DOCSLIB.ORG

Romans, Egyptians, and Crocodiles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Romans, Egyptians, and Crocodiles Romans, Egyptians, and Crocodiles R h O D R i L E W i S hE PLACES iN WhiCh ShAKESPEARE DEPARTS FROM, elaborates, or rewrites This Plutarchan original provide Antony and Cleopatra not only with its most distinctive characteristics but also with much of its artistic force. The scene on Pompey’s galley is a striking case in point. For Plutarch, it is noteworthy for Pompey’s refusal to heed Menas’s urging that he should seize the opportunity to assassinate Octavius Caesar, Mark Antony, and Lepidus so that he can assume power in their stead.1 Shakespeare retains Plutarch’s narrative outline but offers a much more detailed depiction of the moment that Menas would have Pompey exploit. Perhaps the most celebrated feature of this depiction is the exchange between Lepidus and Antony on what the Nile crocodile is “like.” in what fol- lows, i look afresh at the sources and analogs of this curious reptile, and use them as a tool with which to reconsider the apparent collision between the Roman and Egyptian world views that shapes so much of Shakespeare’s play. The central point, i take it, is that nobody on Pompey’s galley is interested in crocodiles as anything other than a token whose currency has been determined by the value assigned to it within the moral and political economy of Rome. in advancing this interpretation, i would also like to affirm something fundamentally Erasmian about the ways in which Shakespeare uses his source material. his sharp-eyed and assimilative genius did not read for guidance or instruction but instead for what Erasmus called the insigne verbum—the unusual word, image, or phrase that might be put to work within one’s own compositions.2 Sincere thanks to Leonard Barkan, Marisa Bass, Natalya Din-Kariuki, Will Poole, Namratha Rao, Quentin Skinner, and Nigel Smith for commenting on drafts of this essay. To access sup- plemental material for this essay, visit sq.folger.edu. 1 For the traditions to which Antony and Cleopatra responds, see Geoffrey Bullough, Narra- tive and Dramatic Sources of Shakespeare, 8 vols. (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1957–75), 5:215–449; A New Variorum Edition of Shakespeare: Antony and Cleopatra, ed. Marvin Spevack et al. ([New York]: Modern Language Association of America, 1990), 384–611. 2 On the insigne verbum, see Erasmus’s De ratione studii (1511), in Collected Works of Erasmus, ed. R. A. B. Mynors, Robert D. Sider, J. K. Sowards, Craig R. Thompson, et al., 86 vols. (Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1974–), 24:670. See also De copia (1512), 1.8, 1.9, in Erasmus, Collected Works, 24:302, 303. Shakespeare Quarterly 68.4 (2017): 320–350 © 2018 Folger Shakespeare Library ROMANS, EGYPTiANS, AND CROCODiLES 321 We should begin by revisiting the action as it unfolds on Pompey’s galley. The triumvirs are drinking to celebrate the peace. Antony is feeling the effects of the grape, and Lepidus is getting pitifully drunk. The conversation settles on Egypt, whence Antony has recently returned and which neither Lepidus nor Octavius has visited. We first hear Antony providing a complex answer to a question about measuring the level of the Nile and about the agricultural benefits of its flood (2.7.17–23).3 Lepidus then moves on to Egyptian “serpents” (l. 24) and asks for confirmation of the Ovidian commonplace that they are “bred . of your mud by the operation of your sun” (ll. 26–27).4 Lepidus’s “your” is supposed to indicate the condition of belonging to a group (i.e., the class of things Egyptian), but unfortunately for him it sounds like a tactless deployment of the second person genitive.5 Antony has recently reasserted his allegiance to Rome by mar- rying Octavia, and he does not want to have Egypt insinuated as in some sense “his” by someone he has long regarded as an irritating lightweight.6 Particularly because Lepidus’s language closely resembles that in which Antony himself con- trasted Egypt and Rome earlier in the play: unlike “the wide arch / Of the ranged empire,” in Egypt “Our dungy earth alike / Feeds beast as man” (1.1.34–35, 36–37). in any case, Antony’s reply begins to suggest impatience: “They are so” (2.7.28). Glasses are refilled; more drink is