DOCSLIB.ORG

Alexander the Ends of the Earth Ebook Free Download

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alexander the Ends of the Earth Ebook Free Download ALEXANDER THE ENDS OF THE EARTH PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Manfredi | 462 pages | 01 Aug 2002 | SIMON & SCHUSTER | 9780743434386 | English | New York, United States Alexander the Ends of the Earth PDF Book Alexander tried to persuade his soldiers to march farther, but his general Coenus pleads with him to change his opinion and turn back. Edmund Talbot 3 episodes, Egypt crowned him Pharaoh. Search By Tags. Alexander the Great was born in BC. Get a sneak peek of the new version of this page. Phillips 3 episodes, Members Reviews Popularity Average rating Mentions 9 26, 3. Share on Twitter. Animal Farm and by George Orwell and A. Be the first to write a review About this product. Alexander Vol. Paperback Books Alexander Kent. Goofs At the end of the series when Edmund is on the dock looking out at the small boats, the same slender blond girl wearing a tan blouse passes behind him twice, from left to right, in a few seconds. Runtime: min 3 parts. Focusing both on international comparisons and on the personal histories of many of the pioneers, their determination and dedication, their setbacks and successes, he shows how European and American women gradually broke through the wall of resistance to women in medicine. Not too many ways to find out how Alexander was evil, it might be because no one wants to remember that. I would have to say that yes he was great. Yet, when he tries to make his dream of a great unite Empire between Macedonians and Persians reality, his army starts to doubt his ideals and to critique his way of adapting to Persian customs at court. About this product. Be the first to write a review About this product. Alexander founded 70 different cities, far more than anyone has ever done before in such a short time span. Alexander the Great Term Paper I have chosen to write about Alexander the Great and how effective he was as a military leader, king, and conqueror. Animal Farm and by George Orwell and A. The Macedonian Army march in search of limitless glory, crushing resistance at every turn. CD Audiobook 0 editions. He was a true heir to Achilles and Hercules, a leader who had guided troops to victory beyond the Nile, the Tigris, and the Euphrates. About this product. His army seems unstoppable and unbeatable, driven forward by a man that defies human capabilities. Watch on Prime Video included with Prime. That passion overwhelmed cities and armies Pike 3 episodes, Share on Facebook. November Alexander the Ends of the Earth Writer Et siliut terra in conspectu eius. Feb 09, Faith rated it liked it Shelves: audio , overdrive. When the Oracle of Ammon tells Alexander that he is the son of Zeus , the young Macedonian king finds even more inner strength and will to conquer new lands and rule the biggest Empire ever known. But there was still a lot which was OK, but nothing more than that. Alexander was Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms. That is not to say that he didn't try. Like the first few books, the novel moves at a brisk pace and deals with the struggles that the army endures both from the environment and every varying foes. A really good read - highly recommended! They have not found his tomb or body or sarcophagus as speculated to begin investigations into his death. But his army reached the limit of its endurance, and the cost of triumph had been high -- in blood, betrayal, and tragedy. Project Gutenberg 0 editions. Yet, when he tries to make his dream of a great unite Empire between Macedonians and Persians reality, his army starts to doubt his ideals and to critique his way of adapting to Persian customs at court. Brand new: Lowest price The lowest-priced brand-new, unused, unopened, undamaged item in its original packaging where packaging is applicable. In pre- Civil War America, in Tsarist Russia, in Victorian England, special schools of medicine for women were widely established as early as as a kind of way-station on the road to medical coeducation. This was a well-written and concise biography of one of the World's greatest conquerors. More filters. Average rating 4. Alexander Vol. The book does not shy away from the faults of the conqueror. No trivia or quizzes yet. Situation accelerates, insults continue and intoxicated Alexander throws a spear at Black, hitting and killing him instantly Bowles 3 episodes, See details for additional description. Auction: Pre-owned. There needs to be more information, detail, or reference in those holes. Zenobia 3 episodes, Where extensive literature is absent, history is mostly a guessing game. This article about an Australian photographer is a stub. A recently arrived poet recites a text insulting one of the Macedomian generals who just died. To ask other readers questions about The Ends of the Earth , please sign up. Stock photo. Just didn't expect