Structural Evolution of the Mcdowell Mountains Maricopa County

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Structural Evolution of the Mcdowell Mountains Maricopa County Structural Evolution of the McDowell Mountains Maricopa County, Arizona by Brad Vance A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Approved November 2012 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Stephen Reynolds, Chair Steven Semken Edmund Stump ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY December 2012 ABSTRACT The accretion of juvenile island-arc lithosphere by convergent tectonism during the Paleoproterozoic, in conjunction with felsic volcanism, resulted in the assembly, ductile to partial brittle deformation, uplift, and northwest-directed thrusting of rocks in the McDowell Mountains region and adjacent areas in the Mazatzal Orogenic belt. Utilizing lithologic characteristics and petrographic analysis of the Proterozoic bedrock, a correlation to the Alder series was established, revising the stratigraphic sequences described by earlier works. The central fold belt, composed of an open, asymmetric syncline and an overturned, isoclinal anticline, is cut by an axial-plane parallel reactivated thrust zone that is intruded by a deformed Paleoproterozoic mafic dike. Finite strain analyses of fold geometries, shear fabrics, foliations, fold vergence, and strained clasts point to Paleoproterozoic northwest-directed thrusting associated with the Mazatzal orogen at approximately 1650 million years ago. Previous studies constrained the regional P-T conditions to at least the upper andalusite-kyanite boundary at peak metamorphic conditions, which ranged from 4-6 kilobars and 350-450⁰ Celsius, although the plasticity of deformation in a large anticlinal core suggests that this represents the low end of the P-T conditions. Subsequent to deformation, the rocks were intruded by several granitoid plutons, likely of Mesoproterozoic age (1300-1400 Ma). A detailed analysis of Proterozoic strain solidly places the structure of the McDowell Mountains within the confines of the Mazatzal Orogeny, pending any contradictory geochronological data. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I extend a heartfelt thank you to my advisor and mentor, Stephen J. Reynolds, for his good-natured hands-off approach that allowed me to sort things out on my own, and for stepping in with his extensive expertise at the perfect times when I most needed it. Many thanks to my committee members, Steve Semken and Ed Stump, for their invaluable input along the way; to Paul Knauth for his open-door policy and insight into microstructures; to Julia Johnson, the perfect commiserative cohort and ear to the ground, who afforded me not only the first opportunity to teach, but great insight as well; to Dr. William M. Jacobsen, MD, whose flexibility and support over these years were instrumental in achieving my goals; and of course to all my professors for preparing me for such an undertaking. My appreciation also goes to Steven J. Skotnicki for his prior and current work in the McDowell Mountains, and for his enthusiasm for understanding the history of these elegant mountains. My mother Billie, brother Sean, and sister Shelly deserve special recognition not only for their encouragement, but simply for whom they are and what they have always meant to me. You are my inspiration. Finally, my most sincere gratitude to you, Daniel Wright, partner and best friend, for your unfailing support and unflinching criticism, without which I could not have succeeded. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................... vii INTRODUCTION......................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Scope .............................................................................. 1 Geographic Setting ............................................................................. 1 Physiography....................................................................................... 2 Previous Work .................................................................................... 7 Methods of Investigation .................................................................... 9 Conventions ........................................................................................ 9 Abbreviations and Nomenclature ..................................................... 10 GEOLOGY AND STRATIGRAPHY ....................................................... 11 General Bedrock Geology ................................................................ 11 Surficial Geology .............................................................................. 12 Stratigraphy ....................................................................................... 