DOCSLIB.ORG

Darwin's Six Botanical Books[11W-Oquotes-7328B]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Cited Reference Search: Charles Darwin’s Six Botanical Books Web of Science – Citation Databases (search performed as of 28 January 2013) Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) --1979-present Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) --1981-present Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI) --1979-present Conference Proceedings Citation Index- Science (CPCI-S) --1990-present Conference Proceedings Citation Index- Social Science & Humanities (CPCI-SSH) --1990- present Number of articles (unique) retrieved: 3,310 Number of citing references: 3,718 (all variants per review) Orchids 723 Climbing Plants 117 Insectivorous Plants 249 Cross and Self Fertilisation 869 Forms of Flowers 1,115 Power of Movement 597 ____ 3,670 Note: There is some overlap/duplication due to multiple citations to Darwin per article and/or within any book set. Duplicates were removed within each book’s set of citing articles, but not across the six books (an article may cite multiple books, i.e., total number of citing references is 3,718; after removing the duplicates within each book set, the number is reduced to 3,670). Number of articles published per year demonstrates a steady output with slight growth, and a further increase in 2009 (birth bicentennial; 150 year publication of the Origin). See Analysis Report (at end) displaying the distribution of articles by publication year. Orchids – Citing References Ackerman, J. D. 1989. Limitations to sexual reproduction in Encyclia krugii (Orchidaceae). Systematic Botany 14(1): 101-109. Ackerman, J. D. and M. R. Mesler. 1979. Pollination biology of Listera cordata (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 66(7): 820-824. Ackerman, J. D. and D. W. Roubik. 2012. Can extinction risk help explain plant-pollinator specificity among euglossine bee pollinated plants? Oikos 121(11): 1821-1827. Ackerman, J. D., A. Sabat and J. K. Zimmerman. 1996. Seedling establishment in an epiphytic orchid: An experimental study of seed limitation. Oecologia 106(2): 192-198. Ackerman, J. D. and S. Ward. 1999. Genetic variation in a widespread, epiphytic orchid: Where is the evolutionary potential? Systematic Botany 24(2): 282-291. Adams, P. B. and S. D. Lawson. 1993. Pollination in Australian orchids - a critical assessment of the literature 1882-1992. Australian Journal of Botany 41(4-5): 553-575. Agosta, S. J. and D. H. Janzen. 2005. Body size distributions of large Costa Rican dry forest moths and the underlying relationship between plant and pollinator morphology. Oikos 108(1): 183-193. Aguiar, J. M. R. B. V., L. M. Pansarin, J. D. Ackerman and E. R. Pansarin. 2012. Biotic versus abiotic pollination in Oeceoclades maculata (Lindl.) Lindl. (Orchidaceae). Plant Species Biology 27(1): 86-95. Ahouse, J. C. 1998. The tragedy of a priori selectionism: Dennett and Gould on adaptationism. Biology & Philosophy 13(3): 359-391. Aigner, P. A. 2001. Optimality modeling and fitness trade-offs: When should plants become pollinator specialists? Oikos 95(1): 177-184. Al-Awqati, Q. 2006. Let us intelligently design a new kidney! Kidney International 70(1): 2-3. Alcantara, S. and L. G. Lohmann. 2010. Evolution of floral morphology and pollination system in Bignonieae (Bignoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 97(5): 782-796. Alexandersson, R. and S. D. Johnson. 2002. Pollinator-mediated selection on flower-tube length in a hawkmoth-pollinated Gladiolus (Iridaceae). Proceedings of the Royal Society B- Biological Sciences 269(1491): 631-636. Allem, A. C. 2003. Optimization theory in plant evolution: An overview of long-term evolutionary prospects in the angiosperms. Botanical Review 69(3): 225-251. Anderson, B. and S. D. Johnson. 2008. The geographical mosaic of coevolution in a plant- pollinator mutualism. Evolution 62(1): 220-225. —. 2009. Geographical covariation and local convergence of flower depth in a guild of fly- pollinated plants. New Phytologist 182(2): 533-540. Anderson, B., J. S. Terblanche and A. G. Ellis. 2010. Predictable patterns of trait mismatches between interacting plants and insects. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10: 14. Anderson, M. L. 2010. Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33(4): 245-313. Anderson, N. F. 1982. The marriage with a deceased wife’s sister bill controversy - incest anxiety and the defense of family purity in Victorian England. Journal of British Studies 21(2): 67-86. —. 1986. Cousin marriage in Victorian England. Journal of Family History 11(3): 285-301. Ansaloni, L., F. Catena and A. D. Pinna. 2009. What Is the Function of the Human Vermiform Appendix? Evolution-Based Surgery: A New Perspective in the Darwinian Year 2009. European Surgical Research 43(2): 67-71. Antonelli, A., C. J. Dahlberg, K. H. I. Carlgren and T. Appelqvist. 