DOCSLIB.ORG

A Public Interest Map for Queensland Government Bodies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Public Interest Map for Queensland Government Bodies Brokering Balance: A Public Interest Map for Queensland Government Bodies An Independent Review of Queensland Government Boards, Committees and Statutory Authorities Part B Report by the Independent Reviewers: Ms Simone Webbe and Professor Patrick Weller AO March 2009 i Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 4 2. Executive Summary .................................................................................... 9 3. A Public Interest Map for Queensland Government Bodies ..................... 11 3.1 Reducing bureaucracy and red tape ............................................. 13 3.1.1 Meanings ............................................................................... 13 3.1.2 Causes ................................................................................... 14 3.1.3 A Public Interest Map in response ............................................ 16 3.2 The Threshold Test ........................................................................ 21 3.2.1 Threshold Questions ............................................................... 21 3.2.2 Public Interest Case ................................................................ 23 3.2.3 Sunset or Review .................................................................... 24 3.3 The Organisational Form Guide .................................................... 30 3.3.1 Committees and Councils ........................................................ 32 3.3.2 Statutory Authorities and Statutory Bodies ................................ 39 3.3.3 Corporations Sole ................................................................... 41 3.3.4 Trusts .................................................................................... 41 3.3.5 Companies ............................................................................. 42 3.3.6 Board, or no board ................................................................. 48 3.4 The Good Governance Framework ................................................ 50 3.4.1 Role of Parliament .................................................................. 55 3.4.2 Public Servants on Boards ....................................................... 55 3.5 In review of bodies ....................................................................... 58 4. Economic .................................................................................................. 61 4.1 Commercial ................................................................................... 61 4.2 Financial ........................................................................................ 69 4.3 Industrial Relations ...................................................................... 71 4.4 Tourism ......................................................................................... 79 4.5 Trade ............................................................................................. 81 Brokering Balance: A Public Interest Map for Queensland Government Bodies Contents ii 5. Environment and Resources .................................................................... 85 5.1 Water ............................................................................................ 85 5.2 Primary Industries ........................................................................ 93 5.3 Natural Resources ....................................................................... 100 5.4 Environmental and Sustainability ............................................... 103 5.5 Land ............................................................................................ 112 6. Infrastructure ........................................................................................ 117 6.1 Main Roads .................................................................................. 118 6.2 Transport ..................................................................................... 121 6.3 Planning ...................................................................................... 126 7. Law and Justice ...................................................................................... 137 7.1 Legal ............................................................................................ 137 7.2 Police ........................................................................................... 145 7.3 Corrective Services ..................................................................... 146 7.4 Licensing ..................................................................................... 147 8. Social ...................................................................................................... 149 8.1 Arts/Culture ................................................................................ 150 8.2 Communities ............................................................................... 159 8.3 Education and Training ............................................................... 171 8.4 Emergency Services .................................................................... 181 8.5 Health/Medical ........................................................................... 183 8.6 Housing ....................................................................................... 197 8.7 Sport ........................................................................................... 198 9. Brokering Balance: A future perspective ............................................... 