MMWR, Volume 70, Issue 30 — July 30, 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MMWR, Volume 70, Issue 30 — July 30, 2021 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Weekly / Vol. 70 / No. 30 July 30, 2021 Progress Toward Hepatitis B Control — World Health Organization European Region, 2016–2019 Nino Khetsuriani, MD, PhD1; Liudmila Mosina, MD2; Pierre Van Damme, MD, PhD3; Antons Mozalevskis, MD4; Siddhartha Datta, MD2; Rania A. Tohme, MD1 In 2019, an estimated 14 million persons in the World Health newborns. In addition, 35 (73%) of the 48 countries with uni- Organization (WHO) European Region* (EUR) were chroni- versal infant HepB vaccination reached ≥90% HepB3 coverage cally infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), and approximately annually during 2017–2019, and 19 (83%) of the 23 countries 43,000 of these persons died from complications of chronic HBV with universal birth dose administration achieved ≥90% timely infection (1). In 2016, the WHO Regional Office for Europe set HepB-BD coverage¶ annually during that period. Antenatal hepatitis B control program targets for 2020, including 1) ≥90% hepatitis B screening coverage was ≥90% in 17 (57%) of coverage with 3 doses of hepatitis B vaccine (HepB3), 2) ≥90% 30 countries that selectively provided HepB-BD to infants born coverage with interventions to prevent mother-to-child trans- to mothers with positive HBsAg test results. In January 2020, mission (MTCT) of HBV,† and 3) ≤0.5% prevalence of HBV Italy and the Netherlands became the first counties in EUR to surface antigen (HBsAg)§ in age groups eligible for vaccination be validated to have achieved the regional hepatitis B control with hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) (2–4). This report describes targets. Countries can accelerate progress toward hepatitis B the progress made toward hepatitis B control in EUR during control by improving coverage with HepB and interventions to 2016–2019. By December 2019, 50 (94%) of 53 countries in EUR provided routine vaccination with HepB to all infants or ¶ A timely HepB birth dose is defined as a dose administered within 24 hours of birth. children aged 1–12 years (universal HepB), including 23 (43%) countries that offered hepatitis B birth dose (HepB-BD) to all INSIDE * EUR is one of six WHO regions and consists of the following 53 member states (total population, approximately 932 million): Albania, Andorra, 1036 Disparities in COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Among Health Care Personnel Working in Long- Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Kazakhstan, Term Care Facilities, by Job Category, National Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Moldova, Monaco, Healthcare Safety Network — United States, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, March 2021 Romania, Russia, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, United Kingdom, 1040 SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Public School District and Uzbekistan. Employees Following a District-Wide Vaccination † In EUR, interventions to prevent MTCT of HBV include either Program — Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, 1) administering a timely birth dose of HepB vaccine to all newborns (universal March 21–April 23, 2021 birth dose policy) or 2) conducting routine antenatal screening of pregnant women for hepatitis B and vaccinating infants born to HBV-infected mothers 1044 Guidance for Implementing COVID-19 Prevention with HepB birth dose within 24 hours of birth (selective birth dose policy), Strategies in the Context of Varying Community either of which is followed by ≥2 additional vaccine doses according to the Transmission Levels and Vaccination Coverage national immunization schedule. In addition, some countries provide antiviral treatment to pregnant women with positive HBsAg test results and administer 1048 QuickStats hepatitis B immune globulin at birth to infants of infected mothers. § Before introduction of vaccination, the HBV endemicity in EUR, defined by HBsAg antigen seroprevalence, ranged widely from low (<2.0%) in Continuing Education examination available at 25 countries, to intermediate (2.0%–7.9%) in 25 countries, to high (≥8.0%) https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/mmwr_continuingEducation.html in three countries. