DOCSLIB.ORG

Banning Symbols of Extremism in Austria: Targeting Extremism Or Civil Society?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Banning Symbols of Extremism in Austria: Targeting Extremism Or Civil Society? NO: 49 PERSPECTIVE DECEMBER 2018 Banning Symbols of Extremism in Austria: Targeting Extremism or Civil Society? FARID HAFEZ • What is the Symbols Act pretending to fight? • Which forms of “extremism” are ignored? • Who is the act targeting? • What are the act’s possible long-time impacts? INTRODUCTION is framed as a measure to protect Muslim girls from The Republic of Austria is currently governed by a co- premature sexualization. As the responses of the oppo- alition formed by the Christian democratic-conserva- sition show, this strategy works. One strategy is to pre- tive Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) and the radical right tend to fight “political Islam,” thus not acting against Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ). Both ministries that Islam and Muslims, but against the “politicized ver- are home to the three secret services (one belonging to sion of Islam.” In this vein, is the Symbols Act serving the Ministry of Interior and two to the Defense Min- what it pretends to deliver? Is really every form of “ex- istry) are in the hands of the radical right FPÖ. Cur- tremism” challenged? Who is the act really targeting rently, the minister of interior is facing huge criticism and what are its possible long-time impacts? after the opposition parties questioned an initiative to illegally dismiss the head of the Federal Office for the WHAT IS THE SYMBOLS Protection of the Constitution and Counterterrorism ACT PRETENDING TO FIGHT? (BVT) and for infiltrating the latter with staff with a After World War II, Austria outlawed symbols of neo-Nazi background.1 National Socialism by issuing the Prohibition Act of Given the stark Islamophobic election campaigns 1947. Following the rise of DAESH, 70 years later, this by both parties, the coalition is now delivering what ban was extended to other groups by issuing a new act. it promised to its electorate. But the government – The coalition formed by the conservative ÖVP and the Social Democrats outlawed the use of the symbols of especially under the leadership of Sebastian Kurz’s Al-Qaida and DAESH in 2014. The new legislation, New ÖVP – tries to frame its discriminatory politics which will be passed in parliament in mid-December towards Muslims in an acceptable way in order to this year, extended the ban to the following groups gain maximum public support and to minimize resis- legitimizing it as an offense on extremist groups: the tance in the opposition parties. Hence, the Hijab ban Marxist Kurdistan Workers’ Party, PKK; HAMAS, the 1 Die Presse: BVT-Affäre: Vorwürfe der NS-Wiederbetätigung, November military part of Hizbullah; the Muslim Brotherhood; 4, 2018, https://diepresse.com/home/innenpolitik/5524032/BVTAffaere_ Vorwuerfe-der-NSWiederbetaetigung the Turkish nationalist “Grey Wolves”; the Croatian Farid Hafez Farid Hafez is a senior research scholar at the Bridge Initiative at Georgetown University and a senior research fellow at Salzburg University. PERSPECTIVE fascist Ustashe: and organizations which are declared ex-Nazis and that tries hard to reposition itself as as terrorist by EU legal acts. The interior minister pro-Jewish, anti-anti-Semitic and purely Islam- claims, “The symbols and gestures of the organizations ophobic.3 Also, people using the banned symbols mentioned in the amended law are against the consti- can be fined up to 4,000 euros and 10,000 in case tution and contradict our basic democratic values.”2 of repetition, while using banned traditional Nazi There are at least three interesting aspects in the symbols carries a maximum fine of 4,000 euros. expansion of the names now included in the act. A very important detail of this legislation states 1. Organizations that are defined as terrorist – be that the minister of interior can at any time ex- it on a national or on a European level like the pand this list to other groups by mere decree. Ac- PKK – are included alongside organizations that cording to Article 1.10, all groups, who are part are not declared as terrorist ones, like the Muslim or successor organizations of the aforementioned Brotherhood, which is not even deemed extremist can also be banned. This enables the minister to in Austria either on a national or on a European potentially crack down every “foreign” civil soci- level. This way, different organizations are lumped ety organization, which protests the government together which