DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrated Watershed Management Plan Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, January 19, 2021 1:00 P.M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrated Watershed Management Plan Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, January 19, 2021 1:00 P.M Lakeland Industry and Community Association Box 8237, 5107W - 50 Street, Bonnyville, AB T9N 2J5 780 812-2182 780 812-2186 www.lica.ca Integrated Watershed Management Plan Committee Meeting Minutes Tuesday, January 19, 2021 1:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. Virtually via Microsoft Teams Present: Robert Machatis Amanda Avery-Bibo Roxane Bretzlaff Abdi Siad-Omar (arrived at 1:43 p.m.) Kellie Nichiporik Madison Arsenault Monty Moore Richard Bourgeois Randi Dupras Katherine Currie (left at 1:58 p.m.) Annette Hobart Al Bertschi Shana Langley Katlyn Degenhardt Observers and Guests: Bill Rogers Fin McDermid Rosey Radmanovich Sandi Riemersma, Palliser Environmental Services Ltd. Staff: Kristina Martel, LICA Executive Director Tricia Fleming, Environmental Coordinator Tina Johnson, LICA Administrative Professional Rachel Bates, Education & Outreach Coordinator Regrets: Jason Quinney Delano Tolley Mitch Sylvestre Clem Parenteau Richard Pearce Shelby Kennedy Maureen Delorme-Ouellette Dylan Landstrom Bob Buckle Integrated Watershed Management Plan Committee Minutes – January 19, 2021 Page - 1 ________ Initials 1.0 CALL TO ORDER Amanda Avery-Bibo, LICA Board Chairperson, called the meeting to order at 1:20 p.m. 1.1 Introductions 1.2 Attendance 1.3 Vision, Mission and Values 1.4 Approval of Agenda #1 Moved by Richard Bourgeois AND CARRIED that the January 19, 2021, Agenda be approved as presented. 1.5 Approval of Minutes 1.5.1 December 9, 2020 IWMPC Minutes - Draft #2 Moved by Monty Moore AND CARRIED that the December 9, 2020, Minutes be approved as presented. 2.0 ONGOING BUSINESS 2.1 Draft Beaver River IWMP Terms of Reference 2.1.1 Presentation of feedback and revisions Sandi from Palliser Environmental presented the feedback and revisions made to the Beaver River IWMP Terms of Reference (ToR) based on the IWMPC discussions held at the December 9th, 2020 meeting and feedback provided via email. 2.1.2 Draft Beaver River IWMP ToR The revised Beaver River IWMP ToR was presented to the Committee for review and approval. #3 Moved by Bob Machatis AND CARRIED that the Beaver River IWMP Terms of Reference provided by Palliser Environmental be approved as amended: • The addition of the forestry sector to the list of engagement session participants outlined within item 6.4 Format, Schedule, and Tools Integrated Watershed Management Plan Committee Minutes – January 19, 2021 Page - 2 ________ Initials 2.2 Engagement Session 1 2.2.1 Summary Document Sandi from Palliser Environmental presented the Summary Document, noting it will reflect the amended ToR document. #4 Moved by Roxane Bretzlaff AND CARRIED that the Summary Document be accepted as amended: • The addition of the forestry sector under Stakeholder Participants 2.2.2 Survey The IWMPC was presented with a survey intended to be distributed during engagement session 1. The Committee requested the following changes prior to approving the Survey: • Investigate whether an interactive map component can be included within the survey. • Consolidate questions regarding priority ranking. • Include one or more questions regarding survey format. An amended copy of the survey will be sent out via email for Committee approval. 2.2.3 Format and Expectations The Environmental Coordinator note that engagement sessions are likely to begin virtually to align with AHS guidelines. The format will include an overview of the IWMP followed by a discussion of issues in the watershed. The meeting will conclude with an evaluation of the engagement session. It is the expectation of LICA that Committee members will attempt to attend the engagement session in their respective region. Due to time constraints between now and the first round of engagement sessions, the Committee will be engaged via email on final document review and approval rather than hosting another Committee Meeting. 3.0 ACTION LIST 3.1 Follow-up on Action List 3.1.1 December 9, 2020 The IWMP Committee reviewed the action list from the December 9, 2020, IWMP Meeting. Integrated Watershed Management Plan Committee Minutes – January 19, 2021 Page - 3 ________ Initials 4.0 UPCOMING MEETING DATES 4.1 LICA Board Meeting – January 21, 2021 4.2 Next Meeting – TBD The next meeting will be scheduled at the conclusion of the first round of engagement sessions. 