DOCSLIB.ORG

Neolithic Revolution Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Neolithic Revolution Introduction PREHISTORIC ARCHAEOLOGY Course Name: ANTHROPOLOGY Paper No. & Title: B.A. / B.Sc. 5th Semester (Theory) Topic No. & Title: (13/21) General Features of Neolithic Revolution Introduction The term Neolithic was coined by Sir John Lubbock in 1865 in his book Prehistoric Times to denote an Age in which the stone implements were more varied and skilfully made and often polished. V. Gordon Childe defined the Neolithic-Chalcolithic culture as a self-sufficient food producing economy. M.C. Burkitt further outlined some characteristic features for the Neolithic culture such as the practice of agriculture, domestication of animals in terms of economic life and grinding and polishing of stone tools, and also manufacture of pottery in terms of technology. These concepts have been modified time to time with new research and archaeological evidence found at different sites all over the world. The Neolithic or New Stone Age denotes to a stage of human culture following the Palaeolithic and Mesolithic periods and is characterized by the use of polished stone implements, development of permanent dwellings, cultural advances such as pottery making, domestication of animals and plants, the cultivation of grain and fruit trees, and weaving. The change in the economic mode and life style from hunting/gathering/foraging to primitive farming appeared so abruptly that this overall change in human life is often referred as the “Neolithic Revolution”. Slowly in course of time, the later Neolithic periods with the discovery of smelting and the creation of copper tools have been identified as Chalcolithic period and then, cultures with bronze artefacts have been given the name or coined as Bronze Age. These developed periods with invention of different metals with developed agriculture and farming activities led to the emergence of more complex societies. All of these complex societies emerged in the fertile valleys of different river located in different parts of the globe. Some of these early groups settled in the fertile valleys of the Nile, Tigris-Euphrates, Yellow, and Indus Rivers. These settlements with surplus agricultural product and trade subsequently resulted in the rise of the great civilizations in Egypt, Mesopotamia, China, and India. Some of the early centers where early domestication of plants and animals has been recorded are: (1) In West Asian context, several early Neolithic sites have been identified at Jericho and Ain Ghazal in Jordan, Tepe Guran and Ali Kosh in Iran, Catal Huyuk in Turkey, and Cayonu in north Syria which revealed evidence of early agriculture of wheat and barley and domesticated animals such as sheep and goats. (2) In Southeast Asian context, excavations at the Spirit Cave in Thailand revealed plants remains of almond, pepper, cucumber, betel nut, beans, and peas, however, it is yet to confirm whether all of them were cultivated. (3) In East Asian context, south China has revealed evidence of rice cultivation and the domestication of water buffalo, dog, and pig. (4) In South American context, the people of Mexico were growing corn, beans, squash, gourds, avocados, and chilli pepper, and were domesticating turkeys, dogs, and honeybees. (5) In sub-Saharan African context, the cultivation of finger millet, sorghum, rice, teff, and yams, and the domestication of sheep, goats, and cattle have been recorded. (6) In South Asian context, Mehrgarh has yielded evidence of barley and wheat cultivation, and cattle, sheep, and goat domestication. Recent excavations at the site of Lahuradeva in Uttar Pradesh have brought to light early dates for rice cultivation in India. Comparison between hunter-gatherers and farmers The table below indicates the basic differences between hunter-gatherers and farmers. Hunter-gatherers Farmers Hunting gathering economy, economy Economy based on domesticated based on wild resources crops and animals Mobile (very few possessions of Sedentary (some accumulation of material culture) possessions, esp. pottery, in permanent dwellings) Low population density High population density Overall stability of groups Expansion necessary due to population increase Relatively little impact on Clearance of land for arable farming; environment impact of livestock (use of ground Stone axes and fire in clearance) Sparse archaeological record Archaeological imprint on landscape (campsites, rock shelters, debitage (settlements, boundaries, monuments) scatters) The term ‘Neolithic Revolution’ was introduced by V. Gordon Childe in 1936. The Neolithic revolution led to several changes in human societies which include the creation of cities and permanent dwellings, food storage and granaries, pottery making, labour specialization, sense of personal property, more complex hierarchical social structures, non-agricultural crafts specialisations, trade and barter systems, etc. From being nomads before the onset of agriculture, human adopted the sedentary life style relying on domestications of plants and animals for their survival. Here we shall discuss some of the features of Neolithic Revolution. Domestications of Plants The human evolution