Predation As a Vehicle to Aid Tunicate Invasion in the Biofouling Community

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Predation As a Vehicle to Aid Tunicate Invasion in the Biofouling Community University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Master's Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Fall 2013 Predation as a Vehicle to Aid Tunicate Invasion in the Biofouling Community Helen Day University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Day, Helen, "Predation as a Vehicle to Aid Tunicate Invasion in the Biofouling Community" (2013). Master's Theses and Capstones. 802. https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/802 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Predation as a Vehicle to Aid Tunicate Invasion in the Biofouling Community BY HELEN DAY BS University of Rhode Island, 2006 THESIS Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of M aster o f Science In Zoology September 2013 UMI Number: 1524299 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Di!ss0?t&iori Piiblist’Mlg UMI 1524299 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 This thesis has been examined and approved. Dr. Larry G. Harris (Professor, Zoology) Dr. James F. Hanay (Professor, Zoology) D. Winsor H. Watson (Professor, Zoology) Date TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ............................. i SIGNATURE PAGE ................................................................................. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS...........................................................................v LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................vi LIST OF FIGURES................................................................................... vii ABSTRACT............................................................................................... xiv I. CHAPTER ONE - GENERAL INTRODUCTION Introduced Species as an Ecosystem Stressor ..............................1 Benthic Communities ......................................................................2 Biofouling Communities . .....................................................2 Predation and the Biofouling Community ................................... 4 Biofouling Community Development ...........................................6 Tunicates in the Biofouling Community .......................................8 Molgula citrina and Molgula manhattensis..................10 Ciona intestinalis..............................................................10 Botryllus schlosseri...........................................................11 Botryloides violaceus ....................................................... 12 Diplosoma listeranium.................. 12 Didemnum species ............................................................13 Study Objectives ............................................................................ 13 II. METHODS Introduction ....................................................................................16 Benthic Panel Community: Data Collection ..............................22 Benthic Panel Community: Sessile Invertebrates .....................24 Benthic Panel Community: Identification and Quantification of Molguloid Tunicates ...................................... 28 Benthic Panel Community: Quantification ................................30 Benthic Panel Community: Statistical Analysis ....................... 31 Laboratory Feeding Trial Overview ...........................................34 Predator Inclusion Experiments: Invertebrates ......................... 34 Predator Inclusion Experiments: Fish .........................................36 Predator Inclusion Experiments: Statistical Analysis .............. 40 Y-Maze Prey Choice Experiment ............................................... 40 Y-Maze Prey Choice Experiment: Statistical Analysis ...........41 III. RESULTS Biofouling Community Composition .........................................44 Surface Biofouling Community Composition .......................... 45 Benthic Biofouling Community Composition .......................... 47 Benthic Panel Community Composition ......................... 51 Community Composition and Seasonal Patterns ......................55 Tunicates in Panel Community Composition ........................... 61 Impact of Predation on Tunicate Community Composition. ..63 Impact of Predation on Tunicate Competition .......................... 74 Impact of Predation on Colonial and Solitary Tunicates 76 Caged Control Community Composition .................................. 78 Overall Laboratory Feeding Trial Results .................................. 