DOCSLIB.ORG

School Governance and Accountability Situation: A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
School Governance and Accountability Situation: A HAMRO SHIKSHYA PROJECT School Governance and Accountability Situation: A Comprehensive Assessment of Dhanusha, Mahottari and Siraha Districts Final Report NATIONAL CAMPAIGN FOR EDUCATION NEPAL December, 2016 Research Team Dr. Megh Raj Dangal (Team Leader) Mr. Rebat Kumar Dhakal (Research Coordinator) Mr. Kul Prasad Khanal (Researcher) Ms. Rupa Munakarmi (Researcher) Acknowledgements This study has been possible with the support and contribution of a large number of people. The study team gratefully acknowledges the support and help of all those who contributed to the study. We would like to express our special gratitude and thanks to National Campaign for Education Nepal (NCE-Nepal), Search for Common Ground and GoGo Foundation for their trust in us and for the opportunity given to us in conducting and reporting this study. Particularly, we are grateful to Dr. Bhola Prasad Dahal and Mr. Ram Gaire for providing us with necessary guidelines and support during the entire period of this research. Our thanks and appreciations also go to Mr. Salikram Kalathoki and Ms. Reeza Shrestha who helped in reaching the field and meeting with the local project staffs, who in turn, supported us in accessing the gatekeepers and participants as well as providing us with timely support. Further, we would like to thank the entire team of GoGo Foundation. We heartily acknowledge Mr. Alok Thakur's, regional representative from Search for Common Ground, help in providing us with all the important information and documents during consultation meetings and interviews. The District Education Officials in Dhanusha, Mahottari and Siraha also deserve our sincere thanks. Finally, we thank all the participants for their active participation and sharing useful information with us. Research Team Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 Section I ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Background and Context................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose of the Study ..................................................................................................................... 5 Scope and Limitations................................................................................................................... 5 Relevance and Rationale ............................................................................................................... 5 Beneficiaries ................................................................................................................................. 5 Section II ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Brief Introduction to the Target Districts.......................................................................................... 6 Dhanusha....................................................................................................................................... 6 Mahottari ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Siraha ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Status Updates ............................................................................................................................... 7 Section III.......................................................................................................................................... 9 School Governance in Nepal: Policy Review ................................................................................... 9 School Governance Mechanisms .................................................................................................. 9 School Governance Provisions in Education Policy Documents ............................................... 11 Current Situation, Gaps and Issues to Be Addressed .................................................................. 12 Section IV ....................................................................................................................................... 14 Methodology of the Study .............................................................................................................. 14 Section V ......................................................................................................................................... 15 Findings and Discussion ................................................................................................................. 15 Current Situation of School Governance and Accountability ..................................................... 15 School Governance Scenario .................................................................................................. 15 Accountability and Transparency of SMC, PTA and HT ....................................................... 16 Use of Social Accountability Tools in Schools ...................................................................... 18 Head Teacher Leadership ....................................................................................................... 18 Teacher Regularity and Service Delivery ............................................................................... 19 Child Club Functionality......................................................................................................... 19 Comparative Chart: Dhanusha, Mahottari and Siraha ........................................................... 20 Mapping of Education Stakeholders ........................................................................................... 