<<

114 SouthAfrican Journal of Science98, March/April2002 Gommentary

reveals slight heterochromatin differ- lnducing sex change and ences,"'" which is itself due to differential methylation."''n Therefore, it is distinctly organogenesis from tissue possible that methylation controls sex determination. culture in the endangered African Methylation and accompanying hetero- chromatin can be removed by various woodii f actors - such as temper attJte,'5''6 lighft ,27 osmotic stress,28or hormones2e-31- result- (Gycadales, Zamiaceael ing in sex change.3''33Sex change occurs only in organisms that have (virtually) indistinguishable sex chromosomes, indi- Root Gorelicku" and Roy Osborneb cating that incipient sex chromosomes are formed by slight differences in methylation. Differential methylation is I F INCIPIENT SEX CHROMOSOME DIFFEREN- Fourth, if backcrossing is the only realistic evolutionarily the first difference between I tiutiott is caused by differential methy- approach to conservation, then it is pref- females and males3nand is the likely cause I lation between females and males, then erableto use E.woodiiasthe female parent of reported sex changes in . methylating or demethylating cytosine because of maternal inheritance of nucleotides may induce sex change. chloroplast genomes. Fifth, induced sex Methylation may also stimulate regeneration Application of theory to sex change of roots and shoots from tissue culture callus change may assist in the conservation of in cycads and increase genetic variation via greater other dioecious . Sixth, sex change Although sex-specific differential mutation. We propose using these methods provides fundamental insight into the methylation or heterochromatin has not for conserving , for biology of sex determination. We propose been examined in cycads, lack of identifi- which only a single male clone exists, sex a method for inducing sex change in able sex chromosomesr and occasional change has neverbeen induced" and regenera- cycads and regeneration of roots and induction of sex change via environmen- tion from callus tissue has not been accom- shoots from callus, including discussion plished. tal shocks35suggest that sex determina- of the pitfalls. tion in cycads is due to differential Definitive for The of the African methylation. evidence Theory of sex demethylation cycad Encephalartos woodii Sander is bleak. determination differential determining This article is predicated on the hypoth- sex should be sought in cycads, especially All extant plants are derived from a single in individuals male clone.' Although vegetative propa- esisthat, inboth females and males, incip- in populations which some gation is readily accomplished from off- ient sex chromosomes arose as a different have undergone sex changes, using tech- sets and more recently from cuttings, methylation pattern on one of two niques such as chromomycin staining," genetic diversity is zero. homologous autosomes and the altered high-performance liquid chromatogra- Osborne' proposed two conservation methylation was of regulatory genetic phy (HPL C),uu't'or bisulphide sequencing strategies for E. woodii: (1) repeated back- elements that control sex hormone pro- of promoters of genes that regulate crossing of the existing male with females duction. Sexual differentiation in plants is hormone levels."tt of a closely related ,and (2) chemi- regulated by sex hormones.s Cytosine nu- We propose applying demethylating cally or environmentally inducing sex cleotides are methylated via replacement compounds to cycad cells in tissue change in tissue-cultured plantlets from of the hydrogen at the C-5 position by a culture, an approach that has resulted in the existing male. The first approach methyl group and are highly heritable.oz sex change in at least one angiosperm resulted in an F1 generation of Methylation causes sex by blocking bind- species.T S-azacytidine, and S-aza- -deoxycytidine Encephalartosnatalensis x E. woodii in the ing sites for enzymes that mediate tran- 2' demethylate CpG 1980s and recently F, seedlings of (E. scription of sex hormones.