Fiscal Year 2015
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Arizona Department of Public Safety Capitol Police District
The Arizona Department of Public Safety Capitol Police District History and Development The Arizona Capitol Security was established in 1966 and was overseen by the Superintendent of Public Buildings Maintenance for protection of state property and regulating traffic and parking around the Arizona Capitol Mall in Phoenix, Arizona. In 1972 the Arizona Capitol Security became the Arizona Capitol Police, was granted law enforcement powers and became responsible for providing security for the Arizona Executive Governors Tower; State legislative House and Senate and state buildings located on the Capitol Mall. For well over a decade several attempts were made to transition the Arizona Capitol Police over to the Arizona Department of Public Safety (DPS). The Arizona DPS has constitutional responsibilities to provide dignitary protection for the Governor of Arizona whose executive office is located in the Executive Governors Tower. The Arizona DPS also has had sworn supervisors assigned to the state legislative House & Senate buildings where they provide security. Both agencies provided law enforcement services at the Capitol Mall but remained separate agencies. The Arizona DPS would also provide the Arizona Capitol Police assistance with manpower and resources during large scale events and protests that occurred at the Arizona Capitol Mall in Phoenix and at the Southern Arizona Capitol Complex located in Tucson, Arizona. The Arizona Capitol Police was long seen as a sister agency of the Arizona DPS. In July 2011, legislation was enacted that transitioned the Arizona Capitol Police over to the Arizona DPS. The Arizona Capitol Police District continues to be responsible for providing critical law enforcement services for 8,000-10,000 state employees and 53 state buildings located at the Capitol Mall. -
Of Insurance Annual Report
Arizona Depar1tmen1t Of Insurance 2000/2001 Annual Report Jane Dee Hun Governor Charles R~ Cohen Director of Insurance 028 Please contact our Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator at (602) 912-8456 if you need reasonable accommodations due to a disability or handicap with regard to this publication or other services of this Department. Requests should be made as early as possible to allow reasonable time to make necessary arrangements or procure materials in an alternate format. Charles R~ Cohen Director of Insurance to Jane Dee Hull Governor and Members of the Arizona Legisla11:ure Arizona Department of Insurance 2910 North 44th Street, Suite 210 Phoenix, Arizona 85018-7256 (602) 912-8400 The information in this report is in the public domain and may be reprinted without permission. * To provide the reader with the most up-to-date information about the Department of Insurance, this report contains the most current, complete data available, which in some cases is for Calendar Year 2000 and in others is for Fiscal Year 2001 (7101100 through 6130101). Generally, data concerning the Department's licensees is reported for Calendar Year 2000, while data relating to the Department's operations is reported for Fiscal Year 2001. Exceptions are noted. \\'''"" ,.' ,. ;.· . TABLE OF CONTENTS ~t" . - . Directory 1 Message from the Director of Insurance 2 Strategic Plan Summary 3 Division Reports 4 Director's Office 5 Administrative Services and Licensing 7 Consumer Affairs 9 Financial Affairs 12 Rates and Regulations 15 Life and Health -
Romney Takes on Trump After Super Tuesday, Sanders' Supporters Go
blogs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2016/03/04/romney-takes-on-trump-after-super-tuesday-sanders-supporters-go-after-warren-and-job- growth-continues-us-national-blog-roundup-for-27-february-4-march/ Romney takes on Trump after Super Tuesday, Sanders’ supporters go after Warren, and job growth continues: US national blog roundup for 27 February – 4 March USAPP Managing Editor, Chris Gilson looks at the best in political blogging from around the Beltway. Jump to The 2016 campaign Super Tuesday The Democratic Candidates The Republican Candidates The 11th GOP debate The Obama Administration The Beltway and the Supreme Court Foreign policy, defense and trade Obamacare and health policy The economy and society The 2016 Campaign Welcome back to USAPP’s regular round up of commentary from US political blogs from the past week. The big news this week was Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton’s Super Tuesday victories, bringing them one step closer to the respective Republican and Democratic presidential nominations. We’ll get in to more detail on the Super Tuesday results in a minute, but first, we take a look at commentary on the campaign in general. On Monday – ahead of Super Tuesday – FiveThirtyEight says that if we want to understand what’s ‘roiling’ the 2016 election, then we should pay Oklahoma a visit, given the populist enthusiasm of many of its voters. Credit: DonkeyHotey (Flickr, CC-BY-SA-2.0) For many, a Trump/Clinton showdown for the general election now seems to be inevitable. Political Animal gives some early thoughts on how such a race might run, writing that Clinton will be more than happy to go after Trump hard, unlike his GOP primary challengers. -