201 Brokering Balance: A Public Interest Map for Queensland Government Bodies Contents iii Figures Figure 3.1 A Public Interest Map for Queensland Government Bodies .................... 19 Figure 3.2 Spectrum of function, autonomy and form ........................................... 30 Figure 3.3 Board Model Indicator ........................................................................ 49 Figure A.1 Public Interest Map for Queensland Government Bodies – Summary Form ............................................................................. 204 Figure A.2 Public Interest Map for Queensland Government Bodies – Concept Form ............................................................................... 205 Figure A.3 Threshold Test ................................................................................ 207 Figure A.4 Public Interest Risk Principles Guide .................................................. 209 Figure A.5 Organisational Form Guide ............................................................... 211 Figure A.6 Board Model Indicator ...................................................................... 214 Appendices Appendix A A Public Interest Map for Queensland Government Bodies .................. 203 Appendix B Recommendations for change to current bodies captured by the Review............................................................................................. 224 Appendix C Appointment process to Queensland Government Boards, Committees and Statutory Authorities .................................................................. 249 Appendix D List of Government Bodies for Inclusion in Review (by portfolio) ......... 251 Appendix E List of Submissions - Terms of Reference and the Part A Report .......... 265 Appendix F Terms of Reference: Review of Government Boards, Committees and Statutory Authorities ....................................................................... 268 Bibliography ............................................................................................ 269 Brokering Balance: A Public Interest Map for Queensland Government Bodies Contents 4 1. Introduction Last year, the Premier of Queensland announced a major public sector reform program with five new public sector reform initiatives. One of the five reform initiatives was this Review of Queensland Government Boards, Committees and Statutory Authorities. The Premier said the public sector reform initiatives would result in the most wide ranging changes to the Queensland public sector than any in the past decade. The reform objective was to ‘create a more modern, efficient, and effective public service’ with the review of government bodies to reduce ‘both number and cost’. The Premier said, ‘I want to cut unnecessary red tape and identify and free up people and funding for the delivery of core public services’.1 The purpose of this Review is to reduce bureaucracy and red tape, whilst improving efficiency and maintaining regulatory integrity.2 The Review commenced in July 2008 and was conducted in two parts. Part A was required to consider the current framework of government bodies and recommend a governance decision-making model for improving the relevance, efficiency and effectiveness of the roles and functions currently performed by government bodies. On 1 December 2008, the Reviewers released a report for public consultation. The report, A Public Interest Map: An Independent Review of Queensland Government Boards, Committees and Statutory Authorities (the Part A Report), made preliminary recommendations for a Public Interest Map decision-making model for both review of the 4593 government bodies within its scope and as a future framework for public sector governance of non-departmental government bodies in Queensland. The terms of reference for Part B required in respect of its list of 459 government bodies- Informed by the recommended option delivered in Part A, Part B will identify and recommend to the Premier: • those government bodies that are working efficiently;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hydrochemical Zoning and Chemical Evolution of the Deep Upper Jurassic Thermal Groundwater Reservoir Using Water Chemical and Environmental Isotope Data
    water Article Hydrochemical Zoning and Chemical Evolution of the Deep Upper Jurassic Thermal Groundwater Reservoir Using Water Chemical and Environmental Isotope Data Florian Heine * , Kai Zosseder and Florian Einsiedl * Chair of Hydrogeology, Department of Civil, Geo and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstr. 21, 80333 Munich, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: fl[email protected] (F.H.); [email protected] (F.E.); Tel.: +49-(89)-289-25833 (F.E.) Abstract: A comprehensive hydrogeological understanding of the deep Upper Jurassic carbonate aquifer, which represents an important geothermal reservoir in the South German Molasse Basin (SGMB), is crucial for improved and sustainable groundwater resource management. Water chemical data and environmental isotope analyses of δD, δ18O and 87Sr/86Sr were obtained from groundwater of 24 deep Upper Jurassic geothermal wells and coupled with a few analyses of noble gases (3He/4He, 40Ar/36Ar) and noble gas infiltration temperatures. Hierarchical cluster analysis revealed three major water types and allowed a hydrochemical zoning of the SGMB, while exploratory factor analyses identified the hydrogeological processes affecting the water chemical composition of the thermal water. Water types 1 and 2 are of Na-[Ca]-HCO3-Cl type, lowly mineralised and have been recharged 87 86 under meteoric cold climate conditions. Both water types show Sr/ Sr signatures, stable water isotopes values and calculated apparent mean residence times, which suggest minor water-rock Citation: Heine, F.; Zosseder, K.; interaction within a hydraulically active flow system of the Northeastern and Southeastern Central Einsiedl, F. Hydrochemical Zoning Molasse Basin. This thermal groundwater have been most likely subglacially recharged in the south and Chemical Evolution of the Deep of the SGMB in close proximity to the Bavarian Alps with a delineated northwards flow direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage of the Birdsville and Strzelecki Tracks
