DOCSLIB.ORG

Zwirbaum's Unit Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Zwirbaum's Unit Guide Zwirbaum’s Unit Guide Hello and welcome to my unit guide. This is the first section of it - covering infantry. INFANTRY WESTERN TECH GROUP Tech 0-4: Latin Medieval Infantry. Halberd Infantry damage increase from +1 Shock is up to (if the Wiki Casaulty formula is true) 5 men per regiment in shock phase (assuming 1000 men survived to the shock phase in regiment, otherwise it is unit %*5). Also on tech 4, you get military tactics which means that bonus is just 3,75 per regiment in shock phase. And in most cases the morale is clear winner on the battlefield early on, so it's best to invest in a unit, that can help at least mitigate some morale damage (which especially with tech 4 and increased morale (=more morale damage) can be day saver. You may hovewer stick with Halberd Infantry for tech 0-3* if you really find the damage increase that important, but beacuse you may be during war when tech 4 hits, switching unit types during war can be nasty, so it may be better to stick with Latin Infantry. * - standard game starts with tech 3. Modifiers for tech 0-4: - 0.25 at tech 0, 0.35 at tech 1-4. Fire phase is neglibile at this point, units do not have any fire pips, and any +fire pips come just from the leaders. -0.2 at tech 0, 0.3 at tech 1 and 0.5 at tech 2-4. Shock phase is much more important at this point, infantry will deal more damage at this point. - 0.5 at tech 0-3, 0.75 at tech 4. Tactics of 0.5 means that 100% discipline units will deal 200% damage (so in reality damage modifier is twice as high, as it would indicate from the damage modifier for that phase). Tactics of 0.75 means that damage coming from modifier will be 1.33 times higher. - 15 at tech 0-1, 20 at tech 2-4. - 2.0 at tech 0-2, 2.5 at tech 3, 3.0 at tech 4. Tech 5-8: Galloglaich Infantry. With two offensive morale pips and one shock morale pip, they are really, really good when it comes to breaking enemy regiments, and at that point in the game you may even start to get increased morale from things like (Defensive Ideas, Higher Prestige, AT, Power Projection, good early events like Last Jousting Tournament and Morale Advisor). Modifiers for tech 5-8 - 0.35 at tech 5 ,0.55 at tech 6-7, 0.8 at tech 8. Fire phase damage for infantry increases, but it still is just behind in terms of damage to the shock phase. No units have fire pips at this point, and any +fire pip will be coming from the leaders. Remember though, that the fire phase is before shock phase, and 6 fire 0 shock general may not be as bad at tech 8 as you may thought. First cannons also appear at tech 7. -0.65 at tech 5, 0.95 at tech 6-8 . Shock phase is much more important at this point, infantry will deal more damage at this point. - 0.75 at tech 5, 1 at tech 6 and 1.25 at tech 7-8. Unit with discipline of 100% will deal 1.33 more damage than the damage modifiers would indicate at tech 5, 100% damage at tech 6, and 80% damage at tech 7-8. - 22 at tech 5 and 24 at tech 6-8. More units can now fight at the same time on the battlefield, so you may want to consider fielding bigger unit stacks, or run more units near each other to reinforce during the battle. - 3.0 at tech 5-8. No morale increase - +50% Supply increase at tech 5-8. More units can station or move through provinces without suffering attrition. Important thing, especially when you consider with the fact that combat width also increases at tech 5 and 6. Tech 9-11: Condotta Infantry. It's my personal choice in most situations, with 2 offensive shock pips, 1 defensive shock pip and 1 offensive morale and 1 defensive morale pip. Reformed Galloglaich Infantry have one more offensive morale pip at the cost of defensive shock pip, which means they are better at breaking enemy regiments, at the same time, receiving more damage during shock phase. If you have a lot of +morale modifiers, you may pick up the Galloglaich Infantry, otherwise, I would recommend Condotta, for better casaulty wise ratio. Landsknechten, are worse in terms of dealing damage (other unit types will deal increased damage against them) and their morale pips means