DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecological and Hydrogeological Survey of the Great Artesian Basin Springs - Springsure, Eulo, Bourke and Bogan River Supergroups

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecological and Hydrogeological Survey of the Great Artesian Basin Springs - Springsure, Eulo, Bourke and Bogan River Supergroups Knowledge report Ecological and hydrogeological survey of the Great Artesian Basin springs - Springsure, Eulo, Bourke and Bogan River supergroups Volume 2: hydrogeological profiles This report was commissioned by the Department of the Environment on the advice of the Interim Independent Expert Scientific Committee on Coal Seam Gas and Coal Mining. The review was prepared by UniQuest and revised by the Department of the Environment following peer review. September 2014 Ecological and hydrogeological survey of the Great Artesian Basin springs – Volume 2 Copyright © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2014. Ecological and hydrogeological survey of the Great Artesian Basin springs - Springsure, Eulo, Bourke and Bogan River Supergroups, Volume 2: hydrogeological profiles, Knowledge report is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons By Attribution 3.0 Australia licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/ This report should be attributed as ‘Commonwealth of Australia 2014, Ecological and hydrogeological survey of the Great Artesian Basin springs - Springsure, Eulo, Bourke and Bogan River Supergroups. Volume 2: hydrogeological profiles, Knowledge report, prepared by UniQuest for the Department of the Environment, Commonwealth of Australia’. The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Department of the Environment, Public Affairs GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601 Or by email to: [email protected] This publication can be accessed at: www.iesc.environment.gov.au Acknowledgements This knowledge report was commissioned by the Department of the Environment on the advice of the Interim Independent Expert Scientific Committee on Coal Seam Gas and Coal Mining. The report was prepared by UniQuest with input from: • A/Prof Rod Fensham – School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland • Prof Joan Esterle – School of Earth Sciences, University of Queensland • Dr Sue Vink – Centre for Water in the Minerals Industry, University of Queensland • Ms Alexandra Wolhuter – Centre for Water in the Minerals Industry, University of Queensland • Ms Jennifer Silcock – School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland • Ms Kimberley Hines – School of Earth Sciences, University of Queensland • Mr Jeremy Drimer – QLD Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation & the Arts It was revised by the Department of the Environment following peer review by Dr MA (Rien) Habermehl (Consultant Hydrogeologist) and relevant Queensland, New South Wales and South Australian Government departments. page iii Ecological and hydrogeological survey of the Great Artesian Basin springs – Volume 2 Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment or the Interim Independent Expert Scientific Committee on Coal Seam Gas and Coal Mining or the statutory Independent Expert Scientific Committee on Coal Seam Gas and Large Coal Mining Development (IESC). While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth and IESC do not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. page iv Ecological and hydrogeological survey of the Great Artesian Basin springs – Volume 2 Contents Copyright ............................................................................................................................................. iii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. iii Disclaimer ............................................................................................................................................ iv Contents .................................................................................................................................................. v Summary ................................................................................................................................................ vii Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................................... x Glossary................................................................................................................................................... xi 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Springsure supergroup, Queensland ................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Lucky Last, Spring Rock Creek and Abyss spring complex ...................................................... 3 2.2 Scott’s Creek spring complex ................................................................................................... 20 2.3 Cockatoo Creek spring complex .............................................................................................. 35 2.4 Boggomoss spring complex ..................................................................................................... 55 2.5 Dawson River 2 spring complex .............................................................................................. 74 2.6 Dawson River 6 spring complex .............................................................................................. 91 2.7 Dawson River 8 spring complex ............................................................................................ 109 3 Eulo supergroup, Queensland ........................................................................................................ 121 3.1 Yowah Creek spring complex ................................................................................................ 121 3.2 Dead Sea springs complex .................................................................................................... 133 3.3 Carpet spring complex ........................................................................................................... 145 3.4 Eulo Town spring complex ..................................................................................................... 161 3.5 Merimo spring complex .......................................................................................................... 175 3.6 Granite spring complex .......................................................................................................... 