DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Transportation 1995: Current Research in Operations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD No. 1503 Public Transit Public Transportation 1995: Current Research in Operations A peer-reviewed publication of the Transportation Research Board TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS WASHINGTON, D.C. 1995 Transportation Research Record 1503 John P. Aurelius, James A. Brown, James W. Burcham, Donald 0. Eisele, ISSN 0361-1981 Thomas E. Frawley, George Edward Gray, Steven R. Hanson, ISBN 0-309-06165-2 Thomas R. Hickey, Jack M. Kanarek, Jerome Kirzner, R. David Minister, Price: $30.00 Jeffrey G. Mora, Katherine O'Neil, Eugene K. Skoropowski, George M. Smerk, James Stoetzel, Edson Leigh Tennyson, Subscriber Category John F. Tucker III, Richard W. Whitehead VI public transit Committee on Paratransit Printed in the United States of America Chairman: Roy E. Lave, Systan Inc. James Chin; Robert H. Corressel, David J. Cyra, Manuel de Alba Perez, Richard DeRock, Gorman Gilbert, Roy E. Glauthier, Robert Jans, F. Ron Jones, Alfred B. LaGasse III, Barbara Lupro, Rosemary G. Mathias, Claire E. McKnight, Gerald K. Miller, Peter M. Schauer, Nancy L. Senn, S. Ling Sponsorship of Transportation Research Record 1503 Suen, Roger F. Teal GROUP 1-TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS PLANNING AND Committee on Light Rail Transit ADMINISTRATION Chairman: Thomas F. Larwin, San Diego Metropolitan Transportation Chairman: Thomas F. Humphrey, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Development Board Secretary: John W. Schumann, LTK Engineering Services Public Transportation Section Gregory P. Benz, Jack W. Boorse, David Calver, Douglas R. (:ampion, Chairman: Subhash R. Mundie, Mundie & Associates Inc. Thomas J. Carmichael, John H. Chaput, Ronald DeGraw, Donald 0. Eisele, Rodney W. Kelly, S. David Phraner, Steven E. Polzin, Pilka Committee on Bus Transit Systems Robinson, Peter J. Schmidt, Joseph S. Silien, John D. Wilkins, Nigel H. M. Chairman: Kenneth 0. Stanley, Pierce County Public Transportation Wilson, Oliver W. Wischmeyer, Jr., Richard Wolsfeld, Jr. Secretary: John Dockendorf, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Bruce B. Emory, Donn Fichter, Edward R. Fleischman, Peter G. Furth, GROUP 2-DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF Michael R. Garcia, Richard L. Gerhart, George A. Gregori, Milton D. TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES Harmelink, Brendon Hemily, Andrew Hollander, Ronald J. Kilcoyne, Chairman: Michael G. Katona, U.S. Air Force Armstrong Lab Herbert S. Levinson, Leo F. Marshall, David M. Norstrom, Patti Post, Charles E. Prestrud, David J. Sampson, Franklin L. Spielberg Railway Systems Section Chairman: A. J. Reinschmidt, Association ofAmerican Railroads Committee on Intermodal Transfer Facilities Chairman: Gregory P. Benz, Parsons Brinckerhoff Committee on Rail Transit System Design Charles F. Arndt, Frank F. Baron III, Howard P. Benn, John F. Cikota, Chairman: Patrick A. Nowakowski, Southeastern Pennsylvania Matthew A. Coogan, Ilona V. Czinkota, Donald L. Dean, Benita H. Gray, Transportation Authority Thomas R. Hickey, Jerome M. Lutin, Gerald J. Pachucki, Richard R. Secretary: Donald A. Shoff, Daniel Mann Johnson Mendenhall Sarles, Jerry B. Schneider, Jorg Schonharting, W. Douglas Varn, William Robert C. Arnlund, Robert E. Clemons, Ronald H. Dunn, Michael E. M. Wood, Alexander Young Duval, George A. Figueredo, Earle M. Hughes, Bertie Jackson, Mohammad S. Longi, Vincent P. Mahon, Philip J. McQueen, James T. Committee on Rail Transit Systems Nelson, Don H. Painter, Robert Schumacher, Mahesh J. Sharma, Andrew Chairman: S. David Phraner, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Sluz, Roy T. Smith, Charles L. Stanford, Erland A. Tillman, John Insco Secretary: John P. Aurelius, NJ Transit Corporation Williams John A. Bailey, Paul N. Bay, Jack W. Boorse, Thomas J. Carmichael, Peter Fahrenwald, Alex E. Friedlander, Thomas R. Hickey, Wendy J. Hoyt, Transportation Research Board Staff Robert J. Landgraf, Thomas F. Larwin, Herbert S. Levinson, Richard S. Robert E. Spicher, Director, Technical Activities Marshment, R. David Minister, David J. Mitchell, Marianne A. Payne, Peter L. Shaw, Public Transportation Specialist Steven E. Polzin, Lee H. Rogers, P. Takis Salpeas, Peter J. Schmidt, John Elaine King, Rail Transport Specialist W. Schumann, John D. Wilkins, Nigel H. M. Wilson Nancy A. Ackerman, Director, Reports and Editorial Services Committee on Commuter Rail Transportation Sponsorship is indicated by a footnote at the end of each paper. The Chairman: Walter E. Zullig, Jr., Metro-North Commuter Railroad organizational units, officers, and members are as of December 31, Vice Chairman: Emmanuel S. Horowitz, AMTRAK 1994. Transportation Research Record 1503 Contents Foreword vii Part 1-Bus, Paratransit, and Electric Trolley Bus Metromover