DOCSLIB.ORG

Confidential Memorandum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Confidential Memorandum CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM TO: Broadcasters FROM: RBA / NZTBC / ASA DATE: 31 July 2008 SUBJECT: Confidential Advice for Broadcasters on Election Advertising Compliance Introduction Information in this memorandum is intended only as a guide. If broadcasters consider that there may be a problem with election advertising, it is recommended that further advice be sought. Please contact the relevant industry associations (if they provide an advisory service) in the first instance and the ASA Secretariat is also available to assist. In relation to a technical problem about interpretation of the legislation, assistance may be available from the Electoral Commission or legal advice should be obtained. Please note: This information is not intended for political parties or candidates and should not be provided to them. The information in this memo is to assist broadcasters in relation to any election advertising they deal with as part of their business operations. BROADCAST MEDIA Relevant legislation Broadcasting Act 1989 Electoral Act 1993 Electoral Finance Act 2007 New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 What is an election ad? The definition of “election advertisement” in the Electoral Finance Act is very broad and states: “election advertisement — (a) means any form of words or graphics, or both, that can reasonably be regarded as doing 1 or more of the following: (i) encouraging or persuading voters to vote, or not to vote, for 1 or more specified parties or for 1 or more candidates or for any combination of such parties and candidates: (ii) encouraging or persuading voters to vote, or not to vote, for a type of party or for a type of candidate that is described or indicated by reference to views, positions, or policies that are or are not held, taken, or pursued (whether or not the name of a party or the name of a candidate is stated); and (b) includes— (i) a candidate advertisement; and (ii) a party advertisement.” Exceptions are provided for in the Act (including news) but generally, media accepting advertising will have to consider the definition above in deciding whether or not an advertisement an “election advertisement” or not. Most advertisements will be, but for instance, announcement of a party’s conference, provided it does not meet the criteria in the definition above, is unlikely to be caught by the Electoral Finance Act. The definition of “election programme” is in the Broadcasting Act and states: “Election programme means, subject to subsection (2) of this section, a programme that—(a) Encourages or persuades or appears to encourage or persuade voters to vote for a political party or the election of any person at an election; or (b) Encourages or persuades or appears to encourage or persuade voters not to vote for a political party or the election of any person at an election; or (c) Advocates support for a candidate or for a political party; or (d) Opposes a candidate or a political party; or (e) Notifies meetings held or to be held in connection with an election:” (note the near identical definitions between the two Acts, except for the reference in ‘election advertisement’ to ‘views, positions or policies’). Who can advertise on Radio and Television? Registered Political Parties and Candidates (spending limits apply) Registered and Unregistered Third Parties (spending limits apply) PART A – Registered Political Parties and Candidates What are the Rules on Content? Requirements of the Broadcasting Standards Authority All election advertisements on radio and television are defined by the Broadcasting Act as “election programmes”, and as such are bound by the BSA Election Programmes Code . You should also note that all the normal requirements for editorial content Codes apply to election advertisements, with the exception of the requirement to present a range of significant viewpoints on controversial issues of public importance. It is also worth noting that in general, the BSA gives considerable weight to Section 14 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, which supports a high degree of freedom of speech. A copy of the Election Programmes Code of Broadcasting Practice is attached as Appendix A or see the BSA website ( www.bsa.govt.nz ) or contact the BSA office, 0800 366996 or [email protected]. The BSA Code includes the following requirements: • Fact clearly distinguished by opinion • Prohibition on material that denigrates a political party or candidate • No imitation of an existing programme in a manner which is likely to mislead • Opening and closing addresses clearly identified (applies only to TVNZ and Radio New Zealand). Requirements of the Electoral Act 1993 ( Not relevant for Radio Broadcasters) Section 197 of the Electoral Act covers corrupt and illegal practices and as in previous elections, it is an offence to publish an imitation ballot paper in full or in part that may contain an “instruction to vote”. However the Electoral Commission