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report prevent MTCT and documenting achievement of the HBsAg with positive HBsAg test results. During 2016–2019, regional seroprevalence target through representative serosurveys or, in HepB3 coverage increased from 82% to 92%, partly because low-endemicity countries, antenatal screening. three more countries (Norway, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom)¶¶ introduced universal infant HepB vaccination Immunization Activities during 2017–2018. Among the countries that provided uni- As a major intervention to prevent perinatal and childhood versal infant HepB vaccination, those that reported ≥90% hepatitis B infections, WHO recommends that all infants HepB3 coverage among infants increased from 37 (82%) of receive ≥3 doses of HepB, including a timely birth dose (5). 45 countries during 2016–2017 to 41 (85%) of 48 countries Most countries in EUR introduced HepB vaccination >15 years in 2019. However, HepB3 coverage was <90% for ≥3 years ago (Table 1). Countries report information on immuniza- during 2016–2019 in six countries.*** Of the 21 countries tion schedules and coverage annually to WHO and UNICEF with universal HepB-BD that reported birth dose coverage to using the WHO/UNICEF Joint Reporting Form. WHO and WHO,††† coverage with timely HepB-BD during 2016–2019 UNICEF review administrative coverage data and surveys to was ≥90% in 2019–2020 (90%–95%). generate country-specific coverage estimates.** In 2019, 48 (91%) of the 53 countries in EUR provided Antenatal Screening and Postexposure universal routine infant HepB vaccination, two†† (4%) Prophylaxis (Hungary and Slovenia) provided universal routine HepB The 30 countries that implement a selective HepB-BD policy vaccination to children aged 5–12 years, and three countries aim to prevent MTCT of HBV infection through antenatal (6%) (Denmark, Finland, and Iceland) implemented selective HBV screening combined with postexposure prophylaxis of HepB vaccination, only immunizing those born to moth- infants born to mothers with positive HBsAg test results. ers with positive HBsAg test results.§§ Twenty-three (43%) Information on implementation of these interventions is not countries provided HepB-BD to all newborns, and 30 (57%) routinely reported to WHO. Based on the responses to a sur- provided HepB-BD selectively to children born to mothers vey conducted by the WHO Regional Office for Europe in ** https://immunizationdata.who.int/listing.html?topic = coverage&location = eur ¶¶ Norway and the United Kingdom in 2017, and Switzerland in 2018. †† In Hungary, HepB is given at age 12 years, and in Slovenia, it is given at age 5–6 years. *** Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Germany, Montenegro, San Marino, and §§ All countries are in northern Europe and have historically had very low Ukraine. HBV endemicity. ††† Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russia do not report HepB-BD coverage. The MMWR series of publications is published by the Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA 30329-4027. Suggested citation: [Author names; first three, then et al., if more than six.] [Report title]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021;70:[inclusive page numbers]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Rochelle P. Walensky, MD, MPH, Director Debra Houry, MD, MPH, Acting Principal Deputy Director Daniel B. Jernigan, MD, MPH, Acting Deputy Director for Public