Insider's Guidetoazpolitics
olitics e to AZ P Insider’s Guid Political lists ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE ARIZONA CAPITOL TIMES • Arizona Capitol Reports FEATURING PROFILES of Arizona’s legislative & congressional districts, consultants & public policy advocates Statistical Trends The chicken Or the egg? WE’RE EXPERTS AT GETTING POLICY MAKERS TO SEE YOUR SIDE OF THE ISSUE. R&R Partners has a proven track record of using the combined power of lobbying, public relations and advertising experience to change both minds and policy. The political environment is dynamic and it takes a comprehensive approach to reach the right audience at the right time. With more than 50 years of combined experience, we’ve been helping our clients win, regardless of the political landscape. Find out what we can do for you. Call Jim Norton at 602-263-0086 or visit us at www.rrpartners.com. JIM NORTON JEFF GRAY KELSEY LUNDY STUART LUTHER 101 N. FIRST AVE., STE. 2900 Government & Deputy Director Deputy Director Government & Phoenix, AZ 85003 Public Affairs of Client Services of Client Public Affairs Director Development Associate CONTENTS Politics e to AZ ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE Insider’s Guid Political lists STAFF CONTACTS 04 ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE BEATING THE POLITICAL LEGISLATIVE Administration ODDS CONSULTANTS, DISTRICT Vice President & Publisher: ARIZONA CAPITOL TIMES • Arizona Capitol Reports Ginger L. Lamb Arizonans show PUBLIC POLICY PROFILES Business Manager: FEATURING PROFILES of Arizona’s legislative & congressional districts, consultants & public policy advocates they have ‘the juice’ ADVOCATES, -
Governor Decision-Making: Expansion of Medicaid Under the Affordable Care Act
Governor Decision-making: Expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act By Robin Flagg A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Health Services and Policy Analysis in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ann C. Keller, Chair Professor William H. Dow Professor John Ellwood Professor Paul Pierson Fall 2014 Governor Decision-making: Expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act Copyright 2014 By Robin Flagg Abstract Governor Decision-making: Expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act By Robin Flagg Doctor of Philosophy in Health Services and Policy Analysis University of California, Berkeley Professor Ann C. Keller, Chair This is a study of factors that influence gubernatorial decision making. In particular, I ask why some governors decided to expand Medicaid under the Accountable Care Act (ACA) while others opted against it. Governors, like all chief executives, are subject to cross-pressures that make their jobs challenging. Budgetary pressures may differ from personal ideology and administrative infrastructures may not allow for decisive moves. Add to the equation political pressures – in particular the pressure to align with partisan positions – and a governor is faced with a myriad of opposing and interrelated factors, each requiring attention, when taking a particular position. The calculation required of a governor when deciding upon a salient issue is thus extremely complicated and nuanced. Although interesting in its own right, governor decision making is of additional significance because it may shed light on how the effects of increasing party strength and polarization are playing out at the state level. -
Coming Events
The Official Newsletter of the Arizona State Capitol Chapter of NIGP March 2015 AZ NIGP P.O. Box 18123 Phoenix, AZ 85005 ARIZONA STATE CAPITOL CHAPTER 2015 Executive Board President Irma Guzman, CPPB .............602-506-8715 [email protected] Vice-President Bill Munch…..........……….. ….602-677-1988 [email protected] Your Executive Board members of the Arizona Capitol Chapter of NIGP Secretary Gary Barkman.........................480-472-6116 are pleased to take this opportunity to acknowledge all of your hard [email protected] work, and to recognize the efforts you so painstakingly make to fulfill the procurement needs and goals of your agency. Treasurer Sharon Brause, CPPO,………480-644-2815 . [email protected] In conjunction with the National Institute of Governmental Purchasing (NIGP) and other public purchasing and contracting organizations Immediate Past President Valarie Erwin, CPPB................602-712-8562 across the country that recognize outstanding public purchasing and [email protected] contracting professionals each year, March is recognized as National Purchasing month. Inside This Issue When we celebrate Purchasing month, we are acknowledging “an elite Pres. Message......................... …………….1 group of professionals that have made a difference in governmental Procurement Proclamation 2015…………...2 efficiency and effectiveness.” (According to the National Institute of Congratulations CPPO’s…………………….3 Governmental Purchasing website: www.nigp.org . The goals of Congratulations CPPB’s…………………….4 March/April Training Opportunities…………5 purchasing agents are to assure the highest value for the taxpayer’s NIGP Local Chapter Information……………6 dollar. This is not always an easy for us as Procurement professionals Helpful Web-links…………...……...………..7 but it’s a challenge that is met head on by the outstanding professionals It’s Silly March……................................... -
