Induced and Opportunity Cost and Benefit Patterns in the Context of Cost-Benefit Analysis in the Field of Environment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Induced and Opportunity Cost and Benefit Patterns in the Context of Cost-Benefit Analysis in the Field of Environment Risk & Policy Analysts/Metroeconomica Induced and Opportunity Cost and Benefit Patterns in the Context of Cost-Benefit Analysis in the Field of Environment Final Report - February 1999 prepared for European Commission DGIII - Industry by Risk & Policy Analysts Limited, Farthing Green House, 1 Beccles Road, Loddon, Norfolk, NR14 6LT, UK Tel: +44 1508 528465 Fax: +44 1508 520758 email: [email protected] and Metroeconomica 108 Bloomfield Road, Bath, Avon, BA2 2AR, UK RPA REPORT - ASSURED QUALITY Project: Ref/Title J241/CBA Approach: As set out in RPA Proposal and taking account of associated discussions. Report Status: Final Report Report prepared by: M Postle, Director of RPA A Markandya, Director of Metroeconomica R Boyd, Consultant with Metroeconomica M Hickman, Consultant with RPA Report approved for issue by: M Postle, Director of RPA Date: 2 February 1999 i Risk & Policy Analysts/Metroeconomica ii Risk & Policy Analysts/Metroeconomica CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Key Characteristics of Environmental Policies 1 1.2 The Appraisal Tools 2 1.3 Scope of the Report 4 1.4 Structure of the Report 4 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Externalities 7 2.3 Cost-Benefit Analysis 8 2.4 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis 9 2.5 Direct Effects 10 2.6 Indirect and Induced Effects 11 2.7 Secondary Effects 12 2.8 Opportunity Costs and Benefits 13 3. A FRAMEWORK FOR COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS 3.1 Introduction 17 3.2 Boundary Issues in CBA 19 3.3 Key Analytical Issues in CBA 27 4. IMPACTS AND THEIR VALUATION 4.1 Introduction 31 4.2 Estimation of Impacts on Industry and Consumers 31 4.3 Administrative Costs 34 4.4 Employment 34 4.5 Environmental Effect 36 4.6 The Valuation of Mortality Impacts 43 4.7 Morbidity Effects 60 4.8 Key Issues 61 *5. AIR POLLUTION CASE STUDY 5.1 Policy Overview 69 5.2 Scope of the Analysis 70 5.3 Comprehensive CBA of the Policy 81 5.4 Cost-Effectiveness and Opportunity Costs 96 *6. MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE CASE STUDY 6.1 Policy Overview 97 iii Risk & Policy Analysts/Metroeconomica 6.2 Scope of the Analysis 98 6.3 Indirect and Secondary Costs and Benefits 110 6.4 Comprehensive CBA Framework 115 6.5 The Opportunity Costs Question 118 7. Municipal Solid Waste Case Study 7.1 Policy Overview 113 7.2 Scope of the Analysis 114 7.3 Excluded Indirect and Secondary Costs and Benefits 126 7.4 Comprehensive CBA Framework 131 7.5 The Opportunity Costs Question 134 8. Short-Chain Length Chlorinated Paraffins Case Study 8.1 Policy Overview 139 8.2 Scope of the Analysis 139 8.3 Comprehensive CBA of the Policy 142 8.4 Cost-Effectiveness and Opportunity Costs 146 9. Opportunity costs and Policy Evaluation 9.1 Introduction 147 9.2 Opportunity Costs and Valuation 148 9.3 Policy Selection Criteria 152 9.4 Cost-Effectiveness and Opportunity Costs 160 9.5 Opportunity Costs in EU Policy Making 163 10. Summary and Conclusions 169 10.1 Overview 169 10.2 The Economic Appraisal Methods 169 10.3 The Valuation of Costs and Benefits 171 10.4 The Opportunity Costs Issue 174 10.5 Opportunity Cost at the Cross-Policy Level 177 10.6 Guidelines for Policy Makers 178 10.7 Recommendations for Further Research 180 11. References 181 ANNEX 1: DIRECT COSTS AND BENEFITS ANNEX 2: GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM EQUATIONS Page 4 Risk & Policy Analysts/Metroeconomica 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Key Characteristics of Environmental Policies Governments need to make choices and when faced with the protection of either the environment or human health, two truisms must be recognised. The first is that such protection does not come ‘free’, and the second is that such choices are constrained by limited resources. Decisions makers, therefore, need to balance the benefits of protection against the cost of such protection, especially when resources could be allocated to other policy areas (such as health, education, transport, etc.), which may be able to provide comparable levels of protection or other gains. What are the costs and benefits associated with environmental policies? In general, they are the same range of effects which may be of concern in any policy appraisal, with the potential characteristics of importance being: • the scale and relative magnitude of the direct policy effects, and hence potential for such effects to lead to further indirect and secondary effects; • the level of integration of the affected industry sectors and hence the potential for impacts on related markets; • the degree to which equity considerations are of concern given the likely divergence between those who would gain and those who would lose; • related to the above, the degree to which the policy affects all EU countries equally and countries outside the EU; • the relative significance of both environmental