(Public Pack)Agenda Document For

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Public Pack)Agenda Document For Democratic Services Section Chief Executive’s Department Belfast City Council City Hall Belfast BT1 5GS 12th February. 2016 MEETING OF STRATEGIC POLICY AND RESOURCES COMMITTEE Dear Alderman/Councillor, The above-named Committee will meet in the Lavery Room - City Hall on Friday, 19th February, 2016 at 9.30 am, for the transaction of the business noted below. You are requested to attend. Yours faithfully, SUZANNE WYLIE Chief Executive AGENDA: 1. Routine Matters (a) Apologies (b) Minutes (c) Declarations of Interest (d) Change of Date of Meeting in March (Pages 1 - 2) 2. Restricted Items (a) North Foreshore Update (Pages 3 - 10) (b) City Centre Investment Fund (Pages 11 - 16) (c) Update on Belfast Waterfront and Ulster Hall Limited (Pages 17 - 30) 3. Matters referred back from Council/Notices of Motion (a) Notice of Motion re School Buses – Response from the Minister (Pages 31 - 34) - 2 - 4. Physical Programme and Asset Management (a) Capital Programme Update (Pages 35 - 36) (b) Area Working Update (Pages 37 - 44) (c) Asset Management (Pages 45 - 52) 5. Finance, Procurement and Performance (a) Financial Reporting – Quarter 3 2015-16 (Pages 53 - 78) (b) Contracts for Award (Pages 79 - 82) (c) Allocation of Special Responsibility Allowance (Pages 83 - 86) 6. Strategic Policy Development (a) Local Development Plan - Statement of Community Involvement (To Follow) 7. Equality and Good Relations (a) Good Relations Partnership Meeting (Pages 87 - 100) (b) Diversity Working Group Meeting (Pages 101 - 108) (c) Additional information for consideration of the Poppy Sculptures (To Follow) 8. Operational Issues (a) Minutes of Budget and Transformation Panel Meeting (Pages 109 - 112) (b) Requests for the use of the City Hall and the provision of Hospitality (Pages 113 - 118) (c) Consultation on Department of Culture Arts and Leisure’s Sub Regional Stadia Programme for Soccer (Pages 119 - 164) (d) Environmental Governance in NI - Consultation Response (Pages 165 - 174) (e) DHSSPS Health and Social Care-Reform and Transformation - Getting The Structures Right Consultation Response (Pages 175 - 184) 9. Attendance at Events (a) Sustainable Food Cities conference and award event (Pages 185 - 188) - 3 - STRATEGIC POLICY & RESOURCES COMMITTEE Subject: Change of Date of Meeting in March Date: 19th February, 2016 Reporting Officer: Stephen McCrory, Democratic Services Manager Contact Officer: Jim Hanna, Senior Democratic Services Officer Is this report restricted? Yes No x Is the decision eligible for Call-in? Yes x No 1.0 Purpose of Report or Summary of main Issues 1.1 To seek the Committee’s approval to change the date of the monthly meeting In March 2016. 2.0 Recommendations 2.1 The Committee is recommended to agree that the monthly meeting in March be rescheduled and held on Tuesday, 22nd March at 9.30a.m. 3.0 Main report Key Issues 3.1 The Members will recall that the Committee, at its meeting on 18th December 2015, agreed the schedule of meetings for 2016, with the March meeting due to be held on Friday, 18th March. 3.2 In addition, the Committee has also agreed that the Council should lead a city partnership delegation to MIPIM which would take place in France from 14th – 17th March, 2016. A budget of £60,000 had been approved. 3.3 As a delegation of Members and Council officers will be in attendance and will not be returning until 18th March, it is felt that it would be appropriate for the Strategic Policy and Resources Committee meeting scheduled for that day to be rearranged and held on Tuesday, 22nd March. Financial & Resource Implications 3.4 None. Equality or Good Relations Implications 3.5 None. 4.0 Appendices – Documents Attached 4.1 None STRATEGIC POLICY & RESOURCES COMMITTEE Subject: Notice of Motion re: School Buses – Response from the Minister Date: 19th February, 2016 Reporting Officer: Stephen McCrory, Democratic Services Manager Contact Officer: Jim Hanna, Senior Democratic Services Officer Is this report restricted? Yes No x Is the decision eligible for Call-in? Yes x No 1.0 Purpose of Report or Summary of main Issues 1.1 To consider the response from the Minister of the Environment in relation to the Council’s Notice of Motion on School Buses. 2.0 Recommendations 2.1 The committee is requested to note the response from the Minister. 3.0 Main report 3.1 Key Issues The Council, at its meeting on 5th January, 2016, passed the following Notice of Motion on School Buses which had been proposed by Councillor Boyle and seconded by Alderman Convery: 3.2 “This Council agrees to write to the Minister for Education and to the Minister for the Environment requesting that they introduce legislation to prevent vehicles from over-taking school buses while the vehicle is stationary and children are getting on to or departing from it.” 3.3 A response from the Minister has been received (Appendix 1) which outlines the measures/regulations the Department of the Environment has introduced to improve safety on school buses, the publicity/education campaign to raise awareness and the teaching resources for use in schools in relation to road safety. Financial & Resource Implications 3.4 None. Equality or Good Relations Implications 3.5 None. 4.0 Appendices – Documents Attached 4.1 Appendix 1 - Copy of response from the Minister of the Environment. STRATEGIC POLICY & RESOURCES COMMITTEE Subject: Capital Programme Update Date: 19 February 2016 Reporting Officer: Gerry Millar, Director of Finance and Resources Ronan Cregan, Deputy Chief Executive Contact Officer: Sinead Grimes, Programme Manager Is this report restricted? Yes No Is the decision eligible for Call-in? Yes No 1.0 Purpose of Report or Summary of main Issues 1.1 The Council’s Capital Programme is a rolling programme of investment which either improves existing Council facilities or provides new facilities. This report outlines projects recommended to be moved / added on the capital programme The 2016/17 Capital Programme will be presented to the meeting of the Strategic Policy and Resources Committee in March 2016. 