DOCSLIB.ORG

The Proposed Sirius Solar Pv Project 3, Near Upington in the Northern Cape Province

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Proposed Sirius Solar Pv Project 3, Near Upington in the Northern Cape Province SOLA ASSETS (PTY) LTD THE PROPOSED SIRIUS SOLAR PV PROJECT 3, NEAR UPINGTON IN THE NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE LANDSCAPE & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT July 2019 Prepared by: Prepared for: Environmental Planning and Design Savannah Environmental (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 50910, 1st Floor, Block 2, 5 Woodlands Drive Musgrave Road, Office Park 4062 Cnr Woodlands Drive & Western Service Road Tel: 083 703 2995 Woodmead Email: [email protected] 2191 Tel: 011 656 3237 Fax: 086 684 0547 Email: [email protected] PREPARED BY PO BOX 50910, MUSGRAVE ROAD, 4062, SOUTH AFRICA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 GENERAL .................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 BACKGROUND OF SPECIALIST .................................................................................................... 4 1.4 BRIEF AND RELEVANT GUIDELINES ............................................................................................. 4 1.5 LIMITATIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS ............................................................................................. 5 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 MOTIVATION AND PROJECT CONTEXT ....................................................................................... 7 2.2 DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................. 7 2.3 MAIN PROJECT COMPONENTS ................................................................................................... 8 2.3.5 Other Infrastructure ................................................................................................................ 9 2.3.6 Temporary Works .................................................................................................................... 9 3 DESCRIPTION OF RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT AND RECEPTORS ......................................................... 13 3.1 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER .......................................................................................................... 13 3.1.1 Landform and Drainage ......................................................................................................... 13 3.1.2 Landcover .............................................................................................................................. 15 3.1.3 Vegetation Patterns .............................................................................................................. 17 3.2 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER AREAS ............................................................................................... 18 3.2.1 Landscape Character Area and Visual Absorption Capacity .................................................. 18 3.3 VISUAL RECEPTORS .................................................................................................................. 19 3.3.1 Identified visual receptors ..................................................................................................... 19 4 THE GENERAL NATURE OF POTENTIAL VISUAL IMPACTS ................................................................... 27 4.1 GENERAL .................................................................................................................................. 27 4.3 THE NATURE OF LIKELY VIEWS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................ 27 4.3.1 General .................................................................................................................................. 27 4.2 THE likely NATURE OF viiws of THE PROPOSED Solar Array ...................................................... 28 4.3 Glare from the PV array ........................................................................................................... 33 4.4 Security Lighting ....................................................................................................................... 34 5 VISIBILITY AND THE LIKELY NATURE OF VIEWS OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ........................... 36 5.1 ZONES OF THEORETICAL VISIBILITY .......................................................................................... 36 5.2 THE EXTENT OF POSSIBLE IMPACTS .......................................................................................... 36 5.3 ZONES OF THEORETICAL VISIBILITY .......................................................................................... 37 5.3.1 General Visibility ................................................................................................................... 