23 Challenges of School Governance and Accountability .............................................................. 27 Gap Between Policies and Practices ........................................................................................... 28 Section VI ....................................................................................................................................... 30 Conclusion and Recommendations ................................................................................................. 30 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 30 Recommendations ....................................................................................................................... 30 Strategic Project Interventions .................................................................................................... 33 References ....................................................................................................................................... 34 Annex A: Thematic Guidelines .................................................................................................. 36 Annex B: Guidelines for District Level Stakeholder Consultation ............................................ 39 Annex C: Interview/FGD Guidelines ......................................................................................... 40 Annex D: Sampling Frame of the Study ..................................................................................... 42 Annex E: Key Techniques Applied for Data Collect .................................................................. 43 Annex F: School Observation Checklist ..................................................................................... 44 Annex G: Comparative Chart on the Status of Education .......................................................... 46 Annex H: Supplementary Data Sheets ........................................................................................ 48 Abbreviations CAS Continuous Assessment System CBO Community Based Organization CBS Central Bureau of Statistics CSO Civil Society Organization DDC District Development Committee DEO District Education Office DEP District Education Plan DoE Department of Education ECED Early Childhood Education Development EMIS Educational Management and Information System ERO Education Review Office FGD Focus Group Discussion GATE Girls’ Access to Education GER Gross Enrolment Ratio GoGo Foundation Good Governance Foundation HT Head Teachers I/NGO International/Non-Governmental Organization MoE Ministry of Education NASA National Assessment of Student Achievement NCE-Nepal National Campaign for Education-Nepal PCF Per Child Funding PPE Pre-Primary Education PTA Parent Teacher Association RC Resource Center RP Resource Person SBM School-Based Management SFCG Search for Common Ground SIP School Improvement Plan SLC School Leaving Certificate SMC School Management Committee SS School Supervisor SSDP School Sector Development Plan SSRP School Sector Reform Program T-P-S Teacher-Parent-Student UNICEF United Nations Children's Fund UNRCHCO UN Resident Coordinator and Humanitarian Coordinator Office VDC Village Development Committee VEP Village Education Plan Executive Summary Background: School governance and accountability discussion is on the rise across the globe, and it has remained a critical challenge in Nepal as well. In this backdrop, the need of some kind of intervention and support are felt
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Provincial Public Health Laboratory Janakpurdham, Province-2 Covid 19 Pcr Test Report
    PROVINCIAL PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY JANAKPURDHAM, PROVINCE-2 COVID 19 PCR TEST REPORT Total New Sample Tested =368 Reporting Date : 2078-01-27 Positive Result =221 Time: 11:25 AM Negative Result =147 S. No. Date Patient Id Name A/G Address District Contact Result 1 21/05/08 46783 50Y/M mithila-10 Dhanusha Positive 2 21/05/08 46784 46Y/M bardibas-01 Mahottari Positive 3 21/05/08 46785 17Y/M bardibas-01 Mahottari Positive 4 21/05/08 46786 50Y/M bardibas-01 Mahottari Positive 5 21/05/08 46787 21Y/F bardibas-01 Mahottari Positive 6 21/05/08 46788 59Y/M mithila-03 Dhanusha Positive 7 21/05/08 46789 25Y/M BARDIBAS-5 Mahottari Positive 8 21/05/08 46791 Gauri Shankar Chaudhary 27Y/M bardibas Mahottari Negative 9 21/05/08 46792 Nakul Sedai 27Y/M bardibas Mahottari Negative 10 21/05/08 46793 Rama Pandit 26Y/M baedibas-8 Mahottari Negative 11 21/05/08 46794 Riyan Sedai 20Y/M bardibas-8 Mahottari Negative 12 21/05/08 46795 Rakesh Yadav 37Y/M bardibas-4 Mahottari Negative 13 21/05/08 46796 Nirmala Bhujel 23Y/F bardibas-5 Mahottari Negative 14 21/05/08 46797 34Y/M BARDIBAS-2 Mahottari Positive 15 21/05/08 46798 Samichari Devi Mahato 32Y/F BARDIBAS-2 Mahottari Negative 16 21/05/08 46799 51Y/M BARDIBAS-2 Mahottari Positive 17 21/05/08 46800 51Y/F BARDIBAS-2 Mahottari Positive 18 21/05/08 46801 49Y/M BARDIBAS-1 Mahottari Positive 19 21/05/08 46802 20Y/M BARDIBAS-5 Mahottari Positive 20 21/05/08 46803 45Y/M BARDIBAS-3 Mahottari Positive 21 21/05/08 46804 29Y/M BARDIBAS-24 Mahottari Positive 22 21/05/08 46805 25Y/ BARDIBAS Mahottari Positive 23 21/05/08
    [Show full text]
  • Final Evaluation Combating Exploitive Child Labor Through Education in Nepal: Naya Bato Naya Paila Project -New Path New Steps