Extensions and Downtown Bus Service in Miami 3 Dennis Hinebaugh and Daniel K. Boyle Electric Bus Operation and Evaluation in California 14 T. Chira-Chavala, D. Empey, M. Puvathingal, and C. Venter Assessment of Alternative Structures for Privately Operated Bus Systems 23 faimu Won Bus Priority at Traffic Signals in Portland: The Powell Boulevard 29 Pilot Project Katharine M. Hunter-Zaworski, William C. Kloos, and Alan R. Danaher Transit Vehicle-Type Scheduling Problem 34 Avishai Ceder , Optimal Mixed Bus Fleet for Urban Operations 39 Kurt Ker-Tshung Lee, Sharon H.F. Kuo, and Paul M. Schonfeld Operational Characteristics of Paratransit in Developing Countries 49 of Asia Toshikazu Shimazaki and Md. Mukitur Rahman Economics of Electric Trolley Coach Operation 57 E. L. Tennyson Evaluation of Visual Impacts of Trolleybus Overhead 63 Catenary System Intersections Arthur Schwartz, John S. Kulpa, and John C. Falcocchio Electric and Magnetic Fields and Electric Transit Systems 69 Robert B. Fisher Part 2-Rail, Intermodal, and Light Rail Diverting Automobile Users to Transit: Early Lessons from the Chicago 79 Transit Authority's Orange Line Sarah]. LaBelle and Darwin G. Stuart Street-Running Rail Transit: A Historical Perspective 88 Herbert S. Levinson Diesel or Electric Power for Commuter Rail? It Depends... 96 Maurice A. Sulkin Generic Objectives for Evaluation of Intermodal Passenger 104 Transfer Facilities Alan J. Horowitz and Nick A. Thompson Airport Ground Access: Rail Transit Alternatives 111 Srinivasa R. Mandalapu and William J. Sproule Retrofit Techniques for Floating Slab Track 118 Homer M. Chen Calgary Light Rail Transit Surface Operations and 127 Grade-Level Crossings Dave Colquhoun, John Morrall, and John Hubbell Cost of Light Rail Collision Accidents 137 Christopher D. Porter, Mark M. Hansen, and Abner Gallardo Foreword This volume addresses the operational aspects of public transportation and presents new research. In each category, new ideas are explored and improved practices discussed. Potential application is real and holds significant promise of improved utility and better customer service. The papers are based upon presentations at TRB's 74th Annual Meeting in January 1995 in Wash­ ington, D.C., and have been reviewed by peers (practitioner and academic) in the field of public trans­ portation, in accordance with established Transportation Research Board procedures. In Part 1, Bus, Paratransit, and Electric Trolley Bus, research covers 10 topics. As systems grow, it is important to study service changes, as in the case of feeder bus service to the Miami, Florida cen­ tral business district (Hinebaugh and Boyle). On the West Coast, electric bus operations are evaluated as a new technology (Chira-Chavala et al.). Private bus service in Seoul, Korea, is undergoing service pressure from new subway lines and the private automobile (Won). To speed bus service, different bus priority at traffic signals technology is evaluated in Portland, Oregon (Hunter-Zaworski et al.). Still, maximizing scheduled use of transit vehicles is quite a challenge (Ceder) to model, as well as deter­ mining the optimal mixed bus fleet in urban service (Lee et al.). For paratransit, there is need to un­ derstand its role in the provision of transit service in developing countries (Shimazaki and Rahman). Electric trolley bus economics (Tennyson), evaluation of intersection configurations (Schwartz et al.), and electric magnetic fields (Fisher) are explored as well. In Part 2, eight topics of Rail, Intermodal, and Light Rail research are presented. In Chicago a new CBD-Midway Airport line opened and has increased ridership overall in the corridor (LaBelle and Stuart). Street-running transit (rail transit, interurban, streetcar) is evaluated as a guide to the future (Levinson). As more systems become commuter rail oriented, the alternatives of using diesel or elec­ tric power must be decided (Sulk.in). Other aspects of rail include evaluation of intermodal passenger transfer facilities (Horowitz and Thompson), rail access to airports (Mandalapu and Sproule), and track noise mitigation (Chen). In Calgary, Canada, light rail transit safety (Colquhoun et al.) and in San Jose, California, light rail collision accidents (Porter et al.) are analyzed. Research in public transportation operations has clearly expanded in the last several years. There is much of interest to report. vii PARTl Bus, Paratransit, and Electric Trolley Bus TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1503 3 Metromover Extensions and Downtown Bus Service in Miami DENNIS HINEBAUGH AND DANIEL K. BOYLE The results of survey of feeder bus service in the Miami Central Busi­ within the Omni and Brickell corridors. The third section contains ness District (CBD) serving the elevated Miami Metromover downtown an analysis of the impacts of truncating
Recommended publications
  • CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT

    CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT

    CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT The 2003 PMT outlined the actions needed to bring the MBTA transit system into a state of good repair (SGR). It evaluated and prioritized a number of specific enhancement and expansion projects proposed to improve the system and better serve the regional mobility needs of Commonwealth residents. In the inter- vening years, the MBTA has funded and implemented many of the 2003 PMT priorities. The transit improvements highlighted in this chapter have been accomplished in spite of the unsus- tainable condition of the Authority’s present financial structure. A 2009 report issued by the MBTA Advisory Board1 effectively summarized the Authority’s financial dilemma: For the past several years the MBTA has only balanced its budgets by restructuring debt liquidat- ing cash reserves, selling land, and other one-time actions. Today, with credit markets frozen, cash reserves depleted and the real estate market at a stand still, the MBTA has used up these options. This recession has laid bare the fact that the MBTA is mired in a structural, on-going deficit that threatens its viability. In 2000 the MBTA was re-born with the passage of the Forward Funding legislation.This legislation dedicated 20% of all sales taxes collected state-wide to the MBTA. It also transferred over $3.3 billion in Commonwealth debt from the State’s books to the T’s books. In essence, the MBTA was born broke. Throughout the 1990’s the Massachusetts sales tax grew at an average of 6.5% per year. This decade the sales tax has barely averaged 1% annual growth.
  • Bus Subsidy Reform Consultation Response Form

