DOCSLIB.ORG

OEA/Ser.L/V/II.84 Doc. 39 Rev. 14 October 1993 Original: Spanish

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OEA/Ser.L/V/II.84 Doc. 39 Rev. 14 October 1993 Original: Spanish OEA/Ser.L/V/II.84 Doc. 39 rev. 14 October 1993 Original: Spanish SECOND REPORT ON THE SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN COLOMBIA TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION CHAPTER I THE ON‐SITE VISITS OF THE IACHR TO COLOMBIA 1990‐1992 CHAPTER II THE VIOLENCE PHENOMENON CHAPTER III THE POLITICAL AND LEGAL SYSTEM IN COLOMBIA CHAPTER IV THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL CHAPTER V RIGHT TO PERSONAL LIBERTY CHAPTER VI THE RIGHT TO PERSONAL SECURITY AND HUMANE TREATMENT CHAPTER VII THE RIGHT TO LIFE CHAPTER VIII THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION AND TO FORM AND JOIN UNION CHAPTER IX FREEDOM OF THOUGHT AND EXPRESSION HOW THE ACTIVITIES OF IRREGULAR ARMED GROUPS AFFECT HUMAN RIG CHAPTER X IN COLOMBIA CHAPTER XI THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLE IN COLOMBIA CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c3151a/ RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SECOND SPECIAL REPORT ON THE SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN COLOMBIA WHEREAS: At its 78th session, held in Washington, D.C., September 24 through October 5, 1990, the Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights considered the invitation that the Government of Colombia had extended in response to a request from the Commission to conduct an on‐site visit to observe and investigate the human rights situation in that country; At that session, the Commission designated a Special Committee to make a preparatory visit, which visit occurred in the first week of December 1990; by mutual agreement with the Colombian Government, that preparatory visit was followed by a second on‐site visit in May 1992; The reports that the Special Committees produced as a result of those visits were presented to the full membership of the Commission at its 83rd session; after examining the reports, the Commission approved the Second Special Report on the Situation of Human Rights in Colombia at its meeting of March 12, 1993, which was then sent to the Government on April 30, 1993, so that it might make whatever comments it deemed pertinent; By a note dated August 3, 1993, the Government of Colombia sent the Commission its observations and comments on the report; During the 84th session, held in October 1993, the Commission examined the Colombian Government's observations and comments on the Special Report on the Situation of Human Rights in Colombia, in order to decide whether to publish the report, and The formalities required under Chapter V, Article 62 of the Commission's Regulations concerning preparation, processing and publication of special reports have been discharged, THE INTER‐AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS RESOLVES: 1. To approve the Second Special Report on the Situation of Human Rights in Colombia, OEA/Ser.L/V/II.84, doc. 39, October 14, 1993. 2. To publish the above‐entitled report. 3. To report this decision to the Government of Colombia. 2 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c3151a/ CHAPTER I THE ON‐SITE VISITS OF THE IACHR TO COLOMBIA 1990‐1992 A. VISIT BY THE SPECIAL PREPARATORY COMMISSION, DECEMBER 1990 Subsequent to the on‐site visit made in 1980, the Commission never again had an opportunity to return to Colombia. As an international body it must have either an invitation or permission, and it had neither until 1991. Nevertheless, it has been vigilant in its observation of and concern for the human rights problem in Colombia. On April 13, 1989, during the Commission's 75th session, the Government of Colombia, under the administration of President Barco, invited the Commission to visit Colombian territory to observe the general human rights situation in the country. On April 25, 1989, the Commission, through its Executive Secretariat, sent the Government of Colombia its reply proposing October of that year as the date for the on‐site visit. Later, on July 10, 1989, the Colombian Government informed the Commission that while its invitation was still open, it would prefer that the Commission consider a visit sometime in the first quarter of 1990, citing as its reasons, inter alia, the peace negotiations with the M‐19 movement and the start of the sessions of the National Congress that would debate the constitutional amendment. This communication was brought to the Commission's attention during its 76th session. There, the Commission members agreed to change the date of the visit and to suggest March 1990 as a suitable date for the on‐site visit. In answer to that suggestion, on December 15, 1989, the Colombian Government told the Commission that general elections for the deliberative bodies were scheduled for March 1990 