they only hold for longer. - 0.8 at tech 9-11 , no fire damage modifier increase. -0.95 at tech 9-10, 1.15 at tech 11 . Shock damage is increased at the time of tech 11. - 1.5 at tech 9-11. Damage dealt by regiments with 100% discipline is 66,(6)% of what would indicate from modifiers. - 25 at tech 9-10 and 27 at tech 11. Slight increase in combat width. - 3.0 at tech 9-11. No morale increase. - +50% Supply increase at tech 9-11. No changes here. - +25% Flanking range increase at tech 10-11. It doesn't have actual impact during battle at this point. Tech 12-14: Free Shooter Infantry. Both units when fighting against each other have higher by one offensive morale pip than the other unit, and higher offensive shock of Free Shooter Infantry meets with increased defensive shock of the Tercio Infantry. But higher morale offensive (if you have nice +morale modifiers for your army) will allow you to shine in most cases, and 3 offensive morale means they have advantage (deal more morale damage) to most units, cavalry also. If you're struggling, and have for example low prestige, low morale due to event and/or haven't picked ideas/policies increasing religion, you may want to take Tercio, because they will suffer less casaulties during shock phase, and have better defensive morale which means, less morale damage. In most cases Free Shooter Infantry wins as better unit. - 0.8 at tech 12-13 , 1.1 at tech 14. Fire damage increases, and with units starting to get fire pips, you may see that the fire phase starts to matter. If you're rich, or fight someone who is rich, cannons may start to appear in bigger number, and they, while still relatively weak, cannot be disregarded anymore. Watch out for fire phase, and fire oriented generals can have some merit to them. - 1.15 at tech 12-14 . No shock damage increase at this point. Shock damage as you can see starts to lose it's big advantage over fire damage, but still due to the cavalry should be deciding factor. - 1.75 at tech 12-14. Damage dealt by regiments with 100% discipline is around 57,14% of what would indicate from modifiers. - 27 at tech 12-13 and 29 at tech 14. Slight increase in combat width. - 3.0 at tech 12-14. No morale increase. - +100% Supply increase at tech 12-14. That change is really important, becuase you can field more easily bigger stacks without worrying to much about attrition. With bigger combat width AND artillery making some importance, think about your stack compositions. - +25% Flanking range increase at tech 12-14. It doesn't have actual impact during battle at this point. Tech 15-18: Maurician Infantry. Maurician Infantry have better offensive fire (2v1) when compared to Charge Infantry, while Charge Infantry have better offensive shock (3v2) against Maurician. Damage for shock phase is even better for infantry at this points (1.15 vs 1.1) so why this way? Answer is simple - Fire Phase is first during the battle, and ability to deal more damage during this phase, means enemy regiments will be more depleted, and as such they will deal less damage during the shock phase, than they should, which will help close the gap of their shock damage advantage. And after shock phase, there will be another fire phase where you will have advantage. Things to consider switching up, is generals. But still I would recommend sticking with Maurician Infantry in most cases. - 1.1 at tech 15-18. No fire damage increase. - 1.15 at tech 15-18 . No shock damage increase at this point. - 2.0 at tech 15-18. Damage dealt by regiments with 100% discipline is 50% of what would indicate from modifiers. - 29 at tech 15, 30 at tech 16-17 and 32 at tech 18. Slight increase in combat width. - 4.0 at tech 15-18. Morale increases by 1.0 at the tech 15. (It means you get +33% of the base morale increase), and because all other modifiers like Military Drill, Army Tradition Prestige scales from base morale, that increase is really important - don't neglect morale. - +100% Supply increase at tech 15-16. +150% at tech 17-18. Don't forget about it, and update your stacks. - +25% Flanking range increase at tech 15-17. +50% flanking range increase at tech 18. Change matters only for Cavalry and Artillery (increase of flanking range from 2 to 3). Doesn't affect infantry. Tech 19-22: This is tough choice. At tech 19 you could pick the Highlanders Infantry, for their awesome 4 offensive morale pips (and seeing that morale increased to 4.0 and can be really important at this point) at the cost of 1 less offensive fire versus Gustavian Infantry, and having no advantage in terms of shock over Reformed Tercio (3/2 vs 2/3).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Epic of Saltpetre to Gunpowder