are not terrorist organizations like and is considered a threat to the government. DAESH or Al-Qaida. Hence, symbols of terror- Currently, the minister is from the radical right ism and symbols of political and/or religious ex- FPÖ, which makes it even more worrisom that tremism are banned under the same pretenses there will be an extension of threatening groups in order to focus on foreign nationalism and ex- 2. Interestingly, the affected organizations all share tremism and to distract … from homebred white only one central trait: they have their roots out- nationalism and extremism. side of Austria. A more honest initiative would have been to call the legislation what it is - a for- WHO IS THE ACT TARGETING IMMEDIATELY? eign symbols’ ban. With the backdrop of an an- According to the Austrian government, the PKK has ti-foreign and racist FPÖ in power, this move re- around 4,000 sympathizers in Austria. Their symbols veals itself to be quite one-sided, especially given are frequently used during demonstrations, not only the prevalence of white nationalism, which leads regarding their core issues but also when PKK-sympa- us to the third observation. thetic organizations rally alongside other organizations 3. Radical right and nationalist white organizations regarding an array of issues This is also true for the mil- are fully ignored. The Office for the Protection of itary wing of Hizbullah, although the symbols of this the Constitution and Counterterrorism produces organization are far less prevalent on the streets. Another an annual report, which surveils numerous rad- symbol that is even more spread in youth culture among ical right organizations such as the Identitarian Turkish-origin youth is the sign of the grey wolves, the Movement. None of these organizations have so-called wolf greeting. Rather than being a symbol spe- been targeted in this act. This is understandable cific to the organization of the grey wolves or its Turkish given the fact that many of these radical right mother party, the MHP, it is a symbol frequently used organizations have personal links to personali- to demonstrate Turkish nationalist pride. These organi- ties of the current ruling party, the FPÖ, a par- zations’ symbols are the most widespread and hence the ty that was originally established by ex-Nazis for ones immediately affected by the legislation. 2 Ministry of Interior: ‚Schlag gegen Muslimbruderschaft und Graue Wölfe‘, 3 Farid Hafez, “Shifting Borders: Islamophobia as the Cornerstone for Artikel Nr: 16437 vom Montag, November 19, 2018, https://www.bmi. Building Pan-European Right-Wing Unity” Patterns of Prejudice 48 (5) gv.at/news.aspx?id=57567834466641794F59303D [November 26, 2018] 2014, 479-499. 2 setav.org BANNING SYMBOLS OF EXTREMISM IN AUSTRIA: TARGETING EXTREMISM OR CIVIL SOCIETY? WHO IS THE ACT TARGETING INDIRECTLY? cies,” he stated.6 In the eyes of these neocon hawkish Since the law allows the minister of interior to expand Islamophobes, Austria has become a laboratory for the the symbols to other “affiliated” organizations by implementation of institutionalized Islamophobia. mere decree, potentially every organization which a government may want to connect with the mentioned REFRAMING ISLAM organizations may be affected. The official interpreta- Again, long-lived ideas precede the latest initiative. tion of the law by the lawmakers has already revealed Already in 2017, the head of the far-right Austrian in the case of the symbols of the Muslim Brotherhood Freedom Party called for a ban of “fascistic Islam,” tak- that it is not targeting the Muslim Brotherhood itself, ing up a term that was coined by one of the leading but rather those Muslim civil society organizations hawkish neoconservative authors, Norman Podhoretz, that criticize the government for its anti-Muslim pol- who saw “Islamofascism” as the new enemy for a itics. The interpretation widely drew on a report that coming crusade in his NYT bestseller World War IV. was written by a biased scholar that is connected to Vice-chancellor Heinz-Christian Strache used this a think tank whose many fellows systematically tar- notion intentionally to follow a current strategy to get the most vocal Muslim civil society organizations reframe Islam as a political ideology rather than a reli- across Europe with the aim to criminalize them and gion. He argued that by banning the symbols of “fas- subsequently exclude them from the public sphere.4 cistic Islam,” he was putting an end to the “creeping This reminds us of similar initiatives in the USA, Islamization,” a favorite reference point of the far-right where critical