187 3.7 Tunga spring complex ............................................................................................................ 197 3.8 Wooregym spring complex ..................................................................................................... 210 4 Bourke supergroup, New South Wales and Queensland .............................................................. 223 4.1 Peery Lakes ........................................................................................................................... 223 4.2 Sweetwater............................................................................................................................. 230 4.3 Thooro Mud ............................................................................................................................ 242 4.4 Tego ....................................................................................................................................... 253 4.5 Towry ...................................................................................................................................... 261 5 Bogan River supergroup, New South Wales .................................................................................. 271 5.1 Coorigul .................................................................................................................................. 271 5.2 Cumborah ............................................................................................................................... 277 5.3 Cuddie .................................................................................................................................... 287 5.4 Coolabah ................................................................................................................................ 297 page v Ecological and hydrogeological survey of the Great Artesian Basin springs – Volume 2 6 References ..................................................................................................................................... 305 Appendix A: Queensland licence ........................................................................................................ 307 page vi Ecological and hydrogeological survey of the Great Artesian Basin springs – Volume 2 Summary This project report describes the surveys of 848 springs in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Porosity and Permeability Lab
    Mrs. Keadle JH Science Porosity and Permeability Lab The terms porosity and permeability are related. porosity – the amount of empty space in a rock or other earth substance; this empty space is known as pore space. Porosity is how much water a substance can hold. Porosity is usually stated as a percentage of the material’s total volume. permeability – is how well water flows through rock or other earth substance. Factors that affect permeability are how large the pores in the substance are and how well the particles fit together. Water flows between the spaces in the material. If the spaces are close together such as in clay based soils, the water will tend to cling to the material and not pass through it easily or quickly. If the spaces are large, such as in the gravel, the water passes through quickly. There are two other terms that are used with water: percolation and infiltration. percolation – the downward movement of water from the land surface into soil or porous rock. infiltration – when the water enters the soil surface after falling from the atmosphere. In this lab, we will test the permeability and porosity of sand, gravel, and soil. Hypothesis Which material do you think will have the highest permeability (fastest time)? ______________ Which material do you think will have the lowest permeability (slowest time)? _____________ Which material do you think will have the highest porosity (largest spaces)? _______________ Which material do you think will have the lowest porosity (smallest spaces)? _______________ 1 Porosity and Permeability Lab Mrs. Keadle JH Science Materials 2 large cups (one with hole in bottom) water marker pea gravel timer yard soil (not potting soil) calculator sand spoon or scraper Procedure for measuring porosity 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrochemical Zoning and Chemical Evolution of the Deep Upper Jurassic Thermal Groundwater Reservoir Using Water Chemical and Environmental Isotope Data
    water Article Hydrochemical Zoning and Chemical Evolution of the Deep Upper Jurassic Thermal Groundwater Reservoir Using Water Chemical and Environmental Isotope Data Florian Heine * , Kai Zosseder and Florian Einsiedl * Chair of Hydrogeology, Department of Civil, Geo and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstr. 21, 80333 Munich, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: fl[email protected] (F.H.); [email protected] (F.E.); Tel.: +49-(89)-289-25833 (F.E.) Abstract: A comprehensive hydrogeological understanding of the deep Upper Jurassic carbonate aquifer, which represents an important geothermal reservoir in the South German Molasse Basin (SGMB), is crucial for improved and sustainable groundwater resource management. Water chemical data and environmental isotope analyses of δD, δ18O and 87Sr/86Sr were obtained from groundwater of 24 deep Upper Jurassic geothermal wells and coupled with a few analyses of noble gases (3He/4He, 40Ar/36Ar) and noble gas infiltration temperatures. Hierarchical cluster analysis revealed three major water types and allowed a hydrochemical zoning of the SGMB, while exploratory factor analyses identified the hydrogeological processes affecting the water chemical composition of the thermal water. Water types 1 and 2 are of Na-[Ca]-HCO3-Cl type, lowly mineralised and have been recharged 87 86 under meteoric cold climate conditions. Both water types show Sr/ Sr signatures, stable water isotopes values and calculated apparent mean residence times, which suggest minor water-rock Citation: Heine, F.; Zosseder, K.; interaction within a hydraulically active flow system of the Northeastern and Southeastern Central Einsiedl, F. Hydrochemical Zoning Molasse Basin. This thermal groundwater have been most likely subglacially recharged in the south and Chemical Evolution of the Deep of the SGMB in close proximity to the Bavarian Alps with a delineated northwards flow direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage of the Birdsville and Strzelecki Tracks