    Bus Subsidy Reform Consultation Response Form

    Bus Subsidy Reform Consultation Response Form Part 1 - Information about you Name Jonathan Bray Address 40-50 Wellington Street, Leeds Postcode LS1 2DE email [email protected] Company Name Passenger Transport Executive Group (pteg) or Organisation (if applicable) Please tick one box from the list below that best describes you /your company or organisation. Small to Medium bus operator (up to 50 employees) Large bus operator Representative Organisation Trade Union Interest Group Local Government Central Government Member of the public Other (please describe): If you are responding on behalf of an organisation or interest group how many members do you have and how did you obtain the views of your members: We consulted them extensively and got sign off of the final draft. If you would like your response or personal details to be treated confidentially please explain why: PART 2 - Your comments 1. Do you agree with how we propose to YES NO calculate the amounts to be devolved? If not, what alternative arrangements would you suggest should be used? Please explain your reasons and add any additional comments you wish to make : We support the general principle that the initial amount devolved should be the amount paid to operators in the current financial year for supported services operating within the relevant Local Transport Authority area. However: • We believe that all funded services need to be brought into the calculation, not just those that have been procured by tender. A consistent approach needs to be taken to services which operate on a part- commercial/part-supported basis, including where individual journeys are supported in part, for example through a de-minimis payment to cover a diversion of an otherwise commercial journey.
  • Chapter 3 Road Network and Traffic Volume

    Chapter 3 Road Network and Traffic Volume

    The Study on Integrated Urban Transportation Master Plan for Istanbul Metropolitan Area in the Republic of Turkey Final Report Chapter 3 Chapter 3 Road Network and Traffic Volume 3.1 Road Network 3.1.1 Inter-regional Road Network 1) Existing Road Turkey is situated at the transit corridor between South-east Europe and the Middle East. Since “The Declaration for The Construction of International Arteries” (AGR) prepared by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE) in 1950 in Geneva, Turkey has developed international corridors connecting it to Southern Europe, because the international road network of AGR included an extension to Turkey. According to the provisions of AGR, two arteries should reach Turkey as E-Road. These are E-80 entering from the Bulgarian border (Kapikule) and E-90 entering from the Greek border (Ipsala). These two main routes link the International Road Network of Europe with the Middle East and Asia at southern and eastern borders of Turkey via Anatolia. Source: KGM, Ministry of Transportation Figure 3.1.1 International Road Network through Turkey, 2007 In addition to the E-Roads, the Trans-European Motorway (TEM) project is ongoing and it covers the whole country as an expressway network. The TEM highway network in Turkey starts from Edirne at the Bulgarian border and passes through Istanbul via the Fatih Sultan Mehmet Bridge and parts into two branches in Ankara going eastward and southward. Its eastern branch again parts into two branches in Askale. One of them reaches Trabzon in the Black Sea Region, and the other ends in Gurbulak at the Iranian border.
  • The Boston Case: the Story of the Green Line Extension

    The Boston Case: the Story of the Green Line Extension

    The Boston Case: The Story of the Green Line Extension Eric Goldwyn, Alon Levy, and Elif Ensari Background map sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community INTRODUCTION The Issue of Infrastructure The idea of a mass public works program building useful infrastructure is old, and broadly popular. There was a widespread conversation on this topic in the United States during the stimulus debate of the early Obama administration. Subsequently, there have been various proposals for further federal spending on infrastructure, which could take the form of state-level programs, the much- discussed and much-mocked Infrastructure Week initiatives during the Trump administration, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s call for a Green New Deal, and calls for massive federal spending on infrastructure in the 2020 election campaign including a $1.5-2 trillion figure put out by the Biden campaign. This is not purely an American debate, either. The Trudeau cabinet spent considerable money subsidizing infrastructure construction in Canada, including for example helping fund a subway under Broadway in Vancouver, which is the busiest bus corridor in North America today. Within Europe, there is considerable spending on infrastructure as part of the coronavirus recovery program even in countries that practiced fiscal austerity before the crisis, such as Germany. China likewise accelerated the pace of high-speed rail investment 2 during the global financial crisis of 2009 and its aftermath, and is currently looking for major investment of comparable scale due to the economic impact of corona. With such large amounts of money at stake—the $2 trillion figure is about 10% of the United States’ annual economic output—it is critical to ensure the money is spent productively.
  • T1 Tramvay Zaman Çizelgesi Ve Hat Güzergah Haritası

