Ontario Public Service Employees Union September 30, 2001 VIA COURIER Mr. Ron Foerster The Walkerton Inquiry 180 Dundas Street West 22nd Floor Syndicat des Employé-e-s Toronto, Ontario de la Fonction Publique M5G 1Z8 de l’Ontario Re: Machinery of Government for Safe Drinking Water in Ontario Dear Mr. Foerster: We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Government’s response to Mr. D’Ombrain’s discussion paper. Despite the frustrating lack of source material, Mr. D’Ombrain has done an admirable job of mapping and explaining the machinery of the Ontario Government. He contributes far more than a simple schematic outline of government functions. Instead, he highlights some of the ambiguities and open questions that arise in the conflict between the form of a given administration and 100 Lesmill Road, the manner in which it actually operates. Toronto, Ontario M3B 3P8 Like all governments, the current administration has its own agenda, peculiarities, e-mail:
[email protected] www.opseu.org and cast of central players. In OPSEU’s submission, these less tangible ingredients of a government are no less important to understanding the policy- 100 chemin Lesmill, making process than a formal examination of the machinery of government. Toronto, Ontario M3B 3P8 courrier électronique It is our opinion that the Government’s response to Mr. D’Ombrain’s discussion
[email protected] paper entirely ignores the central issue of how the current administration actually www.opseu.org 1 functions. The Government’s formulaic rebuttal, by hewing so closely to a literal _________________ understanding of government decision-making, offers very little of value to the Commission’s work.