experts have repeatedly warned that the in Europe. With this initiative, Strache builds on the call to outlaw the Muslim Brotherhood is nothing but legacy of the Austrian law banning symbols that rep- an attempt to crack down critical political opposition. resent Nazi ideology. Clearly, this also feeds into the For instance, the Network Against Islamophobia attempt to reframe Islam as a political ideology rather (NAI), a project of the Jewish Voice for Peace, argued than a religion. While nowadays Strache tries to make that the Trump Administration could easily “use this clear that he differentiates between a good Islam and legislation [Muslim Brotherhood Ban, FH] and an ex- a bad Islam, he spoke a different language during his ecutive order to target national and local Muslim civil days in opposition. Back then, Strache would argue that “the difference between Islam and Islamism is the liberties and other organizations that work on behalf same as the difference between terror and terrorism.” of Muslim communities.”5 This seems also to be the In other words, there is no difference, which implies case in Austria.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Austria's Shift to Authoritarian Islam Politics
    NO: 40 PERSPECTIVE MAY 2018 Austria’s Shift to Authoritarian Islam Politics FARID HAFEZ • How can we contextualize the initiative for banning the hijab? • What is this ban’s main function? • Is this law just another step of introducing discriminatory laws that treat Muslims differently than other religious groups? • What can the Islamic Religious Community do about these plans? INTRODUCTION The latest legal initiative for banning the hijab While Austria was long known for its inclusion into was initiated by the new Austrian government, which the polity of Muslim institutions by recognizing Islam is a coalition of the People’s Party (ÖVP) under the as early as 1912 and the existence of an authorized re- leadership of Sebastian Kurz, who is a central actor ligious community, a corporate public body, for Mus- in the recent changes of Austria’s Islam politics - he lims since 1979, Austria’s Islam politics have recently was state secretary of integration and then minister shifted to a much more authoritarian relation to its of foreign affairs and integration s-, and the right- Muslims citizens that reflect the tendencies of securiti- wing populist Freedom Party (FPÖ). This also breaks zation of Islam in many countries across the world. with a very loose regulation of the hijab that predat- With the new Islam Act of 2015, the Austrian govern- ed this new initiative.3 ment institutionalized a discriminatory act, which The latest initiative for banning the hijab builds on made Muslims second-class citizens regarding their a long campaign targeting
    [Show full text]
  • Islamophobia Studies Yearbook Jahrbuch Für Islamophobieforschung 2016
    Islamophobia Studies Yearbook Jahrbuch für Islamophobieforschung 2016 Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.dnb.de abrufbar. Alle Rechte, insbesondere das Recht der Vervielfältigung und Verbreitung sowie der Übersetzung, vorbehalten. Kein Teil des Werkes darf in irgendeiner Form (durch Fotokopie, Mikrofilm oder ein anderes Verfahren) ohne schriftliche Genehmigung des Verlages reproduziert oder unter Verwendung elektronischer Systeme gespeichert, verarbeitet, vervielfältigt oder verbreitet werden. © 2016 by new academic press og A-1160 Wien www.newacademicpress.at www.jahrbuch-islamophobie.de ISBN 978-3-7003-1953-5 Cover: Max Bartholl Satz: Peter Sachartschenko Druck: Primr Rate, Budapest Islamophobia Studies Yearbook Jahrbuch für Islamophobieforschung 2016 Vol. 7 Farid Hafez (Ed./Hg.) Editor/Herausgeber: Dr. Farid Hafez Department of Sociology and Political Science, Universität Salzburg Editorial Staff/Redaktion: Fatma Kücük, University of Vienna Sanaa Laabich, University Greifswald International Advisory Board/Wissenschaftlicher Beirat: Prof. Iman Attia Alice Salomon Hochschule Berlin Prof. Klaus J. Bade Historian, Universität Osnabrück Dr. Hatem Bazian Editor, Islamophobia Studies Journal, University of California Berkeley Prof. Wolfgang Benz Zentrum für Antisemitismusforschung, Technische Universität Berlin Prof. John Bunzl Österreichisches Institut
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia: the State of the Field