has advised that it considers an election advertisement that contains a tick against a party or candidate name does not, of itself, offend this provision. Requirements of the Electoral Finance Act 2007 In addition to the BSA rules above, Section 63 of the Act requires every election advertisement to contain the first name and surname of the promoter and their home address, right down to the house number and street, road etc. In some cases, candidates will nominate themselves as the promoter / financial agent, in other cases it may be the secretary of the relevant political party or some other person. If the media are in doubt with regard to the identity of the promoter, the advertiser should be asked to confirm in writing that they are the registered promoter in relation to that candidate or party. When can they advertise? All broadcast election programmes are subject to the normal restrictions in relation to when advertisements can be broadcast. The period during which election programmes are permitted is from Writ Day to the day before Election Day. Writ Day will be announced when the date of the General Election is confirmed by the Prime Minister and members will be advised. NOTE: no election programmes may be run on Election Day, starting at 12.01am. Are there Rules about Advertising Rates? The Broadcasting Act requires that all political parties that are broadcasting election programmes are to be given identical terms. (For radio & TV?) This is the Government VID rate. It is permissible to offer candidates volume based discounts, provided the qualifying criteria are accessible to all advertisers. What if there is a Complaint? All “election advertisements” in the broadcast media should be sent directly to the Broadcasting Standards Authority. If a complaint comes to the media, it should be forwarded immediately to the BSA. Given the potential impact on the democratic process, the BSA is committing to 72-hour turn around of complaints, if at all possible, and is asking broadcasters to respond within 24 hours. While it is appreciated that this is likely to place time pressure on broadcasters’ internal processes, (especially since it is only reasonable to expect the advertiser to prepare the response), compliance with this request will be helpful. Note also that Complainants have up to 60 working days after broadcast to lodge a complaint thus it is necessary to retain copies of all “election advertisements” broadcast during the campaign for that period. For ease and speed of identification in the event of a complaint it is suggested that log identification of election advertisements be maintained. Information on Spending Limits and Invoicing Spending Limits Despite the problems encountered in the 2005 election, broadcasters have no legal rights or control over compliance with spending limits. Nonetheless, you are strongly advised to insist on a written acknowledgement from all election advertisers, that they understand what their limit is, inclusive of GST (and get them to spell this out) and that the proposed expenditure falls within this. Broadcast Election Programmes by Political Parties are limited to the amount allocated by the Electoral Commission and are listed below. Those political parties that have not been granted a broadcasting allocation are not able to advertise in broadcast media. The allocation has been challenged and could change but at the date of this memo it is as follows: Parties Monetary Opening Closing allocation address, address, (incl. GST) minutes minutes Total available $3,211,875 72 30 Labour Party, National Party $1,000,000 12 6 Green Party, M āori Party, NZ First $240,000 8 3 The ACT Party, Progressive, UNITED FUTURE $100,000 4 3 Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party, Democrats for social $10,000, plus 1 0 credit, Kotahitanga Te Manamotu Hake Tiriti o Waitangi , a production Libertarianz*, New World Order , New Zealand Liberals , package for Residents Action Movement , South Island Party , Alliance, the opening Family Party, Workers Party of New Zealand address worth (those in italics were not registered as at 29 th April 2008) over $7000 * will not receive the monetary allocation Note: Nineteen parties gave notice that they consider they will qualify for a broadcasting allocation. Of these, six are not currently registered but will need to be registered by writ day in order to receive an allocation. Note that in addition to Electoral Commission funding, political parties are entitled to spend in total the above amount, plus $1 million plus $20k for each electorate in which they have a candidate, but in the broadcast media can spend ONLY up to the limits listed in the table above. Also, all electorate candidates have a personal spending limit of up to $20,000 including GST and are able to spend all or some of this money on broadcast ‘election programmes’. Invoicing The Electoral Finance Act has a requirement regarding billing candidates and parties for election advertising. At the latest, a candidate’s financial agent must be billed for any election expenses within 20 working from the date the election results are notified in the Gazette.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iranshah Udvada Utsav
