Investigating the Antibiosis Mechanism in Grain Sorghum To

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Investigating the Antibiosis Mechanism in Grain Sorghum To University of Southern Queensland New Midge Resistance for Australian Grain Sorghum A Dissertation Submitted by Adam Hardy Bachelor of Applied Science For the Award of Doctor of Philosophy 2007 i Abstract The development and commercial release of midge resistant grain sorghum hybrids in Australia has been one of the real success stories of the sorghum industry. Almost all the current commercial sorghum hybrids grown contain a significant baseline of midge resistance that has greatly reduced that pest status of this insect. However while breeding efforts have been successful, it seems only one mechanism of resistance remains present in commercial hybrids. This mechanism of resistance known as ‘ovipositional-antixenosis’ is polygenic in nature and has contributed to the gradual reduction in the genetic base of commercial sorghum hybrids, potentially limiting the advancement of other agronomic traits. In order to expand both the level of resistance and the genetic diversity within Australian commercial sorghum hybrids, research was undertaken to capture new sources of midge resistance. Initially the goal of this work was to isolate and characterise the most promising new antibiosis sources of midge resistance previously documented within international breeding lines. However as the work progressed the discovery of a previously undescribed tolerance source of midge resistance led to more detailed studies of midge larval biology within a narrow range of sorghum germplasm lines to better characterise the resistance mechanism. To complete this work a new water-injection technique was developed to allow more precise studies of midge larval biology where previous traditional screening methods were deemed inadequate. Using this method several antibiotic lines were shown to contain diverse modes of action, while the tolerance mechanism of resistance was confirmed and more accurately characterised. In all cases plant characters within the developing spikelet were associated with each resistance mechanism. Overall, one source of resistance, found in lines derived from the Indian land race line DJ6514, was identified as superior to the others tested. Germplasm derived from this source was found to confer inter-related antibiosis and tolerance mechanisms. Both mechanisms were indirectly shown to be caused by the unique ii antibiotic properties of the developing caryopsis. Larval mortality (antibiosis) increased in this line, in line with increased feeding against the developing caryopsis. A second tolerance mode of action was also linked to anti-feeding properties of the developing caryopsis. Larvae were recorded at higher than normal rates feeding away from the caryopsis resulting in the survival of both larvae and grain in a significant proportion of spikelets. This escape ‘tolerance’ mechanism of resistance was confirmed indirectly in several studies and could be artificially induced in other genotypes when larval feeding against the caryopsis was delayed. As such the resistance is better described as antixenosis to caryopsis feeding. When both resistance mechanisms are present, the resistance isolated from DJ6514 was found to cause a three to four fold increase in seed set in resistant lines. This source of resistance has been directly selected for incorporation into the Australian breeding program and has been shown to be inherited simply as a single gene that needs to be deployed on both sides of the breeding program to ensure stable expression. When breeding efforts are complete a new suite of highly resistant and genetically diverse midge resistant sorghum hybrids will emerge into the marketplace. iii Declaration I certify that the ideas, experimental work, results, analyses, software and conclusions reported in this dissertation are entirely my own effort, except where otherwise acknowledged. I also certify that the work is original and has not been previously submitted for any other award, except where otherwise acknowledged. ……………… Date: iv Previously Published Material Some parts of this work have been previously published and presented at several scientific conferences. All the work in Chapter 5 was published in: Hardy, A.T., Franzmann, B.A. & Sutherland, M. W. (2001) ‘Artificial infestation of sorghum spikelets with eggs of Stenodiplosis sorghicola (Coquillett) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) by water injection’, Australian Journal of Entomology, Vol. 40, pp. 380-385. Some of the screening results in Chapter 