taken. Lepidus asks about pyramids (which he botches as “pyramises” [l. 35]) and, after receiving no answer from Antony, fixes on crocodiles: “What manner o’ thing is your crocodile?” (l. 41). in response, Antony turns to prose to articulate something between displeasure and disdain. Lepidus fails to notice; in an aside, Octavius cannot conceal his incredulity at the fact; Antony reassures Octavius that Lepidus is drunk enough to swallow anything. The exchange demands to be quoted in full: ANTONY it is shaped, sir, like itself, and it is as broad as it hath breadth. it is just so high as it is, and moves with it own organs. it lives by that which nourisheth it, and the ele- ments once out of it, it transmigrates. LEPiDUS What colour is it of? ANTONY Of it own colour too. 3 Unless otherwise noted, quotations from Shakespeare derive from Antony and Cleopatra, ed. John Wilders (London: Arden, 1995), cited parenthetically. 4 See Ovid, Metamorphoses, ed. R. J. Tarrant (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004), 1.422–37, p. 17. Cf., e.g., Edmund Spenser, The Faerie Queene, ed. A. C. hamilton et al. (London: Longman, 2007), 1.1.21; “Satyre 4,” in The Complete Poems of John Donne, ed. Robin Robbins (London: Longman, 2010), ll. 18–19, p. 399. 5 Cf., e.g., “your four negatives make your two affirmatives,” in Twelfth Night, ed. Keir Elam (London: Arden, 2008), 5.1.19; and see further Kathleen M. Wales, “Generic ‘Your’ and Jacobean Drama: The Rise and Fall of a Pronominal Usage,” English Studies 66.1 (1985): 7–24. 6 On Antony’s disregard for “This . slight unmeritable man,” see Julius Caesar, ed. David Daniell (London: Arden, 1998), 4.1.12–40. 322 ShAKESPEARE QUARTERLY LEPiDUS ’Tis a strange serpent. ANTONY ’Tis so, and the tears of it are wet. OCTAViUS Will this description satisfy him? ANTONY With the health that Pompey gives him, else he is a very epicure. (ll. 42–53) Antony insults Lepidus with flagrant tautologies and conveys no information about the crocodile other than the facetiously exotic claim—again, derived from Ovid—that it “transmigrates” after death, and an affirmation that its prover- bially deceptive tears are “wet.”7 Octavius takes no interest in the substance of what has been said, and the conversation is abandoned to more wine and song. Before long, Lepidus has to be carried offstage, and Octavius decrees that they are wasting their time: Our graver business Frowns at this levity. What needs more words? Good night. (ll. 120–25) What of the crocodile? As Janet Adelman notes, it is an animal whose appear- ance has “all the complexity of the historical tradition.” She continues, “What we do with so mutable a beast must be left to our critical discretion.”8 To any reader of Spenser’s Faerie Queene (1596), her point is uncontroversial. For Spenser, crocodiles can emblematize guile, tyranny, lust, cruelty, hypocrisy, justice, uxori- ousness, forcefulness, providential foresight, and even the sun.9 Furthermore, authors since Cicero had suggested that the ancient Egyptians invested croco- diles with a dizzying range of meanings of their own, many of them divine.10 7 Ovid, Metamorphoses, 15.143–75, pp. 451–52. See further Leonard Barkan, The Gods Made Flesh: Metamorphosis and the Pursuit of Paganism (New haven, CT: Yale UP, 1986), 86–87. 8 Janet Adelman, The Common Liar: An Essay on Antony and Cleopatra (New haven, CT: Yale UP, 1973), 61, 62. 9 Spenser, Faerie Queene, 5.7.6–16. See further Jane Aptekar, Icons of Justice: Iconography and Thematic Imagination in Book V of “The Faerie Queene” (New York: Columbia UP, 1969), 87–107. For an introduction to early modern crocodiliana, see Spencer J. Weinreich, “Thinking with Crocodiles: An iconic Animal at the intersection of Early Modern Religion and Natural Philosophy,” Early Science and Medicine 20.3 (2015): 209–40. See also hans Gossen and August Steier, “Krokodile und Eidechsen,” in Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswis- senschaft, ed. A. F. von Pauly, Georg Wissowa, et al., 1st ser. (Stuttgart, Ger.: J. B. Metzler Verlag, 1893–1980), vol. 11.2, cols. 1947–70. 