Foresight, Insight and Oversight: Enhancing Long-Term Governance Through Better Parliamentary Scrutiny

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Foresight, Insight and Oversight: Enhancing Long-Term Governance Through Better Parliamentary Scrutiny Foresight, insight and oversight: Enhancing long-term governance through better parliamentary scrutiny E wherawhera ana te matakana i te huarahi ki tua The keen eye probes the path to the future Jonathan Boston, David Bagnall and Anna Barry June 2019 Foresight, insight and oversight: Enhancing long-term governance through better parliamentary scrutiny E wherawhera ana te matakana i te huarahi ki tua The keen eye probes the path to the future Jonathan Boston, David Bagnall and Anna Barry, with Tui Head, Gabor Hellyer and Pavan Sharma June 2019 First printed in 2019 Institute for Governance and Policy Studies School of Government Victoria University of Wellington PO Box 600 Wellington © Institute for Governance and Policy Studies, Victoria University of Wellington We encourage you to make use of the content of this report, and therefore license its content under the Creative Commons Attribution licence, also known as CC-BY 4.0. The full terms of this licence are set out at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. In essence, when using the content of this report, you are free to share and adapt the content for any purpose, provided that you must do three things: give appropriate credit to the copyright holder, provide a link to the CC-BY 4.0 licence, and indicate if you made changes to the original content. ISBN 978-0-473-48292-3 Authors: Jonathan Boston, David Bagnall and Anna Barry Format: Softcover Publication Date: 06/2019 Foreword In New Zealand, our democratic government is one of our strengths. Our democracy operates on the basis of parliamentary sovereignty, where Parliament – made up of the elected representatives of the people – is the supreme power. Yet, like any human institution, our systems of governance are less than perfect and, more positively, capable of improvement following rational consideration. For various reasons, there are serious concerns that our systems are too focused on the immediate issues of the day and less on the variety of long-term problems that may be, or indeed are, around future corners. This report – a collaboration between the Institute for Governance and Policy Studies at Victoria University of Wellington and the Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives – addresses this problem in terms of setting out considered policy options to make government more accountable to Parliament, and hence the people, for the quality of its long-term decision-making. The report is a welcome, timely and systematic contribution to advancing a very important discussion on improving our democracy. The Institute is delighted to be associated with it. Dr Simon Chapple Director Institute for Governance and Policy Studies 1 FORESIGHT, INSIGHT AND OVERSIGHT: ENHANCING LONG-TERM GOVERNANCE THROUGH BETTER PARLIAMENTARY SCRUTINY Contents Foreword 1 Brief biographical notes 7 Acknowledgements 8 Executive summary 10 PART 1: INTRODUCTION 19 Chapter 1: The quest for better parliamentary scrutiny of long-term governance 20 Terminology – some clarifications 20 The rationale for this report 24 Assessing long-term governance and stewardship 26 The structure of this report 27 Conclusion 27 Chapter 2: Research methods 28 Introduction 28 Project team 28 Research questions 28 Data gathering, analysis and review 29 Literature review 29 Interviews and meetings 30 Case studies 31 Survey of legislatures in Commonwealth jurisdictions 31 Feedback and peer review 31 Evaluation of method 32 PART 2: ANALYSIS 33 Chapter 3: Assessing long-term governance and stewardship 34 Introduction 34 Ethical and legal basis for safeguarding future interests 34 Challenge of protecting long-term interests in a democracy 36 Assessing the quality of long-term governmental performance 39 New Zealand’s current policy framework for long-term governance 48 Conclusion 56 Chapter 4: The evolving policy context and the implications for parliamentary scrutiny of long-term governance 57 Introduction 57 A wellbeing approach and reforms to the Public Finance Act 58 State Sector Act reform 59 An independent fiscal institution 60 Other legislative and non-legislative proposals of relevance to parliamentary scrutiny 60 2 Chapter 5: Assessing parliamentary scrutiny of long-term governance 62 Introduction 62 Accountability and scrutiny 62 Layers of scrutiny 63 Barriers and challenges to scrutiny of long-term governance 70 Indicators 72 Assessing scrutiny of long-term governance in New Zealand 76 Legislating 77 Providing a government 82 Scrutinising and controlling government 84 Representing the public 109 Conclusion 113 Chapter 6: Overseas approaches, models and practices 114 Introduction 114 Long-term scrutiny arrangements in overseas parliaments 115 General observations 115 Legislature’s scrutiny of long-term governance – six approaches 117 Finland’s Committee for the Future 118 Scotland’s Futures Forum 121 Israel’s Knesset Commission for Future Generations (2001–2006) 126 The Future Generations Commissioner for