DOCSLIB.ORG

Juwi Garob WEF SIA Scoping Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Juwi Garob WEF SIA Scoping Report SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT BUSHMANLAND PV FACILITY NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE APRIL 2020 Prepared By Tony Barbour Tony Barbour ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING AND RESEARCH 10 Firs Avenue, Claremont, 7708, South Africa (Tel) 27-21-761 2355 - (Fax) 27-21-761 2355 - (Cell) 082 600 8266 (E-Mail) [email protected] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION AND LOCATION Cape EAPrac was appointed by Bushmanland PV (Pty) Ltd to manage the Basic Assessment (BA) process for the proposed 100 MW Bushmanland PV Facility. The proposed development site is located approximately 30 km south west of Upington and 16 km north east of Keimoes in the Northern Cape Province. The site is situated within the Kai !Garib Local Municipality (KGLM), which is located within the ZF Mgcawu District Municipality (ZFMDM). Tony Barbour Environmental Consulting was appointed by Cape EAPrac to undertake a specialist Social Impact Assessment (SIA) as part of a Basic Assessment (BA) process. This report contains the findings of the SIA for the 100 MW Bushmanland PV Facility. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED SOLAR ENERGY FACILITY The proposed Bushmanland PV will have a net generating capacity of 100 MW. The construction phase is expected to extend over a period of ~18-24 months and create approximately 300 employment opportunities. The operational phase will employ approximately 20 people full time for a period of up to 20 years. The capital expenditure on completion is anticipated to be in the region of R 2 billion (2020 Rand values). The energy will be linked via an on-site substation to the Eskom grid 1. The project is therefore an Independent Power Producer (IPP) project. APPROACH TO THE STUDY The approach to the SIA study is based on the Western Cape Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning Guidelines for Social Impact Assessment (February 2007). These guidelines have been endorsed by the national Department of Environmental Affairs (DEA), and are based on international best practice. The key activities in the SIA process embodied in the guidelines include: • Describing and obtaining an understanding of the proposed intervention (type, scale, location), the communities likely to be affected and determining the need and scope of the SIA; • Collecting baseline data on the socio-economic environment; • Identifying and collecting data on the key social issues related to the proposed development. This requires consultation with affected individuals and communities; • Assessing and documenting the significance of social impacts associated with the proposed intervention; • Identifying alternatives and mitigation measures. In this regard, the study involved: • Review of demographic data from the 2011 Census Survey and 2016 Household Community Survey; 1 The grid connection is being assessed as part of a separate BA process. • Review of relevant planning and policy frameworks; • Site specific information collected during the site visit to the area and interviews with key stakeholders; • Review of information from similar projects; • Identification of social issues associated with the proposed project. SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS The assessment section is divided into: • Assessment of compatibility with relevant policy and planning context (“planning fit”); • Assessment of social issues associated with the construction phase; • Assessment of social issues associated with the operational phase; • Assessment of social issues associated with the decommissioning phase; • Assessment of the “no development” alternative; • Assessment of cumulative impacts. POLICY AND PLANNING ISSUES The findings of the review indicate that renewable energy is strongly supported at a national, provincial and local level. At a national and provincial level the development of and investment in renewable energy is supported by the National Development Plan (NDP), New Growth Path Framework and National Infrastructure Plan, which all make reference to renewable energy. The proposed SEF also supports a number of objectives contained in the Northern Cape Province (NCP) Provincial Growth and Development Strategy. Renewable energy is also supported at a district and local level. The Bushmanland PV facility is also located within the Upington Solar REDZ which was formally gazetted in 20182. The area has therefore been identified as