Health Science and Surveillance Rebecca Bunnell, PhD, MEd, Director, Office of Science Jennifer Layden, MD, PhD, Deputy Director, Office of Science Michael F. Iademarco, MD, MPH, Director, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services MMWR Editorial and Production Staff (Weekly) Charlotte K. Kent, PhD, MPH, Editor in Chief Martha F. Boyd, Lead Visual Information Specialist Ian Branam, MA, Ginger Redmon, MA, Jacqueline Gindler, MD, Editor Alexander J. Gottardy, Maureen A. Leahy, Co-Acting Lead Health Communication Specialists Brian A. King, PhD, MPH, Guest Science Editor Julia C. Martinroe, Stephen R. Spriggs, Tong Yang, Shelton Bartley, MPH, Paul Z. Siegel, MD, MPH, Associate Editor Visual Information Specialists Lowery Johnson, Amanda Ray, Mary Dott, MD, MPH, Online Editor Quang M. Doan, MBA, Phyllis H. King, Jacqueline N. Sanchez, MS, Terisa F. Rutledge, Managing Editor Terraye M. Starr, Moua Yang, Health Communication Specialists Teresa M. Hood, MS, Lead Technical Writer-Editor Information Technology Specialists Will Yang, MA, Leigh Berdon, Glenn Damon, Soumya Dunworth, PhD, Visual Information Specialist Srila Sen, MA, Stacy Simon, MA, Jeffrey D. Sokolow, MA, Technical Writer-Editors MMWR Editorial Board Timothy F. Jones, MD, Chairman Matthew L. Boulton, MD, MPH William E. Halperin, MD, DrPH, MPH Carlos Roig, MS, MA Carolyn Brooks, ScD, MA Jewel Mullen, MD, MPH, MPA William Schaffner, MD Jay C. Butler, MD Jeff Niederdeppe, PhD Nathaniel Smith, MD, MPH Virginia A. Caine, MD Celeste Philip, MD, MPH Morgan Bobb Swanson, BS Jonathan E. Fielding, MD, MPH, MBA Patricia Quinlisk, MD, MPH Abbigail Tumpey, MPH David W. Fleming, MD Patrick L. Remington, MD, MPH 1030 MMWR / July
Recommended publications
  • Thursday Calendar 20142018
    THURSDAY Five-Year Calendar Unit 2014 20152016 2017 2018 Week # 1 Jan. 2 - Jan. 9 Jan. 1 - Jan. 8 Jan. 7 - Jan. 14 Jan. 5 - Jan. 12 Jan. 4 - Jan. 11 2 Jan. 9 - Jan. 16 Jan. 8 - Jan. 15 Jan. 14 - Jan. 21 Jan. 12 - Jan. 19 Jan. 11 - Jan. 18 3 Jan. 16 - Jan. 23 Jan. 15 - Jan. 22 Jan. 21 - Jan 28 Jan. 19 - Jan. 26 Jan. 18 - Jan. 25 4 Jan. 23 - Jan. 30 Jan. 22 - Jan. 29 Jan. 28 - Feb. 4 Jan. 26 - Feb. 2 Jan. 25 - Feb. 1 5 Jan. 30 - Feb. 6 Jan. 29 - Feb. 5 Feb. 4 - Feb. 11 Feb. 2- Feb. 9 Feb. 1 - Feb. 8 6 Feb. 6 - Feb. 13 Feb. 5 - Feb. 12 Feb. 11 - Feb. 18 Feb. 9 - Feb. 16 Feb. 8 - Feb. 15 7 Feb. 13 - Feb. 20 Feb. 12 - Feb. 19 Feb. 18 - Feb. 25 Feb. 16 - Feb. 23 Feb. 15 - Feb. 22 8 Feb. 20 - Feb. 27 Feb. 19 - Feb. 26 Feb. 25 - Mar. 3 Feb. 23 - Mar. 2 Feb. 22 - Mar. 1 9 Feb. 27 - Mar. 6 Feb. 26 - Mar. 5 Mar. 3 - Mar. 10 Mar. 2 - Mar. 9 Mar. 1 - Mar. 8 10 Mar. 6 - Mar. 13 Mar. 5 - Mar. 12 Mar. 10 - Mar. 17 Mar. 9 - Mar. 16 Mar. 5 - Mar. 15 11 Mar. 13 - Mar. 20 Mar. 12 - Mar. 19 Mar. 17 - Mar. 24 Mar. 16 - Mar. 23 Mar. 15 - Mar. 22 12 Mar. 20 - Mar. 27 Mar. 19 - Mar. 26 Mar. 24 - Mar. 31 Mar. 23 - Mar. 30 Mar. 22 - Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hexavalent Dtap/IPV/Hib/Hepb Combination Vaccine: Information for Healthcare Practitioners About the Neonatal Selective
    The hexavalent DTaP/IPV/Hib/HepB combination vaccine Information for healthcare practitioners about the neonatal selective immunisation programme for babies at risk of hepatitis B The Hexavalent DTaP/IPV/Hib/HepB combination vaccine: Information for Healthcare Practitioners (selective programme) About Public Health England Public Health England exists to protect and improve the nation’s health and wellbeing, and reduce health inequalities. We do this through world-leading science, research, knowledge and intelligence, advocacy, partnerships and the delivery of specialist public health services. We are an executive agency of the Department of Health and Social Care, and a distinct delivery organisation with operational autonomy. We provide government, local government, the NHS, Parliament, industry and the public with evidence-based professional, scientific and delivery expertise and support. Public Health England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG Tel: 020 7654 8000 www.gov.uk/phe Twitter: @PHE_uk Facebook: www.facebook.com/PublicHealthEngland For queries relating to this document, please contact: [email protected] © Crown copyright 2020 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0. To view this licence, visit OGL. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. First published November 2017 This updated version published February