79 Predators which did not consume M. citrina.............................79 Predators which consumed M. citrina........................................80 Predator Inclusion Results: Tauiogolabrus adspersus............. 80 Predator Inclusion Results: Asterias rubens..............................82 Comparison of Predator Inclusion Results ................................83 Y-Maze Prey Choice Preference Results ................................... 84 Feeding Trial Results Overview ....................................... ..........85 IV. DISCUSSION Community Composition and Successional Development 87 Impact of Predation on Community Development ...................93 Competitive Interactions between Sessile Species ...................99 Predators as Eco-system Engineers .......................................... 107 Limitations to this Study .............................................................108 Importance of this Study ................................. 109 Future Directions .......................................................................... 110 LIST OF REFERENCES........................................ 1 APPENDIX A - FEEDING TRIAL DATA............................................ 18 APPENDIX B - IACUC PERMISSION............................................... 24 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Larry Harris for all his help and guidance throughout this project. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. James Haney and Dr. Win Watson for their help. I would like to thank the University of New Hampshire for their academic and financial support including the Summer Teaching Assistant Fellowship and the Lemer-Grey Fellowship; Finally, I would like to thank my friends and family. LIST OF TABLES Table 1: The distribution of replicates (all predator access. AA; fish access, FA; no predator access, NA) along the pier, the replicate closest to the shore is on the left. Table 3: Details of Y-Maze testing with the predator A rubens and the prey items M citrina and M. edulis. Table 4: An ethogram of behaviors anticipated to occur during Y-Maze prey choice preference experiments. Table 5: Results of Y-Maze choice test with ,4. rubens. Table 6: Results of Y-Maze choice test with A rubens. Table 7: Results of sessile invertebrate species between caged and uncaged treatment types. Table 8: Table of tunicate species found on benthic community panels. Table 9: Frequency of abundances of tunicate species between caged and uncaged treatment types. Table 10: The frequency of disturbance events which reduced the abundances of tunicate species. Table 11: Tunicate species richness on benthic community panels. Table 12: Feeding trial results with a suite of potential predators that were commonly found at the CML pier field site. Table 13: Feeding trial results for T. adspersus. Table 14: Feeding trial results with A. rubens. Table 15: Results of video analysis of A. rubens foraging and feeding behavior towards M. citrina. Table 16: Results of initial choice (i.e. first choice) in Y-Maze prey choice preference between M. citrina and M. edulis. Table 17: Results of Y Maze prey choice preference for A. rubens between M. citrina and M. edulis. vi Table 18: Feeding trial results for the predators Flabellina verrucosa, Carcinus maenas and Cyclopterus lumpus with the prey item M. citrina. Table 19: Table 19: Feeding trial results. Medium size class = 0-9.99 cm: Large size class = 10-20 cm. Table 20: Results of all feeding trials with T. adspersus. Table 21: The results ofY Maze Prey Choice Preference between M. citrina and no prey item. Table 22: Results of video analysis of A. rubens foraging and feeding behavior. Table 23: Results of feeding trials with T. adspersus. Table 24: Results of Y Maze prey choice preference for A. rubens between M. citrina and M. edulis. LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Arial photograph of the University of New Hampshire Coastal Marine Laboratory pier where the benthic community panels were located. Photo courtesy of The University of New Hampshire (2010). Figure 2: The location of the Gulf of Maine (GofM) on the eastern seaboard. The line of separation which can serve as a barrier to dispersal
Recommended publications
  • Records of Five Bryozoan Species from Offshore Gas Platforms Rare for the Dutch North Sea