suitable for the establishment of large-scale solar energy facilities. CONSTRUCTION PHASE The key social issues associated with the construction phase include: Potential positive impacts • Creation of employment and business opportunities, and the opportunity for skills development and on-site training. The construction phase is expected to extend over a period of 14-18 months and create approximately 300 employment opportunities. Of this total ~ 60% (180) will be available to low-skilled workers (construction labourers, security staff etc.), 25% (75) to semi-skilled workers (drivers, equipment operators etc.) and 15% (45) to skilled personnel (engineers, land surveyors, project managers etc.). The total wage bill for the construction phase is estimated to be in the region of R50 million (2020 rand value). Most of the employment opportunities, specifically the low and semi-skilled opportunities, are likely to be available to local residents in the area, specifically residents from local settlements, such as Brugge, Klippunt, Dyasons Klip, Oranjevallei, Louisvale, Kanoneiland, Bloemsmond, and Keimoes. The majority of the beneficiaries are likely to be historically disadvantaged (HD) members of the community. This would represent a significant positive social benefit in an area with limited employment 2 GN114 of 2018 ii Bushmanland PV Social Impact Assessment Report April 2020 opportunities. However, in the absence of specific commitments from the developer to employ local contractors the potential for meeting local employment targets may be limited. In addition, the low education and skills levels in the area may hamper potential opportunities for local communities. The potential benefits for local communities are confirmed by the findings of the Overview of the Independent Power Producers Procurement Programme (IPPPP) undertaken by the Department of Energy, National Treasury and DBSA (March 2019). The review found that by the end of March 2019 the 64 renewable energy projects that had been successfully completed had created 31 633 job years3 of employment, compared to the anticipated 20 689. This was 53% more than planned. The study also found that significantly more people from local communities were employed during construction than was initially planned. The capital expenditure associated with the construction phase will be in the region of R 2 billion (2020 Rand value). A percentage of the wage bill will be spent in the local economy which will create opportunities for local businesses in Keimoes and Upington. The sector of the local economy that is most likely to benefit from the proposed development is the local service industry. The potential opportunities for the local service sector would be linked to accommodation, catering, cleaning, transport and security, etc. associated with the construction workers on the site. Potential negative impacts • Impacts associated with the presence of construction workers on local communities; • Impacts related to the potential influx of job-seekers; • Increased risks to livestock and farming infrastructure associated with the construction related activities and presence of construction workers on the site; • Increased risk of grass fires associated with construction related activities; • Noise, dust and safety impacts of construction related activities and vehicles; • Impact on productive farmland. The findings of the SIA indicate that the significance of all the potential negative impacts with mitigation were Low Negative. The potential negative impacts can therefore be effectively mitigated if the recommended mitigation measures are implemented. Given that most of the low and semi-skilled construction workers can be sourced from the local area the potential risk posed by construction workers on local family structures and social networks is regarded as low for the community as a whole. Table 1 summarises the significance of the impacts associated with the construction phase. 