    16 ISJ 3(2) Comparing Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia: The State of the Field Farid Hafez University of Salzburg ISLAMOPHOBIA STUDIES JOURNAL VOLUME 3, NO. 2, Spring 2016, PP. 16-34. Published by: Islamophobia Research and Documentation Project, Center for Race and Gender, University of California, Berkeley. Disclaimer: Statements of fact and opinion in the articles, notes, perspectives, etc. in the Islamophobia Studies Journal are those of the respective authors and contributors. They are not the expression of the editorial or advisory board and staff. No representation, either expressed or implied, is made of the accuracy of the material in this journal and ISJ cannot accept any legal responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions that may be made. The reader must make his or her own evaluation of the accuracy and appropriateness of those materials. 17 Comparing Anti-Semitism and Islamophobia: The State of the Field Farid Hafez University of Salzburg “Vienna shall not become Jerusalem” —Karl Lueger, Major of Vienna, c. 19101 “Vienna shall not become Istanbul” —Heinz Christian Strache, Chair of the Austrian Freedom Party, 2005 ABSTRACT: In the European public discourse on Islamophobia, comparisons of anti- Semitism and Islamophobia have provoked heated debates. The academic discourse has also touched on this issue, an example being the works of Edward Said, where he alludes to connections between anti-Semitism and Islamophobia. Following the 2003 publication of the Islamophobia report produced by the EU Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA), which discusses the similarities between Islamophobia and anti-Semitism, scholars in various fields began a debate that compares and contrasts anti-Semitism and Islamophobia.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Islam As a Threat? the Paradigm Shift in Austria's Security Politics
    OFFICIAL ISLAM AS A THREAT? THE PARADIGM SHIFT IN AUSTRIA’S SECURITY POLITICS FARID HAFEZ PERSPECTIVE SEPTEMBER 2019 . NUMBER 56 • What is the history of Austria’s security politics vis-à-vis Islam? • What are the factors explaining the new security politics? • What are the implications of the new security politics? • What can be done to counteract this new development? INTRODUCTION the Islamic Religious Community as a partner against For a very long time Austria has been known as one extremism and especially Jihadism. This seems to have of the most open and progressively accommodat- profoundly changed with the new annual report of the ing countries in terms of Muslim life and practice. security agency BVT; the yearly report is entitled Ver- With the Islam Act of 1912, which goes back to the fassungsschutzbericht (literally: Report on the Protec- Habsburg monarchy, Austria was one of the very few tion of the Constitution). countries to legally recognize Muslims as a religious In the past, Islam as a religion had never been re- community. On the other hand, in more recent times, garded as a threat. Rather the opposite, the Staatspo- Austria has become infamous for the anti-Muslim pro- lizei (State Police) had clearly regarded the Islamic paganda in party politics, spearheaded especially by Religious Community (IGGÖ, Islamische Glaubens- the right-wing extreme Freedom Party that previously gemeinschaft in Österreich), which is the legally recog- governed the country together with Sebastian Kurz’s nized denomination of Muslims based on the Islam newly branded Conservatives (OVP). Especially the Act of 1912, as the main institution of Muslims.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamophobi Afis
    Second International Conference on Islamophobia Islamophobia: Analyzing its Discourse and Geopolitics April 12-14, 2019 ISEFAM Auditorium, IZU Halkalı Campus Register at ciga.izu.edu.tr Limited ORGANISATION OF Seats ISLAMIC COOPERATION CIGA Research Centre for CENTER FOR ISLAM Islamc Hstory, Art AND GLOBAL AFFAIRS and Culture ORGANISATION OF ISLAMIC COOPERATION CIGA Research Centre for CENTER FOR ISLAM Islamc Hstory, Art AND GLOBAL AFFAIRS and Culture Second International Conference on Islamophobia Islamophobia: Analyzing its Discourse and Geopolitics April 12-14, 2019 ISEFAM Auditorium, IZU Halkalı Campus Dr. Sami A. Al-Arian Dr. Selim Argun Dr. Varsha Basheer IZU, Turkey Istanbul University, Turkey University of Kerala, India Dr. Fatimah Bint Abdullah Dr. Usaama Al-Azami Dr. Ihsan Bagby IZU, Turkey The Markfield Institute, UK University of Kentucky, USA Mr. Ahmed Bedier Dr. Ömer Çaha Mr. Elsadig Elsheikh United Voices of America, USA IZU, Turkey Univ. of California-Berkeley, USA Dr. Hatem Bazian Dr. Mehmet Bulut Dr. Khadijah Elshayyal Univ. of California-Berkeley, USA IZU, Turkey University of Edinburgh, UK Dr. Farid Hafez Ms. Linda Hyökki Dr. Ravza Kavakcı Kan University of Salzburg, Austria IZU, Turkey MP, Istanbul Dr. Dalia Fahmy Dr. Nagihan Haliloğlu Dr. Monzer Kahf Long Island University, USA Ibn Haldun University, Turkey IZU, Turkey Dr. Talip Küçükcan Dr. Luwei Rose Luqiu Dr. Shaireen Rasheed Marmara University, Turkey Hong Kong Baptist University, China Long Island University, USA Dr. Deepa Kumar Dr. Nuray Ocaklı Dr. Anne Norton Rutgers University, USA IZU, Turkey University of Pennsylvania, USA Register at Dr. Salman Sayyid Dr. Nasuh Uslu Dr. Jasmin Zine ciga.izu.edu.tr University of Leeds, UK IZU, Turkey Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada Limited Seats Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Muslims Fit to Print