10 See, e.g., Cicero, Tusculanae disputationes, ed. Otto heine and Max Pohlenz, 2 vols. (Berlin: Teubner, 1912–22), 5.78–79 (vol. 2, pp. 139–40); Cicero, De natura deorum, ed. Arthur Stan- ley Pease, 2 vols. (Cambridge, MA: harvard UP, 1955), 1.29.82 (vol. 1, pp. 413–16), 3.19.47–48 (vol. 2, pp. 1075–76); Plutarch, Moralia, ed. Curtius hubert et al.,7 vols. (Leipzig, ROMANS, EGYPTiANS, AND CROCODiLES 323 Even so, it is possible to be a lot more precise in probing the significance that Antony’s crocodile might have had for Shakespeare’s first readers and auditors. For example, Quintilian—familiar to any early modern who had made it as far as grammar school—advises that logical games like paradoxes can help to remind the would-be orator that he should attend to every detail of his words. One of these involves an Egyptian crocodile that promises to return a son to his mother if the mother can correctly state what the crocodile will do with her son. She responds that the crocodile will not return her son to her, and, although the answer is truthful, the crocodile refuses to honor its word on the grounds that returning the child would give the lie to the mother’s utterance.11 Crocodilites, or the crocodile’s argument, would retain its place in writing on logic and rhetoric throughout the early modern period, and testified to the importance of keeping your wits both trained and about you.12 There is no struggle to hear an echo of it in the way that Antony treats Lepidus’s drunken witlessness.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stasis-Theory in Homeric Commentary
    This is a repository copy of Stasis-theory in Homeric commentary . White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/390/ Article: Heath, M. (1993) Stasis-theory in Homeric commentary. Mnemosyne, 46 (3). pp. 356-363. ISSN 0026-7074 Reuse See Attached Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Mnemosyne 46 (1993), 356-63 St£sij-theory in Homeric commentary Malcolm Heath University of Leeds ABSTRACT: (i) Analysis of the small number of references to the rhetorical theory of stasis (issue-theory) in the Homeric scholia shows that they assume a modified version of the theory of Athenaeus, a contemporary and rival of Hermagoras of Temnos. (ii) In his discussion of Agamemnon's speech in Iliad 3.456-60 Eustathius follows the discussion in Plutarch Quaestiones convivales 9.13, rather than that in the scholia. It is shown that this is justified on technical grounds. The interpretation in the scholia does not fit Agamemnon's speech, and must have originated in a discussion of the attested Homeric 'problem' concerning claims that the Trojans had broken their oath. I The sporadic references to st£sij-theory in the scholia to the Iliad employ an unusual terminology.1 The following terms are found: (A1) parormhtik» (9.228; 23.594); (A2) katastocastik» (18.497-8); (A3) ¢lloiwtik» (1.118; 8.424; 9.228, 312-3), of which tÕ ØpallaktikÒn is a part (9.228); (A4) dikaiologik» (23.594);2 (A5) ·htÕn kaˆ di£noia (3.457).
    [Show full text]
  • Study Guide 2016-2017
    Study Guide 2016-2017 by William Shakespeare Standards Theatre English Language Arts Social Studies TH.68.C.2.4: Defend personal responses. LAFS.68.RH.1.2: Determine central ideas. SS.912.H.1.5: Examine social issues. TH.68.C.3.1: Discuss design elements. LAFS.910.L.3.4: Determine unknown words. TH.68.H.1.5: Describe personal responses. LAFS.910.L.3.5: Demonstrate figurative language. TH.912.S.1.8: Use research to extract clues. LAFS.1112.SL.1.1: Initiate collaborative discussions. TH.912.S.2.9: Research artistic choices. TH.912.H.1.4: Interpret through historical lenses. Content Advisory: Antony and Cleopatra is a political drama fueled by intimate relationships. There are battle scenes. If it were a movie, Antony and Cleopatra would be rated “PG-13.” !1 Antony and Cleopatra Table of Contents Introduction p. 3 Enjoying Live Theater p. 3 About the Play p. 6 Plot Summary p. 6 Meet the Characters p. 7 Meet the Playwright p. 8 Historical Context p. 11 Elizabethan Theater p. 11 Activities p. 12 Themes and Discussion p. 17 Bibliography p. 17 !2 Antony and Cleopatra An Introduction Educators: Thank you for taking the time out of your very busy schedule to bring the joy of theatre arts to your classroom. We at Orlando Shakes are well aware of the demands on your time and it is our goal to offer you supplemental information to compliment your curriculum with ease and expediency. What’s New? Lots! First, let me take a moment to introduce our new Children’s Series Coordinator, Brandon Yagel.