3 The equivalent of a full-time employment opportunity for one person for one year iii Bushmanland PV Social Impact Assessment Report April 2020 Table 1: Summary of social impacts during construction phase Impact Significance Significance No Mitigation With Mitigation Creation of employment and Medium Medium business opportunities (Positive impact) (Positive impact) Presence of construction Medium Low workers and potential impacts (Negative impact for (Negative impact for on family structures and community as a whole) community as a whole) social networks Influx of job seekers Low Low (Negative) (Negative) Safety risk, stock theft and Medium Low damage to farm infrastructure (Negative impact) (Negative impact) associated with presence of construction workers Increased risk of veld fires Medium Low (Negative impact) (Negative impact) Impact of heavy vehicles and Medium Low construction activities (Negative impact) (Negative impact) Loss of farmland Medium Low (Negative impact) (Negative impact) OPERATIONAL PHASE Potential positive impacts • The establishment of infrastructure to generate renewable energy; • Creation of employment and business opportunities. The operational phase will also create opportunities for skills development and training; • Benefits associated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kai ! Garib Final IDP 2020 2021
    KAI !GARIB MUNICIPALITY Integrated Development Plan 2020/2021 “Creating an economically viable and fully developed municipality, which enhances the standard of living of all the inhabitants / community of Kai !Garib through good governance, excellent service delivery and sustainable development.” June 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD.................................................................................................................1 2. IDP PLANNING PROCESS:......................................................................................2 2.1 IDP Steering Committee:...........................................................................................3 2.2 IDP Representative Forum.........................................................................................3 2.3 Process Overview: Steps & Events:.............................................................................4 2.4 Legislative Framework:…………………………………………………………………………………………...6 3. THE ORGANISATION:............................................................................................15 3.1 Institutional Development………………………………………………………………………………..... 15 3.2 The Vision & Mission:...............................................................................................16 3.3 The Values of Kai !Garib Municipality which guides daily conduct ...............................16 3.4 The functioning of the municipality............................................................................16 3.4.1 Council and council committees..............................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • 60935864-4X4-Routes-Through-Southern-Africa-ISBN-9781770262904.Pdf
    Contents PAGE Introduction 6 Overview map of 4X4 routes 8 Chapter 1 – Crossing the Cederberg – Tankwa to Sandveld 10 CERES ◗ KAGGA KAMMA ◗ OLD POSTAL ROUTE ◗ BIEDOUW VALLEY ◗ WUPPERTAL ◗ KROMRIVIER ◗ BOEGOEBERG ◗ LAMBERT’S BAY ◗ JAKKALSKLOOF TRAIL ◗ KLEINTAFELBERG ◗ PIKETBERG Chapter 2 – The West Coast – !Kwha ttu to Hondeklipbaai and beyond 22 PATERNOSTER ◗ LAMBERT’S BAY ◗ BEACH CAMP ◗ BUFFELSRIVIER TRAIL Chapter 3 – The Richtersveld – a place of great splendour 34 STEINKOPF ◗ SENDELINGSDRIF ◗ DE HOOP ◗ RICHTERSBERG ◗ KOKERBOOMKLOOF ◗ EKSTEENFONTEIN ◗ VIOOLSDRIF Chapter 4 – Khaudum and Mamili – explore the remote parks of the Caprivi Strip 44 GROOTFONTEIN ◗ TSUMKWE ◗ NYAE NYAE PLAINS ◗ SIKERETI ◗ KHAUDUM ◗ NGEPI ◗ MUDUMU AND MAMILI ◗ KONGOLA OR KATIMA MULILO Chapter 5 – The Kaokoland – an inhospitable wonderland 54 KAMANJAB ◗ OPUWO ◗ KUNENE RIVER LODGE ◗ ENYANDI ◗ EPUPA ◗ VAN ZYL’S PASS ◗ OTJINHUNGWA ◗ MARBLE MINE ◗ PURROS ◗ HOANIB RIVER ◗ WARMQUELLE Chapter 6 – The Namaqua Eco-Trail – an Orange River odyssey 64 POFADDER ◗ PELLA ◗ GAUDOM ◗ KAMGAB ◗ VIOOLSDRIF ◗ XAIMANIP MOUTH ◗ TIERHOEK ◗ HOLGAT RIVER ◗ ALEXANDER BAY Chapter 7 – Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park – the place of great thirst 74 UPINGTON ◗ TWEE RIVIEREN ◗ NOSSOB ◗ MABUASEHUBE ◗ KURUMAN Chapter 8 – Central Kalahari Game Reserve – a true African wilderness 84 KHAMA RHINO SANCTUARY ◗ DECEPTION VALLEY ◗ PIPER’S PAN ◗ BAPE CAMP ◗ KHUTSE Chapter 9 – Faces of the Namib – the world’s oldest desert 94 SOLITAIRE ◗ HOMEB ◗ KUISEB RIVER CANYON ◗ CONCEPTION BAY ◗ MEOB BAY ◗ OLIFANTSBAD ◗
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 1 Hia Report, Blaauwskop Settlement Low-Cost Housing Development, Northern Cape