    FINAL (AFTER COMMENTS) Independent Final Evaluation Combating Exploitive Child Labor through Education in Nepal: Naya Bato Naya Paila Project -New Path New Steps- USDOL Cooperative Agreement No: IL-19513-09-75-K Report prepared by: Dr. Martina Nicolls April 2013 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................ v LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................... vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 1 Country Context ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Relevance: Shifting Project Priorities ................................................................................................................... 1 Effectiveness ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Efficiency .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Impact .................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Sustainability .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal
    FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF NEPAL MINISTRY OF IRRIGATION MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF NEPAL NEPAL AGRICULTURE RESEARCH COUNCIL MINISTRY OF IRRIGATION MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT NEPAL AGRICULTUREPREPARATORY RESEARCH SURVEY COUNCIL ON JICA'S COOPERATION PROGRAM FOR AGRICULTUREPREPARATORY AND RURAL SURVEY DEVELOPMENT IN NEPALON JICA'S COOPERATION PROGRAM - FOODFOR AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION ANDAND AGRICULTURERURAL DEVELOPMENT IN TERAI - IN NEPAL - FOOD PRODUCTION AND AGRICULTURE IN TERAI - FINAL REPORT MAIN REPORT FINAL REPORT MAIN REPORT OCTOBER 2013 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY OCTOBER(JICA) 2013 JAPAN INTERNATIONALNIPPON KOEI COOPERATION CO., LTD. AGENCY VISION AND SPIRIT(JICA) FOR OVERSEAS COOPERATION (VSOC) CO., LTD. NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. C.D.C. INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION VISION AND SPIRIT FOR OVERSEAS COOPERATION (VSOC) CO., LTD. 4R C.D.C. INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION JR 13 - 031 FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF NEPAL MINISTRY OF IRRIGATION MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF NEPAL NEPAL AGRICULTURE RESEARCH COUNCIL MINISTRY OF IRRIGATION MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT NEPAL AGRICULTUREPREPARATORY RESEARCH SURVEY COUNCIL ON JICA'S COOPERATION PROGRAM FOR AGRICULTUREPREPARATORY AND RURAL SURVEY DEVELOPMENT IN NEPALON JICA'S COOPERATION PROGRAM - FOODFOR AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION ANDAND AGRICULTURERURAL DEVELOPMENT IN TERAI - IN NEPAL - FOOD PRODUCTION AND AGRICULTURE IN TERAI - FINAL REPORT MAIN REPORT FINAL REPORT MAIN REPORT OCTOBER 2013 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Environment Nepal
    Government of Nepal Ministry of Forests and Environment Nepal Forests for Prosperity Project Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) March 8, 2020 Executive Summary 1. This Environment and Social Management Framework (ESMF) has been prepared for the Forests for Prosperity (FFP) Project. The Project is implemented by the Ministry of Forest and Environment and funded by the World Bank as part of the Nepal’s Forest Investment Plan under the Forest Investment Program. The purpose of the Environmental and Social Management Framework is to provide guidance and procedures for screening and identification of expected environmental and social risks and impacts, developing management and monitoring plans to address the risks and to formulate institutional arrangements for managing these environmental and social risks under the project. 2. The Project Development Objective (PDO) is to improve sustainable forest management1; increase benefits from forests and contribute to net Greenhouse Gas Emission (GHG) reductions in selected municipalities in provinces 2 and 5 in Nepal. The short-to medium-term outcomes are expected to increase overall forest productivity and the forest sector’s contribution to Nepal’s economic growth and sustainable development including improved incomes and job creation in rural areas and lead to reduced Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions and increased climate resilience. This will directly benefit the communities, including women and disadvantaged groups participating in Community Based Forest Management (CBFM) as well and small and medium sized entrepreneurs (and their employees) involved in forest product harvesting, sale, transport and processing. Indirect benefits are improved forest cover, environmental services and carbon capture and storage 3. The FFP Project will increase the forest area under sustainable, community-based and productive forest management and under private smallholder plantations (mainly in the Terai), resulting in increased production of wood and non-wood forest products.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case from Lamabagar Village of Middle Nepal