Wales (2016–) and the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015 128 The provision of analytical, research and advisory services for legislatures 135 Lessons for New Zealand 137 Chapter 7: Framing the way forward: Options for reform 139 Introduction 139 Perspectives of interviewees 139 Developing an agenda for reform – important considerations 145 Options for reform 146 PART 3: PARLIAMENTARY REFORM 151 Chapter 8: Enhancing parliamentary scrutiny of long-term governance via changes to the Standing Orders 152 Introduction 152 Reforming the current structure and functions of select committees 153 Encouraging select committees to undertake particular kinds of long-term scrutiny 162 Other changes to enhance the quality of parliamentary scrutiny 165 Changes to encourage greater consideration of long-term matters by the House 168 Enhancing the engagement of parliamentarians on long-term issues 169 3 FORESIGHT, INSIGHT AND OVERSIGHT: ENHANCING LONG-TERM GOVERNANCE THROUGH BETTER PARLIAMENTARY SCRUTINY Chapter 9: Strengthening advice to Parliament on long-term governance 170 Introduction 170 The importance of evidence and independent advice 170 Options for enhancing Parliament’s access to evidence and independent advice 171 Conclusion 175 PART 4: BROADER REFORM OPTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 177 Chapter 10: Wider policy and constitutional reforms 178 Policy reforms 178 Constitutional and quasi-constitutional reforms 182 Chapter 11: Conclusions 186 The quality of long-term governance matters … 186 Long-term interests are often at risk from short-term political pressures … 186 Parliament plays a vital role in holding governments to account for their performance, including their long-term governance … 186 Parliamentary scrutiny of long-term governance in New Zealand is not systematic or robust … 187 Many options are available to improve parliamentary scrutiny of long-term governance … 188 A learning culture is imperative 188 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND APPENDICES 189 Selected bibliography 190 Appendices 197 Appendix 1: Policy development – parliamentary scrutiny of lon-term governance and stewardship 198 Appendix 2: Interviews and meetings 200 Appendix 3: Parliamentary Library research request response: Parliamentary scrutiny of government future thinking in Scandinavia, Ireland and the United Kingdom 202 Appendix 4: Parliamentary Library research request response: Auditing of long-term governance and policy in Canada, Australia, Ireland and the United Kingdom 212 Appendix 5: Parliamentary Library research request response: Parliamentary scrutiny of government future thinking in Germany 216 Appendix 6: Parliamentary Library research request response about statutory requirements imposing future-oriented obligations on central and local government 220 Appendix 7: Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) survey 223 Appendix 8: Summary of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association survey responses 225 4 Tables Table E.1: Options for enhancing parliamentary scrutiny of long-term governance 15 Table 3.1: Criteria for assessing anticipatory governance – with application in the context of parliamentary scrutiny of the executive 43 Table 3.2: New Zealand: policy initiatives in recent decades to enhance prudent long-term governance 48 Table 5.1: The multiple layers of parliamentary scrutiny 63 Table 5.2: Indicators for evaluating parliamentary scrutiny of long-term governance 75 Table 5.3: Summary assessment of current performance against relevant indicators – legislative function 82 Table 5.4: Summary assessment of current performance against relevant indicators – providing a government 84 Table 5.5: Summary assessment of current performance against relevant indicators – financial scrutiny 94 Table 5.6: Summary assessment of current performance against relevant indicators – briefings and inquiries 100 Table 5.7: Summary assessment of current performance against relevant indicators – consideration of reports of Officers of Parliament 105 Table 5.8: Summary assessment of current performance against relevant indicators – international treaty examinations 108 Table 5.9: Summary assessment of current performance against relevant indicators – representing the public 112 Table 7.1: Options for enhancing parliamentary scrutiny of long-term governance 147 Boxes Box 5.1: Inquiries – case studies 97 Box 6.1: Summary of CPA survey results 116 Box 8.1: Possible amendments to the Standing Orders for the establishment of a specialist function of long-term governance for an existing subject select committee 156 Box 8.2: Possible amendments to the Standing Orders for the establishment
Recommended publications
  • A Sea of Blue at Eden Park
