Community Development and Advocacy Forum Nepal Bardibas Municipality-4 Gauridanda, Mahottari Cell No.: +977 9854022997/974403659

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Community Development and Advocacy Forum Nepal Bardibas Municipality-4 Gauridanda, Mahottari Cell No.: +977 9854022997/974403659 Raising of Seepage Water Technology A Case Study of Irrigation Channel Improvement in Ratu River System Gauribas-8 Rajabas, Mahottari District, Nepal 1. Building Resilience of Vulnerable Communities in Ratu Watershed through Strengthening Disaster Preparedness and Climate Change Adaptation Measures Program in Mahottari & Dhanusha District,Nepal 2. Climate Advocacy Network Nepal : Strengthening Civil Society Organization and Community Response to Climate change Program in Mahottari & Dhanusha District,Nepal Ratu Watershed: Upstream of Mahottari District Bardibas Municipality # 6 , Rajabas Safe Narrative Progress Report st st (1 October – 31 December 2012) Project Partners Project Number: P323-004/2012 KH 2668 Final Project Progress Report - 2015 Community Development and Advocacy Forum Nepal Bardibas Municipality-4 Gauridanda, Mahottari Cell No.: +977 9854022997/974403659 Email: [email protected]/[email protected] Raising of Seepage Water Technology A Case Study of Irrigation Channel Improvement in Ratu River System Gauribas-8 Rajabas, Mahottari District, Nepal 1. Background Nepal is divided into five physiographic regions: Terai, Bhabar, Chure hills, Mid-mountain and high mountain. Among all the physiographic regions, the Terai, Bhabar and Chure exhibit the close relationship as upstream, midstream and downstream based on the River System Management (RSM) of Nepal. The proposed area of case study falls under the Chure region of Ratu River System in between the Mahottari and Dhanusa Districts, Nepal. To arrest the land degradation in the Chure, Bhabar and Terai Region, the Government and non-governmental organization of Nepal has been implementing many projects over the last few decades. These projects pioneered for watershed/river system management by developing technical packages based on different models. In fact, considerable variation in the concepts of implementation, the organizational structures and the degree of people's participation are found among the projects in the study. The project of the Community Based Disaster Risk Reduction (CBDRR) has focused its effort on disaster risk management using the participatory approach. Since the CBDRR's participatory approach has been found note worthy in different reports as a best example of participatory for disaster risk reduction and profit maximization through the construction, utilization and management of irrigation channel through the raising of seepage water in Nepal, which was chosen for this case study. The economy of Nepalese people is based on agriculture but, the management of cultivated land and used rural technology are highly traditional. In fact, more than 70% of the total population depends on subsistence farming. The Nepalese have strived hard in order to overcome the harsh physiographic environment and raise crops successfully. Lack of irrigation facility and depletion of water resources through the seepage to sub surface is one of the outstanding examples of battling the severe impediments to farming. The population of Nepal including the study area is increasing day by day and in order to meet the increasing demands of the growing population for food, fodder, timber, and fuel-wood, marginal lands are being cultivated. Consequently, many forest and shrub lands have been degraded and also destructed through encroachment. Farm lands in the hills and mountains are classified as upland (bari) and lowland (khet). Whereas, upland farms are rain-fed and planted with crops like maize, mustard, wheat, millet and buck-wheat. Lowland areas are usually irrigated and planted with paddy and mustard. 2. Objectives of the study The main objectives of this study are: to find the historical background of cultivation in the Chure region to trap the depleted water resources in river system as irrigation facility to find the importance of irrigation channel for the economic development of farmer. to study and analyze people's participation in irrigation system improvement. to manage the local resources properly with the sustainably and collaboratively. - 1 - 3. Site description Ratu is a boarder river, located between the Mahottari and Dhanusa district. The Community Development and Advocacy Forum Nepal is implementing the Community Based Disaster Risk Reduction (CBDRR) program under the cooperation of the Caritas Nepal/Germany in Ratu River System since 2013. All total, there are forty Village Development Committee (VDC) either falls the total or partial area in Ratu River System (RRS). The Gauribas VDC of the Mahottari district is located in the upstream of RRS towards the northern direction from the East-west highway. In this VDC, there is a small village namely Rajabas at the river terrace of Ratu River, which is the site of this case study. There are two river terraces in Rajbas; upper and lower whereas upper terraces have settlements and lower terrace falls under the