    [Show full text]
  • Download File (Pdf)
    2021 FORUM REPORT COVID-19 in Africa one year on: Impact and Prospects MO IBRAHIM FOUNDATION 2021 FORUM REPORT COVID-19 in Africa one year on: Impact and Prospects MO IBRAHIM FOUNDATION Foreword by Mo Ibrahim Notwithstanding these measures, on current projections Founder and Chair of the Mo Ibrahim Africa might not be adequately covered before 2023. Foundation (MIF) Vaccinating Africa is an urgent matter of global security and all the generous commitments made by Africa’s partners must now be delivered. Looking ahead - and inevitably there will be future pandemics - Africa needs to significantly enhance its Over a year ago, the emergence and the spread of COVID-19 homegrown vaccine manufacturing capacity. shook the world and changed life as we knew it. Planes were Africa’s progress towards its development agendas was off grounded, borders were closed, cities were shut down and course even before COVID-19 hit and recent events have people were told to stay at home. Other regions were hit created new setbacks for human development. With very earlier and harder, but Africa has not been spared from the limited access to remote learning, Africa’s youth missed out pandemic and its impact. on seven months of schooling. Women and girls especially The 2021 Ibrahim Forum Report provides a comprehensive are facing increased vulnerabilities, including rising gender- analysis of this impact from the perspectives of health, based violence. society, politics, and economics. Informed by the latest data, The strong economic and social impacts of the pandemic it sets out the challenges exposed by the pandemic and the are likely to create new triggers for instability and insecurity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hepatitis B Vaccine Is the Most Widely Used Vaccine in the World, with Over 1 Billion Doses Given
    Hepatitis B Vaccine Protect Yourself and Those You Love What is Hepatitis B? Hepatitis B is the most common serious liver infection in the world. It is caused by the hepatitis B virus (HBV), which attacks liver cells and can lead to liver failure, cirrhosis (scarring), or liver cancer later in life. The virus is transmitted through direct contact with infected blood and bodily fluids, and from an infected woman to her newborn at birth. Is there a safe vaccine for hepatitis B? YES! The good news is that there is a safe and effective vaccine for hepatitis B. The vaccine is a series, typically given as three shots over a six-month period that will provide a lifetime of protection. You cannot get hepatitis B from the vaccine – there is no human blood or live virus in the vaccine. The hepatitis B vaccine is the most widely used vaccine in the world, with over 1 billion doses given. The hepatitis B vaccine is the first "anti-cancer" vaccine because it can help prevent liver cancer! Who should be vaccinated against hepatitis B? The World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend the hepatitis B vaccine for all newborns and children up to 18 years of age, and all high-risk adults. All infants should receive the first dose of the vaccine in the delivery room or in the first 24 hours of life, preferably within 12 hours. (CDC recommends the first dose within 12 hours vs. the WHO recommendation of 24 hours.) The HBV vaccine is recommended to anyone who is at high risk of infection.
