DOCSLIB.ORG

Rotherham Local Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rotherham Local Plan making sense of heritage Rotherham Local Plan Archaeology Scoping Study of Additional Site Allocations Ref: 79971.01 November 2013 Rotherham Local Plan, Archaeology Scoping Study of Additional Site Allocations Prepared for: Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council, Planning Policy – Planning & Regeneration, Environment & Development Services, Riverside House, Main Street, Rotherham, S60 1AE. Prepared by: Wessex Archaeology, Unit R6 Riverside Block, Sheaf Bank Business Park, Prospect Road, Sheffield, S2 3EN. www.wessexarch.co.uk November 2013 79971.01 © Wessex Archaeology Ltd 2013, all rights reserved Wessex Archaeology Ltd is a Registered Charity No. 287786 (England&Wales) and SC042630 (Scotland) Rotherham Local Plan Archaeology Scoping Study of Additional Site Allocations Quality Assurance Project Code 79971 Accession n/a Client n/a Code Ref. Planning n/a Ordnance Survey 446233, 391310 (centred) Application (OS) national grid Ref. reference (NGR) Version Status* Prepared by Checked and Approver’s Signature Date Approved By v01 E GC APN 18/11/13 File: S:\PROJECTS\79971 (Rotherham LDF 2)\Report\Working versions v02 F GC APN 28/11/13 File: S:\PROJECTS\79971 (Rotherham LDF 2)\Report v03 F AG AB 04/06/14 File: S:\PROJECTS\79971 (Rotherham LDF 2)\Report File: File: * I= Internal Draft; E= External Draft; F= Final DISCLAIMER THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT WAS DESIGNED AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF A REPORT TO AN INDIVIDUAL CLIENT AND WAS PREPARED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THAT CLIENT. THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT DOES NOT NECESSARILY STAND ON ITS OWN AND IS NOT INTENDED TO NOR SHOULD IT BE RELIED UPON BY ANY THIRD PARTY. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW WESSEX ARCHAEOLOGY WILL NOT BE LIABLE BY REASON OF BREACH OF CONTRACT NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE (WHETHER DIRECT INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL) OCCASIONED TO ANY PERSON ACTING OR OMITTING TO ACT OR REFRAINING FROM ACTING IN RELIANCE UPON THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT ARISING FROM OR CONNECTED WITH ANY ERROR OR OMISSION IN THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THE REPORT. LOSS OR DAMAGE AS REFERRED TO ABOVE SHALL BE DEEMED TO INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, ANY LOSS OF PROFITS OR ANTICIPATED PROFITS DAMAGE TO REPUTATION OR GOODWILL LOSS OF BUSINESS OR ANTICIPATED BUSINESS DAMAGES COSTS EXPENSES INCURRED OR PAYABLE TO ANY THIRD PARTY (IN ALL CASES WHETHER DIRECT INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL) OR ANY OTHER DIRECT INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL LOSS OR DAMAGE. Rotherham Local Plan, Archaeology Scoping Study of Additional Site Allocations Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................2 1.1 Project summary .................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Project background .............................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Planning policy ..................................................................................................................... 2 2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................3 2.1 Aims ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Objectives ............................................................................................................................ 3 3 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................4 3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Data sources ........................................................................................................................ 4 3.3 Data handling and analysis ..................................................................................................4 3.4 The assessment process .....................................................................................................5 3.5 Consultation with South Yorkshire Archaeology Service .....................................................5 3.6 Assumptions and limitations.................................................................................................5 4 PRESENTATION OF RESULTS .........................................................................................6 4.1 Summary .............................................................................................................................. 6 4.2 Definitions: Archaeological significance ...............................................................................6 4.3 Definitions: Recommendations ............................................................................................8 4.4 Chronology ........................................................................................................................... 9 4.5 Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................... 9 5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ..........................................................................................10 5.1 Summary ............................................................................................................................ 10 5.2 Sites with major archaeological objections to allocation ....................................................11 5.3 Sites with potential archaeological objections to allocation ................................................11 5.4 Sites with uncertain archaeological objections to allocation .............................................. 