    HAMAZOR - ISSUE 1 2016 Dr Nergis Mavalvala Physicist Extraordinaire, p 43 C o n t e n t s 04 WZO Calendar of Events 05 Iranshah Udvada Utsav - vahishta bharucha 09 A Statement from Udvada Samast Anjuman 12 Rules governing use of the Prayer Hall - dinshaw tamboly 13 Various methods of Disposing the Dead 20 December 25 & the Birth of Mitra, Part 2 - k e eduljee 22 December 25 & the Birth of Jesus, Part 3 23 Its been a Blast! - sanaya master 26 A Perspective of the 6th WZYC - zarrah birdie 27 Return to Roots Programme - anushae parrakh 28 Princeton’s Great Persian Book of Kings - mahrukh cama 32 Firdowsi’s Sikandar - naheed malbari 34 Becoming my Mother’s Priest, an online documentary - sujata berry COVER 35 Mr Edulji Dinshaw, CIE - cyrus cowasjee Image of the Imperial 39 Eduljee Dinshaw Road Project Trust - mohammed rajpar Custom House & bust of Mr Edulji Dinshaw, CIE. & jameel yusuf which stands at Lady 43 Dr Nergis Mavalvala Dufferin Hospital. 44 Dr Marlene Kanga, AM - interview, kersi meher-homji PHOTOGRAPHS 48 Chatting with Ami Shroff - beyniaz edulji 50 Capturing Histories - review, freny manecksha Courtesy of individuals whose articles appear in 52 An Uncensored Life - review, zehra bharucha the magazine or as 55 A Whirlwind Book Tour - farida master mentioned 57 Dolly Dastoor & Dinshaw Tamboly - recipients of recognition WZO WEBSITE 58 Delhi Parsis at the turn of the 19C - shernaz italia 62 The Everlasting Flame International Programme www.w-z-o.org 1 Sponsored by World Zoroastrian Trust Funds M e m b e r s o f t h e M a n a g i
    [Show full text]
  • From Privy Council to Supreme Court: a Rite of Passage for New Zealand’S Legal System
    THE HARKNESS HENRY LECTURE FROM PRIVY COUNCIL TO SUPREME COURT: A RITE OF PASSAGE FOR NEW ZEALAND’S LEGAL SYSTEM BY PROFESSOR MARGARET WILSON* I. INTRODUCTION May I first thank Harkness Henry for the invitation to deliver the 2010 Lecture. It gives me an opportunity to pay a special tribute to the firm for their support for the Waikato Law Faculty that has endured over the 20 years life of the Faculty. The relationship between academia and the profession is a special and important one. It is essential to the delivery of quality legal services to our community but also to the maintenance of the rule of law. Harkness Henry has also employed many of the fine Waikato law graduates who continue to practice their legal skills and provide leadership in the profession, including the Hamilton Women Lawyers Association that hosted a very enjoyable dinner in July. I have decided this evening to talk about my experience as Attorney General in the establish- ment of New Zealand’s new Supreme Court, which is now in its fifth year. In New Zealand, the Attorney General is a Member of the Cabinet and advises the Cabinet on legal matters. The Solici- tor General, who is the head of the Crown Law Office and chief legal official, is responsible for advising the Attorney General. It is in matters of what I would term legal policy that the Attorney General’s advice is normally sought although Cabinet also requires legal opinions from time to time. The other important role of the Attorney General is to advise the Governor General on the appointment of judges in all jurisdictions except the Mäori Land Court, where the appointment is made by the Minister of Mäori Affairs in consultation with the Attorney General.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2008 Election: Reviewing Seat Allocations Without the Māori Electorate Seats June 2010
    working paper The 2008 Election: Reviewing seat allocations without the Māori electorate seats June 2010 Sustainable Future Institute Working Paper 2010/04 Authors Wendy McGuinness and Nicola Bradshaw Prepared by The Sustainable Future Institute, as part of Project 2058 Working paper to support Report 8, Effective M āori Representation in Parliament : Working towards a National Sustainable Development Strategy Disclaimer The Sustainable Future Institute has used reasonable care in collecting and presenting the information provided in this publication. However, the Institute makes no representation or endorsement that this resource will be relevant or appropriate for its readers’ purposes and does not guarantee the accuracy of the information at any particular time for any particular purpose. The Institute is not liable for any adverse consequences, whether they be direct or indirect, arising from reliance on the content of this publication. Where this publication contains links to any website or other source, such links are provided solely for information purposes and the Institute is not liable for the content of such website or other source. Published Copyright © Sustainable Future Institute Limited, June 2010 ISBN 978-1-877473-56-2 (PDF) About the Authors Wendy McGuinness is the founder and chief executive of the Sustainable Future Institute. Originally from the King Country, Wendy completed her secondary schooling at Hamilton Girls’ High School and Edgewater College. She then went on to study at Manukau Technical Institute (gaining an NZCC), Auckland University (BCom) and Otago University (MBA), as well as completing additional environmental papers at Massey University. As a Fellow Chartered Accountant (FCA) specialising in risk management, Wendy has worked in both the public and private sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Hate Speech: Balancing Expresssion, Religion, Discrimination and Harm
