Human Rights Annual Report 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Human Rights Annual Report 2015 HUMAN RIGHTS ANNUAL REPORT 2015 Monitoring the compliance of the Police Service of Northern Ireland with the Human Rights Act 1998. Foreword I am pleased to present the Northern Ireland Policing Board’s (the Policing Board’s) 11th Human Rights Annual Report. The Policing Board is required by section 3(3)(b)(ii) of the Police (Northern Ireland) Act 2000 to monitor the performance of the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) in complying with the Human Rights Act 1998. In order to assist it with fulfilling this duty, the Policing Board appointed Human Rights Advisors in 2003 to devise a framework detailing the standards against which the performance of the police in complying with the Human Rights Act 1998 would be monitored. The Policing Board’s Performance Committee, with the assistance of the Human Rights Advisor, is responsible for implementing the monitoring framework. This work has been reported upon by way of a Human Rights Annual Report every year since 2005. The implementation of human rights standards and principles is central to good policing and should be pivotal to everything that PSNI do. It helps to preserve public confidence in the PSNI which is paramount in securing its legitimacy. Ultimately it is the public who provide the police with their legitimacy and it is their acceptance of the legitimacy of the police that gives them their authority. This fundamental tenet lies at the heart of the work which the Policing Board, assisted by the Human Rights Advisor, carries out in monitoring and reporting upon the PSNI’s compliance with the Human Rights Act 1998. The Policing Board’s Human Rights Annual Report reports on performance of the PSNI in its compliance with the Human Rights Act 1998. In this respect it is a reflection of the work undertaken by the Policing Board, particularly through the Performance Committee, in holding PSNI to account and is an open and public commentary on police performance and of the Policing Board’s monitoring work. The Policing Board’s human rights monitoring work has been recognised as good practice in other parts of the United Kingdom and Ireland, with police services and government officials from other countries frequently visiting Northern Ireland to learn how PSNI has adopted a human rights culture and how the Policing Board carries out its oversight role in this regard. PSNI has now implemented over 200 recommendations made in 10 previous Annual Reports across a range of issues such as domestic abuse, hate crime, children and young people, public order, use of force, stop and search, covert policing, complaints and discipline and many more. The importance of having Annual Reports is reflected in the sheer breadth of work undertaken by the Policing Board and by the Human Rights Advisor in identifying emerging issues which pose new and evolving challenges for PSNI. The 2015 Annual Report contains 14 recommendations for PSNI relating to human rights training, policy and guidance in relation to Domestic Violence Protection Notices, the operation of the Youth Diversion Scheme, the deployment of Small Unmanned Aircraft, the service of non-molestation orders and police detention. As well as Annual Reports, the Policing Board and Human Rights Advisor monitor and report on PSNI’s human rights compliance through thematic reviews. These reviews provide a means of undertaking detailed examinations of specific areas of police policy and practice from a human rights perspective, using the community’s experience of policing to inform the evidence base against which compliance with human rights principles can be evaluated. The thematic reviews and associated follow-up reviews have made a combined total of 73 recommendations and have examined the police response to domestic abuse; children and young people; policing with and for lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals and transgender individuals; and police powers to stop and search and stop and question under the Terrorism Act 2000 and the Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Act 2007. The Board’s Human Rights Advisor is currently finalising a thematic review of the PSNI response to race hate crime, the findings of which will be published during 2016. The commitment of the Chief Constable and PSNI to ensuring a human rights based approach to policing is demonstrated by their acceptance and implementation of the recommendations made in previous Human Rights Annual Reports and thematic reviews. The 2015 Annual Report notes that nine recommendations from previous years were implemented during 2015. In implementing these recommendations, PSNI reported to the Performance Committee throughout 2015 on a range of issues including child sexual exploitation; the service of ex-parte non-molestation orders and occupation orders; training, policy and practices for responding to disability hate crime; terrorism detainees; healthcare within custody; and Youth Engagement Clinics. The Policing Board, through the work of its Human Rights Advisor and Performance Committee, will