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 05, 2021 Records of five bryozoan species from offshore gas platforms rare for the Dutch North Sea Beukhof, Esther D.; Coolen, Joop W. P.; van der Weide, Babeth E.; Cuperus, Joël; de Blauwe, Hans; Lust, Jerry Published in: Marine Biodiversity Records Link to article, DOI: 10.1186/s41200-016-0086-6 Publication date: 2016 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Beukhof, E. D., Coolen, J. W. P., van der Weide, B. E., Cuperus, J., de Blauwe, H., & Lust, J. (2016). Records of five bryozoan species from offshore gas platforms rare for the Dutch North Sea. Marine Biodiversity Records, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41200-016-0086-6 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Beukhof et al. Marine Biodiversity Records (2016) 9:91 DOI 10.1186/s41200-016-0086-6 MARINE RECORD Open Access Records of five bryozoan species from offshore gas platforms rare for the Dutch North Sea Esther D.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoology Diversity of Invertebrates Structure
    ZOOLOGY DIVERSITY OF INVERTEBRATES STRUCTURE OF OBELIA --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Introduction: Obelia is worldwide in distribution in the form of plant and is observed in white or light brown in colour in the form of fur in the seas and oceans. It is usually known as Sea-fur. Its name is derived from the Greek word called ‘obelias’,means loaf baked on a spit. • Phylum: Colenterata • Class: Hydrozoa • Order: Hydroida • Sub-order: Leptomedusae • Genus: Obelia • Species: geniculata As it is having three forms like polyp, medusa and blasto style, it is described as trimorphic hydrozoan. Among many species like O. geniculate, O. longissimi, O. bidentata, O. dichotoma. O. geniculate is the most common example studied. Habit and Habitat of Obelia: It is sedentary, marine colonial form present throughout the world on the surfaces of sea weeds, rocks, wooden piles, molluscan shells etc., in the shallow water up to 80-100 meters depth. It is observed in both sexual forms as hydroid colony and asexual form as medusa. Structure of Hydroid Colony: Hydroid colony of obelia is sensitive, transparent consists of horizontal hydrorhiza and vertical hydrocaulus. Hydrorhiza: Hydrorhiza is horizontal thread like root attached to the substratum. It is hollow tube like and gives of vertical branches called hydrocaulus. The tubular part of hydrorhiza are also called stolons. Hydrocaulus: Hydrocaulus are vertical branches arising from hydrorhiza for a length of 2-3 cms. These are also hollow with short lateral branches alternatively in cymose manner. Each alternate branch bears terminal polyp zooids. OBELIA COLONY Each ultimate branch terminates in nutritive zooids called hydranth and axils of the older polyps consists of reproductive zooids called blastostyles or gonangia, thus obelia colony is dimorphic and when gonangia produces saucer shaped buds as a result of asexual reproduction and develops into sexual zooids called medusae, obelia colony becomes trimorphic colony.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimate of Microbial Biodiversity in Electra Pilosa and Alcyonium Digitatum
    UPTEC X06 045 Examensarbete 20 p December 2006 Estimate of microbial biodiversity in Electra pilosa and Alcyonium digitatum Hélène Harnemark Molecular Biotechnology Programme Uppsala University School of Engineering UPTEC X 06 045 Date of issue 2006-11 Author Hélène Harnemark Title (English) Estimate of microbial biodiversity in Electra pilosa and Alcyonium digitatum Abstract In attempting to characterize the microbial population of the marine species Electra pilosa and Alcyonium digitatum this study yielded a wide range of microbial growth using in vivo cultivation techniques on agar plates and PCR. The methods of the study were evaluated to the benefit of coming studies. Keywords Electra pilosa, Alcyonium digitatum, PCR, agar cultivation, marine organisms Supervisors Erik Hedner Department of medicinal chemistry, division of pharmacognosy, Uppsala University Scientific reviewer Anders Backlund Department of medicinal chemistry, division of pharmacognosy, Uppsala University Project name Sponsors Language Security English Classification ISSN 1401-2138 Supplementary bibliographical information Pages 22 Biology Education Centre Biomedical Center Husargatan 3 Uppsala Box 592 S-75124 Uppsala Tel +46 (0)18 4710000 Fax +46 (0)18 555217 Estimate of microbial biodiversity in Electra pilosa and Alcyonium digitatum Hélène Harnemark Sammanfattning Våra världshav är en relativt ny källa för vetenskapliga upptäckter. Det har länge varit svårt att utnyttja och undersöka något på havets bottnar. När resurser och utrustning under de senaste årtiondena blivit bättre har vi sett att här finns mycket att finna. Man har exempelvis hittat havslevande djur som kan skydda sig från parasiter utan att ha ett immunförsvar. De har tagit hjälp av bakterier som tillverkar olika giftiga ämnen som sprids i djurets omgivningar eller stannar på dess yta, vilket ger ett skydd från vissa rovdjur.