    Indian Journal of History of Science, 40.4 (2005) 539-57 1 EPIC OF SALTPETRE TO GUNPOWDER (Received 17 March 2005) The article provides a very tentative contour of an epic which is yet to be written in completeness, even several details of which may not have been yet discovered. Whereas the development of the nuclear weapons has taken only a few decades of the 20th century, the epic of the development of saltpetre to gunpowder, and the associated knowledge proliferation across many countries, spanned over many centuries, in fact more than a millen- nium. The Chinese origin of this epic (with a faint Indian link) is more or less established. The story of guns and other firearms is outside the scope of this article. This dissertation highlights the contributions of eminent scholars like Needham, Sarton, Gode and lqtidar Alam Khan, and also emphasizes the cross-currents of the progress and clash of civilizations, as the grand saga went on unfolding itself over the ages. History of armament research and development inevitably ushers in the philosophical issue of ends and means in the human civilization. Key Words: Chinese gunpowder tradition, Firearms, Gunpowder, Indian gunpowder tradition, Pyrotechnics, Saltpetre, Transmission, Technical terms - Arabic, Persian, Sanskrit, Turkish, Urdu. The spirit of human civilization has never endorsed 'violence', and yet has encountered violence from the Nature, the animal world and diverse and hostile human traditions as facts of life, to be resisted by scientific knowledge and technological innovations. The knowledge regarding fire and its applica- tions, some of them catastrophic, cannot be unlearnt, even for the sake of the high ideals of peace and non-violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Recasting Russia
    georgi derluguian RECASTING RUSSIA midst the clouds of apocalyptic farrago surrounding the attacks of September 11, the most significant immediate Achange in world politics has been largely obscured. The American bombardment of Afghanistan has relocated Russia within the international geopolitical order. Putin’s accession to power on the last day of 1999 was welcomed by Western capitals from the start. Blair sped to embrace him on Clinton’s behalf before he had even been installed by the manipulated popular vote of spring 2000, while relations between Moscow and its creditors in Berlin and Washington were held on an even keel throughout. But the operation that secured Putin’s domestic victory at the polls—the unleashing of a murderous second war in Chechnya—remained something of a foreign embarrass- ment. Although Clinton could freely hail the ‘liberation of Grozny’, for European sensibilities—at any rate on the continent—the mass killings and torture of Chechens was a troubling spectacle. Germany did its best to smooth over such misgivings, pentito Foreign Minister Fischer acting in the best traditions of the Wilhelmstrasse during the Armenian massacres. But public opinion—even occasionally the European Parliament—remained uneasy. Republican victory in the Presidential elections of 2000 promised fur- ther difficulties. Where Clinton and Gore had been intimately connected to Yeltsin and protective of his successor, Bush’s programme was critical of American complicity with the kleptocracy in Russia, and dismissive of the need to save Moscow’s face, pressing ahead regardless with the new version of Star Wars on which Washington had already embarked. Between European humanitarian hand-wringing and American real- politiker cold-shouldering, Russia under its former KGB operative was little more than an uncomfortable guest at the banquets of the G7.