it to be this short. Not exactly a page-turner, but its characters haunt you at all times. A bio and an attempt to answer the question: was he great? I read these book purely from an academic poitn of view, like research, I didn;t read them waiting to get a buzz. May 10, Joao Felipe rated it really liked it. I thoroughly enjoyed this three book series! So, my adventures with the great king of Macedonia are over. Welcome back. That obviously depends on your perspective and what qualities you think a truly great person should have. He also is unabashed about Alexander's gayness. Alexander the Ends of the Earth Reviews Most travel books seem trivial beside it. Wikipedia in English None. And all Persia acknowledged him as Great King. Last book of ! The whole point fades to nothingness when you consider that in those times bloodthirstiness WAS greatness. He describes more recent developments such as the creation of new independent churches, megachurches, and the "health and wealth" gospel, and he explores the increasing involvement of pentecostals in public and political affairs across the globe. Get A Copy. Returning to Asia in the wake of his Egyptian conquests, Alexander encounters Etocles, the Persian son of Alexander's lover who is determined to liberate his imprisoned family members at any cost. In the medieval Shahnameh, Alexander—or Iskandar, as he came to be known in the Middle East—is a noble Iranian prince of the royal line, but is also vilified as the destroyer of Persian power. Rating details. Dec 19, Reid rated it really liked it. Feb 12, David Gamble rated it really liked it Shelves: books-i- want-to-read-again , history-and-culture. Survives an assacination attempt and comes close to mutiny in his own army. Mar 06, John M rated it liked it. Greek culture, and by extension Alexander, was violent, superstitious, cruel and misogynistic. To the Ends of the Earth combines the best of his travel writing. I have always been interested in Alexander and his family. The slightly later Iskandarnameh portrays the king as an ideal ruler of Greek origin, a philosopher and scientist as well as a warrior, who marries Roxane, daughter of the Great King Darius, and takes the throne, then travels to China and journeys to Mecca. Fearing the prospect of facing other large armies and exhausted by years of campaigning, Alexander's army mutinies at the Hyphasis River , refusing to march farther east. May There needs to be more information, detail, or reference in those holes. As I find the 5 star system a bit limiting, I like to use my arbitrary rating system SLIC which stands for story, language, ideas and characters on a 10 point scale. June 10, To truly understand Alexander we must realize that—perhaps more than any man in history—he hated to lose. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Amazon Kindle 0 editions. It is now time to start anew and Alexander decides on yet another hard task: unify the Persian people with the Macedonians. A comprehensive survey of the geological and natural histories of the Arctic and Antarctic, their importance in myth, legend, and human history. A strategically brilliant move, but at the same time a step towards alienating his own people, who with time will not be able to recognise the empire as their own. The book does not shy away from the faults of the conqueror. Manfredi does a splendid job in bringing the legend alive through deft and engaging writing. Be the first to ask a question about The Ends of the Earth. This feels like a Look, if you're looking for a quick learner about Alexander the Great, this will get the job done. Manfredi sticks very closely to the facts and sources, and that's very admirable. Alexander the Ends of the Earth Read Online The officers leading themarch spokewith the guides; thosein charge Who isn't intrigued by Alexander the Great? The descendants of Macedonian and Greek soldiers continued to dwell in the many Alexandrias the king had established in the East. Alternate Versions. Three hundred and sixty- five--one for each day of the year, each with their own entourage, naturally. In To the Ends of the Earth, Allan Heaton Anderson explores the historical and theological factors behind the phenomenal growth of global Pentecostalism. And how similar are their finds to the plants we grow today? Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms. To ask other readers questions about The Ends of the Earth , please sign up.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Royal Power, Law and Justice in Ancient Macedonia Joseph Roisman