    [Show full text]
  • 1471-2148-9-187.Pdf
    BMC Evolutionary Biology BioMed Central Research article Open Access An updated 18S rRNA phylogeny of tunicates based on mixture and secondary structure models Georgia Tsagkogeorga1,2, Xavier Turon3, Russell R Hopcroft4, Marie- Ka Tilak1,2, Tamar Feldstein5, Noa Shenkar5,6, Yossi Loya5, Dorothée Huchon5, Emmanuel JP Douzery1,2 and Frédéric Delsuc*1,2 Address: 1Université Montpellier 2, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution (UMR 5554), CC064, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 05, France, 2CNRS, Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution (UMR 5554), CC064, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 05, France, 3Centre d'Estudis Avançats de Blanes (CEAB, CSIC), Accés Cala S. Francesc 14, 17300 Blanes (Girona), Spain, 4Institute of Marine Science, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, USA, 5Department of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel and 6Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA Email: Georgia Tsagkogeorga - [email protected]; Xavier Turon - [email protected]; Russell R Hopcroft - [email protected]; Marie-Ka Tilak - [email protected]; Tamar Feldstein - [email protected]; Noa Shenkar - [email protected]; Yossi Loya - [email protected]; Dorothée Huchon - [email protected]; Emmanuel JP Douzery - [email protected]; Frédéric Delsuc* - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 5 August 2009 Received: 16 October 2008 Accepted: 5 August 2009 BMC Evolutionary Biology 2009, 9:187 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-187 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/9/187 © 2009 Tsagkogeorga et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Biology
    Marine Biology Spatial and temporal dynamics of ascidian invasions in the continental United States and Alaska. --Manuscript Draft-- Manuscript Number: MABI-D-16-00297 Full Title: Spatial and temporal dynamics of ascidian invasions in the continental United States and Alaska. Article Type: S.I. : Invasive Species Keywords: ascidians, biofouling, biogeography, marine invasions, nonindigenous, non-native species, North America Corresponding Author: Christina Simkanin, Phd Smithsonian Environmental Research Center Edgewater, MD UNITED STATES Corresponding Author Secondary Information: Corresponding Author's Institution: Smithsonian Environmental Research Center Corresponding Author's Secondary Institution: First Author: Christina Simkanin, Phd First Author Secondary Information: Order of Authors: Christina Simkanin, Phd Paul W. Fofonoff Kristen Larson Gretchen Lambert Jennifer Dijkstra Gregory M. Ruiz Order of Authors Secondary Information: Funding Information: California Department of Fish and Wildlife Dr. Gregory M. Ruiz National Sea Grant Program Dr. Gregory M. Ruiz Prince William Sound Regional Citizens' Dr. Gregory M. Ruiz Advisory Council Smithsonian Institution Dr. Gregory M. Ruiz United States Coast Guard Dr. Gregory M. Ruiz United States Department of Defense Dr. Gregory M. Ruiz Legacy Program Abstract: SSpecies introductions have increased dramatically in number, rate, and magnitude of impact in recent decades. In marine systems, invertebrates are the largest and most diverse component of coastal invasions throughout the world. Ascidians are conspicuous and well-studied members of this group, however, much of what is known about their invasion history is limited to particular species or locations. Here, we provide a large-scale assessment of invasions, using an extensive literature review and standardized field surveys, to characterize the invasion dynamics of non-native ascidians in the continental United States and Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • Bering Sea Marine Invasive Species Assessment Alaska Center for Conservation Science