    [Show full text]
  • Engerix-B Data Sheet
    NEW ZEALAND DATA SHEET 1. PRODUCT NAME ENGERIX-B 20 micrograms/mL, suspension for injection. ENGERIX-B paediatric 10 micrograms/0.5 mL, suspension for injection. 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION ENGERIX-B paediatric dose: 10 microgram (µg) dose vaccine 1 dose (0.5 mL) contains: Hepatitis B surface antigen 1, 2 10 micrograms 1Adsorbed on aluminium hydroxide, hydrated Total: 0.25 milligrams Al3+ 2Produced in yeast cells (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) by recombinant DNA technology ENGERIX-B: 20 microgram (µg) dose vaccine 1 dose (1 mL) contains: Hepatitis B surface antigen1, 2 20 micrograms 1Adsorbed on aluminium hydroxide, hydrated Total: 0.50 milligrams Al3+ 2Produced in yeast cells (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) by recombinant DNA technology The vaccine is highly purified, and meets the WHO requirements for recombinant hepatitis B vaccines. No substances of human origin are used in its manufacture. For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1 List of excipients. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Suspension for injection. ENGERIX-B is a turbid white suspension. Upon storage, a fine white deposit with a clear colourless supernatant may be observed. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications ENGERIX-B is indicated for active immunisation against hepatitis B virus infection. As part of the national immunisation schedule, the New Zealand Ministry of Health* recommend all infants, unvaccinated children up to the age of 16 years, and household and sexual contacts of known hepatitis B carriers receive a primary course of vaccination against hepatitis B. 1 Immunisation is also recommended for seronegative persons who are at substantial risk and have been demonstrated or judged to be susceptible to the hepatitis B virus (HBV).
    [Show full text]
  • UNICEF Pentavalent-Hexa 2021+ Pre-Tender Industry Consultation
    UNICEF Pentavalent-Hexa 2021+ Pre-Tender Industry Consultation 19th SEPTEMBER 2019 1 Presentation Outline 1. Context ▪ Gavi Board decision ▪ Hexa strategic alignment ▪ Value Based Assessment 2. Demand scenarios and assumptions 3. Pentavalent Tender: ▪ Objectives ▪ Scope ▪ Duration ▪ Modality 4. Summary of feedback and response to questionnaire 5. Timelines 1. CONTEXT Gavi Board decision Hexa strategic alignment Value Based Assessment 3 Gavi Board November 2018 – Decisions IPV Post-2020 DTP booster VIS 2018 VIS 2018 + Hexavalent as immunisation option • Approved support for D, T & P vaccines (Td, DTwP, pentavalent) to be used as booster doses beginning in 2021 • Approved support for inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV), with country financing arrangements subject to alignment with the final parameter setting for Gavi 5.0 at the June 2019 Board meeting* • Approved in principle support of wP-Hexavalent vaccine, subject to a vaccine being licenced, recommended for use by WHO, WHO pre-qualified and that market attributes support the successful implementation of Hexavalent The development of capacity for standalone IPV remains the main priority for Gavi Alliance as part of the effort to eradicate polio All Gavi Board decisions are “subject to the availability of funding for the 2021-2025 period and alignment with the final parameter setting for Gavi 5.0 at the June 2019 Board meeting.” *Gavi's Board approved IPV co-financing arrangements post-2020 in its June 2019 session 4 Conditions to open a funding window for Hexavalent Condition 1: Hexavalent vaccines that are candidates for Gavi support should achieve IPV immunogenicity targets as per WHO’s SAGE recommendations. Condition 2: Hexavalent vaccines are priced in line with value-based principles.
