DOCSLIB.ORG

Download the Hon. Christopher Finlayson QC's Speech Here

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download the Hon. Christopher Finlayson QC's Speech Here 1 Negotiating historical settlements with Indigenous People – the New Zealand Experience Introduction The purpose of this address is to discuss the possibilities of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in New Zealand in disputes between the Crown and indigenous groups, and also in intertribal disputes. Many such disputes come before the courts of New Zealand, normally in the form of judicial review of some decision by the Crown. Court resolution obviously has its place but ADR offers a more expeditious and effective means of resolving many of the disputes in which I was involved in my nine years as Attorney-General of New Zealand and Minster for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations. Background Māori first came to New Zealand, probably from Japan or Taiwan via northern Polynesia, about 1000 years ago. They are divided into tribes or iwi, and each tribe consists of a number of sub-tribes or hapū. For example, for hundreds of years the hapū of Whanganui lived alongside the Whanganui River which flows from the central North Island down to the Tasman Sea. It is New Zealand’s longest navigable river. The hapū were known as the River People who lived in a narrow margin along the banks of the river. At one stage there were 140 river settlements. Some iwi have hundreds of hapū; others are very small and may only have a few hapū. In the early 19th Century, Europeans began visiting New Zealand on a regular basis and, in 1840, the Crown signed a treaty with Māori. This treaty, known as the Treaty of Waitangi, was a very short document which said:1 HER MAJESTY VICTORIA Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland regarding with Her Royal Favour the Native Chiefs and Tribes of New Zealand and anxious to protect 2 their just Rights and Property and to secure to them the enjoyment of Peace and Good Order has deemed it necessary in consequence of the great number of Her Majesty’s Subjects who have already settled in New Zealand and the rapid extension of Emigration both from Europe and Australia which is still in progress to constitute and appoint a functionary properly authorized to treat with the Aborigines of New Zealand for the recognition of Her Majesty’s Sovereign authority over the whole or any part of those islands—Her Majesty therefore being desirous to establish a settled form of Civil Government with a view to avert the evil consequences which must result from the absence of the necessary Laws and Institutions alike to the native population and to Her subjects has been graciously pleased to empower and to authorize me William Hobson a Captain in Her Majesty’s Royal Navy Consul and Lieutenant Governor of such parts of New Zealand as may be or hereafter shall be ceded to her Majesty to invite the confederated and independent Chiefs of New Zealand to concur in the following Articles and Conditions. Article the First The Chiefs of the Confederation of the United Tribes of New Zealand and the separate and independent Chiefs who have not become members of the Confederation cede to Her Majesty the Queen of England absolutely and without reservation all the rights and powers of Sovereignty which the said Confederation or Individual Chiefs respectively exercise or possess, or may be supposed to exercise or to possess over their respective Territories as the sole Sovereigns thereof. Article the Second Her Majesty the Queen of England confirms and guarantees to the Chiefs and Tribes of New Zealand and to the respective families and individuals thereof the full exclusive and undisturbed possession of their Lands and Estates Forests Fisheries and other properties which they may collectively or individually possess so long as it is their wish and desire to retain the same in their possession; but the Chiefs of the United Tribes and the individual Chiefs yield to Her Majesty the exclusive right of Preemption over such lands as the proprietors thereof may be disposed to alienate at such prices as may be agreed upon between the respective Proprietors and persons appointed by Her Majesty to treat with them in that behalf. Article the Third In consideration thereof Her Majesty the Queen of England extends to the Natives of New Zealand Her royal protection and imparts to them all the Rights and Privileges of British Subjects. There has been a vigorous debate over the meaning and effect of the Treaty, and whether the English version differs in meaning from the Māori version. For many years, the status and effect of the Treaty has been debated. Scholars have asked whether the Treaty has a status in international law, and whether, apart from the Treaty, Māori customary law has protection in common law. I will not address any of those issues in this speech. 