DOCSLIB.ORG

(CE:954B-958B) ENATON, THE, One of the Chief Monastic Centers of Byzantine and Medieval Egypt, Near Alexandria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(CE:954B-958B) ENATON, THE, One of the Chief Monastic Centers of Byzantine and Medieval Egypt, Near Alexandria (CE:954b-958b) ENATON, THE, one of the chief monastic centers of Byzantine and medieval Egypt, near Alexandria. It was called in Arabic Dayr al-Zujaj (Monastery of Glass) or Dayr al-Zajjaj (Monastery of the Glass Maker). Although the whole complex of monasteries at Enaton was completely ruined at the end of the Middle Ages, numerous Greek and Oriental sources give evidence of the high quality of its monastic life, the profundity of its religious conviction, and the distinction of many of its members. Location The Enaton (from the Greek ennea ["nine"]) derives its name from its location near the ninth milestone west of Alexandria on the coastal road to Libya. At the beginning of the twentieth century, archaeologists discovered funerary stelae, on which one of the monasteries of the complex appeared, and the remains of a church. As a consequence of those discoveries, the tendency is to locate the Enaton in the neighborhood of the present village of Dikhaylah, on the taenia (coastal strip) separating the sea from the western tongue of Lake Mareotis. But nothing is less certain, and the forceful discussion of the epigraphic data by E. Schwartz in the 1920s shows that Dikhaylah is more likely to be the site of the ancient monastery of the Pempton, and that we must look for the Enaton on the taenia but some miles west of Dikhaylah on Kom al-Zujaj. Like other communities on the taenia, the monastery had at its disposal a sea anchorage and access to the lake. These geographical features were favorable to the vitality of economic and religious relations. We must bear them in mind in the light of human factors when we examine the historical role of the Enaton. The Mareotis region, and the taenia in particular, was considerably more populated and more prosperous in late antiquity than it was only fifty years ago. Religious establishments abounded. Independently established but intimately linked with the Enaton were the Pempton, the Oktokaidekaton, the Eikoston, and others. Travelers and monks mingled on the coastal road and occasionally made a stop at the Enaton with their beasts. The monastery provided them with appropriate quarters for the night. On crossing the lagoon, travelers arrived in the rich domain of the sanctuary of Saint MENAS (see ABU MINA). The devotees of the great martyr could enhance their pilgrimage with a visit to the Enaton. Farther to the south lay the monasteries of Nitria, Kellia, and Scetis, whose relations with the Enaton are well recorded. Close by, to the east was the populous civil and religious metropolis of Alexandria. Even though the monks of the Enaton did not always have permission to go to town, news as well as local and foreign visitors circulated rapidly between the city and the monastery. Finally, beyond Alexandria there flourished the Metanoia, whose monks in the 480s lent assistance to "sympathizers" of the Enaton on the occasion of an expedition against a clandestine shrine of Isis at Menouthis. Origins The date and circumstances of the founding of the Enaton are utterly obscure. The Passion of Serapammon, bishop of Nikiou martyred under DIOCLETIAN, says that he embraced the monastic life there (Hyvernat, 1886-1887, pp. 304-333), which would date the first attestation of the monastery at the end of the third century or the beginning of the fourth. But the Passion is unreliable, so one hesitates to accept this testimony. More creditable is the Coptic Life of Longinus, a great figure of the Enaton, the historicity of which is not in doubt. This text presents a picture of a prosperous and celebrated Enaton in the mid-fifth century that has already existed for a long time, since there is reference to monks buried in its cemetery. But this does nothing to clarify the question of its origins. The Enaton at Its Height The period from the mid-fifth to the mid-seventh century, in the Byzantine period, was the most animated in the history of the Enaton. During that time its organization and monastic life are best known. Organization. The fact that the Enaton was called both a laura (a monastery in an Eastern church) and a monasterion ("monastery") should not mislead one into thinking of it as a single monastery. In fact, the Enaton was a conglomeration of autonomous establishments of varying size and population, sometimes no more than an isolated cell. These establishments also were called monasteria or above all koinobia (Latin, coenobium, or "monastery"). Each koinobion had