5.0 ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 3:03 p.m. #4 Moved by Richard Bourgeois AND CARRIED that the meeting be adjourned. Approved on: _________________________ Date _________________________ Signature Integrated Watershed Management Plan Committee Minutes – January 19, 2021 Page - 4 ________ Initials BEAVER RIVER INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAFT Terms of Reference Note to IWMPC: The red text throughout the document represents revisions based on review and feedback. Prepared by: Palliser Environmental Services Ltd. (Draft 1: Nov 30, 2020) Revised January 11, 2021 Terms of Reference ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS LICA would like to thank the following people for their contribution to this Beaver River Integrated Watershed Management Plan Terms of Reference. LICA IWMP Committee Abdi Siad-Omar, Alberta Environment and Parks Al Bertschi, Portage College Annette Hobart, Alberta Energy Regulator Bob Buckle, City of Cold Lake Clem Parenteau, Métis Nation Region 2 Delano Tolley, Community Dylan Landstrom, Beaver Lake Cree Nation Fin MacDermid, Cold Lake First Nations Jason Quinney, LICA Board of Directors Katherine Currie, Town of Bonnyville Katlyn Degenhardt, MD of Bonnyville Kellie Nichiporik, Lakeland Agriculture Research Association Madison Arsenault, Youth Maureen Delorme-Ouellette, Fishing Lake Métis Settlement Mitch Sylvester, Moose Lake Watershed Society Monty Moore, Husky Energy Randi Dupras, Lac la Biche County Richard Bourgeois, Muriel Lake Basin Management Society Richard Pearce, Community Roxane Bretzlaff, Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. Robert Machatis, Cold Lake First Nations Rosie Radmanovich, First Nations Technical Advisory Committee Shana Langley, Military Shelby Kennedy, Kikino Métis Settlement Ex-officio Members Kristina Martel, Executive Director Rachel Bates, Education & Outreach Coordinator Tricia Fleming, Environmental Coordinator Cover Photo Credit Amber Martin Beaver River IWMP Palliser Environmental Services Ltd. Page i Terms of Reference TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................. ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 About This Document ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Previous Planning Initiatives ......................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Need for a New Plan ..................................................................................................................... 4 3.0 PURPOSE, INTENT, PLANNING CONTEXT AND SCOPE ...................................................................... 4 3.1 Purpose, Intent and Authority ...................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Legislative Policy and Planning Context ....................................................................................... 5 3.3 Scope ............................................................................................................................................. 5 4.0 PLANNING AREA ................................................................................................................................ 6 5.0 ISSUES, GOAL AND OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................ 8 5.1 Issues ............................................................................................................................................. 8 5.2 Goal ............................................................................................................................................. 10 5.3 Objectives.................................................................................................................................... 10 5.4 Indicators, Targets and Thresholds ............................................................................................. 12 5.5 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 12 5.6 Implementation Strategy ............................................................................................................ 12 5.7 Measuring Success ...................................................................................................................... 13 6.0 STAKEHOLDER, FIRST NATIONS AND MÉTIS ENGAGEMENT .......................................................... 