3 Promises made at Waitangi were not kept. So, for example, in 1840 Māori owned most of New Zealand but within 100 years, they owned virtually nothing. This was because of: a. Dubious private and government land purchases. For example, the largest tribe in the South Island (Ngai Tahu) sold most of the South Island to the Crown for around 15,000 pounds (or about a fraction of a penny per acre). Promises were made about providing schools and hospitals but this never really happened. By the turn of the 20th century there were very few members of Ngai Tahu left. b. Raupatu or confiscation. This was land seizure sanctioned by Parliament. Māori land was confiscated from so-called rebel tribes who had objected to their land being taken. Some of the worst confiscations occurred in what are now the rich North Island dairy farming areas of Waikato and Taranaki. Tribes who supported the Crown, or who didn’t take sides in the disputes, fared little better because most of their land was taken as well. c. The Crown also established the Native Land Court which didn’t operate as a court so much as an agent of the Crown. Legislation passed in the mid-1860s converted customary lands (which were held in collective ownership) to individual title. Obtaining title was a very time consuming and expensive operation. To add insult to injury, those costs were generally borne by the Māori. It was not unheard of for both the hearings and surveying to absorb the entire value of the land so owners were left with nothing. When Europeans first came to New Zealand, local Māori took to capitalism and commerce very well. They exported fish over to New South Wales and trade with your colony was highly successful in other products like flax. Exports of other products went to Asia. Māori 4 owned flour mills throughout New Zealand. For example, over 50 were built in Waikato in the years following the signing of the Treaty. One of the great tragedies of New Zealand was that the actions of the Crown and settlers destroyed the commercial trade of the Māori and reduced them to penury. With the loss of land came the inevitable loss of population. At the time the Treaty was signed it was estimated that there were around 100,000 Māori but, by 1900, that population was reduced to around 40,000. Life expectancy figures were appalling. Today there are around 700,000 New Zealanders of Māori decent. Life expectancy figures are still behind Europeans (or Pakeha). In the years after the signing of the Treaty, not only land was lost. Indigenous language use declined. I remember meeting an elderly lady in a remote part of the North Island who told me that she was beaten at school for speaking Māori. That was the pattern throughout New Zealand for many years. Today only around 20% of the Māori population can speak its own language. A change of attitude In the early 1970’s there was a growing awareness of the aspirations of Māori and the need to start to address these longstanding historical grievances. In 1975 Parliament passed the Treaty of Waitangi Act, the preamble of which explains its purpose:2 Whereas on the 6th day of February 1840 a Treaty was entered into at Waitangi between Her late Majesty Queen Victoria and the Māori people of New Zealand: And whereas the text of the Treaty in the English language differs from the text of the Treaty in the Māori language: And whereas it is desirable that a Tribunal be established to make recommendations on claims relating to the practical application of the principles of the Treaty and, for that purpose, to determine its meaning and effect and whether certain matters are inconsistent with those principles. 5 Initially the Tribunal could only inquire into contemporary grievances, but its jurisdiction was enlarged in the mid-1980’s3 so that any Māori could claim that he or she, or any group of Māori of which he or she is a member, is or is likely to be prejudicially affected – a) “by any ordinance of the General Legislative Council of New Zealand, or any ordinance of the Provincial Legislative Council of New Munster, or any provincial ordinance, or any Act (whether or not still in force), passed at any time on or after the 6th day of February 1840; or b) by any regulations, order, proclamation, notice, or other statutory instrument made, issued, or given at any time on or after the 6th day of February 1840 under any ordinance or Act referred to in paragraph (a) of this subsection; or c) by any policy or practice (whether or not still in force) adopted by or on behalf of the Crown, or by any policy or practice proposed to be adopted by or on behalf of the Crown; or d) by any act done or omitted at any time on or after the 6th day of February 1840, or proposed to be done or omitted, by or on behalf of the Crown,— and that the ordinance or Act, or the regulations, order, proclamation, notice, or other statutory instrument, or the policy or practice, or the act or omission, was or is inconsistent with the principles of the Treaty, he or she may submit that claim to the Tribunal under this section.” This amendment has transformed the Crown/Māori relationship in the years following its passage.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parliamentary Scrutiny of Human Rights in New Zealand (Report)