its own church and holy men, who instructed disciples. The several koinobia of the Enaton were separately identified by a name which might recall that of a particular HEGUMENOS or PROESTOS or "father" or illustrious "cenobiarch," a personage sometimes confused with the founder himself. There were, for example, the koinobion of the cenobiarch Apa Gaius in the middle of the fifth century and that of Abba Salamah, known in 551 and again at the beginning of the seventh century; the eponymous head of that koinobion is perhaps the "great Solomon" mentioned about 482 to 489 in the Life of Severus (PO 2, 15, 24-27, 36 and 39). A number of other components of the Enaton are known. The Three Cells (end of the fifth century) was the dwelling place of the ascetic Abba Zenon. The Monastery of the Fathers was one of the most celebrated. The Monastery of the Epiphany appears about 567 to 569. The Koinobion of Tougara appears in the beginning of the seventh century. The Monastery of the Antonians appears about 615. There was also the Monastery of Dalmatia. Information about other monastic foundations at the Enaton is uncertain or confused. The Monastery of the Patrician founded in the reign of Justinian by the patrician lady Anastasia, friend of the theologian SEVERUS OF ANTIOCH, is placed at the Enaton by the Syriac Life of this lady and at the Pempton by the Greek versions. It is not improbable, however, that this monastery has been confused with the monastery of the patrician Caesaria, another friend of Severus, the exact location of which we do not know. There are still more uncertainties with regard to the various koinobia or monai mentioned by epigraphic material from Dikhaylah, such as those of Abba Eustathius, Abba John, or Zaston. Except for the koinobion of Abba Salamah mentioned above, there is nothing to prove that these monasteries were attached to the Enaton. Moreover, the koinobion of Maphora is placed by one source near the Oktokaidekaton and the Eikoston. According to the HISTORY OF THE PATRIARCHS, there were six hundred of these monasteries at the Enaton in the late sixth and early seventh centuries, but this figure is difficult to accept. According to the Arab Jacobite Synaxarion and the Ethiopian Synaxarion, this figure more likely refers to the total number of monasteries in the region of Alexandria. However that may be, the many establishments at the Enaton must have given it the appearance of a large town with irregular streets, houses with terraced roofs, and dogs running about. The Enaton was a sort of federal institution presided over by a hegumenos as the supreme authority and an assembly of the community. From the beginning of the seventh century there was also an oikonomos, or steward, which shows that the separate monasteries had common material interests. Nevertheless, we have only a very summary idea of their form and extent. The wealth of the Enaton was in any case considerable enough to have excited the greed of the Persians under archbishop Andronicus in the early seventh century. We can just see the part taken by the offerings in its constitution. Monastic Life. Life at the Enaton can be reconstructed with the aid of numerous edifying anecdotes. Certain features stand out. One is the large proportion of foreign-born monks. Apa Gaius, the hegumenos of the Enaton in the fifth century, was a Corinthian, and his disciple, the future hegumenos Longinus, came from Lycia (in Asia Minor), like his friend Lucius. Later there is reference to Carians and a Cilician. The strongest contingent, however, was from Syria and Palestine, which is explained by the proximity of these countries to Egypt and above all by a political and religious connection with Egypt. A second feature is the importance accorded, alongside asceticism and prayer, to manual work. As in many other Egyptian communities, the work was chiefly the production of baskets and rope. This practice gave rise, according to the Life of Longinus, to a regular commerce, notably with the seafarers, from which the monks derived some personal profits, which they could dispense as alms. A final feature is a high intellectual level. In the 480s the Enaton rivaled the philosophical school of Alexandria. The "great Solomon" taught there "the true philosophy" to an audience of educated disciples like the "sophist" Stephen and many students from Alexandria and elsewhere. These disciples then formed their own schools at the Enaton. According to John Moschus, the Enaton welcomed the "philosopher" Abba Theodorus. The theological erudition of Archbishop Damian, of Syrian origin and a former monk of the Enaton, is mentioned by several sources. One of the Enaton's finest claims to glory is to have been the setting in 615-616, at the Monastery of the Antonians, for the philological activity of two Syrians—Thomas of Harkel, bishop of Mabbug, made a collation of a Syriac translation of the New Testament with Greek manuscripts and Paul of Tella made a Syriac translation of the Septuagint after Origen's Hexapla. By a rare chance we possess several colophons of Syriac biblical manuscripts composed by these two scholars that mention the Enaton.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SYNAXARION, COPTO-ARABIC, List of Saints Used in the Coptic Church