12 Paleoproterozoic Rocks .....................................................16 Mesoproterozoic Rocks .....................................................29 Tertiary Rocks ...................................................................32 STRUCTURE .............................................................................................. 34 General Statement ............................................................................. 34 iii Page Bedding ............................................................................................. 34 Foliation ............................................................................................ 35 Lineations .......................................................................................... 42 Faults ................................................................................................. 45 Hydrothermal Veins.......................................................................... 45 Joints .............................................................................................46 Strained Clasts .................................................................................. 48 Shear Fabrics ..................................................................................... 55 Central Fold Belt ............................................................................... 55 Horseshoe Ridge syncline ..................................................55 Dixie Mine anticline ..........................................................58 Dixie Mine .........................................................................63 Microstructure ................................................................................... 66 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................. 74 General Statement ............................................................................. 74 Proterozoic Accretion ....................................................................... 74 Volcanism and Sedimentation .......................................................... 79 Metamorphism .................................................................................. 80 Mazatzal Orogeny ............................................................................. 82 Fold Relationships .............................................................86 Shear Bands and Heterogeneous Softening .......................91 iv Page Intrusives ........................................................................................... 92 Unconstrained Structures .................................................................. 93 Tertiary Structure .............................................................................. 93 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................... 96 REFERENCES ............................................................................................ 98 APPENDIX A ........................................................................................... 102 FOLIATION AND BEDDING DATA TABLES ......................... 103 APPENDIX B............................................................................................ 112 PETROGRAPHIC THIN SECTIONS........................................... 113 APPENDIX C............................................................................................ 114 GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE MCDOWELL MOUNTAINS ........ 115 v LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Summary of Foliation and Fold Orientations ..................................... 47 2. Ratios of Strain Axes in Deformed Clasts .......................................... 52 3. Ri and Rf Strain Axes Ratios of the Metaconglomerate Clasts ......... 52 4. Sample Locations in the metasedimentary, metavolcanic, and felsite units ..................................................................................................... 69 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Regional map and study area ................................................................ 3 2. Shaded relief map of elevation ............................................................... 4 3. Facing NW from the Dixie Mine ridge ................................................... 5 4. View of Thompson Peak ........................................................................ 6 5. Geographic features map ........................................................................ 7 6. Generalized stratigraphy ..................................................................... 13 7. Red quartzite . ....................................................................................... 24 8. Red and gray quartzite contact ............................................................ 25 9. Felsic member of
Recommended publications
  • Geologic Map of the Goldfield Quadrangle and the Northern Part of the Superstitton Mts
    GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE GOLDFIELD QUADRANGLE AND THE NORTHERN PART OF THE SUPERSTITTON MTS. SW QUADRANGLES, MARICOPA AND PINAL COUNTIES, ARIZONA by Steven J. Skotnicki and Charles A. Ferguson Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 95-9 August, 1995 Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, Suite #100, Tucson, Arizona 85701 Includes 26 page text and 1:24,000 scale geologic map (2 sheets). Jointly funded by the Arizona Geological Survey and the U.S. Geological Survey STATEMAP Program. Contract #1434-94-A-1222 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Arizona Geological Survey standards INTRODUCTION The Goldfield Quadrangle and Superstition Mountains are located about 40 km due east of Phoenix, Arizona, and a few miles east of Apache Junction, and include part of the Superstition Wilderness Area (Figure 1). Aerially extensive exposures of welded tuff fonn steep, rugged cliffs in the Superstition Mountains and overlie tilted felsic and mafic volcanic rocks, pre-volcanic cconglomerate, and Precambrian granite and Pinal Schist. This study was carried out concurrently with mapping in the Florence Junction Quadrangle and the southern part of the Weaver's Needle Quadrangle. Mapping in the Goldfield Quadrangle continued from January through April, 1995. The project was jointly funded by the Arizona Geological Survey and the U.S. Geological Survey under the STATEMAP Project, contract #1434-94-A- 1222. ACCESS Much of the region lies within the Tonto National Forest. Within the study area there are only a few roads which penetrate any distance into the mountains. Highway 60/89 and State Route 88 (the Apache Trail) are the best avenues and afford some of the best views of the western escarpment of the range (Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Big Bug Watershed: Money Metals and Providence Mines Bradshaw Mountains Prescott National Forest, Arizona
    Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis Big Bug Watershed: Money Metals and Providence Mines Bradshaw Mountains Prescott National Forest, Arizona Prepared for: USDA Forest Service 333 Broadway SE Albuquerque, NM 87102 Prepared by: Weston Solutions, Inc. 960 West Elliot Road, Suite 201 Tempe, Arizona 85284 Contract No. AG-8371-D-09-0191 December 2010 Final Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis Big Bug Watershed: Money Metals and Providence Mines Bradshaw Mountains, Prescott National Forest, Arizona December 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................E1 1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................... 1 1.2 AREA POPULATION ............................................................................................................. 2 1.3 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS ............................................................................................. 2 1.3.1 Geologic and Hydrologic Setting .......................................................................... 2 1.3.1.1 Hydrology ................................................................................................. 3 1.3.2 Regional Climate ................................................................................................... 4 1.4 SITE OPERATION
    [Show full text]
  • Microstructure of Selected Metamorphic Rock Types – Application of Petrographic Image Analysis
    Acta Geodyn. Geomater., Vol. 7, No. 4 (160), 431–443, 2010 MICROSTRUCTURE OF SELECTED METAMORPHIC ROCK TYPES – APPLICATION OF PETROGRAPHIC IMAGE ANALYSIS Šárka ŠACHLOVÁ 1,2)*, Vladimír SCHENK 2) and Zdeňka SCHENKOVÁ 2) 1) Institute of Geochemistry, Mineralogy and Mineral Resources, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Albertov 6, 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic 2) Institute of Rock Structure and Mechanics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., V Holešovičkách 41, 182 09 Prague, Czech Republic *Corresponding author‘s e-mail: [email protected] (Received August 2010, accepted November 2010) ABSTRACT Microscopic techniques, such as polarising microscopy and scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectrometer (SEM/EDS), were used in combination with petrographic image analysis with the aim of a quantitative determination of the mineral composition, rock microstructure, and degree of metamorphism of selected quartz-rich metamorphic rock types. Sampled orthogneiss rock types are mainly composed of feldspar, quartz, biotite, and amphibole. The grains are less isometric, elongated, having smooth boundaries, and showing a weak preferential orientation. The deformation and recrystallization characteristics of quartz indicate high-temperature recrystallization (the grain boundary migration recrystallization mechanism). Schist and phyllite rock types are preferentially very-fine to fine-grained, showing a strong shape preferred orientation. Their sedimentary origin was indicated by the presence of graphite.