    SREXXX10.1177/2332649220903747Sociology of Race and EthnicityYazdiha 903747research-article2020 Racialization and Muslim Experience Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 2020, Vol. 6(4) 501 –516 All the Muslims Fit to Print: © American Sociological Association 2020 DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649220903747 10.1177/2332649220903747 Racial Frames as Mechanisms sre.sagepub.com of Muslim Ethnoracial Formation in the New York Times from 1992 to 2010 Hajar Yazdiha1 Abstract A generative turn in scholarship examines the institutional and political dimensions of Islamophobia, conceptualizing Muslim representations as a mechanism of ethnoracial formation in which the media is one such site of racialization. Moments of great political and cultural transformation can motivate and activate these racial projects, generating racialized representations that attach racial meaning to bodies. Much of the research on Muslim representations in news media centers on this very question: did the attacks of 9/11 usher in a new racial project? Previous studies offer competing hypotheses. Bridging social movement and communication theories with a theory of ethnoracial formation, the author develops an approach for evaluating racial framing processes through a comparison of diagnostic, prognostic, and motivational frames. The author applies this approach using computational text analysis techniques to examine latent shifts in the racial framing of Muslims in the New York Times in the decade before and after 9/11. The author finds evidence of increasingly racialized, but more complex, representations of Muslims in the decade after 9/11 in which diagnostic frames evolve from locating social problems in states and institutions to locating social problems in Muslim bodies. Prognostic frames shift from institutional reforms to those targeting group pathology.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Program “Democracy and Islam”
    ÖSTERREICHISCHE FORSCHUNGSGEMEINSCHAFT AUSTRIAN RESEARCH ASSOCIATION ARBEITSGRUPPE ZUKUNFT DER DEMOKRATIE WORKING GROUP ON DEMOCRACY PRELIMINARY PROGRAM 5th Research Conference “DEMOCRACY AND ISLAM” Vienna, November 05-06, 2015 Conference Venue: Austrian Foundation for Development Research Sensengasse 3 | 1090 Vienna Conference room of the institute’s library Conference Topic This conference aims at discussing the relationship between ‘Islam’ and ‘democracy’. Islam has become a political issue after the Islamic Revolution in Iran and even more so after Huntington’s theory of the Clash of Civilizations. At the latest since 9/11 and following attacks by so called homegrown terrorists in Europe and the US, Islam has also become an issue in domestic politics in many Western countries. State authorities and political representatives in the realm of security, education, youth, and culture have had to react to the various Islam-discourses by engaging in the debate itself and/or by implementing new policies and laws. Moreover, Muslim actors have appeared on the political stage, publically stating their interests and voicing their concerns and grievances. These developments have had important consequences for democratic processes. How are democratic narratives, frames, and/or principles challenged by the rise of exclusionary politics and ethnocratic arguments? How do state authorities incorporate Muslim civic organizations in the political system? What are the implications of politics of resistance and opposition to, or support for the practices of the democratic state on the part of Muslim actors? It is these questions that form the core agenda of this conference. Organizing Institution The Working Group on the Future of Austrian Democracy of the Austrian Research Association is a national interdisciplinary and inter-institutional panel of scholars organized under the auspices of the Austrian Research Association and led by Reinhard Heinisch, Professor of Political Science at University of Salzburg.
