Clinical Experience with Tixocortol Pivalate

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Clinical Experience with Tixocortol Pivalate CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY Clinical experience with 1, tixocortol pivalate STEPHEN B. HANAUER. MD ease. In the United States, 100 m~ ABSTRACT: Tixocorcol pivalate, the 21-thiol derivative of hydrocortisone. is a hyd rocortisone rctcn tion enemas newly synthesized steroid with topical anti-inflammatory properties but is devoid of (Corccnema, Reid-Rowell) have become systemic glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid activities and toxicity. The mechanism the most widely prescribed local ther· of actic.•. appears to be similar to that of other corticosteroids with regard to steroid binding sites and prostaglandin biosynthesis, however. the disassociation between apy for distal colitis. However. contmu· local and systemic effects is due to a 'first pass' liver metabolism and rapid transfor­ ous therapy with topical hydroconi,one mation with in red blood cells. ln both open and controlled studies in patients with is complicated by the conscquenct's ot acute or recurrent distal colitis, clinical efficacy has been noted at doses of 2 50 mg to significant systemic absorption propor· LOOO mg in 100 ml solution without an effect on scrum cortisol levels or blood tional to the administered dose and chro­ chemistries. Tixocortol pivalace has consistently shown to be as effective as systemi­ nicity of treatmen t (7-9). cally absorbed steroids for the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis with out the unde­ Tixocor to! pivalate ( pregn-4-cne· sirable effects associated with currently available steroid preparations. Can J Gas­ 3.20-dione-2l-thiol- llb. 17 dihydroxy· troc nte rol 1988;2( 4 ): 156-8 21-pivalatc), the 21-thiol derivative of Key Words: Anri-in/lammaiory, Sreroid, Ulcerative colitis hydrocorcisone (Figure I ), 1s a newly syn· thcsizcd steroid with anti-inflammatory LCERATIVE COLITIS REMAINS A DIS· Shortly after the introduction of oral U order of unknown etiology ( l). Des­ cortisone as therapy for ulcerative coli­ ~"· pite potentially li fe threatening tis. Truelove (3, 4) described the use of CH,- a - co-C:-CH I I ' pancolonic and transmural inflamma­ topical hydrocortisone by rectal drip. tion, the inflammatory response is lim­ Sub sequent randomized, controll ed ~--·· '"· ited to the mucosa of the rectum and sig­ trials by Truelove (5) and Watkinson (6) moid in the majority of cases (2). The confirmed the effectiveness of 100 mg superfi cial nature and limited extent of intrarectal doses of hydrocortisonc 0 the inflammauon often make ulcerative hemisuccinate solutions compared to pla­ CH,OH colitis amenable to local (intrarectal} cebo in achieving clinical, sigmoidoscopic I treatment and histologic improvement of active dis- CH C•O . - OH Dcpanmen1 uj McJicmc, Uniwrnry of Clucago Medical Cencer, Chicago. //lmoi .1 .,.,; Corrc.1/m11Jcncc and rc/mnt1 Dr Scephcn B Hanaitl'T, Assis1an1 Profe.15or of Medicine, Secuon of 0 Gastrocnrerolugy, Un1wr111y of Ch1wgo, 1841 Sowh Maryland Avenue, Chicago, JL 60637, USA Thi, paper u-as J1rcsenwcl m Falk Sympomcm No 49 'Trends m mjlammawry bowel diseme Figure I) Molecular .11rnc111rc.111/ 1ix11cor1ol 1herafry hdJ ,11 Luke Loimc, Alherra , Apn/ 2().23. 1988 J11wlaw I wp! anJ hyJrocorn1one 156 CAN J GASTROENHROL Clinica l experience with tixocortol plvolote properties in animal models of inflam­ not receiving oral or local steroids, related side effects were observed in the mation (Sandoz Pharmaceuticals, data alth ough continued therapy with tixocorrol treated patients. T he only con­ on file). Moreover, it has the unique fea­ sulfasalazine was allowed and analyzed sistently significant laboratory parame­ tu re of topical an ti-inflammatory effects separately ( 13, 14). The trials all lasted ters found to be altered were the white without the typical hormonal and met­ for three weeks with weekly evaluations blood count which was increased abolic effects of systemic ab orption ( ll). of symptoms and signs of ulcerative coli­ (increased neutrophils, decreased lym­ Hence, tixocortol pivalatc is considered tis, hematologic and clinical chemistry phocytes and eosinophils) and the scrum the first of a new class, the 'nonsystemic' parameters, as well as determinations of potassium which was decreased in the steroids. 