    (CE:2171b-2190a) SYNAXARION, COPTO-ARABIC, list of saints used in the Coptic church. [This entry consists of two articles, Editions of the Synaxarion and The List of Saints.] Editions of the Synaxarion This book, which has become a liturgical book, is very important for the history of the Coptic church. It appears in two forms: the recension from Lower Egypt, which is the quasi-official book of the Coptic church from Alexandria to Aswan, and the recension from Upper Egypt. Egypt has long preserved this separation into two Egypts, Upper and Lower, and this division was translated into daily life through different usages, and in particular through different religious books. This book is the result of various endeavors, of which the Synaxarion itself speaks, for it mentions different usages here or there. It poses several questions that we cannot answer with any certainty: Who compiled the Synaxarion, and who was the first to take the initiative? Who made the final revision, and where was it done? It seems evident that the intention was to compile this book for the Coptic church in imitation of the Greek list of saints, and that the author or authors drew their inspiration from that work, for several notices are obviously taken from the Synaxarion called that of Constantinople. The reader may have recourse to several editions or translations, each of which has its advantages and its disadvantages. Let us take them in chronological order. The oldest translation (German) is that of the great German Arabist F. Wüstenfeld, who produced the edition with a German translation of part of al-Maqrizi's Khitat, concerning the Coptic church, under the title Macrizi's Geschichte der Copten (Göttingen, 1845).
    [Show full text]
  • Miracles of St. Eustratius of Mar Saba (Written Ca
    Chronos- Revue d’Histoire de l’Université de Balamand, is a bi-annual Journal published in three languages (Arabic, English and French). It deals particularly with the History of the ethnic and religious groups of the Arab world. Journal Name: Chronos ISSN: 1608-7526 Title: Unpublished Texts from the Arab Orthodox Tradition (2): Miracles of St. Eustratius of Mar Saba (written ca. 860) Author(s): Alexandre Treiger To cite this document: Treiger, A. (2018). Unpublished Texts from the Arab Orthodox Tradition (2): Miracles of St. Eustratius of Mar Saba (written ca. 860). Chronos, 33, 7-20. https://doi.org/10.31377/chr.v33i0.89 Permanent link to this document: DOI: https://doi.org/10.31377/chr.v33i0.89 Chronos uses the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-SA that lets you remix, transform, and build upon the material for non-commercial purposes. However, any derivative work must be licensed under the same license as the original. CHRONOS Re vue d' Histoire de l'U ni versite de Ba lamand Nu mero 33, 2016, ISSN 1608 7526 UNPUBLISHED TEXTS FROM THE ARAB ORTHODOX TRADITION (2): MIRACLES OF ST. EUSTRATIUS OF MAR SABA (WRITTEN ca. 860) ALEXANDER T REIGER' The purpose of the present article- the second instalment in the "Unpublished Texts from the Arab Orthodox Tradition" series- is to make accessible a hitherto neglected document from the Orthodox Christian tradition in Arabic: a brief account of the miracles of a little-known saint, SI. Eustratius of Mar Saba (first half of the ninth century), a disciple of the famous SI. Stephen of Mar Saba (d.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Named Mary in the Meadow of John Moschus
    chapter 7 What Happened to Mary? Women Named Mary in the Meadow of John Moschus Ulla Tervahauta Introduction The various Marys of the New Testament lived on in early and medieval Chris- tian traditions. Apocryphal texts portray Mary of Magdala as a teacher of the disciples or investigate the early years of Mary, Mother of God. New Marys also emerge, such as Mary of Egypt, to this day a popular saint in eastern orthodox Christianity. There are other stories that portray Marys and provide entertain- ment with a moral teaching. In this article, I discuss several Marys who appear in John Moschus’s Meadow, a collection of monastic stories originating from the late sixth to the early seventh century. These figures show how biblical and other