    [Show full text]
  • The Muslim Brotherhood Allegation
    CRIMINALIZING MUSLIM CIVIL SOCIETY IN THE WEST THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ALLEGATION FARID HAFEZ PERSPECTIVE MAY 2019 . NUMBER 55 • What is the history of designating the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States a “Terrorist Organization”? • What are the implications of the Brotherhood label by the western governments? • What does the Muslim Brotherhood allegation mean? • How are Muslim civil society organizations threatened by the designation of the Brotherhood as a terrorist organization? INTRODUCTION Adraoui from Georgetown University’s School of For- A recent initiative taken by the U.S. president to des- eign Service argues. According to Adraoui , irrecon- ignate the Muslim Brotherhood as a “Foreign Terrorist cilable ideological differences always came second to Organization” (FTO) has sparked criticism from dif- political pragmatism.2 The Carnegie Endowment pub- ferent directions. Most of the criticism was warning lished a list of nine reasons, ranging from legal, diplo- of a strategic mistake for the sole lasting superpower’s matic, pragmatic, to civil rights reasons, why declaring foreign policy. Neither is the call to designate the the Muslim Brotherhood a FTO would be a mistake.3 Brotherhood new, nor is the criticism thereof. Texas Accordingly, United States law does not permit desig- Republican Senator Ted Cruz had already sponsored a nation based on ideology rather than violent actions. document in November 2015 for review by the Senate Such a move would be a politicization of the process, Foreign Relations Committee, which was approved by leaving the grounds of rule of legal procedures. Marc the House Judiciary Committee on February 24, 2016. Lynch, senior fellow in the Carnegie Middle East Pro- While this did not go through, Senator Cruz again in- troduced a bill to designate the Brotherhood as a FTO 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Curriculum Vitae Dr. FARID HAFEZ [email protected] www.faridhafez.com Staatsbürgerschaft: Österreich Geschäftsadresse: Dr. Farid Hafez Senior Post Doc Institut für Politikwissenschaft und Soziologie Rudolfskai 42, A-5020 Salzburg Universität Salzburg, Österreich Hauptberufungen – Senior Research Scholar, The Bridge Initiative an der Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service an der Georgetown University (seit 2017) – Senior Post-Doc, Abteilung für Politikwissenschaft und Soziologie, Universität Salzburg (seit 2019) Vergangene Positionen (seit 2008) – Post-Doc Researcher, Abteilung für Politikwissenschaft, Post-Doc (2014-2019) – Gastdozent, Abteilung für Politikwissenschaft, Istanbul Zaim Universität (2018) – Fulbright–Botstiber Gastprofessor für österreichisch-amerikanische Studien an der University of California, Berkeley (Spring 2017) – Post-Doc-Forscher und Dozent, Fachbereich Politikwissenschaft und Soziologie, Universität Salzburg (2014-2017) – Fakultät, Privater Studiengang für das Lehramt für Islamische Religion an Pflichtschulen (2009-2016) – Gastwissenschaftler, Columbia University in New York City (Feb-April 2013) – Pre-Doc Researcher, Universität Wien, Institut für Rechtsphilosophie, Religions- und Kulturrecht (2008-2010) – Fakultät, Salzburg Seminar American Studies Association (SSASA) (2012) Sonstige Ernennungen – Affiliated Faculty, Center for Right Wing Studies, Universität Kallifornien, Berkely seit 2017) – Mitglied, International Consortium of Islamophobia Studies (seit 2017) – Fakultät, The Arian de Rothschild Fellowship
    [Show full text]
  • Islamophobia in the United States: a Reading Resource Pack by Rhonda Itaoui and Elsadig Elsheikh