&tt dinucleotides in most eukaryotes,42-+6 natalensis x E. woodii) x E. woodii (pers. Methylation suppressestranscription in while L-ethionine and dihydroxy- obs.). We focus on sex change because it is several ways. Heterochromatic proteins propyladenine demethylate cytosines in the least well understood of the two bind to methylated cytosines, occupying CpNpG trinucleotides of plants (N can be approaches and has potentially the protein binding sites.t2'13Methylation any nucleotide base).nt greater conservation benefits. alters interactions of histones with Although demethylating agents have There are potentially six benefits to promoter regions by stimulating histone not been used to alter the sex of cycads, inducing sex change in Encephalartos deacetylation.la-16Bound heterochro- we propose that altering methylation of zaoodii.First, our proposed method of sex matic proteins and histones are called tissue-cultured cells of Encephalartos change promotes mutation, thereby heterochromatin. Transcription is also ruoodii could yield female plants. We increasing genetic variation. Second, suppressed because methyl groups are suggest trying this procedure first on rela- there would be increased epigenetic vari- bulky and hydrophobic, thereby chang- tively common species of Encephalartos, ation due to meiotic recombination.3 ing DNA conformation and blocking such as E. natalensis.Tissue-cultured Third, female plants produce mega- binding sites,17sometimes converting the angiosperms have survived exposure to gametophytes and zygotes providing the normally right-handed DNA helix to S-azacytidine, although with lower viabil- cells of choice for cycad tissue culture.n left-handed.18'1e ity and higher mutation rates.nn'n8 aDepartment Dioecious seed plants generally have Measuring methylation levels using of Biology,Arizona State University,Tempe, 4285287-1501, U.S.A. putative sex chromosomes that are indis- HPLC or bisulphide sequencing before bP.O. Box244, Burpengary,Queensland 4505, Australia. tinguishable under a light microscope.2O and after application of demethylating -Author for corresoondence.E-mail: [email protected] Close inspection, howevel sometimes compounds would provide a means for Gommentary SouthAfrican Journal of Science98, March/April2002

determining appropriate amounts of (reviewed in ref. 54). Tissue culture of tion of downstream regions of genes may these chemicals to use in subsequent stem, root, and leaf material from several also affect regulation.ut Our best hope is experiments. The quantity of demethyl- species of Encephalartoshas given rise to for selective methylation and demethyla- ating compounds could be adjusted so callus.tn'tt Cell cultures from zygotes of tion o1, less elegantly, for many random that the resulting diminution of methyl- two species of Encephalarloshave been attempts in the hope that one explant will ation matches that found in cycads of the partially successful: shoots were formed, be successfully regenerated. requisite sex, although we recognize that roots were not, and no plants matured.56 The proposed applications of methyla- 'wrong' the methyl groups might get Recent work using tissue from mega- ting and demethylating agents serve a stripped away.nt gametophytes and zygotes of the Mexi- dual purpose: sex change and regenera- If sex determination in Encephnlartos can cycads Ceratozamiahildae,C. mexicana, tion of roots and shoots. The optimal znoodii is controlled by differential fischeri, Z. t'urfuracea, Z. pumila and amounts of these chemicals may, how- methylation, then there is an a priori 50% particularly edule,has been encour- eve(, be different for each function. The chance that a male-to-female change can aging, producing plants that can be targeted loci for methylation may also be be induced via demethylation. The odds grown in soil.a'57'58Tissue culture of different. may be loweq, howeveq, because nearly all megagametophyte and zygote explants sex changes reported in Encephalartos probably leads