo Sobat System ........................................................................................... 7 2.1 The Main Rivers of Baro Akobo Basin .......................................................................... 10 2.2 Aspects of Rainfall and hydrology of the BAS sub basins. .......................................... 10 2.3 Aspects of the Wetlands of the BAS ............................................................................ 12 2.4. Proposed developments for BAS ................................................................................ 14 3. 0 Objective of the Consultancy ...................................................................................... 14 3.1 Consultancy Main
    [Show full text]
  • A0 Portrait Poster Template
    Analyzing the effect of armed conflict, agriculture and fire on the movement and migratory behaviour of White eared kob and Roan antelope in the Boma-Gambella landscape of Ethiopia and South Sudan By: Kassahun Abera and Afework Bekele (Prof.). 1. Introduction 3. Results 3.3. Response of wildlife to armed conflict, livestock and agriculture 3.1. Trends in the abundance and distribution patterns 1.1. Background a. White eared kob a. White eared kob Wildlife migration routes and home ranges were found to be Wildlife migrations are indicators for functionality and connectivity of land or overlapping with armed conflict hotspots and livestock ranges in the Table 1. Population estimates of White eared kob seascapes; hence the disruption of this phenomena indicates a socio- landscape. political and environmental crisis. Wildlife ecologists are nowadays, equipped Survey Zone/Year 2010 2013 2015 with technological tools that allow them to obtain data about the dynamics of Core 203,181 292,688 399,299 animal’s movements and behaviours (Silke et al., 2011). The concept of South 51,962 58,479 29,169 home range is a multi-dimensional space in a landscape or a cognitive map Combined 255,143 351,167 428,468 of the species about its environment, which is indeed behavioural response, and not only delineations of species habitat zones (Roger and Michael, 2012). The behavioural components of movement ecology, like decision- The most widely distributed species with a making in navigation and orientation, habitat selection and dispersal are considerable population outside of the associated with features and the state of landscape ecology (Bolen and current protected area system (Fig.2).
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Giraffe Conservation Status Report September 2020
    Country Profile Republic of South Sudan Giraffe Conservation Status Report September 2020 N.B. Although the focus of this profile is on the Republic of South Sudan, reference is made to the historical occurrence of giraffe in the historical Sudan. General statistics Size of country: 644,329 km² Size of protected areas / percentage protected area coverage: 11.1% Species and subspecies In 2016 the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) completed the first detailed assessment of the conservation status of giraffe, revealing that their numbers are in peril. This was further emphasised when the majority of the IUCN recognised subspecies where assessed in 2018 – some as Critically Endangered. While this update further confirms the real threat to one of Africa’s most charismatic megafauna, it also highlights a rather confusing aspect of giraffe conservation: how many species/subspecies of giraffe are there? The IUCN currently recognises one species (Giraffa camelopardalis) and nine subspecies of giraffe (Muller et al. 2018) historically based on outdated assessments of their morphological features and geographic ranges. The subspecies are thus divided: Angolan giraffe (G. c. angolensis), Kordofan giraffe (G. c. antiquorum), Masai giraffe (G. c. tippleskirchi), Nubian giraffe (G. c. camelopardalis), reticulated giraffe (G. c. reticulata), Rothschild’s giraffe (G. c. rothschildi), South African giraffe (G. c. giraffa), Thornicroft’s giraffe (G. c. thornicrofti) and West African giraffe (G. c. peralta). However, over the past decade GCF together with their partner Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F) have performed the first-ever comprehensive DNA sampling and analysis (genomic, nuclear and mitochondrial) from all major natural populations of giraffe throughout their range in Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • CS 11.2 Dinder National Park: an Ecosystem Under Siege
    SUDAN POST-CONFLICT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT The infrastructure and staff capacity The core of the park Although many have been of Dinder National Park were greatly is comprised of poached, the park still improved thanks to a grant from the wetlands that are supports a significant Global Environment Facility, but sufficient critically important as population of larger and sustainable government funding is reliable sources mammals. Warthogs are urgently needed now that GEF support of water in the dry very common in the park’s has come to an end (left) season (top right) wetlands (bottom right) CS 11.2 Dinder National Park: an ecosystem under siege Dinder National Park is the most important terrestrial protected area in the northern states of Sudan. Located on the Ethiopian border, straddling Blue Nile and Kassala states, it is approximately 10,000 km² in size. The most important features of the park are a series of permanent and seasonal wetlands known locally as mayas, which are linked to streams running off the Ethiopian highlands to the east. The habitat and wildlife of Dinder National Park can currently be described as badly degraded and under serious threat from a number of ongoing problems, including encroachment, habitat degradation and poaching. Until the 1960s, the area surrounding Dinder was relatively uninhabited. Since then, however, migration and land use changes have resulted in development around the park, to the extent that some forty villages now exist along its borders. Large-scale mechanized agriculture to the north and west has not only pushed traditional agricultural communities to the edge of the park, but by taking over most of the land previously used for grazing, has also led pastoralists to invade the park in large numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of Cheetah (Acinonyx Jubatus) Biology, Ecology and Conservation Strategies on Namibian Farmlands