    [Show full text]
  • HEAT WAVES Albany, New York Since 1874 Periods of 3 Or More Consecutive Days with Maximum Temperatures of 90 Degrees Or More
    HEAT WAVES Albany, New York Since 1874 Periods of 3 or more consecutive days with maximum temperatures of 90 degrees or more. 10 days August 9-11, 1893 June 26-28, 1953 Aug 27-Sep 5, 1953 4 days June 16-18, 1894 June 20-22, 1954 July 25-28, 1882 9 days July 30-August 2, 1887 August 4-12, 1896 May 30-June 2, 1895 July 18-20, 1894 July 8-10, 1955 August 18-21, 1899 July 27-29, 1894 July 21-23, 1955 8 days July 9-12, 1911 September 21-23, 1895 August 20-22, 1955 June 26-July 3, 1901 July 30-August 2, 1917 July 28-30, 1896 June 13-15, 1956 July 3-10, 1912 July 26-29, 1918 July 5-7, 1897 July 19-21, 1957 July 31-August 7, 1955 July 25-28, 1921 June 5-7, 1899 July 22-24, 1959 July 12-15, 1927 August 9-11, 1900 July 28-30, 1959 7 days July 29-August 1, 1933 August 25-27, 1900 May 18-20, 1962 July 14-16, 1901 June 30-July 2, 1963 August 17-23, 1916 June 28-July 1, 1947 July 17-19, 1905 July 17-19, 1963 July 5-11, 1988 August 8-11, 1949 July 5-7, 1908 July 17-19, 1964 July 17-23, 1991 July 12-15, 1952 August 16-18, 1913 July 21-23, 1964 July 16-19, 1953 August 8-10, 1914 July 27-29, 1964 6 days June 15-18, 1957 August 14-17, 1959 September 21-23, 1914 August 14-16, 1970 June 29-July 4, 1887 September 1-4, 1961 July 21-23, 1918 July 7-9, 1973 July 24-29, 1892 June 25-28, 1963 August 12-14, 1918 July 13-15, 1979 June 3-8, 1925 July 10-13, 1966 June 3-5, 1919 July 2-4, 1983 July 7-12, 1936 July 27-30, 1970 June 21-23, 1921 June 13-15, 1988 July 7-12, 1944 August 28-31, 1973 June 19-21, 1923 July 25-27, 1989 July 24-29, 1963 September 2-5, 1973 July
    [Show full text]
  • Case Studies Controversies in Vaccination
    European Review, Vol. 21, No. S1, S56–S61 r 2013 Academia Europæa. The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license ,http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.. doi:10.1017/S1062798713000227 Session 3 – Case Studies Controversies in Vaccination ROMAN PRYMULA University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Sokolska 581, 500 05 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected] Infectious diseases still jeopardize human health and even lives. In spite of the variety of advanced treatment methods, prevention is considered to be the most effective way to fight infections, and vaccination, no doubt, is one of the most effective preventive measures in the history of mankind. The vaccine controversy is based on a dispute over morality, ethics, effectiveness, and/or safety. There is no 100% safe or effective vaccine; however, benefits clearly overweigh risks. Ironically, as the numbers of cases of vaccine- preventable infectious diseases are falling, the controversies relating to vaccine safety are growing. Vaccines are generally victims of their own success. Controversies can afflict the positive acceptance of immunization, decrease the coverage and uptake and finally threaten the health of children and adults. The advent of vaccination has proven to be one of the most effective preventive measures in the history of medicine. Vaccines play a significant role in the prevention of debili- tating and, in many cases, life-threatening infectious diseases. Vaccines also provide important benefits in terms of reducing or avoiding costs associated with illness, both direct and indirect. In spite of the absence of any kind of ideal global healthcare system and lack of resources, the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) were able, in 1974, to establish a major global project called the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI).
