DOCSLIB.ORG

Eurybase the Information Database on Education Systems in Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eurybase the Information Database on Education Systems in Europe Eurybase The Information Database on Education Systems in Europe The Education System in Austria 2008/09 Eurybase – Austria (2008/09) 1. POLITICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC BACKGROUND AND TRENDS....................................... 1 1.1. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1. Party system.......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2. EU membership..................................................................................................................... 2 1.2. MAIN EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE BODIES...................................................................................... 3 1.2.1. Legislative bodies.................................................................................................................. 3 1.2.2. The executive branch ............................................................................................................ 5 1.3. RELIGIONS...................................................................................................................................... 8 1.3.1. Legal basis ............................................................................................................................ 8 1.3.2. Statistics .............................................................................................................................. 10 1.3.3. Religious instruction ............................................................................................................ 10 1.4. OFFICIAL AND MINORITY LANGUAGES............................................................................................. 11 1.5. DEMOGRAPHIC SITUATION............................................................................................................. 12 1.6. ECONOMIC SITUATION................................................................................................................... 13 1.7. STATISTICS................................................................................................................................... 14 1.7.1. Demographic information .................................................................................................... 14 1.7.2. Asylum seekers in Austria ................................................................................................... 15 1.7.3. Economic developments ..................................................................................................... 15 2. GENERAL ORGANISATION OF THE EDUCATION SYSTEM AND ADMINISTRATION OF EDUCATION ......................................................................................................................................... 16 2.1. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................. 16 2.2. ONGOING DEBATES AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS .......................................................................... 18 2.2.1. Optimising school administration.........................................................................................18 2.2.2. Universities .......................................................................................................................... 19 2.2.3. Fachhochschule programmes ............................................................................................. 19 2.3. FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES AND BASIC LEGISLATION ...................................................................... 21 2.3.1. Public education .................................................................................................................. 21 2.3.2. Private education................................................................................................................. 21 2.4. GENERAL STRUCTURE AND DEFINING MOMENTS IN EDUCATIONAL GUIDANCE.................................. 23 2.4.1. Non-school establishments ................................................................................................. 24 2.4.2. Schools................................................................................................................................ 24 2.5. COMPULSORY EDUCATION............................................................................................................. 25 2.5.1. General compulsory schooling ............................................................................................ 25 2.5.2. Compulsory vocational training ...........................................................................................26 2.5.3. Accomplishment of compulsory education at private schools having public-law status ..... 26 2.5.4. Accomplishment of compulsory education by private tuition, and at schools without public- law status....................................................................................................................................... 27 2.5.5. Safeguards to enforce regular school attendance .............................................................. 27 2.6. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION............................................................................................................ 28 2.6.1. General administration at national level .............................................................................. 28 2.6.2. General Administration at Regional Level........................................................................... 33 2.6.3. General Administration at Local Level................................................................................. 36 2.6.4. Educational Institutions, Administration, Management ....................................................... 37 2.7. INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL CONSULTATION ...................................................................................... 40 2.7.1. Internal Consultation............................................................................................................ 40 2.7.2. Consultation involving Players in Society at large............................................................... 47 2.7.3. Educational guidance services............................................................................................49 2.8. METHODS OF FINANCING EDUCATION............................................................................................. 