2009. Pollination of the Lady’s slipper orchid (Cypripedium calceolus) in Scandinavia - taxonomic and conservational aspects. Nordic Journal of Botany 27(4): 266-273. Arathi, H. S. and J. K. Kelly. 2004. Corolla morphology facilitates both autogamy and bumblebee pollination in Mimulus guttatus. International Journal of Plant Sciences 165(6): 1039-1045. Arditti, J. 1984. An history of orchid hybridization, seed germination and tissue culture. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 89(4): 359-381. Arditti, J., J. Elliott, I. J. Kitching and L. T. Wasserthal. 2012. ‘Good Heavens what insect can suck it’- Charles Darwin, Angraecum sesquipedale and Xanthopan morganii praedicta. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 169(3): 403-432. Arditti, J. and A. K. A. Ghani. 2000. Tansley review No. 110 - Numerical and physical properties of orchid seeds and their biological implications. New Phytologist 145(3): 367-421. Arista, M. and P. L. Ortiz. 2007. Differential gender selection on floral size: an experimental approach using Cistus salvifolius. Journal of Ecology 95(5): 973-982. Armbruster, W. S. 1988. Multilevel comparative analysis of the morphology, function, and evolution of Dalechampia blossoms. Ecology 69(6): 1746-1761. —. 1997. Exaptations link evolution of plant-herbivore and plant-pollinator interactions: A phylogenetic inquiry. Ecology 78(6): 1661-1672. —. 2001. Evolution of floral form: Electrostatic forces, pollination, and adaptive compromise. New Phytologist 152(2): 181-183. —. 2002. Can indirect selection and genetic context contribute to trait diversification? A transition-probability study of blossom-colour evolution in two genera. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15(3): 468-486. Armbruster, W. S., M. E. Edwards, J. F. Hines, R. L. A. Mahunnah and P. Munyenyembe. 1993. Evolution and pollination of Madagascan and African Dalechampia. Research & Exploration 9(4): 460-474. Armbruster, W. S., Y. B. Gong and S. Q. Huang. 2011. Are Pollination Syndromes Predictive? Asian Dalechampia Fit Neotropical Models. American Naturalist 178(1): 135-143. Armbruster, W. S., T. F. Hansen, C. Pelabon, R. Perez-Barrales and J. Maad. 2009a. The adaptive accuracy of flowers: Measurement and microevolutionary patterns. Annals of Botany 103(9): 1529-1545. Armbruster, W. S. and N. Muchhala. 2009. Associations between floral specialization and species diversity: Cause, effect, or correlation? Evolutionary Ecology 23(1): 159-179. Armbruster, W. S., C. Pelabon, T. F. Hansen and G. H. Bolstad. 2009b. Macroevolutionary patterns of pollination accuracy: A comparison of three genera. New Phytologist 183(3): 600-617. Arnold, A. E., L. J. Lamit, C. A. Gehring, M. I. Bidartondo and H. Callahan. 2010. Interwoven branches of the plant and fungal trees of life. New Phytologist 185(4): 874-878. Aronne, G., M. Giovanetti and V. De Micco. 2012. Morphofunctional Traits and Pollination Mechanisms of Coronilla emerus L. Flowers (Fabaceae). Scientific World Journal: 8. Atwater, M. M. and T. Lott. 2011. A SIMPLE TECHNIQUE TO SAMPLE POLLEN FROM MOTHS AND ITS APPLICATIONS TO ECOLOGICAL STUDIES. Journal of the Lepidopterists Society 65(4): 265-267. Atwood, J. T. 1985. POLLINATION OF PAPHIOPEDILUM-ROTHSCHILDIANUM - BROOD- SITE DECEPTION. National Geographic Research 1(2): 247-254. Avise, J. C. and F. J. Ayala. 2009. In the light of evolution III: Two centuries of Darwin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 9933-9938. Ayala, F. J. 2009. Darwin and the scientific method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 10033-10039. Ayasse, M. and J. Arroyo. 2011. Pollination and plant reproductive biology. Plant Biology 13: 1-6. Ayasse, M., F. P. Schiestl, H. F. Paulus, C. Lofstedt, B. Hansson, F. Ibarra and W. Francke. 2000. Evolution of reproductive strategies in the sexually deceptive orchid Ophrys sphegodes: How does flower-specific variation of odor signals influence reproductive success? Evolution 54(6): 1995-2006. Ayasse, M., J. Stokl and W. Francke. 2011. Chemical ecology and pollinator-driven speciation in sexually deceptive orchids. Phytochemistry 72(13): 1667-1677. Bai, Y. P., Y. W. Zhang, R. W. Gituru, J. M. Zhao and J. D. Li. 2011. Sexual differences in reproductive characters and pollinator attractiveness in gynodioecious Glechoma longituba (Lamiaceae). Plant Species Biology 26(1): 33-42. Banziger, H. 1996. The mesmerizing wart: The pollination strategy of epiphytic lady slipper orchid Paphiopedilum villosum (Lindl) Stein (Orchidaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 121(1): 59-90. Barrett, S. C. H. 2003. Mating strategies in flowering plants: The outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B- Biological
Recommended publications
  • CHAPTER 2 REVIEW of the LITERATURE 2.1 Taxa And