and the presidential elections for May. Given that fact, the Government felt that it might be best to consider some other date. This message was conveyed to the Commission during its 77th session in May 1990. It decided to discuss this topic again at its next session in September of that year. Given the very serious human rights situation in Colombia and the fact that though the invitation was still open the Government, citing a variety of reasons, had not yet specified a date, the Commission decided as follows: To propose to the Colombian Government that the on‐site visit be conducted in March 1991 and that at the end of that visit a special report be prepared. Should the Government disagree with the suggested date or fail to set an alternative date immediately, the Secretariat would, using the information it had at hand, prepare a report to be examined at the 79th session of the Commission; once that report was approved, it would be added to the Annual Report to be submitted to the General Assembly of the Organization. 3 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c3151a/ When the Commission met again for its 78th session, September 24 through October 5, 1990, it considered the standing but not yet finalized invitation from the Colombian Government to make an on‐site visit to the country and suggested that the Government's permission be requested to send a special preliminary and exploratory mission composed of one member of the Commission, accompanied by staff of the Executive Secretariat, to establish direct contact with some government and justice officials and nongovernmental human rights institutions in Colombia. Duly informed of that decision, the Government of Colombia said that it would be pleased to receive the IACHR's preliminary special mission, scheduled for the first week in December 1990. In effect, the Commission's special preparatory visit took place from December 3 through 7, 1990. It consisted of the Chairman of the Commission, Dr. Leo Valladares Lanza, Deputy Executive Secretary David Padilla, and the Secretariat attorney in charge of Colombian matters, Manuel Velasco Clark. The latter had traveled to Colombia some days in advance to make the necessary arrangements for the visit. a. Aspects taken into account during the Special Preparatory Commission's visit With the problems of obtaining an invitation from the Colombian Government behind it, the Special Preparatory Commission knew that the success of its efforts could depend on the recommendations it made to the new Colombian Government regarding fulfillment of its international commitments, in order to secure specific measures to protect human rights. It also intended to learn what measures government officials were considering to improve the existing situation and what the NGOs thought of this issue, of the present situation and of the cases before the Commission. At the time of this preliminary visit, Colombia was enmeshed in a complex crisis, much of it caused by the many violent elements and causes of violence within Colombia. Impunity was also a problem, and was the result of an ineffectual judicial system. While the major cause of the impunity problem were the threats and intimidation that these violent elements targeted at the members of the judiciary, there were other causes as well: the judiciary did not have sufficient resources and lacked properly trained personnel; there were no guarantees for magistrates and their families; no sweeping, in‐depth reform was undertaken to make investigations rapid, effective, and impartial and to punish the guilty. Another potential source of human rights violations and a reason why crime went unpunished were the military courts, which State security agents used to keep those who participated in criminal acts from being prosecuted by the regular courts. Finally, the Special Preparatory Committee wanted to apprise itself fully of the special laws that took effect in a state of emergency. This system of laws, which had become much broader, appeared to be causing and in many cases even legitimizing many abuses. Apart from examining the situation of human rights in Colombia and conveying to the Government its serious concern over the existing situation, the Special Preparatory Commission also planned to request information and practical findings on certain cases that were being processed with the Commission and to fill in gaps in the information that the Executive Secretariat of the Commission in Washington had in its possession. 