38 5.3.2 Specific considerations regarding the nature of impacts ...................................................... 38 6 VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................... 46 6.1 ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED ........................................................................................................ 47 6.2 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................. 47 6.2 VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................. 49 6.2.1 The proposed development could change the character and sense of place of the landscape setting (Landscape Change) .................................................................................................. 49 6.2.2 The proposed development could change the character of the landscape as seen from the N14. ....................................................................................................................................... 50 6.2.3 The proposed development could change the character of the landscape as seen from the R359. ..................................................................................................................................... 53 6.2.4 The proposed development could change the character of the landscape as seen from the Lutzputs Road. ....................................................................................................................... 55 6.2.5 The proposed development could change the character of the landscape as seen from local homesteads. .......................................................................................................................... 58 6.2.6 The proposed development could change the character of the landscape as seen from local settlement areas. .................................................................................................................. 63 6.2.7 Glare Impacts. ....................................................................................................................... 64 6.2.8 The potential visual impact of operational, safety and security lighting of the facility at night on observers. ........................................................................................................................................... 65 7 IMPACT STATEMENT ......................................................................................................................... 67 7.1 VISIBILITY ................................................................................................................................. 67 Sirius Solar PV Project 3, Visual Impact Assessment, April 2019. Page 2 7.2 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER AREAS AND VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPACITY..................................... 67 7.3 SENSITIVE RECEPTORS .............................................................................................................. 67 7.4 Visual Impact ........................................................................................................................... 68 7.5 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ............................................................................................................ 69 7.6 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................ 69 APPENDICES I SPECIALIST’S BRIEF CV II GUIDELINES FOR INVOLVING VISUAL AND AESTHETIC SPECIALISTS IN EIA PROCESSES (CONTENTS PAGES ONLY) III FORMULA FOR DERIVING THE APPROXIMATE VISUAL HORIZON IV CUMULATIVE IMPACT ASSESSMENT MAPS 1 SITE LOCATION 2 PROJECT CONTEXT 3 SITE LAYOUT 4 LANDFORM AND DRAINAGE 5 LANDCOVER 6 VEGETATION TYPES 7 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER AREAS 8 ZTV OF PV ARRAY 9 COMPARATIVE ZTV OF SUBSTATION ALTERNATIVES 10 ZTV OF POWER LINE PHOTOGRAPHIC PLATES 1 EXISTING UPINGTON MAIN TRANSMISSION SUBSTATION 2 VIEW FROM THE N14 APPROXIMATELY 5KM TO THE NORTHEAST OF THE PROJECT SITE LOOKING ALONG THE ROAD TOWARDS THE PROPOSED PROJECT 3 VIEW FROM THE N14 LOOKING DOWN INTO THE ORANGE RIVER VALLEY 4 VIEW OF THE BEZALEL WINE FARM WITHIN THE ORANGE RIVER VALLEY 5 VIEW OF KHI SOLAR ONE FROM THE NORTH EAST 6 VIEW OF UNINHABITED LODGE WITHIN THE PROJECT PROPERTY 7 PLATEAU LCA 8 RIVER CORRIDOR LCA 9 VIEW FROM THE R359 ACROSS THE RIVER VALLEY LCA 10 SETTLEMENT AND HOMESTEADS WITHIN THE RIVER VALLEY LCA 11 THE N14 12 HOMESTEADS WITHIN THE PLATEAU LCA 13 THE LUTZPUTS ROAD 14 THE UPINGTON TO KAKAMAS BRANCH LINE 15 VIEW FROM VP1 ON
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kai ! Garib Final IDP 2020 2021