    102 NJ: NUTA Biodiversity Resources and Livelihoods: A Case from Lamabagar Village of Middle Nepal Uttam Sagar Shrestha Lecturer, Padhma Kanya Campus Bagbazar, Kathmandu Email for correspondence: [email protected] Abstract The biodiversity resources are integral part of the livelihoods of residents of Lamabagar Village Development Committee. Over the last three decades, the number of species has been decreasing due to infrastructure developments- roads, hydropower’s. Reportedly, 277 species of plants 24 species of mammals and 37 species of birds were recorded in 2003 has come down to 244 species of plants, 20 species of mammals and 32 species of birds only in the present study. It has led mis-balance between biodiversity conservation and livelihood strategy. The present paper tries to discuss on overview of plant and animal diversity between 2003-2012, common relationship between bio-diversity resources and their implication in the livelihood, conservation issues and their threats. The findings of the work are based on the fieldwork carried out field survey between 2003 and 2012. Key words: Biodiversity, development interventions, plant species, mammals and agriculture. Introduction Biological Diversity in Nepal is closely linked to livelihoods of many people and their economic development, and touches upon agricultural productivity and sustainability, human health and nutrition, indigenous knowledge, gender equity, building materials, climate, water resources and aesthetic and cultural well being of the society (MOFSC, 2002). Therefore, in addition to terrestrial biodiversity, it also covers marine and other aquatic biodiversity as well. As such, biodiversity means richness and variety of living things in the world as a whole or any location within it.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Evaluation of Remittances: a Case Study of Dhanusha District
    Impact Evaluation of Remittances: A Case Study of Dhanusha District Nepal Rastra Bank Banking Development and Research Unit Janakpur July, 2012 July, 2012 Impact Evaluation of Remittances: A Case Study of Dhanusha District Contents List of Tables................................................................................................................................. iii List of Figures................................................................................................................................ iv Dhanusha District: Facts ................................................................................................................ v List of Abbreviations .....................................................................................................................vi Foreword .......................................................................................................................................vii Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... viii Chapter 1: Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 Chapter 2: Literature Review .......................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 3: Research Methodology and Survey Design................................................................... 8 Chapter 4: Results and Discussion .................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal National Association of Rural Municipality Association of District Coordination (Muan) in Nepal (NARMIN) Committees of Nepal (ADCCN)
    Study Organized by Municipality Association of Nepal National Association of Rural Municipality Association of District Coordination (MuAN) in Nepal (NARMIN) Committees of Nepal (ADCCN) Supported by Sweden European Sverige Union "This document has been financed by the Swedish "This publication was produced with the financial support of International Development Cooperation Agency, Sida. Sida the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of does not necessarily share the views expressed in this MuAN, NARMIN, ADCCN and UCLG and do not necessarily material. Responsibility for its content rests entirely with the reflect the views of the European Union'; author." Publication Date June 2020 Study Organized by Municipality Association of Nepal (MuAN) National Association of Rural Municipality in Nepal (NARMIN) Association of District Coordination Committees of Nepal (ADCCN) Supported by Sweden Sverige European Union Expert Services Dr. Dileep K. Adhikary Editing service for the publication was contributed by; Mr Kalanidhi Devkota, Executive Director, MuAN Mr Bimal Pokheral, Executive Director, NARMIN Mr Krishna Chandra Neupane, Executive Secretary General, ADCCN Layout Designed and Supported by Edgardo Bilsky, UCLG world Dinesh Shrestha, IT Officer, ADCCN Table of Contents Acronyms ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Forewords .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ZSL National Red List of Nepal's Birds Volume 5
    The Status of Nepal's Birds: The National Red List Series Volume 5 Published by: The Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK Copyright: ©Zoological Society of London and Contributors 2016. All Rights reserved. The use and reproduction of any part of this publication is welcomed for non-commercial purposes only, provided that the source is acknowledged. ISBN: 978-0-900881-75-6 Citation: Inskipp C., Baral H. S., Phuyal S., Bhatt T. R., Khatiwada M., Inskipp, T, Khatiwada A., Gurung S., Singh P. B., Murray L., Poudyal L. and Amin R. (2016) The status of Nepal's Birds: The national red list series. Zoological Society of London, UK. Keywords: Nepal, biodiversity, threatened species, conservation, birds, Red List. Front Cover Back Cover Otus bakkamoena Aceros nipalensis A pair of Collared Scops Owls; owls are A pair of Rufous-necked Hornbills; species highly threatened especially by persecution Hodgson first described for science Raj Man Singh / Brian Hodgson and sadly now extinct in Nepal. Raj Man Singh / Brian Hodgson The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of participating organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of any participating organizations. Notes on front and back cover design: The watercolours reproduced on the covers and within this book are taken from the notebooks of Brian Houghton Hodgson (1800-1894).
