ISMB Organization

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ISMB Organization From: ISMB-99 Proceedings. Copyright © 1999, AAAI (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved. ISMB ’99 Organization Organizing Committee Thomas Lengauer, GMD–German National Research Center for Information Technology, Sankt Augustin, Germany Reinhard Schneider, LION bioscience AG, Heidelberg, Germany Peer Bork, Max Delbrück Centrum Berlin and EMBL Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany Douglas Brutlag, Stanford University, USA Janice Glasgow, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada Hans Werner Mewes, Munich Information Centre for Protein Sequences MIPS, Martinsried, Germany Ralf Zimmer, GMD–German National Research Center for Information Technology, Sankt Augustin, Germany Program Committee Ruben Abagyan, Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York, NY, USA Tatsuya Akutsu, Human Genome Center, Tokyo, Japan Lloyd Allison, Monash University, Australia Russ Altman, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Stephen Altschul, National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD, USA Michael Ashburner, European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge, UK Bonnie Berger, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA Søren Brunak, The Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark Barbara Bryant, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA Steve Bryant, National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD, USA Philip Bucher, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland Antoine Danchin, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France Valentina Di Francesco, Celera Genomics Corp., Rockville, MD, USA Sean Eddy, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA Jacquelyn S. Fetrow, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY, USA Dimitrij Frishman, Munich Information Centre for Protein Sequences, Martinsried, Germany Terry Gaasterland, Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA Michael Gribskov, San Diego Supercomputer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA David Haussler, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA Liisa Holm, European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge, UK Martin Huynen, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany Minoru Kanehisa, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan Peter Karp, Pangea Systems, Inc., Oakland, CA, USA Kevin Karplus, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA Toni Kazic, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA Teri Klein, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA John Koza, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA vi Alan Lapedes, Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, USA Rick Lathrop, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA Claudine Medigue, Universite Paris VI, Paris, France Gene Myers, Celera Genomics Corp., Rockville, MD, USA Christos Ouzounis, European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge, UK Christian Overton, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA Rebecca Parsons, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA Christopher Rawlings, Smithkline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Harlow, UK Burkhard Rost, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA Steven Salzberg, Johns Hopkins University, Rockville, MD, USA David Searls, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, PA, USA Jude Shavlik, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA Gary Stormo, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA Joel Sussman, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel William Taylor, MRC National Institute of Medical Research, London, UK Anna Tramontano, Department of Computational Biology and Chemistry, IRBM, Pomezia, Italy Alfonso Valencia, CNB-Centro Nacional de Biotechnology/CSIC-Spanish Research Council, Madrid, Spain Martin Vingron, DKFZ–German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany Edgar Wingender, GBF–German National Research Center for Biotechnology, Braunschweig, Germany Thomas Wu, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Additional Reviewers Additional reviewing assistance was provided by Pankaj Agarwal, Carolyn Allex, Vineet Bafna, Tom Blackwell, Christian Blaschke, Hidemasa Bono, Michael Brown, Jean-Paul Comet, Jonathan Crabtree, Antonio del Sol, Tom Dix, Brian Dunford Shore, José Mariá Fernández González, Greg Grant, Larry Greller, William Grundy, Sridhar Hannenhalli, Masahiro Hattori, Klaus Heumann, Victor Jongeneel, Andreas Kaps, Holger Karas, Shuichi Kawashima, Steen Knudsen, Anders Krogh, Armin Lahm, Christian Lemmen, Elisabetta Manduchi, Webb Miller, Henrik Nielsen, Juan Carlos Oliveros Collazos, Keun-joon Park, Florencio Pazos, Ken Rice, Eduardo Rocha, Marie-France Sagot, Kiminobu Sato, Alejandro Schaffer, Russell Schwartz, Ron Shamir, John Spouge, Nathan Srebro, Shamil Sunyaev, Dave Ussery, and William Wise. vii.