    Bering Sea Marine Invasive Species Assessment Alaska Center for Conservation Science Scientific Name: Molgula citrina Phylum Chordata Common Name sea grape Class Ascidiacea Order Stolidobranchia Family Molgulidae Z:\GAP\NPRB Marine Invasives\NPRB_DB\SppMaps\MOLCIT.png 78 Final Rank 53.15 Data Deficiency: 8.75 Category Scores and Data Deficiencies Total Data Deficient Category Score Possible Points Distribution and Habitat: 20.5 26 3.75 Anthropogenic Influence: 4.75 10 0 Biological Characteristics: 19.5 30 0 Impacts: 3.75 25 5.00 Figure 1. Occurrence records for non-native species, and their geographic proximity to the Bering Sea. Ecoregions are based on the classification system by Spalding et al. (2007). Totals: 48.50 91.25 8.75 Occurrence record data source(s): NEMESIS and NAS databases. General Biological Information Tolerances and Thresholds Minimum Temperature (°C) -1.4 Minimum Salinity (ppt) 17 Maximum Temperature (°C) 12.2 Maximum Salinity (ppt) 35 Minimum Reproductive Temperature (°C) NA Minimum Reproductive Salinity (ppt) 31* Maximum Reproductive Temperature (°C) NA Maximum Reproductive Salinity (ppt) 35* Additional Notes M. citrina is a prominent member of the fouling community. It is widely distributed in the North Atlantic, and has been reported as far north as 78°N (Lambert et al. 2010). In North America, it has been found from eastern Canada to Massachusetts. In 2008, it was found in Kachemak Bay in Alaska, the first time it had been detected in the Pacific Ocean (Lambert et al. 2010). While it is possible that these individuals are native to AK, preliminary DNA results suggest that they are genetically identical to specimens of the NE Atlantic.
    [Show full text]
  • Individual Autozooidal Behaviour and Feeding in Marine Bryozoans
    Individual autozooidal behaviour and feeding in marine bryozoans Natalia Nickolaevna Shunatova, Andrew Nickolaevitch Ostrovsky Shunatova NN, Ostrovsky AN. 2001. Individual autozooidal behaviour and feeding in marine SARSIA bryozoans. Sarsia 86:113-142. The article is devoted to individual behaviour of autozooids (mainly connected with feeding and cleaning) in 40 species and subspecies of marine bryozoans from the White Sea and the Barents Sea. We present comparative descriptions of the observations and for the first time describe some of autozooidal activities (e.g. cleaning of the colony surface by a reversal of tentacular ciliature beating, variants of testing-position, and particle capture and rejection). Non-contradictory aspects from the main hypotheses on bryozoan feeding have been used to create a model of feeding mechanism. Flick- ing activity in the absence of previous mechanical contact between tentacle and particle leads to the inference that polypides in some species can detect particles at some distance. The discussion deals with both normal and “spontaneous” reactions, as well as differences and similarities in autozooidal behaviour and their probable causes. Approaches to classification of the diversity of bryozoan behav- iour (functional and morphological) are considered. Behavioural reactions recorded are classified using a morphological approach based on the structure (tentacular ciliature, tentacles and entire polypide) performing the reaction. We suggest that polypide protrusion and retraction might be the basis of the origin of some other individual activities. Individual autozooidal behaviour is considered to be a flexible and sensitive system of reactions in which the activities can be performed in different combinations and successions and can be switched depending on the situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) Associated to a Subtropical Sargassum Cymosum (Phaeophyta: Fucales) Bed
    ZOOLOGIA 27 (6): 945–955, December, 2010 doi: 10.1590/S1984-46702010000600016 Seasonal variation of epiphytic hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) associated to a subtropical Sargassum cymosum (Phaeophyta: Fucales) bed Amanda Ferreira Cunha1 & Giuliano Buzá Jacobucci2 1 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo. Rua do Matão, Travessa 14, 101, Cidade Universitária, 05508-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia. Rua Ceará, Campus Umuarama, 38402-400 Uberlândia, MG, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Hydroids are broadly reported in epiphytic associations from different localities showing marked seasonal cycles. Studies have shown that the factors behind these seasonal differences in hydroid richness and abundance may vary significantly according to the area of study. Seasonal differences in epiphytic hydroid cover and richness were evaluated in a Sargassum cymosum C. Agardh bed from Lázaro beach, at Ubatuba, Brazil. Significant seasonal differences were found in total hydroid cover, but not in species richness. Hydroid cover increased from March (early fall) to February (summer). Most of this pattern was caused by two of the most abundant species: Aglaophenia latecarinata Allman, 1877 and Orthopyxis sargassicola (Nutting, 1915). Hydroid richness seems to be related to S. cymosum size but not directly to its biomass. The seasonal differences in hydroid richness and algal cover are shown to be similar to other works in the study region and in the Mediterranean. Seasonal recruitment of hydroid species larvae may be responsible for their seasonal differences in algal cover, although other factors such as grazing activity of gammarid amphipods on S.