    [Show full text]
  • In Alexandre Dumas' Novel the Man in the Iron Mask
    English Language Teaching; Vol. 6, No. 10; 2013 ISSN 1916-4742 E-ISSN 1916-4750 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Index in Alexandre Dumas’ Novel the Man in the Iron Mask: A Semiotic Analysis Salmia Syarifuddin1, Andi Rukayah Alim Yahya1, Kamaruzaman Jusoff2 & Abdul Makhsud3 1 Department of English, Faculty of Letters, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia 2 Department of Forest Production, Faculty of Forestry, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia 3 Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia Correspondence: Kamaruzaman Jusoff, Department of Forest Production, Faculty of Forestry, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. Tel: 603-89-467-176. E-mail: [email protected] Received: June 22, 2013 Accepted: July 31, 2013 Online Published: September 4, 2013 doi:10.5539/elt.v6n10p228 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n10p228 Abstract Novel as a literary work can be analyzed by using semiotic analysis. This article aims to analyze the meaning of index found in characterizations in the novel the Man in the Iron Mask by Alexandre Dumas. This article involved the descriptive qualitative method. The results revealed that there are many causal relations between the index and the characterization of the characters found in that novel. It contained 24 characterizations from eight major and five minor characters that had been representative of this article. From this article, it is obtained more information about the identified characterizations found in the novel and its index analysis that showed its causalities relation between the sign and the object (index and characterization) in a more comprehensive meaning. Since semiotics is the study of signs and novel is a literary work, it is recommended to English literature lecturers and students to enrich knowledge of analyzing literary works through semiotic analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Akbar and His Religious Policy Akbar Is Often Considered As National King
    Akbar and his religious policy Akbar is often considered as national king who united all sections of the people and he is also said to have been secular ruler who kept his personal religious ideas from framing state policies and adopted policy of religious tolerance. There are two questions which primarily arises before the historiens in regard to Akbar’s religious policy: 1. To what extent Akbar’s personal believes had influenced in his state policies? And 2. What was the response of his subjects to his state policies? There are few reasons why Akbar became secular king. 1. He was influenced by teachings of his broad-minded mother, teacher and his relatives. 2. He was influenced by the prominent cultural ethos of timurid polity-YasaE-Chingesi(treating all the religions alike) 3. The increasing presence of Irani nobles at Humayun’s had created an atmosphere for Akbar to learn religious tolerance. 4. His childhood psychology fearing about god shaped his religious outlook. For instance, abul- fazl states, as akbar says” if he had displeased God in any manner, 'may that elephant finish us for we cannot support the burden of life under God's displeasure.'” 5. His personal engagement in Islamized version of greek philosophy through Shaikh Mubaraq and his sons faizi and abul-fazl shaped his religious world outlook through Ibadatkana debates from 1575- 1578. Akbar was, in his early part of reign, following intolerant policies towards non-muslims as the following statements testify: One knows from unimpeachable evidence, including some of Akbar's own sayings recorded after 1581 that in his early years he was not only a practising Muslim but also had a very intolerant attitude htowards Hindus.
    [Show full text]
  • Greed for Power of Louise Xiv in Randall Wallace's Man in the Iron Mask Movie
    GREED FOR POWER OF LOUISE XIV IN RANDALL WALLACE’S MAN IN THE IRON MASK MOVIE: AN INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for getting Bachelor Degree in English Department TITIS HAERLIANA A 320 050 083 FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA 2009 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Study Novel is one of literary work which has contributed in making good film. Many directors try to realize novels into movie version. They want to make a film based on reader imagination and to illustrate it in visual image. There are many novels which are adapted to movie versions, such as, Cinderella, Great Expectation, Harry Potter, Pride and Prejudice, the three musketeers, Pinocchio, Gone with the Wind, Memoirs of Geisha, include Man in the Iron Mask. By using a novel as the main material source, the film maker hopes the viewer has a big curious feeling to the film which is adopted from their favorite novel. Man in the Iron Mask for example, it is presented to the movie version by Randall Wallace as the director and uses Alexandre Dumas Père’s novel with the same title. Before Man in the Iron Mask, Alexandre Dumas Père has been written “The Three Musketeers” in 19 century, and still in the same century then he wrote it. Man in the Iron Mask had been nearly twenty years since the last of Alexandre Dumas’ novels about the fames Musketeers was translated to the big screen. Randall Wallace chooses Leonardo DiCaprio, Gabriel Byrne, Anne Parillaud, Jeremy Iron, John Malkovich, and Gerard Dipardieu to play their role.