    [Show full text]
  • Latin Criticism of the Early Empire Pp
    Cambridge Histories Online http://universitypublishingonline.org/cambridge/histories/ The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism Edited by George Alexander Kennedy Book DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300063 Online ISBN: 9781139055338 Hardback ISBN: 9780521300063 Paperback ISBN: 9780521317177 Chapter 9 - Latin Criticism of the Early Empire pp. 274-296 Chapter DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521300063.010 Cambridge University Press LATIN CRITICISM OF THE EARLY EMPIRE The name 'Silver Latin' is often given to the literature of the first century of the Christian era and is generally understood to imply its inferiority to the Golden Age of the late Republic and Augustan era. Analogy with the five Hesiodic ages, in which the silver age was both later and less worthy than the golden, suggests the cliche of decline. To what extent did the Romans of the early imperial period feel that they and their contemporaries were a falling away from the previous generation? We will see that the change in form of government, by denying opportunities for significant political speech, trivialised the art of oratory. But was there any such external constraint on poetry? Modern critics have reproached Silver Latin epic and tragedy with being 'rhetorical'. Certainly it is clear from Tacitus' Dialogus that men thwarted from political expression transferred to the safer vehicle of historical or mythical poetry both the techniques and ideals of public oratory. But just as no one suggests that Juvenal's satires were poorer compositions because of his apparent rhetorical skill, so rhetorical colouring in the higher poetic genres of tragedy and epic is not necessarily a fault.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Library of Liberty: Shakespeare's Plutarch, Vol. 2
    The Online Library of Liberty A Project Of Liberty Fund, Inc. Plutarch, Shakespeare’s Plutarch, Vol. 2 (containing the main sources of Anthony and Cleopatra and of Coriolanus) [1579] The Online Library Of Liberty This E-Book (PDF format) is published by Liberty Fund, Inc., a private, non-profit, educational foundation established in 1960 to encourage study of the ideal of a society of free and responsible individuals. 2010 was the 50th anniversary year of the founding of Liberty Fund. It is part of the Online Library of Liberty web site http://oll.libertyfund.org, which was established in 2004 in order to further the educational goals of Liberty Fund, Inc. To find out more about the author or title, to use the site's powerful search engine, to see other titles in other formats (HTML, facsimile PDF), or to make use of the hundreds of essays, educational aids, and study guides, please visit the OLL web site. This title is also part of the Portable Library of Liberty DVD which contains over 1,000 books and quotes about liberty and power, and is available free of charge upon request. The cuneiform inscription that appears in the logo and serves as a design element in all Liberty Fund books and web sites is the earliest-known written appearance of the word “freedom” (amagi), or “liberty.” It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash, in present day Iraq. To find out more about Liberty Fund, Inc., or the Online Library of Liberty Project, please contact the Director at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION Livy the Historian Livy , or in full Titus Livius, was born at Patavium in northern Italy (Padua today) in 59 bc, and so lived through the turbulent years of the fall of the Roman Republic into the calm and politically controlled era of one-man rule under Augustus and his successor Tiberius. 1 According to St Jerome’s Chronicle he died in ad 17. He seems not to have held public offi ce or done any military service. Apart from some essays, now lost, on philosophy and rhetoric, he undertook in his late twenties to compose an up-to-date history of Rome drawing on mostly Roman but also some Greek predecessors. He entitled it From the Foundation of the City ( Ab Urbe Condita ): to all Romans their City was unique. The history eventually amounted to 142 books, taking Rome’s history from its traditional foundation-date of 753 bc down to the year 9 bc — a colossal achievement, much lengthier than Gibbon’s Decline and Fall , for instance. Of it only the fi rst ten Books and then Books 21–45 survive. Books 6–10 take the story of Rome from 390 bc down to the year 293. Evidence in the work indicates that Livy began writing in the early 20s bc, for around 18 bc he reached Book 28. A subheading to a surviving résumé (epitome) of the lost book 121 states that it was published after Augustus’ death in ad 14: some- thing that probably held true, too, for those that followed. The his- tory ended at the year 9 bc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sophistic Roman: Education and Status in Quintilian, Tacitus and Pliny Brandon F. Jones a Dissertation Submitted in Partial