13 6.1 Goal ............................................................................................................................................. 13 6.2 Objectives.................................................................................................................................... 13 6.3 Guiding Principles ....................................................................................................................... 13 6.4 Format,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volume 2: Baseline, Section 13: Traditional Land Use September 2011 Volume 2: Baseline Studies Frontier Project Section 13: Traditional Land Use
    R1 R24 R23 R22 R21 R20 T113 R19 R18 R17 R16 Devil's Gate 220 R15 R14 R13 R12 R11 R10 R9 R8 R7 R6 R5 R4 R3 R2 R1 ! T112 Fort Chipewyan Allison Bay 219 T111 Dog Head 218 T110 Lake Claire ³ Chipewyan 201A T109 Chipewyan 201B T108 Old Fort 217 Chipewyan 201 T107 Maybelle River T106 Wildland Provincial Wood Buffalo National Park Park Alberta T105 Richardson River Dunes Wildland Athabasca Dunes Saskatchewan Provincial Park Ecological Reserve T104 Chipewyan 201F T103 Chipewyan 201G T102 T101 2888 T100 Marguerite River Wildland Provincial Park T99 1661 850 Birch Mountains T98 Wildland Provincial Namur River Park 174A 33 2215 T97 94 2137 1716 T96 1060 Fort McKay 174C Namur Lake 174B 2457 239 1714 T95 21 400 965 2172 T94 ! Fort McKay 174D 1027 Fort McKay Marguerite River 2006 Wildland Provincial 879 T93 771 Park 772 2718 2926 2214 2925 T92 587 2297 2894 T91 T90 274 Whitemud Falls T89 65 !Fort McMurray Wildland Provincial Park T88 Clearwater 175 Clearwater River T87Traditional Land Provincial Park Fort McKay First Nation Gregoire Lake Provincial Park T86 Registered Fur Grand Rapids Anzac Management Area (RFMA) Wildland Provincial ! Gipsy Lake Wildland Park Provincial Park T85 Traditional Land Use Regional Study Area Gregoire Lake 176, T84 176A & 176B Traditional Land Use Local Study Area T83 ST63 ! Municipality T82 Highway Stony Mountain Township Wildland Provincial T81 Park Watercourse T80 Waterbody Cowper Lake 194A I.R. Janvier 194 T79 Wabasca 166 Provincial Park T78 National Park 0 15 30 45 T77 KILOMETRES 1:1,500,000 UTM Zone 12 NAD 83 T76 Date: 20110815 Author: CES Checked: DC File ID: 123510543-097 (Original page size: 8.5X11) Acknowledgements: Base data: AltaLIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges and Benefits of Approaches Used to Integrate Regional Monitoring Programs
    POLICY AND PRACTICE REVIEWS published: 07 July 2021 doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.666698 Challenges and Benefits of Approaches Used to Integrate Regional Monitoring Programs T. J. Arciszewski 1*, D. R. Roberts 1, K. R. Munkittrick 2 and G. J. Scrimgeour 3 1Resource Stewardship Division, Alberta Environment and Parks, Calgary, AB, Canada, 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 3Office of the Chief Scientist, Alberta Environment and Parks, Edmonton, AB, Canada Although challenging to develop and operate, some degree of integrated monitoring is often necessary, especially at regional scales, to address the complex questions of environmental management and regulation. The concept of integration is well- understood, but its practice across programs and studies can be diverse suggesting a broader examination of the existing general approaches is needed. From the literature, we suggest integration of monitoring can occur across three study components: interpretation, analysis, and design. Design can be further subdivided into partial and full integration. Respectively combining information, data, and designs, we further define these types of integration and describe their general benefits and challenges, such as Edited by: Juergen Pilz, strength of inference. We further use the Oil Sands Monitoring program in northern Alberta University of Klagenfurt, Austria as an example to clarify the practices common among integrated monitoring programs. Reviewed by: The goal of the discussion paper is to familiarize readers with the diverse practices of Costica Nitu, fi Politehnica University of Bucharest, integrated monitoring to further clarify the various con gurations used to achieve the wider Romania goals of a program. Paul Makar, Environment and Climate Change Keywords: environmental monitoring, integrated monitoring, oil sands, regional monitoring program, environmental Canada, Canada managemenent *Correspondence: T.