    Department for Environment and Heritage Heritage of the Birdsville and Strzelecki Tracks Part of the Far North & Far West Region (Region 13) Historical Research Pty Ltd Adelaide in association with Austral Archaeology Pty Ltd Lyn Leader-Elliott Iris Iwanicki December 2002 Frontispiece Woolshed, Cordillo Downs Station (SHP:009) The Birdsville & Strzelecki Tracks Heritage Survey was financed by the South Australian Government (through the State Heritage Fund) and the Commonwealth of Australia (through the Australian Heritage Commission). It was carried out by heritage consultants Historical Research Pty Ltd, in association with Austral Archaeology Pty Ltd, Lyn Leader-Elliott and Iris Iwanicki between April 2001 and December 2002. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the South Australian Government or the Commonwealth of Australia and they do not accept responsibility for any advice or information in relation to this material. All recommendations are the opinions of the heritage consultants Historical Research Pty Ltd (or their subconsultants) and may not necessarily be acted upon by the State Heritage Authority or the Australian Heritage Commission. Information presented in this document may be copied for non-commercial purposes including for personal or educational uses. Reproduction for purposes other than those given above requires written permission from the South Australian Government or the Commonwealth of Australia. Requests and enquiries should be addressed to either the Manager, Heritage Branch, Department for Environment and Heritage, GPO Box 1047, Adelaide, SA, 5001, or email [email protected], or the Manager, Copyright Services, Info Access, GPO Box 1920, Canberra, ACT, 2601, or email [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Storage Dynamics in the World's
    Interactive comment on “Groundwater storage dynamics in the world’s large aquifer systems from GRACE: uncertainty and role of extreme precipitation” by Mohammad Shamsudduha and Richard G. Taylor Marc Bierkens (Referee #1) [email protected] Received and published: 2 January 2020 Reviewer’s comments are italicised, and our responses (R) and revisions (REVISION) are provided in normal fonts. General comments The authors use the results of three different GRACE-based TWS methods and 4 Land surface models to generate an ensemble of groundwater storage anomalies. These are subsequently analyzed by a non-parametric statistical method to separate seasonal signals from non-linear trends and residuals. The main message of the paper is that trends in GWS anomalies (ΔGWS), if existing, are non-linear in the vast majority of main aquifer systems and that rainfall anomalies play an important role in explaining these non-linear trends. I enjoyed reading the paper. I find that it is a well-written with an important message that deserves publication. However, I have a few comments. Moderate comments: 1. I find the lack of reference to estimates based on global hydrological models (GHMS) remarkable. The first spatially distributed global assessment of depletion rates where based on such models and, albeit indirect, should be used in the discussion. They are the basis for the “narratives on global groundwater depletion” that are mentioned in the discussion and the abstract (See https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748- 9326/ab1a5f/meta for an overview of these studies). This is the more remarkable, given that the authors do use Land Surface Models (LSMs) to estimate ΔGWS from GRACE ΔTWS.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology of Flowing Artesian Wells in Northwest Ohio
    Hydrogeology of Flowing Artesian Wells in Northwest Ohio By Curtis J Coe, CPG and Jim Raab Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Resources June 2016 Bulletin 48 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Site Location and Setting .................................................................................................. 1 1.2 ODH Water Well Regulations for Flowing Artesian Wells ............................................. 3 1.3 Purpose and Scope of Work .............................................................................................. 3 2.0 Previous Work ....................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Bedrock Hydrogeology ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Glacial Hydrogeolgy ......................................................................................................... 8 2.2.1 Williams Complex Aquifer ....................................................................................... 8 2.2.2 Williams End Moraine Aquifer ................................................................................. 8 2.2.3 Buried Valley Aquifers ............................................................................................ 13 2.2.4 Lake Maumee Lacustrine Aquifer ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater and Global Change: Trends, Opportunities and Challenges
    SIDE PUBLICATIONS SERIES :01 Groundwater and Global Change: Trends, Opportunities and Challenges Jac van der Gun UNITED NATIONS WORLD WATER ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME Published in 2012 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 7, Place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France © UNESCO 2012 All rights reserved ISBN 978-92-3-001049-2 The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. Photographs: Cover: © africa924 / Shutterstock © Rolffimages / Dreamstime © Frontpage / Shutterstock.com p.i: © holgs / iStockphoto p.ii: © Andrew Zarivny p.2: © Aivolie / Shutterstock p.4: © Jorg Hackemann / Shutterstock p.17: © Jac van der Gun p.31: © Aivolie / Shutterstock p.33: © Hilde Vanstraelen Original concept (cover and layout design) of series: MH Design / Maro Haas Layout: Pica Publishing LTD, London–Paris / Roberto Rossi Printed by: UNESCO Printed in France Groundwater and global change: Trends, opportunities and challenges Author: Jac van der Gun Contributors: Luiz Amore (National Water Agency, Brazil), Greg Christelis (Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Forestry, Nambia), Todd Jarvis (Oregon State University, USA), Neno Kukuric (UNESCO-IGRAC) Júlio Thadeu Kettelhut (Ministry of the Environment, Brazil), Alexandros Makarigakis (UNESCO, Ethiopia), Abdullah Abdulkader Noaman (Sana’a University, Yemen), Cheryl van Kempen (UNESCO-IGRAC), Frank van Weert (UNESCO-IGRAC).