and human health effects, where this includes both the negative and positive effects of the policy; • the inter-relationship with other policies and policy areas; and • the timing and duration of policy measures. The first two characteristics are important in that they help set the boundaries for any policy appraisal. Firstly, they establish a role in establishing the degree to which more than just the direct compliance costs of the policy will need to be taken into account. Secondly, and related to the above, they determine the type of appraisal required. For example, if a policy results in non-marginal changes, then ‘conventional’ Cost-benefit analysis (CBA), which is based on partial equilibrium analysis, is no longer an appropriate appraisal framework. In such circumstances, a general equilibrium type of approach is required. This type of approach automatically considers the so-called ‘wider’ effects. As will be discussed later in this report, where a regulation affects a product acting as a minor input to a production process the analysis is likely to require the consideration of only the direct costs to industry and the direct environmental and human health effects associated with the adoption of an alternative product. However, where a policy affects a product which accounts for a significant share of production costs, and/or affects an industry sector which is highly integrated with other sectors of the economy, then the analysis may need to go wider. In this case, the analysis may need to consider the effects Page 5 Risk & Policy Analysts/Metroeconomica of the policy on the structure and functioning of the whole economy (including direct, indirect and possible secondary effects. Examples abound of both types of environmental policy, with many hazardous chemical management policies falling into the first category and environmental taxes falling into the second category. With regard to the other characteristics, however, it is more difficult to make any generalisations. The implications of these will vary in importance across policies on a case-by-case basis. Indeed, the first two characteristics are likely to determine the importance of the other aspects. It is also useful to consider whether policies aimed at protecting the different environmental media (air, water, land) or at protecting human health may have fundamentally different characteristics and thus appraisal requirements. Consider a series of policies: • a policy aimed at reducing sewage effluent discharges into the aquatic environment by requiring secondary and tertiary treatment; • a policy aimed at reducing damages associated with acidifying emissions from industrial and power plant sources; and • a policy aimed at reducing health effects to workers by placing restrictions on the use of a widely used chemical. The first policy will obviously have direct effects on the associated utilities and if sewage treatment costs increase significantly may also have indirect effects on other industrial sectors. It will also have direct benefits to the aquatic environment, but contrastingly may result in negative effects to the other environmental media. For example, the generation of additional sewage sludge will require some form of disposal, whether to land, through landfill, composting or the use of incineration. Similarly, a policy aimed at reducing acidification related effects will result in direct and indirect effects on industry, but may also have wider macro-economic effects should it affect the energy prices paid by consumers for example. Although it may provide benefits across the range of environmental media (and to a number of different impact categories) and to human health, there will also be negative effects associated with particular treatment technologies and the need to dispose of their residuals (e.g. ash). With regard to the chemical restrictions, as they would affect a widely used chemical, there may be direct effects on a range of industry sectors, but the degree to which these result in indirect effects would depend on the change in costs faced by those sectors. Although the policy should generate direct health benefits for the relevant workers, indirect damages may arise from the introduction of substitute chemicals which may pose their own health or environmental risks. 1.2 The Appraisal Tools The issues which must be examined within any policy appraisal may therefore be complex, requiring consideration of potential effects at a number of different levels. One Page 6 Risk & Policy Analysts/Metroeconomica of the tools commonly used for this purpose is that of social CBA, which is aimed at determining whether or not the benefits of introducing a policy outweigh its costs. In its fullest sense, it requires the assessment of all the effects of a policy, whether positive or negative and, through the use of market data or specialist valuation techniques, the expression of these effects in a common unit, typically money, to facilitate comparison. The use of CBA is not without its criticisms, however. The first, and often repeated criticism, concerns the need to convert all information on costs and benefits to a monetary value.
