Gomba District
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Local Government Performance Assessment Gomba District (Vote Code: 591) Assessment Scores Accountability Requirements 67% Crosscutting Performance Measures 70% Educational Performance Measures 56% Health Performance Measures 75% Water Performance Measures 75% 591 Gomba District Accontability Requirements 2018 Compliance Summary of requirements Definition of compliance Compliant? justification Annual performance contract Yes LG has submitted an annual • From MoFPED’s Gomba District Local performance contract of the forthcoming inventory/schedule of LG Government submitted year by June 30 on the basis of the submissions of the annual PFMAA and LG Budget guidelines for performance contracts, performance contract the coming financial year. check dates of submission on 21st July 2018. This and issuance of receipts is within the adjusted and: deadline of 1st August 2018. Therefore the o If LG submitted before LG is compliant. or by due date, then state ‘compliant’ o If LG had not submitted or submitted later than the due date, state ‘non- compliant’ • From the Uganda budget website: www.budget.go.ug, check and compare recorded date therein with date of LG submission to confirm. Supporting Documents for the Budget required as per the PFMA are submitted and available Yes LG has submitted a Budget that • From MoFPED’s The Local Government includes a Procurement Plan for the inventory of LG budget submitted the budget forthcoming FY by 30th June (LG PPDA submissions, check together with the Regulations, 2006). whether: Procurement Plan on 21st July 2018. This is o The LG budget is within the adjusted accompanied by a deadline of 1st August Procurement Plan or not. 2018. Therefore the If a LG submission LG is Compliant. includes a Procurement Plan, the LG is compliant; otherwise it is not compliant. Reporting: submission of annual and quarterly budget performance reports No LG has submitted the annual From MoFPED’s official The annual performance report for the previous FY record/inventory of LG performance report for on or before 31st July (as per LG submission of annual the previous year was Budget Preparation Guidelines for performance report submitted on 28th coming FY; PFMA Act, 2015) submitted to MoFPED, August 2018 beyond check the date MoFPED the deadline of 31st received the annual July 2018; hence the performance report: LG is NOT compliant. • If LG submitted report to MoFPED in time, then it is compliant • If LG submitted late or did not submit, then it is not compliant No LG has submitted the quarterly budget From MoFPED’s official The Local Government performance report for all the four record/ inventory of LG submitted quarterly quarters of the previous FY by end of submission of quarterly and annual reports as the FY; PFMA Act, 2015). reports submitted to follows: Quarter 1 on MoFPED, check the date 7th December 2017; MoFPED received the Quarter 2 on 12th quarterly performance March 2018; Quarter 3 reports: on 30th May 2018 and Quarter 4 on 28th • If LG submitted all four August 2018. reports to MoFPED of the previous FY by July 31, The LG submitted the then it is compliant (timely 4th quarterly report submission of each (annual performance quarterly report, is not an report) on 28th August accountability 2018. This is beyond requirement, but by end of the July 31st deadline the FY, all quarterly hence the LG is NOT reports should be compliant. available). • If LG submitted late or did not submit at all, then it is not compliant. Audit Yes The LG has provided information to the From MoFPED’s The LG submitted audit PS/ST on the status of implementation Inventory/record of LG responses to the of Internal Auditor General and the submissions of statements Permanent Secretary/ Auditor General’s findings for the entitled “Actions to Secretary to Treasury previous financial year by end of Address Internal Auditor on 26/3/2018 with February (PFMA s. 11 2g). This General’s findings”, cover letter dated statement includes actions against all 22/3/2018 referenced find- ings where the Internal Audi- tor Check: CR/D/212/01 signed by and the Auditor General recommended the Chief • If LG submitted a the Accounting Officer to take action in Administrative Officer, ‘Response’ (and provide lines with applicable laws. Mr. Yiga Mukasa. details), then it is compliant • If LG did not submit a’ response’, then it is non- compliant • If there is a response for all –LG is compliant • If there are partial or not all issues responded to – LG is not compliant. Yes The audit opinion of LG Financial Gomba DLG got a Statement (issued in January) is not clean (unqualified) adverse or disclaimer. audit opinion from the Auditor General for the financial year 2017/18. 