    [Show full text]
  • Mughals at War: Babur, Akbar and the Indian Military Revolution, 1500 - 1605
    Mughals at War: Babur, Akbar and the Indian Military Revolution, 1500 - 1605 A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Andrew de la Garza Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: John F. Guilmartin, Advisor; Stephen Dale; Jennifer Siegel Copyright by Andrew de la Garza 2010 Abstract This doctoral dissertation, Mughals at War: Babur, Akbar and the Indian Military Revolution, examines the transformation of warfare in South Asia during the foundation and consolidation of the Mughal Empire. It emphasizes the practical specifics of how the Imperial army waged war and prepared for war—technology, tactics, operations, training and logistics. These are topics poorly covered in the existing Mughal historiography, which primarily addresses military affairs through their background and context— cultural, political and economic. I argue that events in India during this period in many ways paralleled the early stages of the ongoing “Military Revolution” in early modern Europe. The Mughals effectively combined the martial implements and practices of Europe, Central Asia and India into a model that was well suited for the unique demands and challenges of their setting. ii Dedication This document is dedicated to John Nira. iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my advisor, Professor John F. Guilmartin and the other members of my committee, Professors Stephen Dale and Jennifer Siegel, for their invaluable advice and assistance. I am also grateful to the many other colleagues, both faculty and graduate students, who helped me in so many ways during this long, challenging process.
    [Show full text]
  • Man in the Iron Mask Study Guide
    Synopsis A swashbuckling action adventure ‘The Man in the Iron Mask’ reunites the legendary Three Musketeers to once again defend the throne of France. When the Musketeers join forces to rescue a mysterious masked prisoner in the infamous Bastille Prison, they reveal a long held secret that could end the King’s reign and destroy their enduring alliance. In a dual role, Leonardo DiCaprio stars as King Louis XIV and ‘The Man in the Iron Mask’. The Three Musketeers are played by John Malkovich (Athos), Gerard Depardieu (Porthos) and Jeremy Irons (Aramis). Gahriel Byrne plays d’Artagnan, the famous Captain of the Musketeers. Director Randall Wallace UK release date March 20, 199R Certificate 12 Running time 132 mins History Now and Then When Alexandre Dumas wrote the stories involving the Musketeers - Athos, Porthos, Aramis and d’Artagnan - there must have been something attractive about the period in which he set his stories. Dumas was looking for a time in history which might have reflected some of the concerns of his own time. He was also looking for stories which would make ‘ripping yarns’. · Is this the same for historians and historical novelists today? Are the periods and subjects that they study simply chosen because they themselves are interested in them or do they have a relevance? Perhaps an ‘echo’ of what is happening in the world today! · What about your history studies? Why do you think you are studying the periods in history that you are? TASKS Look at some of the historical novels that are popular at the moment, for example the Sharpe series.