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Unemployment Compensation Data
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DOES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF DAILY UNEMPLOYMENT EMPLOYMENT SERVICES COMPENSATION DATA Preliminary numbers as of March 4, 2021.* Telephone Date Online Claims Daily Total Running Total Claims March 13, 2020 310 105 415 415 March 14, 2020 213 213 628 March 15, 2020 410 410 1,038 March 16, 2020 1,599 158 1,757 2,795 March 17, 2020 2,541 219 2,760 5,555 March 18, 2020 2,740 187 2,927 8,482 March 19, 2020 2,586 216 2,802 11,284 March 20, 2020 2,726 205 2,931 14,215 March 21, 2020 1,466 1,466 15,681 March 22, 2020 1,240 1,240 16,921 March 23, 2020 2,516 296 2,812 19,733 March 24, 2020 2,156 236 2.392 22,125 March 25, 2020 2,684 176 2,860 24,985 March 26, 2020 2,842 148 2,990 27,975 March 27, 2020 2,642 157 2,799 30,774 March 28, 2020 1,666 25 1,691 32,465 March 29, 2020 1,547 1,547 34,012 March 30, 2020 2,831 186 3,017 37,029 March, 31, 2020 2,878 186 3,064 40,093 April 1, 2020 2,569 186 2,765 42,858 April 2, 2020 2,499 150 2,649 45,507 April 3, 2020 2,071 300 2,371 47,878 April 4, 2020 1,067 14 1,081 48,959 April 5, 2020 1,020 1,020 49,979 April 6, 2020 2,098 155 2,253 52,232 April 7, 2020 1,642 143 1,715 54,017 April 8, 2020 1,486 142 1,628 55,645 *Recalculated and updated daily DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Telephone DODISTRICT OF CEOLUMBIASDate Online Claims Daily Total Running Total DEPARTMENT OF DAILY UNEMPLOYMENTClaims EMPLOYMENT SERVICES April 9, 2020 1,604 111 1,715 57,360 April 10, 2020 COMPENSATION1,461 119 1,580 DATA58,940 April 11, 2020 763 14 777 59,717 April 12, 2020 698 698 60,415 April 13, 2020 1,499 104
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Dashboard - Thursday, July 30, 2020 Dashboard of Public Health Indicators
    7/30/2020 Duplicate of Public Health Indicators Massachusetts Department of Public Health COVID-19 Dashboard - Thursday, July 30, 2020 Dashboard of Public Health Indicators Newly Reported Total Confirmed Newly Reported Total Deaths Confirmed Cases Cases Deaths among among Confirmed Today* Confirmed Today Cases 304 109,400 15 8,375 New Individuals Total Individuals Below is the status as of June 5, 2020: Tested by Tested by Molecular Tests Molecular Tests Measure Status 12,224 1,161,454 COVID-19 positive test rate ⚫ Number of individuals who died from COVID-19 ⚫ Total Molecular Legend Number of patients with COVID-19 in hospitals ⚫ Tests Healthcare system readiness ⚫ Administered Testing capacity ⚫ 1,507,320 Contact tracing capabilities ⚫ *PLEASE NOTE: A technical reporting error by a hospital group caused a delay in its laboratory test results being reported to DPH. These newly reported test results have been included in today’s dashboard report and are reflected in today’s case totals. However, these positive test results have been assigned retrospectively to the appropriate date of test. The front page of the dashboard has been reformatted. Probable case and death information can be found on page 21. Antibody tests (individual and total numbers) can be found on page 7. For more information on the COVID-19 case definition, see https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.cste.org/resource/resmgr/2020ps/Interim-20-ID-01_COVID-19.pdf 1 1/1 7/30/2020 Public Health Indicators2 Massachusetts Department of Public Health COVID-19 Dashboard - Thursday, July 30,
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-2022 Custom & Standard Information Due Dates