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Aquatic Nuisance Species Management Plan
    CONNECTICUT AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Connecticut Aquatic Nuisance Species Working Group TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents 3 Acknowledgements 5 Executive Summary 6 1. INTRODUCTION 10 1.1. Scope of the ANS Problem in Connecticut 10 1.2. Relationship with other ANS Plans 10 1.3. The Development of the CT ANS Plan (Process and Participants) 11 1.3.1. The CT ANS Sub-Committees 11 1.3.2. Scientific Review Process 12 1.3.3. Public Review Process 12 1.3.4. Agency Review Process 12 2. PROBLEM DEFINITION AND RANKING 13 2.1. History and Biogeography of ANS in CT 13 2.2. Current and Potential Impacts of ANS in CT 15 2.2.1. Economic Impacts 16 2.2.2. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Impacts 19 2.3. Priority Aquatic Nuisance Species 19 2.3.1. Established ANS Priority Species or Species Groups 21 2.3.2. Potentially Threatening ANS Priority Species or Species Groups 23 2.4. Priority Vectors 23 2.5. Priorities for Action 23 3. EXISTING AUTHORITIES AND PROGRAMS 30 3.1. International Authorities and Programs 30 3.2. Federal Authorities and Programs 31 3.3. Regional Authorities and Programs 37 3.4. State Authorities and Programs 39 3.5. Local Authorities and Programs 45 4. GOALS 47 3 5. OBJECTIVES, STRATEGIES, AND ACTIONS 48 6. IMPLEMENTATION TABLE 72 7. PROGRAM MONITORING AND EVALUATION 80 Glossary* 81 Appendix A. Listings of Known Non-Native ANS and Potential ANS in Connecticut 83 Appendix B. Descriptions of Species Identified as ANS or Potential ANS 93 Appendix C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Epizoic Diatom Community on Four Bryozoan Species from Helgoland (German Bight, North Sea)
    Helgol Mar Res (2003) 57:13–19 DOI 10.1007/s10152-002-0117-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE Cornelia Wuchter · Jürgen Marquardt Wolfgang E. Krumbein The epizoic diatom community on four bryozoan species from Helgoland (German Bight, North Sea) Received: 30 October 2001 / Accepted: 8 July 2002 / Published online: 28 September 2002 © Springer-Verlag and AWI 2002 Abstract The composition of the diatom community on also be a consequence of the surface properties of the the bryozoans Electra pilosa, Membranipora membrana- bryozoan. cea, Flustra foliacea, and Alcyonidium gelatinosum from the German Bight was studied by light and scanning elec- Keywords Biofilms · Bryozoa · Diatoms · Epizoic tron microscopy. In total, members of 26 diatom genera communities · Microbial mats were found, with Cocconeis, Tabularia, Licmophora, Am- phora, and Navicula being the most abundant. The amount and the composition of the diatom covering seem Introduction to be typical for single bryozoan species. Electra pilosa and Membranipora membranacea showed a rather dense Bryozoan colonies are a favorable microenvironment for covering with 71–547 cells/mm2 and 77–110 cells/mm2, benthic microorganisms. Their often highly sculptured respectively. The most prominent genus on Electra pi- surface offers protection against predators and the feed- losa was Cocconeis, reaching up to 58% of all diatoms ing current generated by the polypids provides a perma- in one sample, followed by Navicula, Tabularia and Am- nent supply of nutrients (Scholz 1995). Accordingly, phora. The most abundant genera on Membranipora they often host extensive microbial mats and biofilms. It membranacea were Tabularia and Licmophora, making has been noticed that these microbial communities differ up almost 70% of all diatoms in one sample, followed by from those of the surrounding substratum, and that bio- Navicula, Cocconeis and Amphora.