53 2.8.1. Financing and education budget of schools........................................................................ 53 2.8.2. Financing and education budgets of universities ................................................................ 54 2.8.3. Funding and education budgets of Fachhochschule institutions ........................................ 55 2.9. STATISTICS................................................................................................................................... 57 3. PRE-PRIMARY EDUCATION........................................................................................................... 58 3.1. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................. 59 3.2. ONGOING DEBATES AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................ 61 3.3. SPECIFIC LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK .............................................................................................. 62 3.4. GENERAL OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................. 63 3.5. GEOGRAPHICAL ACCESSIBILITY ..................................................................................................... 64 www.eurydice.org Eurybase – Austria (2008/09) 3.6. ADMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND CHOICE OF INSTITUTION/CENTRE.................................................. 65 3.7. FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR PUPILS' FAMILIES ................................................................................... 66 3.8. AGE LEVELS AND GROUPING OF CHILDREN .................................................................................... 67 3.9. ORGANISATION OF TIME ................................................................................................................ 68 3.9.1. Organisation of the Year...................................................................................................... 68 3.9.2. Weekly and Daily Timetable................................................................................................ 68 3.10. CURRICULUM, TYPES OF ACTIVITY, NUMBER OF HOURS................................................................ 69 3.11. TEACHING METHODS AND MATERIALS .......................................................................................... 70 3.12. EVALUATION OF CHILDREN .......................................................................................................... 71 3.13. SUPPORT FACILITIES................................................................................................................... 72 3.14. PRIVATE SECTOR PROVISION ...................................................................................................... 73 3.15. ORGANISATIONAL VARIATIONS AND ALTERNATIVE STRUCTURES.................................................... 74 3.16. STATISTICS................................................................................................................................. 75 4. PRIMARY EDUCATION...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Highland Park Public Schools Highland Park, New Jersey Mission Statement
    HIGHLAND PARK PUBLIC SCHOOLS HIGHLAND PARK, NEW JERSEY MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Highland Park School District is to provide the community with the finest educational services through respect for diversity and commitment to collaboration, continuous improvement, and achievement of excellence. The Highland Park Board of Education will hold a REGULAR PUBLIC MEETING on Monday, September 19, 2016, at 6:30 p.m., at the Middle School, 330 Wayne Street, Highland Park, New Jersey. This meeting will be broadcast live on hpschools.net and youtube.com. AGENDA: 1. Call to Order 2. Announcement of Notice The New Jersey Open Public Meetings Act was enacted to ensure the right of the public to have advance notice of and to attend the meetings of the public bodies at which any business affecting their interest is discussed or acted upon. In compliance with the Open Public Meeting Act, the Highland Park Board of Education has caused notice of this meeting setting forth the time, date, and location to be submitted for publication to the Home News Tribune and Star Ledger and posted on the Board’s website at least 48 hours in advance of this meeting. Members of the public who wish to address the Board will be given the opportunity to do so before the Board adjourns for the evening. 3. Roll Call 4. Recess to Executive Session Be It Resolved, pursuant to the Sunshine Act, N.J.S.A. 10:4-12 and 13, the Highland Park Board of Education will now meet in closed session to discuss litigation. This exemption is permitted to be discussed in closed session in accordance with N.J.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • VIENNA Young SCIENTISTS SYMPOSIUM
    VIENNA young SCIENTISTS SYMPOSIUM June 25-26, 2015 Vienna University of Technology http://vss.tuwien.ac.at/ Edited by: Richard Zemann Alexander Grill Irene Hahn Heinz Krebs Andrea Mayr Peter Eder-Neuhauser Bianka Ullmann © 2015 Published by Book-of-Abstracts.com Heinz A. Krebs Dipl.-Ing. Jubiläumsstrasse 17/2 2352 Gumpoldskirchen / Austria Printed and bound in the Czech Republic ISBN 978-3-9504017-0-7 Welcome from the Organizers The Vienna young Scientists Symposium (VSS) 2015 welcomes you to a new and innovative come-together for young researchers at the Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien). We chose the TU Wien anniversary year 2015 as an opportunity to focus on cooperation between researchers independent of their status and affiliation to an institute. We are glad, that the idea of this platform, which supports young researchers, enhances interdisciplinary work within the TU Wien, motivates cooperation between researchers and companies, and gives our colleagues the possibility to publish their results, was supported and accepted by so many people. More than 80 members of the TU Wien submitted an abstract and want to present their research during the VSS on the 25th and 26th June 2015. We are proud to present the collection of the contributions to the VSS in these proceedings. The collected abstracts provide a small overview of the scientific work that is taking place within the fields Material Science, Simulation, Mechatronics and Energy and Environment. In combination with the talks, the posters, the prototypes and discussions during the VSS, exchange of knowledge and the benefit from the interdisciplinary character of this event are enforced.