    PHASE 1 HIA REPORT, BLAAUWSKOP SETTLEMENT LOW-COST HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, NORTHERN CAPE PROPOSED FORMALISATION OF BLAAUWSKOP SETTLEMENT LOW-COST HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ON PORTION 30 OF FARM BLAAUWSKOP NO. 36, BLAAUWSKOP SETTLEMENT, KENHARDT ROAD, KAI !GARIB LOCAL MUNICIPALITY, Z.F. MGCAWU DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE. PREPARED FOR: ENVIROAFRICA PREPARED BY: JAN ENGELBRECHT & HEIDI FIVAZ UBIQUE HERITAGE CONSULTANTS 12 MARCH 2019 Web: www.ubiquecrm.com Mail: [email protected] Office: (+27)116750125 Address: P.O. Box 5022 Weltevredenpark 1715 CSD Supplier Number MAAA0586123 PHASE 1 HIA REPORT, BLAAUWSKOP SETTLEMENT LOW-COST HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, NORTHERN CAPE Client: EnviroAfrica CC. P.O. Box 5367, Helderberg, 7135 Fax: 086 512 0154 / Tel: 021 8511616 / E-mail: [email protected] Contact Person: Bernard de Witt E-mail: [email protected] Heritage Consultant: UBIQUE Heritage Consultants Contact Person: Jan Engelbrecht (archaeologist and lead CRM specialist) Member of the Association of Southern African Professional Archaeologists: Member number: 297 Cell: (+27) 0828456276 E-mail: [email protected] Heidi Fivaz (archaeologist) Member of the Association of Southern African Professional Archaeologists: Member number: 433 Cell: (+27) 0721418860 E-mail: [email protected] For this project, Mr Engelbrecht was responsible for the field survey of the development footprint, identification of heritage resources, and recommendations. Ms Fivaz was responsible for research and report compilation. Desktop research completed by
    [Show full text]
  • Flower Route Map 2017
    K o n k i e p en w R31 Lö Narubis Vredeshoop Gawachub R360 Grünau Karasburg Rosh Pinah R360 Ariamsvlei R32 e N14 ng Ora N10 Upington N10 IAi-IAis/Richtersveld Transfrontier Park Augrabies N14 e g Keimoes Kuboes n a Oranjemund r Flower Hotlines O H a ib R359 Holgat Kakamas Alexander Bay Nababeep N14 Nature Reserve R358 Groblershoop N8 N8 Or a For up-to-date information on where to see the Vioolsdrif nge H R27 VIEWING TIPS best owers, please call: Eksteenfontein a r t e b e e Namakwa +27 (0)72 760 6019 N7 i s Pella t Lekkersing t Brak u Weskus +27 (0)63 724 6203 o N10 Pofadder S R383 R383 Aggeneys Flower Hour i R382 Kenhardt To view the owers at their best, choose the hottest Steinkopf R363 Port Nolloth N14 Marydale time of the day, which is from 11h00 to 15h00. It’s the s in extended ower power hour. Respect the ower Tu McDougall’s Bay paradise: Walk with care and don’t trample plants R358 unnecessarily. Please don’t pick any buds, bulbs or N10 specimens, nor disturb any sensitive dune areas. Concordia R361 R355 Nababeep Okiep DISTANCE TABLE Prieska Goegap Nature Reserve Sun Run fels Molyneux Buf R355 Springbok R27 The owers always face the sun. Try and drive towards Nature Reserve Grootmis R355 the sun to enjoy nature’s dazzling display. When viewing Kleinzee Naries i R357 i owers on foot, stand with the sun behind your back. R361 Copperton Certain owers don’t open when it’s overcast.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction of a CSP and CPV/ PV Plant In, De Aar, Northern Cape Province of South Africa
    MAINSTREAM RENEWABLE POWER Construction of a CSP and CPV/ PV Plant in, De Aar, Northern Cape Province of South Africa Draft Environmental Impact Report - Ref #12/12/20/2025 Issue Date: 13 May 2011 Revision No.: 1 Project No.: 10273 Date: 13 May 2011 Construction of a CSP and CPV/ PV Plant in, De Aar, Northern Cape Document Title: Province of South Africa: Draft Environmental Impact Report Author: Lucy Chimoyi Revision Number: 1 Checked by: Liesl Koch Approved: Liesl Koch Signature: For: SiVEST Environmental Division COPYRIGHT IS VESTED IN SiVEST IN TERMS OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT (ACT 98 OF 1978) AND NO USE OR REPRODUCTION OR DUPLICATION THEREOF MAY OCCUR WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE AUTHOR The Independent Environmental Assessment Practitioner in terms of Regulation 17(1): We, SiVEST Environmental, declare that we – . act as the Independent Environmental Assessment Practitioners in this application for the proposed construction a Concentrated Solar Plant (CSP) and Concentrated Photovoltaic (CPV/ PV) Plant in, De Aar, Northern Cape Province of South Africa. do not have and will not have any financial interest in the undertaking of the activity, other than remuneration for work performed in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2006; . have and will not have any vested interest in the proposed activity proceeding; . have no, and will not engage in, conflicting interests in the undertaking of the activity; and . will provide the competent authority with access to all information at our disposal regarding the application, whether such information is favourable to the applicant or not. MAINSTREAM RENEWABLE POWER prepared by: SiVEST Environmental Draft Environmental Impact Report Revision No.