    [Show full text]
  • Drabant 40Mm and 28Mm Listings Informationimpoted
    Drabant Miniatures 40mm and 28mm listing . DM1040"Gardes Francais" Officer with drawn High quality Miniatures from Russia. sword. £4.00 War of Spanish Succession. 40mm. 17th Century and 30 years War. 40mm DM1001 Musketeer Dutch Guard, 1701 £4.00 DM1002 Musketeer Dutch Guard, 1701 £4.00 DM1101 Moscow Artilleryman £4.00 DM1003 Drummer Dutch Guard, 1701 £4.00 DM1102 Moscow Artilleryman - £4.00 DM1004 Sergeant Dutch Guard, 1701 £4.00 DM1103 Moscow Artilleryman - £4.00 DM1005 Ensign Dutch Guard, 1701 £4.00 DM1104 Moscow Strelts of the 2nd prikaz, DM1006 Colonel Dutch Guard, 1701 £4.00 1674£4.00 DM1007 Musketeer, Dutch Guard 1701£4.00 DM1105 Gaffer of the Moscow Streltsy of the 6th DM1008 Musketeer, Dutch Guard 1701£4.00 Prikaz£4.00 DM1009 Grenadier, Dutch Guard 1701£4.00 DM1106 Infantry Officer, Poland, 1683£4.00 DM1010 Grenadier, Dutch Guard 1701£4.00 DM1107 Polish Pikeman, 1683£4.00 DM1011Grenadier, Foot Guards England DM1108 Polish Musketeer, 1683£4.00 1704£4.00 DM1109 Polish Bagpiper, 1683£4.00 DM1012Grenadier, Foot Guards England DM1110 Moscow Artilleryman, 17th century£4.00 1704£4.00 DM1111 12-pound gun, begining of the 17th DM1013Grenadier, Foot Guards, England century£9.00 1704£4.00 DM1112 Polish Musketeer, middle of 17th DM1014 6pdr Artillery Piece £9.00 century£4.00 DM1015Grenadier, Foot Guards, England DM1113 Polish Drummer, middle of 17th century 1704£4.00 £4.00 DM1016Musketeer Foot Guards England DM1114Moscow Artilleryman, middle of 17th 1704£4.00 century, with rammer .£4.00 DM1017Musketeer Foot Guards England DM1115 Polish Pikeman, 1683£4.00 1704£4.00 DM1116 Infantry Sergeant, Poland, 1683 £4.00 DM1018 The Duke of Marlborough England- DM1117 13 inch Mortar£9.00 Mounted £10.00 DM1118 Officer of Streltsy with Partizan£4.00 DM1019 Colonel Foot Guards England 1704£4.00 DM1119Moscow Streltsy, musketeer loading£4.00 DM1020 Ensign Foot Guards England 1704 DM1120M oscow Streltsy, musketeer firing£4.00 £4.00 M1121 Moscow Streltsy, standard bearer£4.00 DM1021 Sgt.
    [Show full text]
  • My Year of Training to Become a Hessian Musketeer
    MY YEAR OF TRAINING TO BECOME A HESSIAN MUSKETEER Ross H. Schwalm A key component of JSHA is to educate the public. We have done this over the years in a variety of ways. We have provided speakers to talk on a variety of subjects at major history conferences, American Revolution Round Tables, genealogy organizations, and German culture organizations. Since joining the JSHA Board of Direc- tors, I have personally spoken at a museum in Massillon, Ohio, delivered the keynote address to 2000 attendees at a Wreaths Across America event at New Bern National Cemetery, delivered history presentations with the good citizens of my home town in Tower City, Pennsylvania, and at several events in Virginia. Our annual meetings have included author talks, informal round table discus- sions, talks and displays on historical research, and some participation by military reenactment groups. In total, these methods help to inform and educate the public as well as our membership at large. Our number one method of education is the publication of history, culture and genealogy through our annual journal. It requires a significant amount of time to accurately craft a single article for the journal. I find it very educational to take on a subject and create a story. I hope I deliver new and interesting information about history from the American Figure 2: Soldiers of the Regiment von Huyn with a young spectator. Revolution to the modern era. But something was missing. I needed to figure out how else I could personally influence people to enjoy the history I love. I met Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • THE THREE MUSKETEERS Character Breakdown Athos: A