12 5.5 Sites with little or no objections to allocation ......................................................................13 6 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................14 7 TABLE OF RESULTS .......................................................................................................15 7.1 Sites from Phase 2 in numerical order ...............................................................................15 7.2 Sites from Phase 2 in order of recommendation ................................................................18 i WA Project No. 79971.01 7.3 Sites from Phase 1 and 2 in numerical order .....................................................................21 7.4 Sites from Phase 1 and 2 by recommendation ..................................................................31 8 SITE REPORTS .................................................................................................................41 9 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................... 42 10 ADDENDUM 1 ...................................................................................................................43 11 ADDENDUM 2 ...................................................................................................................45 Figures Figure 1: Key to figures 2.1-2.6 Figure 2.1 – 2.6: Rotherham Local Plan Additional Sites ii WA Project No. 79971.01 Rotherham Local Plan Archaeology Scoping Study of Additional Site Allocations Rotherham Local Plan, Archaeology Scoping Study of Additional Site Allocations Executive Summary Wessex Archaeology was commissioned by the Environment and Development Services team at Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council (Rotherham MBC) to carry out an archaeological scoping study of a further 66 sites that are being considered for inclusion in Rotherham MBC’s Local Plan. This study has been carried out to the same methodology and standard as a previous scoping study “Archaeology Scoping Study of Site Allocations” (Wessex Archaeology March 2012). Heritage assets and historic landscapes within and around each site have been identified to allow an assessment to be made of the archaeological potential of each site and the likely implications for future development. Where archaeological potential varied within a site it has been subdivided, resulting in a new total of 71 sites. The results of the assessments are tabulated in Section 7 of this document and presented as individual site reports and maps in Section 8. The assessment identified: Major 1 (1.5%) sites with major archaeological objections to archaeological allocation. These are not suitable for inclusion in the objections to Local Plan and are shown as RED on the maps. allocation Potential 16 (22.5%) sites with potential objections to allocation. archaeological These sites are suitable for inclusion in the Local Plan objections to but there is a high risk that they contain heritage allocation assets that will affect any future development proposals. These sites are shown as YELLOW on the maps. 36 (51%) sites with uncertain objections to allocation. Uncertain These sites are suitable for inclusion in the Local Plan archaeological but there is an unknown level of risk as they could objections to contain heritage assets that pose a risk to allocation development. These sites are shown as YELLOW/GREEN STRIPES on the maps. Little or no 18 (25%) sites with little or no objections to allocation. archaeological These sites are suitable for inclusion in the Local Plan objections to as there is a low risk that they contain heritage assets allocation that pose a risk to development.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Sheffield Hallam University Thesis
    An evaluation of river catchment quality in relation to restoration issues. AHMED, Badria S. Available from the Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/19204/ A Sheffield Hallam University thesis This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Please visit http://shura.shu.ac.uk/19204/ and http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html for further details about copyright and re-use permissions. Return to Learning Centre of issue Fines are charged at 50p per hour 2 6 JUL J U X V U l 1 V /-L i REFERENCE ProQuest Number: 10694084 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10694084 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 4 8 1 0 6 - 1346 An Evaluation of River Catchment Quality in Relation to Restoration Issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Policing-Policy-During-Strike-Report
    ' The Police Committee Special Sub-Committee at their meeting on 24 January 19.85 approved this report and recommended that it should be presented to the Police Committee for their approval. In doing so, they wish to place on record their appreciation and gratitude to all the members of the County Council's Department of Administration who have assisted and advised the Sub-Committee in their inquiry or who have been involved in the preparation of this report, in particular Anne Conaty (Assistant Solicitor), Len Cooksey (Committee Administrator), Elizabeth Griffiths (Secretary to the Deputy County Clerk) and David Hainsworth (Deputy County Clerk). (Councillor Dawson reserved his position on the report and the Sub-Committee agreed to consider a minority report from him). ----------------------- ~~- -1- • Frontispiece "There were many lessons to be learned from the steel strike and from the Police point of view the most valuable lesson was that to be derived from maintaining traditional Police methods of being firm but fair and resorting to minimum force by way of bodily contact and avoiding the use of weapons. My feelings on Police strategy in industrial disputes and also those of one of my predecessors, Sir Philip Knights, are encapsulated in our replies to questions asked of us when we appeared before the House of Commons Select Committee on Employment on Wednesday 27 February 1980. I said 'I would hope that despite all the problems that we have you will still allow us to have our discretion and you will not move towards the Army, CRS-type policing, or anything like that.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiveton Park and Wales History Society Internet Copy Reproduction Prohibited