    T1 Tramvay Zaman Çizelgesi Ve Hat Güzergah Haritası

    T1 tramvay saatleri ve hat haritası Bağcılar →Kabataş Web Sitesi Modunda Görüntüle T1 tramvay hattı (Bağcılar →Kabataş) arası 4 güzergah içeriyor. Hafta içi günlerde çalışma saatleri: (1) Bağcılar →Kabataş: 00:00 - 23:45 (2) Cevizlibağ →Eminönü: 07:02 - 19:02 (3) Eminönü →Cevizlibağ: 07:32 - 19:32 (4) Kabataş →Bağcılar: 00:00 - 23:45 Size en yakın T1 tramvay durağınıbulmak ve sonraki T1 tramvay varış saatini öğrenmek için Moovit Uygulamasını kullanın. Varış yeri: Bağcılar →Kabataş T1 tramvay Saatleri 31 durak Bağcılar →Kabataş Güzergahı Saatleri: HAT SAATLERİNİ GÖRÜNTÜLE Pazartesi 00:00 - 23:45 Salı 00:00 - 23:45 Bağcılar 3. Sokak, Turkey Çarşamba 00:00 - 23:45 Güneştepe Perşembe 00:00 - 23:45 Yavuz Selim Cuma 00:00 - 23:45 Cumartesi 00:00 - 23:48 Soğanlı Gönül Sokak, Turkey Pazar 00:00 - 23:48 Akıncılar Abdi İpekçi Caddesi, A. Nafiz Gurman Güngören T1 tramvay Bilgi Yön: Bağcılar →Kabataş Merter Tekstil Merkezi Duraklar: 31 Yolculuk Süresi: 63 dk Mehmet Akif Hat Özeti: Bağcılar, Güneştepe, Yavuz Selim, Soğanlı, Akıncılar, Güngören, Merter Tekstil Zeytinburnu Merkezi, Mehmet Akif, Zeytinburnu, Mithatpaşa, Seyitnizam-Akşemsettin, Merkez Mithatpaşa Efendi, Cevizlibağ - A.Ö.Y., Topkapı, Pazartekke, Çapa-Şehremini, Fındıkzade, Haseki, Yusufpaşa, Aksaray, İstanbul Seyitnizam-Akşemsettin Üniversitesi - Laleli, Beyazıt-Kapalıçarşı, Çemberlitaş, Sultanahmet, Gülhane, Sirkeci, Merkez Efendi Eminönü, Karaköy, Tophane, Fındıklı - Mimar Sinan Üniversitesi, Kabataş Cevizlibağ - A.Ö.Y. Topkapı Pazartekke Çapa-Şehremini 125/B Turgut Özal Millet Caddesi,
  • 2020–2024 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN UPDATE Text-Only Version

    2020–2024 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN UPDATE Text-Only Version

    2020–2024 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN UPDATE Text-Only Version This page intentionally left blank 2020–2024 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... i Letter from Secretary Pollack ...................................................................................................... ii Non-Discrimination Protections .................................................................................................. iv Translation Availability ............................................................................................................. v Glossary of Terms ..................................................................................................................... vii Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 What’s New ................................................................................................................................ 6 Program Changes .................................................................................................................. 7 Funding .....................................................................................................................................12 State Funding ........................................................................................................................12 Federal
  • Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present