08:00 seru m cortisol levels. Proctoscopic hydrocortisone treated patien ts. Serum The mechanism of action of tixocorcol examinations were performed at base­ cortisol determinations, when measured, p1valate appears co be similar to that of line and after 14 and 22 days. were not reduced in either grou p at three other corticosteroids with regard to ste­ Symptoms of diarrhea, rectal bleed­ weeks. roid binding site~ and proscagland in b io­ ing, abdominal pain, rectal pain and gen­ Hence, after three weeks, tixocorcol synchesis. However, in both animal and eral malaise statistically improved in both pivalate was equall y effective as hydro­ human studies, ti xocortol pivalate was treatment groups, as did the number of cortisone therapy without systemic glu­ devoid of systemic glucocorticoid and bowel movements and the number of cocorticoid or mincralocorticoid effects. rnineralocorticoid activities, as well as bowel movements accompanied by Subsequently, a short term, four day toxicity, in most cases at dose levels as blood. There was a direct correlation study was performed comparing 250 mg high as 4000 mg/kg. While tixocortol with the severity of the symptoms at base­ ti xocorcol pivalate to a saline placebo pivalatc is absorbed co the same extent line and the degree of improvement; enema in 24 patients with ulcerative coli­ a,other steroids, including hydrocorti­ worse initial symptoms were associated tis or Crohn's disease of the rectum. Dur­ sone, the disassociation between local with a greater degree of improvement. ing this brief study, the symptoms of diar­ and systemic effects is due co a 'fi rst-pass' Likewise, endoscopic findings of colonic rhea. rectal b leeding a nd number of liver metabolism and rapid transforma­ hyperemia, ulceration and the physician's bowel movements, as well as procto­ rion within red blood cells ( Il, 12). overall rating of the colitis improved in scopic signs of crythcma, granu larity, both treatment groups by week 2 and mucopus and overall rating of colitis CLINICAL STUDIES contin ued to improve, such that by the improved in the tixocortol patients, Open studies: Both biological tolerance end of the th ree week study, 68% of the whereas no changes in symptoms or signs studies in patients with refractory proc­ tixocorcol pivalare and 75% of the hydro­ of inflammatory bowel disease were utis and multicen tre open studies in cortisone group had improved, and 34% observed in the placebo group (Tables I panents with acute or recu rren t distal of the tixocortol patients and 36% of the and 2). colitis have confirmed the absence of an hydrocortisone patients had healed (nei­ A randomized, double-blind, paral­ effect of tixocorcol pivalate on scrum cor­ ther proportion was statistica lly signifi­ lel group study also was conducted in usol levcls or other blood chemistries, cant between groups) (Figure 2). Patients 30 patients with ulcerative colitis to elu­ and apparent clinical efficacy using doses treated with sulfasalzine also improved cidate a dose response with higher doses of250 mg in LOO mL solutions (Sandoz in both groups. of tixocortol pivalate. Ten patients were Pharmaceuticals, data on file). Adverse reactions were typically mild, allocated to receive either 250 mg, 500 Controlled studies: Two m u lticen tre if reported. and no significant steroid mg or 1000 mg tixocortol pivalate in 100 controlled stud ies performed outside of the United States compared 250 mg tixocortol pi val ate enemas to 5 mg betame thasone phosphate with all TP HC TP HC patients receiving between l. 5 and 4 g 100 sulfasalazine. Over the three week course 90 of the studies, both enemas were well 106/141 an tolerated and equally effective in reduc­ 70 ing the symptoms of ulcerative colitis, 6 60 yet only the betamethasone increased 50 50 ;.!rum cortisol (Sandoz Pharmaceuticals, 41) 40 45/133 51/ 141 daraon fi le). 