    Society History Copy Wales Prohibited and Internet Park Reproduction Kiveton 2 “This is the past that’s mine.” Historical writing is a process of selection and choice as such this historical view is the information which I have selected to use; as such it does not claim to be the history of Edwardian Wales, but a history of Edwardian Wales. “This is my truth.” Society The history is written from my own broadly socialist position, and carries with it the baggage of my own social and political views both conscious and unconscious. History “Where we stand in regard to the past, what the relations are between past, present and future are not only matters of vital interest to all: they are quite indispensable. We cannot help situating ourselves in the continuum of our own life, of the family andCopy the group to which we belong. We cannot help comparing past and present: thatWales is what family photo albums or home movies are there for. We cannot help learning from it, for that is what experienceProhibited means.” Eric Hobsbawm, On History, P24 and “ The Historian is part of history. The Internetpoint in the procession at which he finds himself determines his angle of vision over the past.” Park E. H. Carr, What is History, P36 Reproduction Kiveton Paul Hanks Feb 2007 3 Society History Copy Wales © Copyright Notice Prohibited All material in this book is copyright of Paul Hanks, unless otherwise stated. This version and the designwork therein is copyright of the Kiveton Park and Wales History Society, with acknowledgement to the editorial and design contriutions of Holly Greenhalghand of Kiveton Creative and John Tanner as editor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennine Lower and Middle Coal Measures Formations of the Barnsley District
    The Pennine Lower and Middle Coal Measures formations of the Barnsley district Geology & Landscape Southern Britain Programme Internal Report IR/06/135 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGY & LANDSCAPE SOUTHERN BRITAIN PROGRAMME INTERNAL REPORT IR/06/135 The Pennine Lower and Middle Coal Measures formations of the Barnsley district The National Grid and other R D Lake Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Editor Licence No: 100017897/2005. E Hough Keywords Pennine Lower Coal Measures Formation; Pennine Middle Coal Measures Formation; Barnsley; Pennines. Bibliographical reference R D LAKE & E HOUGH (EDITOR).. 2006. The Pennine Lower and Middle Coal Measures formations of the Barnsley district. British Geological Survey Internal Report,IR/06/135. 47pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. Maps and diagrams in this book use topography based on Ordnance Survey mapping. © NERC 2006. All rights reserved Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 2006 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of Survey publications is available from the BGS British Geological Survey offices Sales Desks at Nottingham, Edinburgh and London; see contact details below or shop online at www.geologyshop.com Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG The London Information Office also maintains a reference 0115-936 3241 Fax 0115-936 3488 collection of BGS publications including maps for consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting for Dignity: the Ginger Goodwin Story/ Roger Stonebanks
    FIGHTING FOR DIGNITY The Ginger Goodwin Story Roger Stonebanks FIGHTING FOR DIGNITY: THE GINGER GOODWIN STORY FIGHTING FOR DIGNITY: THE GINGER GOODWIN STORY Roger Stonebanks St. John's: Canadian Committee on Labour History Copyright © 2004 Canadian Committee on Labour History All rights reserved Canadian Committee on Labour History Faculty of Arts Publications, FM2005 Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John's ISBN 1-894000-06-4 Manuscript was prepared for the printer by the staff of the Canadian Committee on Labour History Printed and bound in Canada Cover design by Helen Houston Mural by Frank Lewis National Library of Canada Cataloguing in Publication Stonebanks, Roger Fighting For Dignity: the Ginger Goodwin Story/ Roger Stonebanks. Includes index. ISBN 1-894000-06-4 1. Goodwin, Ginger. 2. Trade-unions-Coal miners-British Columbia-Officials and employees-Biography. 3. Labor leaders- British Columbia-Biography. I. Canadian Committee on Labour History. II. Title. HD6525.G66S74 2004 331.88'122334'092 C2003-906481-6 "If there is no struggle, there is no progress." Frederick O. Douglass (1817-1895) (U.S. social reformer who championed emancipation for blacks and rights for women) For Helen, for her love and support, and for having the idea to write about Goodwin's life as well as his death. CONTENTS Introduction 1 Chapter 1 - The Boy from Bole Hill 5 Chapter 2 - The New World 21 Chapter 3 - The Big Strike, 1912-14 36 Chapter 4 - The War Begins 55 Chapter 5 - Goodwin in Action 64 Chapter 6 - The Killing 90 Chapter 7 - From General Strike to Courtroom 108 Chapter 8 - Murder, Conspiracy, Manslaughter, Self-defence, Or, Panic-Reaction? 126 Chapter 9 - "Gentlemen of the Jury: What is Your Verdict?" 136 Epilogue 164 Acknowledgements 184 Bibliography 187 Index 199 Ginger Goodwin, 1887-1918.