in the last 10,000 years BP, which is geologically termed as the Holocene period, witnesses a revolutionary change in the history of human being. During this time, early man acquired slowly the knowledge of taming and bringing several animals and plants under their control, which finally lead to the early domestication process. Domestication simply means ‘to bring plants/animals under human control, to tame’. It is an evolutionary process during which many behavioural traits have changed from the wild types to the existing domesticated populations. The grains of wild varieties of plants like wheat, barley, rice etc. usually fall on the ground before maturation which makes difficulties for harvesting. With the beginning of farming and irrigation, these plants lost many of their wild characters. Yields gradually increased with intense care of the early farmers. The Neolithic farmers selected those varieties which could retain the seeds longer for mature harvesting. Agriculture refers to a series of discoveries involving the domestication, culture, and management of plants and animals. Agriculture was adopted repeatedly and independently in various parts of the world after the retreat of the Pleistocene ice around 12,000 years ago. The precise origin of the first centre of agriculture is unknown. The earliest evidence of agricultural development occurs in the area known as the Fertile Crescent (present day Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Israel). Agriculture also developed in other areas such as China and Meso-America but at a later date. The precise push to develop agriculture is not clear but a number of reasons have been speculated. Different plants were cultivated in different areas by the early Neolithic people, i.e. wheat and barley Southwest Asia, rice in East, South and Southeast Asia, maize in America and sorghum and millet in Africa. Centres of Agricultural Origin: Single or Multiple? The hunter-gatherers of the Near East (Fertile Crescent) were probably the first to adopt an agricultural lifestyle around 8500 B.C., based upon the cereals barley and wheat and on domesticated goats and sheep. They were followed by the maize-cultivators of Central Mexico around 8000 B.C. and the rice producers along the Yangtze River around 7500 B.C. Recent genetic research has indicated that multiple domestications of the same wild plants and animals probably have occurred more often than previously believed. For instance, it has been shown that apart from in the Near East, the goat was independently domesticated in the Indus Valley whereas cattle were domesticated both in the Near East and in East Asia. In Europe, agricultural practices were adopted only after the spread of domesticated plants and animals from the Near East. Map of the world showing approximate centers of origin of agriculture and its spread in prehistory, i.e. eastern USA (4000–3000 BP), Central Mexico (5000–4000 BP), Northern South America (5000–4000 BP), sub-Saharan Africa (5000–4000 BP, exact location unknown), the Fertile Crescent (11000 BP), the Yangtze and Yellow River basins (9000 BP) and the New Guinea Highlands (9000–6000 BP). In a review published in the journal Science on the expansions of the farmers to different parts of the world, Jared Diamond and Peter Bellwood show intimate connections of agricultural origins with language spread and dispersals. They discussed the possible dispersal routes of Neolithic/formative cultures worldwide. According to them, until the end of the Pleistocene, all people on all continents lived as hunter-gatherers and subsequently at different times between about 8500 and 2500 B.C., food production based on domestication of relatively few wild plants and animal species arose independently in different homelands of agriculture and herding, scattered over all inhabited continents except Australia. As food production was advantages to farmers compared with hunter-gatherers living outside those homelands, it triggered outward dispersals of farming populations, bearing their languages and lifestyles. Plate 1: Archaeological map of agricultural origin and spread of Neolithic cultures around the world Causes of Domestications of Plants Several hypotheses are made for explaining the causes of domestications of plants which is the basis of Neolithic Revolution. V Gordon Childe in 1952 suggested that environmental changes at the end of the Pleistocene were the impetus towards food production and argued
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Megalith.Pdf