30 30 In the United States, three large, con­ 20 20 trolled, double-blind, randomized, 10 10 multicentre stud ies have compared 250 0 0 mgtixocortol pivalate enemas to 100 mg PERC ENT IMPROVED hydrocortisone enemas (Cortenema; PER CENT HEALED Reid-Powell) in a total of 337 patients F igure 2) Summary of rhree US conrmllcd crials of nxocorrol pii,alate I TP J 1oers1.s hydrocornwme ( HCJ with left sided ulcerative colitis who were e11ema.1 in acute ulcerntit•e col His. Outcome after three lt'eeks \ol 2 No. 4. November 1988 157 HANAUER TABLE 1 TABLE 2 Physician roting o f signs on day 4 Patient roting of symptoms compared to baseline Mucosal vascular pattern O Tixocortol pivalate Placebo Doy Doy Erythema T -< P Parameter 2 3 4 2 3 4 Granularity T -< P Diarrhea 0 0 < 0 0 0 Friability 0 Rectal bleeding 0 -< "< 0 0 0 Ulcerations O Abdominal pain 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mucopus T < P Rectal pain Summed severity Index T < P Nausea T Tixocortol pivoiote. P Plocebo Vomiting Change in appetite 0 0 0 0 0 0 ml solution over three weeks. At the Feeling of illness 0 -< < 0 0 0 conclusion of the study, no dose response Number of bowel movements 0 < -< 0 0 0 was identified in the entire group (Fig­ Number of bowel movements 0 -< -< 0 0 0 ure 3) or after analysis of the subgroups with blood of sulfasala zine treated or refractory patients. REFERENCES hemisuccinatc sodium. A controlled I. Kirsncr JB, Shorter RG Recent trial employing restricted ,cquential CONCLUSION developments in 'non-specifi c' analysis. Br Med J 1958;2: 1077-82 Tixocortol pivalate, the first of a new inflammatory howcl disease. N Engl J 7. Sherman LF, Tenner RJ. Schoulcr JL class of nonsystemic steroids devoid of Med 1982;306:775-85, 837-48. Trc::icmcnt of ulcerative colitis with glucocorticoid a nd mineralocorticoid Z.
Recommended publications
  • Steroid Use in Prednisone Allergy Abby Shuck, Pharmd Candidate
    Steroid Use in Prednisone Allergy Abby Shuck, PharmD candidate 2015 University of Findlay If a patient has an allergy to prednisone and methylprednisolone, what (if any) other corticosteroid can the patient use to avoid an allergic reaction? Corticosteroids very rarely cause allergic reactions in patients that receive them. Since corticosteroids are typically used to treat severe allergic reactions and anaphylaxis, it seems unlikely that these drugs could actually induce an allergic reaction of their own. However, between 0.5-5% of people have reported any sort of reaction to a corticosteroid that they have received.1 Corticosteroids can cause anything from minor skin irritations to full blown anaphylactic shock. Worsening of allergic symptoms during corticosteroid treatment may not always mean that the patient has failed treatment, although it may appear to be so.2,3 There are essentially four classes of corticosteroids: Class A, hydrocortisone-type, Class B, triamcinolone acetonide type, Class C, betamethasone type, and Class D, hydrocortisone-17-butyrate and clobetasone-17-butyrate type. Major* corticosteroids in Class A include cortisone, hydrocortisone, methylprednisolone, prednisolone, and prednisone. Major* corticosteroids in Class B include budesonide, fluocinolone, and triamcinolone. Major* corticosteroids in Class C include beclomethasone and dexamethasone. Finally, major* corticosteroids in Class D include betamethasone, fluticasone, and mometasone.4,5 Class D was later subdivided into Class D1 and D2 depending on the presence or 5,6 absence of a C16 methyl substitution and/or halogenation on C9 of the steroid B-ring. It is often hard to determine what exactly a patient is allergic to if they experience a reaction to a corticosteroid.