    [Show full text]
  • Are All Four-Day School Weeks Created Equal? a National Assessment of Four-Day School Week Policy Adoption and Implementation*
    Are All Four-Day School Weeks Created Equal? A National Assessment of Four-Day School Week Policy Adoption and Implementation* Paul N. Thompson* John M. Schuna Jr. Assistant Professor of Economics Assistant Professor of Kinesiology School of Public Policy School of Biological and Population Health Oregon State University Sciences 340 Bexell Hall Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97331 118H Milam Hall Corvallis, OR 97331 Katherine Gunter Emily J. Tomayko Professor and Extension Specialist Assistant Professor of Research School of Biological and Population Health Center for American Indian and Rural Health Sciences Equity Oregon State University Montana State University 247 Hallie E. Ford Center 308 Reid Hall Corvallis, OR 97331 Bozeman, MT 59715 Abstract: Four-day school weeks are used in over 1,600 schools across 24 states, but little is known about adoption and implementation of these types of school calendars. Through examinations of school calendars and correspondence with school districts, we have compiled the most complete four-day school week dataset to date. We use this unique database to conduct a comprehensive analysis of four-day school week policy adoption and implementation. We find adoption of four-day school weeks is often financially-motivated, and has generally remained a small, rural district phenomenon. These schedules feature a day off once a week – often Friday – with increased time in school on each of the remaining four school days that, on average, is nearly an hour longer than the national average among five-day schools. Four-day school week schedules average only 148 yearly school days, yielding yearly time in school that is below the national average for five-day schools despite the longer school days.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Learning in Austria: Towards a National Strategy and Beyond
    Global Learning in Austria: Towards a National Strategy and Beyond Neda Forghani-Arani University of Vienna (Austria) Helmuth Hartmeyer Global Education Network Europe and University of Vienna (Austria) Abstract This paper discusses the development of Global Learning in Austria, paying special attention to the process and outcome of the major undertaking of developing a national strategy.The first part of the paper provides a descriptive outline of the contextual development, while the second part conjoins the description of the process of strategy development with policy discourse analysis to ask how the idea of a pedagogical response to globalisation affects policy and how engaging with policy affects that idea. The concept of Global Learning as defined in the strategy document is examined in its orientation and intent using a conceptual framework that highlights differing approaches to global citizenship education, in an attempt to situate the Strategy’s conceptual approach in the broader international discourse. Keywords: Global Learning, global education, Austria, formal education, policy discourse analysis Introduction The history and development of Global Learning1 in Austria is diverse and complex. The term ‘Global Learning’ was first used in discussions on education in the early 1990s; its conceptual roots, however, go back several decades. From the outset, far- reaching international influences have shaped the discourse on the conceptual orientation of Global Learning in Austria. Today, many actors with various orienta- tions and approaches are active in the field. The conceptual and institutional development of Global Learning in Austria has been documented, described and examined in recent years (Hartmeyer, 2008; Forghani-Arani and Hartmeyer, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • NAFSA08-Germany
    GERMANY ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION GENERAL INFORMATION: Location: Germany is located in Central Western Europe. It is surrounded by the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Switzerland, Austria, Czech Republic, and Poland. In the North, Germany borders with the North Sea, Denmark, and Baltic Sea. Language(s) of Instruction: German Grading Scales: Generally, the conventional six-mark scale is used in individual student assessment in schools. The 15-point scale is used on the Zeugnis der allgemeinen Hochschulreife (Certificate of General University Maturity) awarded upon successful completion of a pre-university upper secondary school (Gymnasium) program. Conventional Gymnasiale Oberstufe (Higher Description six-mark scale Gymnasium Level) point system sehr gut (very good) well above required 1 13 – 15 standard 2 10 – 12 gut (good) fully meets required standard befriedigend (satisfactory) generally 3 7 – 9 meets the required standard ausreichend (adequate) generally meets 4 4 – 6 required standard, but with some deficiencies mangelhaft (poor) does not meet the required standard, but the basic 5 1-3 knowledge is there and deficiencies may be made up with time ungenügend (insufficient) deficiencies 6 0 too incomplete to make them up in a reasonable period of time Principal educational authority: The responsibilities of the Federal Government in education are defined in theGrundgesetz (Basic Law). Based on the Basic Law, education in each Land (state) is regulated by the appropriate administrative and legislative state authorities. Each state has its own Ministry of Education, regional, and local educational authorities. Educational reforms are implemented at the state level but discussed at the federal level through the Kultusministerkonferenz (Conference of Ministers for Education and Cultural Affairs)ю Academic Calendar: School year lasts 188 – 208 days (five-six day weeks) from August to July.