    [Show full text]
  • Cold Lake Health Assessment FINAL
    Cold Lake Health Assessment A study under the Regional Waterline Strategy and Governance Model Development Project Prepared for: Town of Bonnyville, City of Cold Lake, and Municipal District of Bonnyville Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Project No.: 113929476 FINAL April 7, 2017 Sign-off Sheet This document entitled Cold Lake Health Assessment was prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd. This document entitled Cold Lake Health Assessment was prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd. (“Stantec”) for the account of the Partnership (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by L. Karoliina Munter, M.Sc., P.Biol. Co-authors: Seifu Guangul, Ph.D., P.Eng, D.WRE Nick De Carlo, B.Sc., P.Biol., QWSP Stuart Morrison, Dip. B.Sc. Greg Schatz, M.Sc., P.Biol Reviewed by John Orwin, Ph.D., P.Geo.
    [Show full text]
  • RURAL ECONOMY Ciecnmiiuationofsiishiaig Activity Uthern All
    RURAL ECONOMY ciEcnmiIuationofsIishiaig Activity uthern All W Adamowicz, P. BoxaIl, D. Watson and T PLtcrs I I Project Report 92-01 PROJECT REPORT Departmnt of Rural [conom F It R \ ,r u1tur o A Socio-Economic Evaluation of Sportsfishing Activity in Southern Alberta W. Adamowicz, P. Boxall, D. Watson and T. Peters Project Report 92-01 The authors are Associate Professor, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton; Forest Economist, Forestry Canada, Edmonton; Research Associate, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton and Research Associate, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton. A Socio-Economic Evaluation of Sportsfishing Activity in Southern Alberta Interim Project Report INTROI)UCTION Recreational fishing is one of the most important recreational activities in Alberta. The report on Sports Fishing in Alberta, 1985, states that over 340,000 angling licences were purchased in the province and the total population of anglers exceeded 430,000. Approximately 5.4 million angler days were spent in Alberta and over $130 million was spent on fishing related activities. Clearly, sportsfishing is an important recreational activity and the fishery resource is the source of significant social benefits. A National Angler Survey is conducted every five years. However, the results of this survey are broad and aggregate in nature insofar that they do not address issues about specific sites. It is the purpose of this study to examine in detail the characteristics of anglers, and angling site choices, in the Southern region of Alberta. Fish and Wildlife agencies have collected considerable amounts of bio-physical information on fish habitat, water quality, biology and ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Pinehurst Lake Report
    THE ALBERTA LAKE MANAGEMENT SOCIETY VOLUNTEER LAKE MONITORING PROGRAM 2013 Pinehurst Lake Report COMPLETED WITH SUPPORT FROM: Alberta Lake Management Society’s LakeWatch Program LakeWatch has several important objectives, one of which is to collect and interpret water quality data on Alberta Lakes. Equally important is educating lake users about their aquatic environment, encouraging public involvement in lake management, and facilitating cooperation and partnerships between government, industry, the scientific community and lake users. LakeWatch Reports are designed to summarize basic lake data in understandable terms for a lay audience and are not meant to be a complete synopsis of information about specific lakes. Additional information is available for many lakes that have been included in LakeWatch and readers requiring more information are encouraged to seek those sources. ALMS would like to thank all who express interest in Alberta’s aquatic environments and particularly those who have participated in the LakeWatch program. These people prove that ecological apathy can be overcome and give us hope that our water resources will not be the limiting factor in the health of our environment. Acknowledgements The LakeWatch program is made possible through the dedication of its volunteers. We would like to thank Samantha Sinclair, Matthew Warawa, and Amanda Lea with Lac La Biche County for their assistance with sampling in 2013. We would also like to thank Jared Ellenor, Nicole Meyers, and Elynne Murray who were summer technicians with ALMS in 2013. Program Coordinator Bradley Peter was instrumental in planning and organizing the field program. Technologists Chris Ware and Sarah Hustins were involved in the training aspects of the program.