    [Show full text]
  • Sonoran Preserve Master Plan
    City of Phoenix Sonoran Preserve Master Plan City of Phoenix Sonoran Preserve Sonoran Preserve Master Plan An Open Space Plan for the Phoenix Sonoran Desert HCDE Sonoran Preserve Master Plan An Open Space Plan for the Phoenix Sonoran Desert City of Phoenix Parks, Recreation and Library Department February 17, 1998 Herberger Center for Design Excellence Arizona State University The City of Phoenix prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, religion, age, sexual ori- entation, or disability in its services, programs and activi- ties. Anyone who believes he or she has been discriminated against may file a complaint with the City of Phoenix Equal Opportunity Department. The City of Phoenix does not carry accident insurance to cover participants. Involvement in any activity is done at the participant’s own risk. This pubication can be provided in an alternative format upon request. Call 602-262-6862 (voice). TDD 602-262- 6713 (parks and recreation) or 602-534-5500 (city opera- tor). FAX 602-534-3787. E-mail [email protected] Figure Credits Ward Brady: cover map, chapter 2 divider, 2.14 Jim Burke: chapter 3 divider, 3.19, 5.4 City of Phoenix Information Technology: 2.13 City of Phoenix Parks, Recreation, and Library Department: cover owl, 1.1, 1.2, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 1.11, 1.12, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.12, 2.15, 2.17, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.18, 3.23, 4.1, 4.2, chapter 5 divider, 5.5, 5.7, 5.8, 5.9, 5.10, 5.11 City of Phoenix Planning Department: 2.1, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7 Joe Ewan: cover children,
    [Show full text]
  • John D Walker and The
    JOHN HENRY PEARCE by Tom Kollenborn © 1984 John Henry Pearce was truly an interesting pioneer of the Superstition Mountain and Goldfield area. His charismatic character endeared him to those who called him friend. Pearce was born in Taylor, Arizona, on January 22, 1883. His father founded and operated Pearce’s Ferry across the Colorado River near the western end of the Grand Canyon. Pearce’s father had accompanied John Wesley Powell through the Grand Canyon in 1869. John Pearce began his search for Jacob Waltz’s gold in 1929, shortly after arriving in the area. When John first arrived, he built a cabin on the Apache Trail about seven miles north- east of Apache Junction. Before moving to his Apache Trail site, John mined three gold mines and hauled his ore to the Hayden mill on the Gila River. He sold his gold to the United States government for $35.00 an ounce. During the depression his claims around the Goldfield area kept food on the table for his family. All the years John Pearce lived on the Apache Trail he also maintained a permanent camp deep in the Superstition Wilderness near Weaver’s Needle in Needle Canyon. He operated this camp from 1929 to the time of his death in 1959. John traveled the eleven miles to his camp by driving his truck to County Line Divide, then he would hike or ride horseback to his Needle Canyon Camp. Actually, Pearce had two mines in the Superstition Wilderness— one near his Needle Canyon Camp and the other located near Black Mesa Ridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Index 1 INDEX
    Index 1 INDEX A Blue Spring 76, 106, 110, 115 Bluff Spring Trail 184 Adeii Eechii Cliffs 124 Blythe 198 Agate House 140 Blythe Intaglios 199 Agathla Peak 256 Bonita Canyon Drive 221 Agua Fria Nat'l Monument 175 Booger Canyon 194 Ajo 203 Boundary Butte 299 Ajo Mountain Loop 204 Box Canyon 132 Alamo Canyon 205 Box (The) 51 Alamo Lake SP 201 Boyce-Thompson Arboretum 190 Alstrom Point 266, 302 Boynton Canyon 149, 161 Anasazi Bridge 73 Boy Scout Canyon 197 Anasazi Canyon 302 Bright Angel Canyon 25, 51 Anderson Dam 216 Bright Angel Point 15, 25 Angels Window 27 Bright Angel Trail 42, 46, 49, 61, 80, 90 Antelope Canyon 280, 297 Brins Mesa 160 Antelope House 231 Brins Mesa Trail 161 Antelope Point Marina 294, 297 Broken Arrow Trail 155 Apache Junction 184 Buck Farm Canyon 73 Apache Lake 187 Buck Farm Overlook 34, 73, 103 Apache-Sitgreaves Nat'l Forest 167 Buckskin Gulch Confluence 275 Apache Trail 187, 188 Buenos Aires Nat'l Wildlife Refuge 226 Aravaipa Canyon 192 Bulldog Cliffs 186 Aravaipa East trailhead 193 Bullfrog Marina 302 Arch Rock 366 Bull Pen 170 Arizona Canyon Hot Springs 197 Bush Head Canyon 278 Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum 216 Arizona Trail 167 C Artist's Point 250 Aspen Forest Overlook 257 Cabeza Prieta 206 Atlatl Rock 366 Cactus Forest Drive 218 Call of the Canyon 158 B Calloway Trail 171, 203 Cameron Visitor Center 114 Baboquivari Peak 226 Camp Verde 170 Baby Bell Rock 157 Canada Goose Drive 198 Baby Rocks 256 Canyon del Muerto 231 Badger Creek 72 Canyon X 290 Bajada Loop Drive 216 Cape Final 28 Bar-10-Ranch 19 Cape Royal 27 Barrio