    2021-2022 CUSTOM & STANDARD INFORMATION DUE DATES Desired Cover All Desired Cover All Delivery Date Info. Due Text Due Delivery Date Info. Due Text Due May 31 No Deliveries No Deliveries July 19 April 12 May 10 June 1 February 23 March 23 July 20 April 13 May 11 June 2 February 24 March 24 July 21 April 14 May 12 June 3 February 25 March 25 July 22 April 15 May 13 June 4 February 26 March 26 July 23 April 16 May 14 June 7 March 1 March 29 July 26 April 19 May 17 June 8 March 2 March 30 July 27 April 20 May 18 June 9 March 3 March 31 July 28 April 21 May 19 June 10 March 4 April 1 July 29 April 22 May 20 June 11 March 5 April 2 July 30 April 23 May 21 June 14 March 8 April 5 August 2 April 26 May 24 June 15 March 9 April 6 August 3 April 27 May 25 June 16 March 10 April 7 August 4 April 28 May 26 June 17 March 11 April 8 August 5 April 29 May 27 June 18 March 12 April 9 August 6 April 30 May 28 June 21 March 15 April 12 August 9 May 3 May 28 June 22 March 16 April 13 August 10 May 4 June 1 June 23 March 17 April 14 August 11 May 5 June 2 June 24 March 18 April 15 August 12 May 6 June 3 June 25 March 19 April 16 August 13 May 7 June 4 June 28 March 22 April 19 August 16 May 10 June 7 June 29 March 23 April 20 August 17 May 11 June 8 June 30 March 24 April 21 August 18 May 12 June 9 July 1 March 25 April 22 August 19 May 13 June 10 July 2 March 26 April 23 August 20 May 14 June 11 July 5 March 29 April 26 August 23 May 17 June 14 July 6 March 30 April 27 August 24 May 18 June 15 July 7 March 31 April 28 August 25 May 19 June 16 July 8 April 1 April 29 August 26 May 20 June 17 July 9 April 2 April 30 August 27 May 21 June 18 July 12 April 5 May 3 August 30 May 24 June 21 July 13 April 6 May 4 August 31 May 25 June 22 July 14 April 7 May 5 September 1 May 26 June 23 July 15 April 8 May 6 September 2 May 27 June 24 July 16 April 9 May 7 September 3 May 28 June 25.
    [Show full text]
  • Immunogenicity and Safety of a Fully Liquid Dtap-IPV-Hep B-PRP-T
    ccines & a V f V a o c l c i a n n a Lanata et al., J Vaccines Vaccin 2012, 3:1 r t u i o o n J Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination DOI: 10.4172/2157-7560.1000128 ISSN: 2157-7560 Research Article Open Access Immunogenicity and Safety of a Fully Liquid DTaP-IPV-Hep B-PRP-T Vaccine at 2-4-6 Months of Age in Peru Claudio Lanata1, Betzana Zambrano2, Lucie Ecker1, Isabel Amemiya1, Ana Gil1 and Eduardo Santos Lima3* 1Instituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima, Peru 2Sanofi Pasteur, Montevideo, Uruguay 3Clinical Development, Sanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France Abstract Objectives: To assess the immunogenicity and safety of a new candidate, fully liquid, hexavalent DTaP-IPV- Hep B-PRP-T vaccine (Hexaxim™, an AcXim family vaccine) compared to a licensed hexavalent DTaP-IPV-Hep B// PRP-T vaccine (Infanrix hexa®) in Peru. Methods: Infants born to HBsAg seronegative mothers and who had not received a hepatitis B vaccine prior to entry into the study were randomized to receive either Hexaxim™ (Group 1) or Infanrix hexa® (Group 2) at 2, 4, 6 months of age. Seroprotection (SP) rate for hepatitis B (anti-HBs antibody concentration ≥10 mIU/mL) was analysed for non-inferiority (Group 1 minus Group 2) 1 month post-primary series. Anti-diphtheria and anti-polyrosil ribitol phosphate (PRP) antibody responses were analysed descriptively. Safety was analysed from parental reports. Results: Seroprotection rate for anti-HBs antibody titers ≥10 mIU/mL was high in both groups (≥99.2%) and non-inferiority was demonstrated (lower bound of the 95% CI for the difference was -4.17, above the pre-defined delta [-10%]).
    [Show full text]