DOCSLIB.ORG

Tungsten Deposits of Gila, Yavapai, and Mohave Counties, Arizona I.C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tungsten Deposits of Gila, Yavapai, and Mohave Counties, Arizona I.C A,--+ u- bureau of mines IC infc rmation circu!ar 8073 TUNGSTEN DEPOSITS OF GILA, YAVAPAI, AND MOHAVE COUNTIES, ARIZ. By V. B. Dale - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF MINES 1961 TUNGSTEN DEPOSITS OF GILA, YAVAPAI, AND MOHAVE COUNTIES, ARIZ. By V. B. Dale UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Stewart L. Udall, Secretary BUREAU OF MINES Marling J. Ankeny, Director This publication has been cataloged as follows: Dale, Vernon B Tungsten deposits of Gila, Yavapai, and Mohave counties, Ariz. [Washington] US. Dept.of the Interior, Bureau of Mines [I9611 v, 104 p. illus., mTs. 26 cm. (U.S. Bureau of Mines. Information circulor 8078) I 1. Tungsten ores - Arir. I. Title. (Series) i TN23.U71 no. 8078 622.06173 I US. Dept. 01 the Int. Library. CONTENTS Introduction and summary .................................. Acknowledgments ........................................... Description of deposits................................... Gila County .......................................... Pinal Mountains ................................. Bobtai'l group (Mariana mine) ............... Samsel mine ................................ Rastar claims .............................. Other deposits............................. Pinto Creek region .............................. Wagner group............................... Other deposits............................. Mazatzal Mountains .............................. El Oso group............................... Mazatzal group (Jolene or Cline group) ..... Other deposits ............................. Spring Creek .................................... Rose Tungsten group ........................ Globe-Miami vicinity............................ Yavapai County ....................................... Bradshaw Mountains .............................. White Pearl prospect ....................... Evelyn-Cordella group ...................... Lucky Bud prospect ......................... Mammoth prospect ........................... Lucky Star claim ........................... What-A-Pal prospect ........................ North Star and Money Maker group ........... H . S . Tungsten claims ...................... Tip Top district................................ Tip Top mine ............................... Mayby prospect ............................. Great Cross Cut claims ..................... Castle Creek area ............................... P and G claims ............................. Dahlia group ............................... C and W claims ............................. Joyce K group .............................. Jonell group............................... White Picacho district.......................... Scheelite Reef prospect .................... Climax prospect ............................ Starlight (formerly Buena Vista) group ..... Congress area ................................... Gray Fox prospect .......................... Mesa Grande Addition prospect .............. CONTENTS (Con .) Bagdad area ..................................... Black Magic group .......................... Black Pearl mine ........................... Margie C . (CTM) and Black Diamond group .... South Side group ........................... Tungstona mine ............................. Green Back group ........................... Zannarapolis group ......................... New Hope (Good Luck) prospect .............. Camp Verde district ............................. Tungsten King prospect ..................... Mohave County ........................................ Greenwood district .............................. Lost mine .................................. Aquarius Mountains .............................. Williams (Wothree) mine .................... Berger Phillips property (Curley group) .... Three-in-One prospect ...................... Hualpai Mountains ............................... Midwav. .~ros~ect ............................ Farley-VanLee lease ........ Boriana mine ............... Bull Canyon group (Iguana c Tungstite group ............ Lentz Black Rock group ..... Oohir claims ................ ............... Murphy Tungsten group ...................... Laxton area ................................ Blue Bell group ............................ Telluride Chief ............................ Florescent prospect ........................ Hackberry area .................................. Black Rock prospect ........................ White Tail prospect ........................ Buck Horn (Zon h el) prospect ............... Lucky Girl prospect ........................ Yellow Bird prospect ......... Music Mountain tungsten prospect .. Tungstake (Ba Ba) prospect ....... Mohave Mountains ................. Dutch Flats tungsten prospec Other deposits ............... O . K . Mine ........................ iii ILLUSTRATIONS 1. Location map, tungsten deposits in Globe area, Gila County, Ariz.................................. 2. Geologic map, Bobtail prospect, Gila County, Ariz.... 3. Assay map, ~ungstentunnel, Bobtail group ............ 4. Claim map, Wagner tungsten prospect, Gila County, Ariz............................................... 5. Location map, Mazatzal tungsten district, Gila County, Ariz........................................ 6. Claim map, El Oso group.............................. 7. Assay map, El Oso and El Oso No. 1 tungsten .......... 8. Assay map, El Oso No. 4 tungsten ..................... 9. Tunnel, El Oso tungsten. ............................. 10. Transit-stadia survey, El Oso No. 7 tungsten claim... 11. Transit-stadia survey, Jolene tungsten, Gila County, Ariz............................................... 12. Location map, Rose tungsten deposit, Gila County, Ariz............................................... 13. Location map, tungsten deposits, Bradshaw Mountains, Yavapai County, Ariz............................... 14. H. S. Tungsten mine, Yavapai County, Ariz.. ....... 15. Location map, tungsten deposits in Tip Top, Castle Creek, and White Picacho districts, Yavapai County, Ariz............................................... i 16. Location map, Gray Fox and Mesa Grande Addition prospects, Yavapai County, Ariz..................... I 17. Location map, tungsten deposits in Bagdad area, Yavapai County, Ariz............................... 18. Topographic and claim map, Black Pearl mine, Yavapai County, Ariz............................... ILLUSTRATIONS (Con. ) Black Pearl mine, Yavapai County, Ariz............... Plan and assay map, west end of Black Pearl mine, Yavapai County, Ariz...................... ......... Plan and assay map, east end of Black Pearl mine, Yavapai County, Ariz............. .................. Claim map, Tungstona mine, Yavapai County, Ariz...... Mine workings, Tungstona mine, Yavapai County, Ariz.. Topographic map, Tungstona mine, Yavapai County, Ariz ............................................... Mill flowsheet, Tungstona mine, Yavapai County, Ariz. Geologic and assay map, Greenback tungsten deposit, Yavapai County, Ariz............................... Flowsheet, Zannarapolis crushing plant ............... Flowsheet, Zannarapolis mill......................... Location map, Tungsten King prospect, Yavapai County, Ariz. ...................................... Location map, Lost mine and Aquarius Range deposits, Mohave County, Ariz.............. .................. Location map, deposits in the Huaipai Mountains, Mohave County, Ariz.............. .................. Plan of underground workings, Boriana mine........... Longitudinal projection of Boriana mine workings ..... Flowsheet, Boriana mill......................... ..... Topographic and geologic map, Boriana mine, Mohave County, Ariz.............. .................. Ore shoot at Boriana, Ariz........................... Location map, tungsten deposits near Hackberry, Mohave County, Ariz................................ ILLUSTRATIONS (Con. ) 38. Location map, Music Mountain and Tungstake prospects, northern Mohave County, Ariz............ 100 39. Location map, Dutch Flats tungsten prospects, Mohave County, Ariz................................ 102 40. Dutch Flats tungsten, partial claim map.............. 103 TUNGSTEN DEPOSITS OF GILA, YAVAPAI, AND MOHAVE COUNTIES, ARIL~' INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY This report is one of a series covering the mineral resources of the Nation. It briefly describes most of the known tungsten deposits in Gila, Yavapai, and Mohave Counties, Ariz. Many of the descriptions are taken from the reports of previous examinations by Bureau of Mines engineers, and from Defense Minerals Exploration Administration files. Where a pre- vious examination had been made, and an inquiry disclosed that little or no work had been done since that time, pertinent information from the report was used in this paper with acknowledgment of the source. However, the majority of the descriptions is from field examinations by the