continue to monitor and report upon PSNI’s performance in ensuring a human rights compliant service. This is the 7th Human Rights Annual Report produced on behalf of the Committee by the Policing Board’s Human Rights Advisor, Alyson Kilpatrick BL. On behalf of the Policing Board, I would like to thank Alyson for her continued support and contribution. Anne Connolly Chair Northern Ireland Policing Board CONTENTS 1. PSNI Human Rights Programme of Action 2 2. Training 5 3. Policy 12 4. Operations 35 5. Complaints, Discipline and the Code of Ethics 55 6. Public Order 95 7. Use of Force 99 8. Covert Policing 115 9. Victims 140 10. Treatment of Suspects 196 11. Policing with the Community & Human Rights Awareness 211 12. Privacy, Data Protection and Freedom of Information 213 13. Children and Young People 216 Appendix 1: 2015 Recommendations 237 Appendix 2: Implementation of Recommendations from 2014 240 1 1. PSNI HUMAN RIGHTS PROGRAMME OF ACTION The Policing Board knows that a commitment to safeguarding human rights, the substantive and visible protection of those rights and the exposure of violations of rights if they do occur are the best means of building public confidence in policing and ensuring an effective and efficient police service which can police with the consent of the community. It is trite to say that a police service that cannot secure public confidence and maintain its legitimacy cannot function effectively. It is the public who provide the police with their legitimacy – it is their acceptance of the legitimacy of the police that gives the police their authority. That is the fundamental premise upon which the Performance Committee of the Policing Board (the Committee) monitors and reports upon the compliance of the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) with the Human Rights Act 1998. That was true when the PSNI was established and remains true today. In 1999, a central proposition of the Report of the Independent Commission on Policing for Northern Ireland (the Patten report) was that the fundamental purpose of policing should be, in the words of the Belfast Agreement 1998, “the protection and vindication of the human rights of all... There should be no conflict between human rights and policing: policing means protecting human rights”. 1 In 2001, that central proposition was accepted by the newly established PSNI whose new oath of office incorporated an unambiguous commitment to the protection of human rights as contained in the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) 2 and supplemented by other relevant human rights instruments.3 There followed, in 2003, a Code of Ethics which became the new discipline code for police officers laying down the standards of practice and conduct expected of police 1 A New Beginning: Policing in Northern Ireland, Report of the Independent Commission on Policing for Northern Ireland, September 1999, paragraph 4.1. 2 The ECHR was enshrined in domestic law by the Human Rights Act 1998 which amongst other things makes it unlawful for a public authority to act incompatibly with the rights contained in the ECHR. 3 Such as the United Nations Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials; the United Nations Basic Principles on the Use of Force and firearms by Law Enforcement Officials; and the European Police Code of Ethics. 2 officers. Importantly, the Code of Ethics also made officers aware of their obligations and rights under the Human Rights Act 1998. The Code of Ethics was revised and reissued in 20084 and has become “one of the success stories in advancing the human rights agenda in the PSNI”.5 In response to Recommendation 1 of the Patten report, which required a “comprehensive programme of action to focus policing in Northern Ireland on a human rights-based approach” the PSNI published a Human Rights Programme of Action. In the Programme of Action, which has been published each year since 2004, the PSNI demonstrates its commitment at an organisational level to embrace human rights as a core value in all police processes and as a guide to the behaviour of police officers and police staff. The Programme of Action also provides an opportunity for the PSNI to respond with specificity to the recommendations contained within each Human Rights Annual Report published by the Policing Board. The PSNI Programme of Action 2014/2015 was published on 2 June 2015 and is available to view online through the PSNI website.6 It was circulated by email to all police officers and staff and has been uploaded to the PSNI intranet (Policenet). In the Programme of Action the PSNI indicates its acceptance of 8 of the 9 recommendations made in the Human Rights Annual Report 2014 and outlines how it will implement them. In his introductory comments, Temporary Assistant Chief Constable Chris Noble welcomes the scrutiny and challenge of the Board and states that the PSNI regards human rights oversight, “as an opportunity to make policing policy and practice even better, more efficient and more effective”.7 He continues, “Operationalising human rights requires constant effort; it requires us to be accountable, transparent and open to learning.