    KAI !GARIB MUNICIPALITY Integrated Development Plan 2020/2021 “Creating an economically viable and fully developed municipality, which enhances the standard of living of all the inhabitants / community of Kai !Garib through good governance, excellent service delivery and sustainable development.” June 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD.................................................................................................................1 2. IDP PLANNING PROCESS:......................................................................................2 2.1 IDP Steering Committee:...........................................................................................3 2.2 IDP Representative Forum.........................................................................................3 2.3 Process Overview: Steps & Events:.............................................................................4 2.4 Legislative Framework:…………………………………………………………………………………………...6 3. THE ORGANISATION:............................................................................................15 3.1 Institutional Development………………………………………………………………………………..... 15 3.2 The Vision & Mission:...............................................................................................16 3.3 The Values of Kai !Garib Municipality which guides daily conduct ...............................16 3.4 The functioning of the municipality............................................................................16 3.4.1 Council and council committees..............................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • 60935864-4X4-Routes-Through-Southern-Africa-ISBN-9781770262904.Pdf
    Contents PAGE Introduction 6 Overview map of 4X4 routes 8 Chapter 1 – Crossing the Cederberg – Tankwa to Sandveld 10 CERES ◗ KAGGA KAMMA ◗ OLD POSTAL ROUTE ◗ BIEDOUW VALLEY ◗ WUPPERTAL ◗ KROMRIVIER ◗ BOEGOEBERG ◗ LAMBERT’S BAY ◗ JAKKALSKLOOF TRAIL ◗ KLEINTAFELBERG ◗ PIKETBERG Chapter 2 – The West Coast – !Kwha ttu to Hondeklipbaai and beyond 22 PATERNOSTER ◗ LAMBERT’S BAY ◗ BEACH CAMP ◗ BUFFELSRIVIER TRAIL Chapter 3 – The Richtersveld – a place of great splendour 34 STEINKOPF ◗ SENDELINGSDRIF ◗ DE HOOP ◗ RICHTERSBERG ◗ KOKERBOOMKLOOF ◗ EKSTEENFONTEIN ◗ VIOOLSDRIF Chapter 4 – Khaudum and Mamili – explore the remote parks of the Caprivi Strip 44 GROOTFONTEIN ◗ TSUMKWE ◗ NYAE NYAE PLAINS ◗ SIKERETI ◗ KHAUDUM ◗ NGEPI ◗ MUDUMU AND MAMILI ◗ KONGOLA OR KATIMA MULILO Chapter 5 – The Kaokoland – an inhospitable wonderland 54 KAMANJAB ◗ OPUWO ◗ KUNENE RIVER LODGE ◗ ENYANDI ◗ EPUPA ◗ VAN ZYL’S PASS ◗ OTJINHUNGWA ◗ MARBLE MINE ◗ PURROS ◗ HOANIB RIVER ◗ WARMQUELLE Chapter 6 – The Namaqua Eco-Trail – an Orange River odyssey 64 POFADDER ◗ PELLA ◗ GAUDOM ◗ KAMGAB ◗ VIOOLSDRIF ◗ XAIMANIP MOUTH ◗ TIERHOEK ◗ HOLGAT RIVER ◗ ALEXANDER BAY Chapter 7 – Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park – the place of great thirst 74 UPINGTON ◗ TWEE RIVIEREN ◗ NOSSOB ◗ MABUASEHUBE ◗ KURUMAN Chapter 8 – Central Kalahari Game Reserve – a true African wilderness 84 KHAMA RHINO SANCTUARY ◗ DECEPTION VALLEY ◗ PIPER’S PAN ◗ BAPE CAMP ◗ KHUTSE Chapter 9 – Faces of the Namib – the world’s oldest desert 94 SOLITAIRE ◗ HOMEB ◗ KUISEB RIVER CANYON ◗ CONCEPTION BAY ◗ MEOB BAY ◗ OLIFANTSBAD ◗
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 1 Hia Report, Blaauwskop Settlement Low-Cost Housing Development, Northern Cape
    PHASE 1 HIA REPORT, BLAAUWSKOP SETTLEMENT LOW-COST HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, NORTHERN CAPE PROPOSED FORMALISATION OF BLAAUWSKOP SETTLEMENT LOW-COST HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ON PORTION 30 OF FARM BLAAUWSKOP NO. 36, BLAAUWSKOP SETTLEMENT, KENHARDT ROAD, KAI !GARIB LOCAL MUNICIPALITY, Z.F. MGCAWU DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE. PREPARED FOR: ENVIROAFRICA PREPARED BY: JAN ENGELBRECHT & HEIDI FIVAZ UBIQUE HERITAGE CONSULTANTS 12 MARCH 2019 Web: www.ubiquecrm.com Mail: [email protected] Office: (+27)116750125 Address: P.O. Box 5022 Weltevredenpark 1715 CSD Supplier Number MAAA0586123 PHASE 1 HIA REPORT, BLAAUWSKOP SETTLEMENT LOW-COST HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, NORTHERN CAPE Client: EnviroAfrica CC. P.O. Box 5367, Helderberg, 7135 Fax: 086 512 0154 / Tel: 021 8511616 / E-mail: [email protected] Contact Person: Bernard de Witt E-mail: [email protected] Heritage Consultant: UBIQUE Heritage Consultants Contact Person: Jan Engelbrecht (archaeologist and lead CRM specialist) Member of the Association of Southern African Professional Archaeologists: Member number: 297 Cell: (+27) 0828456276 E-mail: [email protected] Heidi Fivaz (archaeologist) Member of the Association of Southern African Professional Archaeologists: Member number: 433 Cell: (+27) 0721418860 E-mail: [email protected] For this project, Mr Engelbrecht was responsible for the field survey of the development footprint, identification of heritage resources, and recommendations. Ms Fivaz was responsible for research and report compilation. Desktop research completed by
    [Show full text]
  • Juwi Garob WEF SIA Scoping Report
    SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT BUSHMANLAND PV FACILITY NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE APRIL 2020 Prepared By Tony Barbour Tony Barbour ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING AND RESEARCH 10 Firs Avenue, Claremont, 7708, South Africa (Tel) 27-21-761 2355 - (Fax) 27-21-761 2355 - (Cell) 082 600 8266 (E-Mail) [email protected] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION AND LOCATION Cape EAPrac was appointed by Bushmanland PV (Pty) Ltd to manage the Basic Assessment (BA) process for the proposed 100 MW Bushmanland PV Facility. The proposed development site is located approximately 30 km south west of Upington and 16 km north east of Keimoes in the Northern Cape Province. The site is situated within the Kai !Garib Local Municipality (KGLM), which is located within the ZF Mgcawu District Municipality (ZFMDM). Tony Barbour Environmental Consulting was appointed by Cape EAPrac to undertake a specialist Social Impact Assessment (SIA) as part of a Basic Assessment (BA) process. This report contains the findings of the SIA for the 100 MW Bushmanland PV Facility. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED SOLAR ENERGY FACILITY The proposed Bushmanland PV will have a net generating capacity of 100 MW. The construction phase is expected to extend over a period of ~18-24 months and create approximately 300 employment opportunities. The operational phase will employ approximately 20 people full time for a period of up to 20 years. The capital expenditure on completion is anticipated to be in the region of R 2 billion (2020 Rand values). The energy will be linked via an on-site substation to the Eskom grid 1. The project is therefore an Independent Power Producer (IPP) project.
    [Show full text]
  • Flower Route Map 2017
    K o n k i e p en w R31 Lö Narubis Vredeshoop Gawachub R360 Grünau Karasburg Rosh Pinah R360 Ariamsvlei R32 e N14 ng Ora N10 Upington N10 IAi-IAis/Richtersveld Transfrontier Park Augrabies N14 e g Keimoes Kuboes n a Oranjemund r Flower Hotlines O H a ib R359 Holgat Kakamas Alexander Bay Nababeep N14 Nature Reserve R358 Groblershoop N8 N8 Or a For up-to-date information on where to see the Vioolsdrif nge H R27 VIEWING TIPS best owers, please call: Eksteenfontein a r t e b e e Namakwa +27 (0)72 760 6019 N7 i s Pella t Lekkersing t Brak u Weskus +27 (0)63 724 6203 o N10 Pofadder S R383 R383 Aggeneys Flower Hour i R382 Kenhardt To view the owers at their best, choose the hottest Steinkopf R363 Port Nolloth N14 Marydale time of the day, which is from 11h00 to 15h00. It’s the s in extended ower power hour. Respect the ower Tu McDougall’s Bay paradise: Walk with care and don’t trample plants R358 unnecessarily. Please don’t pick any buds, bulbs or N10 specimens, nor disturb any sensitive dune areas. Concordia R361 R355 Nababeep Okiep DISTANCE TABLE Prieska Goegap Nature Reserve Sun Run fels Molyneux Buf R355 Springbok R27 The owers always face the sun. Try and drive towards Nature Reserve Grootmis R355 the sun to enjoy nature’s dazzling display. When viewing Kleinzee Naries i R357 i owers on foot, stand with the sun behind your back. R361 Copperton Certain owers don’t open when it’s overcast.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction of a CSP and CPV/ PV Plant In, De Aar, Northern Cape Province of South Africa
    MAINSTREAM RENEWABLE POWER Construction of a CSP and CPV/ PV Plant in, De Aar, Northern Cape Province of South Africa Draft Environmental Impact Report - Ref #12/12/20/2025 Issue Date: 13 May 2011 Revision No.: 1 Project No.: 10273 Date: 13 May 2011 Construction of a CSP and CPV/ PV Plant in, De Aar, Northern Cape Document Title: Province of South Africa: Draft Environmental Impact Report Author: Lucy Chimoyi Revision Number: 1 Checked by: Liesl Koch Approved: Liesl Koch Signature: For: SiVEST Environmental Division COPYRIGHT IS VESTED IN SiVEST IN TERMS OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT (ACT 98 OF 1978) AND NO USE OR REPRODUCTION OR DUPLICATION THEREOF MAY OCCUR WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE AUTHOR The Independent Environmental Assessment Practitioner in terms of Regulation 17(1): We, SiVEST Environmental, declare that we – . act as the Independent Environmental Assessment Practitioners in this application for the proposed construction a Concentrated Solar Plant (CSP) and Concentrated Photovoltaic (CPV/ PV) Plant in, De Aar, Northern Cape Province of South Africa. do not have and will not have any financial interest in the undertaking of the activity, other than remuneration for work performed in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2006; . have and will not have any vested interest in the proposed activity proceeding; . have no, and will not engage in, conflicting interests in the undertaking of the activity; and . will provide the competent authority with access to all information at our disposal regarding the application, whether such information is favourable to the applicant or not. MAINSTREAM RENEWABLE POWER prepared by: SiVEST Environmental Draft Environmental Impact Report Revision No.