cultivation as irrigated khet lands. The area of river terrace is flat, south facing and highly populated in between the Forest and RRS. Mulkulo is the irrigation facility of the lower terrace and command area of this channel is more than 60 hectare. The location of improved channel is shown in Figure 1, below. Figure-1: Location of Irrigation Channel Improvement with its Command Area in Ratu River System The climate of this village is sub-tropical and humid and marked by monsoon rainfall. The pre- monsoon period is generally hot and dry and sometimes there are hailstorms. The average annual rainfall is about 1500-2000 mm which occurs mainly from May to September. The mean peak temperature in July and August is 35.5°C and falls around 5°C in January. - 2 - The cropping patterns are greatly affected by soil, altitude, and irrigation. The main crops are paddy, maize, millet, and wheat in rain fed cultivation and Paddy, wheat, maize in lower terrace, but seasonal vegetables are also grown. Raising livestock is a major occupation as economic activity in the river system. In spite of the time involved in collecting fodder and looking after the livestock and other social costs, raising livestock is profitable. Livestock is also the main source of manure for improving soil fertility and draft power for ploughing. The total population of Rajabas village is 536, which belongs to the 270 female and 266 male within the 95 households of locality. But, the number of farmers as member of user group of the Irrigation System (Mulkulo) is 73 HH and dominated by ethnic groups and practicing religions in Hinduism and Buddhism. Due to economic, social and ecological pressures, the local people are forced to leave their villages for short and long-term employment. The lower castes often work as seasonally paid labors in the village. 4. Concept of Seepage Water Rising Background An irrigation channel is a waterway, often man-made or enhanced, built for the purpose of carrying water from a source such as a lake, river, or stream, to used for farming or landscaping. It can be dug into the ground and then filled with water, or an existing stream can be widened in a process called "canalization," and diverted as appropriate to provide maximum efficiency. The channel improvement for the rising of seepage water was constructed focusing to the irrigation purpose of lowland. At first, this concept was developed by the farmers themselves to fulfill the shortage of water to the purpose of irrigation in their farm. When they searched the water inside the river courses of Ratu River found to be high in the depth. Hence, there were no any perennial sources of water in the River and drying at the early of the winter season. But, the source of seepage water was found to be perennial in the sub surface even in the winter and dry season also. Therefore, the users Mulkulo in Rajabas village was trying to raise the water to the surface since long time. Water discharge in previous Rajabas is a river terrace with higher potentiality of crop production, but there was no any system of winter cultivation in the command area of Mulkulo even in lowland due to lack of irrigation facility. In another hand, the river flooding in monsoon season was common in the Ratu River. The major event of flood disaster in Ratu River were 2050, 2060 and 2061 whereas, these events were damaged a huge number of life and property of local people. After the flood event of 2061, Ratu River become very wide and the problem of yearly bed rising was started. Previously, there were many water sources around the Rajabas village even in the small torrents also. But, the remained source of water is only one at present. The remaining water sources are also arising at the end of August and drying soon after the winter. Water discharge at present They have enough water for the monsoon cultivation, but not enough water for the winter/dry cultivation before using latest technology for irrigation (seepage water raising system). Therefore, the farmers of the Mulkulo are arranging the individual turn for the irrigation. According to the farmers of Mulkulo, the main reason of water seepage in Ratu River are 1) deforestation with reduction of vegetation coverage in upstream, 2) sedimentation in river channel and its tributaries, 3) changing pattern of rainfall, 4) increasing ratio of runoff instead of infiltration to the sub surface etc. Based on the above circumstances, the technology of seepage water rising for the irrigation was developed by the farmer themselves through the - 3 - construction of deep channel in 2064. Later, the CDAFN a non-governmental organization (NGO) has developed a technology for the raising of seepage water through the irrigation channel improvement. Cropping pattern According to the water users group of the Mulkulo, the total volume of water in previous (before the seepage of water) and present (after the raise of seepage water) are similar, but the pattern of river flow (as surface and sub surface) became the differences. Previously, the crop cultivation was only one for the majority of lands and only few have two, but they are producing three crops after raising the seepage water at present.