    The Sophistic Roman: Education and Status in Quintilian, Tacitus and Pliny Brandon F. Jones A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2015 Reading Committee: Alain Gowing, Chair Catherine Connors Alexander Hollmann Deborah Kamen Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Classics ©Copyright 2015 Brandon F. Jones University of Washington Abstract The Sophistic Roman: Education and Status in Quintilian, Tacitus and Pliny Brandon F. Jones Chair of Supervisory Commitee: Professor Alain Gowing Department of Classics This study is about the construction of identity and self-promotion of status by means of elite education during the first and second centuries CE, a cultural and historical period termed by many as the Second Sophistic. Though the Second Sophistic has traditionally been treated as a Greek cultural movement, individual Romans also viewed engagement with a past, Greek or otherwise, as a way of displaying education and authority, and, thereby, of promoting status. Readings of the work of Quintilian, Tacitus and Pliny, first- and second-century Latin prose authors, reveal a remarkable engagement with the methodologies and motivations employed by their Greek contemporaries—Dio of Prusa, Plutarch, Lucian and Philostratus, most particularly. The first two chapters of this study illustrate and explain the centrality of Greek in the Roman educational system. The final three chapters focus on Roman displays of that acquired Greek paideia in language, literature and oratory, respectively. As these chapters demonstrate, the social practices of paideia and their deployment were a multi-cultural phenomenon. Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................... 2 Introduction ....................................................................................... 4 Chapter One.
    [Show full text]
  • Pliny, the Eruption of Vesuvius
    CSCP Support Materials: Notes and Commentary Eduqas GCSE Latin Component 3A Latin Literature (Narratives) Pliny, The Eruption of Vesuvius For examination in 2020 and 2021 PUBLISHED BY THE CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL CLASSICS PROJECT Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, 184 Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 8PQ, UK http://www.CambridgeSCP.com © University of Cambridge School Classics Project, 2019 Copyright In the case of this publication, the CSCP is waiving normal copyright provisions in that copies of this material may be made free of charge and without specific permission so long as they are for educational or personal use within the school or institution which downloads the publication. All other forms of copying (for example, for inclusion in another publication) are subject to specific permission from the Project. Image Acknowledgments Image on pg. 9 ‘Vesuvius Looms’ courtesy of Paull Young [http://www.flickr.com/photos/paullyoung/429923584/in/photostream/] Images on pg. 15 courtesy of Big Albert [https://www.flickr.com/photos/52948047@N05/24356049443] and Andrea Schaffer from Sydney, Australia [CC BY 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)] Image on pg. 26 courtesy of Wellcome Images [CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)] All other images taken from Cambridge Latin Course resources. First published 2019 version date: 14/08/2019 Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 Pliny the Younger ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Educational Theory of Plutarch