    [Show full text]
  • II Eshelby Tensor of Concave Superspherical Inclusions
    AVERTISSEMENT Ce document est le fruit d'un long travail approuvé par le jury de soutenance et mis à disposition de l'ensemble de la communauté universitaire élargie. Il est soumis à la propriété intellectuelle de l'auteur. Ceci implique une obligation de citation et de référencement lors de l’utilisation de ce document. D'autre part, toute contrefaçon, plagiat, reproduction illicite encourt une poursuite pénale. Contact : [email protected] LIENS Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle. articles L 122. 4 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle. articles L 335.2- L 335.10 http://www.cfcopies.com/V2/leg/leg_droi.php http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/infos-pratiques/droits/protection.htm Thèse de DOCTORAT Préparée à L’Université de Lorraine - Laboratoire Georessources –UMR7359 Présentée par Fengjuan CHEN Pour obtenir le grade de Docteur en SCIENCES DE L’UNIVERSITE DE LORRAINE Spécialité Mécanique - Génie Civil Modélisation Micromécanique de Milieux Poreux Hétérogènes et Applications aux Roches Oolithiques Ph-D Thesis Micromechanical Modelling of Heterogeneous Porous Materials with Application to Oolitic Rocks Soutenance publiquement le 24 Octobre 2016 Jury composé de M.KACHANOV Professeur Tufts University, USA Rapporteur V.KUSHCH Professeur Ukraine National Academy of Science, UA Rapporteur Y.GUEGUEN Professeur Ecole Nationale Supérieure, Paris, France Examinateur I.SEVOSTIANOV Professeur New Mexico State University, USA Examinateur A.GIRAUD Professeur ENSG, Nancy, France Directeur D.GRGIC Maître de conférences ENSG, Nancy, France Co-directeur II For my father, for my mother, "It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer " Albert Einstein III IV Acknowledgement Considering the challenge, I would not accomplish my Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012
    The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012 (Photographs: Arizona Game and Fish Department) Arizona Game and Fish Department In partnership with the Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ i RECOMMENDED CITATION ........................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ iii DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................ iv BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 1 THE MARICOPA COUNTY WILDLIFE CONNECTIVITY ASSESSMENT ................................... 8 HOW TO USE THIS REPORT AND ASSOCIATED GIS DATA ................................................... 10 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... 12 MASTER LIST OF WILDLIFE LINKAGES AND HABITAT BLOCKSAND BARRIERS ................ 16 REFERENCE MAPS .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Arizona History Index, M
    Index to the Journal of Arizona History, M Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 NOTE: the index includes two citation formats. The format for Volumes 1-5 is: volume (issue): page number(s) The format for Volumes 6 -54 is: volume: page number(s) M McAdams, Cliff, book by, reviewed 26:242 McAdoo, Ellen W. 43:225 McAdoo, W. C. 18:194 McAdoo, William 36:52; 39:225; 43:225 McAhren, Ben 19:353 McAlister, M. J. 26:430 McAllester, David E., book coedited by, reviewed 20:144-46 McAllester, David P., book coedited by, reviewed 45:120 McAllister, James P. 49:4-6 McAllister, R. Burnell 43:51 McAllister, R. S. 43:47 McAllister, S. W. 8:171 n. 2 McAlpine, Tom 10:190 McAndrew, John “Boots”, photo of 36:288 McAnich, Fred, book reviewed by 49:74-75 books reviewed by 43:95-97 1 Index to the Journal of Arizona History, M Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 McArtan, Neill, develops Pastime Park 31:20-22 death of 31:36-37 photo of 31:21 McArthur, Arthur 10:20 McArthur, Charles H. 21:171-72, 178; 33:277 photos 21:177, 180 McArthur, Douglas 38:278 McArthur, Lorraine (daughter), photo of 34:428 McArthur, Lorraine (mother), photo of 34:428 McArthur, Louise, photo of 34:428 McArthur, Perry 43:349 McArthur, Warren, photo of 34:428 McArthur, Warren, Jr. 33:276 article by and about 21:171-88 photos 21:174-75, 177, 180, 187 McAuley, (Mother Superior) Mary Catherine 39:264, 265, 285 McAuley, Skeet, book by, reviewed 31:438 McAuliffe, Helen W.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Southwestern Part of the Tonto National Forest, Gila, Maricopa, Pinal and Yavapai Counties, Arizona