to more successful regen- Problems following sex change and have been from female-to-male (re- eration of entire plants because global regeneration viewed in ref. 35). If females of E. woodii demethylation and de noao methyla- Even if male-to-female sex change can have more heavily methylated promoters tion may be a prerequisite for proper be induced and viable sexual offspring of sex determining genes than males, sex development, as with most eukaryote formed in E. woodii, there will still be change of the extant male clone can be embryos.5e-6iAn important but as yet no genetic variability in the species. attempted via methylation. Addition of unattained objective is to take leaf, stem, There will be only epigenetic varia- methyl groups to cytosine nucleotides or root explants of Encephalartos and tion due to different methylation pat- may be possible by treating tissue cultures induce shoot and root formation from terns. It is noteworthy that F, and F, back- with S-methyl deoxcytidine. This calli. This is necessary tor E. woodii, in crosses of E. natalensis x E. woodii have approach has been attempted with which neither megagametophytes nor been raised. mammalian cells, where the dose of zy gotespresently exist. Another incentive Methylation-induced mutations, S-methyl deoxcytidine was adjusted so for inducing sex change of the extant male although often deleterious, could be of that half the cell line survived.4e-s1How- E. woodii clone is that megagametophytic conservation benefit for E. woodii because eve4 much less experimental work has and zygotic cells can then be obtained, the surviving mutants increase genetic been done with methylation than with cultured, and treated with demethylating variability of the population.u' Methy- demethylation. or methylating agents. lation creates a tension between in- Ideally, the specific nucleotides respon- Although regeneration of tissue cul- creased genetic variation and decreased sible for regulation of sex hormones and tured E. woodii has not yet been accom- viability.66'67The balance between these sex should be identified, an assessment plished, our theoretical framework of sex two will determine the conservation im- made of whether their regulation is con- determination via methylation may plications of the proposed methylation/ trolled by methylation, and then only provide the method by which differentia- demethylation induced sex change of E. those specific nucleotides should be selec- tion of callus tissue can be induced.6' woodii. The best possible outcome is that tively methylated and/or demethylated Ontogenetic regulation of all and viable sex-changed females will emerge in an attempt to change sex and regener- animal tissues is largely controlled by from this protocol carrying a large num- ate roots and shoots from callus. Selective demethylation, although many of the ber of mutations. It is not necessary that methylation can be attempted using methylated genes controlling regulation all these mutations appear on a single methylated single-stranded oligonucleo- have not yet been identified. Until noW female; the genetic variation of the entire tides,52'53a technique that is not yet fully regeneration of tissue-cultured roots population is critical. A successful proto- developed. Until then, attempts should and shoots relied on the application of col for tissue culture of E. ruoodii wlll be made by randomly methylating and plant hormones, which work largely produce many sex-changedmutants tobe demethylating the genome, although by demethylating chromosomal cyto- grown into explants with (collectively) as most such attempts are likely to be unsuc- sines."'3t'63Until we know which genes to much genetic variation as possible, cessful. demethylate and how to demethylate thereby reducing the probability of them selectively, we propose skipping the extinction. Regeneration of roots and shoots intermediary of plant hormones and in- Cycads have maternally inherited from tissue culture callus stead applying S-azacytidine to E. woodii chloroplasts6s (and mitochondria?). The Even if the sex of E. woodii can be callus to induce root and shoot regenera- main disadvantage of backcrossing the changed with demethylating or methyla- tion.6a We also suggest first applying existing male E. woodii with females of ting chemicals, other problems need to be S-methyl deoxcytidine to the callus to other Encephalarfosspecies is that these addressedbefore any protocol canbe con- simulate early embryonic de noao non-Mendelian organelle genomes from sidered effective, such as growing sex- methylation. the male parent are irrevocably lost from changed tissue cultures up to full-sized As with sex change, we expect that all backcrosses.utA preferred option cone-bearing plants, difficulties relating regeneration from callus will usually be would be to backcross an induced female to small effective population size, and unsuccessful because of the randomness E. woodii with males of a closely related evolutionary loss of organelle genomes. of methylation and demethylation when species so that the E. woodii organelle Early attempts to propagate cycads applying compounds like S-azacytidine. genomes are preserved, providing addi- from tissue culture, including Encepha- Although regulation is largely controlled tional impetus for inducing sex change in lartos species, met with limited success by methylation of promoters, methyla- E. woodii. 116 SouthAfrican Journal ol Science98, March/April2O02 Gommentary

1., Lorenz A. and Vyskot B. Conclusion SinauerAssociates, Sunderland, MA. 22. Greilhuber ]., Ebert Chavez VM. and Litz R.E. (1999). Organogenesis (2000). Origin of facultative heterochromatin in If sex is determined by methylation, from megagametophyte and zygotic embryo the endosperm of Gagea lutea (Lilliaceae). then attempts should be made to induce explants of the Dioon edule Lindley Pr ot oplasma2L2, 217-226. sex change of tissue-cultured cycad cells (, Cycadales). Plnnt CeII Tissue Organ 23. Scarbrough K., Hattman S. and Nur U. (1984). CuLt.58,219-222. Relationship of DNA methylation level to the specific demethylating or methyl- using Grant S.R. (\999). Genetics of gender dimorphism presence of heterochromatin in mealybugs. Mol. ating agents. A prerequisite is to verify in higher plants. In Genderand SexualDimorphism Cell. Biol. 4,599-603. whether differential methylation of in Flowering Plants, eds M.A. Geber, TE. Dawson 24. Singer T, Yordan C. and Martienssen R. (2001). Robertson's Mutator transposons in A. thaliana specific genes, primarily those producing and L.F. Delph, pp. 246-274. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. are regulated by the chromatin-remodeling gene and regulating hormones, is correlated 6. Holliday R. (1988). A possible role for meiotic Decreasein DNA methylation (DDML). GenesDea. with sex in cycads. It is desirable also to recombination in germ line reprogramming and 15,591.-602. quantify degree of methylation in cycad maintenance.InThe Eaolution of Sex:An Exsmina- 25. Dorazi R., Chesnel A. and Dournan C. (1995). tion of Current ldeas, eds R.E. Michod and B.R. Opposite sex determination of gonads in two clones for which sex change has been Levin, pp. 45-55. Sinauer Associates,Sunderland, Pleurodeles species may be due to tempera- reported. Of, better yet, to identify which MA. ture-dependent inactivation of sex-chromo- nucleotide loci contain regulation-con- 7. Vyskot B., Koukalov6 B., Kovarik A., Sachambul somes. I. Hered. 86,28-31.. L., Reynolds D. and Bezdek M. (1995). Meiotic 26. Demeulemeester M.A.C., Van Stallen N. and De trolling methylation. transmission of a hypomethylated repetitive Proft M.P (7999). Degree of DNA methylation in Establishment of a successful protocol DNA family in tobacco. Theor. Appl. Genet. 9L, chicory (Cichorium intybus L.): influence of plant for inrsitro culture of diploid vegetative or 659-664. age and vernalization . Plant Sci.L42,701-108. D. (1978). 