    [Show full text]
  • Contact Dermatitis to Medications and Skin Products
    Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology (2019) 56:41–59 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-018-8705-0 Contact Dermatitis to Medications and Skin Products Henry L. Nguyen1 & James A. Yiannias2 Published online: 25 August 2018 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Consumer products and topical medications today contain many allergens that can cause a reaction on the skin known as allergic contact dermatitis. This review looks at various allergens in these products and reports current allergic contact dermatitis incidence and trends in North America, Europe, and Asia. First, medication contact allergy to corticosteroids will be discussed along with its five structural classes (A, B, C, D1, D2) and their steroid test compounds (tixocortol-21-pivalate, triamcinolone acetonide, budesonide, clobetasol-17-propionate, hydrocortisone-17-butyrate). Cross-reactivities between the steroid classes will also be examined. Next, estrogen and testosterone transdermal therapeutic systems, local anesthetic (benzocaine, lidocaine, pramoxine, dyclonine) antihistamines (piperazine, ethanolamine, propylamine, phenothiazine, piperidine, and pyrrolidine), top- ical antibiotics (neomycin, spectinomycin, bacitracin, mupirocin), and sunscreen are evaluated for their potential to cause contact dermatitis and cross-reactivities. Finally, we examine the ingredients in the excipients of these products, such as the formaldehyde releasers (quaternium-15, 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3 diol, diazolidinyl urea, imidazolidinyl urea, DMDM hydantoin), the non- formaldehyde releasers (isothiazolinones, parabens, methyldibromo glutaronitrile, iodopropynyl butylcarbamate, and thimero- sal), fragrance mixes, and Myroxylon pereirae (Balsam of Peru) for contact allergy incidence and prevalence. Furthermore, strategies, recommendations, and two online tools (SkinSAFE and the Contact Allergen Management Program) on how to avoid these allergens in commercial skin care products will be discussed at the end.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0099225A1 Freund Et Al
    US 20090099225A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/0099225A1 Freund et al. (43) Pub. Date: Apr. 16, 2009 (54) METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF Related U.S. Application Data PROPELLANT GAS-FREE AEROSOLS FROM (63) Continuation of application No. 1 1/506,128, filed on AQUEOUSMEDICAMENT PREPARATIONS Aug. 17, 2006, now Pat. No. 7,470,422, which is a continuation of application No. 10/417.766, filed on (75) Inventors: Bernhard Freund, Gau-Algesheim Apr. 17, 2003, now abandoned, which is a continuation (DE); Bernd Zierenberg, Bingen of application No. 09/331,023, filed on Sep. 15, 1999, am Rhein (DE) now abandoned. (30) Foreign Application Priority Data Correspondence Address: MICHAEL P. MORRIS Dec. 20, 1996 (DE) ............................... 19653969.2 BOEHRINGERINGELHEMI USA CORPORA Dec. 16, 1997 (EP) ......................... PCT/EP97/07062 TION Publication Classification 900 RIDGEBURY RD, P. O. BOX 368 RIDGEFIELD, CT 06877-0368 (US) (51) Int. Cl. A63L/46 (2006.01) (73) Assignee: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma A63L/437 (2006.01) KG, Ingelheim (DE) (52) U.S. Cl. ......................................... 514/291; 514/299 (57) ABSTRACT (21) Appl. No.: 12/338,812 The present invention relates to pharmaceutical preparations in the form of aqueous solutions for the production of propel (22) Filed: Dec. 18, 2008 lant-free aerosols. US 2009/0099225A1 Apr. 16, 2009 METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF 0008 All substances which are suitable for application by PROPELLANT GAS-FREE AEROSOLS FROM inhalation and which are soluble in the specified solvent can AQUEOUSMEDICAMENT PREPARATIONS be used as pharmaceuticals in the new preparations. Pharma ceuticals for the treatment of diseases of the respiratory pas RELATED APPLICATIONS sages are of especial interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Wo 2008/127291 A2