    THE THREE MUSKETEERS Character Breakdown Athos: A Musketeer in the King's Guard. Brilliant Swordsman. Seeming cold, calculating, and unromantic, he hides a generous and loyal soul under a hardened exterior. Aramis: A Musketeer in the King's Guard. Brilliant Swordsman. Torn between his love of the ladies and his desire to join the priesthood. Swordplay and romance are extensions of his artistry. Portos: A Musketeer in the King's Guard. Brilliant Soldier. Violent and sometimes barbaric he loves his clothes and his drink. D'Artagnan: Youthful. Impetuous. Great with a sword. Comes to Paris to become a Musketeer like his father before him. Quick to act, he doesn't always think things through. This is the story of how he becomes a man. Rochqueforte: The Long and somewhat inept arm of Cardinal Richelieu's law. He is vicious and deadly but buffoonish. Cardinal Richelieu: He is powerful, conniving and crafty and extremely self-serving. He wants to take over France and is getting pretty close to it. His own guard enforces his agenda often in opposition to the King's guard and desires. Louis XIII- King of France- Not a bright bulb. Spoiled, childish, and easily manipulated. Planchet: The oafish servant of the 3M. He is put upon but very loyal and surprisingly handy to have around. Queen of France- Louis's young queen. Her dalliance with Buckingham of England almost sends Europe in to war. Stately and refined and worldly. She knows the Cardinal is up to no good. Milady (Countess de Winter) A beautiful but evil seductress.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Era Six the Great Global Convergence 1400 – 1800 CE
    Big Era Six The Great Global Convergence 1400 – 1800 CE Landscape Teaching Unit 6.3 Rulers with Guns: the Rise of Powerful States 1400-1800 CE Table of Contents Why this unit? 2 Unit objectives 2 Time and materials 2 Author 2 The historical context 2 This unit in the Big Era timeline 3 Lesson 1: What is Gunpowder? 4 LessontT 2: Bells, Buddhas, and Bombards: Military Gunpowder Technology 10 Lesson 3: Bombs, Bullets, and Bureaucracies: the Growth of Centralized States 17 Lesson 4: Effects of Gunpowder in Different Societies 22 Lesson 5: Portraits of Potentates 28 This unit and the Three Essential Questions 38 This unit and the Seven Key Themes 38 This unit and the Standards in Historical Thinking 38 Resources 39 Conceptual links to other lessons 40 World History for Us All A project of the UCLA Department of History’s Public History Initiative National Center for History in the Schools https://whfua.history.ucla.edu World History for Us All Big Era 6 Landscape 6.3 Why this unit? The invention and spread of gunpowder technology is a case study in technological diffusion and one that had profound effects on human society. For some historians, the appearance of firearms marks the beginning of the modern era because it had a huge impact on the direction of human history. Students need to understand the nature of this innovation, its military and civilian applications, and the profound changes that political leaders’ use of it brought about. From a world historical perspective, it is important to widen the lens from a traditionally narrow focus on events in Europe related to this new technology to take in the consequences for peoples and societies around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Gustavus Adolphus, the Dawn of Modern Warfare, and Changes to the Great Battles of History System”
    C3i Magazine, Nr.2 (1993) “Gustavus Adolphus, the Dawn of Modern Warfare, and Changes to the Great Battles of History System” by RICHARD H. BERG Although the winds of change had been in the air for several decades previously, the battle of Breitenfeld, in 1631, was certainly the most identifiable watershed in terms of military history and a “new” method of warfare. To that extent, the Battle of Breitenfeld has often been labelled “The Dawn of Modern Warfare.” While such generic, all-inclusive labels can usually be attributed to humanity’s consuming desire to place everything that happens into a convenient pigeon-hole, this cliché contains a great deal of truth. Prior to Breitenfeld, what was to deteriorate into the Thirty Years War was mostly the Catholic/Imperialist armies of Wallenstein and Tilly pretty much having their way, as their seemingly unstoppable Spanish-style tercios lumbered and looted all over central and south Germany. Things had gotten so out of hand for the Protestant cause that Cardinal Richelieu, the legendary eminence gris of Louis XIII’s France and a staunch supporter of Catholicism, fearing a disruption in the European balance of power that would not stand to France’s good, connived to get Sweden’s young king, Gustavus II Adolphus, into the war on the side of the Protestants! Gustavus had been a keen student of both the ancient discourses on military tactics, and how/why they were used, as well as the recent developments under way in the Dutch Revolt, as brought about by Maurice of Nassau. As discussed below, he incorporated many of these neo-classic “innovations” into his army.
    [Show full text]