Recommended publications
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of Dolakha District Show Ing Proposed Vdcs for Survey
    Annex 3.6 Annex 3.6 Map of Dolakha district showing proposed VDCs for survey Source: NARMA Inception Report A - 53 Annex 3.7 Annex 3.7 Summary of Periodic District Development Plans Outlay Districts Period Vision Objectives Priorities (Rs in 'ooo) Kavrepalanchok 2000/01- Protection of natural Qualitative change in social condition (i) Development of physical 7,021,441 2006/07 resources, health, of people in general and backward class infrastructure; education; (ii) Children education, agriculture (children, women, Dalit, neglected and and women; (iii) Agriculture; (iv) and tourism down trodden) and remote area people Natural heritage; (v) Health services; development in particular; Increase in agricultural (vi) Institutional development and and industrial production; Tourism and development management; (vii) infrastructure development; Proper Tourism; (viii) Industrial management and utilization of natural development; (ix) Development of resources. backward class and region; (x) Sports and culture Sindhuli Mahottari Ramechhap 2000/01 – Sustainable social, Integrated development in (i) Physical infrastructure (road, 2,131,888 2006/07 economic and socio-economic aspects; Overall electricity, communication), sustainable development of district by mobilizing alternative energy, residence and town development (Able, local resources; Development of human development, industry, mining and Prosperous and resources and information system; tourism; (ii) Education, culture and Civilized Capacity enhancement of local bodies sports; (III) Drinking
    [Show full text]
  • Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) of Hetauda-Dhalkebar-Duhabi 400 Kv and Dhalkebar-Bhittamod 400 Kv TL Project
    Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) of Hetauda-Dhalkebar-Duhabi 400 Public Disclosure Authorized kV And Dhalkebar-Bhittamod 400 kV TL Project (Angle Tower, Sub-stations and Structures) Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared And Submitted By: Public Disclosure Authorized Environment And Social Studies Department Engineering Services Nepal Electricity Authority Kharipati, Bhaktapur February, 2011 Public Disclosure Authorized Resettlemention Action Plan ABBREVIATIONS CBO Community Based Organization CDO Chief District Officer CDC Compensation Determination Committee CFUG Community Forest User Group DADO District Agriculture Development Office DDC District Development Committee DFO District Forest Office DHO District Health Office EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMF Electromagnetic Fields ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ESSD Environment and Social Studies Department FGD Focus Group Discussion GON Government of Nepal HEP Hydro Electric Project HH Household HDD~ESMU Hetauda-D.halkebar-Duhabi Environnent & Social Mgmt. Unit INPS Integrated Nepal Power System IPP Independent Power Producers IRPA International Radiation Protection Association KlIs Key Informant Interviews km Kilometer kV Kilovolt LCF Local Consultative Forum LDO Local Development Officer LARU Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation Unit NEA Nepal Electricity Authority NRs. Nepalese Rupees NGO Non Governmental Organization PAF Project Affected Family PAP Project Affected Person PCU Program Coordination Unit PRA Participatory Rapid Appraisal RAP Resettlement Action
    [Show full text]
  • VBST Short List