    PARLIAMENTARY SCRUTINY OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN NEW ZEALAND: GLASS HALF FULL? Prof. Judy McGregor and Prof. Margaret Wilson AUT UNIVERSITY | UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO RESEARCH FUNDED BY THE NEW ZEALAND LAW FOUNDATION Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 2 Recent Scholarship ..................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 22 Select committee controversy ................................................................................................. 28 Rights-infringing legislation. .................................................................................................... 32 Criminal Records (Expungement of Convictions for Historical Homosexual Offences) Bill. ... 45 Domestic Violence-Victims’ Protection Bill ............................................................................. 60 The Electoral (Integrity) Amendment Bill ................................................................................ 75 Parliamentary scrutiny of human rights in New Zealand: Summary report. .......................... 89 1 Introduction This research is a focused project on one aspect of the parliamentary process. It provides a contextualised account of select committees and their scrutiny of human rights with a particular
    [Show full text]
  • CESCR, NZ LOIPR, Peace Movement Aotearoa, February 2016
    Peace Movement Aotearoa PO Box 9314, Wellington 6141, Aotearoa New Zealand. Tel +64 4 382 8129 Email [email protected] Web site www.converge.org.nz/pma ______________________________________________________________________________ NGO information for the 57th session of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, February 2016 List of Issues Prior to Reporting: New Zealand Overview 1. This preliminary report provides an outline of some issues of concern with regard to the state party's compliance with the provisions of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR, the Covenant). Its purpose is to assist the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (the Committee) with its preparation of the List of Issues Prior to Reporting (LOIPR) in advance of New Zealand's Fourth Periodic Report (the Periodic Report). 2. There are five main sections below: A. Information on Peace Movement Aotearoa B. Constitutional and legal framework C. Indigenous Peoples’ Rights (Articles 1, 2 and 15) i) Overview, ii) Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, and iii) Impact of the activities of New Zealand companies on indigenous communities overseas. D. Socio-economic conditions (Articles 2, 3, 7, 9 11, and others) i) Increasing levels of child poverty, ii) Right to an adequate standard of living: social welfare / paid employment, iii) Housing crisis, iv) Allocation of public spending E. The Optional Protocol to the Covenant 3. More detailed information will be provided on these and other issues in parallel reports from Peace Movement Aotearoa and other NGOs following the state party’s submission of the Periodic Report next year. Due to time constraints, we have not covered as many issues in this report as we would have liked to, and we therefore refer the Committee to the Human Rights Foundation’s report which covers a range of concerns that we share.
    [Show full text]
  • Do We Need Kiwi Lessons in Biculturalism?
    Do We Need Kiwi Lessons in Biculturalism? Considering the Usefulness of Aotearoa/New Zealand’sPakehā ̄Identity in Re-Articulating Indigenous Settler Relations in Canada DAVID B. MACDONALD University of Guelph Narratives of “métissage” (Saul, 2008), “settler” (Regan, 2010; Barker and Lowman, 2014) “treaty people” (Epp, 2008; Erasmus, 2011) and now a focus on completing the “unfinished business of Confederation” (Roman, 2015) reinforce the view that the government is embarking on a new polit- ical project of Indigenous recognition, inclusion and partnership. Yet recon- ciliation is a contested concept, especially since we are only now dealing with the inter-generational and traumatic legacies of the Indian residential schools, missing and murdered Indigenous women and a long history of (at least) cultural genocide. Further, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, with its focus on Indigenous self-determi- nation, has yet to be implemented in Canadian law. Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) presented over 94 recommendations and sub-recommendations to consider, outlining a long-term process of cre- ating positive relationships and helping to restore the lands, languages, David MacDonald, Department of Political Science, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph ON, N1G 2W1, email: [email protected] Nga mihi nui, nya: weh,̨ kinana’skomitina’wa’w, miigwech, thank you, to Dana Wensley, Rick Hill, Paulette Regan, Dawnis Kennedy, Malissa Bryan, Sheryl Lightfoot, Kiera Ladner, Pat Case, Malinda Smith, Brian Budd, Moana Jackson, Margaret Mutu, Paul Spoonley, Stephen May, Robert Joseph, Dame Claudia Orange, Chris Finlayson, Makere Stewart Harawira, Hone Harawira, Te Ururoa Flavell, Tā Pita Sharples, Joris De Bres, Sir Anand Satyananand, Phil Goff, Shane Jones, Ashraf Choudhary, Andrew Butcher, Hekia Parata, Judith Collins, Kanwaljit Bakshi, Chris Laidlaw, Rajen Prasad, Graham White, and three anonymous reviewers.