7 were used in: Hardy, A., Tao, Y. & Franzmann, B. 2001, ‘New Host-Plant Resistance to the Sorghum Midge and the Use of Molecular Marker Mediated Selection’, Proceedings of the Fourth Australian Sorghum Conference, Kooralbyn – Gold Coast Hinterland, CD Rom. Various parts of this research have also been presented in various forms at the following conferences: 2000 31st Annual Scientific Conference of the Australian Entomological Society 2001 Fourth Australian Sorghum Conference 2006 Fifth Australian Sorghum Conference v Acknowlegements Many have contributed to the work in this thesis over nearly a decade. Thanks to you all. Casual staff on university breaks have spent countless hours in the field and lab during summer. Lawrie Smith, Ken Duzza, Andrea Gerard, Petro Ioannis, Ashley Moore, Tammy Bull and James Mclean. QDPI&F biometricians Dave Butler, Kerry Bell and Alison Kelly gave me invaluable advice and assistance with statistical analyses. Nat Parker and Chris Freebairn took some of the great midge photos in this thesis. Thanks also to the sorghum breeding team at Hermitage for all their help in developing material for testing and for advice and assistance in the finer points of plant breeding. To my supervisors Dr Mark Sutherland, Dr Dave Jordan and Dr Bernie Franzmann, and my friends Cam and Heather Fletcher, I am deeply grateful for the long hours spent reviewing manuscripts and discussing the best way to write this thing. In particular I would like to thank Bernie for the many years of support and gentle guidance. Bernie you have always treated me more like a son than a student. This research was funded by GRDC and QDPI&F. To my beautiful wife Rosita, who kept me going to get this thing finished. You are also a great editor and a most cherished love of my life, thank you my darling. Finally I would like to dedicate this thesis to my parents, who over many years have sacrificed much for their kids. Even though you are highly unlikely to ever fully read this thing, mum and dad, this one’s for you! vi Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 Review of Literature........................................................ 1 Introduction............................................................................................................ 1 Sorghum Midge Biology ........................................................................................ 2 Grain Sorghum Biology......................................................................................... 7 Integrated Pest Management ................................................................................ 8 IPM of sorghum midge......................................................................................... 8 The contribution of midge resistant sorghum to IPM.......................................... 9 A rating scheme for midge resistant hybrids in Australia ................................. 10 Economic Impact on Industry ............................................................................ 11 Benefits of resistant hybrids to farmers ............................................................. 13 The emerging success of IPM in Australian grain sorghum.............................. 15 Host Plant Resistance Theory ............................................................................. 17 Durability of resistance...................................................................................... 17 Resistance mechanisms and components........................................................... 18 Ovipositional antixenosis................................................................................... 20 Antibiosis............................................................................................................ 21 Tolerance ........................................................................................................... 22 Midge Resistant Germplasm............................................................................... 23 Rationale and Structure ...................................................................................... 24 Chapter 2 – A search for new sources of midge resistance ........................... 24 Chapter 3 – A closer examination of larval antibiosis................................... 25 Chapter 4 – The water injection technique .................................................... 25 Chapter 5 – Using the water injection method to study larval antibiosis ...... 25 Chapter 6 – Is there a link between antibiosis and tolerance? ....................... 26 Chapter 7 – The inheritance of antibiosis ...................................................... 26 Chapter 8 – General discussion and future developments ............................. 26 CHAPTER 2 A Search for New Sources of Midge Resistance ......... 27 Introduction.......................................................................................................... 27 Materials and Methods........................................................................................ 28 Stage 1 – Screening for antibiosis.....................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Dipterists Forum