    Royal Power, Law and Justice in Ancient Macedonia Joseph Roisman In his speech On the Crown Demosthenes often lionizes himself by suggesting that his actions and policy required him to overcome insurmountable obstacles. Thus he contrasts Athens’ weakness around 346 B.C.E. with Macedonia’s strength, and Philip’s II unlimited power with the more constrained and cumbersome decision-making process at home, before asserting that in spite of these difficulties he succeeded in forging later a large Greek coalition to confront Philip in the battle of Chaeronea (Dem.18.234–37). [F]irst, he (Philip) ruled in his own person as full sovereign over subservient people, which is the most important factor of all in waging war . he was flush with money, and he did whatever he wished. He did not announce his intentions in official decrees, did not deliberate in public, was not hauled into the courts by sycophants, was not prosecuted for moving illegal proposals, was not accountable to anyone. In short, he was ruler, commander, in control of everything.1 For his depiction of Philip’s authority Demosthenes looks less to Macedonia than to Athens, because what makes the king powerful in his speech is his freedom from democratic checks. Nevertheless, his observations on the Macedonian royal power is more informative and helpful than Aristotle’s references to it in his Politics, though modern historians tend to privilege the philosopher for what he says or even does not say on the subject. Aristotle’s seldom mentions Macedonian kings, and when he does it is for limited, exemplary purposes, lumping them with other kings who came to power through benefaction and public service, or who were assassinated by men they had insulted.2 Moreover, according to Aristotle, the extreme of tyranny is distinguished from ideal kingship (pambasilea) by the fact that tyranny is a government that is not called to account.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander's Seventh Phalanx Battalion Milns, R D Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1966; 7, 2; Proquest Pg
    Alexander's Seventh Phalanx Battalion Milns, R D Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1966; 7, 2; ProQuest pg. 159 Alexander's Seventh Phalanx Battalion R. D. Milns SOME TIME between the battle of Gaugamela and the battle of A the Hydaspes the number of battalions in the Macedonian phalanx was raised from six to seven.1 This much is clear; what is not certain is when the new formation came into being. Berve2 believes that the introduction took place at Susa in 331 B.C. He bases his belief on two facts: (a) the arrival of 6,000 Macedonian infantry and 500 Macedonian cavalry under Amyntas, son of Andromenes, when the King was either near or at Susa;3 (b) the appearance of Philotas (not the son of Parmenion) as a battalion leader shortly afterwards at the Persian Gates.4 Tarn, in his discussion of the phalanx,5 believes that the seventh battalion was not created until 328/7, when Alexander was at Bactra, the new battalion being that of Cleitus "the White".6 Berve is re­ jected on the grounds: (a) that Arrian (3.16.11) says that Amyntas' reinforcements were "inserted into the existing (six) battalions KC1:TCt. e8vr(; (b) that Philotas has in fact taken over the command of Perdiccas' battalion, Perdiccas having been "promoted to the Staff ... doubtless after the battle" (i.e. Gaugamela).7 The seventh battalion was formed, he believes, from reinforcements from Macedonia who reached Alexander at Nautaca.8 Now all of Tarn's arguments are open to objection; and I shall treat them in the order they are presented above.
    [Show full text]
  • The Court of Alexander the Great As Social System
    Originalveröffentlichung in Waldemar Heckel/Lawrence Tritle (Hg.), Alexander the Great. A New History, Malden, Mass. u.a. 2009, S. 83-98 5 The Court of Alexander the Great as Social System Gregor Weber In his discussion of events that followed Alexander ’s march through Hyrcania (summer 330), Plutarch gives a succinct summary of the king ’s conduct and reports the clash of his closest friends, Hephaestion and Craterus (Alex. 47.5.9-11).1 The passage belongs in the context of Alexander ’s adoption of the traditions and trap ­ pings of the dead Persian Great King (Fredricksmeyer 2000; Brosius 2003a), although the conflict between the two generals dates to the time of the Indian campaign (probably 326). It reveals not only that Alexander was subtly in tune with the atti­ tudes of his closest friends, but also that his changes elicited varied responses from the members of his circle. Their relationships with each other were based on rivalry, something Alexander - as Plutarch ’s wording suggests - actively encouraged. But it is also reported that Alexander made an effort to bring about a lasting reconcili ­ ation of the two friends, who had attacked each other with swords, and drawn their respective troops into the fray. To do so, he had to marshal “all his resources ” (Hamilton 1969; 128-31) from gestures of affection to death threats. These circumstances invite the question: what was the structural relevance of such an episode beyond the mutual antagonism of Hephaestion and Craterus? For these were not minor protagonists, but rather men of the upper echelon of the new Macedonian-Persian empire, with whose help Alexander had advanced his con ­ quest ever further and exercised his power (Berve nos.