author. In the past 3 years (July 1956-May 1959) only necessary annual assess- ment work was conducted on nearly all the properties described in this paper. There was no active mining on any of the properties examined. Production figures are given for each deposit, where known, and for each county. Ore reserve estimates are made for the individual counties. The reader should bear in mind that most of the deposits are raw prospects and that virtually all ores were removed as they were encountered. At only three properties has there been any development work; most of the properties contained only shallow surface diggings. Tungsten mineralization was very sporadic and discontinuous in all deposits that were examined.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan
    Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan Adopted August 16, 2004 Maricopa Trail Maricopa County Trail Commission Maricopa County Department of Transportation Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Maricopa County Planning and Development Flood Control District of Maricopa County We have an obligation to protect open spaces for future generations. Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan VISION Our vision is to connect the majestic open spaces of the Maricopa County Regional Parks with a nonmotorized trail system. The Maricopa Trail Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan - page 1 Credits Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Andrew Kunasek, District 3, Chairman Fulton Brock, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Max Wilson, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 Maricopa County Trail Commission Supervisor Max Wilson, District 4 Chairman Supervisor Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Parks Commission Members: Citizen Members: Laurel Arndt, Chair Art Wirtz, District 2 Randy Virden, Vice-Chair Jim Burke, District 3 Felipe Zubia, District 5 Stakeholders: Carol Erwin, Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) Fred Pfeifer, Arizona Public Service (APS) James Duncan, Salt River Project (SRP) Teri Raml, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Ex-officio Members: William Scalzo, Chief Community Services Officer Pictured from left to right Laurel Arndt, Supervisor Andy Kunasek, Fred Pfeifer, Carol Erwin, Arizona’s Official State Historian, Marshall Trimble, and Art Wirtz pose with the commemorative branded trail marker Mike Ellegood, Director, Public Works at the Maricopa Trail
    [Show full text]
  • Coconino National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan Document the Analysis and Decisions Resulting from the Planning Process
    ' " United States (. Il). Department of \~~!J'~~':P Agriculture CoconinoNational Forest Service ForestPlan Southwestern Region -""""" IU!S. IIIII.IIIIII... I I i I--- I I II I /"r, Vicinity Map @ , " .. .' , ",', '. ',,' , ". ,.' , ' ' .. .' ':':: ~'::.»>::~: '::. Published August 1987 Coconino N.ational Forest Land and Resource Management Plan This Page Intentionally Left Blank Coconino Foresst Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Plan. 1 Organization of the Forest Plan Documentation. 2 Planning Area Description. 2 2. ISSUES Overview . 5 Issues . 5 Firewood . 6 Timber Harvest Levels. 7 The Availability of Recreation Options . 8 Off-Road Driving . 9 Wildlife Habitat . 9 Riparian Habitat . 11 Geothermal Development . .. 11 Management of the Transportation System . 12 Use of the Public Lands . 13 Law Enforcement . 13 Landownership Adjustment . 14 Opportunities . 14 Public Affairs . 14 Volunteers . 15 3. SUMMARY OF THE ANALYSIS OF THE MANAGEMENT SITUATION Overview . 17 Prior Allocations . 18 4. MANAGEMENT DIRECTION Overview . 21 Mission . 21 Goals . 21 Objectives . 26 Regional Guide/Forest Plan . 26 Outputs & Range of Implementation . 26 Management Prescriptions . 46 Management Area Description . 46 Management Emphasis . 46 Program Components . 46 Activities . .. 47 Standards and Guidelines . 47 How to Apply Prescriptions . .. 47 Coordinating Requirements . .. 47 Coconino National Forest Plan – Partial Cancellation of Amendment No. 15 -3/05 Replacement Page i Coconino Forest Plan Table of Contents continued Standards and Guidelines . 51 Forest-wide . 51 MA 1 Wildernesses . 98 MA 2 Verde Wild and Scenic River . .. 113 MA 3 Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, Less Than 40 Percent Slopes. .. 116 MA 4 Ponderosa Pine and Mixed Conifer, Greater Than 40 Percent Slopes. 138 MA 5 Aspen . 141 MA 6 Unproductive Timber Land .