    POLICY PAPER Law and Human Rights | June 2004 Hate Speech: Balancing expresssion, religion, discrimination and harm I INTRODUCTION In 1869, John Stuart Mill considered that the question application of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 of a legislature or executive prescribing what opinions and provides a brief overview of “hate speech” laws in were and were not allowed to be spoken had been so the international community. “triumphantly enforced” that as a writer, he need not This policy paper is necessarily broad in its scope, pay any attention to the topic:1 so as to highlight the number and range of issues It is not in constitutional countries, to be apprehended, involved and provide an accurate background to the that the government, whether completely responsible to issue. Ultimately this paper aims to determine whether the people or not, will attempt to control the expression of legislative intervention is required in the area of “hate opinion, except when in doing so it makes itself the organ of speech” by focusing on the rights and freedoms that the general intolerance of the public. compete for priority. Mill would be disappointed to know that many The paper fi nds that restricting the fundamental constitutional and other western countries are and protected right to manifest religion and have debating the limits of expression with renewed free expression must be balanced with a similarly enthusiasm and many writers are indeed paying close fundamental and important right and concludes that attention to the topic. there is no such fundamental right in law or policy New Zealand is such a country.
    [Show full text]
  • A Politics and the Campaign
    Notes Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.24 Elapsed Time 00:00:00.00 Frequency Table jinterest A1: how interested in politics Frequency Percent Valid Percent Valid Very interested 412 16.7 16.7 16.7 Fairly interested 1157 46.8 47.0 63.7 Slightly interested 769 31.1 31.2 94.9 Not at all interested 125 5.0 5.1 100.0 Total 2463 99.5 100.0 Missing System 12 .5 Total 2475 100.0 jrefbefore A2: knowledge of referendum before the fact Frequency Percent Valid Percent Valid Yes 2192 88.6 89.3 89.3 No 167 6.7 6.8 96.1 Don't know 95 3.8 3.9 100.0 Total 2453 99.1 100.0 Missing System 22 .9 Total 2475 100.0 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Valid Yes 2041 82.5 83.3 83.3 No 300 12.1 12.2 95.6 Don't know 108 4.4 4.4 100.0 Total 2449 99.0 100.0 Missing System 26 1.0 Total 2475 100.0 jintnt_work A4: access to the Internet at work Frequency Percent Valid Percent Valid 0 1444 58.3 58.3 58.3 Internet access at work 1031 41.7 41.7 100.0 Total 2475 100.0 100.0 jintnt_home A4: access to the Internet at home Frequency Percent Valid Percent Valid 0 524 21.2 21.2 21.2 Internet access at home 1951 78.8 78.8 100.0 Total 2475 100.0 100.0 Page 3 jintnt_mob A4: access to the Internet on a mobile device Frequency Percent Valid Percent Valid 0 1843 74.5 74.5 74.5 632 25.5 25.5 100.0 Total 2475 100.0 100.0 jintnt_else A4: access to the Internet somewhere else Frequency Percent Valid Percent Valid 0 2345 94.7 94.7 94.7 130 5.3 5.3 100.0 Total 2475 100.0 100.0 jintnt_none A4: no access to the Internet Frequency Percent Valid Percent Valid 0 2096 84.7 84.7 84.7 No Internet access
    [Show full text]
  • Hauraki-Waikato
    Hauraki-Waikato Published by the Parliamentary Library July 2009 Table of Contents Hauraki-Waikato: Electoral Profile......................................................................................................................3 2008 Election Results (Electorate) .................................................................................................................4 2008 Election Results - Party Vote .................................................................................................................4 2005 Election Results (Electorate) .................................................................................................................5 2005 Election Results - Party Vote .................................................................................................................5 Voter Enrolment and Turnout 2005, 2008 .......................................................................................................6 Hauraki-Waikato: People ...................................................................................................................................7 Population Summary......................................................................................................................................7 Age Groups of the Māori Descent Population .................................................................................................7 Ethnic Groups of the Māori Descent Population..............................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Confidence and Supply Agreement with United Future New Zealand