    January 30 - February 5, 2020 | Every Thursday Vol. 2 | No. 67 | FREE www.indiannews.co.nz indiannews.nz indiannews_nz indiannewz theindiannews Ph: +64 9 846 8080 FOR YOUR BUSINESS & LIABILITY INSURANCE Call or make an appointment for FREE QUOTE to review your current insurance JUST ONE PLACE Contact Ram - P: 09-846 9934 | E: [email protected] FOR ALL FINANCIAL SERVICES YOU NEED Mortgage Brokers Insurance Brokers Accountants Asset Finance Brokers For Quality Insurance and HEAD OFFICE BRANCH OFFICE 35 Morningside Drive, St. Lukes Level 1/203 Great South Road PROFESSIONAL Quick Claims Mt. Albert, Auckland Manurewa, Auckland FINANCIAL Settlement Ph: 09 846 9934, Fax: 09-846 9936 Ram Vashist Ravi Mehta Rohit Takyar Ameesha Sachdev SOLUTIONS GROUP M: 021 401 535 M: 021 181 0076 M: 021 172 8962 M: 027 540 5748 www.professionalfinancial.co.nz | Email: [email protected] A sea of blue Vyom People First Mitra - at Eden Park India's first robot 'astronaut' (On pg. 8) Choose the company that puts People First • Full Property Management • 50% Discount on Letting fees • 23 Months no Management fees • Tenant selection service (On pg. 19) • Help with building Holi season investment portfolio India storms starts (On pg. 6) For more information contact Kris or Peter on 0800 99 88 66 or into Under-19 [email protected] (On pg. 19) World Cup semis LOOKING FOR Call or Quality childcarewith email us NOW! lower child to educator • Chinese New Year AQUALITY ratio guaranteed celebrations in NZ(Pg.9) Personalised CHILDCARE? learning plan • Republic Day celebrations(Pg.11) Extended hours Monday -Saturday Mahatma Gandhi's life in pictures 7am-10pm Ask for a free trial NOW! HR 20 hours free ECE 20 and WINZ subsidies ECE PH: 09 869 8700 Email: [email protected] No extra charges Terms and conditions apply* forlatepickup www.mothersnest.co.nz People First Real Estate Ltd Licensed REAA 2008 facebook/mothersnest (On pg.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 NEWS Colmar Brunton Poll 22 – 26 May 2021
    1 NEWS Colmar Brunton Poll 22 – 26 May 2021 Attention: Television New Zealand Contact: (04) 913-3000 Release date: 27 May 2021 Level One 46 Sale Street, Auckland CBD PO Box 33690 Takapuna Auckland 0740 Ph: (09) 919-9200 Level 9, Legal House 101 Lambton Quay PO Box 3622, Wellington 6011 Ph: (04) 913-3000 www.colmarbrunton.co.nz Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology summary ................................................................................................................................... 2 Summary of results .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Key political events ................................................................ .......................................................................... 4 Question order and wording ............................................................................................................................ 5 Party vote ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Preferred Prime Minister ................................................................................................................................. 8 Public Sector wage freeze .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Y Gwir Anrh/Rt Hon Carwyn Jones AC/AM Prif Weinidog Cymru/First Minister of Wales
    Y Gwir Anrh/Rt Hon Carwyn Jones AC/AM Prif Weinidog Cymru/First Minister of Wales Ann Jones AM Chair Committee for the Scrutiny of the First Minister National Assembly for Wales Cardiff Bay Cardiff [email protected] 29th March 2018 Dear Ann, I am writing in response to your letter of 15 March following my appearance before the Committee in Newtown on 16 February. My responses on each of your points are below. Welsh Government support for businesses participating in trade missions Developing new export business requires a certain level of investment of time and money from companies. The Welsh Government contributes to this investment with both free and subsidised advice and support. Companies should not see trade missions as the first step towards exporting. Whilst they are a good way of assessing the potential opportunities in a market, they require a significant amount of advance preparation to ensure companies can maximise the benefit from their time in market. A great deal of support is available to help companies prepare for the trade missions, much of which is free or heavily subsidised. As I mentioned in Newtown, sharing the cost demonstrates a joint commitment and partnership between the company and Welsh Government. The cost of participation is substantially subsidised and, if a company is serious about exporting, then this should not be a barrier to joining a trade mission. There are three different types of intervention to take a company to market which are: Food and Drink Trade Development visits; attendance at major trade shows; and multi-sector trade visits.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135Th Anniversary