4 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c3151a/ The Special Preparatory Commission was also conscious of the special situation in Colombia at the time: the latter was in the process of amending its constitution and installing a constitutional assembly in which various sectors of society participated. This was an opportunity for the Committee to give the Government of President Gaviria some substantive suggestions, as he had repeatedly stated his commitment to the human rights cause. b. Activities of the Special Preparatory Commission of the IACHR in December 1990 During its visit to Colombia, the IACHR's special delegation had a heavy program that included interviews, audiences and working meetings with Colombia's leading public officials, representatives of nongovernmental human rights organizations, representatives of petitioners in individual cases and plaintiffs in cases with the IACHR, representatives of various sectors of Colombian society, journalists, those sectors of the church involved with programs to protect and defend human rights and representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PARAMILITARIES Kill Suspected Supporters of the FARC
    UniTeD SelF-DeFenSe FoRCeS oF ColoMBiA (AUC) PARAMiliTARY TRooPS, lA GABARRA, noRTe De SAnTAnDeR, DeCeMBeR 10, 2004 PARAMiliTARieS kill suspected supporters of the FARC. By 1983, locals reported DEATh TO KIDNAPPERs cases of army troops and MAS fighters working together to assas- sinate civilians and burn farms.5 After the 1959 Cuban revolution, the U.S. became alarmed power and wealth, to the point that by 2004 the autodefensas had this model of counterinsurgency proved attractive to the Colom- that Marxist revolts would break out elsewhere in latin Ameri- taken over much of the country. bian state. on a 1985 visit to Puerto Boyacá, President Belisario Be- ca. in 1962, an Army special warfare team arrived in Colombia to As they expanded their control across Colombia, paramil- tancur reportedly declared, “every inhabitant of Magdalena Medio help design a counterinsurgency strategy for the Colombian armed itary militias forcibly displaced over a million persons from the has risen up to become a defender of peace, next to our army, next to forces. even though the FARC and other insurgent groups had not land.3 By official numbers, as of 2011, the autodefensas are estimat- our police… Continue on, people of Puerto Boyacá!”6 yet appeared on the scene, U.S. advisers recommended that a force ed to have killed at least 140,000 civilians including hundreds of Soon, landowners, drug traffickers, and security forces set made up of civilians be used “to perform counteragent and coun- trade unionists, teachers, human rights defenders, rural organiz- up local autodefensas across Colombia. in 1987, the Minister of terpropaganda functions and, as necessary, execute paramilitary, ers, politicians, and journalists who they labelled as sympathetic government César gaviria testified to the existence of 140 ac- sabotage, and/or terrorist activities against known communist pro- to the guerrillas.3 tive right-wing militias in the country.7 Many sported macabre ponents.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-GOVERNMENTAL TERRORISM in LATIN AMERICA SINCE the END of the Cold WAR*
    A SHIFT IN THE p ARADIGM OF VIOLENCE: NoN-GOVERNMENTAL TERRORISM IN LATIN AMERICA SINCE THE END OF THE CoLD WAR* ANDREAS FELDMANN INSTITUTO DE CIENCIA POLÍTICA, PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE, CHILE Resumen Desde mediados de_ los años noventa el terrorismo no-gubernamental ha aumentado de forma significa­ tiva en muchas regiones del mundo. En América Latina, sin embargo, un área donde históricamente gru?_os radicales de izquierda y derecha recurrieron a prácticas terroristas para conseguir sus objetivos poht1cos, el terrorismo como fenómeno ha disminuido notablemente. Basado en el influyente trabajo de T1mothy W1ckham-Crowley, este artículo sostiene que la disminución del uso del terror en América Latina corr_esponde a un cambio en los "repertorios culturales" de grupos revolucionarios y otros grupos anti­ s1st_em1cos. El trabajo arguye que este cambio deriva de tres factores: las traumáticas experiencias derivadas de la represión brutal de la que fueron objeto muchos de estos grupos, un creciente pragmatismo Y la valoración del juego democrático; y el rechazo por parte de la gran mayoría de la población en la región del uso de la violencia como método político. En este sentido, los grupos que bregan por promover cambios sociales han internalizado que el terror constituye una estrategia contraproducente e ilegítima. El artículo sostiene que Colombia constituye una excepción a esta tendencia. En el caso colombiano, se argumenta, el terror deriva de la lógica perversa del conflicto armado, donde los actores deliberadamen­ te victimizan a los civiles para alcanzar objetivos militares y políticos a través del terror. Abstract While non-state terrorism has grown substantially in many parts of the world since the mid 1990s in Latin Revista de Ciencia Política es una publicación bi-anual del Instituto de Ciencia Política de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de America, the insurgent continent par excellence, where radical non-state actors at both end~ of the Chile.