    1 आिेदकको दर्ा ा न륍बर नागररकर्ा न륍बर नाम थायी जि쥍ला गा.वि.स. बािुको नाम ईभेꅍट ID 10002 2632 SUMAN BHATTARAI KATHMANDU KATHMANDU M.N.P. KEDAR PRASAD BHATTARAI 136880 10003 28733 KABIN PRAJAPATI BHAKTAPUR BHAKTAPUR N.P. SITA RAM PRAJAPATI 136882 10008 271060/7240/5583 SUDESH MANANDHAR KATHMANDU KATHMANDU M.N.P. SHREE KRISHNA MANANDHAR 136890 10011 9135 SAMERRR NAKARMI KATHMANDU KATHMANDU M.N.P. BASANTA KUMAR NAKARMI 136943 10014 407/11592 NANI MAYA BASNET DOLAKHA BHIMESWOR N.P. SHREE YAGA BAHADUR BASNET136951 10015 62032/450 USHA ADHIJARI KAVRE PANCHKHAL BHOLA NATH ADHIKARI 136952 10017 411001/71853 MANASH THAPA GULMI TAMGHAS KASHER BAHADUR THAPA 136954 10018 44874 RAJ KUMAR LAMICHHANE PARBAT TILAHAR KRISHNA BAHADUR LAMICHHANE136957 10021 711034/173 KESHAB RAJ BHATTA BAJHANG BANJH JANAK LAL BHATTA 136964 10023 1581 MANDEEP SHRESTHA SIRAHA SIRAHA N.P. KUMAR MAN SHRESTHA 136969 2 आिेदकको दर्ा ा न륍बर नागररकर्ा न륍बर नाम थायी जि쥍ला गा.वि.स. बािुको नाम ईभेꅍट ID 10024 283027/3 SHREE KRISHNA GHARTI LALITPUR GODAWARI DURGA BAHADUR GHARTI 136971 10025 60-01-71-00189 CHANDRA KAMI JUMLA PATARASI JAYA LAL KAMI 136974 10026 151086/205 PRABIN YADAV DHANUSHA MARCHAIJHITAKAIYA JAYA NARAYAN YADAV 136976 10030 1012/81328 SABINA NAGARKOTI KATHMANDU DAANCHHI HARI KRISHNA NAGARKOTI 136984 10032 1039/16713 BIRENDRA PRASAD GUPTABARA KARAIYA SAMBHU SHA KANU 136988 10033 28-01-71-05846 SURESH JOSHI LALITPUR LALITPUR U.M.N.P. RAJU JOSHI 136990 10034 331071/6889 BIJAYA PRASAD YADAV BARA RAUWAHI RAM YAKWAL PRASAD YADAV 136993 10036 071024/932 DIPENDRA BHUJEL DHANKUTA TANKHUWA LOCHAN BAHADUR BHUJEL 136996 10037 28-01-067-01720 SABIN K.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal National Association of Rural Municipality Association of District Coordination (Muan) in Nepal (NARMIN) Committees of Nepal (ADCCN)
    Study Organized by Municipality Association of Nepal National Association of Rural Municipality Association of District Coordination (MuAN) in Nepal (NARMIN) Committees of Nepal (ADCCN) Supported by Sweden European Sverige Union "This document has been financed by the Swedish "This publication was produced with the financial support of International Development Cooperation Agency, Sida. Sida the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of does not necessarily share the views expressed in this MuAN, NARMIN, ADCCN and UCLG and do not necessarily material. Responsibility for its content rests entirely with the reflect the views of the European Union'; author." Publication Date June 2020 Study Organized by Municipality Association of Nepal (MuAN) National Association of Rural Municipality in Nepal (NARMIN) Association of District Coordination Committees of Nepal (ADCCN) Supported by Sweden Sverige European Union Expert Services Dr. Dileep K. Adhikary Editing service for the publication was contributed by; Mr Kalanidhi Devkota, Executive Director, MuAN Mr Bimal Pokheral, Executive Director, NARMIN Mr Krishna Chandra Neupane, Executive Secretary General, ADCCN Layout Designed and Supported by Edgardo Bilsky, UCLG world Dinesh Shrestha, IT Officer, ADCCN Table of Contents Acronyms ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Forewords .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 Pcr Test Report
    COVID-19 PCR TEST REPORT Total Sample Tested = 45050 Total New Sample Tested = 452 Reporting Date : 2078-02-14 New Positive Result = 203 Time: 9:50 AM New Negative Result = 249 S. No. Date Patient Id Name A/G Address District Contact Result 1 21/05/26 55157 20Y/M janakpur-21 Dhanusha Positive 2 21/05/26 55083 27Y/M Mithila-11 Dhanusha Positive 3 21/05/26 55246 Rupak Khadka 36Y/M bardibas-8 Mahottari Negative 4 21/05/26 55247 Hari Prasad Magar 22Y/M bardibas-8 Mahottari Negative 5 21/05/26 55248 Liza Karki 25Y/F bardibas-14 Mahottari Negative 6 21/05/26 55249 26Y/M bardibas-14 Mahottari Positive 7 21/05/26 55250 Sunil Thapa 24Y/M bardibas-3 Mahottari Negative 8 21/05/26 55251 34Y/M bardibas-14 Mahottari Positive 9 21/05/26 55252 48Y/M bardibas-3 Mahottari Positive 10 21/05/26 55253 Ramila Pokharel 28Y/F bardibas-1 Mahottari Negative 11 21/05/26 55254 Bijesh Sah 31Y/M bardibas-14 Mahottari Negative 12 21/05/26 55255 28Y/F