literature was applied and turned into popular forms in the sixth cen- tury and onwards by Moschus and others. As outsiders from the male monastic perspective, the portrayal of these women enable us to explore questions of identity, gender, and inclusivity/exclusivity. I will approach the reception of biblical traditions and views towards women through three stories featuring a woman who is at some point named Mary. There is a Mary who murders her own children: this Christian Medea does not avenge a treacherous husband, but resorts to extreme violence because the man she would marry refuses to have a woman with another man’s children. She is punished by divine judgement. Second, a story of a prostitute, in some manuscripts named Mary, repents and becomes a nun. Her story builds on gospel narratives of Jesus’s encounters with various women, including the woman who anoints him.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marvellous Life of Patriarch Sophronius I
    A JOURNAL OF ORTHODOX FAITH AND CULTURE ROAD TO EMMAUS Help support Road to Emmaus Journal. The Road to Emmaus staff hopes that you find our journal inspiring and useful. While we offer our past articles on-line free of charge, we would warmly appreciate your help in covering the costs of producing this non-profit journal, so that we may continue to bring you quality articles on Orthodox Christianity, past and present, around the world. Thank you for your support. Please consider a donation to Road to Emmaus by visiting the Donate page on our website. THE MARVELOUS LIFE OF PATRIARCH SOPHRONIUS I His Company of Saints, and the Fall of Byzantine Jerusalem by Mother Nectaria McLees aint Sophronius of Jerusalem (c. 560-638, feast-day March 11) stands S among the most intriguing and attractive of Byzantine hierarchs, his eight decades encompassing a wealth of life experience as a highly-trained sophist, traveling ascetic pilgrim, esteemed church writer, and eventually patriarch. The monastic spiritual son and friend of two of the 6th-century’s great Christian luminaries, John Moschus (author of The Spiritual Mead- ow) and St. John the Almsgiver, Patriarch of Alexandria, St. Sophronius’ own spiritual son, St. Maximus the Confessor, would continue his life-long combat with heresy. An author of church services and hagiography, St. Sophronius is best-known as the author of the Life of St. Mary of Egypt, the only saint’s life read aloud as part of an official service in the yearly liturgical cycle of the Orthodox Church. This great hierarch ended his days as Patri- arch of the Holy City of Jerusalem, which, in the absence of higher political or military authority, he surrendered to Muslim conquerors in 638 to avert the destruction of the city and its population after a six-month siege.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 a Critical Edition of the Hexaplaric Fragments Of
    A CRITICAL EDITION OF THE HEXAPLARIC FRAGMENTS OF JOB 22-42 Introduction As a result of the Rich Seminar on the Hexapla in the summer of 1994 at Oxford, a decision was made to create a new collection and edition of all Hexaplaric fragments.1 Frederick Field was the last scholar to compile all known fragments in the mid to late 19th century,2 but by 1902, Henry Barclay Swete had announced that more hexaplaric materials were ―accumulating.‖3 These new materials need to be included in a new collection of hexaplaric fragments, a collection which is called ―a Field for the 21st century.‖4 With the publication of two-thirds of the critical editions of the Septuagint (LXX) by the Septuaginta-Unternehmen in Göttingen, the fulfillment of a new collection of all known hexaplaric fragments is becoming more feasible. Project 1 Alison Salvesen ed., Origen’s Hexapla and Fragments: Papers presented at the Rich Seminar on the Hexapla Oxford Centre for Hebrew and Jewish Studies, 25th-3rd August 1994 (Texte und Studien zum Antiken Judentum 58 Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1998), vi. 2 Frederick Field, Origenis Hexaplorum quae supersunt sive veterum interpretum graecorum in totum Vetus Testamentum fragmenta, 2 vols (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1875). 3 Henry Barclay Swete, An Introduction to the Old Testament in Greek (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1902. Reprint, Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2003), 76. 4 See http://www.hexapla.org/. Accessed on 3/20/2010. The Hexapla Institute is a reality despite Sydney Jellicoe‘s pessimism concerning a revised and enlarged edition of the hexaplaric fragments, which he did not think was in the ―foreseeable future.‖ Sidney Jellicoe, The Septuagint and Modern Study (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968), 129.