    CHAPTER 2 REVIEW of the LITERATURE 2.1 Taxa And

    CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 2.1 Taxa and Classification of Acalypha indica Linn., Bridelia retusa (L.) A. Juss. and Cleidion javanicum BL. 2.11 Taxa and Classification of Acalypha indica Linn. Kingdom : Plantae Division : Magnoliophyta Class : Magnoliopsida Order : Euphorbiales Family : Euphorbiaceae Subfamily : Acalyphoideae Genus : Acalypha Species : Acalypha indica Linn. (Saha and Ahmed, 2011) Plant Synonyms: Acalypha ciliata Wall., A. canescens Wall., A. spicata Forsk. (35) Common names: Brennkraut (German), alcalifa (Brazil) and Ricinela (Spanish) (36). 9 2.12 Taxa and Classification of Bridelia retusa (L.) A. Juss. Kingdom : Plantae Division : Magnoliophyta Class : Magnoliopsida Order : Malpighiales Family : Euphorbiaceae Genus : Bridelia Species : Bridelia retusa (L.) A. Juss. Plant Synonyms: Bridelia airy-shawii Li. Common names: Ekdania (37,38). 2.13 Taxa and Classification of Cleidion javanicum BL. Kingdom : Plantae Subkingdom : Tracheobionta Superdivision : Spermatophyta Division : Magnoliophyta Class : Magnoliopsida Subclass : Magnoliopsida Order : Malpighiales Family : Euphorbiaceae Genus : Cleidion Species : Cleidion javanicum BL. Plant Synonyms: Acalypha spiciflora Burm. f. , Lasiostylis salicifolia Presl. Cleidion spiciflorum (Burm.f.) Merr. Common names: Malayalam and Yellari (39). 10 2.2 Review of chemical composition and bioactivities of Acalypha indica Linn., Bridelia retusa (L.) A. Juss. and Cleidion javanicum BL. 2.2.1 Review of chemical composition and bioactivities of Acalypha indica Linn. Acalypha indica
  • News from the CREW