    107th Congress, 2d Session Document No. 13 Committee on Appropriations UNITED STATES SENATE 135th Anniversary 1867–2002 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 2002 ‘‘The legislative control of the purse is the central pil- lar—the central pillar—upon which the constitutional temple of checks and balances and separation of powers rests, and if that pillar is shaken, the temple will fall. It is...central to the fundamental liberty of the Amer- ican people.’’ Senator Robert C. Byrd, Chairman Senate Appropriations Committee United States Senate Committee on Appropriations ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, TED STEVENS, Alaska, Ranking Chairman THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi ANIEL NOUYE Hawaii D K. I , ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania RNEST OLLINGS South Carolina E F. H , PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico ATRICK EAHY Vermont P J. L , CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri OM ARKIN Iowa T H , MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky ARBARA IKULSKI Maryland B A. M , CONRAD BURNS, Montana ARRY EID Nevada H R , RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama ERB OHL Wisconsin H K , JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire ATTY URRAY Washington P M , ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah YRON ORGAN North Dakota B L. D , BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado IANNE EINSTEIN California D F , LARRY CRAIG, Idaho ICHARD URBIN Illinois R J. D , KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas IM OHNSON South Dakota T J , MIKE DEWINE, Ohio MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana JACK REED, Rhode Island TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Staff Director CHARLES KIEFFER, Deputy Staff Director STEVEN J. CORTESE, Minority Staff Director V Subcommittee Membership, One Hundred Seventh Congress Senator Byrd, as chairman of the Committee, and Senator Stevens, as ranking minority member of the Committee, are ex officio members of all subcommit- tees of which they are not regular members.
    [Show full text]
  • Election 2016 – the Results & Moving Forward
    Election 2016 – The Results & Moving Forward RHODRI AB OWEN, POSITIF POLITICS @POSITFWALES @RHODRIABOWEN Election Result National Assembly of Wales Election 2016 Result: Welsh Labour 29 (-1) Plaid Cymru 12 (+1) Welsh Conservatives 11 (-3) UKIP 7(+7) Welsh Liberal Democrats 1(-4) 22 new Assembly Members Opposition spokespeople Housing, Poverty, Communities & Steel Sustainable Future, including on the Environment, Planning, Housing and the Wales Bill Communities, Childcare & Housing Equality, Local Government and Communities Committee To examine legislation and hold the Welsh Government to account by scrutinising expenditure, administration and policy matters encompassing (but not restricted to): local government; housing, community regeneration, cohesion and safety; tackling poverty; equality of opportunity and human rights. What’s happened so far post- election? Elin Jones AM (Plaid Cymru) appointed Presiding Officer Ann Jones AM (Labour) appointed Deputy Presiding Officer Carwyn Jones AM and Leanne Wood AM nominated for First Minister first week after election. Vote tied at 29-29. Second vote on 18th May: Carwyn Jones nominated unopposed The Deal Labour and Plaid Cymru have reached an agreement where Plaid can influence legislation and policy for the duration of the Fifth Assembly: Standing committees on legislation finance constitution National Infrastructure Commission Development Bank for Wales The new Welsh Government 4 senior Welsh Government members departed at the election – Huw Lewis, Edwina Hart, Leighton Andrews and senior special adviser Jo Kiernan. Cabinet Members Need to present a new, fresh image – virtually everyone gets a new job Except Kirsty Williams, everyone has been a minister before… Further reshuffle in a year or so to bring in truly new Members? Smaller government – overall number of Ministers reduced, less pressure on Labour backbenchers Housing priorities of the Welsh Government – manifesto commitments We will deliver an extra 20,000 affordable homes in the next term.
    [Show full text]
  • Hagley Oval Section 71 Proposal - Further Information Available
    SUBMISSION ON S71 CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT PLAN - HAGLEY OVAL. My name iss9(2)(a I was part of a group that took part in the Environment Court EC and attended each day for 5 weeks. I learned during that case and subseq uently, to be wary of anything Canterbury Cricket Trust CCT says and even more so what they don't say. I have put in a submission on behalf of HO H, concentrating on amenity. This is my personal submission dealing with the proposed changes requested by CCT and their impact on Hagley Park and its other users. I believe that the use of S71 in this instance is wrong. The ability to question expert evidence and present opposing expert evidence is essential in this sensitive proposal. The RMA is the vehicle t hat can provide this. The minister is no doubt aware of the section in the letter of expectation that advises her regarding the use of S71, where the RMA could be used instead. Also the amendment to the Regenerate act proposed by the current minister Megan Wood and passed unanimously by Parliament protecting Hagley Park from the Regen Act. https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard This states: "But what we are saying is that when it comes to Hagley Park and the protections that have been built up over that piece of land, it actually is time to return to business as usual. When it comes to that particular taonga in the centre of our city, we do need to be able to say, it is if the earthquakes never happened and it is as if the bespoke legislation that is put in place to aid our recovery and our regeneration does not exist...." And..