    Aspects of Cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) Biology, Ecology and Conservation Strategies on Namibian Farmlands by Laurie L. Marker Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor Of Philosophy Lady Margaret Hall, University of Oxford Trinity Term 2002 ASPECTS OF CHEETAH (ACINONYX JUBATUS) BIOLOGY, ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION STRATEGIES ON NAMIBIAN FARMLANDS Summary In an increasingly human-dominated environment, the task of successfully conserving large carnivores, such as cheetahs, is difficult due to real or perceived threats resulting in conflict and often their local extirpation. This research describes the causes and potential solutions to this conflict in Namibia. Cheetah biology and ecology were studied through physical examination, laboratory analysis, radio-tracking and human perceptions using survey techniques. Between 1991 and 2000 data collected on over 400 live-captured and dead cheetahs showed that a perceived threat to livestock or game was the reason for 91.2% (n = 343) of cheetahs captured and 47.6% (n = 30) of wild cheetah deaths. Both were biased towards males, with 2.9 males being captured for every female, despite an apparent equality of sex ratio. Human-mediated mortality accounted for 79.4% (n = 50) of wild deaths reported, of which the majority involved prime adult animals, with a peak at around 5-6 years of age. Polymorphic microsatellite loci were used to assess 313 Namibian cheetahs’ variation, gene flow, paternity and behavioural ecology. Genetic analysis showed limited regional differentiation supporting a panmictic population and that persistence in Namibia depends on dispersal from regions throughout the country; therefore efforts of connectivity throughout the country should continue. Relatedness values confirmed family groups, and 45 new potential sire/dam offspring and 7 sibling groups were identified, providing information on dispersal and the success of translocation.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the Effect of Armed Conflict, Agriculture and Fire on The
    ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF NATURAL AND COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCES Analyzing the effect of armed conflict, agriculture and fire on the movement and migratory behaviour of White eared kob and Roan antelope in the Boma-Gambella landscape of Ethiopia and South Sudan A Thesis submitted to the Department of Zoological Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Sciences in Ecological and Systematic Zoology By Kasahun Abera Legesse Advisor Prof. Afework Bekele Addis Ababa University Addis Ababa, Ethiopia June 2018 ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES Analyzing the effect of armed conflict, agriculture and fire on the movement and migratory behaviour of White eared kob and Roan antelope in the Boma-Gambella landscape of Ethiopia and South Sudan By Kasahun Abera Legesse June 2018 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this thesis to those scouts, wildlife experts, scientists and game wardens who have lost their lives in the struggle to sustain wildlife of Ethiopia and the world at large. I will be pursuing their dreams and vision in the rest of my life so that their sacrifices don’t end up in vain. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My first gratitude goes to my advisor, Professor Afework Bekele. It was an honor for me to be his student and have my thesis consulted with him. Thank you for putting your thrust on me and the directions to explore new horizons in wildlife movement ecology. I would like to acknowledge the financial support from the thematic research project at Addis Ababa University.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheetah Acinonyx Jubatus on CMS Appendix I (Except Populations of Namibia, Botswana and Zimbabwe)
    1 of 18 Proposal I / 4/Rev.1 PROPOSAL FOR INCLUSION OF SPECIES ON THE APPENDICES OF THE CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY SPECIES OF WILD ANIMALS A. PROPOSAL: Include the Cheetah Acinonyx jubatus on CMS Appendix I (except populations of Namibia, Botswana and Zimbabwe) B. PROPONENT: Government of Algeria C. SUPPORTING STATEMENT: 1. Taxon 1.1 Classis Mammalia 1.2 Ordo Carnivora 1.4 Familia Felidae 1.5 Species Acinonyx jubatus (Schreber, 1775) Common name(s) English: Cheetah French: Guépard Spanish: Chita 1.6 Taxonomy and evolution Cheetah ancestors seem to have originated in North America about 4 million years ago during the Pliocene period (5.2 to 1.6 million years ago). This cheetah relative, Miracinonyx, appears to be a common ancestor of both the cheetah and the puma (cougar). During the Ice Age, Miracinonyx migrated across continents. Its descendants developed the characteristics that make the cheetah the unique animal that it is today. Cheetahs hunted prey in the open plains as grasslands replaced forests during this time period. The sleek characteristics of the modern cheetahs became more prominent. This was especially evident in reduced body size and elongated limbs. The modern cheetah evolved into its present form about 200,000 years ago. Cheetah relatives had worldwide distribution until about 20,000 years ago. They were common throughout Africa, Asia, Europe and North America. Genetic research has shown that today’s cheetah populations are descendants of but a few animals that remained after the Pleistocene era about 10,000 years ago, at which point the population experienced a founder event generally referred to as a population bottleneck (Menotti-Raymond and O'Brien 1993, O'Brien et al.
    [Show full text]