27. Tatra G.S., Miranda Chinnappa C.C. and Reid embryonic tissue of Encephalartos,particu- 8. Charlesworth B. and Charlesworth J., Model for evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. D.M. (2000). Effect of light quality and S-azacyti- larly E. woodii, including organogenesis Am. Nat.112,975-997. dine on genomic methylation and stem elonga- and the ultimate re-establishment of 9. Griswold M.D. and Kim J-S. (2001). Site-specific tion in two ecotypes of Stellaria longipes.Physiol. plantlets in soil, remains a sine qua non for methylation of the promoter alters deoxyribonu- Plant. L09,313-321. cleic acid-protein interactions and prevents folli- 28. Kovarik A., KoukalovA 8., Bezdek M. and for- this project. As with sex change, the cle-stimulating hormone receptor gene Opatrny Z. (1997). Hypermethylation of tobacco mation of roots and shoots may also be transcription . BioL Reprod. 64, 602-610. heterochromatic loci in response to osmotic stress. possible by applying methylating and 10. Iannello R.C., Young J., Sumarsono S., Tymms Theor.Appl. Genet.95, 301-306. M.J., Dahl H.H.M. et aL (7997). Regulation of 29. LoSchiavo F., Pitto L., Giuliano G., Torti G., demethylating agents to the callus tissue. Pdha-2 expression is mediated by proximal Nuti-Ronchi Y. et aL (1989). DNA methylation of This seems especially plausible because promoter sequences and CpG methylation. Mol. embryogenic carrot cell cultures and its variation plant hormones are known to cause the CeIl. BioI. 17, 612-619. as caused by mutation, differentiation, hormones 11. Iannello R.C., Gould J.A., Young J.C., Giudice A., and hypomethylating drugs. Theor. AppI. Genet. following: (i) heritable changes in '/ Medcalf R. and Kola I. (2000). Methylation-de- /. JZj-JJr. (ii) sexual differen- methylation patterns, pendent silencing of the testis-specific Pdha-Z 30. Jost J.P and Saluz H.P (1993). Steroid hormone tiation in plants, and (iii) regeneration of basal promoter occurs through selective targeting dependent changes in DNA methylation and its roots and shoots from callus. of an activating transcription factor/cAMP-re- significance for the activation or silencing of spe- sponsive element-binding site. l. BioI. Chem.275, cific genes. In DNA Methylation: Molecular Biology If sex change is successful with 19603-19608. and Biological Signit'icance,eds ].P Jost and H.P Encephalartoswoodii and the resulting 12. Iguchi-Ariga S.M.M. and Schaffner W (1989).CpG Saluz, pp. 425451. Birkhiiuser Verlag, Basel. female plants are sexually viable, then methylation of the cAMP-responsive enhancer/ 31. Arnholdt-Schmitt B.,Holzapfel B., Schillinger A. promoter sequence TGACGTCA abolishes spe- and Neumann K-H. (1991). Variable methylation economics will certainly lead to cific factor binding as well as transcriptional acti- and differential replication of genomic DNA in programmes for breeding nascent female vation. GenesDea. 3, 672-619. cultured carrot root explants during growth clones to the extant male clone. Back- 13. Tate PH. and Bird A.P (1993). Effects of DNA on induction as influenced by hormonal treatments. crossing the female clones to males of DNA-binding proteins and gene expre ssion. Curr. Theor.Appl. Genet. 82, 283-288. Opin Genet.Deo. 3, 226-231. 32. Chandra H.S. (1994).Proposed role of W chromo- other Encephalarfosspecies should also be 14. Davey C., Penning S. and Allan J. $997). CpG some inactivation and the absence of dosage com- encouraged to help overcome the methylation remodels chromatin structure ir pensation in avian sex determination. Proc.R. Soc. extreme genetic bottleneck for this aitro. I. MoI. Biol. 267,276-288. Lond. 8 258,79-82. 15. PL., Veenstra G.j.C., Wade PA., Vermaak D., 33. Pannell . Mixed genetic and environmen- unless the methylation or Jones J Q997). species Kass S.U. et aI. (7998). Methylated DNA and tal sex determination in an androdioecious popu- demethylation treatments add substan- MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress lation of Mercurialis annua. Heredity 78,50-56. tial genetic variation to the nascent transcription. N ature Gen. 19, 187-191. 34. Tucker K.L., Beard C., Dausmann J., Jackson- P.W. (1996). females. 