    PUBLICATIONS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER ETHNOLOGICAL SERIES No. Ill THE MEGALITHIC CULTURE OF INDONESIA Published by the University of Manchester at THE UNIVERSITY PRESS (H. M. MCKECHNIE, Secretary) 12 LIME GROVE, OXFORD ROAD, MANCHESTER LONGMANS, GREEN & CO. LONDON : 39 Paternoster Row : . NEW YORK 443-449 Fourth Avenue and Thirtieth Street CHICAGO : Prairie Avenue and Twenty-fifth Street BOMBAY : Hornby Road CALCUTTA: G Old Court House Street MADRAS: 167 Mount Road THE MEGALITHIC CULTURE OF INDONESIA BY , W. J. PERRY, B.A. MANCHESTEE : AT THE UNIVERSITY PBESS 12 LIME GROVE, OXFOBD ROAD LONGMANS, GREEN & CO. London, New York, Bombay, etc. 1918 PUBLICATIONS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER No. CXVIII All rights reserved TO W. H. R. RIVERS A TOKEN OF AFFECTION AND REGARD PREFACE. IN 1911 the stream of ethnological research was directed by Dr. Rivers into new channels. In his Presidential Address to the Anthropological Section of the British Association at Portsmouth he expounded some of the effects of the contact of diverse cul- tures in Oceania in producing new, and modifying pre-existent institutions, and thereby opened up novel and hitherto unknown fields of research, and brought into prominence once again those investigations into movements of culture which had so long been neglected. A student who wishes to study problems of culture mixture and transmission is faced with a variety of choice of themes and of regions to investigate. He can set out to examine topics of greater or less scope in circumscribed areas, or he can under- take world-wide investigations which embrace peoples of all ages and civilisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ritual Landscapes and Borders Within Rock Art Research Stebergløkken, Berge, Lindgaard and Vangen Stuedal (Eds)
    Stebergløkken, Berge, Lindgaard and Vangen Stuedal (eds) and Vangen Lindgaard Berge, Stebergløkken, Art Research within Rock and Borders Ritual Landscapes Ritual Landscapes and Ritual landscapes and borders are recurring themes running through Professor Kalle Sognnes' Borders within long research career. This anthology contains 13 articles written by colleagues from his broad network in appreciation of his many contributions to the field of rock art research. The contributions discuss many different kinds of borders: those between landscapes, cultures, Rock Art Research traditions, settlements, power relations, symbolism, research traditions, theory and methods. We are grateful to the Department of Historical studies, NTNU; the Faculty of Humanities; NTNU, Papers in Honour of The Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences and Letters and The Norwegian Archaeological Society (Norsk arkeologisk selskap) for funding this volume that will add new knowledge to the field and Professor Kalle Sognnes will be of importance to researchers and students of rock art in Scandinavia and abroad. edited by Heidrun Stebergløkken, Ragnhild Berge, Eva Lindgaard and Helle Vangen Stuedal Archaeopress Archaeology www.archaeopress.com Steberglokken cover.indd 1 03/09/2015 17:30:19 Ritual Landscapes and Borders within Rock Art Research Papers in Honour of Professor Kalle Sognnes edited by Heidrun Stebergløkken, Ragnhild Berge, Eva Lindgaard and Helle Vangen Stuedal Archaeopress Archaeology Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Gordon House 276 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7ED www.archaeopress.com ISBN 9781784911584 ISBN 978 1 78491 159 1 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress and the individual authors 2015 Cover image: Crossing borders. Leirfall in Stjørdal, central Norway. Photo: Helle Vangen Stuedal All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Bamboo House Building Manual
    Manual on Building Bamboo Houses This manual on how to build a bamboo house comes as a result of research conducted at the Engineering Structures Research Centre at City University by a team of development engineers funded by Pell Frischmann Consulting Engineers. The purpose of their research is to help communities where this kind of information is not accessible and yet the most valuable. The aim of the information provided here is to share knowledge on how to construct low-rise housing that is resistant to earthquakes, particularly in developing countries. The design plans produced by this team require only basic construction skills and tools. The materials are sustainable, durable, and can often be locally obtained. The development team is headed by Professor Kuldeep S. Virdi of City University, London, and Mr. Rossen D. Rashkoff. We appreciate their efforts and commitment to making safe and sustainable housing more accessible. Building materials 1. Introduction The construction materials for building a bamboo house should be readily available and accessible. Traditionally used construction materials are considered. The bamboo based house has a very low weight therefore foundations can be minimised. For wall construction are used wall panels, assembled from split bamboo grids and chicken steel mesh and plastered with cement mortar. Basic materials for house components (bamboo, wire, bolts, chicken mesh, and cement) are inexpensive. Bamboo can tolerate high values of deformations in the elastic range i.e. possesses high elasticity. Therefore bamboo houses when properly constructed are ductile i.e. being able to sway back and forth during an earthquake, without any damage to the bamboo poles.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch. 4. NEOLITHIC PERIOD in JORDAN 25 4.1