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (43) International Publication Date PCT (10) International Publication Number 23 October 2008 (23.10.2008) WO 2008/127291 A2 (51) International Patent Classification: Jeffrey, J. [US/US]; 106 Glenview Drive, Los Alamos, GOlN 33/53 (2006.01) GOlN 33/68 (2006.01) NM 87544 (US). HARRIS, Michael, N. [US/US]; 295 GOlN 21/76 (2006.01) GOlN 23/223 (2006.01) Kilby Avenue, Los Alamos, NM 87544 (US). BURRELL, Anthony, K. [NZ/US]; 2431 Canyon Glen, Los Alamos, (21) International Application Number: NM 87544 (US). PCT/US2007/021888 (74) Agents: COTTRELL, Bruce, H. et al.; Los Alamos (22) International Filing Date: 10 October 2007 (10.10.2007) National Laboratory, LGTP, MS A187, Los Alamos, NM 87545 (US). (25) Filing Language: English (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (26) Publication Language: English kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AT,AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY,BZ, CA, CH, (30) Priority Data: CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, 60/850,594 10 October 2006 (10.10.2006) US ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, (71) Applicants (for all designated States except US): LOS LR, LS, LT, LU, LY,MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, ALAMOS NATIONAL SECURITY,LLC [US/US]; Los MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PG, PH, PL, Alamos National Laboratory, Lc/ip, Ms A187, Los Alamos, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, SV, SY, NM 87545 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • Patient Information
    Patient Information Tixocortol Pivalate Your TRUE TEST ® indicates that you have a contact allergy to Tixocortol Pivalate. Tixocortol pivalate and some related compounds in contact with your skin may result in dermatitis. Where is Tixocortol Pivalate found? Tixocortol pivalate is an anti-inflammatory agent that may be found in buccal, nasal, throat and rectal preparations, but not in topical medications for the treatment of skin diseases. Tixocortol pivalate is a marker for a specific class of corticosteroids used to treat skin inflammation. How to avoid Tixocortol Pivalate Avoid pharmaceuticals containing Tixocortol pivalate and other cross-reacting corticosteroids. Pharmaceuticals including corticosteroids are ingredient labeled. If you are strongly allergic a small amount of tixocortol pivalate in contact with your skin may cause an eczematous reaction, usually within 24 hours, that lasts for about a week. If you are weakly allergic the anti-inflammatory effect of tixocortol pivalate may mask the eczema and your skin will not heal. Pharmaceuticals used systemically such as tablets, inhalations and injections may also cause a skin reaction. Inform your healthcare providers that you are allergic to tixocortol pivalate and ask that they use products that are free of this allergen. 2012 ©SmartPractice Denmark Page 1 of 2 Other substances to which you may react o Hydrocortisone o Hydrocortisone acetate o Prednisolone o Prednisolone acetate o Fludrocortisone acetate o Methylprednisolone o Cloprednol You may also react to substances like: o Hydrocortisone-17-butyrate o Hydrocortisone-17-aceponate o Hydrocortisone-17-buteprate o Methylprednisolone aceponate o Prednicarbate A complementary test may be necessary to indicate your specific steroid intolerance.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Corticosteroid Orally Elicited Allergic Contact Dermatitis in A
    Multiple Corticosteroid Orally Elicited Allergic Contact Dermatitis in a Patient With Multiple Topical Corticosteroid Allergic Contact Dermatitis Ai-Lean Chew, MBChB, San Francisco, California Howard I. Maibach, MD, San Francisco, California Corticoid allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) may be llergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to topical topically or systemically elicited. Allergic contact corticosteroids is relatively common, having dermatitis to topical corticosteroids is relatively been reported in frequencies of 2.3 to 4.9% in A 1-5 common, whereas reports of orally elicited ACD to recent studies involving many patch-tested patients. corticosteroids are rarer. Patients allergic to one Patients allergic to one topical corticosteroid often corticosteroid often exhibit cross-reactivity to other exhibit cross-reactivity to other topical corticoids. corticoids. We have previously reported a 46-year- Corticosteroids may also sensitize subjects when used old woman with contact allergy documented by orally, parenterally, or intralesionally, although these patch and provocative