    [Show full text]
  • Kaibab National Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Kaibab National Forest Forest Service Southwestern Potential Wilderness Area Region September 2013 Evaluation Report The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover photo: Kanab Creek Wilderness Kaibab National Forest Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Inventory of Potential Wilderness Areas .................................................................................................. 2 Evaluation of Potential Wilderness Areas ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Evolution of the Mcdowell Mountains Maricopa County
    Structural Evolution of the McDowell Mountains Maricopa County, Arizona by Brad Vance A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Approved November 2012 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Stephen Reynolds, Chair Steven Semken Edmund Stump ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY December 2012 ABSTRACT The accretion of juvenile island-arc lithosphere by convergent tectonism during the Paleoproterozoic, in conjunction with felsic volcanism, resulted in the assembly, ductile to partial brittle deformation, uplift, and northwest-directed thrusting of rocks in the McDowell Mountains region and adjacent areas in the Mazatzal Orogenic belt. Utilizing lithologic characteristics and petrographic analysis of the Proterozoic bedrock, a correlation to the Alder series was established, revising the stratigraphic sequences described by earlier works. The central fold belt, composed of an open, asymmetric syncline and an overturned, isoclinal anticline, is cut by an axial-plane parallel reactivated thrust zone that is intruded by a deformed Paleoproterozoic mafic dike. Finite strain analyses of fold geometries, shear fabrics, foliations, fold vergence, and strained clasts point to Paleoproterozoic northwest-directed thrusting associated with the Mazatzal orogen at approximately 1650 million years ago. Previous studies constrained the regional P-T conditions to at least the upper andalusite-kyanite boundary at peak metamorphic conditions, which ranged from 4-6 kilobars and 350-450⁰ Celsius, although the plasticity of deformation in a large anticlinal core suggests that this represents the low end of the P-T conditions. Subsequent to deformation, the rocks were intruded by several granitoid plutons, likely of Mesoproterozoic age (1300-1400 Ma). A detailed analysis of Proterozoic strain solidly places the structure of the McDowell Mountains within the confines of the Mazatzal Orogeny, pending any contradictory geochronological data.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Change in Aravaipa, 1870 - 1970 an Ethnoecological Survey
    BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT ARIZONA - Environmental Change in Aravaipa, 1870 - 1970 An Ethnoecological Survey Diana Hadley Peter Warshall Don Bufkin CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES No. 7 1991 Environmental Change in Aravaipa, 1870 - 1970 An Ethnoecological Survey Prepared by Hadley Associates Diana Hadley, Historian Peter Warshall, Ph.D., Ecologist Don Bufkin, Cartographer Cultural Resource Series Monograph No. 7 Published by the Arizona State Office of the Bureau of Land Management 3707 N. 7th Street Phoenix, Arizona 85014 September 1991 EDITOR'S FORWARD The preface to this document expresses the hope that this ethnoecological survey of Aravaipa " . will provide local managers with a greater time- depth and feeling for the ways in which humans and natural events have intertwined to shape Aravaipa's present condition and the appearance of Aravaipa's resources. Wise future management cannot be divorced from the cumulative impacts and decisions of the past. Future management can benefit from the knowledge, the admitted mistakes, and beneficial decisions made by former residents." I cannot think of a clearer statement of the manner in which cultural resource information can be made relevant to our lives today. Archaeologists and historians are often asked to justify the usefulness of their efforts in relation to the realities of modern-day living. In response, we say that the lessons of the past can teach us how to live better in the present. By building on the successes of those who came before us, and avoiding mistakes that they have made, we can do a better job of managing our resources now and can plan more effectively for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • White Tank Mountain Regional Park