    [Show full text]
  • Substation and Associated 400Kv Transmission and 132Kv Distribution Lines for a Proposed Solar Park and Csp Site in the Northern Cape
    SUBSTATION AND ASSOCIATED 400KV TRANSMISSION AND 132KV DISTRIBUTION LINES FOR A PROPOSED SOLAR PARK AND CSP SITE IN THE NORTHERN CAPE VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Produced for: ESKOM HOLDINGS (LTD) Produced by: MetroGIS (Pty) Ltd. PO Box 384, La Montagne, 0184 Tel: (012) 349 2884/5 Fax: (012) 349 2880 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.metrogis.co.za On behalf of: Zitholele Consulting (Pty) Ltd. - October 2012 - CONTENTS 1. STUDY APPROACH 1.1. Qualification and Experience of the Practitioner 1.2. Assumptions and Limitations 1.3. Level of Confidence 1.4. Methodology 2. BACKGROUND 3. SCOPE OF WORK 4. RELEVANT LEGISLATION AND GUIDELINES 5. THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 6. RESULTS 6.1 Potential visual exposure 6.2 Visual distance / observer proximity to the facility 6.3. Viewer incidence / viewer perception 6.4. Visual absorption capacity 6.5. Visual impact index 6.6 Visual impact assessment: methodology 6.7 Visual impact assessment: primary impacts 6.8. Visual impact assessment: secondary impacts 6.9. The potential to mitigate visual impacts 7. COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE ALTERNATIVES 7.1. Approach 7.2. Comparative Visual Assesment: Aries Corridor Alternatives 7.3. Comparative Visual Assesment: Ferrum Corridor Alternatives 7.4. Comparative Visual Assesment: Niewehoop Corridor Alternatives 8. CONCLUSION / RECOMMENDATIONS 9. IMPACT STATEMENT 10. MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME 11. REFERENCES / DATA SOURCES MAPS Map 1a: Locality and proposed alignment of the Aries Corridor and alternatives. Map 1b: Locality and proposed alignment of the Ferrum Corridor and alternatives. Map 1c: Locality and proposed alignment of the Niewehoop Corridor and alternatives. Map 2a: Land cover and land use along the Aries Corridor and alternatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Photovoltaic Solar Plant on the Farm Rooipad No. 15 Near Augrabies, Northern Cape Province
    PALAEONTOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT: RECOMMENDED EXEMPTION FROM FURTHER PALAEONTOLOGICAL STUDIES Proposed Photovoltaic Solar Plant on the Farm Rooipad No. 15 near Augrabies, Northern Cape Province John E. Almond PhD (Cantab.) Natura Viva cc, PO Box 12410 Mill Street, Cape Town 8010, RSA [email protected] February 2012 Executive summary The proposed small solar plant development near Augrabies, 2 to 5 km south of the River Orange, Northern Cape, is underlain by (1) ancient Precambrian igneous and metamorphic bedrocks that do not contain fossils as well as (2) sparsely fossiliferous or unfossiliferous superficial sediments of probable Quaternary to Recent age. In view of the very low palaeontological sensitivity of the study region, no further specialist studies or mitigation are considered necessary for this project as far as fossil heritage is concerned. Neither of the alternative development options is preferred on palaeontological heritage grounds. However, should substantial fossil remains ( e.g. vertebrate bones and teeth) be encountered during construction, the responsible ECO should inform SAHRA at the earliest opportunity to consider possible mitigation measures. 1. Project description The company Mulilo Renewable Energy Pty Ltd is proposing to construct a 10 Megawatt Photovoltaic (PV) Solar Energy Generation Facility close to the Blouputs Electrical substation near Augrabies in the Kai! Garib Local Municipal area (Siyanda District Municipality) Northern Cape Province. The study area on Portion 9 of the Farm Rooipad No. 15 is located about 37 km northwest of the small town of Kakamas, just north of the R359 tar road and within 2 to 5 km of the Orange River (Fig. 1). The proposed solar generation facility would consist of an array of black coloured panels up to three metres high covering an area of less than 20 hectares.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Aid South Africa Annual Report 2017/18