    [Show full text]
  • Substation and Associated 400Kv Transmission and 132Kv Distribution Lines for a Proposed Solar Park and Csp Site in the Northern Cape
    SUBSTATION AND ASSOCIATED 400KV TRANSMISSION AND 132KV DISTRIBUTION LINES FOR A PROPOSED SOLAR PARK AND CSP SITE IN THE NORTHERN CAPE VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Produced for: ESKOM HOLDINGS (LTD) Produced by: MetroGIS (Pty) Ltd. PO Box 384, La Montagne, 0184 Tel: (012) 349 2884/5 Fax: (012) 349 2880 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.metrogis.co.za On behalf of: Zitholele Consulting (Pty) Ltd. - October 2012 - CONTENTS 1. STUDY APPROACH 1.1. Qualification and Experience of the Practitioner 1.2. Assumptions and Limitations 1.3. Level of Confidence 1.4. Methodology 2. BACKGROUND 3. SCOPE OF WORK 4. RELEVANT LEGISLATION AND GUIDELINES 5. THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 6. RESULTS 6.1 Potential visual exposure 6.2 Visual distance / observer proximity to the facility 6.3. Viewer incidence / viewer perception 6.4. Visual absorption capacity 6.5. Visual impact index 6.6 Visual impact assessment: methodology 6.7 Visual impact assessment: primary impacts 6.8. Visual impact assessment: secondary impacts 6.9. The potential to mitigate visual impacts 7. COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE ALTERNATIVES 7.1. Approach 7.2. Comparative Visual Assesment: Aries Corridor Alternatives 7.3. Comparative Visual Assesment: Ferrum Corridor Alternatives 7.4. Comparative Visual Assesment: Niewehoop Corridor Alternatives 8. CONCLUSION / RECOMMENDATIONS 9. IMPACT STATEMENT 10. MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME 11. REFERENCES / DATA SOURCES MAPS Map 1a: Locality and proposed alignment of the Aries Corridor and alternatives. Map 1b: Locality and proposed alignment of the Ferrum Corridor and alternatives. Map 1c: Locality and proposed alignment of the Niewehoop Corridor and alternatives. Map 2a: Land cover and land use along the Aries Corridor and alternatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Photovoltaic Solar Plant on the Farm Rooipad No. 15 Near Augrabies, Northern Cape Province
    PALAEONTOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT: RECOMMENDED EXEMPTION FROM FURTHER PALAEONTOLOGICAL STUDIES Proposed Photovoltaic Solar Plant on the Farm Rooipad No. 15 near Augrabies, Northern Cape Province John E. Almond PhD (Cantab.) Natura Viva cc, PO Box 12410 Mill Street, Cape Town 8010, RSA [email protected] February 2012 Executive summary The proposed small solar plant development near Augrabies, 2 to 5 km south of the River Orange, Northern Cape, is underlain by (1) ancient Precambrian igneous and metamorphic bedrocks that do not contain fossils as well as (2) sparsely fossiliferous or unfossiliferous superficial sediments of probable Quaternary to Recent age. In view of the very low palaeontological sensitivity of the study region, no further specialist studies or mitigation are considered necessary for this project as far as fossil heritage is concerned. Neither of the alternative development options is preferred on palaeontological heritage grounds. However, should substantial fossil remains ( e.g. vertebrate bones and teeth) be encountered during construction, the responsible ECO should inform SAHRA at the earliest opportunity to consider possible mitigation measures. 1. Project description The company Mulilo Renewable Energy Pty Ltd is proposing to construct a 10 Megawatt Photovoltaic (PV) Solar Energy Generation Facility close to the Blouputs Electrical substation near Augrabies in the Kai! Garib Local Municipal area (Siyanda District Municipality) Northern Cape Province. The study area on Portion 9 of the Farm Rooipad No. 15 is located about 37 km northwest of the small town of Kakamas, just north of the R359 tar road and within 2 to 5 km of the Orange River (Fig. 1). The proposed solar generation facility would consist of an array of black coloured panels up to three metres high covering an area of less than 20 hectares.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Aid South Africa Annual Report 2017/18