    [Show full text]
  • Paris Lodron Universität Salzburg Exchange Information 2013/2014
    Paris Lodron Universität Salzburg Exchange Information 2013/2014 Full legal Name of Institution Universität Salzburg Head of Institution O.Univ.-Prof. Dr. Heinrich Schmidinger, Rector Address International Relations Office Kapitelgasse 6 A – 5020 Salzburg, Austria Head of International Office Mag. Markus Bayer Outgoing Coordinator Hedwig Gratzer Tel.: + 43 662 8044 2043 E-Mail: [email protected] Incoming Coordinators Irina Veliz BA. Tel.: + 43 662 8044 2045 E-Mail: [email protected] Telephone (including country and area codes) + 43 662 8044 2040 Fax (including country and area codes) + 43 662 8044 154 E-mail address [email protected] Useful Web Pages WWW Internet Address http://www.uni-salzburg.at Homepage of the International Office http://www.uni-salzburg.at/international Course catalogue https://online.uni-salzburg.at/plus_online/webnav.ini (available two months prior to semester) Courses in English (as guideline) https://online.uni- salzburg.at/plus_online/wbSuche.LVSuche?pVortrags SpracheNr=2&pSpracheNr=2&pSjNr=1597 Welcome Guide (Brochure for exchange students) http://www.uni- salzburg.at/pls/portal/docs/1/1911191.PDF Academic Year 2013 / 2014 General Exchange Information Application deadlines June 30th 2013 for the winter semester December 31st 2013 for the summer semester Application form To be downloaded from our homepage: http://www.uni- salzburg.at/pls/portal/docs/1/1387185.PDF. The Application Form must be signed by the student and the home university Supporting Documents required to be submitted - CV with the Exchange Application - Statement of Purpose - Transcript of Records Orientation Week During the last two weeks of September and February, before each semester starts, the International Office organizes introductory events for incoming exchange students.
    [Show full text]
  • Austrian Research and Technology Report 2020
    Federal Ministry Federal Ministry � Federal Ministry Republic ofof AustriaAustria Republic of Austria Republic ofof AustriaAustria EdEducation, ucation, Science Climate Action, Environment, EdDigital ucation, and Science andand ResearchResearch Energy, MobiIity, andEconomic Research Aff airs Innovation and Technology Austrian Research and Technology Report 2020 Report under Section 8(1) of the Research Organisation Act on federally subsidised research, technology, and innovation in Austria This report was commissioned by the Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research (BMBWF), the Federal Ministry for Climate Action, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology (BMK), and the Federal Ministry for Digital and Economic Affairs (BMDW). It was written by a working group consisting of WPZ Research, the Centre for Social Innovation (ZSI) and the Austrian Institute for SME Research (KMU Forschung Austria) with the support of VDI/VDE Institute for Innovation and Technology (iit), Technopolis and the Industry Science Institute (IWI). Team of authors: Brigitte Ecker (Coordination, WPZ Research), Philipp Brunner (IWI), Tobias Dudenbostel (Technopolis), Helmut Gassler (ZSI), Gerald Gogola (WPZ Research), Ernst A. Hartmann (iit), Joachim Kaufmann (Austrian Institute for SME Research), Peter Kaufmann (Austrian Institute for SME Research), Stefan Krabel (iit), Elisabeth Nindl (Austrian Institute for SME Research), Sascha Ruhland (Austrian Institute for SME Research), Sascha Sardadvar (WPZ Research), Christine Seth (iit), Herwig W.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Education Eligibility Q & A
    SPECIAL EDUCATION ELIGIBILITY Q & A What is a Case Study Evaluation? Page 1 How does a Child Become Eligible for Special Education? Pages 2 - 3 What is an IEP? Pages 3 - 4 How is an IEP Developed? Page 4 What are Educational Placement Options? Page 5 WHAT IS A CASE STUDY EVALUATION? A case study evaluation encompasses a series of in-depth multidisciplinary diagnostic procedures conducted within an established time frame and designed to provide information about your child and the nature of the problems that may affect his/her educational development. These components may include the following: 1. Psychological testing, including analysis of intelligence, achievement, social/emotional status and personality functioning 2. Classroom observations and teacher’s report on academic progress 3. Social/Developmental History 4. Therapeutic Summary 5. Vision/Hearing screening and other reviews of relevant health history 6. Psychiatric Evaluation, if needed 7. Substance use screening and/or evaluation, if needed 8. Occupational therapy evaluation, if needed 9. Speech & language evaluation, if needed 10. Assessment of communication skills and motor abilities, if needed The nature and intensity of each component to be included will vary depending on the needs of your child and the type of existing information available. Upon completion of your child’s case study evaluation, a staffing will be scheduled with you, representatives from the school, and any other relevant professionals to discuss the findings and determine eligibility for special education and related services. Page | 1 HOW DOES A CHILD BECOME ELIGIBLE FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION? Based on the results of the case study evaluation, there are several official categories under which a child may be found eligible for special education and related services support.