    [Show full text]
  • JIM PEDEN COLLECTION; List No.7 (May 2009)
    ________________________________________________________________ INDUSTRIAL RAILWAY SOCIETY PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICE JIM PEDEN COLLECTION; List no.7 (May 2009) Available from: Kevin Lane, 15 Beech Green, Dunstable, Bedfordshire, LU6 1EB. Tel: 01582 601458 NCB, Wheldale Colliery S115, 0.6.0ST (HL3534/22), RH ¾ front view, OOU, 15/10/70 JPC-T391 ANTWERP, 0.6.0ST (HE3180/44), shunting internal user wagons, JPC-T748 23/5/72 NCB, Fryston Colliery FRYSTON No.2, 0.6.0T (HC1883/55), LH ¾ front view, reversing JPC-T395 wagons beside BR line, 15/10/70 FRYSTON No.2 again, LH ¾ front view beneath BR signals, JPC-T841 with colliery behind, 23/5/72 NCB, Ackton Hall Colliery S112, 0.6.0ST (HE2414/41), LH ¾ front view, 31/3/72 JPC-T401 AIRDALE, 0.6.0ST (HE1440/23), LH ¾ rear view, 25/8/71 JPC-T402 NCB, Glasshoughton S118, 0.6.0T (HC1870/54), LH ¾ front elevated view, 23/4/65 JPC-T493 Colliery S103, 0.6.0T (HC1864/52), RH ¾ front view, 15/8/67 JPC-T624 Glasshoughton Coke No.6, 0.6.0ST (HE2868/43), RH ¾ front view outside loco shed, JPC-T494 Ovens 18/4/70 NCB, Skiers Spring Colliery 0.4.0ST (HC1892/62), LH view, slightly to rear shunting, with JPC-T495 colliery buildings as backdrop, 31/3/72 HC No.4, 0.4.0ST (HC1892/61), RH ¾ front view, 23/2/71 JPC-T769 NCB, Savile Colliery HELEN, 0.6.0ST (AE1789/17), RH ¾ front view, 15/8/67 JPC-T510 S112 ELIZABETH, 0.6.0T (HC1600/27), RH ¾ rear view, shunting JPC-T692 amongst typical colliery clutter, 15/10/70 NCB, Frickley Colliery FRICKLEY No.4, 0.6.0ST (HE1672/30), LH broadside view, JPC-T538 16/10/55 NEWSTEAD, 0.6.0ST
    [Show full text]
  • R11 Rotherham
    South Yorkshire Historic Environment Characterisation Project Rotherham Character Zone Descriptions Industrial Settlements Areas within this Zone ‘Fence Colliery Housing’, ‘Garrowtree, Bradgate, and Kimberworth Industrial Settlement’, ‘Greaseborough Industrial Settlement’, ‘Holmes Industrial Settlement’, ‘Kilnhurst Village’, ‘Kiveton Park and Wales Colliery Housing’, ‘Lane Head, Ryecroft and Sandhill, Rawmarsh’, ‘Laughton Common Industrial Settlement’, ‘Melton Green’, ‘Park Gate, Rawmarsh’, ‘Piccadilly’, ‘Ryton Road, Anston’, ‘Silverwood’, ‘Swallow Nest, Aughton cum Aston Industrial Settlement’, ‘Swinton Bridge Industrial Settlement’, ‘Thorpe Hesley Industrial Settlement’, ‘Treeton Colliery Housing’, ‘Whinney Hill, Thrybergh’, ‘Wickersley Industrial Expansion’ Figure 1: Rawmarsh Hill. The irregular terraced bui ldings here date to the second half of the 19 th century as the earlier village (which lies to the far side of the medieval church) was expanded to the south towards Park Gate, largely in response to the growth of the Park Gate Iron and Steel Co. © SYAS Summary of Dominant Character This zone is characterised by the development of settlements constructed primarily for the housing of industrial workers, outside of the boundaries of historic medieval settlement cores. This housing often takes the form of conjoined row housing, often (when dating to the late 19 th or early 20 th 1 South Yorkshire Historic Environment Characterisation Project Rotherham Character Zone Descriptions century) similar in form to the housing in the ‘Grid Iron Terraced Housing’ zone, although older examples tend to be of more vernacular character. In contrast to the ‘grid iron’ settlement areas, housing neighbourhoods in this zone are generally fairly irregular in overall plan form. Key trends in the positioning of these industrial settlements include close proximity to railways and canals, ribbon developments along existing roads and sites that exploit land made available for construction by the parliamentary enclosure of former common land.