    [Show full text]
  • Metabarcoding Analysis on European Coastal Samples Reveals New
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Metabarcoding analysis on European coastal samples reveals new molecular metazoan diversity Received: 8 November 2017 David López-Escardó1, Jordi Paps2, Colomban de Vargas3,4, Ramon Massana5, Accepted: 5 June 2018 Iñaki Ruiz-Trillo 1,6,7 & Javier del Campo1,5 Published: xx xx xxxx Although animals are among the best studied organisms, we still lack a full description of their diversity, especially for microscopic taxa. This is partly due to the time-consuming and costly nature of surveying animal diversity through morphological and molecular studies of individual taxa. A powerful alternative is the use of high-throughput environmental sequencing, providing molecular data from all organisms sampled. We here address the unknown diversity of animal phyla in marine environments using an extensive dataset designed to assess eukaryotic ribosomal diversity among European coastal locations. A multi-phylum assessment of marine animal diversity that includes water column and sediments, oxic and anoxic environments, and both DNA and RNA templates, revealed a high percentage of novel 18S rRNA sequences in most phyla, suggesting that marine environments have not yet been fully sampled at a molecular level. This novelty is especially high among Platyhelminthes, Acoelomorpha, and Nematoda, which are well studied from a morphological perspective and abundant in benthic environments. We also identifed, based on molecular data, a potentially novel group of widespread tunicates. Moreover, we recovered a high number of reads for Ctenophora and Cnidaria in the smaller fractions suggesting their gametes might play a greater ecological role than previously suspected. Te animal kingdom is one of the best-studied branches of the tree of life1, with more than 1.5 million species described in around 35 diferent phyla2.
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland: a Laboratory for Non-Indigenous Ascidians
    BioInvasions Records (2020) Volume 9, Issue 3: 450–460 CORRECTED PROOF Research Article Iceland: a laboratory for non-indigenous ascidians Alfonso A. Ramos-Esplá1,*, Joana Micael2, Halldór P. Halldórsson3 and Sindri Gíslason2 1Research Marine Centre of Santa Pola (CIMAR), University of Alicante, 03080 Alicante, Spain 2Southwest Iceland Nature Research Centre (SINRC), 245 Suðurnesjabær, Iceland 3University of Iceland, Sudurnes Research Center, 245 Suðurnesjabær, Iceland *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Citation: Ramos-Esplá AA, Micael J, Halldórsson HP, Gíslason S (2020) Abstract Iceland: a laboratory for non-indigenous ascidians. BioInvasions Records 9(3): 450– Non-indigenous species (NIS) represent a serious problem worldwide, where ascidians 460, https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2020.9.3.01 are one of the most important taxa. However, little has been done to document the non-indigenous ascidians in Iceland, and over the past decade only two species had Received: 30 October 2019 been recorded prior to the present study, Ciona intestinalis in 2007 and Botryllus Accepted: 19 March 2020 schlosseri in 2011. To increase the knowledge of this taxon, extensive sampling Published: 7 May 2020 was carried out in shallow waters around Iceland, during the summer 2018, in ports Handling editor: Noa Shenkar and on ropes of a long-line mussel aquaculture. In total, eleven species were identified, Thematic editor: Stelios Katsanevakis four native and seven NIS, of which Diplosoma listerianum, Ascidiella aspersa, Copyright: © Ramos-Esplá et al. Botrylloides violaceus, Molgula manhattensis and Ciona cf. robusta, are now reported This is an open access article distributed under terms for the first time in Iceland.
    [Show full text]