Revisiting the Urban-Rural Relationship in Arizona
Revisiting the Urban-Rural Relationship in Arizona David R. Berman Professor Emeritus of Political Science Arizona State University November 2019 Throughout the nation, there has been somewhat of a Table 1. Arizona Population, Percent Urban, Compared to revival in urban living, and many big cities seem relatively National Population* well off in economic terms, though progress has been uneven. On the other hand, many rural areas have been Year Arizona Percent National Population Population in decline and seem likely to continue to lose out when it Urban Percent Urban comes to population, economic development, and political influence in state politics. A wide variety of socio-economic 1900 122,931 15.9 39.6 measurements indicate that rural counties are in particularly bad shape, far worse off than the other major population 1910 204,354 31.0 45.6 groupings of big cities, suburbs, and small-to-medium metro 1920 334,162 36.1 51.2 areas.1 Population losses, unemployment, and poverty are 1930 435,573 34.4 56.1 common to many small towns in rural areas. One can find numerous examples of towns where a major employer has 1940 499,261 34.8 56.5 shut down or moved away and the community shrinks to a 1950 749,587 55.5 64.0 point where governments can do virtually nothing to stem 1960 74.5 69.9 the contraction.2 1,302,161 1970 1,770,900 79.6 73.6 This report, based on an examination of population, voting, 1980 2,718,215 83.8 73.7 and governmental spending information, relevant archival and secondary sources, and a series of interviews, looks into 1990 3,665,228 87.5 75.2 the long-term developments affecting urban-rural relations 2000 5,130,632 88.2 79.0 in Arizona. -
" O O O O O O O O O
'I; STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICIAL CANVASS - PRIMARY ELECTION - September 13, 1994 Page 1 Compiled and lssued by Secretary of State September 26, 1994 " SANTA APACHE COCHISE COCONINO GILA GRAHAM GREENLEE LA PAZ MARICOPA MOHAVE NAVAJO PIMA PINAL CRUZ YAVAPAI YUMA TOTAL DEMOCRATIC REGISTRATION 22,329 24,568 34,377 16,325 8,033 4,209 3,468 429,244 23,483 23,691 188,866 34,414 8,339 26,008 21,809 869,163 REPUBLICAN REGISTRATION 5,928 17,796 25,804 8,154 3,869 801 2,772 583,292 28,483 13,396 153,062 16,969 3,106 40,247 16,452 920,131 LIBERTARIAN REGISTRATION 62 103 346 48 7 o 15 4,199 128 53 1,436 118 22 314 80 6,931 OTHER REGISTRATION 2,272 5,239 8,m 1,466 592 136 652 156,983 7,995 2,636 51,057 4,611 1,034 9,567 4,232 257,245 TOTAL REGISTRATION 30,591 47,706 69,300 25,993 12,501 5,146 6,907 1,173,718 60,089 39,776 394,421 56, 112 12,501 76, 136 42,573 2,053,470 DEMOCRATIC BALLOTS CAST 7,817 9,370 7,072 7,305 3,140 1,834 994 128,283 7,033 8,285 56,338 13,178 3,750 9,488 5,810 269,697 REPUBLICAN BALLOTS CAST 1,789 6,593 5,757 3,319 1,575 274 951 195,900 9,647 5,179 49,643 5,824 1,070 16,406 4,553 308,480 LIBERTARIAN BALLOTS CAST 179 171 233 74 25 1 31 5,335 294 100 1,575 78 48 434 185 8,763 TOTAL BALLOTS CAST 9,785 16,134 13,062 10,698 ./t,740 2,109 1,976 329,518 16,974 13,564 107,556 19,080 4,868 26,328 10,548 586,940 PERCENT DEMOCRATIC VOTES CAST 35.01 38.14 20.57 44.75 39.09 43.57 28.66 29.89 29.95 34.97 29.83 38.29 44.97 36.48 26.64 31.03 PERCENT REPUBLICAN VOTES CAST 30.18 37.05 22.31 40.70 40.71 34.21 34.31 33.59 33.87 38.66 32.43 34.32 34.45 40.76 27.67 33.53 PERCENT LIBERTARIAN VOTES CAST 288.71 166.02 67.34 154. -
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 112 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 112 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 157 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JULY 27, 2011 No. 114 House of Representatives The House met at 10 a.m. and was other fees that pay for the aviation weather. We need that system. Well, if called to order by the Speaker pro tem- system. It is partially funded by the this impasse continues, we will not pore (Mr. MARCHANT). users of that system with ticket taxes have that system by next winter. f and such. That is $200 million a week. Now, who is that helping? Who are Now, what’s happened since? Well, you guys helping over there with these DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO three airlines, three honest airlines— stupid stunts you’re pulling here? $200 TEMPORE Frontier Airlines, Alaska, and Virgin million a week that the government The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- America—lowered ticket prices be- isn’t collecting that would pay for fore the House the following commu- cause the government isn’t collecting these critical projects, put tens of nication from the Speaker: the taxes. But the other airlines, not so thousands of people to work, and now WASHINGTON, DC, much. They actually raised their tick- it’s a windfall to a bunch of airlines. July 27, 2011. et prices to match the taxes, and But don’t worry, the Air Transport I hereby appoint the Honorable KENNY they’re collecting the windfall. Association says, these short-term in- MARCHANT to act as Speaker pro tempore on At the same time, their association, creases, that is by the airlines increas- this day. -