bardibas-14 Mahottari Positive 13 21/05/26 55256 12Y/F bardibas-14 Mahottari Positive 14 21/05/26 55257 46Y/M bardibas-14 Mahottari Positive 15 21/05/26 55258 Saroj Kumar Adhikari 31Y/M bardibas-2 Mahottari Negative 16 21/05/26 55259 Radha Devkota 20Y/F bardibas-2 Mahottari Negative 17 21/05/26 55260 Dr ishwar Pokharel 31Y/M bardibas-1 Mahottari Negative 18 21/05/26 55261 28Y/F lalgadh-10 Dhanusha Positive 19 21/05/26 55262 28Y/M bardibas-4 Mahottari Positive 20 21/05/26 55263 Sarita Pandit 42Y/F bardibas-1 Mahottari Negative 21 21/05/26 55264 Anand Sunuwar 30Y/M lalgadh-10 Dhanusha Negative 22 21/05/26 55265 Gopal B.k
    [Show full text]
  • School Governance and Accountability Situation: A
    HAMRO SHIKSHYA PROJECT School Governance and Accountability Situation: A Comprehensive Assessment of Dhanusha, Mahottari and Siraha Districts Final Report NATIONAL CAMPAIGN FOR EDUCATION NEPAL December, 2016 Research Team Dr. Megh Raj Dangal (Team Leader) Mr. Rebat Kumar Dhakal (Research Coordinator) Mr. Kul Prasad Khanal (Researcher) Ms. Rupa Munakarmi (Researcher) Acknowledgements This study has been possible with the support and contribution of a large number of people. The study team gratefully acknowledges the support and help of all those who contributed to the study. We would like to express our special gratitude and thanks to National Campaign for Education Nepal (NCE-Nepal), Search for Common Ground and GoGo Foundation for their trust in us and for the opportunity given to us in conducting and reporting this study. Particularly, we are grateful to Dr. Bhola Prasad Dahal and Mr. Ram Gaire for providing us with necessary guidelines and support during the entire period of this research. Our thanks and appreciations also go to Mr. Salikram Kalathoki and Ms. Reeza Shrestha who helped in reaching the field and meeting with the local project staffs, who in turn, supported us in accessing the gatekeepers and participants as well as providing us with timely support. Further, we would like to thank the entire team of GoGo Foundation. We heartily acknowledge Mr. Alok Thakur's, regional representative from Search for Common Ground, help in providing us with all the important information and documents during consultation meetings and interviews. The District Education Officials in Dhanusha, Mahottari and Siraha also deserve our sincere thanks. Finally, we thank all the participants for their active participation and sharing useful information with us.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Cover Map of Province 2, Nepal 84°30'0"E 85°0'0"E 85°30'0"E 86°0'0"E 86°30'0"E 87°0'0"E ± India
    FOREST COVER MAP OF PROVINCE 2, NEPAL 84°30'0"E 85°0'0"E 85°30'0"E 86°0'0"E 86°30'0"E 87°0'0"E ± INDIA Province-7 Province-6 CHINA µ Province-4 Province-5 Province-3 INDIA Province-1 Province-2 INDIA N N " " 0 0 ' ' 0 0 3 3 ° ° 7 7 2 District Forest ('000 Ha) Forest (%) Other Land ('000 Ha) Other Land (%) 2 Bara 46.63 36.64 80.64 63.36 Dhanusha 27.15 22.84 91.70 77.16 Chitwan Mahottari 22.24 22.23 77.81 77.77 National Parsa 76.23 54.19 64.45 45.81 Park Parsa Rautahat 26.29 25.32 77.53 74.68 Wildlife Reserve Parsa Saptari 21.14 16.50 106.95 83.50 Subarnapur Wildlife Sarlahi 25.77 20.40 100.55 79.60 Reserve PROVINCE 3 Siraha 18.19 15.97 95.70 84.03 PARSA S K h Total 263.63 27.49 695.34 72.51 a h k o t la i Nijgadh Jitpur Paterwasugauli Simara a h i a d s a a N Parsagadhi P B SakhuwaPrasauni a i N k Chandrapur a n Jagarnathpur a a i d y y a a a l i o D h K Lalbandi Belwa Kolhabi e i hi Dhobini b d a a a d l n i Hariwan a N BARA h T ndhi ak ola Lokha L Kh Bahudaramai Khola Pokhariya RAUTAHAT Bagmati Parwanipur Bardibas Chhipaharmai Gujara Pakahamainpur Bindabasini Karaiyamai Phatuwa r tu Birgunj injo a i Kal d Bijayapur R a Kalaiya ola N im Kh N h la N " Prasauni J o " 0 Haripur h 0 ' K ' 0 Katahariya Birndaban 0 ° Baragadhi ° 7 Mithila 7 2 Pheta a i 2 iy n Ishworpur a i Barahathawa a im k a h Mahagadhimai d p l J a i a a o d B a N l h h N a C K S L e K la ho r la Garuda Gaushala o Ganeshman Adarshkotwal Gadhimai t i Devtal Dewahhi d K Maulapur Kabilasi a a a Chandranagar a l m R Charnath a a N i la Gonahi m d N SARLAHI a a a Ka K N di ma