    [Show full text]
  • EOSC and Citizen-Science
    bmbwf.gv.at The European Open Science Cloud - the Austrian experience Stefan Hanslik Technical Science Padova, 17. September 2018 bmbwf.gv.at EOSC-The European effort “The EOSC will allow for universal access to data and a new level playing field for EU researchers CERN, EMBL, ELIXIR, etc. Institutional repository Member State Infrastructure New provider/ service…” • Communication from the Commission to the European Parlament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee of the Regions- European Cloud Initiative - Building a competitive data and knowledge economy in Europe, COM(2016) 178 final • H2020 Programme Guidelines on FAIR Data Management in Horizon 2020 Version 3.0. 26 July 2016 • EOSC Declaration Brussels, 10 July 2017 • Commission Staff Working Document, Implementation Roadmap for the European Open Science Cloud, Brussels, 14.3.2018, SWD(2018) 83 final Stefan Hanslik • Council Conclusion EOSC, Brussels 29. Mai 2018, 9291/18 • Commission Decision of 27.8.2018, Setting up an Expert Group- Executive Board of EOSC Technical Science Padova, 17. September 2018 bmbwf.gv.at The Austrian (Use)-Case “Austrian Open Science Cloud-AOSC” Austrian Open Science Support Group (AOSSG) Research Infrastructures and huge Austrian transversal projects AOSSG was founded at the University of Vienna in 2016, and among other it produced a) the „USE CASE TU Wien AUSTRIA“ (participation to series of event and conferences, illustrating the research infrastructures in TU Graz Austria), b) AOSSG produced an „Austria Country Profile“, and c) worked as incubator fort he creation of Know-Center Graz IOSSG (Italian Open Science Support Group/ Members: Unversities of Bologna, Parma, Milano, Academy of Fine Arts Vienna Ca’Foscari Venezia, Politecnico Torino, Trento) ACONet (Austrian Academic Computer Network) AUSSDA - The Austrian Social Science Data Archive Research Data Alliance Austria Climate Change Center Austria (CCCA) Earth Observation Data Center (EODC) In November 2017 the workshop From Planning to Action.
    [Show full text]
  • The Four-Day School Week: Impact on Student Academic Performance
    Rural Educator 32(2) Winter 2011 The Four-Day School Week: Impact on Student Academic Performance Paul M. Hewitt University of Arkansas George S. Denny University of Arkansas Although the four-day school week originated in 1936, it was not widely implemented until 1973 when there was a need to conserve energy and reduce operating costs. This study investigated how achievement tests scores of schools with a four-day school week compared with schools with a traditional five-day school week. The study focused on student performance in Colorado where 62 school districts operated a four-day school week. The results of the Colorado Student Assessment Program (CSAP) were utilized to examine student performance in reading, writing, and mathematics in grades 3 through 10. While the mean test scores for five-day week schools exceeded those of four-day week schools in 11 of the 12 test comparisons, the differences were slight, with only one area revealing a statistically significant difference. This study concludes that decisions to change to the four-day week should be for reasons other than student academic performance. Key words: Four-day week; rural schools; flexible scheduling; school schedules; scheduling. Johnson and Strange (2009) reported that 10,572,790 Further research is required into the extent to which the US public school students (19%) attend school in a rural increased student test scores observed in KIPP schools is school district. Howley, Theobald, and Howley (2005) due to the longer instruction time or to the culture of claimed that the mainstream of society often believes that support and high expectations for academic achievement rural schools are, by their very nature, ineffective.