Recommended publications
  • Serious and Organised Crime Strategy
    Serious and Organised Crime Strategy Cm 8715 Serious and Organised Crime Strategy Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for the Home Department by Command of Her Majesty October 2013 Cm 8715 £21.25 © Crown copyright 2013 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www. nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us [email protected] You can download this publication from our website at https://www.gov.uk/government/ publications ISBN: 9780101871525 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 2593608 10/13 33233 19585 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Contents Home Secretary Foreword 5 Executive Summary 7 Introduction 13 Our Strategic Response 25 PURSUE: Prosecuting and disrupting serious and 27 organised crime PREVENT: Preventing people from engaging 45 in serious and organised crime PROTECT: Increasing protection against 53 serious and organised crime PREPARE: Reducing the impact of serious and 65 organised crime Annex A: Accountability, governance and funding 71 Annex B: Departmental roles and responsibilities for 73 tackling serious and organised crime 4 Serious and Organised Crime Strategy Home Secretary Foreword 5 Home Secretary Foreword The Relentless Disruption of Organised Criminals Serious and organised crime is a threat to our national security and costs the UK more than £24 billion a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Ireland Policing Board Annual Report and Accounts Together with the Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General
    ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS FOR THE PERIOD 1 APRIL 2008 - 31 MARCH 2009 CORPORATE VISION To secure for all the people of Northern Ireland an effective, efficient, impartial, representative and accountable police service which will secure the confidence of the whole community by reducing crime and the fear of crime. ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS FOR THE PERIOD 1 APRIL 2008 - 31 MARCH 2009 Northern Ireland Policing Board Annual Report and Accounts together with the Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General. Presented to Parliament pursuant to Paragraph 7(3) b of Schedule 2 of the Police (NI) Act 2000. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 15 July 2009. HC 674 London: The Stationery Office £26.60 © Crown Copyright 2009 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and other departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. For any other use of this material please write to Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 4DU or e-mail: [email protected] ISBN 9780102948653 Contents Page 03 01 CHAIRMAN’S FOREWORD 04 02 CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S FOREWORD 09 03 MEMBERSHIP OF THE NORTHERN IRELAND POLICING BOARD 11 04 MANAGEMENT COMMENTARY 14 Background and principal
    [Show full text]
  • User Guide to Crime Statistics for England and Wales
    User Guide to Crime Statistics for England and Wales April 2017 Office for National Statistics About us Copyright and reproduction The Office for National Statistics © Crown copyright 2017 The Office for National Statistics (ONS) is the executive You may re-use this information (not including logos) office of the UK Statistics Authority, a non-ministerial free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms department which reports directly to Parliament. ONS of the Open Government Licence. is the UK government’s single largest statistical producer. It compiles information about the UK’s To view this licence, go to: society and economy, and provides the evidence-base http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- for policy and decision-making, the allocation of government-licence resources, and public accountability. The Director- or write to the Information Policy Team, The National General of ONS reports directly to the National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU Statistician who is the Authority's Chief Executive and the Head of the Government Statistical Service. email: [email protected] The Government Statistical Service Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent The Government Statistical Service (GSS) is a network to: [email protected] of professional statisticians and their staff operating both within the Office for National Statistics and across This publication is available for download at: more than 30 other government departments and www.ons.gov.uk agencies. Contacts This publication For information
    [Show full text]
  • St 9617 2004 Dcl 1
    Council of the European Union Brussels, 30 November 2020 (OR. en) 9617/04 DCL 1 LIMITE SCH-EVAL 33 COMIX 344 DECLASSIFICATION of document: 9617/04 RESTREINT UE dated: 17 May 2004 new status: LIMITE Subject: Questionnaire – Questions to UK on data protection arrangements relating to the UK’s national implementation of the Schengen Information System. - Answers from the UK Delegations will find attached the declassified version of the above document. The text of this document is identical to the previous version. 9617/04 DCL 1 KAL SMART 2.C.S1 LIMITE EN RESTREINT UE COUNCIL OF Brussels, 17 May 2004 THE EUROPEAN UNION 9617/04 RESTREINT UE SCH-EVAL 33 COMIX 344 NOTE from : UK delegation to : Schengen Evaluation Working Party No. prev. doc. : 9227/04 SCH-EVAL 25 COMIX 308 + ADD 1 Subject : Questionnaire – Questions to UK on data protection arrangements relating to the UK’s national implementation of the Schengen Information System. - Answers from the UK The United Kingdom has asked the Schengen Evaluation Group to undertake an evaluation of the data protection arrangements which it has in place to support the introduction of the Schengen Information System to the UK. As the UK’s technical solution to the SIS has not yet been finalised, the questions relate only to data protection arrangements. Questions relating to the management and handling of the data will be answered in the context of the full SIS evaluation which will take place once the UK’s national solution has been fully implemented. 1. Provide the list of services with access to SIS data See Annex A and Annex B 9617/04 WvdR/kve 1 DG H RESTREINT UE EN RESTREINT UE 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Asset Recovery Action Plan (
    GOV.UK 1. Home (https://www.gov.uk/) 2. Asset recovery action plan (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/asset-recovery-action-plan) 1. Home Office (https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/home-office) Policy paper Asset Recovery Action Plan, accessible Updated 13 September 2019 Contents Ministerial Foreword Introduction Section 1: Legal Powers Section 2: Strengthening our Operational Response Section 3: Continuously Review and Embed Best Practice Section 4: Fostering Innovation and Collaboration Appendix A: table of actions © Crown copyright 2019 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/version/3 (https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3) or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/asset-recovery-action- plan/asset-recovery-action-plan Ministerial Foreword Serious and organised crime is a threat to our national security. Money is the common thread that runs through almost all offending, as criminals use the proceeds of their crime to fund their lifestyle and conduct further crime. As set out in the Serious & Organised Crime Strategy (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/752850/SOC-2018- web.pdf) we are committed to working collaboratively with our partners and stakeholders to leave no safe space for those seeking to move, hide or use the proceeds of crime and corruption or to evade sanctions.