use testing to multiple top- modes of sensitization are presumed less common. Re- ical corticosteroids. On further testing, she was actions to ingested, parenteral, or intralesional corti- thought to have multiple corticoid orally elicited coids usually occur in patients previously sensitized ACD to triamcinolone, methyl prednisolone, dex- by percutaneous absorption of a topically applied cor- amethasone, and prednisone. Oral provocation ticoid. Lauerma et al6 documented this phenomenon: tests were performed in a single-blind fashion fol- four patients who had known ACD to topical group lowing the method of Alanko and Kauppinen [Di- A corticosteroids all experienced cutaneous reactions agnosis of drug eruptions: clinical evaluation and following administration of oral hydrocortisone.
    [Show full text]
  • 3-6 July 2017 PRAC Meeting Minutes
    1 September 2017 EMA/PRAC/631448/2017 Inspections, Human Medicines Pharmacovigilance and Committees Division Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) Minutes for the meeting on 3-6 July 2017 Chair: June Raine – Vice-Chair: Almath Spooner Health and safety information In accordance with the Agency’s health and safety policy, delegates are to be briefed on health, safety and emergency information and procedures prior to the start of the meeting. Disclaimers Some of the information contained in the minutes is considered commercially confidential or sensitive and therefore not disclosed. With regard to intended therapeutic indications or procedure scopes listed against products, it must be noted that these may not reflect the full wording proposed by applicants and may also change during the course of the review. Additional details on some of these procedures will be published in the PRAC meeting highlights once the procedures are finalised. Of note, the minutes are a working document primarily designed for PRAC members and the work the Committee undertakes. Note on access to documents Some documents mentioned in the minutes cannot be released at present following a request for access to documents within the framework of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 as they are subject to on- going procedures for which a final decision has not yet been adopted. They will become public when adopted or considered public according to the principles stated in the Agency policy on access to documents (EMA/127362/2006, Rev. 1). 30 Churchill Place ● Canary Wharf ● London E14 5EU ● United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 3660 6000 Facsimile +44 (0)20 3660 5520 Send a question via our website www.ema.europa.eu/contact An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Contact Allergies in Patients with Leg Ulcers
    CONTACT ALLERGIES IN PATIENTS WITH LEG ULCERS Dissertation Submitted to THE TAMILNADU DR. M.G.R. MEDICAL UNIVERSITY In fulfilment of the regulations for the award of the degree M.D. DERMATOLOGY, VENEREOLOGY AND LEPROLOGY DEPARTMENT OF DERMATOLOGY, VENEROLOGY AND LEPROLOGY PSG INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE AND RESEARCH THE TAMILNADU DR.M.G.R.MEDICAL UNIVERSITY CHENNAI, TAMILNADU APRIL 2015 CERTIFICATE This is certify that the thesis entitled “ CONTACT ALLERGIES IN PATIENTS WITH LEG ULCERS” is a bonafide work of DR. REVATHI K. done under the direct guidance and supervision of DR. REENA RAI, MD, in the department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore in fulfillment of the regulations of Dr.MGR Medical University for the award of MD degree in Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology. DR. REENA RAI DR. C. R. SRINIVAS Professor Professor & Head of Dept. Dept. of DVL Dept. of DVL DR.RAMALINGAM Principal DECLARATION I hereby declare that this dissertation entitled “ CONTACT ALLERGIES IN PATIENTS WITH LEG ULCERS”was prepared by me under the direct guidance and supervision of DR. REENA RAI, MD, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore. The dissertation is submitted to the Tamilnadu Dr.MGR Medical University in fulfillment of the University regulation for the award of MD degree in Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology. This dissertation has not been submitted for the award of any other Degree or Diploma. DR. REVATHI K. CERTIFICATE BY THE GUIDE This is certify that the thesis entitled “ CONTACT ALLERGIES IN PATIENTS WITH LEG ULCERS” is a bonafide work of DR.