    A\. U. C. t A. <h. JC. DEPT. THE LffiRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive in 2007 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/educationaltlieorOOwestiala THE EDUCATIONAL THEORY OF PLUTARCH PQR REVIEW THE EDUCATIONAL THEORY OF PLUTARCH K. M. WESTAWAY, D.Lit. (Lond.) STAFF LECTURER IN CLASSICS, ROYAL HOLLOWAY COLLEGE FORMERLY CLASSICAL SCHOLAR, AND LATER MARION KENNEDY STUDENT, OF NEWNHAM COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE LONDON UNIVERSITY OF LONDON PRESS, LTD. 17 WARWICK SQUARE, E.C.4 1922 U. C. L. A. EDUC. DEPT. U. C. L A. EDLC. DEPT. Education library LB ovroi KOt KoivQ ^vcX^dvT€? airap^v T^ <to^hxk aviOtfTov Tw 'AttoAAwvi cts rof vcwv tov iv ^€\<t}OLS, ypd.\j/avT€9 ravra, a 5^ ttoitcs v/avowii', yvwdi crauTov Kai firfiev ayav, Plato, ProtagoraSy 343 B. opa §€ KOt Tttin"! Ttt irpoypd/xfJuiTa, to 'yvto^i cravTov' Kai to ^/ir)8eva.yav.' oaa^^rjTtj(T€i^ kckcVi/kc <fiiko<r6^ovs Koi o<rov Xoywv jrXrjOo'i &<f> cxaoTOV Kadairtp otto (rirepfxaTO^ avair€<f>VKev. Plutarch, Z)^ E apud Delpbos, 385 D. 827732 PREFACE The popularity of Plutarch as the author of the Parallel Lives has never really waned. It is thus surprising that the other half of his extant work, the essays generally called by the collective title of the Moralia, should for long periods together be almost unread and unremembered. I have found in these essays an interest even greater than I had been led to expect from my love of the " Lives." In the Moralia Plutarch, the philosopher, the priest, the citizen, the father, reveals himself with an intimacy rare among the ancient Greeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Pliny Does Not Write History (Ep
    A Curious Case: Pliny Does Not Write History (Ep. 5.8) Jonathan J. Price Pliny the Younger admired historians and historical writing. In his letters he praises History‘s virtues, values a freedman who can read history well, and above all, feels unbounded esteem for his friend Tacitus, who had gained fame while still alive for his published historical researches.1 Pliny‘s most elaborate appreciation of historiography is contained in Ep. 5.8, a letter of 105-106 CE2 addressed to Titinius Capito, who had urged Pliny to write history himself. Pliny responds to Capito by lauding history-writing as the surest means to fame and affirming his desire to take up the task, but his convoluted and confusing explanation of the reasons for his delay amount to a decisive rejection of ever writing history. The letter has been variously understood as a serious contemplation on historiography, a document of angst about his status in Rome‘s literary world, a bid to make himself the subject of history, an urbane ‗polite refusal‘ to write history.3 This paper, offered in honor of my friend and colleague Hannah Cotton,4 will argue that the letter is a subtle but demonstrative rejection of history-writing which both reflects and comments on the state of Roman historiography in Pliny‘s generation. Pliny‘s correspondent, the equestrian Cn. Octavius Titinius Capito, was a generous literary patron and the host of a well-known salon, apparently an arbiter of taste in Rome in the early second century CE.5 After a military career, he served as procurator ab * I would like to thank Werner Eck for helpful criticism.
    [Show full text]
  • Antony and Cleopatra Mark Antony
    Antony and Cleopatra Mark Antony – one of the Triumviri of Rome along with Octavius Caesar and Aemilius Lepidus – has neglected his soldierly duties after being beguiled by Egypt's Queen, Cleopatra. He ignores Rome's domestic problems, including the fact that his wife, Fulvia, rebelled against Octavius, and then died. Octavius calls Antony back to Rome from Alexandria in order to help him fight against Pompey (Sextus Pompeius), Menecrates, and Menas, three notorious pirates of the Mediterranean. At Alexandria, Cleopatra begs Antony not to go, and though he repeatedly affirms his love for her, he eventually leaves. Back in Rome, Agrippa brings forward the idea that Antony should marry Octavius Caesar's sister, Octavia, in order to cement the bond between the two men. Antony's lieutenant Enobarbus, though, knows that Octavia can never satisfy him after Cleopatra. In a famous passage, he delineates Cleopatra's charms in paradoxical terms: "Age cannot wither her, nor custom stale / Her infinite variety: other women cloy / The appetites they feed, but she makes hungry / Where most she satisfies." A soothsayer warns Antony that he is sure to lose if he ever tries to fight Octavius. In Egypt, Cleopatra learns of Antony's marriage, and takes furious revenge upon the messenger that brings her the news. She grows content only when her courtiers assure her that Octavia is homely by Elizabethan standards: short, low-browed, round-faced and with bad hair. At a confrontation, the triumvirs parley with Pompey, and offer him a truce. He can retain Sicily and Sardinia, but he must help them "rid the sea of pirates" and send them tributes.