    [Show full text]
  • Do You Drink It? 9-12
    DO YOU DRINK IT? 9-12 SUBJECTS: Science (Physical Science, Ecology, Earth Science), Social Studies (Geography) TIME: 2 class periods MATERIALS: 3-liter soda bottles aquarium gravel sand (coarse) pump from liquid dispenser blue, yellow & Red food coloring paper cups straws student sheets droppers scissors or razor blades markers OBJECTIVES The student will do the following: 1. Create an aquifer model. 2. Locate major U.S. aquifers. 3. Explain how a well works. 4. Examine a well’s relationship to the water table. 5. Apply principles of well placement. 6. Explain different ways that groundwater is contaminated. 4-37 BACKGROUND INFORMATION An aquifer is an underground layer of rock or soil that holds the water called groundwater. The word “aquifer” is derived from the Latin “aqua” meaning “water ,”and “ferre” meaning “to bring” or “to yield.” The ability of a geological formation to yield water depends on two factors - porosity and permeability. Porosity is determined by how much water the soil or rock can hold in the spaces between its particles. Permeability means how interconnected the spaces are so that water can flow freely between them. There are two types of aquifers. One is a confined aquifer, in which a water supply is sandwiched between two impermeable layers. These are sometimes called artesian aquifers because, when a well is drilled into this layer, the pressure may be so great that water will spurt to the surface without being pumped. This is an artesian well. The other type of aquifer is the unconfined aquifer, which has an impermeable layer under it but not above it.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Levels in Major Artesian Aquifers of the New Jersey Coastal Plain, 1988
    WATER LEVELS IN MAJOR ARTESIAN AQUIFERS OF THE NEW JERSEY COASTAL PLAIN, 1988 By Robert Rosman, Pierre J. Lacombe, and Donald A. Storck U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4060 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION West Trenton, New Jersey 1995 CONTENTS Page Abstract............................................................. 1 Introduction......................................................... 2 Purpose and scope............................................... 2 Study area...................................................... 2 Previous investigations......................................... 4 Well-numbering system........................................... 4 Methods of data collection...................................... 5 Description of data presented................................... 6 Acknowledgments................................................. 8 Hydrogeology of the Coastal Plain.................................... 8 Description of aquifers and confining units..................... 11 Location of freshwater/saltwater interface...................... 12 Water levels in artesian aquifers of the Coastal Plain............... 13 Cohansey aquifer in Cape May County............................. 13 Water levels............................................... 13 Water-level fluctuations................................... 13 Atlantic City 800-foot sand..................................... 14 Water levels............................................... 14 Water-level
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Management Manual
    Procedure Document No. 2617 Document Title Environment Management Manual Area HSE Issue Date 23 August 2017 Major Process Environment Sub Process Management Review Authoriser Jacqui McGill – Asset President Version Number 16 Olympic Dam 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Glossary and defined terms ................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Purpose and scope .............................................................................................................. 3 1.3 How to use the EPMP .......................................................................................................... 4 2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ..................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Key legal requirements ........................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Compliance with routine reporting obligations ..................................................................... 6 2.3 Amendments to the EPMP ................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Environmental outcomes and criteria .................................................................................. 7 2.5 Enforcement process (Indenture and Mining Code) ............................................................ 7 2.6 ALARA and best practicable
    [Show full text]
  • Causes of Groundwater Depletion