    Department for Environment and Heritage Heritage of the Birdsville and Strzelecki Tracks Part of the Far North & Far West Region (Region 13) Historical Research Pty Ltd Adelaide in association with Austral Archaeology Pty Ltd Lyn Leader-Elliott Iris Iwanicki December 2002 Frontispiece Woolshed, Cordillo Downs Station (SHP:009) The Birdsville & Strzelecki Tracks Heritage Survey was financed by the South Australian Government (through the State Heritage Fund) and the Commonwealth of Australia (through the Australian Heritage Commission). It was carried out by heritage consultants Historical Research Pty Ltd, in association with Austral Archaeology Pty Ltd, Lyn Leader-Elliott and Iris Iwanicki between April 2001 and December 2002. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the South Australian Government or the Commonwealth of Australia and they do not accept responsibility for any advice or information in relation to this material. All recommendations are the opinions of the heritage consultants Historical Research Pty Ltd (or their subconsultants) and may not necessarily be acted upon by the State Heritage Authority or the Australian Heritage Commission. Information presented in this document may be copied for non-commercial purposes including for personal or educational uses. Reproduction for purposes other than those given above requires written permission from the South Australian Government or the Commonwealth of Australia. Requests and enquiries should be addressed to either the Manager, Heritage Branch, Department for Environment and Heritage, GPO Box 1047, Adelaide, SA, 5001, or email [email protected], or the Manager, Copyright Services, Info Access, GPO Box 1920, Canberra, ACT, 2601, or email [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Storage Dynamics in the World's
    Interactive comment on “Groundwater storage dynamics in the world’s large aquifer systems from GRACE: uncertainty and role of extreme precipitation” by Mohammad Shamsudduha and Richard G. Taylor Marc Bierkens (Referee #1) [email protected] Received and published: 2 January 2020 Reviewer’s comments are italicised, and our responses (R) and revisions (REVISION) are provided in normal fonts. General comments The authors use the results of three different GRACE-based TWS methods and 4 Land surface models to generate an ensemble of groundwater storage anomalies. These are subsequently analyzed by a non-parametric statistical method to separate seasonal signals from non-linear trends and residuals. The main message of the paper is that trends in GWS anomalies (ΔGWS), if existing, are non-linear in the vast majority of main aquifer systems and that rainfall anomalies play an important role in explaining these non-linear trends. I enjoyed reading the paper. I find that it is a well-written with an important message that deserves publication. However, I have a few comments. Moderate comments: 1. I find the lack of reference to estimates based on global hydrological models (GHMS) remarkable. The first spatially distributed global assessment of depletion rates where based on such models and, albeit indirect, should be used in the discussion. They are the basis for the “narratives on global groundwater depletion” that are mentioned in the discussion and the abstract (See https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748- 9326/ab1a5f/meta for an overview of these studies). This is the more remarkable, given that the authors do use Land Surface Models (LSMs) to estimate ΔGWS from GRACE ΔTWS.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater and Global Change: Trends, Opportunities and Challenges
    SIDE PUBLICATIONS SERIES :01 Groundwater and Global Change: Trends, Opportunities and Challenges Jac van der Gun UNITED NATIONS WORLD WATER ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME Published in 2012 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 7, Place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France © UNESCO 2012 All rights reserved ISBN 978-92-3-001049-2 The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. Photographs: Cover: © africa924 / Shutterstock © Rolffimages / Dreamstime © Frontpage / Shutterstock.com p.i: © holgs / iStockphoto p.ii: © Andrew Zarivny p.2: © Aivolie / Shutterstock p.4: © Jorg Hackemann / Shutterstock p.17: © Jac van der Gun p.31: © Aivolie / Shutterstock p.33: © Hilde Vanstraelen Original concept (cover and layout design) of series: MH Design / Maro Haas Layout: Pica Publishing LTD, London–Paris / Roberto Rossi Printed by: UNESCO Printed in France Groundwater and global change: Trends, opportunities and challenges Author: Jac van der Gun Contributors: Luiz Amore (National Water Agency, Brazil), Greg Christelis (Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Forestry, Nambia), Todd Jarvis (Oregon State University, USA), Neno Kukuric (UNESCO-IGRAC) Júlio Thadeu Kettelhut (Ministry of the Environment, Brazil), Alexandros Makarigakis (UNESCO, Ethiopia), Abdullah Abdulkader Noaman (Sana’a University, Yemen), Cheryl van Kempen (UNESCO-IGRAC), Frank van Weert (UNESCO-IGRAC).