    Borsa di studio finanziata da: Ministero degli Affari Esteri di Italia Thanks all …………. I will be glad to give my theses with all my love to my father and mother, all my brothers for their helps since I came to Italy until I got this degree. I am glad because I am one of Dr. Ursula Thun Hohenstein students. I would like to thanks her to her help and support during my research. I would like to thanks Dr.. Maysoon AlNahar and the Museum of the University of Jordan stuff for their help during my work in Jordan. I would like to thank all of Prof. Perreto Carlo and Prof. Benedetto Sala, Dr. Arzarello Marta and all my professors in the University of Ferrara for their support and help during my Phd Research. During my study in Italy I met a lot of friends and specially my colleges in the University of Ferrara. I would like to thanks all for their help and support during these years. Finally I would like to thanks the Minister of Fournier of Italy, Embassy of Italy in Jordan and the University of Ferrara institute for higher studies (IUSS) to fund my PhD research. CONTENTS Ch. 1. INTRODUCTION 1 Ch. 2. AIMS OF THE RESEARCH 3 Ch. 3. NEOLITHIC PERIOD IN NEAR EAST 5 3.1. Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA) in Near east 5 3.2. Pre-pottery Neolithic B (PPNB) in Near east 10 3.2.A. Early PPNB 10 3.2.B. Middle PPNB 13 3.2.C. Late PPNB 15 3.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Adobe Mudbrick in Application – Child-Care Centre Construction in El Salvador
    13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 2004 Paper No. 705 IMPROVED ADOBE MUDBRICK IN APPLICATION – CHILD-CARE CENTRE CONSTRUCTION IN EL SALVADOR Dominic DOWLING1 SUMMARY Major earthquakes in Latin America, Asia and The Middle East have served as recent reminders of the vulnerability of traditional adobe (mudbrick) dwellings to the force of earthquakes. A host of research, training and construction projects continue to address this precarious situation and there have been various publications describing the developments in improved adobe (mudbrick) design and construction in recent years. These publications have mostly originated from research institutions and have tended to focus on the technical and experimental details of a variety of improvement systems. The dissemination of this important information is a vital component in the challenge to promote and build safer homes. Furthermore, these advances in technical detail must be accompanied by practical information, which relates to the actual application of the proposed systems, addressing the advantages and disadvantages of each technique. This paper attempts to address the current deficiency of this practical information, and thus provide adobe constructors and proponents with a realistic understanding of some of the practical issues related to improved adobe construction. This paper describes the technical and practical aspects and ‘lessons learned’ from a recent improved adobe construction project in El Salvador, as well as drawing on field investigations, laboratory research and other literature. The paper concludes with a proposed addition to the current technical evaluation of the performance of improvement systems: the assessment of the skill level and resources required to effectively incorporate improved adobe systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology, History, and Architectural History in Maine
    (CR) General Information – Archaeology, History, and Architectural History in Maine MAINE PREHISTORIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES: INTRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT By Arthur Spiess Maine Historic Preservation Commission (1999) INTRODUCTION Before the arrival of Europeans, Maine’s Native Americans left no written records, indeed few lasting records except for archaeological sites. The first historic record of them was written by European explorers in the 16th century, so we refer to the archaeology of Maine’s Native American inhabitants as “prehistoric” archaeology. The methods of prehistoric archaeologists differ from those of historians. Rather than studying written documents primarily, archaeologists study the material remains of extinct cultures. Archaeological sites were usually not created with the intent of communicating anything to future generations, so we must leave some of the most basic questions about prehistoric people unanswered. For example, we shall never know their names for themselves, or the details of their religious beliefs. We can infer some things about their lives from anthropological accounts of similar cultures elsewhere in the world, or from reading the earliest historic documents from Maine. Mostly we are reliant on the archaeological record, which can be shockingly honest and unmistakable, or frustratingly obscure. To understand Maine’s prehistoric archaeological sites, the threats to them, and the means for their protection, the following paragraphs provide an introduction to Maine prehistory and archaeological site location. The first Native Americans to live in Maine moved in from the south or west about 11,000 years ago as the land recovered from its last glaciation, and as tundra and open spruce woodland vegetation cover grew enough to support the large and small game they hunted (including mastodon and caribou).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Nature of Transitions: the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution
    On the Nature of Transitions: the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Bar-Yosef, Ofer. 1998. “On the Nature of Transitions: The Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution.” Cam. Arch. Jnl 8 (02) (October): 141. Published Version doi:10.1017/S0959774300000986 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12211496 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Cambridge Archaeological Journal 8:2 (1998), 141-63 On the Nature of Transitions: the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution Ofer Bar-Yosef This article discusses two major revolutions in the history of humankind, namely, the Neolithic and the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic revolutions. The course of the first one is used as a general analogy to study the second, and the older one. This approach puts aside the issue of biological differences among the human fossils, and concentrates solely on the cultural and technological innovations. It also demonstrates that issues that are common- place to the study of the trajisition from foraging to cultivation and animal husbandry can be employed as an overarching model for the study of the transition from the Middle to the Upper Palaeolithic. The advantage of this approach is that it focuses on the core areas where each of these revolutions began, the ensuing dispersals and their geographic contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Stones, Bones, and States: a New Approach to the Neolithic Revolution
    1 Stones, Bones, and States: A New Approach to the Neolithic Revolution Richard H. Steckel and John Wallis February 19, 2007 The invention of agriculture, the wide spread shift to a sedentary lifestyle, and the growth of large population centers began around 10,000 years ago in what we now call the Neolithic revolution. This profound change in human activity marks the beginning of modern human society and has long been of interest to economists, anthropologists, and social scientists in general. Was it caused by a shift in relative prices due to climate, population pressure, or changes in the animal environment? Did it result from technological innovation in human knowledge about the physical world? Was institutional change a catalyst? Early research was highly speculative, with abundant explanations built on little data. New evidence from archeology and anthropology has eliminated some hypotheses and raised possibilities for answering more specific questions. This paper contributes to both the Neolithic empirical evidence and the theoretical questions about the Neolithic revolution. We propose a theoretical answer to how larger social groups were organized. A sedentary life-style was necessary for settled agriculture, and the shift to larger population units occurred contemporaneously with, and may have even preceded, the spread of new agricultural techniques. We then focus on the paradoxes inherent in the question: why did people move into towns and cities? Urban living came at a substantial cost. Accumulating evidence from skeletons, which we discuss below, shows that Neolithic cities and towns were unhealthy. Their residents were smaller in stature than hunter-gatherers and their bones had relatively more lesions indicating dental decay, infections and other signs of physiological stress.
    [Show full text]
  • A Lesson in Stone: Examining Patterns of Lithic Resource Use and Craft-Learning in the Minas Basin Region of Nova Scotia By
    A Lesson in Stone: Examining Patterns of Lithic Resource Use and Craft-learning in the Minas Basin Region of Nova Scotia By © Catherine L. Jalbert A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies for partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Department of Archaeology Memorial University of Newfoundland May 2011 St. John’s Newfoundland Abstract Examining the Late Woodland (1500-450 BP) quarry/workshop site of Davidson Cove, located in the Minas Basin region of Nova Scotia, a sample of debitage and a collection of stone implements appear to provide correlates of the novice and raw material production practices. Many researchers have hypothesized that lithic materials discovered at multiple sites within the region originated from the outcrop at Davidson Cove, however little information is available on lithic sourcing of the Minas Basin cherts. Considering the lack of archaeological knowledge concerning lithic procurement and production, patterns of resource use among the prehistoric indigenous populations in this region of Nova Scotia are established through the analysis of existing collections. By analysing the lithic materials quarried and initially reduced at the quarry/workshop with other contemporaneous assemblages from the region, an interpretation of craft-learning can be situated in the overall technological organization and subsistence strategy for the study area. ii Acknowledgements It is a pleasure to thank all those who made this thesis achievable. First and foremost, this thesis would not have been possible without the guidance and support provided by my supervisor, Dr. Michael Deal. His insight throughout the entire thesis process was invaluable. I would also like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology 1