    [Show full text]
  • Library Board Report (M
    BRAZEAU COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING March 14, 2017 VISION: Brazeau County fosters RURAL VALUES, INNOVATION, CREATIVITY, LEADERSHIP and is a place where a DIVERSE ECONOMY offers QUALITY OF LIFE for our citizens. MISSION: A spirit of community created through INNOVATION and OPPORTUNITIES GOALS 1) Brazeau County collaboration with Canadians has created economic opportunity and prosperity for our community. That we intentionally, proactively network with Canadians to bring ideas and initiative back to our citizens. 2) Brazeau County has promoted and invested in innovation offering incentives diversifying our local economy, rural values and through opportunities reducing our environmental impact. Invest in green energy programs, water and waste water upgrades, encourage, support, innovation and economic growth through complied LUB, promoting sustaining small farms, hamlet investment/redevelopment. 3) Brazeau County is strategically assigning financial and physical resources to meet ongoing service delivery to ensure the success of our greater community. Rigorous budget and restrictive surplus process, petition for government funding, balance budget with department goals and objectives. 4) Brazeau County has a land use bylaw and framework that consistently guides development and promotes growth. Promotes development of business that is consistent for all “open for business.” Attract and retain businesses because we have flexibility within our planning documents. 5) Come to Brazeau County to work, rest and play. This encompasses all families. We have the diversity to attract people for the work opportunities. We have recreation which promotes rest and play possibilities that are endless. 6) Brazeau County is responsive to its citizenship needs and our citizens are engaged in initiatives. Engage in various levels - website, Facebook, newspapers, open houses.
    [Show full text]
  • Enter Filename
    MOOSA CROSSOVER PROJECT ESA 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC SETTING This section of the ESA presents a summary description of the existing biophysical and socio-economic environment potentially affected by the Project. Results of field surveys conducted in 2012 and winter 2013 have been included in this ESA report. Vegetation and wildlife reconnaissance surveys were conducted in September 2012, and additional wildlife surveys were conducted in October 2012 and March 2013. Aquatic surveys were conducted in October 2012, and winter fisheries surveys were conducted in February 2013. Methods used to determine baseline conditions for each environmental or socio-economic resource are described in the relevant subsection. The Project is located in northeast Alberta, approximately 35 km northwest of Fort McMurray. The Project footprint is located within the Northern Alberta Lowlands Physiographic Region, and crosses Crown land in the Green Area of Alberta, including two watercourses. 5.1 Study Areas The spatial boundaries or study areas considered in the description of environmental setting and assessment of potential Project effects on the environmental components include one or more of the following: Project footprint, LSA, RSA, and socio-economic study area. These study areas were used to capture the potential direct and indirect effects of the Project on each VC and their associated KI, as well as to understand the context within which the effects can occur. The LSAs and RSAs used in the effects assessment vary by environmental and socio-economic element. The LSAs were established to assess the potential, largely direct effects of the Project on the local environment. Each VC and baseline setting component is considered in defining the LSAs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Municipal Affairs Population List | Cities 1