    [Show full text]
  • Post Industrial
    South Yorkshire Historic Environment Characterisation Project Rotherham Character Zone Descriptions Post Industrial Summary of Dominant Character Figure 1: Cortonwood Retail Park - typical late 20 th century warehouse retail development, on the site of the former Cortonwood Colliery. © Jeff Pearson used according to a creative commons licence - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ This zone is characterised by landscapes formed since the mid 1970s, during which period the county has undergone a large scale transformation in its employment base - from an economy based overwhelmingly on traditional heavy industries, such as the extraction of coal and the manufacture and processing of steel, to one in which retail, leisure and other service industries play a much greater part (Munford 2003, 149). These changes have resulted in substantial changes in historic character within this zone, particularly where formerly industrial or extractive sites have gone out of use and been cleared for redevelopment. Typical land uses associated with this zone include: commercial complexes, typically housed in prefabricated buildings (often large sheds used for warehousing and distribution), or modernist office complexes housing administrative or ‘contact’ (call centre) facilities; ornamental or recreational parklands, characterised by young plantation woodlands, grassed areas and artificial lakes (generally found on post-extractive sites); retail complexes consisting of large warehouse type sheds associated with large areas of car parking; and finally (and often on former agricultural land rather than post industrial land), large transport infrastructure features 1 South Yorkshire Historic Environment Characterisation Project Rotherham Character Zone Descriptions such as motorway junctions and associated service areas. Sites where industrial or extractive activities have ceased and structural remains have been cleared without the clear implementation of a new management regime (by the time of the characterisation study) have been included within this zone.
    [Show full text]
  • The Works Brass Band – a Historical Directory of the Industrial and Corporate Patronage and Sponsorship of Brass Bands
    The works brass band – a historical directory of the industrial and corporate patronage and sponsorship of brass bands Gavin Holman, January 2020 Preston Corporation Tramways Band, c. 1910 From the earliest days of brass bands in the British Isles, they have been supported at various times and to differing extents by businesses and their owners. In some cases this support has been purely philanthropic, but there was usually a quid pro quo involved where the sponsor received benefits – e.g. advertising, income from band engagements, entertainment for business events, a “worthwhile” pastime for their employees, corporate public relations and brand awareness - who would have heard of John Foster’s Mills outside of the Bradford area if it wasn’t for the Black Dyke Band? One major sponsor and supporter of brass bands, particularly in the second half of the 19th century, was the British Army, through the Volunteer movement, with upwards of 500 bands being associated with the Volunteers at some time – a more accurate estimate of these numbers awaits some further analysis. However, I exclude these bands from this paper, to concentrate on the commercial bodies that supported brass bands. I am also excluding social, civic, religious, educational and political organisations’ sponsorship or support. In some cases it is difficult to determine whether a band, composed of workers from a particular company or industry was supported by the business or not. The “workmen’s band” was often a separate entity, supported by a local trade union or other organisation. For the purposes of this review I will be including them unless there is specific reference to a trade union or other social organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotherham Character Zone Descriptions
    South Yorkshire Historic Environment Characterisation Project Part III: Rotherham Character Zone Descriptions Rotherham Character Zone Descriptions 399 South Yorkshire Historic Environment Characterisation Project Part III: Rotherham Character Zone Descriptions 400 South Yorkshire Historic Environment Characterisation Project Part III: Rotherham Character Zone Descriptions Assarted Enclosure Summary of Dominant Character This zone, limited to the north-western-most corner of the borough, is made up of ancient woodlands and ancient irregular enclosure patterns whose key characteristics are small, sinuous or rounded fields with mainly hedged boundaries. Very little of the land was formerly part of a medieval open field system (see ‘Strip Enclosure and ‘Agglomerated Enclosure’ zones) with the majority of records of enclosed land in this area being recorded by the project as originating from the irregular piecemeal enclosure of land. This pattern of land enclosure is characterised by field boundaries