    TAKING ACTION TO MAKE HUMAN RIGHTS A REALITY EVERY DAY INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT 2017-2018 VISION VISION A SOUTH AFRICA IN WHICH THE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ENSHRINED IN THE CONSTITUTION ARE REALISED TO ENSURE EQUALITY, JUSTICE AND A BETTER LIFE FOR ALL. MISSION MISSION TO BE THE LEADER IN THE PROVISION OF ACCESSIBLE, SUSTAINABLE, ETHICAL, QUALITY AND INDEPENDENT LEGAL SERVICES TO THE POOR AND VULNERABLE. VALUES VALUES • PASSION FOR JUSTICE AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS • UBUNTU • INTEGRITY • ACCOUNTABILITY • SERVICE EXCELLENCE • PEOPLE CENTRED SUSTAINABLE 2017-2018 REPORT ANNUAL INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT GOAL 16 TARGET 16.3 LEGAL AID SOUTH AFRICA Promote the rule of law at the national 1 and international levels, and ensure equal access to justice for all NATIONAL FOOTPRINT LEGAL AID SA INFRASTRUCTURE LEGAL AID SA NATIONAL FOOTPRINT Musina Local Offices Makhado Thohoyandou Mozambique 64 Soshanguve Bochum Giyani NORTH WEST Pretoria Lephalale LIMPOPO Polokwane Tzaneen Phalaborwa GAUTENG Modimolle Mokopane Tembisa Lebowakgomo Satellite Offices Krugersdorp N1 Burgersfort Alexandra MPUMALANGA 64 Johannesburg Benoni Bushbuckridge Germiston Botswana Siyabuswa Soweto Nigel Groblersdal Westonaria Nelspruit N4 Ga-Rankuwa Heidelberg Kwa-Mhlanga N4 Vereeniging Witbank Tonga Provincial Offices Mafikeng Rustenburg Middelburg 6 Lichtenburg GAUTENG Eerstehoek NORTH WEST MPUMALANGA Delareyville Carletonville Ermelo Swaziland Potchefstroom Secunda Vryburg Namibia Klerksdorp Piet Retief Standerton N2 Ingwavuma Kuruman Wolmaransstad Frankfort National
    [Show full text]
  • A Diesel Smell in the Dust
    GRAVEL TRAVEL NORTHERN CAPE Adiesel smell in the dust Between Namaqualand and the Kalahari you can get into cruise mode on deserted gravel roads. Forests of quiver trees wereflowering when Johan de Smidt drove three long gravel stretches between Loeriesfontein and Upington. JOHAN DE SMIDT photographs Hit the (dirt) road, Jack. Road signs like this one spell an escape from traffic. This one is near the start of Snakes alive –it’saforest! The quiver tree forest near Kenhardt is your chance to have aclose look at these iconic trees. Just watch out for snakes, though. amore than hour-long good gravel drive from Loeriesfontein. bring my goats and sheep to graze flowing with the Gariep.There hasn’t On the wayto Brandvlei we sawsome on the map looks like ashortcut gravel the dryseason. We stop to look anyway, here in the hills along the Gariep been another vehicle in sight for kilome- die-hard little flowers and near Kenhardt road between his town and Kakamas butdon’tknowwhatitis. because fodder is too expensive.” tre after dusty kilometre. we were surprised by aquiver tree forest is arutted stretch from hell. We should But if someone spies something Life on the edge under the The RockeryRoute is the third where Vanessa almost stood on aviper. rather take the much better R357 to thatbegins with a“p” near yetanother Fast facts E a s y ‘INorthernCape sun has lined the face greatgravel stretch we’vetravelled But it’shere, next to the languid Gariep, Brandvlei and then head north on the medium-sized grey bird of prey on a of Cornelius Coetzee.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Cultural Resources
    Cultural heritage impact assessment for the PROPOSED HOTEL DEVELOPMENT ON A SECTION OF THE FARM KAKAMAS SUID 28, MARCHAND, KAI !GARIB MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment Hotel Development, Marchand CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED HOTEL DEVELOPMENT ON A SECTION OF THE FARM KAKAMAS SUID 28, MARCHAND, KAI !GARIB MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Report No: 2014/JvS/039 Status: Final Revision No: 0 Date: July 2014 Prepared for: MEG Omgewingsimpakstudies Representative: Ms Marquerite Geldenhuys Postal Address: Private Bag X5879, Postnet Suite 63, Upington, 8800 Tel: (054) 491 3144 E-mail: [email protected] Prepared by: J van Schalkwyk (D Litt et Phil), Heritage Consultant ASAPA Registration No.: 168 Principal Investigator: Iron Age, Colonial Period, Industrial Heritage Postal Address: 62 Coetzer Avenue, Monument Park, 0181 Mobile: 076 790 6777 Fax: 012 347 7270 E-mail: [email protected] Declaration: I, J.A. van Schalkwyk, declare that I do not have any financial or personal interest in the proposed development, nor its developers or any of their subsidiaries, apart from the provision of heritage assessment and management services. J A van Schalkwyk (D Litt et Phil) Heritage Consultant July 2014 ii Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment Hotel Development, Marchand EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED HOTEL DEVELOPMENT ON A SECTION OF THE FARM KAKAMAS SUID 28, MARCHAND, KAI !GARIB MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE It is proposed to develop a hotel on a section of land located southeast of the hamlet of Marchand in the Northern Cape Province. In accordance with Section 38 of the NHRA, an independent heritage consultant was appointed by MEG Omgewingsimpakstudies to conduct a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) to determine if any sites, features or objects of cultural heritage significance occur within the boundaries of the area where it is planned to develop the hotel.