    [Show full text]
  • POLITICAL COMMENTARY Reflection on the 2014 Election: Implications for Women
    88 POLITICAL COMMENTARY Reflection on the 2014 election: Implications for women SUE BRADFORD This has not been a good election for women, unless perhaps you’re white, wealthy and suf- ficiently lacking in empathy to believe that John Key and his mates are going to do a good job for us all over the next three years. Whether considering the gender makeup of Parliament and Cabinet, the likely consequences of a National government for women and children over the next few years, or the melancholy fate of the parties of the left, the aspiration of pre-election initiatives like the Women’s Election Agenda appear somewhat dimmed by reality. Parliament A noticeable feature of the 51st Parliament is the reduced number of women elected, down to 37 out of 84, meaning that women make up slightly under 32% of MPs. The 2011 Parliament had 39 women MPs. High hopes that the maturation of MMP and the legacy of the Helen Clark era would mean a steady increase in the numbers of women entering Parliament have clearly not been met. Apart from the Greens, it is hard to identify much success among the major political parties in achieving greater gender balance among their elected representatives. Just 34% of Labour’s MPs are women (11 out of 32), meaning that their goal of reaching 45% women MPs by this election has fallen sadly short. Turning to the makeup of the power holders in National’s third term Cabinet, a pitiful six out of 20 full Ministers are women, with the highest ranked being Paula Bennett at number five.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2018 END-OF-LIFE CHOICE SOCIETY of NEW ZEALAND INC Issue 49 Member of the World Federation of Right to Die Societies
    February 2018 END-OF-LIFE CHOICE SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND INC Issue 49 Member of the World Federation of Right to Die Societies EDITORIAL - 2018 IS MAKE OR BREAK YEAR We have entered a critical new year for the cause we conservatives - are in a minority but they are bent on have been fighting four decades so far. fighting a campaign blatantly built on lies and Whether it will prove to be a happy one remains misinformation to stop us and overseas experience to be seen. shows they are funded by wealthy church coffers. For while we made history in December when We expect a better deal from Parliament's Parliament voted for the first time to allow an assisted Justice Select Committee than we received from the dying Bill to progress beyond the first stage, we can biased group that last considered the issue, but we have no doubts about the struggle ahead to win the have only until February 20 to make formal ultimate human right of the 21st century. submissions and we need all our members to make It has never been more important for every their voices heard. member of our society to do whatever they can to The committee then has until mid-September promote the right to die with dignity and persuade our to make its recommendations to Parliament before all politicians to go on and pass an enlightened law. MPs vote again on whether New Zealand will join 110 This is a make or break year. It has been 15 million Americans and millions more in Canada, years since Parliament last tackled the issue and if we Europe, South America and Australia with the right to miss out on this opportunity there will be another long allow our terminally ill who are suffering intolerably to gap before it faces it again.