    [Show full text]
  • Schoen Consulting Claims Conference Holocaust Topline – AUSTRIA, US, CANADA March 2019 Screening Questions
    Schoen Consulting Claims Conference Holocaust Topline – AUSTRIA, US, CANADA March 2019 Screening Questions United States Canada Austria • {Age} 18 and older 100% Under 18 [TERMINATE] --1 General Awareness - Open Ended Questions Intro: Thank you for your participation in this survey. The next questions in the survey are about a particular historical topic – the Holocaust. These questions don’t have right or wrong answers, so please be as honest and open as you can. 1. Have you ever seen or heard the word Holocaust before? Yes, I have definitely heard about the 89% 85% 87% Holocaust Yes, I think I’ve heard about the Holocaust 7% 9% 9% No, I don’t think I have heard about the 3% 3% 2% Holocaust No, I definitely have not heard about the 1% 3% 2% Holocaust IF NO, SKIP TO Q9 2. In your own words, what does the term Holocaust refer to? OPEN ENDED WITH PRECODES (MULTIPLE ANSWERS ACCEPTED) Extermination of the Jews/Jewish people 62% 64% 58% Genocide generally 18% 19% 27% World War II 4% 32% 16% The Nazis 3% 24% 7% Adolf Hitler 3% 15% 6% Other 14% 8% 15% Not sure 3% 4% 5% 1 Throughout this document “--” indicates no response while a “blank space” indicates that the question or answer choice was not asked in that specific country. Schoen Consulting Claims Conference Holocaust Topline – AUSTRIA, US, CANADA March 2019 United States Canada Austria 3. Who or what do you think caused the Holocaust? OPEN ENDED WITH PRECODES (MULTIPLE ANSWERS ACCEPTED) Adolf Hitler 83% 48% 39% The Nazis 67% 19% 21% Jews 10% 3% 8% World War I 6% 3% 4% Germany 36% 12% 2% Antisemitism -- -- 2% Other 1% 18% 19% Not sure 4% 8% 6% 4.
    [Show full text]
  • In Austria: Progress Toward a Professional Model Or Status Quo?
    c e p s Journal | Vol.2 | No4 | Year 2012 91 The “New Doctorate” in Austria: Progress toward a Professional Model or Status Quo? Hans Pechar,*1 Gülay Ates2 and Lesley Andres3 • Until recently, both policy direction and public awareness of the Bologna Pro- cess has been focused almost unilaterally on the introduction of the Bachelor’s degree to European universities. This is understandable, as for most European countries, the Bachelor is a new academic degree. However, commencing with the Berlin Ministerial Conference (Realising the European Higher Education Area, 2003), reform of doctoral studies has been highlighted as a second equal pillar in the Bologna reform process. In this paper, we begin by providing an overview of the general policy background and the rationales that under- lie the attempts to restructure doctoral studies in Europe. Next, we focus on the specific situation in Austria, where peculiarities of the status quo collide with uniquely Austrian approaches to reforming doctoral education. Finally, through two case studies, we examine initial attempts – and related challenges – to implement the “New Doctorate” in Austria. Keywords: Bologna reform, doctoral studies, professional model, ap- prenticeship model, Austria 1 *Corresponding author. Faculty of Interdisciplinary Studies (IFF), Vienna Location, Institute of Science Communication & Higher Education Research, University of Klagenfurt, Austria [email protected] 2 Faculty of Interdisciplinary Studies (IFF), Vienna Location, Institute of Science Communication & Higher Education Research, University of Klagenfurt, Austria [email protected] 3 Department of Educational Studies, University of British Columbia, Canada [email protected] 92 the “new doctorate” in austria »Novi doktorat« v Avstriji: razvoj v smeri profesionalnega modela ali status quo? Hans Pechar,* Gülay Ates in Lesley Andres • Do pred kratkim so bili politične usmeritve bolonjskega procesa in seznanjanje javnosti o njem skoraj enoznačno osredinjeni na vpeljavo prve stopnje študija (Bachelor) na evropske univerze.
    [Show full text]