    [Show full text]
  • P.Grenf. 1.5, Origen, and the Scriptorium of Caesarea1
    Bulletin of the American Society of Papyrologists 52 (2015) 181-223 P.Grenf. 1.5, Origen, and the Scriptorium of Caesarea1 Francesca Schironi University of Michigan Abstract P.Grenf. 1.5, a fragment from a papyrus codex with Ezekiel 5:12-6:3, is here put in its historical context. Since it was written close to Origen’s own lifetime (185-254 CE), it provides early evidence about how he used critical signs in his editions of the Old Testament. It also sheds light on the work of the scriptorium of Caesarea half a century later. P.Grenf. 1.5 — P.Grenf. 1.5 and Origen’s critical signs — Hexaplaric Texts and P.Grenf. 1.5 — The “Revised” Edition of the Bible— P.Grenf. 1.5 and the Codex Marchalianus (Q)— Critical Signs in P.Grenf. 1.5 and Q —The Position of the Critical Signs in the “Revised” LXX Text — P.Grenf. 1.5 and Origen’s Work on the Bible — Conclusions P.Grenf. 1.5 (= Bodl. MS. Gr. bibl. d. 4 (P) = Van Haelst 0314 = Rahlfs 0922) is a fragment from a papyrus codex containing a passage from Ezekiel (5:12-6:3). After its publication by Grenfell in 1896,2 this papyrus has been included in the online repertoire of the Papyri from the Rise of Christianity in Egypt (PCE) at Macquarie University (section 24, item 332). However, to 1 I presented earlier versions of this paper at the 27th International Congress of Papy- rology, Warsaw, in July 2013, and at the SBL Annual Meeting, San Diego, in November 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • The Son of Man and the Ancient of Days Observations on the Early Christian Reception of Daniel 7
    The Son of Man and the Ancient of Days Observations on the Early Christian Reception of Daniel 7 Bogdan G. Bucur Duquesne University, Pittsburgh Abstract: The divergence between the two textual variants of Dan 7:13 (“Old Greek” and “Theodotion”) and their distinct ways of understanding the relationship between Daniel’s “Ancient of Days” and “Son of Man” is insufficiently studied by scholars of the Book of Daniel, and is neglected by translators of the LXX. This article offers a critical examination of the status quaestionis and a discussion of the exegetical, doctrinal, hymnographic, and iconographic productions illustrating the rich reception history of Daniel 7 in Late Antique and Medieval, especially Byzantine, Christianity. While one exegetical strand distinguishes between the Son of Man (identified as God the Son) and the Ancient of Days (identified as God the Father), an equally, if not more widespread and influential, interpretation views Jesus Christ as both “Son of Man” and “Ancient of Days.” The article argues against the thesis of a direct correlation between the two textual variants of Dan 7:13 and the two strands of its reception history. Introduction The Christian reception history of Daniel 7:13 is complicated by the existence of two authoritative Greek variants of this verse. The pages to follow review the state of scholarship and argue that this textual divergence actually had a minimal impact on the Wirkungsgeschichte of Dan 7:13. This article is also concerned with the best ways to describe the multi-layered reception history of Greek Daniel 7, its diverse modes of symbolisation and strategies of appropriating the sacred Scriptures of Israel as Christian Bible.