    [Show full text]
  • School of Law Newsletter 2006
    School of Law Number 13, November 2006 Newsletter Law School Horizons From the Dean One of the decided benefits Any mention of student successes this year must of working in a law school include Rosara Joseph who not only managed as good as this is the to secure a Rhodes Scholarship for herself but From the Editors opportunity it gives to also a silver medal for mountain biking in the meet alumni, staff and Commonwealth Games. The Canterbury mooting This year, Elizabeth Toomey has joined students of remarkable team of Colin Fife, Justin Wall, James Shaerf and Ursula Cheer, and replaced Richard Scragg ability who have made a Janna McGuigan swept all before them in this on the editorial team. Many thanks significant contribution not year’s competitions and finished by representing to Richard for his sterling work on the only to the legal profession New Zealand at the Jessup International Law Newsletter for the last 10 years. Richard’s but to other walks of life. It is of course always Moot Court Competition in Washington DC. popularity as a teacher has meant that so an invidious task to identify particular staff, In addition to these very specific many of you have stayed in touch with the students or alumni, but the reunion which we accomplishments, staff of the School of Law Law School. Please don’t stop! We do hope held for those members of the School of Law who have continued to be extraordinarily prolific you continue to share your stories with the had graduated in 1965 and the years preceding in terms of their published scholarly output new(ish) editorial team.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER UNIVERSITY of the THIRD AGE No
    U3A WELLINGTON CITY NEWSLETTER UNIVERSITY OF THE THIRD AGE No. 111 February 2020 U3A Wellington City, PO Box 24529, Manners Street, Wellington, 6142 www.u3awellingtoncity.org.nz PRESIDENT’S LETTER Welcome to the U3A 2020 year and a special welcome to new members. We have just had our first 2020 committee meeting where the lecture programme for the first half of the year was presented. We are excited by the variety of topics with excellent speakers, including many that members suggested in our survey. Many thanks to Robin Halliday, Rae Julian and Doug Helps for the thoughtful, detailed and time- consuming work they have put into our programme. For 2020 we have added four more lectures. Our current membership is just over 1,100 but we have room for more and our hard-working Treasurer, Tony Thomson, is keen to increase our income to keep our finances in a healthy position. We are therefore having another membership drive. If you know anyone who hasn’t heard about U3A Wellington please let them know the variety of lectures and Special Interest Groups available for a subscription of just $35. We will have flyers advertising U3A that can be distributed at your club(s), local halls, retirement villages, church, etc. Many of the Special Interest Groups have been visited by Coordinator, Alan Wright, and he reports that several new groups have been suggested. Once these have been finalised we will let you know. If you are interested in joining any of the groups (or wish to start a new group) please contact the coordinator - details at the end of the Newsletter and on our website.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 16 AJHR 50 Parliament.Pdf
    APPENDIX TO THE JOURNALS OF THE House of Representatives OF NEW ZEALAND 2011–2014 VOL. 16 J—PAPERS RELATING TO THE BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE IN THE REIGN OF HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE SECOND Being the Fiftieth Parliament of New Zealand 0110–3407 WELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND: Published under the authority of the House of Representatives—2015 ARRANGEMENT OF THE PAPERS _______________ I—Reports and proceedings of select committees VOL. 1 Reports of the Education and Science Committee Reports of the Finance and Expenditure Committee Reports of the Government Administration Committee VOL. 2 Reports of the Health Committee Report of