    [Show full text]
  • NA61: Tixocortol-21-Pivalate
    the art and science of smart patch testing® NA61: Tixocortol-21-Pivalate CAS#: 55560-96-8 Patient Information What are some products that may contain tixocortol-21-pivalate? Your patch test result indicates that you have a contact allergy to tixocortol-21- • Medications: pivalate. This contact allergy may cause your skin to react when it is exposed to – Creams this substance although it may take several days for the symptoms to appear. – Drops Typical symptoms include redness, swelling, itching, and fluid-filled blisters. – Lotions – Nasal sprays Where is tixocortol-21-pivalate found? – Ointments – Powders Tixocortol-21-pivalate is an anti-inflammatory topical corticosteroid used in – Rectal suspensions the treatment of rhinitis (as a nasal suspension or aerosols), pharyngitis (as • You May Also React to Products That Contain: lozenges), ulcerative colitis (as enema or rectal solution), and oral, inflammatory – Amcinonide conditions (as a suspension or a powder). It is also the principle screening – Budesonide substance for contact allergies to class A steroids. – Cloprednol – Desonide How can you avoid contact with tixocortol-21-pivalate? – Fludrocortisone acetate – Fluocinolone acetonide Avoid products that list any of the following names in the ingredients: – Fluocinonide • Tixocortol 21-pivalate – Flurandrenolide • Tixocortol pivalate – Halcinonide • 11beta,17-Dihydroxy-21-mercaptopregn-4-ene-3,20-dione 21-pivalate – Hydrocortisone • EINECS 259-706-4 – Hydrocortisone 17-butyrate – Hydrocortisone acetate • JO 1016 – Hydrocortisone
    [Show full text]
  • Corticosteroid Addiction and Withdrawal in the Atopic: the Red Burning Skin Syndrome MARVIN J
    Corticosteroid Addiction and Withdrawal in the Atopic: The Red Burning Skin Syndrome MARVIN J. RAPAPORT, MD MARK LEBWOHL, MD e recently reported 100 patients with a tum syndrome,” vulvodynia, anal atrophoderma, chronic eyelid dermatitis that did not resolve chronic actinic dermatitis, and “chronic eczema” in until all topical and systemic corticosteroids other body areas (Table 1). These conditions similarly W 1 had been discontinued. All of these patients had been resolved upon discontinuation of corticosteroids, sug- treated with long-term topical corticosteroids, usually gesting that a significant proportion of these syndromes with escalating dosage and frequency of application. In are attributable to chronic corticosteroid usage and the majority of patients, the initial symptom of pruritus “corticosteroid addiction.” The medical literature per- commonly evolved into a characteristic, severe burning taining to these syndromes usually has implicated sun sensation. In many cases, systemic corticosteroids had exposure, occult allergens, or psychosomatic reactions also been administered to relieve the severe erythema as the cause of ongoing skin eruptions.2–4 We consider and burning, but this only exacerbated the condition. In “corticosteroid addiction” of the skin to be the pertinent our opinion the continuing dermatitis resulted from etiologic factor in the majority of these patients. “steroid addiction.” Unfortunately, the time required for corticosteroid withdrawal mirrored the time over Syndromes which they had originally been applied, and was often Red Face Syndrome protracted. Examination of eyelid skin usually revealed atrophy Two hundred and one patients with chronic red face and telangiectasia. Patch testing, including four differ- syndrome were seen, 80% of whom began with eyelid ent corticosteroid allergens, demonstrated only irritant dermatitis.