    [Show full text]
  • Quintilian's Educational Theories
    r 4 ARMITAGE Quintilian's Hducational Theories Latin 1901 if* jr;-.. IT JEKAI^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^-^ ^ ^ ^- ^ 4. 4- ^ 4^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ T^-^ 4. >pr , ^ ft- ^ If^- 'ir ^ -^^ ^- ^ 4. - ^- * - ^ 4 % 4 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^^^^^ ^ . ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 4_ # * ^- ' ^ . ^ LIBRARY t ^ ^ ^ ^ -^j,. ^. # # ^^.:^.r:^ University of Illinois. i^-,,.^ y^.- ,^ ^ I | "^^^ . ^ ^ CLASS. BOOK. VOLUME. ^ # iit- I Bt5 I Accession No. ' ^ ijfe^^ ^ # ^ ... -if^. 4 . ^ 4- 4. + + -f * + s|i 't^ ^ ^ 4". ^ Hts if^ . 4-- * ^ ^ ^ 'f ^ ^ ^ ^ 4^ ^ ^ ^ -ik ^ ^ ^ 4. 4. ^ ^ * ^ ^ "l^ 1^ - ^# ^< ^ 4 -^^ . 4w ^ ^ ^ 4 - ^ * "^---M ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ * ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ # 4 -4. 4. ^-^^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ , ^ ^ 4. ^ ^ ^ ^- -4. 4^ ^--^^^ .J^...., ^ ^ * ^ QUIIfPILIAirS ITOCATIONAL THEORIES. J. Howarcl AriTiita,:;ie. Thesis for the de.rrree of Bachelor of Arts in the Golle^qe of Literature and Arts in the University of Illinois. June 1901. (A UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS ii»o / THIS IS TO CEUTIFY THAT THB THE8IS PUEPAUEIJ UMDER MY SUPEH VISION HY EXTITLED 19 APPUOVETl m- ME AS FULFILLING TIIIS PART OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEG REE OF /L / HEAD OF DEPARTMENT OF S>^;5Jll CiC^*::^^ Quintilian's Mucational Theories, In order to obtain a more intelligent underatanding of the ed- ucational theories of Quintilian, it will he necesnar^^ to consider briefly thone earlier ideals upon which his system is based. Of the Chinese, Indian and Egyptian forms of education little is knovm and hence whatever effect they may have had upon latter system.s cannot be traced. With the Jewish forn.s, we are som.ewhat more fam.iliar. In the early history of the Jewish race, education was essentially domestic. During the whole biblical period there is no trace of public schools, at least for young pupils. Children were taught by their parents the moral precepts and religious beliefs of the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Quintilian and the Perception of the System of Poetic Genres in the Flavian Age
    1. QUINTILIAN AND THE PERCEPTION OF THE SYSTEM OF POETIC GENRES IN THE FLAVIAN AGE Mario Citroni Studies on Quintilian frequently contain the affirmation that we can- not consider the survey of Greek and Latin writers found in Book 10 of the Institutio oratoria as a chapter of literary criticism, properly speaking: we must realise—it is said—that this is a list which was cre- ated for the specific purposes of the teaching of rhetoric. The broad correspondence of the list of Greek authors with the one that was found in De imitatione, by Dionysius of Halicarnassus,1 which had the same purpose, seems to offer unequivocal confirmation of the fact that this survey belongs to an academic tradition, in which words of advice about books to read, together with judgements and comments, corre- spond to the precise educational purpose of pointing out the elements in every author which could be useful for the improvement of rhetori- cal style. In the case of the list of Latin authors, it is recognised that, in the absence of Greek sources, it probably reflects more authentically the attitudes and judgements of Quintilian and of the culture of his time, although the purpose remains unchanged. It is admitted by some scholars that the survey also includes reading advice and judgements which go beyond the mere purpose of the development of rhetorical style, and reveal a more specifically literary interest, or broader aims of a general cultural education; however, these concessions, which are 1 It was long believed that Dionysius was the direct source of Quintilian’s survey, up to Claussen 1872–3.
    [Show full text]