    Confidence and Supply Agreement with United Future New Zealand United Future agrees to provide confidence and supply for the term of this Parliament, to a National-led government The relationship between United Future and the government will be based on good faith and no surprises. Consultation arrangements The Government will consult with United Future on issues including: • The broad outline of the legislative programme • Key legislative measures • Major policy issues; and • Broad budget parameters. Consultation will occur in a timely fashion to ensure United Future views can be incorporated into final decision-making. Formal consultation will be managed between the Prime Minister's Office and the Office of the Leader of United Future. Other co-operation will include: • Access to relevant Ministers • Regular meetings between the Prime Minister and the United Future Leader • Advance notification to the other party of significant announcements by either the Government or United Future; and • Briefings by the Government on significant issues before any public announcement. Ministerial Position The Leader of United Future will be appointed to the positions of Minister of Revenue, Associate Minister of Health and Associate Minister of Conservation. These ministerial positions will be outside of Cabinet. 1 Policy Programme The National-led government has agreed during this term of Parliament to adopt and implement the following broad principles, policies and priorities advanced by United Future: • Passage of the Game Animal Council legislation
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Commission Releases Full List of Parties and Candidates for 2011 Election
    Electoral Commission releases full list of parties and candidates for 2011 election The Electoral Commission has released the nominations for the 2011 General Election, with 13 registered political parties and 544 candidates contesting the election. Registered Parties Seeking the Party Vote The registered parties seeking the party vote are: ACT New Zealand Alliance Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party Conservative Party Democrats for Social Credit Green Party Labour Party Libertarianz Mana Māori Party National Party New Zealand First Party United Future There were 19 registered political parties and 682 candidates contesting the election in 2008. Candidates A total of 544 candidates (electorate and list) are standing in this year’s election. This compares with 682 candidates in the 2008 election. 91 candidates are on the party list only and 73 are standing as electorate candidates only. 30 electorate candidates are standing as independents or representing unregistered parties (only registered parties are eligible to contest the party vote). The number of candidates standing both as an electorate candidate and on a party list is 380. The electorate with the most candidates is Wellington Central with 12 and the electorate with the lowest number of candidates is Waiariki with 3. 397 men and 147 women are standing in the 2011 General Election. In 2008 there were 488 men and 194 women standing. 1 The elections website www.elections.org.nz has a full list of electorate candidates http://www.elections.org.nz/voting/voting-info and the party lists http://www.elections.org.nz/elections/party-lists. Below is the number of list candidates and the number of electorate candidates representing those parties seeking the party vote.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of New Media by Political Parties in the 2008 National Election
    Chair in e-Government THE USE OF NEW MEDIA BY POLITICAL PARTIES IN THE 2008 NATIONAL ELECTION HUGO GONG AND PROFESSOR MIRIAM LIPS Victoria University of Wellington November 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge the support from the sponsors of the VUW Chair in e-Government: Datacom Systems Limited, State Services Commission, Cisco New Zealand Limited and FX Networks Limited. The authors also would like to express their appreciation for research contributions from the National Party, the Labour Party, ACT New Zealand, the Maori Party and United Future, especially for their precious time and valuable participation in the research interviews. Copyright Notice All contents of this report are original and copyright © 2009 by the authors of this report – Hugo Gong and Professor Miriam Lips. Any works or material from other authors and sources in this report has been properly referenced. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, by any means (electronic, photocopying, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the authors. THE USE OF NEW MEDIA BY POLITICAL PARTIES IN THE 2008 NATIONAL ELECTION Page 2 of 122 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 7 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................................... 9 2.1 CHARACTERISTICS, DEFINITIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS OF ‘E-CAMPAIGNING’ ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand: Background and Bilateral Relations with the United States