    News from the CREW

    Volume 6 • March 200 News from the CREW lthough 2009 has been a Asteraceae family) in full flower. REW, the Custodians of Areally challenging year with These plants are usually rather C Rare and Endangered the global recession having had inconspicuous and are very hard Wildflowers, is a programme a heavy impact on all of us, it to spot when not flowering, so that involves volunteers from we were very lucky to catch it could not break the strong spir- the public in the monitoring it of CREW. Amidst the great in flower. The CREW team has taken a special interest in the and conservation of South challenges we came up tops genus Marasmodes (we even Africa’s threatened plants. once again, with some excep- have a day in April dedicated to CREW aims to capacitate a tionally great discoveries. the monitoring of this genus) network of volunteers from as they all occur in the lowlands a range of socio-economic Our first great adventure for and are severely threatened. I backgrounds to monitor the year took place in the knew from the herbarium speci- and conserve South Afri- Villiersdorp area. We had to mens that there have not been ca’s threatened plant spe- collect flowering material of any collections of Marasmodes Prismatocarpus lycioides, a data cies. The programme links from the Villiersdorp area and volunteers with their local deficient species in the Campan- was therefore very excited conservation agencies and ulaceae family. We rediscovered about this discovery. As usual, this species in the area in 2008 my first reaction was: ‘It’s a particularly with local land and all we had to go on was a new species!’ but I soon so- stewardship initiatives to en- scrappy nonflowering branch.
  • Checklist of Common Native Plants the Diversity of Acadia National Park Is Refl Ected in Its Plant Life; More Than 1,100 Plant Species Are Found Here

    Checklist of Common Native Plants the Diversity of Acadia National Park Is Refl Ected in Its Plant Life; More Than 1,100 Plant Species Are Found Here

    National Park Service Acadia U.S. Department of the Interior Acadia National Park Checklist of Common Native Plants The diversity of Acadia National Park is refl ected in its plant life; more than 1,100 plant species are found here. This checklist groups the park’s most common plants into the communities where they are typically found. The plant’s growth form is indicated by “t” for trees and “s” for shrubs. To identify unfamiliar plants, consult a fi eld guide or visit the Wild Gardens of Acadia at Sieur de Monts Spring, where more than 400 plants are labeled and displayed in their habitats. All plants within Acadia National Park are protected. Please help protect the park’s fragile beauty by leaving plants in the condition that you fi nd them. Deciduous Woods ash, white t Fraxinus americana maple, mountain t Acer spicatum aspen, big-toothed t Populus grandidentata maple, red t Acer rubrum aspen, trembling t Populus tremuloides maple, striped t Acer pensylvanicum aster, large-leaved Aster macrophyllus maple, sugar t Acer saccharum beech, American t Fagus grandifolia mayfl ower, Canada Maianthemum canadense birch, paper t Betula papyrifera oak, red t Quercus rubra birch, yellow t Betula alleghaniesis pine, white t Pinus strobus blueberry, low sweet s Vaccinium angustifolium pyrola, round-leaved Pyrola americana bunchberry Cornus canadensis sarsaparilla, wild Aralia nudicaulis bush-honeysuckle s Diervilla lonicera saxifrage, early Saxifraga virginiensis cherry, pin t Prunus pensylvanica shadbush or serviceberry s,t Amelanchier spp. cherry, choke t Prunus virginiana Solomon’s seal, false Maianthemum racemosum elder, red-berried or s Sambucus racemosa ssp.
  • Apiales, Aquifoliales, Boraginales, , Brassicales, Canellales