16. Nan X.S., Ng H.H., Johnson C.A., Laherty C.D., Grusby L., Laird et aI. Germline Turner B.M. et aI. (1998). Transcriptional repres- passage is required for establishment of methyla- Putting these ideas into practice will sion by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 tion and expression patterns of imprinted but not require an enormous amount of work and involves a histone deacetylase complex. Nature of nonimprinted genes. GenesD eo.10, 1008-1020. good fortune. Even if attempts to change 393,386-389. 35. Osborne R. and Gorelick R. (in press). Sex change 17. Derreumaux S., Chaoui M., Tevanian G. and in cycads. Palms €t Cycads. the sex and regenerate roots and shoots of Fermandjian S. (2001). Impact of CpG methyla- 36. EickD., FritzH-J. and Doerfler W (1983).Quanti- the male clone of Encephalartosraoodii are tion on structure, dynamics and solvation of tative determination of S-methylcytosine in DNA unsuccessful, however, the proposed cAMP DNA responsive elerr.ent. Nucleic Acids Res. by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chro- 29,23142326. matography. AnaL Biochem.135, 1,65-17-1,. testing may still provide fundamental 18. Behe M. and Felsenfeld G. (1981). Effects of 37. Gehrke C.W and Kuo K.C. (1984). Quantitative insights into the biology of sex determina- methylation on a synthetic polynucleotide: the reverse-phase high performance chromatogra- tion in seed plants. B-Z transition in poly(dG-msdC)'poly(dG-m5dC). phy of major and modified nucleosides in DNA. Proc. Nntl. Acad. Sci. U9A78,1.619-'1623. J. Chromatogr. 301, 199219. We thank Sue Bertram, Bill Martin, and an anony- 19. McKay D.B. and Steitz TA. (1981). Structure of 38. Frommer M., McDonald L.E., Millar D.S., Collis mous reviewer for many helpful comments. Root catabolite gene activator protein at2.9 A resolu- C.M., Watt F. et aL (1992). A genomic sequencing Gorelick received support for this work via a summer tion suggests binding to left-handed B-DNA. protocol which yields a positive display of research fellowship from the Graduate College and Nature 290,744-749. S-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA Biology Department at Arizona State University. 20. Chattopadhyay D. and Sharma A.K. (1991). Sex strands. Proc. N ntl. Acad. Sci. U. S.A. 89, 1827-1831. determination in dioecious species of plants. 39. OlekA., OswaldJ. andWalter]. (1996).Amodified 1.. Norstog K.]. and Nicholls T.I. G997). The Biology of FeddesRepert. 102, 29-75. and improved method for bisulphite based cyto- Cycads.Cornell University Press, Ithaca. 21. Siljak-Yakovlev S., Benmalek S., Cerbah M., Coba sine methylation analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 2. Osborne R. (1985). Sex change in cycads - hope de la Pefla T, Bounaga N. et al. (1996). Chromo- 506+-5066. for woodiL Encephalartos2, 20-22. somal sex determination and heterochromatin 40. Galm O., Rountree M.R., Bachman K.E., Jair K.W, 3. Schlichting C.D. and Pigliucci M. (1998). structure in date palm. Sex. Plant Reprod. 9, Baylin S.B. and Herman I.G. (2002). Enzymatic Phenotypic Eoolution: A Reaction Norm Perspectioe. 127-1.32. regional methylation assay: a novel method to 117 Gorrespondence SouthAlrican Journal of Science98, March/Aptt2002

tion mechanisms and gene activity during devel- quantify regional CpG methylation density' Genet.L7,537-542. T (1995). Evidence for gene opment. Science187, 226-232- GenomeRes. 12, 1'53-1'57. 50. Holliday R. and Ho 60. Riggs A.D. (1975). X inactivation, differentiation, H'D., Chen C.M., Yan PS' and silencingby DNA methylation in normal human 41. Gitan R.S., Shi L4, CelI MoL Genet' 2\, and DNA methylation. Cytogenet Cell Genet. Huang T.H.M. (2002). Methylation-specific diploid fibroblasts. Somatic 9-17. oligonucleotide microarray: a new potential for 215-218. cells 61. Kaeppler S.M., Kaeppler H.F. and Rhee Y. (2000)' methylation analysis. Genome 51. Nyce J. $991). Gene silencing in mammalian high-throughput in of electroporated Epigenetic aspects of somaclonal variation Res.L2,158-164. by direct incorporation S'-phosphate. Somatic plants. Plant MoI.Biol. 43, 779-788. 