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Management Manual
    Procedure Document No. 2617 Document Title Environment Management Manual Area HSE Issue Date 23 August 2017 Major Process Environment Sub Process Management Review Authoriser Jacqui McGill – Asset President Version Number 16 Olympic Dam 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Glossary and defined terms ................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Purpose and scope .............................................................................................................. 3 1.3 How to use the EPMP .......................................................................................................... 4 2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ..................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Key legal requirements ........................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Compliance with routine reporting obligations ..................................................................... 6 2.3 Amendments to the EPMP ................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Environmental outcomes and criteria .................................................................................. 7 2.5 Enforcement process (Indenture and Mining Code) ............................................................ 7 2.6 ALARA and best practicable
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement of Earth Syst
    Supplement of Earth Syst. Dynam., 11, 755–774, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-755-2020-supplement © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Supplement of Groundwater storage dynamics in the world’s large aquifer systems from GRACE: uncertainty and role of extreme precipitation Mohammad Shamsudduha and Richard G. Taylor Correspondence to: Mohammad Shamsudduha ([email protected]) The copyright of individual parts of the supplement might differ from the CC BY 4.0 License. Supplementary Table S1. Characteristics of the world’s 37 large aquifer systems according to the WHYMAP database including aquifer area, total number of population, proportion of groundwater (GW)-fed irrigation, mean aridity index, mean annual rainfall, variability in rainfall and total terrestrial water mass (ΔTWS), and correlation coefficients between monthly ΔTWS and precipitation with reported lags. ) 2 2) Correlation between between Correlation precipitation TWS and (lag in month) GW irrigation (%) (%) GW irrigation on based zones Climate Aridity indices Mean (2002-16) annual precipitation (mm) Rainfall variability (%) (cm TWS variance WHYMAP aquifer number name Aquifer Continent (million)Population area (km Aquifer Nubian Sandstone Hyper- 1 Africa 86.01 2,176,068 1.6 30 12.1 1.5 0.16 (13) Aquifer System arid Northwestern 2 Sahara Aquifer Africa 5.93 1,007,536 4.4 Arid 69 17.3 1.9 0.19 (8) System Murzuk-Djado Hyper- 3 Africa 0.35 483,817 2.3 8 36.6 1.3 0.20 (-8) Basin arid Taoudeni- Hyper- 4 Africa 0.35
    [Show full text]
  • Walking on Water- Global Aquifers
    16 March 2011 Walking on Water Mendel Khoo Researcher FDI Global Food and Water Crises Research Programme Gary Kleyn Manager FDI Global Food and Water Crises Research Programme Summary Aquifers play a key role in the provision of water for farming and for consumption by animals and humans. Almost all parts of the global landmass hide a subterranean water body. Aquifers are underground beds or layers of permeable rock, sediment or soil where water is lodged and can be accessed to yield water. This paper explores some of the major aquifers around the world and determines how countries are coping with increased water usage. Analysis Studying aquifers presents a number of problems, in part because scientists are yet to develop a complete picture of the globe’s aquifer systems; the sub-surface geology still holds mysteries. Further discoveries of aquifers and information on their connectivity with surface water can be expected in the future. The process should be similar to the way in which new discoveries of energy sources beneath the earth’s surface are still being made. An additional impediment lies in the different terms used to describe aquifers, some of them arising simply because of language differences. Aquifers do not fit into one neat category, as there are many variations to their form. The terminology for aquifers can include: underground water basins; groundwater mounds; lakes and parts of rivers; as well as artesian basins, which are confined aquifers contained under positive pressure. Hence, aquifers are not only located underground but some, or all, parts may also be found on the surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting Inter-Aquifer Leakage in Areas with Limited Data Using Hydraulics and Multiple Environmental Tracers, Including 4He, 36Cl/Cl, 14Cand87sr/86Sr