    [Show full text]
  • FARC-EP) Marxist-Leninist Insurgency Or Criminal Enterprise?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2005-12 The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia - People's Army (FARC-EP) Marxist-Leninist insurgency or criminal enterprise? Saskiewicz, Paul E. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1809 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS THE REVOLUTIONARY ARMED FORCES OF COLOMBIA – PEOPLE’S ARMY (FARC-EP): MARXIST-LENINIST INSURGENCY OR CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE? by Paul E. Saskiewicz December 2005 Thesis Advisor: Jeanne Giraldo Co-Advisor: Douglas Porch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 2005 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE: The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia – People’s Army (FARC- 5. FUNDING NUMBERS EP): Marxist-Leninist Insurgency or Criminal Enterprise? 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Listing Five Foreign Bird Species in Colombia and Ecuador, South America, As Endangered Throughout Their Range; Final Rule
    Vol. 78 Tuesday, No. 209 October 29, 2013 Part IV Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing Five Foreign Bird Species in Colombia and Ecuador, South America, as Endangered Throughout Their Range; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:44 Oct 28, 2013 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\29OCR4.SGM 29OCR4 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES4 64692 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR endangered or threatened we are proposed for these five foreign bird required to publish in the Federal species as endangered, following careful Fish and Wildlife Service Register a proposed rule to list the consideration of all comments we species and, within 1 year of received during the public comment 50 CFR Part 17 publication of the proposed rule, a final periods. rule to add the species to the Lists of [Docket No. FWS–R9–IA–2009–12; III. Costs and Benefits 4500030115] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. On July 7, 2009, we We have not analyzed the costs or RIN 1018–AV75 published a proposed rule in which we benefits of this rulemaking action determined that the blue-billed because the Act precludes consideration Endangered and Threatened Wildlife curassow, brown-banded antpitta, Cauca of such impacts on listing and delisting and Plants; Listing Five Foreign Bird guan, gorgeted wood-quail, and determinations. Instead, listing and Species in Colombia and Ecuador, Esmeraldas woodstar currently face delisting decisions are based solely on South America, as Endangered numerous threats and warrant listing the best scientific and commercial Throughout Their Range under the Act as endangered species (74 information available regarding the AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, FR 32308).
    [Show full text]
  • Geophis Nigroalbus Boulenger, 1908 (Serpentes, Dipsadidae), in the Magdalena Valley, Cordillera Oriental of Colombia
    16 1 NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Check List 16 (1): 115–119 https://doi.org/10.15560/16.1.115 First record of the goo-eater snake, Geophis nigroalbus Boulenger, 1908 (Serpentes, Dipsadidae), in the Magdalena Valley, Cordillera Oriental of Colombia Daniela García-Cobos1, Alejandro Corrales-García2, Gladys Cárdenas-Arévalo3, Azarys Paternina-Hernández3, Andrés Rymel Acosta-Galvis1 1 Subdirección de Investigaciones, Colecciones Biológicas, Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Carrera 8 # 15–08, Claustro de San Agustín, Villa de Leyva, Boyacá, Colombia. 2 Museo de Historia Natural ANDES, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de los Andes. Apartado 4976, Bogotá, Colombia. 3 Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Avenida Central del Norte 39–115, Tunja, Boyacá, Colombia. Corresponding author: Daniela García-Cobos, [email protected] Abstract Geophis nigroalbus Boulenger, 1908 is a fossorial and secretive colubrid snake endemic to the western Andes of Colombia. Here we report this species for the first time in the Cordillera Oriental in Middle Magdalena Valley. We expand the known distribution of G. nigroalbus 183 km east of its original range. Keywords Boyacá, Colubridae, endemic, range extension. Academic editor: Ross MacCulloch | Received 24 October 2019 | Accepted 6 January 2020 | Published 7 February 2020 Citation: García-Cobos D, Corrales-García A, Cárdenas-Arévalo G, Paternina-Hernández A, Acosta-Galvis AR (2020) First record of the goo-eater snake, Geophis nigroalbus Boulenger, 1908 (Serpentes, Dipsadidae), in the Magdalena Valley, Cordillera Oriental of Colombia. Check List 16 (1): 115–119. https://doi.org/10.15560/16.1.115 Introduction region (Myers 2003; Wilson and Townsend 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Ending Colombia's FARC Conflict: Dealing the Right Card
    ENDING COLOMBIA’S FARC CONFLICT: DEALING THE RIGHT CARD Latin America Report N°30 – 26 March 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. FARC STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES................................................................... 2 A. ADAPTIVE CAPACITY ...................................................................................................................4 B. AN ORGANISATION UNDER STRESS ..............................................................................................5 1. Strategy and tactics ......................................................................................................................5 2. Combatant strength and firepower...............................................................................................7 3. Politics, recruitment, indoctrination.............................................................................................8 4. Withdrawal and survival ..............................................................................................................9 5. Urban warfare ............................................................................................................................11 6. War economy .............................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Situation Report
    ISSUE 4 | January 24 - 30, 2009 HUMANITARIAN SITUATION REPORT UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs 1 Tel + 57 1 622 1100 | NY. + 1 212 201 2384 www.colombiassh.org ISSUE 4 | January 24 - 30, 2009 HUMANITARIAN SITUATION REPORT Events Humanitarian Situation 26 January 2009 Kidnnaping Follow-up: mass-displacement and Massacre confinement in Cauca IEA Victims Threats against community leaders triggered the Displacement Events mass-displacement of 1,229 persons of the Guangui indigenous reservation Attack Against Infrastructure Threats Against Civilians By mid September 2008, seven community leaders and teachers were threatened by UXO /APM Victims undetermined armed groups present in their Armed Confrontation indigenous reservation, causing the mass displacement of rural families from five Homicide communities into the urban sector of the town of 0 102030405060Bocas de San Francisco. To this date, threats have increased --those directly threatened (29 persons) remain in a temporary shelter in Bocas de San Events per department Francisco--. Boyacá, Vichada Meta, Santander A similar event took place last 29 September Valle del Cauca 2008 in this area. Back then, 61 out of 112 families Arauca, Huila of the San Miguel de Infi community located in the Cesar, Sucre Atlántico, Quindío Guangui reservation were forced to leave their Norte de Santander homes by an undetermined armed group. To this Chocó, Bolivar date, 31 families that could not displace still remain Bogotá D.C, Tolima confined in their territory under critical health and Antioquia nutritional conditions. On 1 January, one child died La Guajira, Cauca Risaralda of poor health. The current infrastructure for basic Nariño healthcare, education, shelter and communications Magdalena is inadequate.