    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 ISSN 1358-5029 Editorial panel Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Assistant Editor Judy Webb Dipterists Forum Officers Chairman Martin Drake Vice Chairman Stuart Ball Secretary John Kramer Meetings Treasurer Howard Bentley Please use the Booking Form included in this Bulletin or downloaded from our Membership Sec. John Showers website Field Meetings Sec. Roger Morris Field Meetings Indoor Meetings Sec. Duncan Sivell Roger Morris 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 1QE Publicity Officer Erica McAlister [email protected] Conservation Officer Rob Wolton Workshops & Indoor Meetings Organiser Duncan Sivell Ordinary Members Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD [email protected] Chris Spilling, Malcolm Smart, Mick Parker Nathan Medd, John Ismay, vacancy Bulletin contributions Unelected Members Please refer to guide notes in this Bulletin for details of how to contribute and send your material to both of the following: Dipterists Digest Editor Peter Chandler Dipterists Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Secretary 122, Link Road, Anstey, Charnwood, Leicestershire LE7 7BX. John Kramer Tel. 0116 212 5075 31 Ash Tree Road, Oadby, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE2 5TE. [email protected] [email protected] Assistant Editor Treasurer Judy Webb Howard Bentley 2 Dorchester Court, Blenheim Road, Kidlington, Oxon. OX5 2JT. 37, Biddenden Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, Kent. ME15 8JP Tel. 01865 377487 Tel. 01622 739452 [email protected] [email protected] Conservation Dipterists Digest contributions Robert Wolton Locks Park Farm, Hatherleigh, Oakhampton, Devon EX20 3LZ Dipterists Digest Editor Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture No 3 PESTS of SORGHUM, PEARL MILLET and FINGER MILLET
    Lecture No 3 PESTS OF SORGHUM, PEARL MILLET AND FINGER MILLET I. PESTS OF SORGHUM More than 150 species of insects have been reported to damage sorghum. However over a dozen species are very serious and constitute a major constraint in sorghum production. Shoot fly, stem borers, shoot and ear head bug and aphids are serious pests that bring reduction in the yield. Major pests 1. Sorghum Shootfly Atherigona soccata Muscidae Diptera 2. Stem borer Chilo partellus Crambidae Lepidoptera 3. Pink stem borer Sesamia inferens Noctuidae Lepidoptera 4 Shoot bug Peregrinus maidis Delphacidae Hemiptera 5. Earhead bug Calocoris angustatus Miridae Hemiptera 6. Sorghum midge Contarinia sorghicola Cecidomyiidae Diptera Rhopalosiphum maidis, 7. Plant lice (Aphids) Aphididae Hemiptera Melanaphis sacchari Minor Pests 8. Earhead web worm Cryptoblabes gnidiella Pyraustidae Lepidoptera 9. Gram caterpillar Helicoverpa armigera Noctuidae Lepidoptera 10. Plant bug Dolycoris indicus Pentatomidae Hemiptera 11. Stink bug Nezara viridula Pentatomidae Hemiptera 12. Mirid bug Creontiades pallidifer Miridae Hemiptera 13. Slug caterpillar Thosea apierens Cochlididae Lepidoptera 14. Leaf roller Marasmia trapezalis Pyralidae Lepidoptera Cryptocephalus 15. Flea beetle schestedii, Monolepta Chrysomelidae Coleoptera signata Red hairy Amsacta albistriga, 16. Arctiidae Lepidoptera caterpillar A. moorei 17. Semilooper Eublemma silicula Noctuidae Lepidoptera Myllocerus maculosus 18. Weevils Curculionidae Coleoptera M. discolor,M. subfaciatus Wingless 19. Colemania sphenaroides Acrididae Orthoptera grasshopper MAJOR PESTS 1.Sorghum Shootfly: Atherigona soccata (Muscidae: Diptera) Distribution and status Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka Host range: Maize, ragi, bajra, rice, wheat and grasses Damage symptoms The maggot on hatching migrates to the upper surface of leaf and enters between the leaf sheath and stem.
    [Show full text]
  • Host-Plant Preference and Oviposition Responses of the Sorghum Midge, Stenodiplosis Sorghicola (Coquillett) (Dipt., Cecidomyiidae) Towards Wild Relatives of Sorghum