Recommended publications
  • The National Income Multiplier: Its Theory Its Philosophy Its Utility
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1959 The national income multiplier: Its theory its philosophy its utility John Colin Jones The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Jones, John Colin, "The national income multiplier: Its theory its philosophy its utility" (1959). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 8768. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/8768 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE NATIOHAL INCOME MULTIPLIER; ITS THEORY, ITS PHILOSOPHY, ITS UTILITY J» COLIN H. JONES B.A. University of WaJes^ U.C.W., Aberystwyth, 195Ô Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY 1959 Approved by: , Board of Examiners Dean, Graduate School AUG 6 1959 D a te UMI Number: EP39569 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI Dis»art«t)on Publishsng UMI EP39569 Published by ProQuest LLC (2013).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Concept of Nudging: Its Coherence and Applicability?
    On the Concept of Nudging: Its Coherence and Applicability? Mads Wistrup Freund September 15, 2017 25-June-1993-xxxx MSc in Business Administration and Philosophy Vejleder: Marius Gudman Høyer 1 Abstract The practice of nudging has attracted attention from researchers, policymakers, and practitioners alike. The contemporary interest in nudging has sparked demands for a clearer examination of the conditions under which nudging and other behavioral methods can be used efficiently and acceptable. There are several unresolved questions which may have contributed to heated political and scientific discussions, especially heated is the ethical discussion of applying nudging in the public policy domain. This thesis concentrate on the philosophical premises nudges are built on. It is argued that the model is philosophically problematic. Different interventions might operate through various logics that threaten not only effectiveness but also representativeness and ethical ends. This thesis aruges that the next step in advancing the acceptability nudging requires a clarification. The thesis investi- gates the internal logic of this practice by exploring the expositions and implications within the literature on nudging in public policy, by specifically exploring its origins in behavioral economics; its impact on welfare policy; and ethical implications. This analysis is guided by Foucaults concept of veridiction and understanding of power. This thesis concludes that nudging would be more acceptable if it clarified that humans, in these models, are treated as defective econs. Choice architects are trying to represent the complex reality of hu- man judgment and decision-making with the inclusion of psychology in a highly simplified normative modeling framework, to increase individuals tendency to act according to neo- classical rational choice models.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Income and the Debt Position of Households Propagate Public Into Private Spending?