    New Zealand: Background and Bilateral Relations with the United States Bruce Vaughn Specialist in Asian Affairs May 27, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32876 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress New Zealand: Background and Bilateral Relations with the United States Summary New Zealand is increasingly viewed as a stalwart partner of the United States that welcomes U.S. presence in its region. New Zealand and the United States enjoy very close bilateral ties across the spectrum of relations between the two countries. These ties are based on shared cultural traditions and values as well as on common interests. New Zealand is a stable and active democracy with a focus on liberalizing trade in the Asia-Pacific region. New Zealand also has a history of fighting alongside the United States in most of its major conflicts including World War I, World War II, Korea, and Vietnam. New Zealand is a regular contributor to international peace and stability operations and has contributed troops to the struggle against militant Islamists in Afghanistan, where it has a Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) in Bamiyan Province. The bilateral relationship between the United States and New Zealand was strengthened significantly through the signing of the Wellington Declaration in November 2010. At that time, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and New Zealand Prime Minister John Key signaled that past differences over nuclear policy have been set aside as the two described the relationship as the strongest and most productive it has been in 25 years. In the mid-1980s New Zealand adopted a still-in-effect policy of not allowing nuclear armed or nuclear powered ships to visit New Zealand ports.
    [Show full text]
  • Ensuring Indigenous Rights: New Zealand and UNDRIP
    Honors Thesis Honors Program 5-11-2019 Ensuring Indigenous Rights: New Zealand and UNDRIP Olivia Round [email protected] Jodi Finkel Loyola Marymount University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/honors-thesis Recommended Citation Round, Olivia and Finkel, Jodi, "Ensuring Indigenous Rights: New Zealand and UNDRIP" (2019). Honors Thesis. 190. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/honors-thesis/190 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Thesis by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ensuring Indigenous Rights: New Zealand and UNDRIP A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements of the University Honors Program of Loyola Marymount University by Olivia Round May 14, 2019 1 Contents Introduction: An analysis of New Zealand and indigenous rights……………………………3 1 Defining indigenous rights 2 The adoption of UNDRIP as the most comprehensive protection of global indigenous rights 3 New Zealand as a global leader in indigenous rights 4 Research Methods 5 Roadmap Chapter one: The protection of human rights in the UN…………………………………….12 1 The origin of human rights protections in the UN 2 UN and the protection of group rights Chapter two: Indigenous peoples and the right to land...........................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Maori Affairs Policy
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. , I I CLOSING THE GAPS? THE POLITICS OF - MAORI AFFAIRS POLICY A thesis presented in partialfulfi lment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology at Massey University, Albany, New Zealand. Louise Virginia Humpage 2002 iii ABSTRACT In searching for ways to decolonise, indigenous peoples have promoted indigenous models of self-determination. Governments, in response, have attempted to protect state legitimacy through the depoliticisation of indigenous claims. An analysis of 'Closing the Gaps', a policy strategy introduced by the Labour-Alliance government in June 2000, illustrates that this has certainly been the case in Aotearoa New Zealand. The policy strategy provides an entry point into exploring the conceptual tensions contained within government policy for Maori, the indigenous peoples of Aotearoa New Zealand. Based on an analysis of government documents and interview data, the thesis focuses on three main initiatives incorporated under the 'Closing the Gaps' umbrella. Each initiative highlights a number of bureaucratic, political and conceptual factors that explain why the strategy failed to match political rhetoric. The thesis argues that, in its eagerness to demonstrate a 'commitment' to Maori, the Labour-Alliance government neglected to distinguish between two different socio­ political projects. The first, 'social inclusion' for all disadvantaged peoples, was framed by a broader 'social development' approach whose ultimate goal was 'national cohesion'.
    [Show full text]