    Anthropology 1 ANTHROPOLOGY [email protected] Hillary DelPrete, Assistant Professor (Graduate Faculty). B.S., Tulane Chair: Christopher DeRosa, Department of History and Anthropology University; M.A., Ph.D., Rutgers University. Professor DelPrete is a biological anthropologist with a specialization in modern evolution. The Anthropology curriculum is designed to provide a liberal arts Teaching and research interests include human evolution, human education that emphasizes the scientific study of humanity. Three areas variation, human behavioral ecology, and anthropometrics. of Anthropology are covered: [email protected] • Cultural Anthropology, the comparative study of human beliefs and Christopher DeRosa, Associate Professor and Chair (Graduate Faculty). behavior with special attention to non-Western societies; B.A., Columbia University; Ph.D., Temple University. Fields include • Archaeology, the study of the human cultural heritage from its military history and American political history. Recent research prehistoric beginnings to the recent past; and concerns the political indoctrination of American soldiers. • Biological Anthropology, the study of racial variation and the physical [email protected] and behavioral evolution of the human species. Adam Heinrich, Assistant Professor (Graduate Faculty). B.S., M.A., The goal of the Anthropology program is to provide students with a broad Ph.D., Rutgers University. Historical and prehistoric archaeology; understanding of humanity that will be relevant to their professions, their
    [Show full text]
  • Irrigation: Types, Sources and Problems in Malaysia
    17 Irrigation: Types, Sources and Problems in Malaysia M. E. Toriman1 and M. Mokhtar2 1School of Social, Development & Environmental Studies FSSK. National University of Malaysia Bangi Selangor 2Institute of Environment & Development (LESTARI) National University of Malaysia Bangi Selangor Malaysia 1. Introduction Irrigation is always synonym with agriculture. From ancient to modern era, irrigation has been around for as long as humans have been cultivating plants. Archaeological investigations were proved that from ancient Egyptians until the middle of 20th century, irrigation technology are gradually improved in conjunction with advancement in water technology, water transfer and agriculture systems. In simple terminology, irrigation can be defined as the replacement or supplementation of rainwater with another source of water. It is a science of artificial application of water to the land or soil. The main idea behind irrigation systems is that the lawns and plants are maintained with the minimum amount of water required. Irrigation has been used for many purposes, among them are for maintenance of landscapes and revegetation of disturbed soils in dry areas and during periods of inadequate rainfall. However when relates to agriculture, irrigation is one of a major section to assist in the growing of agricultural crops. Additionally, irrigation also protecting plants against frost, suppressing weed growing in grain fields and helping in preventing soil consolidation. The implementation of an irrigation system will help conserve water, while saving time, money, preventing weed growth and increasing the growth rate of your lawns, plants and crops. This article discusses on the irrigation in Malaysia- which is one of a major water regulation technology which helps to improved to about 14300 farmers in Malaysia.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Approaches to the Analysis and Interpretation of Small Lithic Sites in the Northeast the UNIVERSITY of the STATE of NEW YORK
    Current Approaches to the Analysis and Interpretation of Small Lithic Sites in the Northeast THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Regents of The University ROBERT M. BENNETT, Chancellor, B.A., M.S. Tonawanda MERRYL H. TISCH, Vice Chancellor, B.A., M.A. Ed.D. New York SAUL B. COHEN, B.A., M.A., Ph.D. New Rochelle JAMES C. DAWSON, A.A., B.A., M.S., Ph.D. Peru ANTHONY S. BOTTAR, B.A., J.D. Syracuse GERALDINE D. CHAPEY, B.A., M.A., Ed.D. Belle Harbor ARNOLD B. GARDNER, B.A., LL.B. Buffalo HARRY PHILLIPS, 3rd, B.A., M.S.F.S. Hartsdale JOSEPH E. BOWMAN,JR., B.A., M.L.S., M.A., M.Ed., Ed.D. Albany JAMES R. TALLON,JR., B.A., M.A. Binghamton MILTON L. COFIELD, B.S., M.B.A., Ph.D. Rochester ROGER B. TILLES, B.A., J.D. Great Neck KAREN BROOKS HOPKINS, B.A., M.F.A. Brooklyn NATALIE M. GOMEZ-VELEZ, B.A., J.D. Bronx CHARLES R. BENDIT,B.A. ............................................................................ NewYork President of The University and Commissioner of Education RICHARD P. MILLS Deputy Commissioner for Cultural Education JEFFREY W. CANNELL Director of the New York State Museum CLIFFORD A. SIEGFRIED Director, Research and Collections Division JOHN P. HART The State Education Department does not discriminate on the basis of age, color, religion, creed, disability, marital status, veteran status, national ori- gin, race, gender, genetic predisposition or carrier status, or sexual orientation in its educational programs, services and activities. Portions of this pub- lication can be made available in a variety of formats, including braille, large print or audio tape, upon request.
    [Show full text]