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ICRISAT Open Access Repository JAE 125 (2001) J. Appl. Ent. 125, 109±114 (2001) Ó 2001 Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag, Berlin ISSN 0931-2048 Host-plant preference and oviposition responses of the sorghum midge, Stenodiplosis sorghicola (Coquillett) (Dipt., Cecidomyiidae) towards wild relatives of sorghum H. C. Sharma2 and B. A. Franzmann1 1Department of Primary Industries, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia and 2 International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India Abstract: Sorghum midge, Stenodiplosis (Contarinia) sorghicola (Coquillett) is an important pest of grain sorghum world-wide. Considerable progress has been made in screening and breeding for resistance to sorghum midge. However, some of the sources of resistance have become susceptible to sorghum midge in Kenya, in eastern Africa. Therefore, the wild relatives of Sorghum bicolor were studied as a possible source of new genes conferring resistance to sorghum midge. Midge females did not lay eggs in the spikelets of Sorghum amplum, Sorghum bulbosum, and Sorghum angustum compared to 30% spikelets with eggs in Sorghum halepense when infested with ®ve midge females per panicle under no-choice conditions. However, one egg was laid in S. amplum when infested with 50 midges per panicle. A larger number of midges were attracted to the odours from the panicles of S. halepense than to the panicles of Sorghum stipoideum, Sorghum brachypodum, S. angustum, Sorghum macrospermum, Sorghum nitidium, Sorghum laxi¯orum, and S. amplum in dual-choice olfactometer tests. The dierences in midge response to the odours from S.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogo De Los Diptera De Nicaragua. 10. Cecidomyiidae (Nematocera)
    Rev Rev. Nica. Ent., (1990) 14B:33-41. CATALOGO DE LOS DIPTERA DE NICARAGUA. 10. CECIDOMYIIDAE (NEMATOCERA). Por Jean-Michel Maes.* Resumen. Este catálogo presenta las 8 especies de Cecidomyiidae (Diptera : Nematocera) reportadas de Nicaragua. Para cada especie se cita la sinonimia, la distribución geográfica, los hospederos y los enemigos naturales. La bibliografía conocida está agregada. Abstract. This catalogue presents the 8 species of Cecidomyiidae (Diptera : Nematocera) reported from Nicaragua. The geographical distribution, synonyms, hosts and natural enemies are given for each species. A bibliography of the Nicaraguayan species is included. * Museo Entomológico, S.E.A., A.P. 527, León, Nicaragua. file:///C|/My%20Documents/REVISTA/REV%2014B/14B%20Cecidomyiidae.htm (1 of 10) [11/11/2002 08:37:16 p.m.] Rev Introducción. Los Cecidomyiidae son Diptera Nematocera de tamaño pequeño, más conocidos por las agallas que producen sobre las plantas que por los insectos en sí. Los adultos son zancuditos muy pequeños, delicaditos, con patas y antenas largas. Las venas del área costal son fuertes, las demás, cuando existen son delgadas. Las larvas de la mayoría de las especies producen agallas en las plantas, las otras son fitófagas (algunas viven en agallas producidas por otros insectos) y algunas son saprófagas (ejemplo los Lestermiinae). Algunas especies son depredadoras de áfidos, escamas e insectos pequeñitos. Las larvas son gusanitos delgaditos con una marca en forma de T sobre el lado ventral del protórax. Son de coloración amarilla, anaranjada, roja o rosada. Las agallas producidas pueden ocurrir sobre cualquier parte de la planta y pueden tener muchas formas diferentes pero por una especie solo existe un tipo de agalla, siempre situado en el mismo lugar de una planta dada.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Pests of Economic Importance on Cereal Crops in the Senegal River Basin, West Africa
    AN ABSTRACT- OF THE THESIS OF Adama Sy for the degree ofMaster of Science in Entomology presented on June 10, 1977 Title: INSECT PESTS OF ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE ON CEREAL CROPS IN THE SENEGAL RIVER BASIN, WEST AFRICA Redacted for Privacy_ Abstract approved R. E. Berrybnd J. P. iattin Cereal crops cultivated in Mali, Mauritania and Senegal consist primarily of sorghum, millet, rice and maize. They form the gramin- eous crops that, are programmed for the agricultural improvementof the Senegal River Basin. Twelve economically important insect pests on these crops were selected for study and treated with regard to their potential hazard to crop production. The selection of these insect pests was based on entomological investigations carried out in Senegal, Mali and the Senegal River Valley. Information was gathered from similar ecological areas in the Paleotropic region. The following insect pests were selected: Diptera: Atherigona spp (Muscidae), Contarinia sorghicola (Coquillet) (Cecidomyiidae) and Orseolia oryzae (Wood-Mason) (Cecidomyiidae); Lepidoptera: Acigona ignefusalis (Hampson), Chilo zacconius Bleszynski, Maliarpha separa- tella Ragonot (Pyralidae), Heliothis armigera (Hubner), Sesamia calamistis Hampson, Spodoptera exempta (Walker) and Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Noctuidae); and Orthoptera: Locusta migra- toria migratorioides (Reiche and Fairmaire) and Schistocerca americana gregaria (Forskal) (Acrididae). Information pertaining to the identi- fication, distribution, host-plants, biology and control strategies, including agronomical and mechanical controls, varietal resistance, biological control and chemical control are presented for each pest. The physical environment in the Senegal River Basin and agricultural production of the Senegal River Valley are described. An overall assessment of the pest complex of cereal crops is given and the pre- sent status of insect pest control in the Senegal River Basin is discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Value of Sorghum Midge Resistant
    EVALUATION OF THE VALUE OF SORGHUM MIDGE RESISTANT HYBRIDS IN THE USA A Thesis by JOAQUIM AMERICO MUTALIANO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2005 Major Subject: Plant Breeding EVALUATION OF THE VALUE OF SORGHUM MIDGE RESISTANT HYBRIDS IN THE USA A Thesis by JOAQUIM AMERICO MUTALIANO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved by: Chair of Committee, William L. Rooney Committee Members, Marvin Harris Gary C. Peterson Head of Department, Wayne Smith December 2005 Major Subject: Plant Breeding iii ABSTRACT Evaluation of the Value of Sorghum Midge Resistant Hybrids in the USA. (December 2005) Joaquim Americo Mutaliano, B.S., Eduardo Mondlane University, Mozambique Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. William L. Rooney Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench) production in many areas of the world is reduced due to damage caused by sorghum midge (Stenodiplosis sorghicola). There are several methods of control to reduce losses due to sorghum midge, which include cultural practices, biological control, chemical control and resistant cultivars. The best long-term solution for sorghum midge control is the use of genetic resistance in cultivars and hybrids. Recently, sorghum midge resistant hybrids have been developed by several sorghum breeding programs, but there is limited information about agronomic performance relative to planting dates compared to susceptible standards. Thus, the objectives of this research project are: (1) to evaluate the value of sorghum midge resistant sorghum hybrids in the USA production system, (2) to confirm the presence of sorghum midge insect resistance in sorghum hybrids, and (3) to determine whether the resistance in eighteen sorghum hybrids is stable across two environments in Texas where sorghum midge is a damaging pest.
    [Show full text]
  • Contarinia Sorghicola (Coquillett) in Sorghum Under Southern Tamil Nadu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PROTECTION e ISSN-0976-6855 | Visit us : www.researchjournal.co.in VOLUME 10 | ISSUE 1 | APRIL, 2017 | 167-173 IJPP RESEARCH PAPER DOI : 10.15740/HAS/IJPP/10.1/167-173 Population dynamics and bio-intensive management of sorghum midge, Contarinia sorghicola (Coquillett) in sorghum under southern Tamil Nadu P. ANANDHI*, S. ELAMATHI AND B. ARTHI RANI Agricultural Research Station (T.N.A.U.), KOVILPATTI (T.N.) INDIA (Email: [email protected]; [email protected]) ARITCLE INFO ABSTRACT Received : 31.01.2017 Surveys on distribution of sorghum midge at southern region of Tamil Nadu during Revised : 24.03.2017 2011 to 2014 indicated that, midge observed in all areas of three districts. Effect of Accepted : 28.03.2017 abiotic factors on sorghum midge revealed that maximum, minimum temperature, wind KEY WORDS : velocity and sunshine were positive while maximum, minimum relative humidity and Sorghum, Midge, Contarinia rainfall showed negative correlation. Among bio-intensive management strategies, Neem sorghicola; Survey, Population oil 3 per cent showed maximum reduction (63.36), minimum midge incidence/ 5 panicle dynamics, Bio-intensive management (17.5) and maximum grain yield (2498 kg/ha) when compared to control (244 kg/ha). The highest incremental cost benefit ratio (ICBR) obtained in Neem seed kernel extract (NSKE) 5 per cent (1:24.7) followed by Neem leaf extract 5 per cent (1:22.3) treated plots. How to view point the article : Anandhi, P., Elamathi, S. and Arthi Rani, B. (2017). Population dynamics and bio-intensive management of sorghum midge, Contarinia sorghicola (Coquillett) in *Corresponding author: sorghum under southern Tamil Nadu.