    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present

    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964.
  • Maximizing the Benefits of Mass Transit Services

    Maximizing the Benefits of Mass Transit Services

    Maximizing the Benefits of Mass Transit Stations: Amenities, Services, and the Improvement of Urban Space within Stations by Carlos Javier Montafiez B.A. Political Science Yale University, 1997 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF URBAN STUDIES AND PLANNING IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER IN CITY PLANNING AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUNE 2004 Q Carlos Javier Montafiez. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author: / 'N Dep tment of Urban Studies and Plav ning Jvtay/, 2004 Certified by: J. Mai Schuster, PhD Pfessor of U ban Cultural Policy '09 Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: / Dennis Frenthmfan, MArchAS, MCP Professor of the Practice of Urban Design Chair, Master in City Planning Committee MASSACH USEUSq INSTIUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUN 21 2004 ROTCH LIBRARIES Maximizing the Benefits of Mass Transit Stations: Amenities, Services, and the Improvement of Urban Space within Stations by Carlos Javier Montafiez B.A. Political Science Yale University, 1997 Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on May 20, 2004 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master in City Planning ABSTRACT Little attention has been paid to the quality of the spaces within rapid mass transit stations in the United States, and their importance as places in and of themselves. For many city dwellers who rely on rapid transit service as their primary mode of travel, descending and ascending into and from transit stations is an integral part of daily life and their urban experience.
  • Discussion Paper Nr

    Discussion Paper Nr

    discussion paper Nr. 41/2018 Juni/2018 discussion paper Houshmand E. Masoumi1, Amr Ah. Gouda1,7, Lucia Layritz1, Pia Stendera1, Cynthia Matta2, Haya Tabbakh3, Sima Razavi4, Houshiar Masoumi4, Betül Mannasoğlu5, Özlem Kılınç5, Ashraf M. Sharara6, Mahmoud Elnably7, Ahmad Alhakeem1, Sherzad Ismail1, Erik Fruth1 Urban Travel Behavior in Large Cities of MENA Region: Survey Results of Cairo, Istanbul, and Tehran 1 Technische Universität Berlin, Zentrum Technik und Gesellschaft, Germany 2 Notre Dame University, Louaize, Lebanon 3 American University of Beirut, Lebanon 4 Independent surveyor, Tehran, Iran 5 Istanbul Technical University, Turkey 6 Independent Surveyor, Cairo, Egypt 7 Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt Impressum Zentrum Technik und Gesellschaft Sekretariat HBS 1 Hardenbergstraße 16.18 10623 Berlin www.ztg.tu-berlin.de Die Discussion Paper werden von Martina Schäfer, Leon Hempel und Dorothee Keppler herausgegeben. Sie sind als pdf-Datei abrufbar unter: http://www.tu-berlin.de/ztg/menue/publikationen/discussion_papers/ 2 Abstract The present discussion paper summarizes an urban mobility survey as a part of the project “Urban Travel Behavior in Large Cities of MENA Region” (UTB-MENA) funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) undertaken in summer and autumn 2017 in Tehran, Istanbul, and Cairo. This data collection was conducted in 18 neighborhoods located in different urban forms related to three different eras: traditional urban form, in-between (transitional) urban form, and new developments. The survey instrument included 31 questions organized in six different sections. As a result of face- to-face interviews with residents as well as quantification of several land use indicators, a database of 8284 validated subjects (Cairo: 2786 , Istanbul: 2781 , Tehran: 2717) was created by the research team based in Berlin, Tehran, Istanbul, and Cairo.
  • Davutpaşa Campus