    2018 Municipal Affairs Population List | Cities 1 Alberta Municipal Affairs, Government of Alberta November 2018 2018 Municipal Affairs Population List ISBN 978-1-4601-4254-7 ISSN 2368-7320 Data for this publication are from the 2016 federal census of Canada, or from the 2018 municipal census conducted by municipalities. For more detailed data on the census conducted by Alberta municipalities, please contact the municipalities directly. © Government of Alberta 2018 The publication is released under the Open Government Licence. This publication and previous editions of the Municipal Affairs Population List are available in pdf and excel version at http://www.municipalaffairs.alberta.ca/municipal-population-list and https://open.alberta.ca/publications/2368-7320. Strategic Policy and Planning Branch Alberta Municipal Affairs 17th Floor, Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: (780) 427-2225 Fax: (780) 420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] Fax: 780-420-1016 Toll-free in Alberta, first dial 310-0000. Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2018 Municipal Census Participation List .................................................................................... 5 Municipal Population Summary ................................................................................................... 5 2018 Municipal Affairs Population List .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Specialized and Rural Municipalities and Their Communities
    Specialized and Rural Municipalities and Their Communities Updated December 18, 2020 Municipal Services Branch 17th Floor Commerce Place 10155 - 102 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5J 4L4 Phone: 780-427-2225 Fax: 780-420-1016 E-mail: [email protected] SPECIALIZED AND RURAL MUNICIPALITIES AND THEIR COMMUNITIES MUNICIPALITY COMMUNITIES COMMUNITY STATUS SPECIALIZED MUNICIPALITES Crowsnest Pass, Municipality of None Jasper, Municipality of None Lac La Biche County Beaver Lake Hamlet Hylo Hamlet Lac La Biche Hamlet Plamondon Hamlet Venice Hamlet Mackenzie County HIGH LEVEL Town RAINBOW LAKE Town Fort Vermilion Hamlet La Crete Hamlet Zama City Hamlet Strathcona County Antler Lake Hamlet Ardrossan Hamlet Collingwood Cove Hamlet Half Moon Lake Hamlet Hastings Lake Hamlet Josephburg Hamlet North Cooking Lake Hamlet Sherwood Park Hamlet South Cooking Lake Hamlet Wood Buffalo, Regional Municipality of Anzac Hamlet Conklin Hamlet Fort Chipewyan Hamlet Fort MacKay Hamlet Fort McMurray Hamlet December 18, 2020 Page 1 of 25 Gregoire Lake Estates Hamlet Janvier South Hamlet Saprae Creek Hamlet December 18, 2020 Page 2 of 25 MUNICIPALITY COMMUNITIES COMMUNITY STATUS MUNICIPAL DISTRICTS Acadia No. 34, M.D. of Acadia Valley Hamlet Athabasca County ATHABASCA Town BOYLE Village BONDISS Summer Village ISLAND LAKE SOUTH Summer Village ISLAND LAKE Summer Village MEWATHA BEACH Summer Village SOUTH BAPTISTE Summer Village SUNSET BEACH Summer Village WEST BAPTISTE Summer Village WHISPERING HILLS Summer Village Atmore Hamlet Breynat Hamlet Caslan Hamlet Colinton Hamlet
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Watershed Environmental Inventory Report for Moose Lake: Summary of Current Information
    STATE OF THE WATERSHED ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY REPORT FOR MOOSE LAKE: SUMMARY OF CURRENT INFORMATION PREPARED FOR: THE MOOSE LAKE WATER FOR LIFE COMMITTEE BONNYVILLE, ALBERTA PREPARED BY: 1 AQUALITY ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING LTD. 11216-23B AVENUE EDMONTON, AB T6J 4Z6 AND 2 ALBERTA ENVIRONMENT NORTHERN REGION 111 TWIN ATRIA BUILDING 4999-98 AVENUE EDMONTON AB T6B 2X3 WRITERS: 1 COLLEEN PRATHER, PH.D., P.BIOL. 2 THÉO CHARETTE, M.SC. 1 JAY WHITE, M.SC., P.BIOL. MAY 12, 2005 Moose Lake State of the Watershed Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Moose Lake is a popular recreational lake in M.D. of Bonnyville of central Alberta. Permanent residents, seasonal residents and daily users have long been concerned about the environmental quality of Moose Lake. Early documented concerns included algal blooms, weed growth, boating speeds, boating noise, polluted water, poor fishing, excessive crowds and excessive development. These concerns led to the development of a Municipal Area Structure Plan by 1980 that was updated in 1985. These plans focused primarily on residential land development but there was consideration for agricultural land development and the lake environment. The purpose of this report is to summarize and document all of the current environmental information for Moose Lake and the watershed. This is an initial step required for the development of the Moose Lake Watershed Management Plan. The development of this plan is led by the Moose Lake Water for Life committee but is guided by the Alberta Environment document Framework for Water Management Planning. There was a large resource of reports and experts consulted during the preparation of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/2014-Ghg-Emissions-From-Oil-Sands-Tailings-Ponds-Overview- And-Modelling-Based-On-Fermentable-Sub.Pdf (Accessed on 14 May 2021)