    [Show full text]
  • Archived Content Contenu Archivé
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. em, o. Commission for Commission des RoubylccComanadra,171Agnatztpthoiece plaintes du public contre la r Genclarrnene royale du Canada a COMMISSION FOR PUBLIC COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE RCMP 111 Police Investigating Police FINAL PUBLIC REPORT A Chair-initiated complaint and public interest investigation into public concerns about the impartiality of RCMP members conducting criminal investigations into other RCMP members in cases involving serious injury death.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland (PONI) DATA SHEET
    Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland (PONI) DATA SHEET There is probably no other State in the world that has undergone a similar process of profound and intense transformation in its conceptions, structures, practices and policing model as has Northern Ireland since the second half of the nineties. One of the most important figures that resulted from this reform is that of the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland (PONI), undoubtedly the most modern and powerful police external oversight mechanism in the world and a mandatory reference for any scholar or specialist interested in police accountability. Here is a data sheet with the most important aspects of this mechanism. Corporate Governance . The Police Ombudsman is appointed by Her Majesty, as a named person for a fixed term of seven years. His Office has 150 staff and an annual operating budget of around 9 million pounds . The Office of the Police Ombudsman is situated in Belfast and provides a continuous service 24 hours a day to the people and police of Northern Ireland. The Police Ombudsman is accountable to the Northern Ireland Assembly, through the Minister for Justice. The status of the Office of the Police Ombudsman is that of a non-departmental public body (NDPB) administrated through the Department of Justice. The Office does not carry out its functions on behalf of the Crown. The Police Ombudsman also investigates complaints against the Belfast Harbour Police, Larne Harbour Police, the Belfast International Airport Police and Ministry of Defence Police in Northern Ireland and the Serious Organised Crime Agency when its staff operates in this jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Victim Charter a Charter for Victims of Crime
    Victim Charter A Charter for victims of crime September 2015 VICTIM CHARTER Victim Charter VICTIM CHARTER VICTIM CHARTER Victim Charter A Charter for Victims of Crime Laid before the Northern Ireland Assembly by the Department of Justice under section 31(2) of the Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2015 September 2015 VICTIM CHARTER VICTIM CHARTER VICTIM CHARTER Contents Page no Overview of the key entitlements in the Victim Charter 5 Short guide to the criminal justice system 9 • Overview of service providers 9 • Criminal justice system guide 10 • Summary flowchart of the criminal justice process 13 Introduction 14 • Purpose of the Charter 14 • Who is this Charter for? 15 • Who can get services under the Charter? 15 • Who has to provide services under the Charter? 17 • General entitlements 18 • What if I don’t get the services I should? 21 • Can I comment on the Charter or services provided under it? 21 • Alternative formats 21 Special measures and additional support for victims with particular needs 22 • Assessment of your needs 22 • Additional support for victims with particular needs 23 Section 1: Reporting a crime and the police investigation 30 • Reporting a crime 30 • Information provided when reporting a crime 31 • Police investigation 33 • Progress of the police investigation 35 • Police alternative disposal and referral to the Public Prosecution Service 36 • Help from victim support service providers (whether or not you report a crime) 36 Section 2: Will it go to court (pre trial)? 38 • Victim and Witness Care Unit 38 • Alternatives
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Annual Report of the MPS/MPA 2004-05
    Metropolitan Police Service and Metropolitan Police Authority Annual Report 2004/05 Contents Joint foreword by the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service and the Chair of the Metropolitan Police Authority 3 Introduction 4 The priorities 5 Priority: Protecting the capital against terrorism 6 Objective: To minimise the risk to life and property from terrorist activity in London 6 Objective: To maintain an effective response to suspected and actual terrorist incidents 6 Priority: Reducing serious crime 10 Objective: To reduce the level of gun-enabled crime 10 Objective: To disrupt organised criminal activity of persons identified as Class A drugs suppliers 12 Objective: To dismantle organised criminal networks and seize their assets 13 Objective: To safeguard children and young persons from physical and sexual abuse 15 Priority: Promoting reassurance 16 Objective: To improve neighbourhood safety 16 Objective: To reduce the level of robbery compared with 2003/04 24 Objective: To improve our contribution to the criminal justice system 26 Objective: To recognise and respond appropriately to the differential impact of crime on people, taking