    University of Heidelberg Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series No. 676 How Do Income and the Debt Position of Households Propagate Public into Private Spending? Sebastian K. Rüth and Camilla Simon February 2020 How Do Income and the Debt Position of Households Propagate Public into Private Spending? Sebastian K. R¨uth Camilla Simon∗ February 21, 2020 Abstract We study the household sector's post-tax income and debt position as prop- agation mechanisms of public into private spending, in postwar U.S. data. In structural VARs, we obtain the consumption \crowding-in puzzle" for surges in public spending and show this consumption response to be accompanied by a persistent increase in disposable income. Endogenously reacting income, however, is insufficient to rationalize conditional comovement of private and public spending: once we hypothetically force (dis)aggregate measures of in- come to their pre-shock paths, consumption still rises. Corroborating these findings within an external-instruments-identified VAR, which constitutes an adequate laboratory for the simultaneous interplay of financial and macroe- conomic time-series, we provide causal evidence of fiscal stimulus prompting households to take on more credit. This favorable debt cycle is paralleled by dropping interest rates, narrowing credit spreads, and inflating collat- eral prices, e.g., real estate prices, suggesting that softening borrowing con- straints support the accumulation of debt and help rationalizing the absence of crowding-out. Keywords: Government spending shock, household income, household in- debtedness, credit spread, external instrument, fiscal foresight. JEL codes: E30, E62, G51, H31. ∗Respectively: Heidelberg University, Alfred-Weber-Institute for Economics, phone: +49 6221 54 2943, e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author); University of W¨urzburg,Department of Economics, phone: +49 931 31 85036, e-mail: camilla.simon@uni- wuerzburg.de.
    [Show full text]
  • The Macroeconomic Implications of Consumption: State-Of-Art and Prospects for the Heterodox Future Research
    The macroeconomic implications of consumption: state-of-art and prospects for the heterodox future research Lídia Brochier1 and Antonio Carlos Macedo e Silva2 Abstract The recent US economic scenario has motivated a series of heterodox papers concerned with household indebtedness and consumption. Though discussing autonomous consumption, most of the theoretical papers rely on private investment-led growth models. An alternative approach is the so-called Sraffian supermultipler model, which treats long-run investment as induced, allowing for the possibility that other final demand components – including consumption – may lead long-run growth. We suggest that the dialogue between these approaches is not only possible but may prove to be quite fruitful. Keywords: Consumption, household debt, growth theories, autonomous expenditure. JEL classification: B59, E12, E21. 1 PhD Student, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), São Paulo, Brazil. [email protected] 2 Professor at University of Campinas (UNICAMP), São Paulo, Brazil. [email protected] 1 1 Introduction Following Keynes’ famous dictum on investment as the “causa causans” of output and employment levels, macroeconomic literature has tended to depict personal consumption as a well-behaved and rather uninteresting aggregate demand component.3 To be sure, consumption is much less volatile than investment. Does it really mean it is less important? For many Keynesian economists, the answer is – or at least was, until recently – probably positive. At any rate, the American experience has at least demonstrated that consumption is important, and not only because it usually represents more than 60% of GDP. After all, in the U.S., the very ratio between consumption and GDP has been increasing since the 1980s, in spite of the stagnant real labor income and the growing income inequality.
    [Show full text]
  • Macro Model Objectives : Understand the Difference Between Desired
    Macro Model Objectives : Understand the difference between desired expenditure and actual expenditure. Explain the determinants of desired consumption and desired investment expeditures. Understand the meaning of equilibrium national income. Recognize the difference between movements along and shifts of the aggregate expenditure functions. Desired expenditure Everyone makes expenditure decisions. Fortunately, it is unnecessary for our purposes to look at each of the millions of such individual decisions. Instead, it is sufficient to consider four main groups of decision makers. The sum of their desired expenditures on domestically produced output is called desired aggregate expenditure, or more simply aggregate expenditure (AE). AE = C + I +G +(X-M) Autonomus versus induced expenditure. Components of aggregate expenditure that do not depend on national income are called autonomous expenditures. Components of aggregate expenditure that do change in response to changes in national income are called induced expenditures. Global Economics : macro model 2 Important simplifications Our goal is to develop the simplest possible model of national-income determination. To do so we focus on only two of the four components of desired aggregate expenditure. Consumption and investment Desired consumption expenditure By definition, there are only two possible uses of disposable income–consumption and saving. W hen the household decides how much to put to one use, it has automatically decided how much to put to the other use. The consumption function relates to total desired consumption expenditures of all households. The consumption behaviour of households depends on the income that they actually have to spend, which is called disposable income. Under the assumptions, here, there are no governments, therefore no taxes.