Recommended publications
  • Program Book
    Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2016 January 4-8, 2016 Big Island of Hawaii Program Book PACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING 2016 Big Island of Hawaii, January 4-8, 2016 Welcome to PSB 2016! We have prepared this program book to give you quick access to information you need for PSB 2016. Enclosed you will find • Logistics information • Menus for PSB hosted meals • Full conference schedule • Call for Session and Workshop Proposals for PSB 2017 • Poster/abstract titles and authors • Participant List Conference materials are also available online at http://psb.stanford.edu/conference-materials/. PSB 2016 gratefully acknowledges the support the Institute for Computational Biology, a collaborative effort of Case Western Reserve University, the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, and University Hospitals; the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the National Science Foundation (NSF); and the International Society for Computational Biology (ISCB). If you or your institution are interested in sponsoring, PSB, please contact Tiffany Murray at [email protected] If you have any questions, the PSB registration staff (Tiffany Murray, Georgia Hansen, Brant Hansen, Kasey Miller, and BJ Morrison-McKay) are happy to help you. Aloha! Russ Altman Keith Dunker Larry Hunter Teri Klein Maryln Ritchie The PSB 2016 Organizers PACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING 2016 Big Island of Hawaii, January 4-8, 2016 SPEAKER INFORMATION Oral presentations of accepted proceedings papers will take place in Salon 2 & 3. Speakers are allotted 10 minutes for presentation and 5 minutes for questions for a total of 15 minutes. Instructions for uploading talks were sent to authors with oral presentations. If you need assistance with this, please see Tiffany Murray or another PSB staff member.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Proceedingssmall
    1 COMMITTEES Steering Committee Phil Bourne - University of California, San Diego Eric Davidson - California Institute of Technology Steven Salzberg - The Institute for Genomic Research John Wooley - University of California San Diego, San Diego Supercomputer Center Organizing Committee Pat Blauvelt – LSS Membership Director Karen Hauge – Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Local Arangements Kass Goldfein - Finance Consultant AlishaHolloway – The J. David Gladstone Institutes, Tutorial Chair Sami Khuri – San Jose State University, Poster Chair Ann Loraine – University of North Carolina at Charlotte, CSB Publication Chair Fenglou Mao – University of Georgia, On-Line Registration and Refereeing Website Peter Markstein – in silico Labs, Program Co-Chair Vicky Markstein - Life Sciences Society, Conference Chair, LSS President Jean Tsukamoto - Graphics Design Bill Wang - Sun Microsystems Inc, LSS Information Technology Director Ying Xu – University of Georgia, Program Co-Chair Program Committee Tatsuya Akutsu – Kyoto University Chris Bailey-Kellogg – Dartmouth College Pierre Baldi – University of California Irvine Liming Cai – University of Georgia Bill Cannon – Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Jake Chen – Indiana University Bhaskar DasGupta – University of Illinois Chicago Andrey Gorin – Oak Ridge National Laboratory Matt Hibbs – Princeton University Wen-Lian Hsu – Academia Sinica Tamer Kahveci – University of Florida Carl Kingsford – University of Maryland Christina Leslie – Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Jing Li – Case Western Reserve
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2020 January 3-7, 2020 Big Island of Hawaii
    Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2020 January 3-7, 2020 Big Island of Hawaii Program Book PACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING 2020 Big Island of Hawaii, January 3-7, 2020 Welcome to PSB 2020! We have prepared this program book to give you quick access to information you need for PSB 2020. Enclosed you will find: • Logistics information • Medical services information • Full conference schedule (see website for the latest version) • Agendas for workshops and JBrowse demo • Call for Session and Workshop Proposals for PSB 2021 • Poster/abstract titles and author index • Participant list The latest conference materials are available online at http://psb.stanford.edu/conference-materials/. PSB 2020 gratefully acknowledges the support of the Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology; UPenn Institute for Biomedical Informatics; Variant Bio; Penn Center for Precision Medicine, Penn Medicine; Cipherome; Translational Bioinformatics Conference (TBC); the National Institutes of Health (NIH); and the International Society for Computational Biology (ISCB). If you or your institution are interested in sponsoring, PSB, please contact Tiffany Murray at [email protected] If you have any questions, the PSB registration staff (Tiffany Murray, Kasey Miller, BJ Morrison-McKay, and Cindy Paulazzo) are happy to help you. Aloha! Russ Altman Keith Dunker Larry Hunter Teri Klein Maryln Ritchie The PSB 2020 Organizers PACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING 2020 Big Island of Hawaii, January 3-7, 2020 SPEAKER INFORMATION Oral presentations of accepted proceedings papers will take place in Salon 2 & 3. Speakers are allotted 10 minutes for presentation and 5 minutes for questions for a total of 15 minutes. Instructions for uploading talks were sent to authors with oral presentations.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Aalberts Scott Aa
    PLOS Computational Biology would like to thank all those who reviewed on behalf of the journal in 2015: Daniel Aalberts Jeff Alstott Benjamin Audit Scott Aaronson Christian Althaus Charles Auffray Henry Abarbanel Benjamin Althouse Jean-Christophe Augustin James Abbas Russ Altman Robert Austin Craig Abbey Eduardo Altmann Bruno Averbeck Hermann Aberle Philipp Altrock Ferhat Ay Robert Abramovitch Vikram Alva Nihat Ay Josep Abril Francisco Alvarez-Leefmans Francisco Azuaje Luigi Acerbi Rommie Amaro Marc Baaden Orlando Acevedo Ettore Ambrosini M. Madan Babu Christoph Adami Bagrat Amirikian Mohan Babu Frederick Adler Uri Amit Marco Bacci Boris Adryan Alexander Anderson Stephen Baccus Tinri Aegerter-Wilmsen Noemi Andor Omar Bagasra Vera Afreixo Isabelle Andre Marc Baguelin Ashutosh Agarwal R. David Andrew Timothy Bailey Ira Agrawal Steven Andrews Wyeth Bair Jacobo Aguirre Ioan Andricioaei Chris Bakal Alaa Ahmed Ioannis Androulakis Joseph Bak-Coleman Hasan Ahmed Iris Antes Adam Baker Natalie Ahn Maciek Antoniewicz Douglas Bakkum Thomas Akam Haroon Anwar Gabor Balazsi Ilya Akberdin Stefano Anzellotti Nilesh Banavali Eyal Akiva Miguel Aon Rahul Banerjee Sahar Akram Lucy Aplin Edward Banigan Tomas Alarcon Kevin Aquino Martin Banks Larissa Albantakis Leonardo Arbiza Mukul Bansal Reka Albert Murat Arcak Shweta Bansal Martí Aldea Gil Ariel Wolfgang Banzhaf Bree Aldridge Nimalan Arinaminpathy Lei Bao Helen Alexander Jeffrey Arle Gyorgy Barabas Alexander Alexeev Alain Arneodo Omri Barak Leonidas Alexopoulos Markus Arnoldini Matteo Barberis Emil Alexov
    [Show full text]
  • Top 100 AI Leaders in Drug Discovery and Advanced Healthcare Introduction
    Top 100 AI Leaders in Drug Discovery and Advanced Healthcare www.dka.global Introduction Over the last several years, the pharmaceutical and healthcare organizations have developed a strong interest toward applying artificial intelligence (AI) in various areas, ranging from medical image analysis and elaboration of electronic health records (EHRs) to more basic research like building disease ontologies, preclinical drug discovery, and clinical trials. The demand for the ML/AI technologies, as well as for ML/AI talent, is growing in pharmaceutical and healthcare industries and driving the formation of a new interdisciplinary industry (‘data-driven healthcare’). Consequently, there is a growing number of AI-driven startups and emerging companies offering technology solutions for drug discovery and healthcare. Another important source of advanced expertise in AI for drug discovery and healthcare comes from top technology corporations (Google, Microsoft, Tencent, etc), which are increasingly focusing on applying their technological resources for tackling health-related challenges, or providing technology platforms on rent bases for conducting research analytics by life science professionals. Some of the leading pharmaceutical giants, like GSK, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Novartis, are already making steps towards aligning their internal research workflows and development strategies to start embracing AI-driven digital transformation at scale. However, the pharmaceutical industry at large is still lagging behind in adopting AI, compared to more traditional consumer industries -- finance, retail etc. The above three main forces are driving the growth in the AI implementation in pharmaceutical and advanced healthcare research, but the overall success depends strongly on the availability of highly skilled interdisciplinary leaders, able to innovate, organize and guide in this direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Computational Biology—2010