    [Show full text]
  • National Spokespeople Chart (190118)
    LEADER DEPUTY LEADER SIMON BRIDGES PAULA BENNETT AMY ADAMS KANWAL SINGH BAKSHI MAGGIE BARRY ANDREW BAYLY DAVID BENNETT DAN BIDOIS CHRIS BISHOP SIMEON BROWN Tauranga • National Upper Harbour Selwyn • Finance List MP • Internal Affairs North Shore • Seniors Hunua • Building and Hamilton East Northcote Hutt South Pakuranga Security and Social Investment & Social Shadow Attorney-General Assoc. Justice Veterans • Assoc. Health Construction • Revenue Corrections Assoc. Workplace Relations Police • Youth Assoc. Education • Assoc. Tertiary Intelligence Services • Drug Reform • Women Assoc. Finance Land Information and Safety Education, Skills & Employment Assoc. Infrastructure GERRY BROWNLEE DAVID CARTER JUDITH COLLINS JACQUI DEAN MATT DOOCEY SARAH DOWIE ANDREW FALLOON PAUL GOLDSMITH NATHAN GUY JO HAYES Ilam • Shadow Leader of List MP Papakura • Housing & Urban Waitaki Waimakariri Invercargill Rangitata • Regional List MP • Economic & Regional Otaki • Agriculture List MP • Whānau Ora the House • GCSB • NZSIS State-Owned Enterprises Development • Infrastructure Local Government Mental Health Conservation Development (South Island) Development • Transport Biosecurity • Food Safety Māori Education America’s Cup Planning (RMA Reform) Small Business Junior Whip Assoc. Arts, Culture & Heritage HARETE HIPANGO BRETT HUDSON NIKKI KAYE MATT KING NUK KORAKO BARBARA KURIGER DENISE LEE MELISSA LEE AGNES LOHENI TIM MACINDOE Whanganui List MP • Commerce & Auckland Central Northland List MP • Māori Development Taranaki - King Country Maungakiekie List MP • Broadcasting,
    [Show full text]
  • The New Zealand Constitutional Review Charles Chauval
    AUSTRALASIAN STUDY OF PARLIAMENT GROUP Annual Conference, Darwin 3-5 October 2012 “Constitutions – reviewed, revised and adapted” * * * * Paper by New Zealand MPs Charles Chauvel and Louise Upston “The New Zealand Constitutional Review” New Zealand is undertaking a constitutional review which stemmed from the confidence and supply agreement between the National Party and Maori Party after the November 2008 general election. A final report summarising the views of New Zealanders on constitutional issues will be submitted to the Cabinet by the end of 2013 and the Government then has six months in which to respond. A linking project is the Independent Review of MMP being undertaken by the Electoral Commission which will make its final proposals to the Minister of Justice by 31 October 2012. Background A constitution can be seen as the rules about how we live together as a country. Unlike most other countries, New Zealand does not have a law called “The Constitution.” Instead, the rules for how the country is governed are in what is often called an unwritten constitution. Most of it is in fact written down in various laws, rules, and practices - just not in a single document. Important elements of our constitution include: Laws passed by New Zealand‟s Parliament such as the Constitution Act 1986, the Electoral Act 1993 and the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 British laws adopted by New Zealand through the Imperial Laws Application Act 1988, for example the Magna Carta. ASPG: Charles Chauvel MP & Louise Upston MP Darwin, Australia: 3&5 October 2012 Page 1 The powers of our head of state, the Queen (or King) – for example the power to appoint the Governor-General, whose role is established by the Letters Patent Constituting the Office of Governor-General.