    Research Lit Review September 2018 Islamophobia in the United States: A Reading Resource Pack by Rhonda Itaoui and Elsadig Elsheikh HAASINSTITUTE.BERKELEY.EDU This publication is published by the Haas Institute for a Fair and Inclusive Society at UC Berkeley This Reading Resource Pack was developed by researchers from the Global Justice Program at the Haas Institute, as part of its larger project of documenting and countering Islamophobia. About the Authors Reviewers Contact Rhonda Itaoui is a Research Farid Hafez 460 Stephens Hall Fellow with the Haas Institute, Salzburg University Berkeley, CA 94720-2330 working with the Global Anna Mansson McGinty Tel 510-642-3326 Justice program to produce University of Wisconsin- haasinstitute.berkeley.edu research on Islamophobia and Milwaukee the exclusion of Muslims in the West. She is in the final year of a PhD program in Copyeditor Social Sciences at Western Marc Abizeid Sydney University in Australia, and a visiting scholar at the Cover Art UC Berkeley Islamophobia Kyung Chyun Research and Documentation designer + illustrator Project. Her international www.kchyun.com PhD fieldwork explores the relational impacts of globalized Design & Layout Islamophobia on the spatial Rachelle Galloway-Popotas mobility of young Muslims in the California Bay Area and in Report Citation Sydney, Australia. Rhonda Itaoui and Elsadig Elsheikh. “Islamophobia Elsadig Elsheikh is the director in the United States: A of the Global Justice Program Reading Resource Pack.” at the Haas Institute where his Haas Institute for a Fair and research focuses on the socio- Inclusive Society, University of political dynamics of neoliberal California, Berkeley. Berkeley, globalization as related to CA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Muslim Brotherhood in Austria
    THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IN AUSTRIA Dr. Lorenzo Vidino August 2017 GW Program on Extremism · extremism.gwu.edu · @gwupoe | University of Vienna · univie.ac.at · @univienna Table of Contents ABOUT THE AUTHOR ........................................................................................ 1 DISCLAIMER ..................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 4 SECTION I. THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IN THE WEST ................................ 5 I.I What is the Muslim Brotherhood? ..................................................................5 I.II The Muslim Brotherhood in the West ........................................................... 6 I.III Three Categories of the Brotherhood in the West .....................................8 I.IV The Brotherhood’s Ideology in the West ................................................... 10 I.V Assessing the Brotherhood in the West ..................................................... 13 I.VI The 2014 British Government’s Review of the Brotherhood ................ 14 SECTION II. THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IN AUSTRIA .............................. 15 II.I The Pioneers .................................................................................................... 15 II.II Brotherhood Spawns ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Curriculum Vitae Dr. FARID HAFEZ [email protected] www.faridhafez.com Citizenship: Austrian Office Address: Dr. Farid Hafez Senior Post Doc Department of Political Science and Sociology Rudolfskai 42, A-5020 Salzburg University of Salzburg, Austria Occupation and Principal Appointments – Senior Research Scholar, The Bridge Initiative at Georgetown University, Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service (since 2017) – Senior Post-Doc, Department of Political Science and Sociology, University of Salzburg (since 2019) Past Principal Appointments (since 2008) – Post-Doc Researcher, Department of Political Science, Post-Doc (2014-2019) – Visiting Professor, Department of Political Science, Istanbul Zaim University (2018) – Fulbright–Botstiber Visiting Professor of Austrian-American Studies at University of California, Berkeley (Spring 2017) – Post-Doc Researcher and Lecturer, Department of Political Science and Sociology, University of Salzburg (2014-2017) – Faculty, Muslim Teachers Training College (2009-2016) – Visiting Scholar, Columbia University in New York City (Feb-April 2013) – Pre-Doc Researcher, University of Vienna, Department of Law (2008-2010) – Faculty, Salzburg Seminar American Studies Association (SSASA) (2012) Other Current Appointments – Affiliated Faculty, Center for Right Wing Studies, University of California, Berkeley (since 2017) – Member, International Consortium of Islamophobia Studies (since 2017) – Faculty, The Arian de Rothschild Fellowship (2015-2017) – Affiliated Faculty, The Islamophobia Research and Documentation
    [Show full text]