    Apiales, Aquifoliales, Boraginales, , Brassicales, Canellales

    Kingdom: Plantae Phylum: Tracheophyta Class: Magnoliopsida Order: Apiales, Aquifoliales, Boraginales, , Brassicales, Canellales, Caryophyllales, Celastrales, Ericales, Fabales, Garryales, Gentianales, Lamiales, Laurales, Magnoliales, Malpighiales, Malvales, Myrtales, Oxalidales, Picramniales, Piperales, Proteales, Rosales, Santalales, Sapindales, Solanales Family: Achariaceae, Anacardiaceae, Annonaceae, Apocynaceae, Aquifoliaceae, Araliaceae, Bignoniaceae, Bixaceae, Boraginaceae, Burseraceae, Calophyllaceae, Canellaceae, Cannabaceae, Capparaceae, Cardiopteridaceae, Caricaceae, Caryocaraceae, Celastraceae, Chrysobalanaceae, Clusiaceae, Combretaceae, Dichapetalaceae, Ebenaceae, Elaeocarpaceae, Emmotaceae, Erythroxylaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae, Goupiaceae, Hernandiaceae, Humiriaceae, Hypericaceae, Icacinaceae, Ixonanthaceae, Lacistemataceae, Lamiaceae, Lauraceae, Lecythidaceae, Lepidobotryaceae, Linaceae, Loganiaceae, Lythraceae, Malpighiaceae, Malvaceae, Melastomataceae, Meliaceae, Monimiaceae, Moraceae, Myristicaceae, Myrtaceae, Nyctaginaceae, Ochnaceae, Olacaceae, Oleaceae, Opiliaceae, Pentaphylacaceae, Phyllanthaceae, Picramniaceae, Piperaceae, Polygonaceae, Primulaceae, Proteaceae, Putranjivaceae, Rhabdodendraceae, Rhamnaceae, Rhizophoraceae, Rosaceae, Rubiaceae, Rutaceae, Sabiaceae, Salicaceae, Sapindaceae, Sapotaceae, Simaroubaceae, Siparunaceae, Solanaceae, Stemonuraceae, Styracaceae, Symplocaceae, Ulmaceae, Urticaceae, Verbenaceae, Violaceae, Vochysiaceae Genus: Abarema, Acioa, Acosmium, Agonandra, Aiouea, Albizia, Alchornea,
  • Anchusa L. and Allied Genera (Boraginaceae) in Italy

    Anchusa L. and Allied Genera (Boraginaceae) in Italy

    Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology Official Journal of the Societa Botanica Italiana ISSN: 1126-3504 (Print) 1724-5575 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tplb20 Anchusa L. and allied genera (Boraginaceae) in Italy F. SELVI & M. BIGAZZI To cite this article: F. SELVI & M. BIGAZZI (1998) Anchusa L. and allied genera (Boraginaceae) in Italy, Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology, 132:2, 113-142, DOI: 10.1080/11263504.1998.10654198 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11263504.1998.10654198 Published online: 18 Mar 2013. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 29 View related articles Citing articles: 20 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tplb20 Download by: [Università di Pisa] Date: 05 November 2015, At: 02:31 PLANT BIOSYSTEMS, 132 (2) 113-142, 1998 Anchusa L. and allied genera (Boraginaceae) in Italy F. SEL VI and M. BIGAZZI received 18 May 1998; revised version accepted 30 July 1998 ABSTRACT - A revision of the Italian entities of Anchusa and of the rdated genera Anchusella, Lycopsis, Cynoglottis, Hormuzakia and Pentaglottis was carried out in view of the poor systematic knowledge of some entities of the national flora. The taxonomic treatment relies on a wide comparative basis, including macro- and micromorphological, karyological, chorological and ecological data. After a general description of some poorly known microCharacters of vegetative and reproductive structures, analytical keys, nomenclatural types, synonymies, descriptions, distribution maps and iconographies are provided for each entity.
  • Sistema De Clasificación Artificial De Las Magnoliatas Sinántropas De Cuba