    [Show full text]
  • Appropriations for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 2019, and for Other Purposes
    H. J. Res. 31 One Hundred Sixteenth Congress of the United States of America AT THE FIRST SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen Joint Resolution Making consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2019, and for other purposes. Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2019’’. SEC. 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS. Sec. 1. Short title. Sec. 2. Table of contents. Sec. 3. References. Sec. 4. Statement of appropriations. Sec. 5. Availability of funds. Sec. 6. Adjustments to compensation. Sec. 7. Technical correction. DIVISION A—DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2019 Title I—Departmental Management, Operations, Intelligence, and Oversight Title II—Security, Enforcement, and Investigations Title III—Protection, Preparedness, Response, and Recovery Title IV—Research, Development, Training, and Services Title V—General Provisions DIVISION B—AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2019 Title I—Agricultural Programs Title II—Farm Production and Conservation Programs Title III—Rural Development Programs Title IV—Domestic Food Programs Title V—Foreign Assistance and Related Programs Title VI—Related Agency and Food and Drug Administration Title VII—General Provisions DIVISION C—COMMERCE, JUSTICE, SCIENCE, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2019 Title I—Department of Commerce Title II—Department of Justice Title III—Science Title IV—Related Agencies Title V—General Provisions DIVISION D—FINANCIAL SERVICES AND GENERAL GOVERNMENT APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2019 Title I—Department of the Treasury Title II—Executive Office of the President and Funds Appropriated to the President Title III—The Judiciary Title IV—District of Columbia H.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Chambers: Unicameral Or Bicameral?
    Legislative Chambers: Unicameral or Bicameral? Legislative Chambers: Unicameral or Bicameral? How many chambers a parliament should have is a controversial question in constitutional law. Having two legislative chambers grew out of the monarchy system in the UK and other European countries, where there was a need to represent both the aristocracy and the common man, and out of the federal system in the US. where individual states required representation. In recent years, unicameral systems, or those with one legislative chamber, were associated with authoritarian states. Although that perception does not currently hold true, there appears to be a general trend toward two chambers in emerging democracies, particularly in larger countries. Given historical, cultural and political factors, governments must decide whether one-chamber or two chambers better serve the needs of the country. Bicameral Chambers A bicameral legislature is composed of two-chambers, usually termed the lower house and upper house. The lower house is usually based proportionally on population with each member representing the same number of citizens in each district or region. The upper house varies more broadly in the way in which members are selected, including inheritance, appointment by various bodies and direct and indirect elections. Representation in the upper house can reflect political subdivisions, as is the case for the US Senate, German Bundesrat and Indian Rajya Sabha. Bicameral systems tend to occur in federal states, because of that system’s two-tiered power structure. Where subdivisions are drawn to coincide with other important societal units, the upper house can serve to represent ethnic, religious or tribal groupings, as in India or Ethiopia.
    [Show full text]
  • "Unfair" Trade?
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Garcia, Martin; Baker, Astrid Working Paper Anti-dumping in New Zealand: A century of protection from "unfair" trade? NZ Trade Consortium Working Paper, No. 39 Provided in Cooperation with: New Zealand Institute of Economic Research (NZIER), Wellington Suggested Citation: Garcia, Martin; Baker, Astrid (2005) : Anti-dumping in New Zealand: A century of protection from "unfair" trade?, NZ Trade Consortium Working Paper, No. 39, New Zealand Institute of Economic Research (NZIER), Wellington This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/66072 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen
    [Show full text]
  • Federalism, Bicameralism, and Institutional Change: General Trends and One Case-Study*
    brazilianpoliticalsciencereview ARTICLE Federalism, Bicameralism, and Institutional Change: General Trends and One Case-study* Marta Arretche University of São Paulo (USP), Brazil The article distinguishes federal states from bicameralism and mechanisms of territorial representation in order to examine the association of each with institutional change in 32 countries by using constitutional amendments as a proxy. It reveals that bicameralism tends to be a better predictor of constitutional stability than federalism. All of the bicameral cases that are associated with high rates of constitutional amendment are also federal states, including Brazil, India, Austria, and Malaysia. In order to explore the mechanisms explaining this unexpected outcome, the article also examines the voting behavior of Brazilian senators constitutional amendments proposals (CAPs). It shows that the Brazilian Senate is a partisan Chamber. The article concludes that regional influence over institutional change can be substantially reduced, even under symmetrical bicameralism in which the Senate acts as a second veto arena, when party discipline prevails over the cohesion of regional representation. Keywords: Federalism; Bicameralism; Senate; Institutional change; Brazil. well-established proposition in the institutional literature argues that federal Astates tend to take a slow reform path. Among other typical federal institutions, the second legislative body (the Senate) common to federal systems (Lijphart 1999; Stepan * The Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa no Estado
    [Show full text]