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Province 02, Preliminary Results, Nepal Economic Census
    Number of Number of Persons Engaged District and Local Unit establishments Total Male Female Saptari District 16,292 44,341 28,112 16,229 20101SAPTAKOSHI MUNICIPALITY 940 1,758 1,248 510 20102KANCHANRUP MUNICIPALITY 1,335 3,157 2,135 1,022 20103 AGMISAIR KRISHNA SABARAN RURAL MUNICIPALITY 774 2,261 1,255 1,006 20104RUPANI RURAL MUNICIPALITY 552 2,184 1,319 865 20105SHAMBHUNATH MUNICIPALITY 960 1,844 1,093 751 20106KHADAK MUNICIPALITY 1,124 5,083 2,808 2,275 20107SURUNGA MUNICIPALITY 1,264 5,462 3,094 2,368 20108 BALAN-BIHUL RURAL MUNICIPALITY 433 1,048 720 328 20109BODE BARSAIN MUNICIPALITY 1,013 2,598 1,801 797 20110DAKNESHWORI MUNICIPALITY 949 2,171 1,456 715 20111 BELHI CHAPENA RURAL MUNICIPALITY 615 999 751 248 20112 BISHNUPUR RURAL MUNICIPALITY 406 766 460 306 20113RAJBIRAJ MUNICIPALITY 2,485 7,116 4,507 2,609 20114 MAHADEWA RURAL MUNICIPALITY 593 1,213 855 358 20115TIRAHUT RURAL MUNICIPALITY 614 1,207 828 379 20116 HANUMANNAGAR KANKALINI MUNICIPALITY 1,143 2,836 1,911 925 20117TILATHI KOILADI RURAL MUNICIPALITY 561 1,462 1,011 451 20118 CHHINNAMASTA RURAL MUNICIPALITY 531 1,176 860 316 Siraha District 13,163 43,902 28,989 14,913 20201LAHAN MUNICIPALITY 2,127 6,201 4,244 1,957 20202DHANGADHIMAI MUNICIPALITY 931 2,268 1,535 733 20203GOLBAZAR MUNICIPALITY 1,293 7,687 5,120 2,567 20204MIRCHAIYA MUNICIPALITY 1,567 5,322 2,559 2,763 20205KARJANHA MUNICIPALITY 551 1,230 802 428 20206KALYANPUR MUNICIPALITY 799 1,717 1,064 653 20207 NARAHA RURAL MUNICIPALITY 390 1,390 1,038 352 20208 BISHNUPUR RURAL MUNICIPALITY 599 1,236 915 321 20209 ARNAMA
    [Show full text]
  • The Monsoon Started from the 10 July, 2007 and Unrelenting Precipitation to Date Has Set Off Flood and Landslide in 36 Districts the Country
    Nepal Red Cross Society Flood and Land slide information bulletin No: 24-08082007 General Information: The monsoon started from the 10 July, 2007 and unrelenting precipitation to date has set off flood and landslide in 36 Districts the country. Some Districts are lightly affected claiming few lives (see statistics for details). Flood has affected Far Western District; Kailali , Mid Western Districts; Bankey, Bardiya and Dang , Western District; Nawalprasi and Rupendhei Eastern Districts; Sunsari, Morang Jhapa and Udayapur and Central Terai Districts; Rauthat , Bara , Parsa , siraha , Sarlahi , Saptari , Mohhatari , Dhanusa , Rauthat Whilst , Landslide has affected Baglung , Dolkha , Jajarkot , Puythan , Ramechhap, Saynga, surkhet, Dolakha, Dadeldhura, Shankhuwashaba, Dang, Surkhet, Gulmi, Parbat, Khotang, Dhading, Panchthar and Bajura Districts. Preliminary assessment carried out by NRCS DC has recognized that 96 people have died; displaced families are 20, 816 and over 56, 192 families have been affected, 2 is still missing and 55 are injured. Total 337, 241 people reportedly affected through the country . 22, 248 houses are partially and 15, 819 houses are completely destroyed. The assessment has highlighted immediate shelter, clean drinking water and food needs. Health issues appeared in five districts; Rauthaut , Dhanusa , Bardiya , Banke and Kailali and potential to appear in other affected district, if logging continued for more days. NRCS DCs have mobilized staffs and volunteers teams for assessment and relief operation and detail assessment is being carried out by District Chapters. NRCS DCs has provided food to over 23,975 families, covering estimated 143, 850 individuals and NFRI to 4992 (including 4670 families receiving NFRI kits and 250 families receiving clothes and other items) families.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Based Flood and Glacial Lake Outburst Risk Reduction Project (CFGORRP) PIMS #4657 (GEF ID 4551)