    TAKING ACTION TO MAKE HUMAN RIGHTS A REALITY EVERY DAY INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT 2017-2018 VISION VISION A SOUTH AFRICA IN WHICH THE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ENSHRINED IN THE CONSTITUTION ARE REALISED TO ENSURE EQUALITY, JUSTICE AND A BETTER LIFE FOR ALL. MISSION MISSION TO BE THE LEADER IN THE PROVISION OF ACCESSIBLE, SUSTAINABLE, ETHICAL, QUALITY AND INDEPENDENT LEGAL SERVICES TO THE POOR AND VULNERABLE. VALUES VALUES • PASSION FOR JUSTICE AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS • UBUNTU • INTEGRITY • ACCOUNTABILITY • SERVICE EXCELLENCE • PEOPLE CENTRED SUSTAINABLE 2017-2018 REPORT ANNUAL INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT GOAL 16 TARGET 16.3 LEGAL AID SOUTH AFRICA Promote the rule of law at the national 1 and international levels, and ensure equal access to justice for all NATIONAL FOOTPRINT LEGAL AID SA INFRASTRUCTURE LEGAL AID SA NATIONAL FOOTPRINT Musina Local Offices Makhado Thohoyandou Mozambique 64 Soshanguve Bochum Giyani NORTH WEST Pretoria Lephalale LIMPOPO Polokwane Tzaneen Phalaborwa GAUTENG Modimolle Mokopane Tembisa Lebowakgomo Satellite Offices Krugersdorp N1 Burgersfort Alexandra MPUMALANGA 64 Johannesburg Benoni Bushbuckridge Germiston Botswana Siyabuswa Soweto Nigel Groblersdal Westonaria Nelspruit N4 Ga-Rankuwa Heidelberg Kwa-Mhlanga N4 Vereeniging Witbank Tonga Provincial Offices Mafikeng Rustenburg Middelburg 6 Lichtenburg GAUTENG Eerstehoek NORTH WEST MPUMALANGA Delareyville Carletonville Ermelo Swaziland Potchefstroom Secunda Vryburg Namibia Klerksdorp Piet Retief Standerton N2 Ingwavuma Kuruman Wolmaransstad Frankfort National
    [Show full text]
  • A Diesel Smell in the Dust
    GRAVEL TRAVEL NORTHERN CAPE Adiesel smell in the dust Between Namaqualand and the Kalahari you can get into cruise mode on deserted gravel roads. Forests of quiver trees wereflowering when Johan de Smidt drove three long gravel stretches between Loeriesfontein and Upington. JOHAN DE SMIDT photographs Hit the (dirt) road, Jack. Road signs like this one spell an escape from traffic. This one is near the start of Snakes alive –it’saforest! The quiver tree forest near Kenhardt is your chance to have aclose look at these iconic trees. Just watch out for snakes, though. amore than hour-long good gravel drive from Loeriesfontein. bring my goats and sheep to graze flowing with the Gariep.There hasn’t On the wayto Brandvlei we sawsome on the map looks like ashortcut gravel the dryseason. We stop to look anyway, here in the hills along the Gariep been another vehicle in sight for kilome- die-hard little flowers and near Kenhardt road between his town and Kakamas butdon’tknowwhatitis. because fodder is too expensive.” tre after dusty kilometre. we were surprised by aquiver tree forest is arutted stretch from hell. We should But if someone spies something Life on the edge under the The RockeryRoute is the third where Vanessa almost stood on aviper. rather take the much better R357 to thatbegins with a“p” near yetanother Fast facts E a s y ‘INorthernCape sun has lined the face greatgravel stretch we’vetravelled But it’shere, next to the languid Gariep, Brandvlei and then head north on the medium-sized grey bird of prey on a of Cornelius Coetzee.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Cultural Resources