exhibiting no overall level of planned organisation. Such irregular patterns of enclosure originate when an area of land is subdivided over many years by many separate actions of enclosure. Common medieval processes that are known to have resulted in irregular piecemeal enclosure patterns include the clearance or assartment of heavily wooded landscapes, moorlands and wetlands (Taylor 1975, 94-105), and the gradual subdivision of former deer parks, for sale or lease. The zone is situated across a section of the Middle Coal Measures whose alternating bands of shales, sandstone and coal seams have weathered to produce a rolling hilly landscape with steeper scarps on western hillsides. Areas of woodland have often survived on these steeper slopes. Character areas within this zone typically occupy a parish edge location, indicating that their original clearance may have been the result of a separate process than that which established the open field systems closer to the nucleated settlements at the parish centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotherham LDF Additional Sites
    Rotherham Local Plan Development Sites Assessment Rotherham LDF Additional Sites Reference: LDF0327 Development Type: Employment Site Name Land off Cumwell Lane Source Site Allocation Suggestions Area (Ha) 9.1 UDP Allocation Green Belt Easting 449860 Proposed Allocation Other Northing 391657 Town Rotherham Employment 9.1 Address 16 October 2013 Page 1 of 4 Rotherham Local Plan Development Sites Assessment Rotherham LDF Additional Sites Reference: LDF0327 Development Type: Employment Site Assessment Subdiv Archaeological Perimeter Area Recommendation Significance (m) (Ha) ALL Local - High significance 1215 9.1 Potential archaeological objections to allocation There are no designated heritage assets within the site or study area. The SMR records one monument within the site relating to a series of possible Iron Age or Romano-British field boundaries. Within the study area the SMR records one monument relating to field systems and associated enclosures with some anomalies identified as potential kiln sites from geophysical survey. The SMR records further potential Iron Age and Romano- British remains within 500m of the site including an irregular shaped enclosure of possible Iron Age or Roman date, a prehistoric or Romano-British field system, an Iron Age or Romano-British enclosure and field system and lime kiln of probable Romano-British date all located to the east, west and south of the site. The SMR records four archaeological investigations within the study area. A geophysical survey followed by targeted trial-trenching at Sandy Lane revealed seven late medieval lime kilns dated by archaeomagnetism to the late 15th-16th century and a possible contemporary field system. Geophysical survey undertaken south of Morrisons revealed one large ditch and tentative medieval boundary ditches, while further geophysical survey undertaken at Bawtry Road indicating the presence of a number of linear archaeological features.
    [Show full text]
  • South Yorkshire Settlement Study Phase 2 Settlements 2005
    Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council, Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council, Sheffield City Council Transform South Yorkshire South Yorkshire Settlement Assessment Phase 2 Settlements Final Report Copyright Jacobs U.K. Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this report may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from Jacobs U.K. Limited. If you have received this report in error, please destroy all copies in your possession or control and notify Jacobs U.K. Limited. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the commissioning party and unless otherwise agreed in writing by Jacobs U.K. Limited, no other party may use, make use of or rely on the contents of this report. No liability is accepted by Jacobs U.K. Limited for any use of this report, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Opinions and information provided in the report are on the basis of Jacobs U.K. Limited using due skill, care and diligence in the preparation of the same and no warranty is provided as to their accuracy. It should be noted and it is expressly stated that no independent verification of any of the documents or information supplied to Jacobs U.K. Limited has been made. May 2005 Jacobs Babtie: 1 City Walk, Leeds, LS11 9DX Tel: 0113 242 6771 Fax: 0113 389 1389 Issue Record Sheet Report Number Issue Date Authors Checker Authorised for Comment No issue by Project Director 1 05 Sept, Martin White, Interim draft issued to 2004 Alan Mitchell of RMBC 2 04 Martin White, 1st Draft Issued to Alan October, Nathan Smith, Mitchell (RMBC), Bob 2004 Nicole Roche Wallens (DMBC) and Peter Rainford (SCC) 3 October 1st Draft Issued to DTZ, 2004 Costas Georgiou of the South Yorkshire Partnership and Wendy Strutt of RMBC 4 16 Nov 2nd Draft Report Issued 2004 to Bob Wallens (DMBC), Alan Mitchell (RMBC), Peter Rainford (SCC), Peter o Brien (Transform).
    [Show full text]