into account their race, gender, sexual orientation, faith, age or disability 28 Supporting the priorities 34 Supporting the priorities 34 Managing our resources – the Directorate of Resources 37 Supporting our people – the Human Resources Directorate 41 Communicating our message – the Directorate of Public Affairs (DPA) 45 MPS financial performance 2004/05 45 The MPS response to the tsunami crisis 48 MPA review of performance 2004/05 50 MPA review of performance 2004/05 50 Performance indicators 2004/05 55 Performance tables 56 Objectives, measures and targets for 2005/06 61 Threatened/civil actions and damages paid 63 Police officers and police staff punished as a result of misconduct proceedings during 2004/05 64 Deaths following police contact during 2004/05 65 Alternative languages 66 Front cover: photo BRD Associates The assistance of the staff and students of Welling School, Bexley is gratefully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Records Review
    CRR Phase 2 Report A Common Sense Approach A review of the criminal records regime in England and Wales by Sunita Mason Independent Advisor for Criminality Information Management Report on Phase 2 1 Please note: All photographs used in this document are for illustrative purposes only. All persons depicted in the photographs are models. No connection is implied between those depicted and the actual roles and situations shown. Photo acknowledgment: iStockphoto LP Contents Preface 5 Executive Summary 6 Section 1: Definition & Recording 9 History of criminal records 10 Justification for keeping criminal records 11 Types of criminality information 11 Existing arrangements 15 A proposed working definition 15 Police information records 16 The concept of ‘recordable’ offences 16 Volumes of criminal offence convictions 17 Reconsidering the threshold for recordability 17 The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 19 Section 2: Management 22 The role and functions of the PNC 22 Data quality of PNC records 22 Is the PNC the only place to store records? 23 Options for the longer term 25 Strengthening the criminal records database 25 Microfiche records 25 Non-Police Prosecuting Agencies’ (NPPAs) records 26 Scotland’s and Northern Ireland’s criminal records 26 Storing police information records 27 Should criminal records ever be deleted? 27 Conviction records 27 Records of ‘out-of-court’ disposals - cautions, reprimands and warnings 29 Police information records 29 Could the administration of criminal records be made more straightforward, efficient and
    [Show full text]
  • Download Police Records: a Guide for Professionals
    Police Records: October A Guide for Professionals 2018 A guide to the organisations, guidance and laws that govern the keeping, sharing and use of police records held about an individual in England and Wales. By Alex Temple October 2018 Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Glossary of Terms.................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 What this document covers .......................................................................................................... 6 1.2 What this document does not cover ............................................................................................ 6 1.3 The meaning of “police records” .................................................................................................. 7 1.4 The meaning of “management” ................................................................................................... 8 1.5 Places where police records are kept ........................................................................................... 9 1.6 Spent and Unspent Convictions .................................................................................................. 12 1.7 Exemptions to the Rehabilitation
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Management, Gaming and Police Practice
    PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, GAMING AND POLICE PRACTICE A study of changing police behaviour in England and Wales during the era of New Public Management. By Rodger Patrick MSc. BA (Hons) A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Institute of Local Government Studies (INLOGOV) University of Birmingham January 2009 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT: This thesis examines the nature of ‘gaming’ in the police service and the extent to which it distorts policing priorities and performance measures. Performance Management, which formed an integral part of New Public Management, was introduced gradually to the police service in England and Wales during the 1990s. The Police and Magistrates Court Act 1994 gave Chief Officers of Police greater freedom on how they spent their budget allocation but there was an expectation that this would result in increased efficiency and improved performance. The Police Reform Act 2002 continued this trend by empowering the Home Secretary to set annual performance targets which the Police Service was expected to deliver. Performance management systems provided the means by which efficiency could be measured thus enabling central government to exert pressure on police forces to improve performance in the areas prioritised.
    [Show full text]