    [Show full text]
  • MAC II in General, All Greek Troops “Constitutionally
    ALEXANDER’S FINAL ARMY An Honors Thesis for the Department of History By Jonathan A. Miller Thesis Advisor: Steven Hirsch Tufts University, 2011 AKNOWLEDGMENTS Alexander the Great is a man with whom many great leaders throughout history have been compared, a model of excellence whose achievements can never quite be matched. 2 My introduction to his legacy occurred in the third grade. Reading a biography of Julius Caesar for a class project, I happened across Plutarch’s famous description of Caesar’s reaction to reading a history of Alexander: “he was lost in thought for a long time, and then burst into tears. His friends were astonished, and asked the reason for his tears. ‘Do you not think,’ said he, ‘that it is a matter of sorrow that while Alexander, at my age, was already king of so many peoples, I have as yet achieved no brilliant success?’”1 This story captivated my imagination and stuck with me throughout my middle and high school years. Once at college, I decided to write a thesis on Alexander to better understand the one man capable of breeding thoughts of inadequacy in Caesar. This work is in many ways a tribute to both Caesar and Alexander. More pointedly, it is an exploration into the designs of a man at the feet of whom lay the whole world. This paper has meant a lot to me. I want to thank all those who made it possible. First and foremost, my undying gratitude goes to Professor Steven Hirsch, who has helped me navigate the difficult process of researching and writing this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander the Not So Great William Baran Bill Ba
    ______________________________________________________________________________ Alexander the Not So Great William Baran Bill Baran, from Crystal Lake, Illinois, wrote "Alexander the Not So Great" during his senior year for Dr. Lee Patterson's Alexander the Great course in Fall 2015. He is currently a senior, majoring in history, and expects to graduate in May 2016. ______________________________________________________________________________ “It is perhaps Ptolemy who first coined the title ‘Great’ to describe Alexander, an epithet that has stayed with him to this day.”1 Whether or not this is true, somewhere along the way Alexander inherited the title “Great,” but is it one that he deserves? Alexander is responsible for expanding Macedonian territory significantly and it is something that he could not have accomplished alone. Since the backing of the army was crucial, why did some of Alexander’s generals not live past the life of Alexander? Although some of the generals and other army personnel inevitably died while in battle, others did not receive such a glorified death. Under Alexander’s rule numerous people in his army were murdered or died under suspicious circumstances. The death witnessed while Alexander ruled did not end there, because the army as a whole often suffered due to poor decision making on Alexander’s part. Whether direct or indirect Alexander ordered or caused the deaths of many because of anger, suspicion, or by poor choices. Alexander does not deserve the title “Great,” because of the deliberate killing under his command of both individuals and his army. Before embarking on the journey of tearing down Alexander’s title, it is important to understand the transition from Philip II to Alexander.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contest for Macedon
    The Contest for Macedon: A Study on the Conflict Between Cassander and Polyperchon (319 – 308 B.C.). Evan Pitt B.A. (Hons. I). Grad. Dip. This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Humanities University of Tasmania October 2016 Declaration of Originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does this thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Evan Pitt 27/10/2016 Authority of Access This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Evan Pitt 27/10/2016 ii Acknowledgements A doctoral dissertation is never completed alone, and I am forever grateful to my supervisor, mentor and friend, Dr Graeme Miles, who has unfailingly encouraged and supported me over the many years. I am also thankful to all members of staff at the University of Tasmania; especially to the members of the Classics Department, Dr Jonathan Wallis for putting up with my constant stream of questions with kindness and good grace and Dr Jayne Knight for her encouragement and support during the final stages of my candidature. The concept of this thesis was from my honours project in 2011. Dr Lara O’Sullivan from the University of Western Australia identified the potential for further academic investigation in this area; I sincerely thank her for the helpful comments and hope this work goes some way to fulfil the potential she saw.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes of the Rise in Violence in the Eastern Campaigns of Alexander the Great
