The Catalyst
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Geological Sukvey
DEPABTMENT OF THE IHTERIOE BULLETIN OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SUKVEY No. 148 WASHINGTON' G-OVEKNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1897 UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SUEYEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, 'DIRECTOR ANALYSES OF ROCKS ANALYTICAL METHODS LABORATORY OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 1880 to 1896 BY F. W. CLAEKE AND W. F. HILLEBEAND WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1897 CONTENTS. Pago. Introduction, by F. W. Clarke ....'.......................................... 9 Some principles and methods of analysis applied to silicate rocks; by W. F. Hillebrand................................................................ 15 Part I. Introduction ................................................... 15 Scope of the present paper .......................................... 20 Part II. Discussion of methods ..................................i....... 22 Preparation of sample....................:.......................... 22 Specific gravity. ............................: ......--.........--... 23 Weights of sample to be employed for analysis....................... 26 Water, hygroscopic ................................ ................. 26 Water, total or combined....... ^.................................... 30 Silica, alumina, iron, etc............................................ 34 Manganese, nickel, cobalt, copper, zinc.............................. 41 Calcium and strontium...................................... ........ 43 Magnesium......................................................... 43 Barium and titanium............... .... ............................ -
Highwood Mountains Range Analysis Project Area on Those Resources Affected by Implementation
United States Department of Agriculture Environmental Forest Service Assessment 2015 Highwood Mountains Range Judith Ranger District, Lewis and Clark National Forest Cascade, Choteau and Judith Basin Counties, Montana For More Information Contact: Lewis and Clark National Forest Judith Ranger District Standford, Montana www.fs.fed.us/r1/lewisclark/projects 406-566-2292. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Environmental Assessment Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................4 Location of the Proposed Project Area ..........................................................................................................4 -
2019 Montana Completed Projects
2019 MONTANA COMPLETED PROJECTS 76,880 $13,933,555 TOTAL ACRES MISSION IMPACT 2019 LAND P R O T E C T I O N & ACCESS IN 2019, WE PROTECTED 6,388 ACRES, PROVIDING ACCESS TO 47,416 ACRES VALUED AT $9,750,000 Acres Acres Reported Project Brief Project Details Protected Access Value Permanent land/access project along Rocky Mountain Front Falls Creek 442 27,001 $2,460,000 conveyed wildlife/riparian habitat to Helena-Lewis and Clark National Forest Expansion of land protection & public access complementing Tenderfoot Creek II 448 9,341 $980,000 8,220 acres of previous work in the vicinity, conveyed to Lewis and Clark National Forest Donation to RMEF that protects critical elk/mule deer/ Bearmouth 3,450 5,200 $2,760,000 whitetail winter range and riparian habitat Permanent land/access project along Rocky Mountain Front Green Mountain 620 2,056 $837,000 conveyed land to Helena-Lewis and Clark Natl Forest & benefits National Trails System Acquired & conveyed two inholdings featuring wildlife & Mill Creek Arrow Peak 470 1,595 riparian habitat to Gallatin Natl Forest west of Absaroka Beartooth Wilderness TENDERFOOT CREEK II FALLS CREEK GREEN MOUNTAIN LAND PROTECTION & ACCESS continued MOUNT HAGGIN Acres Acres Reported Project Brief Project Details Protected Access Value Multi-partner collarboration led to construction of a 2.7-mile Crazy Mountains - 0 1,265 trail opening access to Crazy Mountains, resolving long-time Porcupine - Ibex Trail I access disputes Important corridor for elk & other wildlife RMEF purchased Swan Range 638 638 $2,234,000 from a private landowner & conveyed to Lolo Natl Forest Dome Mountain WMA Addition Assisted partners with the purchase/conveyance of vital elk 160 160 (A. -
Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections. -
Wikipedia Beetles Dung Beetles Are Beetles That Feed on Feces