    [Show full text]
  • TAXONOMY, ETHOLOGY, and ECOLOGY of Phidippus (ARANEAE: SALTICIDAE) in EASTERN NORTH AMERICA
    TAXONOMY, ETHOLOGY, AND ECOLOGY OF Phidippus (ARANEAE: SALTICIDAE) IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA BY GLAVIS BERNARD EDWARDS, JR. A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE COUNCIL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1980 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In a work of this scope, it is impossible to individually thank every person who has contributed to its completion, but I do sincerely thank every one of you. I would like to single out my committee members: Dr. W. H. Whitcomb, who tolerated the development of lines of research astray from his own; Dr. Jonathan Reiskind, for his positive reinforcement and assistance; and Dr. T. J. Walker, for demanding excellence. Various types of technical assistance were provided by Mrs. Thelma C. Carlysle, Mr. P. M. Choate, Dr. Jonathan Reiskind, and Dr. Robert Paul. Special thanks are due Mrs. Katrina Vaughanfor typing the manuscript and going to special effort to help make deadlines. For identifications of prey and enemy records I thank Mrs. E. C. Beck, and Drs. W. F. Buren, R. J. Gagne, E. E. Grissell, D. H. Habeck, F. W. Harmston, L. A. Hetrick, K. W. Knopf, P. M. Marsh, F. W. Mead, E. L. Mock- ford, J. C. E. Nickerson, C. W. Sabrosky, R. I. Sailer, L. A. Stange, T. J. Walker, H. V. Weems, Jr., and R. E. Woodruff. Thanks are due the technical staff of the Bureau of Entomology, Division of Plant Industry, for their assistance and encouragement. This list would not be complete without mentioning the dear friends who have put up with me and helped in so many ways: Ron and Peggy Williams, Earl Williams, Allen Mosler, Fred and Peggy Hansen, Anzle Mead, Wanda Weintraub, Ruth Schaeffer, Mary Warren; my parents, Glavis and Margaret Edwards, for their patient and continued support; and most of all, my wife, Sue, who has managed to keep both of us going.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparativo De Insecticidas Para El Control De Prodiplosis Long-Ifila
    UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AGRARIA LA MOLINA FACULTAD DE AGRONOMIA Comparativo de insecticidas para el control de Prodiplosis longifila Gagné (Diptera : Cecidomyiidae) en el cultivo de papa (Solanum tuberosum) Var. Canchán. Tesis para optar el Título de: INGENIERO AGRONOMO Erika Iris Fernández Kohatsu. Lima- Perú 2016 Dedicatoria A la memoria de mi madre, Isabel por todo el amor y dedicación que diste a tus padres, hijos y sobrinos. A mi preciosa ñañi Alejandra Saori la luz de mi camino. AGRADECIMIENTOS • Al Ing. Agr., Mg. Sc. Guillermo Sánchez, por haberme brindado la oportunidad de realizar el presente trabajo de tesis, por su imprescindible apoyo durante la redacción del mismo y por las enseñanzas y formación brindada durante los años de estudio. • Al Centro Internacional de la Papa por apoyar y financiar este proyecto de investigación. • A los Ing. Norma Mujica y Felizardo Fabián por su invaluable colaboración durante de la instalación y conducción de los campos de cultivo de papa donde se realizaron los ensayos. • A mis amigos Jackelin Hop, Sara Robles y Angelo Soto, compañeros invalorables quienes me apoyaron desinteresadamente a lo largo de toda la fase experimental de la tesis. • A Mónica Narrea, Ronald Barboza, Keiko Yangali e Ivon Yangali amigos que de una u otra manera incentivaron y me apoyaron en la conclusión del presente trabajo de tesis. INDICE RESUMEN ..……………………………………………………………………………………..…...1 ABSTRACT ……………………………………………...…………………………………..………2 I. INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera Chapter 10
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal BioRisk 4(2): 553–602 (2010) Diptera. Chapter 10 553 doi: 10.3897/biorisk.4.53 RESEARCH ARTICLE BioRisk www.pensoftonline.net/biorisk Diptera Chapter 10 Marcela Skuhravá1, Michel Martinez2, Alain Roques3 1 Bítovská 1227/9, 140 00 Praha 4, Czech Republic 2 INRA Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Popu- lations (CBGP), Campus International de Baillarguet, 34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez, France 3 INRA UR633 Zoologie Forestière, 2163 Av. Pomme de pin, 45075 Orléans, France Corresponding authors: Marcela Skuhravá ([email protected]), Michel Martinez ([email protected]. fr), Alain Roques ([email protected]) Academic editor: David Roy | Received 4 February 2010 | Accepted 24 May 2010 | Published 6 July 2010 Citation: Skuhravá M et al. (2010) Diptera. Chapter 10. In: Roques A et al. (Eds) Alien