    [Show full text]
  • MIRACLES of ST. EUSTRATIUS of MAR SABA (WRITTEN Ca. 860)
    CHRONOS Re vue d' Histoire de l'U ni versite de Ba lamand Nu mero 33, 2016, ISSN 1608 7526 UNPUBLISHED TEXTS FROM THE ARAB ORTHODOX TRADITION (2): MIRACLES OF ST. EUSTRATIUS OF MAR SABA (WRITTEN ca. 860) ALEXANDER T REIGER' The purpose of the present article- the second instalment in the "Unpublished Texts from the Arab Orthodox Tradition" series- is to make accessible a hitherto neglected document from the Orthodox Christian tradition in Arabic: a brief account of the miracles of a little-known saint, SI. Eustratius of Mar Saba (first half of the ninth century), a disciple of the famous SI. Stephen of Mar Saba (d. 31 March 794AD)2 Leontius of Damascus' Life of St. Stephen of Mar Saba,' written ca. 81DAD,' provides the fo ll ow in g information about SI. Stephen's disci ple Eustratius: I Dalhousie University. 2 For the fi rst instalment of the series, see Treiger 2014 (cf. review by Panchenko 2014). An entry on the first of the lWO texts covered by the first im;talment- On the Origins o/the Term "Melkite" (re­ titled: A Narrative about Sophronill.\· 0/ Jerusalem, 'Umar ibn al-KhanCib, and rhe Term "Me/kite ")­ is fonhcoming in Christian-Muslim Relations." A Bibliographical History (it reports the di scovery of a second manuscript or thi s text- Damascus, Rum Orthodox Patriarchate 290 [year 16691, NO.4 [truncated at the end]). J Leontius' Life 0/ St. Stephen was original ly written in Greek (Leonti us or Damascus 1723) and was translated into Arabi c in 903AD at Mar Saba by Anba Vannah ibn I~!ifan al-FfikhOrT (the Arabic translation has been ed ited and translated into English by John C.
    [Show full text]
  • Severusofantioch
    Severus of Antioch His Life and Times Edited by John D’Alton Youhanna Youssef leiden | boston For use by the Author only | © 2016 Koninklijke Brill NV Contents Foreword vii Bishop Suriel Preface ix Bishop Mor Malatios Malki Malki Notes on Contributors xi Introduction xiv Severus of Antioch: Heir of Saint John Chrysostom? 1 Pauline Allen Se glorifier de sa ville et de son siège? La grandeur d’Antioche et le mépris des titres chez Sévère le Grand 14 Roger-Youssef Akhrass A Letter from the Orthodox Monasteries of the Orient Sent to Alexandria, Addressed to Severos 32 Sebastian P. Brock The Asceticism of Severus: An Analysis of Struggle in His Homily 18 on the “Forty Holy Martyrs” Compared to the Cappadocians and the Syrians 47 John D’Alton Quotations from the Works of St. Severus of Antioch in Peter of Callinicus’ magnum opus ‘Contra Damianum’ 65 Rifaat Ebied Severus of Antioch and Changing Miaphysite Attitudes toward Byzantium 124 Nestor Kavvadas The Doves of Antioch: Severus, Chalcedonians, Monothelites, and Iconoclasm 138 Ken Parry Severus of Antioch at the Crossroad of the Antiochene and Alexandrian Exegetical Tradition 160 René Roux For use by the Author only | © 2016 Koninklijke Brill NV vi contents Hymns of Severus of Antioch and the Coptic Theotokia 183 Youhanna Nessim Youssef Index 199 For use by the Author only | © 2016 Koninklijke Brill NV Hymns of Severus of Antioch and the Coptic Theotokia Youhanna Nessim Youssef Introduction Severus of Antioch has a special veneration in the Coptic Church.1 In previous studies, we highlighted the role of Severus of Antioch in the Coptic Theotokia,2 especially the homilies 14 and 67 which commemorate a local tradition of the visit of the Virgin Mary to Elisabeth.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Sophronius of Jerusalem
    Saint Sophronius of Jerusalem SAINT OF THE DAY 11-03-2020 The humble theologian and patriarch Saint Sophronius of Jerusalem (c. 560-638), who had the great merit of denouncing the Monothelite heresy and stood by his flock during the Islamic invasion of the Holy City, was born in Damascus, where early on he showed his talent in his studies. He travelled extensively from his early youth and soon met Giovanni Mosco, a Byzantine writer and monk, who became his great friend and spiritual guide. Around 580 they travelled together to Egypt, where Sophronius led an ascetic life, studied philosophy and began to have serious eye problems, from which he recovered thanks to the intercession of the Alexandrian martyrs Cyrus and John. Out of gratitude he compiled a collection of 70 miracles attributed to the two saints. He became a monk in the monastery of St. Theodosius, not far from Bethlehem, and lived there for some time. He then devoted himself to various missions between Asia Minor and North Africa to combat Monophysitism (the heresy that attributed only divine nature to Jesus) and to teach the correct doctrine on the two natures - human and divine - existing in the one person of Christ, solemnly defined at the Council of Chalcedon in 451. Because of the advance of the Persians into Palestine and Egypt, the saint sought refuge in Rome with John Moschus, who died there some years later, in 619, and asked him to bury his body on Mount Sinai or in the Holy Land. Sophronius thus returned to the East and buried his friend at the monastery of Saint Theodosius, during a historical and religious era that was becoming increasingly intricate.