    [Show full text]
  • Colombia's Killer Networks
    COLOMBIA'S KILLER NETWORKS The Military - Paramilitary Partnership and the United States The junior and mid-level officers who tolerated, planned, directed, and even took part in paramilitary violence in Colombia in the 1980s now occupy senior positions in the Colombian military. To be sure, a few, linked to well-publicized cases, have been forced into retirement or dismissed, but many more have been awarded medals for distinguished service and lead Colombia's troops. As commanders, they have not only promoted, encouraged, and protected paramilitary groups, but have used them to provide intelligence and assassinate and massacre Colombians suspected of being guerrilla allies. In fact, many victims - community and peasant leaders, trade unionists, and human rights monitors among them - have no ties to guerrillas, but have been trapped in a conflict where few wear uniforms or admit their rank. Human Rights Watch has obtained evidence, including the heretofore secret Colombian military intelligence reorganization plan called Order 200-05/91 and eyewitness testimony, that shows that in 1991, the military made civilians a key part of its intelligence-gathering apparatus. Working under the direct orders of the military high command, paramilitary forces incorporated into intelligence networks conducted surveillance of legal opposition political figures and groups, operated with military units, then executed attacks against targets chosen by their military commanders. Human Rights Watch has also documented the disturbing role played by the United States in support of the Colombian military. Despite Colombia's disastrous human rights record, a U.S. Defense Department and Central Intelligence Agency team worked with Colombian military officers on the 1991 intelligence reorganization that resulted in the creation of killer networks that identified and killed civilians suspected of supporting guerrillas.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Rastrojos – Extortion – Political Agenda – Police Corruption 13 March 2012
    Country Advice Colombia Colombia – COL39989 – Los Rastrojos – Extortion – Political Agenda – Police Corruption 13 March 2012 1. What is the status of Los Rastrojos – currently active, size, areas of activity (i.e. is its activity confined to particular regions of Colombia)? Los Rastrojos (or „The Stubble‟ in English) is active in Colombia and remains heavily involved in drug trafficking. Since its inception in 2002, the size and reach of the Los Rastrojos has rapidly increased and it is now one of the most powerful drug trafficking organisations in Colombia.1 A 2012 report published by the Brookings Institution2 states that Los Rastrojos is „by far the largest [drug] cartel in Colombia today‟.3 Similarly, in June 2011 Just the Facts4 noted that Los Rastrojos is „likely the most powerful “new” paramilitary group‟ in Colombia.5 In October 2011, Rodney Benson6 of the US Drug Enforcement Agency stated that Los Rastrojos – along with several other criminal organisations – continues to control key coca cultivation and transit areas throughout Colombia and receives a large proportion of its operational funding from drug trafficking.7 In several regions of Colombia, Los Rastrojos has developed alliances with other drug trafficking organisations including the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), the National Liberation Army (ELN) (both of which are leftist groups) and the notorious drug trafficker, Daniel „El Loco‟ Barrera Barrera.8 1 Insight (undated) 2011, Rastrojos, 25 February http://insightcrime.org/criminal-groups/colombia/rastrojos/item/63- rastrojos-profile - Accessed 7 March 2012 2 The Brookings Institution is a not-for-profit public policy think tank organisation based in Washington DC, America.