Wikipedia beetles Dung beetles are beetles that feed on feces. Some species of dung beetles can bury dung times their own mass in one night. Many dung beetles, known as rollers , roll dung into round balls, which are used as a food source or breeding chambers. Others, known as tunnelers , bury the dung wherever they find it. A third group, the dwellers , neither roll nor burrow: they simply live in manure. They are often attracted by the dung collected by burrowing owls. There are dung beetle species of different colours and sizes, and some functional traits such as body mass or biomass and leg length can have high levels of variability. All the species belong to the superfamily Scarabaeoidea , most of them to the subfamilies Scarabaeinae and Aphodiinae of the family Scarabaeidae scarab beetles. As most species of Scarabaeinae feed exclusively on feces, that subfamily is often dubbed true dung beetles. There are dung-feeding beetles which belong to other families, such as the Geotrupidae the earth-boring dung beetle. The Scarabaeinae alone comprises more than 5, species. The nocturnal African dung beetle Scarabaeus satyrus is one of the few known non-vertebrate animals that navigate and orient themselves using the Milky Way. Dung beetles are not a single taxonomic group; dung feeding is found in a number of families of beetles, so the behaviour cannot be assumed to have evolved only once. Dung beetles live in many habitats , including desert, grasslands and savannas , [9] farmlands , and native and planted forests. They are found on all continents except Antarctica. They eat the dung of herbivores and omnivores , and prefer that produced by the latter. -
Inactive Mines on Gallatin National Forest-Administered Land
Abandoned-Inactive Mines on Gallatin National Forest-AdministeredLand Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Abandoned-Inactive Mines Program Open-File Report MBMG 418 Phyllis A. Hargrave Michael D. Kerschen CatherineMcDonald JohnJ. Metesh PeterM. Norbeck RobertWintergerst Preparedfor the u.s. Departmentof Agriculture ForestService-Region 1 Abandoned-Inactive Mines on Gallatin National Forest-AdministeredLand Open-File Report 418 MBMG October 2000 Phyllis A. Hargrave Michael D. Kerschen Catherine McDonald John J. Metesh Peter M. Norbeck Robert Wintergerst for the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service-Region I Prepared Contents List of Figures .V List of Tables . VI IntToduction 1 1.IProjectObjectives 1 1.2AbandonedandInactiveMinesDefined 2 1.3 Health and Environmental Problems at Mines. 3 1.3.1 Acid-Mine Drainage 3 1.3.2 Solubilities of SelectedMetals 4 1.3.3 The Use of pH and SC to Identify Problems. 5 1.4Methodology. 6 1.4.1 Data Sources : 6 1.4.2Pre-Field Screening. 6 1.4.3Field Screening. 7 1.4.3.1 Collection of Geologic Samples. 9 1.4.4 Field Methods ' 9 1.4.4.1 Selection of Sample Sites 9 1.4.4.2 Collection of Water and Soil Samples. 10 1.4.4.3 Marking and Labeling Sample Sites. 10 1.4.4.4ExistingData 11 1.4.5 Analytical Methods """"""""""""""""'" 11 1.4.6Standards. 12 1.4.6.1Soil Standards. 12 1.4.6.2Water-QualityStandards 13 1.4.7 Analytical Results 13 1.5 Gallatin National Forest 14 1.5.1 History of Mining 16 1.5.1.1 Production 17 1.5.1.2Milling 18 1.6SummaryoftheGallatinNationaIForestInvestigat~on 19 1.7 Mining Districts and Drainages 20 Gallatin National Forest Drainages 20 2.1 Geology "' ' '..' ,.""...' ""." 20 2.2 EconomicGeology. -
Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks
Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Museum Management Plan Cultural Resources Pacific West Region January 2008 National Park Service U. S. Department of the Interior S o k u To Bishop ee t Piute Pass Cr h F 11423ft p o o 3482m r h k s S i o B u B i th G s h L o A p Pavilion Dome Mount C F 11846ft I E Goethe C ork R r S 3611m D I V 13264ft e a I D e n 4024m k E J Lake oa q Sabrina u McClure Meadow k r i n 9600ft o F 2926m e l d R d Mount Henry Mount i i v 12196ft e Darwin M 3717m r The Hermit 13830ft South L 12360ft 4215m E 3767m Lake Big Pine C G 3985ft DINKEY O O 1215m O P D Hell for Sure Pass E w o N D Mount V s 11297ft A O e t T R McGee n L LAKES 3443m D U s E 12969ft T 3953m I O C C o A N r N Mount Powell WILDERNESS r D B a Y A JOHN l 13361ft I O S V I R N N 4072m Big Bishop Pass Pin k i e Cree v I D e 11972ft r E 3649m C Mount Goddard L r E MUIR e 13568ft Muir Pass e C DUSY North Palisade k 4136m 11955ft O BASIN 3644m N 14242ft Black Giant T E 4341m 13330ft COURTRIGHT JOHN MUIR P Le Conte A WILDERNESS 4063m RESERVOIR L I Canyon S B Charybdis A 395 8720ft ir D Middle Palisade c 13091ft E h 2658m Mount Reinstein 14040ft 3990m C r WILDERNESS CR Cre e 12604ft A ek v ES 4279m i Blackcap 3842m N T R Mountain Y O an INYO d s E 11559ft P N N a g c ir i 3523m C u Tr f n M ail ic i H John K A e isad Creek C N Pal r W T e E s H G D t o D I T d E T E d V r WISHON G a IL a O r O i d S l RESERVOIR R C Mather Pass Split Mountain G R W Finger Peak A Amphitheater 14058ft E 12100ft G S Lake 4285m 12404ft 3688m E 3781m D N U IV P S I C P D E r E -