    “Just Rage”: Causes of the Rise in Violence in the Eastern Campaigns of Alexander the Great _______________________________________ A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _____________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts _____________________________________________________ by Jenna Rice MAY 2014 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled “JUST RAGE”: CAUSES OF THE RISE IN VIOLENCE IN THE EASTERN CAMPAIGNS OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT presented by Jenna Rice, a candidate for the degree of master of history, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Professor Ian Worthington Professor Lawrence Okamura Professor LeeAnn Whites Professor Michael Barnes τῷ πατρί, ὅς ἐμοί τ'ἐπίστευε καὶ ἐπεκέλευε ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the members of my committee, Professors Worthington, Okamura, Whites, and Barnes, for the time they spent reading and considering my thesis during such a busy part of the semester. I received a number of thoughtful questions and suggestions of new methodologies which will prompt further research of my topic in the future. I am especially grateful to my advisor, Professor Worthington, for reading through and assessing many drafts of many chapters and for his willingness to discuss and debate the topic at length. I know that the advice I received throughout the editing process will serve me well in future research endeavors. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................ iv INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 Chapter 1. THE GREEK RULES OF WAR ..............................................................................5 2. ALEXANDER IN PERSIA ...................................................................................22 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Companion Cavalry and the Macedonian Heavy Infantry
    THE ARMY OP ALEXANDER THE GREAT %/ ROBERT LOCK IT'-'-i""*'?.} Submitted to satisfy the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. in the School of History in the University of Leeds. Supervisor: Professor E. Badian Date of Submission: Thursday 14 March 1974 IMAGING SERVICES NORTH X 5 Boston Spa, Wetherby </l *xj 1 West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ. * $ www.bl.uk BEST COPY AVAILABLE. TEXT IN ORIGINAL IS CLOSE TO THE EDGE OF THE PAGE ABSTRACT The army with which Alexander the Great conquered the Persian empire was "built around the Macedonian Companion cavalry and the Macedonian heavy infantry. The Macedonian nobility were traditionally fine horsemen, hut the infantry was poorly armed and badly organised until the reign of Alexander II in 369/8 B.C. This king formed a small royal standing army; it consisted of a cavalry force of Macedonian nobles, which he named the 'hetairoi' (or Companion]! cavalry, and an infantry body drawn from the commoners and trained to fight in phalangite formation: these he called the »pezetairoi» (or foot-companions). Philip II (359-336 B.C.) expanded the kingdom and greatly increased the manpower resources for war. Towards the end of his reign he started preparations for the invasion of the Persian empire and levied many more Macedonians than had hitherto been involved in the king's wars. In order to attach these men more closely to himself he extended the meaning of the terms »hetairol» and 'pezetairoi to refer to the whole bodies of Macedonian cavalry and heavy infantry which served under him on his campaigning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alexander-Achilles Connection: the Historical Dimension
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Best of the Macedonians: Alexander as Achilles in Arrian, Curtius, and Plutarch Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/76s9x3jv Author Vorhis, Justin Grant Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles The Best of the Macedonians: Alexander as Achilles in Arrian, Curtius, and Plutarch A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Classics by Justin Grant Vorhis 2017 © Copyright by Justin Grant Vorhis 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Best of the Macedonians: Alexander as Achilles in Arrian, Curtius, and Plutarch by Justin Grant Vorhis Doctor of Philosophy in Classics University of California, Los Angeles, 2017 Professor Kathryn Anne Morgan, Chair This dissertation concerns the connection between Alexander the Great (356-323 B.C.), the famous Macedonian king, and Achilles, the preeminent Greek hero of the Trojan War. As scholars have long recognized, Alexander’s connection to Achilles represents both a historical and a literary phenomenon: Alexander not only portrayed himself as a second Achilles, but was also portrayed as such by those who wrote about him. While scholars have traditionally concentrated on the connection’s historical dimension, I concentrate in this study on its literary dimension (the Achilles motif), taking Arrian, Curtius, and Plutarch, the three extant Alexander historians
    [Show full text]
  • “Alexander the Great: a Lesson Taught by Roman Historians” Jaxon Saunders Western Oregon University, [email protected]
    Western Oregon University Digital Commons@WOU Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) Department of History 2011 “Alexander the Great: A Lesson Taught by Roman Historians” Jaxon Saunders Western Oregon University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Saunders, Jaxon, "“Alexander the Great: A Lesson Taught by Roman Historians”" (2011). Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History). 100. https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his/100 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at Digital Commons@WOU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@WOU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Jaxon Saunders History 499 Senior Thesis June 13, 2011 © Jaxon Saunders, 2011 Alexander the Great: A Lesson Taught by Roman Historians ΣΤΟΝ ΚΑΛΛΙΤΕΡΟ ΠΑΝΕ ΤΑ ΛΑΦΥΡΑ ΤΗΣ ΓΝΩΣΗΣ (to the best goes the spoils of knowledge) Saunders 1 The image of Alexander the Great, “according to the many legends he was a king, a hero, a god, a conqueror, a philosopher, a scientist, a prophet, a statesman, and a visionary.”1 This is the story of Alexander the Great that is taught. The deeds of valor are truly awe-inspiring to those who take them at face value. Alexander is seen as a man who broke the mold. Libraries have been devoted to the study of Alexander. However, over the past sixty years scholars have become divided about their understanding of such a figure.