    [Show full text]
  • Patch-Testing with Serial Dilutions of Tixocortol Pivalate and Potential Cross-Reactive Substances
    Acta Derm Venereol 2000; 80: 33±38 Patch-testing with Serial Dilutions of Tixocortol Pivalate and Potential Cross-reactive Substances MARLE NE ISAKSSON1, MAGNUS BRUZE1, AN GOOSSENS2 and JEAN-PIERRE LEPOITTEVIN3 1Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, MalmoÈ University Hospital, MalmoÈ, Sweden, 2Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and 3Laboratoire de Dermatochimie associe au CNRS, Universite Louis-Pasteur, Clinique Dermatologique, Strasbourg, France Of patch-tested patients with dermatitis, 4 ± 5% are allergic to corticosteroids should therefore be able to cross-react with corticosteroids. Four groups of corticosteroids are recognized both these substances. (A ± D), where substances from the same group may cross-react. In order to investigate the potential cross-reactivity pattern We investigated the potential cross-reactivity pattern and dose- and dose-response relationship, a study was undertaken, in response relationship for several corticosteroids from group A. which patients allergic to tixocortol pivalate were patch-tested We also included the corresponding aldehyde to hydrocortisone, with other substances from group A. as this degradation product has been proposed to be Recent patch-test results (6) have shown, that positive immunogenic. Eleven patients shown to be allergic to tixocortol patch-test results to the more recently developed methyl- pivalate were patch-tested with several corticosteroids from prednisolone aceponate (MPA) (belonging to group D) group A, as well as with the aldehyde, all in serial dilutions. All correlate signi®cantly (pv0.01) with reactions obtained 11 reacted to both tixocortol pivalate and hydrocortisone. The with group A corticosteroids. We therefore also included dose-response relationship for the corticosteroids tended to be this non-halogenated corticoid diester in the patch-test similar to sensitizers lacking anti-in¯ammatory potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Reazioni Avverse Ai Corticosteroidi
    S.O.S.S.O.S. AllergologiaAllergologia ee ImmunologiaImmunologia ClinicaClinica Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze Responsabile : Dr. Maurizio Severino Stefania Capretti, Giuseppe Ermini, Maria L Iorno, Donatella Macchia , Sergio Testi Reazioni avverse ai corticosteroidi 12 aprile 2013 ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS Not predictable, usually not dose dependent, sometimes reactions to very small amounts Type A Type B 80% of all side effects 15-20% of all side effects Idiosyncratic reactions Hypersensitivity reactions Immune mediated Non immune mediate (drug allergy) “pseudoallergy” Predictable, strictly dose dependent Pharmacological side effects (e.g. gastrointestinal bleeding IgE - mediated under treatment with NSAID, or bradycardia with β bloker treatment) Non IgE - mediated Johansson SGO et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004 Hypersensitivity reactions Immediate reactions Nonimmediate reactions Are those occurring Are those occurring within 1 h more than 1 h after the last drug admistration after the last drug administration Basic structure of a corticosteroid molecule (hydrocortisone) • i corticosteroidi sono i farmaci più frequentemente usati per trattare le malattie allergiche • paradossalmente, sono stati riportati casi di reazioni di ipersensibilità, in alcuni casi anche reazioni con pericolo per la vita Rachid R JACI 2011 Pathophysiology corticosteroids Corticosteroids are low molecular weight compounds that act as haptens and need to bind to proteins to induce a hypersensitivity reaction. Bundgaard in 1980 suggested that corticosteroids were degraded to a Corticosteroid glyoxol corticosteroid glyoxol that then reacts with + arginine molecules of proteins to form the complete antigen. Arginyne molecules of proteins Complete antigen Bundgaard H. The possible implication of steroid-glyoxal degradation products in allergic reactions to corticosteroids.
    [Show full text]