    Number 63 Issue Paper February 2019 Aquifer Depletion and Potential Impacts on Long-term Irrigated Agricultural Productivity When developing policies that regulate groundwater systems that are being depleted, the potential consequences of groundwater depletion need to be fully assessed to determine the trade-offs that exist between the undesired impacts of groundwater depletion and whether these impacts outweigh the benefits associated with groundwater use. (Photo from Ed Hennigan/Shutterstock.) is even higher in arid and semi-arid ar- the Mississippi Embayment Aquifer ABSTRACT eas, where the only consistent source of (Mississippi River lowlands bordering Groundwater is the Earth’s most irrigation water is groundwater. In these Arkansas and Mississippi), aquifers in extracted raw material, with almost regions, however, the use of groundwa- southern Arizona, and smaller aquifers 1,000 cubic kilometers per year (800 ter typically far exceeds the rate at which in many western states. million acre-feet per year) of ground- it is naturally replenished, indicating The groundwater resource with the water pumped from aquifers around the that these critical groundwater resources greatest long-term depletion is the High world. Approximately 70% of ground- are being slowly depleted. Within the Plains (Ogallala) aquifer in the Great water withdrawals worldwide are used to United States, groundwater depletion has Plains Region of the United States, support agricultural production systems, occurred in many important agricultural where groundwater levels have declined and within the United States, about 71% production regions, including the Great by more than 50 meters (150 feet) of groundwater withdrawals are used for Plains Region (Nebraska, Colorado, in some areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement of Earth Syst
    Supplement of Earth Syst. Dynam., 11, 755–774, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-755-2020-supplement © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Supplement of Groundwater storage dynamics in the world’s large aquifer systems from GRACE: uncertainty and role of extreme precipitation Mohammad Shamsudduha and Richard G. Taylor Correspondence to: Mohammad Shamsudduha ([email protected]) The copyright of individual parts of the supplement might differ from the CC BY 4.0 License. Supplementary Table S1. Characteristics of the world’s 37 large aquifer systems according to the WHYMAP database including aquifer area, total number of population, proportion of groundwater (GW)-fed irrigation, mean aridity index, mean annual rainfall, variability in rainfall and total terrestrial water mass (ΔTWS), and correlation coefficients between monthly ΔTWS and precipitation with reported lags. ) 2 2) Correlation between between Correlation precipitation TWS and (lag in month) GW irrigation (%) (%) GW irrigation on based zones Climate Aridity indices Mean (2002-16) annual precipitation (mm) Rainfall variability (%) (cm TWS variance WHYMAP aquifer number name Aquifer Continent (million)Population area (km Aquifer Nubian Sandstone Hyper- 1 Africa 86.01 2,176,068 1.6 30 12.1 1.5 0.16 (13) Aquifer System arid Northwestern 2 Sahara Aquifer Africa 5.93 1,007,536 4.4 Arid 69 17.3 1.9 0.19 (8) System Murzuk-Djado Hyper- 3 Africa 0.35 483,817 2.3 8 36.6 1.3 0.20 (-8) Basin arid Taoudeni- Hyper- 4 Africa 0.35
    [Show full text]
  • Flowing Artesian Wells
    Flowing Artesian Wells Water Stewardship Information Series Table of Contents What’s the difference between a flowing artesian well Are there specific actions to avoid when flowing artesian and an artesian well? . 1 conditions are present? . 6 Why do wells flow? . 1 How can flowing artesian well be constructed in bedrock aquifers? . 7 Why is stopping or controlling artesian flow important? . 2 How can flowing artesian well be constructed in How can flowing artesian conditions be determined unconsolidated aquifers? . 7 before drilling? . 2 What should be done if flowing artesian conditions are What are the provincial regulatory requirements for suddenly encountered? . 7 controlling or stopping artesian flow? . 2 What are the key factors in completing and equipping What does it mean to “control” artesian flow from a well? . 3 a flowing artesian well? . 8 Will a flowing artesian well dry up if the flow is stopped How is the pressure or static water level for a flowing or controlled? . 3 artesian well measured? . 8 Are there any water quality concerns with flowing How should flowing artesian wells be closed? . 8 artesian wells? . 3 How is a flowing artesian well disinfected? . 9 Are there any other concerns with flowing artesian wells? . 3 Further Information . 9 What can be done with an existing flowing well? . 4 What if the flow is needed, for example, to increase the baseflow of a creek or stream? . 4 Are there some general guidelines for constructing a flowing artesian well? . 4 What are the key issues to be aware of when drilling a flowing artesian well? . 5 This booklet contains general information on flowing artesian wells for well drillers, groundwater consultants and well owners Hydrostatic head (or confining pressure) is the vertical in British Columbia .
    [Show full text]