Glisan, Rodney L. Collection
Glisan, Rodney L. Collection Object ID VM1993.001.003 Scope & Content Series 3: The Outing Committee of the Multnomah Athletic Club sponsored hiking and climbing trips for its members. Rodney Glisan participated as a leader on some of these events. As many as 30 people participated on these hikes. They usually travelled by train to the vicinity of the trailhead, and then took motor coaches or private cars for the remainder of the way. Of the four hikes that are recorded Mount Saint Helens was the first climb undertaken by the Club. On the Beacon Rock hike Lower Hardy Falls on the nearby Hamilton Mountain trail were rechristened Rodney Falls in honor of the "mountaineer" Rodney Glisan. Trips included Mount Saint Helens Climb, July 4 and 5, 1915; Table Mountain Hike, November 14, 1915; Mount Adams Climb, July 1, 1916; and Beacon Rock Hike, November 4, 1917. Date 1915; 1916; 1917 People Allen, Art Blakney, Clem E. English, Nelson Evans, Bill Glisan, Rodney L. Griffin, Margaret Grilley, A.M. Jones, Frank I. Jones, Tom Klepper, Milton Reed Lee, John A. McNeil, Fred Hutchison Newell, Ben W. Ormandy, Jim Sammons, Edward C. Smedley, Georgian E. Stadter, Fred W. Thatcher, Guy Treichel, Chester Wolbers, Harry L. Subjects Adams, Mount (Wash.) Bird Creek Meadows Castle Rock (Wash.) Climbs--Mazamas--Saint Helens, Mount Eyrie Hell Roaring Canyon Mount Saint Helens--Photographs Multnomah Amatuer Athletic Association Spirit Lake (Wash.) Table Mountain--Columbia River Gorge (Wash.) Trout Lake (Wash.) Creator Glisan, Rodney L. Container List 07 05 Mt. St. Helens Climb, July 4-5,1915 News clipping. -
The Leadership Catalyst: a New Paradigm for Helping Leadership Flourish in Organizations
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Master of Science in Organizational Dynamics Theses Organizational Dynamics Programs 5-1-2011 The Leadership Catalyst: A New Paradigm for Helping Leadership Flourish in Organizations Kevin M. Zachery University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/od_theses_msod Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, and the Nonprofit Administration and Management Commons Zachery, Kevin M., "The Leadership Catalyst: A New Paradigm for Helping Leadership Flourish in Organizations" (2011). Master of Science in Organizational Dynamics Theses. 65. https://repository.upenn.edu/od_theses_msod/65 Submitted to the Program of Organizational Dynamics in the Graduate Division of the School of Arts and Sciences in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Organizational Dynamics at the University of Pennsylvania Advisor: Rodney Napier This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/od_theses_msod/65 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Leadership Catalyst: A New Paradigm for Helping Leadership Flourish in Organizations Abstract This thesis codifies a leadership paradigm that was born out of my experience as a naval officer, a corporate manager, and a director in a non-profit program and is informed by my study of leadership over the last 30 years—culminating in my completion of the Organizational Dynamics program. The basis for my model is a declaration that a good leader is someone who develops, creates, or otherwise inspires leadership abilities or improved performance in others—a leadership catalyst. My premise is that by becoming leadership catalysts, people can become force multipliers in their organizations by helping to exponentially improve the organization’s leadership capability. -
Choosing to Participate and the Re-Release of This Book Which Has Been Developed to Give Educators a Tool to Explore the Role of Citizenship in Democracy
R evised E Praise for dition FACING HISTORY AND OURSELVES A FACING HISTORY AND OURSELVES PUBLICATION C We are well aware of the forces beyond our control—the attitudes, modes of H behavior, and unexamined assumptions that often, sadly, govern the larger OOSING society, and that undermine the school communities we seek to build. It is to this end that we find Facing History so powerful. From both discussions with teachers and observations of student interaction, it is clear that Facing TO History and Ourselves is a tremendously effective vehicle for engaging P ARTICI students in the critical dialogues essential for a tolerant and just society. Dan Isaacs P Former Assistant Superintendent ATE of the Los Angeles Unified School District • A Facing History and Facing History and Ourselves has become a standard for ambitious and CHOOSING TO courageous educational programming…. At a time when more and more of our population is ignorant about history, and when the media challenge PARTICIPA T E the distinction between truth and fiction—indeed, the very existence of REVISED EDITION truth—it is clear that you must continue to be the standard. Howard Gardner O Professor of Education, Harvard Graduate School of Education urselves Publication Teaching kids to fight intolerance and participate responsibly in their world is the most important work we can do. Matt Damon, Actor, Board of Trustees Member & Former Facing History and Ourselves Student Headquarters 16 Hurd Road Brookline, MA 02445 (617) 232-1595 www.facinghistory.com Visit choosingtoparticipate.org for additional resources, inspiring stories, ways to share your story, and a 3D immersive environment of the exhibition for use in the classroom and beyond. -
Heterogeneous Catalyst Deactivation and Regeneration: a Review
Catalysts 2015, 5, 145-269; doi:10.3390/catal5010145 OPEN ACCESS catalysts ISSN 2073-4344 www.mdpi.com/journal/catalysts Review Heterogeneous Catalyst Deactivation and Regeneration: A Review Morris D. Argyle and Calvin H. Bartholomew * Chemical Engineering Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel: +1-801-422-4162, Fax: +1-801-422-0151. Academic Editor: Keith Hohn Received: 30 December 2013 / Accepted: 12 September 2014 / Published: 26 February 2015 Abstract: Deactivation of heterogeneous catalysts is a ubiquitous problem that causes loss of catalytic rate with time. This review on deactivation and regeneration of heterogeneous catalysts classifies deactivation by type (chemical, thermal, and mechanical) and by mechanism (poisoning, fouling, thermal degradation, vapor formation, vapor-solid and solid-solid reactions, and attrition/crushing). The key features and considerations for each of these deactivation types is reviewed in detail with reference to the latest literature reports in these areas. Two case studies on the deactivation mechanisms of catalysts used for cobalt Fischer-Tropsch and selective catalytic reduction are considered to provide additional depth in the topics of sintering, coking, poisoning, and fouling. Regeneration considerations and options are also briefly discussed for each deactivation mechanism. Keywords: heterogeneous catalysis; deactivation; regeneration 1. Introduction Catalyst deactivation, the loss over time of catalytic activity and/or selectivity, is a problem of great and continuing concern in the practice of industrial catalytic processes. Costs to industry for catalyst replacement and process shutdown total billions of dollars per year. Time scales for catalyst deactivation vary considerably; for example, in the case of cracking catalysts, catalyst mortality may be on the order of seconds, while in ammonia synthesis the iron catalyst may last for 5–10 years. -
Highwood Mountains, Montana
Bulletin No. 237 Series j ft ?e?criPtlv« Gwl°^ 43 , 90 \ D, Petrography and Mineralogy, 29 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR PETROGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY OF THE IGNEOUS ROCKS OF THE HIGHWOOD MOUNTAINS, MONTANA BY LOUIS VALENTINE PIRSSO1ST WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1905 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittal. .......................^............................ 11 Introduction__._.._._.____..--.-----_--.------..--.---...---- .-.------ 13 Bibliography ___.._______. __.__._____..---.._..-------.--.-..----..-..- 14 Chapter I. Geography and history ........----.-....-..--...-.----..----- 14 Location ..__._.._.._____..---..._------- --------------------. 14 Bibliography .. ...-.-...-..----.-_.._. ...... ....................:...... 15 Topography and geography .......................:.-.------.------.- 15 History................................................................. 16 Chapter II. Geology of the igneous stocks ................................ 20 Introductory ................................................... ------ 20 Highwood Peak stock....-.-.-..........-._.....--...-.---_.-.--._... 20 Character of the border contact.-..-.-.-..-..-.--...-----..-.--.- 22 Middle Peak stock.................................................. 23 Contact phenomena. -..---.......---------. -..-..-..--------.-.-- 23 Endomorphic contact phenomena ..........^..................... 24 East Peak stock....................................................... 24 Shonkin stock ...................... ....-'---.--...--".-...-.---.-.---.-