terrestrial arthropods of Europe. BioRisk 4(2): 553–602. doi: 10.3897/biorisk.4.53 Abstract Of the 19,400 native species and 125 families forming the European diptera fauna, 98 species (less than 0.5%) in 22 families are alien to Europe. Th ese aliens constitute 66 species (18 families) of the suborder Brachycera and 32 species (4 families) of the suborder Nematocera. By family in this category, there are 23 Cecidomyiidae species, 18 Drosophilidae, nine Phoridae, eight Tachinidae and seven Culicidae. Another 32 fl y species belonging to fi ve families are considered to be alienin Europe. Th ese invasives native to other European countries are composed of 14 species of Cecidomyiidae, seven Syrphidae, fi ve Culicidae and three species each of Anthomyiidae and Tephritidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Cecidomyiidae): Morphological and Behavioural Evidence
    Eur. J. Entomol. 111(1): 75–81, 2014 doi: 10.14411/eje.2014.009 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Female sex pheromone gland of the boxwood leafminer, Monarthropalpus buxi (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae): Morphological and behavioural evidence 1 1 1 2 1 PAOLA RIOLO , SARA RUSCHIONI , ROXANA L. MINUZ , ROBERTO ROMANI and NUNZIO ISIDORO * 1 Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Ambientali, Università Politecnica delle Marche,Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy; e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali, Università di Perugia, 06121 Perugia, Italy; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Diptera, Cecidomyiidae, gall midge, secretory structure, ultra-structure, reproductive biology Abstract. Morphological studies were carried out to determine whether females of the boxwood leafminer, Monarthropalpus buxi (Laboulbène) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) have a pheromone gland, its position and ultra-structure. In addition, the reproductive behav- iour of this gall midge was studied in the laboratory in a wind-tunnel. The source of the sex pheromone was identified as the epi- dermis of the inter-segmental membrane between the 8th and 9th abdominal segments of females. The epidermis there was hypertrophied and consisted of a unicellular layer of secretory cells with ultra-structural features that include a well developed smooth endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi complexes that are typical of pheromone-producing glands. At adult emergence the sex ratio was 1 : 1. The virgin females extruded their ovipositor and moved it slowly (visible using a video-camera at high magnification), which was followed by mating.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology and Control of the Sorghum Midge '
    LIBRARY Technical Bulletin No. 778 • J UNITED STA' 'U^ Oapartmwtt ûf âgne lîu'P DEPARTMENT OF AG EIICVÍTURE WASHINGTON, D. C. The Biology and Control of the Sorghum Midge ' By E. V. WALTBK Associate entomologist. Division of Cereal and Forage Insect Investigations, Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine ' CONTENTS Page Page Introduction - 1 Sources of infestation 17 History of ttie sorghum midge in America. 2 Precocious blooms 17 l)istril3ution of the sorghum midge 4 Early crops-. 18 Host plants 4 Parasites and predators 18 Injury to sorghum 5 Parasites __ — 18 Other causes of sterility- a Predaceous enemies 2U Life liistory _ 6 Control measures.- _. 21 The egg- --- .- Rogueing early blooming headS- 21 The larva Planting pure seed 21 The pupa Planting resistant varieties 22 The adult Date and rate of seeding - 23 Methods of distribution Cultivation.. 23 Transportation in seed and hay- - Insecticides and repellents 23 Dispersal by flight Suggestions for control 24 Summary 24 Literature cited - 25 INTRODUCTION The grain and sweet sorghums, together with the coarse hays made up of Johnson grass and Sudan grass, form a very considerable portion of the feed grown in the southern and western portions of the United States. Throughout much of those regions a large part of the seed occasionally fails to develop, resulting in a condition commonly known as blast or blight. A number of causes for this condition are known, such as adverse weather, pathological conditions, birds, and several insect pests. The most common and at the same time the most destructive agency is a minute fly known as the sorghum midge (Contarinia sorghicola (Coq.)).' If a head of any of the susceptible host plants is examined while in bloom, small, orange-colored midges may be found busily ovipositing in the spikolets.
    [Show full text]