    [Show full text]
  • Straussheim Solar Pv Power Projects Traffic Impact
    Portion 1 of the Farm N'Rougas Zuid No 121, Kenhardt 7/9, STRAUSSHEIM SOLAR PV POWER PROJECTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT MAY 2016 Project: 7051.02 PO Box 25054, Langenhoven Park, 9330, 12 AG Visser Street, Langenhoven Park, Bloemfontein Tel & Fax: 051 446 2647, Cell: 083 381 5884, E-mail: [email protected] REPORT SHEET Property Description: Portion 1 of the Farm N'Rougas Zuid No 121, Kenhardt. Municipal Area: ZF Mgcawu District Municipality Application: Type of Report: Traffic Impact Assessment Project Number: 7051.02 Declaration I, Koot Marais, author of this study, hereby certify that I am a professional traffic engineer (registration No 920023) and that I have the required experience and training in the field of traffic and transportation engineering as required by the Engineering Council of South Africa (ECSA), to compile traffic impact studies and I take full responsibility for the content, including all calculations, conclusions and recommendations made herein. Compiled By: Koot Marais Pr Eng Signed: Date: May 2016 PREPARED BY: ` 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 1 INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 Aim of the Study 4 1.2 Background 4 1.3 Site Location 5 1.4 Development 6 1.5 Scope of Analysis 7 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 8 2.1 Existing Road Network 8 2.2 Road Planning 9 3 TRIP GENERATION & CAPACITY CONSIDERATIONS 10 4 ACCESS 12 4.1 Access at Position A 13 4.1.1 Location and Spacing of Access 14 4.2 Access at Position B 15 4.2.1 Road Classification 16 4.2.2 Location and Spacing of Access 17 4.2.3 Sight Distances 18 4.2.4 Access Layout 19 4.3 Summary 20 5 INTERNAL ROADS 21 6 EXTERNAL ROUTES 22 6.1 Possible Routes 22 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Basic Assessment Report
    DRAFT BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT for SHRUBLAND PV On RE Farm Geel Kop Farm No 456. In terms of the National Environmental Management Act (Act No. 107 of 1998, as amended) & 2014 Environmental Impact Regulations Prepared for Applicant: Shrubland PV (Pty) Ltd. Date: 06 July 2020 Author of Report: Dale Holder Author Email: [email protected] Report Reference: KAI632/14 Department Reference: To be allocated Case Officer: Click here to enter Case Officer Name DOCUMENT TRACKING DOCUMENT HISTORY REVISION DATE AUTHOR Draft Basic Assessment Report 06 July 2020 Dale Holder Final Basic Assessment Report Pending Dale Holder Draft Environmental Management 06 July 2020 Dale Holder Programme Final Environmental Management Pending Dale Holder Programme APPROVAL FOR RELEASE NAME TITLE SIGNATURE Dale Holder Senior Environmental Practitioner DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION LIST Department of Environmental Affairs Shrubland PV (Pty) Ltd Registered and Potential I&AP’s SUBMISSION AND CORRESPONDENCE SUBMISSION / CORRESPONDENCE DATE Application form Submitted 06 July 2020 Application form Acknowledged Pending Draft Basic Assessment Report Submitted 06 July 2020 Draft Basic Assessment Report Acknowledged Pending Comment on Draft Basic Assessment Report Pending Final Basic Assessment Report Submitted Pending APPOINTED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PRACTITIONER: Cape EAPrac Environmental Assessment Practitioners PO Box 2070 George 6530 Tel: 044-874 0365 Fax: 044-874 0432 Report written & compiled by: Dale Holder (Ndip Nature Conservation), who has over 15 years’ experience as an environmental practitioner. Registrations: Director, Louise-Mari van Zyl (MA Geography & Environmental Science [US]; Registered Environmental Assessment Practitioner with the Interim Certification Board for Environmental Assessment Practitioners of South Africa, EAPSA). Ms van Zyl has over fifteen years’ experience as an environmental practitioner.
    [Show full text]