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource, Market Demand and Target Group Analysis of Siraha District-Development Management Institute
    Published by: Micro-Enterprise Development Programme Ministry of Industry United Nations Development Programme June 2013 Copyright © 2013 Micro-Enterprise Development Programme (MEDEP)/UNDP All rights are reserved. No part of this edited volume may be reproduced by any means, nor transmitted, nor translated into a machine language without the written permission of the publisher. ISBN: 978-99946-916-6-1 Printed in Nepal at : Office Support Service Centre Chhapakhana P. Ltd. Teku, Kathmandu Tel.: 4240571 Email.: [email protected] Natural Resource, Market Demand and Target Group Analysis of Siraha District1 Abstract MEDEP was piloted in 1998. It expanded to 36 districts by 2010 in its third phase (2008-13). The development objective of the programme was to contribute to reduce poverty among low-income families in rural areas, and to ensure the institutional development and capacity building of local service delivery organizations to work as catalysts in the development of rural micro-enterprise sector. In order to reach its target group, MEDEP conducts natural resource, market demand and target group surveys in the new programme districts. As Siraha was added as a new programme district in the third phase, this study was conducted to furnish these information. On the basis of the major findings, this study concluded that Siraha district has a high potential of developing micro- enterprises to create employment and income-generating opportunities for the MEDEP's target groups. For implementation effectiveness and better results, MEDEP should concentrate its programme on 32 new VDCs clustered around six market centres. Entrepreneurs should be supported in marketing skill development, market survey and marketing.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal: Community -Managed Irrigated Agricultural Sector Project Bachharaja Irrigation Subproject, Dhanusha District
    Initial Environmental Examination Document Project Number: 33209-01 June 2009 Nepal: Community -Managed Irrigated Agricultural Sector Project Bachharaja Irrigation Subproject, Dhanusha District Project Proponent: Department of Irrigation Prepared by Central Irrigation Development Division No. 1 (Mahottari) This Initial Environmental Examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. 1 ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank ADP - Agricultural Development Plan CMIASP - Community-Managed Irrigated Agricultural Sector Project CPMO - Center Project Management Office DADO - District Agriculture Development Office DB - Design Branch DDC - District Development Committee DOI - Department of Irrigation EB - Environment Branch EMP - Environmental Monitoring Plan FMIS - Farmer-managed irrigation systems ha - Hectare IDD - Irrigation Development Division IDSD - Irrigation Development Sub-division IEE - Initial Environmental Examination IPM - Integrated Pest Management ISPM - Institutional Strengthening and Project Management km - Kilo Meter LEP Livelihood Enhancement Plan lps - Liter Per Second MEQCB - Monitoring, Evaluation, and Quality Control Branch MoEST - Ministry of Environment, Science and Technology NGO - Non Governmental Organization O&M - Operation and Maintenance PDMED - Planning, Design, Monitoring and Evaluation Division RCC - Reinforce Concrete Cement Rs. - Rupees SISP - Second Irrigation Sector Project SWD - Surface Water Division VDC - Village Development Committee VRB - Village Road Bridge WECS - Water Energy Commission Secretariat WUA - Water User’s Association ZoI - Zone of Influence WEIGHTS AND MEASURES ha - hectare km - kilometer l - liter m - meter mo - month s - second t - ton yr - year CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 31 March 2009) Currency Unit - Nepalese Rupee (NR) NR 1.00 = $0.01226 $1.00 = NRs 81.54 NOTE In this report, “$” refers to US Dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Psychological Distress Among Mothers in Rural Nepal: A
    Clarke et al. BMC Psychiatry 2014, 14:60 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/14/60 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Understanding psychological distress among mothers in rural Nepal: a qualitative grounded theory exploration Kelly Clarke1*, Naomi Saville1, Bishnu Bhandari2, Kalpana Giri2, Mamita Ghising2, Meena Jha3, Sonali Jha2, Jananee Magar4, Rinku Roy2, Bhim Shrestha2, Bhawana Thakur2, Rinku Tiwari2, Anthony Costello1, Dharma Manandhar2, Michael King5, David Osrin1 and Audrey Prost1 Abstract Background: There is a large burden of psychological distress in low and middle-income countries, and culturally relevant interventions must be developed to address it. This requires an understanding of how distress is experienced. We conducted a qualitative grounded theory study to understand how mothers experience and manage distress in Dhanusha, a low-resource setting in rural Nepal. We also explored how distressed mothers interact with their families and the wider community. Methods: Participants were identified during a cluster-randomised controlled trial in which mothers were screened for psychological distress using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). We conducted 22 semi-structured interviews with distressed mothers (GHQ-12 score ≥5) and one with a traditional healer (dhami), as well as 12 focus group discussions with community members. Data were analysed using grounded theory methods and a model was developed to explain psychological distress in this setting. Results: We found that distress was termed tension by participants and mainly described in terms of physical symptoms. Key perceived causes of distress were poor health, lack of sons, and fertility problems. Tension developed in a context of limited autonomy for women and perceived duty towards the family.
    [Show full text]