the Justice and Electoral Committee Reports of the Māori Affairs Committee Reports of the Social Services Committee Reports of the Officers of Parliament Committee Reports of the Regulations Review Committee VOL. 3 Reports of the Regulations Review Committee Reports of the Privileges Committee Report of the Standing Orders Committee VOL. 4 Reports of select committees on the 2012/13 Estimates VOL. 5 Reports of select committees on the 2013/14 Estimates VOL. 6 Reports of select committees on the 2014/15 Estimates Reports of select committees on the 2010/11 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations VOL. 7 Reports of select committees on the 2011/12 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations Reports of select committees on the 2012/13 financial reviews of Government departments, Offices of Parliament, and reports on non-departmental appropriations VOL. 8 Reports of select committees on the 2010/11 financial reviews of Crown entities, public organisations, and State enterprises VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the Executive Expenses Disclosure from 1
    MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE EXPENSES DISCLOSURE FROM 1 APRIL 2012 TO 30 JUNE 2012 Party Minister Wellington Out of Domestic Surface Sub Total Official Accommodation Wellington Air Travel Travel Internal Cabinet (Ministers only) Travel (Ministers (Ministers, Costs Approved Expenses only) Spouse and International (Ministers Staff) Travel (A) only) Act John Banks 3,568 - 5,311 8,729 17,609 - Total Act 3,568 - 5,311 8,729 17,609 - Maori Pita Sharples 6,940 446 16,769 53,573 77,692 46,365 Maori Tariana Turia 8,630 3,095 10,594 33,134 55,453 15,524 Total Maori 15,534 3,541 27,363 86,706 133,146 61,890 Allocated National John Key Crown Owned Property 348 9,830 63,666 73,844 112,253 National Bill English - 1,231 9,608 40,603 51,442 3,369 National Allocated Gerry Brownlee Crown Owned Property 184 6,967 18,158 25,309 72,934 National Allocated Steven Joyce Crown Owned Property 1,697 12,052 43,697 57,446 63,547 National Judith Collins 8,630 72 7,103 37,355 53,160 21,983 Allocated Dept National Tony Ryall Owned Property 762 8,092 14,295 23,149 2,390 National Hekia Parata N/A 1,839 8,385 21,643 31,868 6,614 National Chris Finlayson N/A 2,019 8,177 20,907 31,103 21,246 National Paula Bennett 8,825 452 7,188 21,089 37,554 - National David Carter 6,904 2,379 15,525 34,490 59,298 38,048 National Murray McCully 6,904 191 6,207 23,034 36,336 230,291 National Anne Tolley 8,630 794 9,143 11,088 29,656 11,247 Jonathan National Coleman 8,630 - 6,765 17,407 32,803 70,856 National Tim Groser 8,630 204 4,200 16,210 29,245 211,997 National Phil Heatley 8,630 497 12,049
    [Show full text]
  • Māori Participation and Representation
    Māori Participation and Representation: An Investigation into Māori reported experiences of Participation and Representation within the policy process post-MMP _____________________________________ A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Political Science Josephine Clarke _______________________________________ University of Canterbury 2015 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii ABSTRACT iv LIST OF TABLES v LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS vi GLOSSARY vii CHAPTER ONE Introduction and Literature Review 1 CHAPTER TWO Methodology 23 CHAPTER THREE Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 37 CHAPTER FOUR Marine and Coastal (Takutai Moana) Act 2011 65 CHAPTER FIVE Whānau Ora 86 CHAPTER SIX Conclusion 108 APPENDECIES A Māori Research Advisory Group Form 135 B Unstructured Interview Prompts 137 C Information Sheet 138 D Consent Form 140 E Regional Boundaries 142 BIBLIOGRAPHY 143 iii Acknowledgements There are a number of people and organizations that I would like to thank for their assistance during the writing of this thesis. Most importantly I would like to extend my gratitude all those who imparted their individual knowledge, experiences, perceptions and wisdom to this research as participants. I am especially grateful to Sue Rudman, the Bream Bay Trust and all the E Tu Whānau team who took me to Waitangi and facilitated not only countless interviews, but also gave me a remarkable experience of seeing Whānau Ora funding in action. Similarly I would like to thank another person, who wishes to remain anonymous, who went above and beyond to assist a fellow student in facilitating countless invaluable interviews within the South Island. Thanks also to Lindsay Te Ata o Tu MacDonald, Ripeka Tamanui-Hurunui and Abby Suszko for providing cultural guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Report on Activities