    Sistema De Clasificación Artificial De Las Magnoliatas Sinántropas De Cuba

    Sistema de clasificación artificial de las magnoliatas sinántropas de Cuba. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver Tesis doctoral de la Univerisdad de Alicante. Tesi doctoral de la Universitat d'Alacant. 2007 Sistema de clasificación artificial de las magnoliatas sinántropas de Cuba. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver PROGRAMA DE DOCTORADO COOPERADO DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE: MANEJOS FORESTAL Y TURÍSTICO UNIVERSIDAD DE ALICANTE, ESPAÑA UNIVERSIDAD DE PINAR DEL RÍO, CUBA TESIS EN OPCIÓN AL GRADO CIENTÍFICO DE DOCTOR EN CIENCIAS SISTEMA DE CLASIFICACIÓN ARTIFICIAL DE LAS MAGNOLIATAS SINÁNTROPAS DE CUBA Pedro- Pabfc He.r retira Qltver CUBA 2006 Tesis doctoral de la Univerisdad de Alicante. Tesi doctoral de la Universitat d'Alacant. 2007 Sistema de clasificación artificial de las magnoliatas sinántropas de Cuba. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver PROGRAMA DE DOCTORADO COOPERADO DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE: MANEJOS FORESTAL Y TURÍSTICO UNIVERSIDAD DE ALICANTE, ESPAÑA Y UNIVERSIDAD DE PINAR DEL RÍO, CUBA TESIS EN OPCIÓN AL GRADO CIENTÍFICO DE DOCTOR EN CIENCIAS SISTEMA DE CLASIFICACIÓN ARTIFICIAL DE LAS MAGNOLIATAS SINÁNTROPAS DE CUBA ASPIRANTE: Lie. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver Investigador Auxiliar Centro Nacional de Biodiversidad Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática Ministerio de Ciencias, Tecnología y Medio Ambiente DIRECTORES: CUBA Dra. Nancy Esther Ricardo Ñapóles Investigador Titular Centro Nacional de Biodiversidad Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática Ministerio de Ciencias, Tecnología y Medio Ambiente ESPAÑA Dr. Andreu Bonet Jornet Piiofesjar Titular Departamento de EGdfegfe Universidad! dte Mearte CUBA 2006 Tesis doctoral de la Univerisdad de Alicante. Tesi doctoral de la Universitat d'Alacant. 2007 Sistema de clasificación artificial de las magnoliatas sinántropas de Cuba. Pedro Pablo Herrera Oliver I. INTRODUCCIÓN 1 II. ANTECEDENTES 6 2.1 Historia de los esquemas de clasificación de las especies sinántropas (1903-2005) 6 2.2 Historia del conocimiento de las plantas sinantrópicas en Cuba 14 III.
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny

    Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny

    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
  • Lepidoptera Sphingidae:) of the Caatinga of Northeast Brazil: a Case Study in the State of Rio Grande Do Norte

    Lepidoptera Sphingidae:) of the Caatinga of Northeast Brazil: a Case Study in the State of Rio Grande Do Norte

    212212 JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY Journal of the Lepidopterists’ Society 59(4), 2005, 212–218 THE HIGHLY SEASONAL HAWKMOTH FAUNA (LEPIDOPTERA SPHINGIDAE:) OF THE CAATINGA OF NORTHEAST BRAZIL: A CASE STUDY IN THE STATE OF RIO GRANDE DO NORTE JOSÉ ARAÚJO DUARTE JÚNIOR Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, 58059-900, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brasil. E-mail: [email protected] AND CLEMENS SCHLINDWEIN Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, s/n, Cidade Universitária, 50670-901, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil. E-mail:[email protected] ABSTRACT: The caatinga, a thorn-shrub succulent savannah, is located in Northeastern Brazil and characterized by a short and irregular rainy season and a severe dry season. Insects are only abundant during the rainy months, displaying a strong seasonal pat- tern. Here we present data from a yearlong Sphingidae survey undertaken in the reserve Estação Ecológica do Seridó, located in the state of Rio Grande do Norte. Hawkmoths were collected once a month during two subsequent new moon nights, between 18.00h and 05.00h, attracted with a 160-watt mercury vapor light. A total of 593 specimens belonging to 20 species and 14 genera were col- lected. Neogene dynaeus, Callionima grisescens, and Hyles euphorbiarum were the most abundant species, together comprising up to 82.2% of the total number of specimens collected. These frequent species are residents of the caatinga of Rio Grande do Norte. The rare Sphingidae in this study, Pseudosphinx tetrio, Isognathus australis, and Cocytius antaeus, are migratory species for the caatinga.
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018

    State of New York City's Plants 2018

    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
  • Of Connecting Plants and People