    [Show full text]
  • 10Expenditure Multipliers*
    Chapter EXPENDITURE 10 MULTIPLIERS* Key Concepts FIGURE 10.1 The Consumption Function Fixed Prices and Expenditure Plans1 5 In the very short run, firms do not change their prices and they sell the amount that is demanded. As a result: 4 ♦ The price level is fixed. ♦ GDP is determined by aggregate demand. 3 Aggregate planned expenditure is the sum of planned consumption expenditure, planned investment, planned Consumption 2 function government purchases, and planned exports minus planned imports. GDP and aggregate planned expenditures have a two- 1 way link: An increase in real GDP increases aggregate planned expenditures, and an increase in aggregate expenditures increases real GDP. 123 45 Consumption expenditure (trillions of 1996 dollars) Consumption expenditure, C, and saving, S, depend on Disposable income (trillions of 1996 dollars) disposable income (disposable income, YD, is income minus taxes plus transfer payments), the real interest ♦ The slope of the consumption function equals the rate, wealth, and expected future income. MPC. The slope of the U.S. consumption function The consumption function is the relationship between is about 0.9. consumption expenditure and disposable income. Fig- ♦ Changes in the real interest rate, wealth, or expected ure 10.1 illustrates a consumption function. future income shift the consumption function. ♦ The amount of consumption when disposable in- Consumption varies when real GDP changes because come is zero ($1 trillion in Figure 10.1) is called changes in real GDP change disposable income. autonomous consumption. Consumption above this The saving function is the relationship between saving amount is called induced consumption. and disposable income. The marginal propensity to ♦ The marginal propensity to consume,,, MPC,,, is save, MPS,,, is the fraction of a change in disposable the fraction of a change in disposable income that is ∆S income that is saved, or MPS = .
    [Show full text]
  • The Wealth Effect in Empirical Life-Cycle Aggregate Consumption Equations
    The Wealth Effect in Empirical Life-Cycle Aggregate Consumption Equations Yash P. Mehra his article presents an empirical model of U.S. consumer spending that relates consumption to labor income and household wealth. This specification is consistent with the life-cycle hypothesis of saving first T 1 popularized in the 1960s by Ando, Modigliani, and their cohorts. My anal- ysis here extends the previous research in several directions. First, I examine the dynamic relationship between consumption, income, and wealth using cointegration and error correction methodology. In previous research, the tra- ditional life-cycle model has often been examined using either levels or first differences of these variables. While the use of differences does avoid the pitfall of spurious correlation due to common trending series, it tends to lead to the omission of the long-run equilibrium (cointegrating) relationships that may exist among levels of these variables. In fact, Gali (1990) goes so far as to present a theoretical life-cycle model that generates a common trend in aggregate consumption, labor income, and wealth. Therefore, my empirical work here tests for the presence of a long-run equilibrium (cointegrating) rela- tionship between the level of aggregate consumer spending and its economic determinants such as labor income and wealth. I then examine the short-run dynamic relationship among these variables using an error correction specifi- cation proposed in Davidson et al. (1978). The present article investigates whether wealth has predictive content for future consumption. If it does, then changes in wealth may lead to changes in The author wishes to thank Huberto Ennis, Pierre Sarte, and Roy Webb for many useful suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aggregate Expenditure Model a Stylized Look at Business Cycle Dynamics