    Cultural heritage impact assessment for the PROPOSED HOTEL DEVELOPMENT ON A SECTION OF THE FARM KAKAMAS SUID 28, MARCHAND, KAI !GARIB MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment Hotel Development, Marchand CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED HOTEL DEVELOPMENT ON A SECTION OF THE FARM KAKAMAS SUID 28, MARCHAND, KAI !GARIB MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Report No: 2014/JvS/039 Status: Final Revision No: 0 Date: July 2014 Prepared for: MEG Omgewingsimpakstudies Representative: Ms Marquerite Geldenhuys Postal Address: Private Bag X5879, Postnet Suite 63, Upington, 8800 Tel: (054) 491 3144 E-mail: [email protected] Prepared by: J van Schalkwyk (D Litt et Phil), Heritage Consultant ASAPA Registration No.: 168 Principal Investigator: Iron Age, Colonial Period, Industrial Heritage Postal Address: 62 Coetzer Avenue, Monument Park, 0181 Mobile: 076 790 6777 Fax: 012 347 7270 E-mail: [email protected] Declaration: I, J.A. van Schalkwyk, declare that I do not have any financial or personal interest in the proposed development, nor its developers or any of their subsidiaries, apart from the provision of heritage assessment and management services. J A van Schalkwyk (D Litt et Phil) Heritage Consultant July 2014 ii Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment Hotel Development, Marchand EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED HOTEL DEVELOPMENT ON A SECTION OF THE FARM KAKAMAS SUID 28, MARCHAND, KAI !GARIB MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE It is proposed to develop a hotel on a section of land located southeast of the hamlet of Marchand in the Northern Cape Province. In accordance with Section 38 of the NHRA, an independent heritage consultant was appointed by MEG Omgewingsimpakstudies to conduct a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) to determine if any sites, features or objects of cultural heritage significance occur within the boundaries of the area where it is planned to develop the hotel.
    [Show full text]
  • Straussheim Solar Pv Power Projects Traffic Impact
    Portion 1 of the Farm N'Rougas Zuid No 121, Kenhardt 7/9, STRAUSSHEIM SOLAR PV POWER PROJECTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT MAY 2016 Project: 7051.02 PO Box 25054, Langenhoven Park, 9330, 12 AG Visser Street, Langenhoven Park, Bloemfontein Tel & Fax: 051 446 2647, Cell: 083 381 5884, E-mail: [email protected] REPORT SHEET Property Description: Portion 1 of the Farm N'Rougas Zuid No 121, Kenhardt. Municipal Area: ZF Mgcawu District Municipality Application: Type of Report: Traffic Impact Assessment Project Number: 7051.02 Declaration I, Koot Marais, author of this study, hereby certify that I am a professional traffic engineer (registration No 920023) and that I have the required experience and training in the field of traffic and transportation engineering as required by the Engineering Council of South Africa (ECSA), to compile traffic impact studies and I take full responsibility for the content, including all calculations, conclusions and recommendations made herein. Compiled By: Koot Marais Pr Eng Signed: Date: May 2016 PREPARED BY: ` 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 1 INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 Aim of the Study 4 1.2 Background 4 1.3 Site Location 5 1.4 Development 6 1.5 Scope of Analysis 7 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 8 2.1 Existing Road Network 8 2.2 Road Planning 9 3 TRIP GENERATION & CAPACITY CONSIDERATIONS 10 4 ACCESS 12 4.1 Access at Position A 13 4.1.1 Location and Spacing of Access 14 4.2 Access at Position B 15 4.2.1 Road Classification 16 4.2.2 Location and Spacing of Access 17 4.2.3 Sight Distances 18 4.2.4 Access Layout 19 4.3 Summary 20 5 INTERNAL ROADS 21 6 EXTERNAL ROUTES 22 6.1 Possible Routes 22 7.
    [Show full text]