    Hydrogeol J DOI 10.1007/s10040-017-1609-x REPORT Detecting inter-aquifer leakage in areas with limited data using hydraulics and multiple environmental tracers, including 4He, 36Cl/Cl, 14Cand87Sr/86Sr Stacey C. Priestley 1 & Daniel L. Wohling2 & Mark N. Keppel2 & Vincent E. A. Post 1 & Andrew J. Love1 & Paul Shand 1,3 & Lina Tyroller4 & Rolf Kipfer4,5 Received: 6 December 2016 /Accepted: 19 May 2017 # The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract The investigation of regionally extensive ground- controlled by diffuse inter-aquifer leakage, but the coarse spa- water systems in remote areas is hindered by a shortage of data tial resolution means that the presence of additional enhanced due to a sparse observation network, which limits our under- inter-aquifer leakage sites cannot be excluded. This study standing of the hydrogeological processes in arid regions. The makes the case that a multi-tracer approach along with study used a multidisciplinary approach to determine hydrau- groundwater hydraulics and geology provides a tool-set to lic connectivity between the Great Artesian Basin (GAB) and investigate enhanced inter-aquifer leakage even in a ground- the underlying Arckaringa Basin in the desert region of water basin with a paucity of data. A particular problem en- Central Australia. In order to manage the impacts of ground- countered in this study was the ambiguous interpretation of water abstraction from the Arckaringa Basin, it is vital to different age tracers, which is attributed to diffusive transport understand its connectivity with the GAB (upper aquifer), as across flow paths caused by low recharge rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquifer Heat Storage: Abundance and Diversity of the Microbial Community with Acetate at Increased Temperatures
    Originally published as: Westphal, A., Kleyböcker, A., Jesußek, A., Lienen, T., Köber, R., Würdemann, H. (2017): Aquifer heat storage: abundance and diversity of the microbial community with acetate at increased temperatures. ‐ Environmental Earth Sciences, 76. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s12665‐016‐6356‐0 Aquifer heat storage: abundance and diversity of the microbial community with acetate at increased temperatures Anke Westphal1, Anne Kleyböcker1, Anna Jesußek2, Tobias Lienen1, Ralf Köber2, Hilke Würdemann1,3 1 GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Section 5.3 Geomicrobiology, 14473 Potsdam, Germany 2 Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institute of Geosciences, 24118 Kiel, Germany 3 Environmental Technology, Water- and Recycling Technology, Department of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Merseburg University of Applied Sciences, 06217 Merseburg, Germany Abstract The temperature affects the availability of organic carbon and terminal electron acceptors (TEA) as well as the microbial community composition of the subsurface. To investigate the impact of thermal energy storage on the indigenous microbial communities and the fluid geochemistry, lignite aquifer sediments were flowed through with acetate-enriched water at temperatures of 10 °C, 25 °C, 40 °C, and 70 °C in sediment column experiments. Genetic fingerprinting revealed significant differences in the microbial community compositions with respect to the different temperatures. The highest bacterial diversity was found at 70 °C. Carbon and TEA mass balances showed that the aerobic degradation of organic matter (OM) and sulfate reduction were the primary processes that occurred in all the columns, whereas methanogenesis only played a major role at 25 °C. The methanogenic activity corresponded to the highest abundance of an acetoclastic Methanosaeta concilii-like archaeon and the most efficient degradation of acetate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology of Man in the Tropical Environment L'ecologie De L'homme Dans Le Milieu Tropical