    The Aggregate Expenditure Model A Stylized Look at Business Cycle Dynamics Elements of Macroeconomics ▪ Johns Hopkins University Outline 1. The Aggregate Expenditure Model 2. An Expanded Aggregate Expenditure Model 3. The Multiplier Effect • Textbook Readings: Ch. 12 Elements of Macroeconomics ▪ Johns Hopkins University From Macro Variables to (Short-Run) Macro Models • The first of three models - The Aggregate Expenditure Model § Solely output variables are in this model • Next class: Aggregate Demand - Aggregate Supply Model § Both output and prices are in this model • Later: Expanded Loanable Funds Model (Monetary Policy) § Output, prices and financial markets are in this model Elements of Macroeconomics ▪ Johns Hopkins University A Quick Review • We have measurements GDP = C + I + G + NX § Consumption: Households purchases of goods and services § Investment: Housing, business investment in equipment, software, buildings plus inventories § Government spending: defense, infrastructure, social security, … § Net exports: Exports minus imports • We need a model § What forces drive the overall economy? Elements of Macroeconomics ▪ Johns Hopkins University What Are We Looking For With This Model? • We acknowledge that boom/bust cycles are regular occurrences • Periodically, we see big imbalances § Millions want jobs, but can’t find them ➞ Unemployment jumps § Millions want to drive cars and trucks ➞ Gasoline prices soar and inflation jumps • We want a model that identifies equilibrium, BUT ALLOWS FOR IMBALANCES Elements of Macroeconomics
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of MACROECONOMICS an Open Text by Douglas Curtis and Ian Irvine
    with Open Texts Principles of MACROECONOMICS an Open Text by Douglas Curtis and Ian Irvine VERSION 2017 – REVISION B ADAPTABLE | ACCESSIBLE | AFFORDABLE Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC-SA) advancing learning Champions of Access to Knowledge OPEN TEXT ONLINE ASSESSMENT All digital forms of access to our high- We have been developing superior on- quality open texts are entirely FREE! All line formative assessment for more than content is reviewed for excellence and is 15 years. Our questions are continuously wholly adaptable; custom editions are pro- adapted with the content and reviewed for duced by Lyryx for those adopting Lyryx as- quality and sound pedagogy. To enhance sessment. Access to the original source files learning, students receive immediate per- is also open to anyone! sonalized feedback. Student grade reports and performance statistics are also provided. SUPPORT INSTRUCTOR SUPPLEMENTS Access to our in-house support team is avail- Additional instructor resources are also able 7 days/week to provide prompt resolu- freely accessible. Product dependent, these tion to both student and instructor inquiries. supplements include: full sets of adaptable In addition, we work one-on-one with in- slides and lecture notes, solutions manuals, structors to provide a comprehensive sys- and multiple choice question banks with an tem, customized for their course. This can exam building tool. include adapting the text, managing multi- ple sections, and more! Contact Lyryx Today! [email protected] advancing learning Principles of Macroeconomics an Open Text by Douglas Curtis and Ian Irvine Version 2017 — Revision B BE A CHAMPION OF OER! Contribute suggestions for improvements, new content, or errata: A new topic A new example An interesting new question Any other suggestions to improve the material Contact Lyryx at [email protected] with your ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIT III Consumption Function the Consumption Function Is an Economic Formula That Directly Connects Total Consumption and Gross National Income
    UNIT III Consumption Function The consumption function is an economic formula that directly connects total consumption and gross national income. The function introduced by British economist John Maynard Keynes indicates the relationship between income and expenditure and the proportion of income spent on goods. Explanation It indicates that consumer spending is determined by the amount of income and the rate of increase or decrease of income. This concept, in the long run, is not stable because the income changes and consumption pattern changes. Here this function to be assumed as stable and expenditures determined the level of income. For valid concept long run it has to stable to reach equilibrium. Consumption Function Formula Below is the equation of consumption function. C = c + bY C – Total Consumption c – Autonomous Consumption (minimum consumption for survival when income is zero). Autonomous consumption is not influenced by income – Here we have to understand that consumption can never be zero and if income becomes zero there is minimum consumption which never is nullified. Such consumption is called autonomous consumption. If income is low there is a minimum level of expenditure which is higher than the income. In such a