    [Show full text]
  • John of Damascus and the Consolidation of Classical Christian Demonology
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Dissertations (1934 -) Projects Imagining Demons in Post-Byzantine Jerusalem: John of Damascus and the Consolidation of Classical Christian Demonology Nathaniel Ogden Kidd Marquette University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Kidd, Nathaniel Ogden, "Imagining Demons in Post-Byzantine Jerusalem: John of Damascus and the Consolidation of Classical Christian Demonology" (2018). Dissertations (1934 -). 839. https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/839 IMAGINING DEMONS IN POST-BYZANTINE JERUSALEM: JOHN OF DAMASCUS AND THE CONSOLIDATION OF CLASSICAL CHRISTIAN DEMONOLOGY by The Rev. Nathaniel Ogden Kidd, B.A., M.Div A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin December, 2018 ABSTRACT IMAGINING DEMONS IN POST-BYZANTINE JERUSALEM: JOHN OF DAMASCUS AND THE CONSOLIDATION OF CLASSICAL CHRISTIAN DEMONOLOGY The Rev. Nathaniel Ogden Kidd, B.A., M.Div Marquette University, 2018 This dissertation traces the consolidation of a classical Christian framework for demonology in the theological corpus of John of Damascus (c. 675 – c. 750), an eighth century Greek theologian writing in Jerusalem. When the Damascene sat down to write, I argue, there was a great variety of demonological options available to him, both in the depth of the Christian tradition, and in the ambient local imagination. John’s genius lies first in what he chose not to include, but second in his ability to synthesize a minimalistic demonology out of a complex body of material and integrate it into a broader theological system.
    [Show full text]
  • L'épitaphe De Duhëla Sb Iii 6249: Moines Gaïanites Dans Des Monastères Alexandrins
    The Journal of Juristic Papyrology Vol. XXVIII, 1998, pp. 55-69 Adam Łajtar Ewa Wipszycka L'ÉPITAPHE DE DUHËLA SB III 6249: MOINES GAÏANITES DANS DES MONASTÈRES ALEXANDRINS 1 est bien connu qu'Alexandrie, dans l'antiquité tardive, était entourée d'un Jdense réseau de monastères. Ils étaient particulièrement nombreux à l'ouest de la ville, sur l'étroite bande de terre (ταινία, en latin taenia) qui séparait le lac Maréotis de la Méditerranée, le long de la route qui menait d'Alexandrie au grand centre de pèlerinage d'Abu Mina et vers la Libye. C'est là que se trou- vaient, parmi d'autres, les célèbres centres monastiques Pempton, Enaton (ou Ennaton), Oktokaidekaton et Eikoston, ainsi appelés parce qu'ils étaient situés, respectivement, près de la cinquième, de la neuvième, de la dix-huitième et de la vingtième pierre milliaire du cursus publicus.1 Les centres monastiques de la taenia alexandrine sont connus surtout grâce à des textes littéraires et para-littéraires. La documentation papyrologique est à peu près inexistante, ce qui est normal pour une localité de la Basse Egypte. On dispose en revanche de données archéologiques et, pour un centre monastique qui a dû être situé près de la localité moderne de Duhëla, d'un groupe im- portant d'inscriptions. Ad-Duhëla se trouve à une dizaine de km à l'ouest du centre d'Alexandrie, à la hauteur d'Agami, à peu près à l'endroit de l'antique Plinthinè. C'était jadis un village, mais depuis longtemps, c'est un faubourg d'Alexandrie. Au début du XXe siècle, dans cette localité, à 500 m au sud-est de la gare de chemin de 1 Au sujet de ces centres, voir les articles de J.
    [Show full text]