    Davutpaşa Campus

    DAVUTPAŞA CAMPUS AIRPORTS Atatürk Airport Atatürk International Airport (IST) at Yeşilköy, 14 miles west of Sultanahmet Square, is the busiest one of Turkey's major airports. You can travel between Atatürk Airport and the city center by (M1: Yenikapı-Atatürk Airport) metro, city bus, taxi, shuttle van (Havabus Shuttle) or private transfer. For Davutpaşa Campus, take the M1 metro line to the ‘Davutpaşa-Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi’ stop. Cross the avenue, you will see the entrance of the university. http://www.ataturkairport.com/en-EN/Pages/Main.aspx Sabiha Gökçen Airport https://www.sabihagokcen.aero/homepage Sabiha Gökçen International Airport (SAW) is on the Asian shore of the Bosphorus about 30 km (19 miles) southeast of Haydarpaşa Station, the Kadıköy ferry dock. You can travel between Sabiha Gökçen Airport and the center of Istanbul by city bus (E-10), shuttle van (Havabus Shuttle), taxi, private transfer or car rental. You can take E-10 city bus, it departs from Sabiha Gökçen Airport about every 15-20 minutes throughout the day. The bus stops at several bus stations in the town nearby, then goes on the E-5 highway to Kadıköy. You can get off Vergi Dairesi stop and take 500T city bus. Then you can get off Edirnekapı Kaleboyu stop and take 41AT going to Davutpaşa Campus directly. This route may take long time, so you can go for other possible route options as below. You can obtain the full schedule from the IETT website. (http://www.iett.istanbul/en) Havabus Shuttle (Airport Buses) in the direction of Sabiha Gökçen Airport departs from Taksim Square in Beyoğlu on the European side.
  • Green Line Extension Project EEA #13886

    Green Line Extension Project EEA #13886

    Draft Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Statement Green Line Extension Project EEA #13886 Volume 1 | Text October 2009 Executive Office of Transportation and Public Works U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (DEIR/EA) AND DRAFT SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION FOR THE GREEN LINE EXTENSION PROJECT CAMBRIDGE, SOMERVILLE, MEDFORD, MASSACHUSETTS STATE PROJECT NO. 13886 Prepared Pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 23, Part 771, Section 119 (23 CFR 771.119); 49 U.S.C. Section 303 [formerly Department of Transportation Act of 1966, Section 4(f)] and the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act M.G.L. CH 30 Sec. 61 through 62H by the FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and the COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS (EOT) Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Green Line Extension Project Assessment and Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations Secretary’s Certificate on the EENF Executive Summary 1 Introduction and Background .......................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Project Summary .................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3

  • Green Line Extension Update

    Green Line Extension Project Update Green Line Extension Update Fiscal and Management Control Board John Dalton, Program Manager April 13, 2020 1 Green Line Extension Project Update Agenda • GLX Project Update • GLT Lechmere Viaduct Rehabilitation (B22CN02) & Coordination with GLX • Lechmere Station Closure and Bus Diversion 2 Green Line Extension Project Update Design Build Entity Contract Cash Flow & Spending Updated Quarterly. Revised as of December 31, 2019. Actuals = Paid only (does not include retainage or change orders) 3 Green Line Extension Project Update Lechmere Viaduct and Station Area (existing and future) Gilman Square 4 Green Line Extension Project Update Red Bridge Viaduct Area (looking north) 5 Green Line Extension Project Update Future East Somerville Station 6 Green Line Extension Project Update Broadway Bridge Steel Erection 7 Green Line Extension Project Update Broadway Bridge Steel Erection 8 Green Line Extension Project Update Future Union Square Station 9 Green Line Extension Project Update GLX Site Overview Project Coordination Area 10 Green Line Extension Project Update Lechmere Station Demolition & New Viaduct Section Demolition of Existing Historic Concrete Steel Viaduct – Spring Viaduct Rehabilitation 2020 by GLT 11 Green Line Extension Project Update Lechmere Project Limits GLX – Project Limits GLT – Lechmere Viaduct Rehabilitation Project Green Line Extension (GLX) Green Line Transformation (GLT) 12 Green Line Extension Project Update GLT Lechmere Viaduct Rehabilitation Project Science Park/West End Station