591 Gomba Crosscutting District Performance Measures 2018 Summary of Definition of Compliance justification Score requirements compliance Planning, budgeting and execution 1 All new Evidence that a Gomba District LG has a functional Physical Planning infrastructure district/ municipality Committee that considers new investments on time. This was projects in: (i) a has: confirmed by minutes of meetings dated 22/11/2017 under municipality / Min.04/DPPC/11/2017: Report from the Physical Planner (ii) in a district • A functional informing members that the unit has so far served 51 notices are approved Physical Planning to illegal developers in Mpenja and Maddu Sub County; and by the Committee in place that there is need for their office to carry out routine respective that considers new inspection on weekly basis to curb illegal developments; and Physical investments on under Min.05/DPPC/11/2017: Matters Arising and Resolution Planning time: score 1. (1) All growth centers to have physical development plans. Committees These include: Kiriri, Ngeye, Ngomanene, Luzira, Maseruka, and are and Nsambwe among others. Minutes dated 18th July 2017 consistent with under Min.06/DPPC/07/2017: Matters Arising under item of the approved Resolutions; that the Physical Planner to ensure that the Physical Plans Physical Planning Act is implemented. Maximum 4 There is evidence that the Physical Planning Committee is points for this fully constituted as per the list of appointees on the performance appointment letter availed, dated 08st August 2018 under measure. reference CR/D/213/01. 1 All new • Evidence that The LG submitted four (4) sets of minutes to the MoLHUD on infrastructure district/ MLG has 5th March 2018 under reference CR/D/218/01. The minutes projects in: (i) a submitted at least 4 submitted are dated as 22nd November 2017; 18th July municipality / sets of minutes of 2018; 16th May 2018 and 28th February 2018. (ii) in a district Physical Planning are approved Committee to the by the MoLHUD score 1. respective Physical Planning Committees and are consistent with the approved Physical Plans Maximum 4 points for this performance measure. 0 All new • All infrastructure There is no physical development plan in place to guide infrastructure investments are infrastructure investments. projects in: (i) a consistent with the municipality / approved Physical (ii) in a district Development Plan: are approved score 1 or else 0 by the respective Physical Planning Committees and are consistent with the approved Physical Plans Maximum 4 points for this performance measure. 0 All new • Action area plan The LG does not have an Action Area Plan in place. infrastructure prepared for the projects in: (i) a previous FY: score municipality / 1 or else 0 (ii) in a district are approved by the respective Physical Planning Committees and are consistent with the approved Physical Plans Maximum 4 points for this performance measure. 2 The prioritized • Evidence that There was evidence that the Priorities in AWP are based on investment priorities in AWP for outcomes of the budget conference dated 07/11/2017 and activities in the the current FY are discussed in TPC on 18th December 2017 under Min. approved AWP based on the DTPC/04/12/17: Presentation and discussion of the Budget for the current outcomes of budget conference report. FY are derived conferences: score from the 2. The priorities in the AWP for the current FY include: approved five- - Education: Construction of a 2 classroom block at Kanoni year UMEA Primary School (pg. 14 on AWP and pg. 10 on the development Budget conference report); plan, are - Works: Phased Construction and completion of district based on headquarters and payment of outstanding obligations (pg. 70 discussions in on AWP and pg. 6 on the Budget conference report); annual reviews and - Water: Construction of production water source (boreholes) at Buyanja (pg. 76 on AWP and pg. 5 on the Budget budget conference report); conferences and - Water: Construction of an ion remover at Bunoni-Kyegonza Sub County (pg. 76 on AWP and pg. 5 on the Budget have project conference report); profiles - Water: Construction and installation of solar powered mini Maximum 5 water supply system at Kyayi and Kawuula (pg. 76 on AWP points on this and pg. 5 on the Budget conference report); performance measure. - Works: Annual routine maintenance of district roads (323km) using road gangs (pg. 69 on AWP and pg. 6 on the Budget conference report); - Works: Mechanized routine maintenance of roads 90.5km (pg. 69 on AWP and pg. 6 on the Budget conference report); and - Administration: Procurement of office furniture, 2 laptop computers, and filing cabins for the registry (pg. 28 on AWP and Annex 2 on the Budget conference report) among others. 1 The prioritized • Evidence that the There was evidence that the capital investments in the AWP investment capital investments for the current FY are derived from the approved Five year activities in the in the approved development plan. The capital investments in the AWP approved AWP Annual work plan include: for the current for the current FY are derived - Works: Phased Construction and completion of district from the FY are derived from headquarters and payment of outstanding obligations (pg.