    FEATURE Trends in computational biology—2010 H Craig Mak Interviews with leading scientists highlight several notable breakthroughs in computational biology from the past year and suggest areas where computation may drive biological discovery. he field of computational biology encom- been featured in our pages and elsewhere; oth- Seq), but mapping and assembling the resulting Tpasses a set of investigative tools as much ers were completely off our radar. Although reads are challenging owing to the complexities as being a research endeavor in its own right. we surveyed a small group of 15 scientists, the introduced by RNA splicing. The two methods It is often difficult to gauge the utility and nominated papers (Box 1) provide a snapshot are the first that robustly assemble full-length significance of a computational tool, at least of some of the most exciting areas of current transcripts, including alternative splicing iso- until the research community has had suffi- computational biology research. forms. In contrast to previous approaches, these cient time to explore, exploit and hone it in All the papers featured in the following two methods first map reads to the genome various applications. In an effort to identify pages were nominated by at least two scien- using software that takes possible splice junc- recent notable breakthroughs in the field of tists. Our analysis not only highlights the rich- tions into account, thereby making assembly computational biology, Nature Biotechnology ness of approaches and growth of the field, but more manageable. Then, they apply graph- surveyed leading researchers in the area, also suggests that researchers of a particular based algorithms to determine1,2 and quantify1 asking them to nominate papers of particu- type are driving much of cutting-edge com- the most likely splice isoforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop on Human Language Technology and Knowledge
    AI Magazine Volume 23 Number 2 (2002) (© AAAI) Workshop Reports Knowledge Media Institute at The Workshop on Human Open University in England, gave the keynote entitled “Supporting Organizational Learning through the Language Technology and Enrichment of Documents.” Accord- ing to Domingue, only a small per- Knowledge Management centage of corporate training is ever applied within the workplace because organizations tend to use school- based methods of learning in con- trast to organizational learning based Mark T. Maybury on theories of learning in the work- place. Domingue described knowl- edge sharing by enriching web docu- ments with informal and formal representations, a process that cap- tures the context in which a docu- The Workshop on Human Language technologies that could enable ment is created and applied. Technology and Knowledge Manage- knowledge management functions Domingue demonstrated how this ment was held on July 6 and 7 in such as the following: enrichment facilitates retrieval and Toulouse, France, in conjunction Expert discovery: Modeling, cata- comprehension. with the meeting of the Joint Associ- loging, and tracking of distributed In addition, the group heard an ation for Computational Linguistics organizations and communities of invited talk from Hans Uszkoreit and European Association for Com- experts (DFKI Saarbruecken), scientific direc- putational Linguistics (ACL / EACL Knowledge discovery: Identifica- tor at the German Research Center ’01). Human language technologies tion and classification of knowledge for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), head promise solutions to challenges in from unstructured multimedia data of DFKI Language Technology Lab, human-computer interaction, infor- Knowledge sharing: Awareness of, and professor of computational lin- mation access, and knowledge man- and access to, enterprise expertise guistics at the Department of Com- agement.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2010
    Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 15:v-viii PACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING 2010 This year marks the 15th year of PSB. Started in 1996 by Teri Klein and Larry Hunter, the meeting was a session within the Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences Conference (HICSS) for a couple of years. The interest in biocomputing was great and was threatening to alter the balance of attendees within the HICSS meeting, and so the organizers asked Teri and Larry to find an alternative. Taking advantage of the nice meeting opportunities in Hawaii immediately following New Year’s Day, they created PSB with a simple formula: oral presentation of peer reviewed papers in emerging areas of biocomputing, interactive poster sessions, and lively discussion sessions on these topics. They invited Keith Dunker and Russ Altman to join the team for the second PSB, and we have been working together ever since. In fifteen years, we have had some papers that have made remarkable impact. Using Google Scholar, the top 15 papers, in terms of citations over the last 15 years are listed below (with number of citations listed as of September 2009, followed by the reference). Obviously, there are other great papers, especially ones that have been written in the last few years, that have not yet had time to rise to the top of this list. Nevertheless, the list provides highlights of the last 15 years in biocomputing challenges. (573) REVEAL, A General Reverse Engineering Algorithm for Inference of GeneticNetwork Architectures S. Liang, S. Fuhrman and R. Somogyi; Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 3:18-29 (1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Reports from the Fifth Edition of CAGI: the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation
    Received: 16 July 2019 | Accepted: 19 July 2019 DOI: 10.1002/humu.23876 OVERVIEW Reports from the fifth edition of CAGI: The Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation Gaia Andreoletti1 | Lipika R. Pal2 | John Moult2,3 | Steven E. Brenner1,4 1Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California Abstract 2Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Interpretation of genomic variation plays an essential role in the analysis of Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, cancer and monogenic disease, and increasingly also in complex trait disease, with Maryland 3Department of Cell Biology and Molecular applications ranging from basic research to clinical decisions. Many computational Genetics, University of Maryland, College impact prediction methods have been developed, yet the field lacks a clear consensus Park, Maryland on their appropriate use and interpretation. The Critical Assessment of Genome 4Center for Computational Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California Interpretation (CAGI, /'kā‐jē/) is a community experiment to objectively assess computational methods for predicting the phenotypic impacts of genomic variation. Correspondence John Moult, Institute for Bioscience and CAGI participants are provided genetic variants and make blind predictions of Biotechnology Research, University of resulting phenotype. Independent assessors evaluate the predictions by comparing Maryland, 9600 Gudelsky Drive, Rockville, MD 20850. with experimental and clinical data. Email: [email protected] CAGI has completed five editions with the goals of establishing the state of art in Steven E. Brenner, Department of Plant and genome interpretation and of encouraging new methodological developments. This Microbial Biology, University of California, special issue (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/10981004/2019/40/9) comprises Berkeley, CA 94720.
    [Show full text]
  • Preface Does Not Include Many Who Wished to Remain Anonymous, and of Course We Apologize to Any Who May Have Been Left out by Mistake
    Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2015 PACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING 2015 2015 marks the 20th Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (PSB)! PSB was founded by Larry Hunter and Teri Klein, who had previously organized a Biocomputing session at HICSS (Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences) which grew too big for its host conference. They decided to split the Biocomputing track and created PSB—in the early years they recruited Russ Altman and Keith Dunker as co-organizers, and were pleased to add Marylyn Ritchie more recently. The mission of PSB is to provide a forum for the best emerging science in Biocomputing, providing both formal and informal mechanisms for scientific communication—with an emphasis on work in the pacific