    Of Connecting Plants and People

    THE NEWSLEttER OF THE SINGAPORE BOTANIC GARDENS VOLUME 34, JANUARY 2010 ISSN 0219-1688 of connecting plants and people p13 Collecting & conserving Thai Convolvulaceae p2 Sowing the seeds of conservation in an oil palm plantation p8 Spindle gingers – jewels of Singapores forests p24 VOLUME 34, JANUARY 2010 Message from the director Chin See Chung ARTICLES 2 Collecting & conserving Thai Convolvulaceae George Staples 6 Spotlight on research: a PhD project on Convolvulaceae George Staples 8 Sowing the seeds of conservation in an oil palm plantation Paul Leong, Serena Lee 12 Propagation of a very rare orchid, Khoo-Woon Mui Hwang, Lim-Ho Chee Len Robiquetia spathulata Whang Lay Keng, Ali bin Ibrahim 150 years of connecting plants and people: Terri Oh 2 13 The making of stars Two minds, one theory - Wallace & Darwin, the two faces of evolution theory I do! I do! I do! One evening, two stellar performances In Search of Gingers Botanical diplomacy The art of botanical painting Fugitives fleurs: a unique perspective on floral fragments Falling in love Born in the Gardens A garden dialogue - Reminiscences of the Gardens 8 Children celebrate! Botanical party Of saints, ships and suspense Birthday wishes for the Gardens REGULAR FEATURES Around the Gardens 21 Convolvulaceae taxonomic workshop George Staples What’s Blooming 18 22 Upside down or right side up? The baobab tree Nura Abdul Karim Ginger and its Allies 24 Spindle gingers – jewels of Singapores forests Jana Leong-Škornicková From Education Outreach 26 “The Green Sheep” – a first for babies and toddlers at JBCG Janice Yau 27 International volunteers at the Jacob Ballas Children’s Garden Winnie Wong, Janice Yau From Taxonomy Corner 28 The puzzling bathroom bubbles plant..
  • Winter 2014-2015 (22:3) (PDF)

    Winter 2014-2015 (22:3) (PDF)

    Contents NATIVE NOTES Page Fern workshop 1-2 Wavey-leaf basket Grass 3 Names Cacalia 4 Trip Report Sandstone Falls 5 Kate’s Mountain Clover* Trip Report Brush Creek Falls 6 Thank yous memorial 7 WEST VIRGINIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY NEWSLETTER News of WVNPS 8 VOLUME 22:3 WINTER 2014-15 Events, Dues Form 9 Judy Dumke-Editor: [email protected] Phone 740-894-6859 Magnoliales 10 e e e visit us at www.wvnps.org e e e . Fern Workshop University of Charleston Charleston WV January 17 2015, bad weather date January 24 2015 If you have thought about ferns, looked at them, puzzled over them or just want to know more about them join the WVNPS in Charleston for a workshop led by Mark Watson of the University of Charleston. The session will start at 10 A.M. with a scheduled end point by 12:30 P.M. A board meeting will follow. The sessions will be held in the Clay Tower Building (CTB) room 513, which is the botany lab. If you have any pressed specimens to share, or to ask about, be sure to bring them with as much information as you have on the location and habitat. Even photographs of ferns might be of interest for the session. If you have a hand lens that you favor bring it along as well. DIRECTIONS From the North: Travel I-77 South or 1-79 South into Charleston. Follow the signs to I-64 West. Take Oakwood Road Exit 58A and follow the signs to Route 61 South (MacCorkle Ave.).
  • ! 2013 Elena Tartaglia ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

    ! 2013 Elena Tartaglia ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

    !"#$%&" '()*+",+-.+/(0+" 122"3456,7"3'7'38'9" HAWKMOTH – FLOWER INTERACTIONS IN THE URBAN LANDSCAPE: SPHINGIDAE ECOLOGY, WITH A FOCUS ON THE GENUS HEMARIS By ELENA S. TARTAGLIA A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Ecology and Evolution written under the direction of Dr. Steven N. Handel and approved by ________________________________________! ________________________________________ ________________________________________ ________________________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey May 2013 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Hawkmoth-Flower Interactions in the Urban Landscape: Sphingidae Ecology, With a Focus on the Genus Hemaris by ELENA S. TARTAGLIA Dissertation Director: Steven N. Handel ! In this dissertation I examined the ecology of moths of the family Sphingidae in New Jersey and elucidated some previously unknown aspects of their behavior as floral visitors. In Chapter 2, I investigated differences in moth abundance and diversity between urban and suburban habitat types. Suburban sites have higher moth abundance and diversity than urban sites. I compared nighttime light intensities across all sites to correlate increased nighttime light intensity with moth abundance and diversity. Urban sites had significantly higher nighttime light intensity, a factor that has been shown to negatively affect the behavior of moths. I analyzed moths’ diets based on pollen grains swabbed from the moths’ bodies. These data were inconclusive due to insufficient sample sizes. In Chapter 3, I examined similar questions regarding diurnal Sphingidae of the genus Hemaris and found that suburban sites had higher moth abundances and diversities than urban sites.