Understanding the 2016 Gubernatorial Elections by Jennifer M
GOVERNORS The National Mood and the Seats in Play: Understanding the 2016 Gubernatorial Elections By Jennifer M. Jensen and Thad Beyle With a national anti-establishment mood and 12 gubernatorial elections—eight in states with a Democrat as sitting governor—the Republicans were optimistic that they would strengthen their hand as they headed into the November elections. Republicans already held 31 governor- ships to the Democrats’ 18—Alaska Gov. Bill Walker is an Independent—and with about half the gubernatorial elections considered competitive, Republicans had the potential to increase their control to 36 governors’ mansions. For their part, Democrats had a realistic chance to convert only a couple of Republican governorships to their party. Given the party’s win-loss potential, Republicans were optimistic, in a good position. The Safe Races North Dakota Races in Delaware, North Dakota, Oregon, Utah Republican incumbent Jack Dalrymple announced and Washington were widely considered safe for he would not run for another term as governor, the incumbent party. opening the seat up for a competitive Republican primary. North Dakota Attorney General Wayne Delaware Stenehjem received his party’s endorsement at Popular Democratic incumbent Jack Markell was the Republican Party convention, but multimil- term-limited after fulfilling his second term in office. lionaire Doug Burgum challenged Stenehjem in Former Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden, the primary despite losing the party endorsement. eldest son of former Vice President Joe Biden, was Lifelong North Dakota resident Burgum had once considered a shoo-in to succeed Markell before founded a software company, Great Plains Soft- a 2014 recurrence of brain cancer led him to stay ware, that was eventually purchased by Microsoft out of the race. -
Greening America's Capitals: Phoenix, Arizona 2012
Greening America’s Capitals U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2012 GREENING LOWER GRAND AVENUE Phoenix, Arizona Greening America's Capitals is a project of the Partnership for Sustainable Communities between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) to help state capitals develop an implementable vision of distinctive, environmentally friendly neighborhoods that incorporate innovative green building and green infrastructure strategies. EPA is providing this design assistance to help support sustainable communities that protect the environment, economy, and public health and to inspire state leaders to expand this work elsewhere. Greening America's Capitals will help communities consider ways to incorporate sustainable design strategies into their planning and development to create and enhance interesting, distinctive neighborhoods that have multiple social, economic, and environmental benefits. Phoenix, Arizona, was chosen in 2011 as one of five state capital cities to receive this assistance, along with Montgomery, Alabama; Jackson, Mississippi; Lincoln, Nebraska; and Washington, D.C. More information about Greening America’s Capitals is at http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/greencapitals.htm. GREENING LOWER GRAND AVENUE PHOENIX, ARIZONA TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................ i 1. INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................1 -
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
(1 of 432) Case:Case 18-15845,1:19-cv-01071-LY 01/27/2020, Document ID: 11574519, 41-1 FiledDktEntry: 01/29/20 123-1, Page Page 1 1 of of 432 239 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL No. 18-15845 COMMITTEE; DSCC, AKA Democratic Senatorial Campaign D.C. No. Committee; THE ARIZONA 2:16-cv-01065- DEMOCRATIC PARTY, DLR Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION KATIE HOBBS, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of Arizona; MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees, THE ARIZONA REPUBLICAN PARTY; BILL GATES, Councilman; SUZANNE KLAPP, Councilwoman; DEBBIE LESKO, Sen.; TONY RIVERO, Rep., Intervenor-Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding (2 of 432) Case:Case 18-15845,1:19-cv-01071-LY 01/27/2020, Document ID: 11574519, 41-1 FiledDktEntry: 01/29/20 123-1, Page Page 2 2 of of 432 239 2 DNC V. HOBBS Argued and Submitted En Banc March 27, 2019 San Francisco, California Filed January 27, 2020 Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge, and Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, William A. Fletcher, Marsha S. Berzon*, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Richard R. Clifton, Jay S. Bybee, Consuelo M. Callahan, Mary H. Murguia, Paul J. Watford, and John B. Owens, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge W. Fletcher; Concurrence by Judge Watford; Dissent by Judge O’Scannlain; Dissent by Judge Bybee * Judge Berzon was drawn to replace Judge Graber. Judge Berzon has read the briefs, reviewed the record, and watched the recording of oral argument held on March 27, 2019.