    minerals Review Geochemical Stability of Oil Sands Tailings in Mine Closure Landforms Heidi L. Cossey 1, Anya E. Batycky 1 , Heather Kaminsky 2 and Ania C. Ulrich 1,* 1 Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada; [email protected] (H.L.C.); [email protected] (A.E.B.) 2 Centre for Oil Sands Sustainability, Northern Alberta Institute of Technology (NAIT), Edmonton, AB T5G 0Y2, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-780-492-8293 Abstract: Oil sands surface mining in Alberta has generated over a billion cubic metres of waste, known as tailings, consisting of sands, silts, clays, and process-affected water that contains toxic organic compounds and chemical constituents. All of these tailings will eventually be reclaimed and integrated into one of two types of mine closure landforms: end pit lakes (EPLs) or terrestrial landforms with a wetland feature. In EPLs, tailings deposits are capped with several metres of water while in terrestrial landforms, tailings are capped with solid materials, such as sand or overburden. Because tailings landforms are relatively new, past research has heavily focused on the geotechnical and biogeochemical characteristics of tailings in temporary storage ponds, referred to as tailings ponds. As such, the geochemical stability of tailings landforms remains largely unknown. This review discusses five mechanisms of geochemical change expected in tailings landforms: consolidation, chemical mass loading via pore water fluxes, biogeochemical cycling, polymer degradation, and surface water and groundwater interactions. Key considerations and knowledge gaps with regard Citation: Cossey, H.L.; Batycky, A.E.; Kaminsky, H.; Ulrich, A.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Location and History Profile Summer
    Location and History Profile Created on 9/24/2021 12:50:13PM Summer Village of Argentia Beach Municipal Code: 0009 Location Description View Location Map (url to the pdf location map) Twp Rge Mer Longitude Latitude 47 1 W5 114°1' 53°3' Rural neighbour: County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 Incorporation History Municipal Boundary Document Search (url to search results page of Annexation PDF's) Status: Summer Village Effective Date: January 01, 1967 Authority: Ministerial Order 9/67 Authority Date: January 09, 1967 Gazette: Jan 31, 1967, p. 169 Comments: Withdrawn from the County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 and erected as the Summer Village of Argentia Beach. The Municipal Profiles are a compilation of statistical, financial, and other information about municipalities in the Province of Alberta . The information is based on reports submitted and data made available to Alberta Municipal Affairs as of today . The Ministry is not responsible for the accuracy of the information. Users are encouraged to verify the accuracy of the information contained in the Municipal Profiles before relying on it. 1 Contacts Profile Created on 9/24/2021 12:54:33PM Summer Village of Argentia Beach Municipal Code: 0009 Web Site: www.svofficepl.com PO Box 100,605-2nd Avenue Email: [email protected] Ma-Me-O Beach, AB T0C 1X0 Hours of Operation: Phone: 780-586-2494 9:00am-12:00pm Mon-Fri Fax: 780-586-3567 Mayor Don Oborowsky Email: [email protected] Councillors Randy Stebner Lisa Turchansky Chief Administrative Officer Sylvia Roy Email: [email protected] MLA & Constituency Honourable Rick Wilson, Maskwacis-Wetaskiwin The Municipal Profiles are a compilation of statistical, financial, and other information about municipalities in the Province of Alberta .
    [Show full text]