42. Tamame M., Antequera F., Villanueva |.R' and 5-methyl-2' deoxcytidine 62. Finnegan E.j., Bretell R.I.S.and Dennis E.S.(1993)' Santos T (1933). S-azacytidine induces heritable Cell Mol. Genet.17, 543-550. Paulin R. (1996). Gene The role of DNA methylation in the regulation of biochemical and developmental changes in the 52. Holliday R., Ho T and In Epigenetic Mecha- plant gene expression. In DNAMethylation: Molec- fungus Aspergillus niger. l. Gen. Microbiol' 129' silencing in mammalian cells. VE.A. Russo, R' ular Biology and BiologicalSignit'icance, eds J.P Jost 2565-lDY+. nisms of Gene Regulation, ed. Birkh?iuser Verlag, Martienssen, A.D. Riggs, pp. 47-59' Cold Spring and H.P Saluz, pp. 21'8-261. 43. Jones PA. (1985). Altering gene expression with Cold Spring Harbo{, NY Basel. 5-azacytidine . CeIl 40, 485486. Harbor Laboratory Press, K', Deininger M. and 63. Mclachlan J.A., Burow M., Chiang TC. and Li S.F' 44. Bezdek M., Koukalov6 8., Brzobohaty B. and 53. Schluesener H.J., Seid oioo actl ation of rat (2001).Gene imprinting in developmental toxicol- Vyskot B. (1991). S-azacytidine-induced hypo- Schwab J. (2001).Transient in and astrocytes ogy: a possible inter{ace between physiology and methylation of tobacco HRS60 tandem DNA brain macrophages/microglial cells multiple CpG oligo- pathology. Toxicol.Lett. 120, 161'-\64. reneats in tissue-cult st e. Plant a 184' 487-490. by immunostimulatory L\3, 89-94- 64. Amasino R.M., Powell A'L.T and Gordon M'P 45. Giancotti P, Grappelli C., Poggesi I., Abatecola M', nucleotides. I. N euroimmunol. in cycads' (1984). Changes in T-DNA methylation and de Capoa A. et al. (1995). Persistence of increased 54. Osborne R. (1990). Micropropagation expression are associated with phenotypic varia- levels of ribosomal gene activity in CHO-K1 cells Mem. NY Bot. Gar. 57,82-88. (1982). A note on tion and plant regeneration in a crown gall tumor treated in vitro with demethylating agents. Mutat. 55. Koeleman A. and Small J.G.C. root tissue of some line. MoL Gen. Genet.797, 437.-446. Res.Lett. 348, 187-192. callus formation by stem and aft Bot. 1,'l'65-'l'66. 65. Jones PA. (1999).The DNA methylation paradox. 46. Albanesi T, Polani 5., Cozzi R. and Perticone P Encephalartosspecies. S ]. (,996). Somatic Trends Genet. L5, 34-37. (1999). DNA strand methylation and sister 56. J?iger A.K. and van Staden I. in 66. Parra R., Pastor M.T, Perez-Paya E. and Amo- chromatid exchanges in mammalian cells in vitro. embryogenesis and organogenesis E. natalensis.Plant CeIl Marco J.B. (2001).Effect of in vitro shoot multipli- Mutat. Res. 429, 239248 - Encephalartosdyerianus and cation and somatic embryogenesis on S-methyl- 47. Kovarik A., Koukalov6 8., Holy A' and Bezdek M. TissueOrgan Cult. 45,99-1'02. K.I. cytosine content in DNA of Myrtus communis L' (1994). Sequence-specific hypomethylation of the 57. Chavez VM., Litz R.E. and Norstog \1992). hildae Plant Growth Regul. 33,131'-736' tobacco genome induced with dihydroxy- In aitro morphogenesis of Ceratozamia and 67. Phillips R.L., Kaeppler S.M. and Olhoft P. (1994)' propyladenine, ethionine and S-azacytidine. and C. mexicana from megagametophytes Cult. 30' Genetic instability of plant-tissue cultures: break- F EBS Lett. 353, 309-311'. zygotic embryos. Plant CeIl TissueOrgan down of normal controls. Proc. NotL Acad. Sci. 48. Fieldes M.A. and Amyot L.M. (1999). Evaluating 93-98. K.I. usA.91.,5222-5226. potential of using S-azacytidine as an 58. Chavez VM., Litz R.E. and Norstog $992). the P and organogenesis in 68. Cafasso D .,Cozzolino S., Caputo P and De Luca epimutagen. Can. I. Bot.77, L677-1.622. Somatic embryogensis pumila. Plant CelI (2001). Maternal inheritance of plastids in 49. Holliday R. and Ho T (1991). Gene silencing in Zamia fisheri, Z. t'urt'uracea and Z' EncephalartosLehm. (Zamiaceae, Cycadales)' mammalian cells by uptake of S-methyl TissueOrgan Cult. 30,99-105. DNA modifica- Cenome44,)j9_24-.. deoxcytidine 5' phosphate. Somatic CeII MoI' 59. Holliday R. and Pugh J.E. (1975).