    [Show full text]
  • Elite Bargains and Political Deals Project: Colombia Case Study
    Elite Bargains and Political Deals Project: Colombia Case Study Roddy Brett Stabilisation Unit February 2018 This report has been produced by an independent expert. The views contained within do not necessarily reflect UK government policy. Author details The author is Senior Lecturer/Associate Professor with the School of International Relations at the University of St Andrews, and the Director of the Masters Programme in Peace and Conflict Studies and Acting Director of the Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies. He has acted as Advisor to the United Nations Development Programme in both Colombia and Guatemala, to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in Guatemala and as Advisor on Indigenous Affairs to the Norwegian Embassy in Guatemala. Background to Elite Bargains and Political Deals Project This case study is one of a series commissioned to support the Stabilisation Unit’s (SU’s) development of an evidence base relating to elite bargains and political deals. The project explores how national and international interventions have and have not been effective in fostering and sustaining political deals and elite bargains; and whether or not these political deals and elite bargains have helped reduce violence, increased local, regional and national stability and contributed to the strengthening of the relevant political settlement. Drawing on the case studies, the SU has developed a series of summary papers that bring together the project’s key findings and will underpin the revision of the existing ‘UK Approach to Stabilisation’ (2014) paper. The project also contributes to the SU’s growing engagement and expertise in this area and provides a comprehensive analytical resource for those inside and outside government.
    [Show full text]
  • Narcotics Funded Terrorists/Extremist Groups
    A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF NARCOTICS-FUNDED TERRORIST AND OTHER EXTREMIST GROUPS A Report Prepared by the Federal Research Division, Library of Congress under an Interagency Agreement with the Department of Defense May 2002 Researchers: LaVerle Berry Glenn E. Curtis Rex A. Hudson Nina A. Kollars Project Manager: Rex A. Hudson Federal Research Division Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 20540−4840 Tel: 202−707−3900 Fax: 202−707−3920 E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: http://www.loc.go v/rr/frd/ Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Narcotics-Funded Terrorist/Extremist Groups PREFACE This global survey, based entirely on open sources, is intended to provide an assessment of the nexus between selected anti-U.S. terrorist and extremist groups in the world and organized crime, specifically drug trafficking, and how this relationship might be vulnerable to countermeasures. More specifically, the aim is to help develop a causal model for identifying critical nodes in terrorist and other extremist networks that can be exploited by Allied technology, just as counterdrug technology has been used in the war against drug trafficking. To this end, the four analysts involved in this study have examined connections between extremist groups and narcotics trafficking in the following countries, listed by region in order of discussion in the text: Latin America: Triborder Region (Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay), Colombia, and Peru; the Middle East: Lebanon; Southern Europe (Albania and Macedonia); Central Asia: Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan; and East Asia: Philippines. These are preliminary, not definitive, surveys. Most of the groups examined in this study have been designated foreign terrorist organizations by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Domac/16, October 2011
    THE ICC AND ITS NORMATIVE IMPACT ON COLOMBIA‟S LEGAL SYSTEM BY ALEJANDRO CHEHTMAN DOMAC/16, OCTOBER 2011 ABOUT DOMAC THE DOMAC PROJECT focuses on the actual interaction between national and international courts involved in prosecuting individuals in mass atrocity situations. It explores what impact international procedures have on prosecution rates before national courts, their sentencing policies, award of reparations and procedural legal standards. It comprehensively examines the problems presented by the limited response of the international community to mass atrocity situations, and offers methods to improve coordination of national and international proceedings and better utilization of national courts, inter alia, through greater formal and informal avenues of cooperation, interaction and resource sharing between national and international courts. THE DOMAC PROJECT is a research program funded under the Seventh Framework Programme for EU Research (FP7) under grant agreement no. 217589. The DOMAC project is funded under the Socio-economic sciences and Humanities Programme for the duration of three years starting 1st February 2008. THE DOMAC PARTNERS are Hebrew University, Reykjavik University, University College London, University of Amsterdam, and University of Westminster. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Dr Alejandro Chehtman is Research Associate at the Centre for International Courts and Tribunals, Faculty of Laws, UCL and Assistant Professor at the University Torcuato Di Tella, Argentina. He has recently published a monograph on “The Philosophical Foundations of Extraterritorial Punishment” (Oxford University Press, 2010). He currently teaches Public International Law and International Criminal Law at UTDT. Dr Chehtman worked as a legal clerk at the Criminal Appeals Chamber and at the Public Defender Office in Argentina.
    [Show full text]