rim. In addition to being published by World Scientific and indexed in PubMED, the proceedings from all PSB meetings are available online at http://psb.stanford.edu/psb-online/. PSB has published more than 800 papers. These papers are often cited in journal articles that emerge early in the growth of a new subfield, and many papers have achieved hundreds of citations. The Twitter handle PSB 2015 is @PacSymBiocomp and the hashtag this year will be #psb15. PSB depends on the community to define emerging areas in biomedical computation. Its sessions are usually conceived at the previous PSB meeting as people discuss trends and opportunities for new science. The typical program includes sessions that evolve over two to three years as well as entirely new sessions. This year we revisit cancer and personalized medicine (which continue to advance at dazzling speed), and add new sessions on crowdsourcing and gene-environment exposures.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgment of Reviewers, 2008
    Proceedings of the National Academy ofPNAS Sciences of the United States of America www.pnas.org Acknowledgment of Reviewers, 2008 The PNAS editors would like to thank all the individuals who dedicated their considerable time and expertise to the journal by serving as reviewers in 2008. Their generous contribution is deeply appreciated. A Sarah Ades Qais Al-Awqati Marwan Al-shawi Anne Andrews Stuart Aaronson Elizabeth Adkins-Regan Tom Alber Gre´goire Altan-Bonnet David Andrews Alejandro Aballay Frederick Adler Cristina Alberini Karlheinz Altendorf Tim Andrews Cory Abate-Shen Kenneth Adler Heidi Albers Sonia Altizer Timothy Andrews Abul Abbas Lynn Adler Jonathan Alberts Russ Altman Alex Andrianopoulos Antonio Abbate Ralph Adolphs Susan Alberts Eric Altschuler Jean-Michel Ane´ L. Abbott Luciano Adorini Urs Albrecht Burton Altura Phillip Anfinrud Hanna Abboud Johannes Aerts John Alcock N. R. Aluru Klaus Anger Maha Abdellatif Jeffrey Agar Kenneth Aldape Lihini Aluwihare Jacob Anglister Goncalo Abecasis Munna Agarwal Courtney Aldrich Pedro Alzari Wim Annaert Steffen Abel Sunita Agarwal Jane Aldrich David Amaral Brian Annex John Aber Aneel Aggarwal Richard Aldrich Luis Amaral Lucio Annunciato Hinrich Abken Ariel Agmon Kristina Aldridge Richard Amasino Aseem Ansari Carmela Abraham Noam Agmon Maria-Luisa Alegre Christian Amatore Kristi Anseth Edward Abraham Bernard Agranoff Nicole Alessandri-Haber Victor Ambros Eric Anslyn Aneil Agrawal R. McNeill Alexander Stanley Ambrose Kenneth Anthony Soman Abraham Anurag Agrawal Richard Alexander Indu Ambudkar
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2019 January 3-7, 2019 Big Island of Hawaii
    Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2019 January 3-7, 2019 Big Island of Hawaii Program Book PACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING 2019 Big Island of Hawaii, January 3-7, 2019 Welcome to PSB 2019! We have prepared this program book to give you quick access to information you need for PSB 2019. Enclosed you will find: • Logistics information • Menus for PSB hosted meals • Full conference schedule • Call for Session and Workshop Proposals for PSB 2020 • Poster/abstract titles and authors • Participant List Conference materials are also available online at http://psb.stanford.edu/conference-materials/. PSB 2019 gratefully acknowledges the support of the Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Second Genome, Icahn Institute for Data Science and Genomic Technology, Cipherome, and DNANexus; the National Institutes of Health (NIH); and the International Society for Computational Biology (ISCB). If you or your institution are interested in sponsoring, PSB, please contact Tiffany Murray at [email protected] If you have any questions, the PSB registration staff (Tiffany Murray, Kasey Miller, BJ Morrison-McKay, and Cindy Paulazzo) are happy to help you. Aloha! Russ Altman Keith Dunker Larry Hunter Teri Klein Maryln Ritchie The PSB 2019 Organizers PACIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON BIOCOMPUTING 2019 Big Island of Hawaii, January 3-7, 2019 SPEAKER INFORMATION Oral presentations of accepted proceedings papers will take place in Salon 2 & 3. Speakers are allotted 10 minutes for presentation and 5 minutes for questions for a total of 15 minutes. Instructions for uploading talks were sent to authors with oral presentations. If you need assistance with this, please see Tiffany Murray or another PSB staff member.
    [Show full text]