    White Tank Mountain Regional Park Master Plan Update 2014-2034 {This page intentionally left blank.} {This page intentionally left blank.} {This page intentionally left blank.} Acknowledgements This master plan update was a collaborative process that involved the guidance and expertise of many. The Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Department would like to thank the Planning Team who committed their time to monthly meetings and document review; likewise to the Stakeholder Advisory Group who took time out of their personal lives to provide their invaluable input. Planning Team Stakeholder Advisory Group R.J. Cardin, Director Jamil Coury Jennifer Waller, Operations Manager Linda Gilgosch Jennifer Johnston, West Side Superintendent John Pesock Raymond Schell, Park Supervisor Frank Salowitz Michele Kogl, Planning and Development Manager Allen Ockenfels, Trails Development Manager Fareed Abou-Haidar, GIS Technician Leigh Johnson, Park Planner This Master Plan update was also made possible by the contributions and guidance of the following: • Maricopa County Board of Supervisors o Denny Barney, District 1 o Steve Chucri, District 2 o Andy Kunasek, District 3 o Clint L. Hickman, District 4 o Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 • Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Commission o Jack Stapley, District 2 o Anne Lynch, District 3 o Dr. Robert Branch, District 4 o Carlton Yoshioka , Member-at-Large o Rod Jarvis, Member-at-Large • Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Department staff • Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, Mountain Patrol Division • Bill “Doc” Talboys, Interpretive Ranger, MCPRD (retired) • Shelly Rasmussen, Interpretive Ranger, MCPRD (retired) • Public meeting participants The Department would also like to thank its agency partners at the City of Surprise, City of Buckeye, Arizona Game and Fish Department, and the Bureau of Land Management - Phoenix District Office for their input and guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Geology of the Santan Mountains, Pinal and Maricopa
    BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF THE SANTAN MOUNTAINS,PINAL AND MARICOPA COUNTIES, ARIZONA by Charles A. Ferguson, and Steven J. Skotnicki Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-9 June 1996 Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, Suite #100, Tucson, Arizona 85701 Includes 1:24,000 scale geologic map, cross-sections (2 sheets), and 22 page text Jointly funded by the Arizona Geological Survey and the u.S. Geological Survey STATEMAP Program Contract#1434-95-A-1353 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Arizona Geological Survey standardS 2 INTRODUCTION The Santan Mountains are a 25 Ian long, west-northwest trending uplift composed chiefly of Proterozoic and Cretaceous crystalline rocks overlain in the central and eastern part of the range by Mid-Tertiary sedimentary and volcanic rocks. Santan Mountain at an elevation of 3010 feet is the range's highest point, rising nearly 1700 feet above the basin floor. Elevations decrease rapidly to the southeast towards the Gila River. The eastern two thirds of the range are composed of low hills connected by extensive areas of pedimented bedrock where relief is rarely greater than 400 feet. The range is bounded to the north by the Higley basin, and no extensive, pedimented bedrock surfaces exist here. Instead, abrupt thickening of the basin fill is suggested by the numerous earth fissures along the range's north edge (Harris, 1994; Sank, 1975). To the south, like the east, an extensive dissected granitic pediment extends all the way to the Gila river. Extensive pediments in the Sacaton Mountains to the southwest also probably extend northward to the Gila River, suggesting that the low area between the two ranges was created more by erosional processes than by tectonic processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Hike Database