    FINAL REPORT Community Based Flood and Glacial Lake Outburst Risk Reduction Project (CFGORRP) PIMS #4657 (GEF ID 4551) March 2018 Nepal Prepared for UNDP Nepal Prepared by Tonkin & Taylor Ltd Date Job Number Evaluation Team Bapon Fakhruddin, PhD Govinda Basnet, PhD Document Control Title: Date Version Description Prepared by: Reviewed Authorised by: by: 18/12/17 Draft Draft Final Report Bapon Govinda Bapon Fakhruddin Basnet Fakhruddin 18/03/18 Final Final Report Govinda Bapon Bapon Basnet Fakhruddin Fakhruddin Distribution: UNDP Nepal copies Table of contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of the Evaluation 1 1.2 Scope and Methodology 2 1.3 Structure of the evaluation report 5 2 Project description and development context 5 2.1 Project start and duration 7 2.2 Problems the project sought to address 7 2.2.1 Technical and management challenges 8 2.2.2 Financial Challenges 8 2.3 Immediate and development objectives of the project 9 2.4 Baseline Indicators Established 9 2.5 Main stakeholders 10 2.6 Expected Results 12 2.7 Project Working Area 12 3 Findings 13 3.1 Project Design / Formulation 13 3.1.1 Analysis of LFA/Results Framework (Project logic/strategy; Indicators) 14 3.1.2 Assumptions and Risks 1 3.1.3 Lessons from other relevant projects (e.g., same focal area) incorporated into project design 1 3.1.4 Planned stakeholder participation 1 3.1.5 Replication approach 3 3.1.6 UNDP’s comparative advantage 3 3.1.7 Linkages between project and other interventions within the sector 3 3.1.8 Management arrangements 4 3.2 Project Implementation
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Assesment of Forest Fire Distribution, Occurrence and Dynamics in Province-2, Nepal
    Research Article ISSN: 2574 -1241 DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2021.35.005666 Spatial Assesment of Forest Fire Distribution, Occurrence and Dynamics in Province-2, Nepal Dipika Badal1 and Ram Asheshwar Mandal2* 1Kathmandu Forestry College, Nepal 2School of Environment Science and Management, Nepal *Corresponding author: Ram Asheshwar Mandal, School of Environment Science and Management, Kathmandu, Nepal ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Received: April 06, 2021 burnt area and its causes and management measures in Province-2, Nepal. Altogether Published: April 20, 2021 48 QuestionnaireThis study was Survey objectively and 32 conducted Key Informant to assess Interviews trends wereof forest organized fire occurrence, to collect primary data while secondary data were collected from Fire Information for Resource Management System from year, 2002 to 2019. Total 36 maps were produced showing Citation: Mandal. Spatial Assesment of Forest Fire Distribution, Dipika Occurrence Badal, andRam Dynamics Asheshwar in fire occurrences (18) and burnt area pattern (18) of targeted area. Result showed that Province-2, Nepal. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res coveringtotal 5289 56.24%. forest fireThe incidents highest incidence and total was 499,538.9 recorded ha inwere Lower burnt Tropical from 2002Sal and to Mixed2019. The highest number of forest fire incidents was observed in March with 2975 incidents 35(2)-2021.Keywords: MODIS;BJSTR. MS.ID.005666.Fire Incidence; Burnt Broadleaf Forest with 3237 observations. One-Way ANOVA showed that fire occurrence Area; People Perceptions; Fire Manage- and burnt area among Lower Tropical Sal and Mixed Broadleaf Forest (LTSMF), Hill ment Sal Forest (HSF) and Outside Forest Region (OFR) were significantly different at 95% confidence level.
    [Show full text]