    IUCN Publications new series No 4 Ninth technical meeting Neuvième réunion technique NAIROBI, SEPTEMBER 1963 Proceedings and Papers Procès-verbaux et rapports The Ecology of Man in the Tropical Environment L'Ecologie de l'homme dans le milieu tropical Published with the assistance of the Government of Kenya and UNESCO International Union Union Internationale for the Conservation of Nature pour la Conservation de la Nature and Natural Resources et de ses Ressources Morges, Switzerland 1964 IUCN Publications new series No 4 Ninth Technical Meeting held at Nairobi from 17 to 20 September 1963, in conjunction with the Union's Eighth General Assembly Neuvième réunion technique tenue à Nairobi du 17 au 20 septembre 1963 conjointement avec la Huitième Assemblée Générale de l'Union Proceedings and Papers / Procès-verbaux et rapports The Ecology of Man in the Tropical Environment L'Ecologie de l'homme dans le milieu tropical Published with the assistance of the Government of Kenya and UNESCO International Union Union Internationale for the Conservation of Nature pour la Conservation de la Nature and Natural Resources et de ses Ressources Morges, Switzerland 1964 CONTENTS Editorial Note 7 Keynote Address : A. L. ADU 9 Introduction to the technical theme : E. H. GRAHAM 19 PART I : PRE-INDUSTRIAL MAN IN THE TROPICAL ENVIRONMENT Papers of the Technical Meeting. Prehistoric Man in the Tropical Environment : L. S. B. LEAKEY . 24 Aboriginal food-gatherers of Tropical Australia : M. J. MEGGITT . 30 Forest hunters and gatherers : the Mbuti pygmies : C. M. TURNBULL 38 The Fisherman : an overview : H. H. FRESE 44 Pastoralism : B. A. ABEYWICKRAMA 50 Pastoralist : H.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Models and Their Applications to Isotope Studies in Groundwater Hydrology
    IAEA-TECDOC-777 Mathematical models and their applications to isotope studies in groundwater hydrology Proceedings of a final Research Co-ordination Meeting held Vienna,in June1-4 1993 INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY The IAEA does not normally maintain stocks of reports in this series. However, microfiche copies of these reports can be obtained from ClearinghousS I N I e International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramerstrasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria Orders shoul accompaniee db prepaymeny db f Austriao t n Schillings 100, fore for e chequa th f mth IAEf m o n i o n i r eAo microfiche service coupons which may be ordered separately from the INIS Clearinghouse. The originating Section of this document in the IAEA was: Isotope Hydrology Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramerstrasse 5 0 10 P.Ox Bo . A-1400 Vienna, Austria MATHEMATICAL MODEL THEID SAN R APPLICATIONO ST ISOTOPE STUDIE GROUNDWATESN I R HYDROLOGY IAEA, VIENNA, 1994 IAEA-TECDOC-777 ISSN 1011-4289 Printed by the IAEA in Austria December 1994 FOREWORD During the last few decades, the use of tracer techniques in dealing with a variety of hydrological and hydrogeological problems have proved their value in improving the assessment, developmen d managemenan t f wateo t r resources n thiI . s regarde th , methodologies based on observations of temporal and spatial variations of naturally occurring isotopes, often referre 'environmentas a o dt l isotope techniques' widele ar , y employen a s da integra e routinl th par f o te investigations relate o variout d s hydrological systemsd an , particularl regionan yi l ground water aquifers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Guarani Aquifer System
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332702203 The use of isotopes in evolving groundwater circulation models of regional continental aquifers: The case of the Guarani Aquifer System Article in Hydrological Processes · April 2019 DOI: 10.1002/hyp.13476 CITATIONS READS 0 74 4 authors, including: Roberto Kirchheim Didier Gastmans Companhia de Pesquisa de Recursos Minerais São Paulo State University 33 PUBLICATIONS 10 CITATIONS 45 PUBLICATIONS 189 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Hung Kiang Chang São Paulo State University 172 PUBLICATIONS 902 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: AVALIAÇÃO TOXICOLÓGICA DE PRODUTOS EMPREGADOS NO CULTIVO DA CANA-DE-AÇÚCAR SOBRE ORGANISMOS NÃO ALVOS View project Complementary Isotopic Studies in the Southern, Western and Eastern Compartments of the Guarani Aquifer System (Brazil) - Groundwater Dating Along Defined Flow Paths View project All content following this page was uploaded by Roberto Kirchheim on 16 July 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Received: 8 December 2017 Accepted: 5 April 2019 DOI: 10.1002/hyp.13476 SI STABLE ISOTOPES IN HYDROLOGICAL STUDIES The use of isotopes in evolving groundwater circulation models of regional continental aquifers: The case of the Guarani Aquifer System Roberto Eduardo Kirchheim1 | Didier Gastmans2 | Hung Kiang Chang3 | Troy E. Gilmore4 1 Hydrology and Territorial Management Directory (DHT), The Geological Survey of Abstract Brazil (CPRM‐SGB), São Paulo (SP), Brazil The Guarani Aquifer System (GAS) has been studied since the 1970s, a time frame 2 Environmental Studies Center (CEA), São that coincides with the advent of isotopic techniques in Brazil.
    [Show full text]