    [Show full text]
  • Philia Networks in the Macedonian Court and the Long Accession of Alexander the Great*
    Karanos 3, 2020 59-83 Philia Networks in the Macedonian Court and the Long Accession of Alexander the Great* by Julius Guthrie University of Exeter [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper revaluates key moments in the court politics of Alexander the Great’s reign through the introduction of philia-networks governed by gift-exchange as a template for explaining the relationships between key participants. This approach makes it clear that Alexander initially held a passive role in the political life of his own court and was dependant on others for his succession. These dynamics shifted in the opening years of the Asian expedition as Alexander sought to break these philia- networks, building his own and surrounding his person with philoi of his own choosing. KEYWORDS Alexander the Great, philia, Aristotle, court politics, conspiracies. To be a ruler in the ancient world was to be involved in a never-ending game of political chicanery with the elite. The Argead family of Macedonia, although the ruling house from at least the turn of the sixth into the fifth century, were no exception, and neither was the household’s most famous name: Alexander III the Great.1 Alexander, when his father, Philip II, died in 336 was by no means assured of succession to the Macedonian kingship. That Alexander did succeed was due to his support from prominent men – especially Antipater and Parmenio– who controlled vast networks of philoi. The recognition of the role played by prominent political factions in Alexander’s court is itself nothing new and most recently Waldemar Heckel has argued for the existence of political factions centred on both Antipater and Parmenio at Alexander’s court2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Death of Clitus , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 22:2 (1981:Summer) P.149
    CARNEY, ELIZABETH, The Death of Clitus , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 22:2 (1981:Summer) p.149 The Death of Clitus Elizabeth Carney T THE END of a long drunken quarrel, Alexander, king of A Macedonia, murdered Clitus, co-commander of the aristo­ cratic Companion cavalry. The dispute took place at a ban­ quet in Maracanda, in Sogdiana, late in 328 B.C. 1 There has been a tendency to treat this event briefly, and not to explore at any length the motivation of the two combatants. Because the killing of Clitus was clearly an unpremeditated act, it has suffered neglect, probably because of comparison with the elimination of Parmenio and Philotas in 333, an act of policy, calculated and judicially justified. While Clitus' killing was not an act of policy, it was both more personal and more political than has previously been seen. Of Clitus' career before the quarrel in Maracanda little is known, and much of what is known can be interpreted in several ways. Clitus, son of Dropidas, was the brother of Lanice, Alexander's be­ loved nurse (Arr. 4.9.3; Curt. 8.1.21; Just. 12.6.10). Clitus served with distinction under Philip (Curt. 8.1.20). He commanded the Royal Squadron, the elite unit of the Companion cavalry, from the beginning of Alexander's reign, and possibly earlier (Arr. 3.11.8). His territorial origin is unknown, but we do have some more infor­ mation about his family, or at least that of his sister. We shall re­ turn to his sister's family below, but here it is enough to say that, including Clitus, at least three members of the clan were on nearly familial terms with the young king.
    [Show full text]