    Geologic map of the southwestern part of the Tonto National Forest, Gila, Maricopa, Pinal and Yavapai Counties, Arizona Authors Richard, S.M. Citation Richard, S.M. (compiler), 2015, Geologic map of the southwestern part of the Tonto National Forest, Gila, Maricopa, Pinal and Yavapai Counties, Arizona. Arizona Geological Survey Digital Geologic Map, DGM-76 & DI-41, map scale 1:130,000. Rights Arizona Geological Survey. All rights reserved. Download date 05/10/2021 19:48:06 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/630066 112°10' 112°7'30" 112°5' 112°2'30" 112°0' 111°57'30" 111°55' 111°52'30" 111°50' 111°47'30" 111°45' 111°42'30" 111°40' 111°37'30" 111°35' 111°32'30" 111°30' 111°27'30" 111°25' 111°22'30" 111°20' 111°17'30" 111°15' 111°12'30" 111°10' 111°7'30" 111°5' 111°2'30" 111°0' 110°57'30" 110°55' 110°52'30" 110°50' 110°47'30" 110°45' 34°17'30" Geologic Map of the Southwestern Part of the Tonto National Forest, Gila, 34°15' @ @ @ 34°15' @ Tsy @ Tb Xagd @ Xvrg Maricopa, Pinal and Yavapai Counties, Arizona Tsy Xcfg Qy Xvrg Xct March 2010 Tb Tsy Arizona Geological Survey Tb Qls 34°12'30" Tb 5 2.5 0 5 Miles Qi 34°12'30" Qi 5 2.5 0 5 Kilometers Tb Qi Xvrg Qy Qls Tsy Tb 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 Feet Tsy 34°10' Xu Xu 1:130,000 Scale 34°10' Xct Qi Tb Tsy Tb Xct Arizona Geological Survey Tsy Tcs 416 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan
    Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan Adopted August 16, 2004 Maricopa Trail Maricopa County Trail Commission Maricopa County Department of Transportation Maricopa County Parks and Recreation Maricopa County Planning and Development Flood Control District of Maricopa County We have an obligation to protect open spaces for future generations. Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan VISION Our vision is to connect the majestic open spaces of the Maricopa County Regional Parks with a nonmotorized trail system. The Maricopa Trail Maricopa County Regional Trail System Plan - page 1 Credits Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Andrew Kunasek, District 3, Chairman Fulton Brock, District 1 Don Stapley, District 2 Max Wilson, District 4 Mary Rose Wilcox, District 5 Maricopa County Trail Commission Supervisor Max Wilson, District 4 Chairman Supervisor Andrew Kunasek, District 3 Parks Commission Members: Citizen Members: Laurel Arndt, Chair Art Wirtz, District 2 Randy Virden, Vice-Chair Jim Burke, District 3 Felipe Zubia, District 5 Stakeholders: Carol Erwin, Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) Fred Pfeifer, Arizona Public Service (APS) James Duncan, Salt River Project (SRP) Teri Raml, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Ex-officio Members: William Scalzo, Chief Community Services Officer Pictured from left to right Laurel Arndt, Supervisor Andy Kunasek, Fred Pfeifer, Carol Erwin, Arizona’s Official State Historian, Marshall Trimble, and Art Wirtz pose with the commemorative branded trail marker Mike Ellegood, Director, Public Works at the Maricopa Trail
    [Show full text]
  • Frontiers in Geology and Ore Deposits of Arizona and the Southwest
    FRONTIERS IN GEOLOGY AND ORE DEPOSITS OF ARIZONA AND THE SOUTHWEST Arizona Geological Society and the University of Arizona 1986 Symposium FIELD TRIP GUIDEBOOK u Proterozoic Geology of the Sierra Ancha-Tonto Basin­ Mazatzal Mountains Area. Central Arizona March 17-19, 1986 Leaders: C. Conway and C. Wrucke (U.S.G.S.) Coordinators: P. Swift ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY TUCSON, ARIZONA Cover preparation by Beverly Morgan, modified from J. Mehulka and P. Mirocha, AGS Digest Volume XVI ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY P.O. BOX 40952, UNIVERSITY STATION TUCSON, ARIZONA 85719 To: Field Trip Participants Welcome to Arizona and the 1986 Arizona Geological Society Symposium "Frontiers in Geology and Ore Deposits of Arizona and the Southwest. 11 As field trip chairman I would like to wish you an enjoyable and informative con­ ference and a worthwhile field trip experience. The field trip committee set out many months ago to provide field expo­ sure to a broad spectrum of geological disciplines. The results include trips to recent precious-metal discoveries, areas of new and developing stratigraph­ ic and structure concepts, industrial mineral resources, lithologic features significant to the petroleum potential in the Southwest, geologic hazards in the community, and an opportunity to attend trips from previous Arizona Geo­ logical Society meetings. We hope you find your chosen field trip as exciting as we intended. At this time of very limited support from industry, it is especially im­ portant to acknowledge the personal efforts of so many. I include in those the planning and follow through of the field trip committee, the many hours of preparation by the trip leaders, and the commitment of the trip coordina­ tors to a smooth-running trip.
    [Show full text]