    Hike Database October 1, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Subject Page 1 General Information 3 2 Hike Ratings, Pace, and Elevation Change 5 3 Special Conditions 7 4 Glossary 8 5 Hike Descriptions 9 Agua Caliente Hill / La Milagrosa Ridge / Molino Basin… 10 Babad Do‟ag Trail 26 Cactus Forest Area 31 David Yetman Trail 35 El Capitan Canyon (lower) 37 Fifty-Year Trail Area Loop 38 Gardner Canyon to Kentucky Camp 40 Hamburg Trail 43 Incinerator Ridge 45 Josephine Peak 45 Kentucky Camp Hike and Hot Dog Cookout 46 La Milagrosa Ridge / AZT from Redington Rd. 47 Madera Canyon Kent Springs - Bog Springs Loop 48 Newman Peak 55 Oracle Ridge / Red Ridge Loop 55 Palisade Trail / Mud Spring 56 Quantrell Mine 62 Ragged Top / Silverbell Mountains 62 Sabino Canyon - Bear Canyon Loop (no Trams) 64 Table Mountain 75 Ventana Canyon – Lower Level 79 Wasson Peak at Sunset and Moonrise 80 6 Hikes by Area and Number 83 Hikes by Area 83 Hikes Sorted by Number 88 7 Driving Directions 93 8 References 97 October 1, 2011 Page 2 GENERAL INFORMATION All hikes leave from the first, left (when entering from MountainView Blvd.) parking lot in front of the MountainView Clubhouse (just east of the tennis courts), unless otherwise noted. Voluntary driver donations will be shown in the “Hikes Offered” table in the Club Newsletter. These costs will change from time to time with significant fluctuations in gasoline prices. There may be other fees for tram shuttles, entry to areas such as national parks, monuments, wilderness areas, special tours and exhibits, permits, state parks, overnight stays, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Geological Survey | 2Mcdowell Sonoran Field Institute
    QUARTZ VEIN INVESTIGATION, MCDOWELL SONORAN PRESERVE, SCOTTSDALE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA Brian F. Gootee1 & Daniel G. Gruber2 1Arizona Geological Survey | 2McDowell Sonoran Field Institute State geological survey employees collecting geothermal data. OPEN-FILE REPORT OFR-15-03 July 2015 Arizona Geological Survey www.azgs.az.gov | repository.azgs.az.gov Arizona Geological Survey M. Lee Allison, State Geologist and Director Manuscript approved for publication in July 2015 Printed by the Arizona Geological Survey All rights reserved For an electronic copy of this publication: www.repository.azgs.az.gov Printed copies are on sale at the Arizona Experience Store 416 W. Congress, Tucson, AZ 85701 (520.770.3500) For information on the mission, objectives or geologic products of the Arizona Geological Survey visit www.azgs.az.gov. This publication was prepared by an agency of the State of Arizona. The State of Arizona, or any agency thereof, or any of their employees, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report. Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the State of Arizona. ___________________________ Recommended Citation: Gootee, B.F. and Gruber, D.G., 2015, Quartz vein investigation, McDowell Sonoran Preserve, Scottsdale, Maricopa County, Arizona. Arizona Geological Survey Open File Report,
    [Show full text]
  • WEB 01-20 GYMOAZ-01-20The Monument Man V3-Annemarie
    The Monument Man – “Wood” Treasure Hunting in the Salt River Mountains by Annemarie Eveland I like hiking and I am enchanted with the Superstition Mountains and our Four Peaks area. So, when I heard about someone who had spent twenty-some years investigating historical Spanish monuments in these areas, I went to investigate. This is part of the interview with “Wood”, the monument man. AE: Tell me about yourself. Why do they call you” Wood,” the monument man? W: I am nicknamed WOOD because it is part of my middle name. I have had an intense fascination with -- and have done extensive, long-time research on the monuments of the Southwest. These monuments were created first by Indians, then secondly by Spaniards and Jesuits marking their trails. In 1978, I started seriously hiking in the wilderness of the Superstition Mountains and the Four Peaks areas. I was 22 years old then. I backpacked -- sometimes a week at a time -- exploring and photographing the surrounding nature that I came upon. Along