case, consumption has to be maintained irrespective of the level of income. The minimum level of consumption is known as autonomous consumption. Induced consumption (bY) (influenced by income) – bY; b is the marginal propensity to consume (which means consumption level increased for every rupee increase in the income). Induced consumption influenced by income. Y clearly indicates i.e income. Break-even Point – When consumption expenditure reaches the income if there is no concept of saving it is called the break-even point stage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Macroeconomic Implications of Consumption: State-Of-Art and Prospects for the Heterodox Future Research
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive The Macroeconomic Implications of Consumption: State-of-Art and Prospects for the Heterodox Future Research Brochier, Lidia and Macedo e Silva, Antonio Carlos University of Campinas July 2017 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/92672/ MPRA Paper No. 92672, posted 21 Mar 2019 09:38 UTC The Macroeconomic Implications of Consumption: State-of-Art and Prospects for the Heterodox Future Research As Implicações Macroeconômicas do Consumo: Perspectivas para a Pesquisa Heterodoxa Lídia Brochier* Antonio Carlos Macedo e Silva** Abstract: The recent US economic scenario has motivated a series of heterodox papers concerned with household indebtedness and consumption. Though discussing autonomous consumption, most of the theoretical papers rely on private investment- led growth models. An alternative approach is the so-called Sraffian supermultipler model, which treats long-run investment as induced, allowing for the possibility that other final demand components – including consumption – may lead long-run growth. We suggest that the dialogue between these approaches is not only possible but may prove to be quite fruitful. Keywords: Consumption. Household debt. Growth theories. Autonomous expenditures. Resumo: O cenário econômico recente dos Estados Unidos motivou uma série de artigos de cunho heterodoxo preocupados com o endividamento das famílias e com o consumo. Apesar de discutirem o consumo autônomo, a maioria dos artigos teóricos se baseia em modelos de crescimento liderado pelo investimento privado. Uma abordagem alternativa é a do chamado supermultiplicador “sraffiano”, que aborda o investimento de longo prazo como induzido, permitindo que outros componentes da demanda final – incluindo o consumo – possam assumir a liderança do crescimento de longo prazo.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Control in Consumer Choice
    Working Papers R & D SELF-RATIONING: SELF-CONTROL IN CONSUMER CHOICE by K. WERTENBROCH* 2001/63/MKT * Associate Professor of Marketing at INSEAD Boulevard de Constance, 77305 Fontainebleau Cedex, France. A working paper in the INSEAD Working Paper Series is intended as a means whereby a faculty researcher's thoughts and findings may be communicated to interested readers. The paper should be considered preliminary in nature and may require revision. Printed at INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France. Self-Rationing: Self-Control in Consumer Choice1 Klaus Wertenbroch2 Department of Marketing INSEAD September 2001 1 Many thanks to George Loewenstein and Daniel Read for their invaluable comments, from which this paper has greatly benefited. All remaining errors, omissions, and dynamic inconsistencies are the author’s. 2 Klaus Wertenbroch is Associate Professor of Marketing, INSEAD, Boulevard de Constance, 77305 Fontainebleau Cedex, France. Voice: (33)(0) 1-6071-2651, fax: (33)(1) 6074-6197, email: [email protected]. Self-Rationing Self-Rationing: Self-Control in Consumer Choice Betcha can’t eat just one. Bert Lahr, advertising Lay’s Potato Chips (1963) I. Introduction: Global versus Local Constraints in Consumer Choice Many consumer decisions are repeated purchase and consumption choices that are all subject to the same global normative constraint, for instance, the consumer’s lifetime budget constraint in a purchase decision, her expected life expectancy in a time allocation decision, or her weekly grocery inventory in deciding what to cook for dinner. To illustrate, Ando and Modigliani’s (1963) life-cycle hypothesis of saving assumes that consumers maximize utility subject to their available resources, which are expressed as the sum of their current and discounted future earnings plus their current wealth.
    [Show full text]