    New Zealand Magna Carta 800th Anniversary Commemorative Committee: Celebrating the Past; Reflecting on the Present; Imagining the Future 2015 Report on Activities https://magnacartanz.wordpress.com/ 1 Contents Section Title Page Part 1: Introduction 1. Executive Summary 3 Part 2: Reports on the Year’s Events and Initiatives 2. Events and Activities 5 --- Introduction 5 --- Parliamentary 6 --- Educational 7 --- Arts and Culture 8 --- Exhibitions 9 --- Cathedral Services 9 --- Conferences and Panels 10 --- Speakers and Talks 11 --- Summary 12 3. University of Auckland Magna Carta Lecture Series 13 --- Introduction 13 --- 6 July - Magna Carta & the Kiwi Constitution 13 --- 7 July - The Māori Magna Carta – Waitangi and Beyond 15 --- 8 July - Magna Carta Online – Security and Privacy in the Digital Age 16 --- 9 July - Magna Carta Beyond the Commonwealth – Migration and Refugees 17 --- 10 July - Magna Carta – Visions for the Future 18 Part 3: Public Engagement 4. Statistics and Feedback 19 --- Introduction - How we communicated with the public 19 --- University of Auckland Magna Carta Speaker Series 20 --- Other Statistics and Feedback 26 --- Summary 29 5. Media Coverage 30 --- Introduction 30 --- Radio 31 --- Television 32 --- Newspapers/Newspaper Websites 33 --- Other Websites 34 --- Magazines 35 --- Summary 35 Part 4: Conclusion 6. Conclusion 36 --- New Zealand Magna Carta 800th Anniversary Commemorative Committee 37 --- Acknowledgements 39 2 Section 1: Executive Summary The New Zealand Magna Carta 800th Anniversary Commemorative Committee in 2015 was chaired by Associate Professor Jennifer Lees-Marshment. Dr Stephen Winter served as deputy chair. Associate Professor Lees-Marshment was appointed by the Magna Carta 800th Anniversary Commemoration Committee in the UK to coordinate and lead efforts to celebrate Magna Carta in New Zealand in October 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Opposition Team
    DEPUTY LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION AMY ADAMS KANWAL SINGH BAKSHI MAGGIE BARRY ANDREW BAYLY PAULA BENNETT DAVID BENNETT CHRIS BISHOP SIMON BRIDGES SIMEON BROWN GERRY BROWNLEE Selwyn • Workplace List MP • Internal Affairs • North Shore Hunua • Building Regulation Upper Harbour • Children • Hamilton East Hutt South Tauranga • Shadow Leader of Pakuranga Ilam • Foreign Affairs • Relations and Safety, including Assoc Police Conservation • Assoc Commerce Women • Social Investment Food Safety • Racing • Police • Youth the House • Economic & Fisheries • Land Information Pike River • Justice Assoc Immigration Reg Development • Immigration LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION DAVID CARTER JONATHAN COLEMAN JUDITH COLLINS JACQUI DEAN MATT DOOCEY SARAH DOWIE BILL ENGLISH ANDREW FALLOON CHRIS FINLAYSON PAUL GOLDSMITH List MP Northcote Papakura Waitaki Waimakariri • Greater Invercargill National Security Rangitata List MP • Shadow Attorney List MP • Tertiary Education, State Owned Enterprises Health • Sport and Recreation Transport • Revenue Tourism • Small Business Christchurch Regeneration • Early Childhood Education -General • Commerce • Skills and Employment • Arts, Mental Health • Third Whip GCSB • NZSIS Culture and Heritage NATHAN GUY JO HAYES HARETE HIPANGO BRETT HUDSON STEVEN JOYCE NIKKI KAYE MATT KING NUK KORAKO BARBARA KURIGER MELISSA LEE Otaki List MP Whanganui List MP List MP Auckland Central Northland List MP • Treaty of Waitangi • Taranaki - King Country List MP • Broadcasting, Primary Industries Whānau Ora • Assoc Children ICT • Govt Digital Services
    [Show full text]