the trails in these different areas, I noticed rocks that resembled Indian heads -- and a myriad of different animals -- such as turtles, snakes, dogs and such. Upon closer inspection, I began to realize that these had been created by unknown hands. They were chiseled and fashioned by persons unknown to me at that time. With many of the ones that I inspected, I noticed they had a common theme. It showed the general direction to take -- or the eyes on the animals were pointing in certain directions. After years of taking pictures and studying these monuments, I came to the realization that many of them were very old and Jesuit and Spanish in nature, leading to different locations in the mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation and Flora of the Mcdowell Sonoran Preserve, Maricopa County, Arizona
    VEGETATION AND FLORA OF THE MCDOWELL SONORAN PRESERVE, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA Steve Jones and Chelsey Hull McDowell Sonoran Conservancy 16345 N. Scottsdale Rd. Suite 110 Scottsdale, AZ 85254 ABSTRACT This study is part of an effort to establish a baseline assessment of the biotic condition of the City of Scottsdale’s McDowell Sonoran Preserve. The study area is in northeastern Scottsdale and includes the McDowell Mountain range and areas to the north of the range. In total, 379 taxa in 61 families were identified between February 2011 and September 2013. The McDowell Sonoran Conservancy's Field Institute trained volunteer citizen scientists to participate in collecting specimens for the study. Seedbank samples were collected and cultivated in a greenhouse to simulate a wet spring season. Plant families with the largest presence in the preserve include Asteraceae (65 taxa), Poaceae (49), Fabaceae (19), Boraginaceae (22), and Cactaceae (17). Major biotic communities were identified and described. INTRODUCTION In 1995 and 2004, the citizens of the City of Scottsdale approved taxation mechanisms for funding the purchase of the McDowell Mountains and surrounding lands. As the land was assembled, the City designated it the McDowell Sonoran Preserve (MSP). Assemblage of the preserve is ongoing. This study is part of a larger baseline assessment of the biotic condition of the MSP, and of land under consideration for addition to the MSP. Assessments of arthropods, reptiles, birds and mammals were undertaken at roughly the same time. The studies were organized under the auspices of the McDowell Sonoran Field Institute (MSFI), the research center of the McDowell Sonoran Conservancy (MSC).
    [Show full text]
  • Sbhc Hike Database 06-01-10
    Hike Database June 1, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Subject Page 1 General Information 3 2 Hike Ratings, Pace, and Elevation Change 4 3 Special Conditions 5 4 Glossary 6 5 Hike Descriptions 7 Agua Caliente Hill / La Milagrosa Ridge / Molino Basin 8 Babad Do‟ag Trail 15 Cactus Forest Area 20 David Yetman Trail 24 El Capitan Canyon (lower) 25 Fifty-Year Trail - North End 26 Gardner Canyon to Kentucky Camp 28 Hamburg Trail 31 Incinerator Ridge 32 Josephine Peak 33 King Canyon Loop 33 La Milagrosa Ridge/AZT from Redington Rd. 34 Madera Canyon Kent Springs - Bog Springs Loop 35 Nugget Canyon (short version) 40 Oracle Ridge / Red Ridge Loop 41 Palisade Trail / Mud Spring 42 Quantrell Mine 47 Ragged Top / Silverbell Mountains 48 Sabino Canyon - Bear Canyon Loop (no Trams) 50 Table Mountain 60 Ventana Canyon - Lower Level 64 Wasson Peak at Sunset and Moonrise 64 6 Hikes by Area and Number 67 Hikes by Area 67 Hikes Sorted by Number 71 7 Driving Directions 76 8 References 80 June 1, 2010 Page 2 GENERAL INFORMATION All hikes leave from the first, left (when entering from MountainView Blvd.) parking lot in front of the MountainView Clubhouse (just east of the tennis courts), unless otherwise noted. Voluntary driver donations will be shown in the “Hikes Offered” table in the Club Newsletter. These costs will change from time to time with significant fluctuations in gasoline prices. There may be other fees for tram shuttles, entry to areas such as national parks, monuments, wilderness areas, special tours and exhibits, permits, state parks, overnight stays, etc.
    [Show full text]