2.0 Recommendations 2.1 Members are asked to agree that: Alleygates – Phase 4 is moved to Stage 3- Committed. Officers work up a list of the proposed gates for Phase 4 for consideration by the Area Working Groups After consideration by the Area Working Groups the proposed list is presented to the Strategic Policy and Resources Committee. Given the above process, the project is held at ‘Stage 3- Tier 0 – Schemes at Risk’ pending confirmation by the Committee of the list of gates for Phase 4. 3.0 Main report Key Issues 3.1 Alleygates Phase 4 – Members will be aware that the Council has delivered to date three phases of the alley gating programme across the city which has seen the installation of over 600 gates. Members are aware that a fourth phase of alley gates has been proposed. 3.2 It is recommended that Alleygates Phase 4 is now moved to Stage 3 – Committed. The Director of Finance and Resources has confirmed that this project is within the affordability limits of the Council and agreed that a maximum of £700,000 be allocated. 3.3 The setting of a maximum budget for this project will allow the final number of gates to be determined and it is recommended that officers now work up a list of the proposed gates. This will be brought back into the Area Working Groups for consideration. The scheme will be held at ‘Stage 3- Tier 0 – Schemes at Risk’ until the location of the gates is agreed by Committee. 3.4 It is further recommended that once the location of the gates has been agreed by Committee the necessary procurement processes (including the invitation of tenders and/or the use of appropriate ‘framework’ arrangements) be initiated with contracts to be awarded on the basis of most economically advantageous tenders received and full commitment to deliver. Financial and Resources Implications 3.5 Director of Finance and Resources has confirmed that the movement of the project is within the affordability limits of the Council and agreed that a maximum of £700,000 be allocated. Equality or Good Relations Implications 3.6 There are no specific equality or good relations implications 4.0 Appendices – Documents Attached 4.1 None STRATEGIC POLICY & RESOURCES COMMITTEE Subject: Area Working Update Date: 19 February 2016 Reporting Officer: Gerry Millar, Director of Property & Projects Contact Officer: Sinead Grimes; Programme Manager Is this report restricted? Yes No Is the decision eligible for Call-in? Yes No 1.0 Purpose of Report or Summary of main Issues 1.1 To provide an update on a number of area related issues for Members consideration. 2.0 Recommendations 2.1 Members are asked to note The Local Investment Fund proposals as detailed in the report (3.1 and 3.2) The Request for Council to act as Delivery Agent for other projects in relation to the Social Investment Fund , Building Successful Communities and Urban Villages (3.3 – 3.8). In relation to Resourcing at a local level the Council is now progressing - 25 projects under LIF1 - 37 LIF2 projects which have been agreed in principle - Investigating a further 15 projects for their feasibility for funding under LIF2 - Up to 15 projects worth approx £800,000 within the 4 BSC areas - 10 projects under SIF in the Belfast North and Belfast East areas with further letters of offer likely over the coming months - 2 capital projects in the Colin area together with a range of feasibility studies This is in addition to works that are being progressed on 50 projects under the Capital Programme and 22 projects under BIF. 2.2 Members will appreciate that there is a substantial amount of work in bringing forward.
Recommended publications
  • LE19 - a Turning of the Tide? Report of Local Elections in Northern Ireland, 2019
    #LE19 - a turning of the tide? Report of local elections in Northern Ireland, 2019 Whitten, L. (2019). #LE19 - a turning of the tide? Report of local elections in Northern Ireland, 2019. Irish Political Studies, 35(1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2019.1651294 Published in: Irish Political Studies Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2019 Political Studies Association of Ireland.. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:29. Sep. 2021 #LE19 – a turning of the tide? Report of Local Elections in Northern Ireland, 2019 Lisa Claire Whitten1 Queen’s University Belfast Abstract Otherwise routine local elections in Northern Ireland on 2 May 2019 were bestowed unusual significance by exceptional circumstance.
    [Show full text]
  • “A Peace of Sorts”: a Cultural History of the Belfast Agreement, 1998 to 2007 Eamonn Mcnamara
    “A Peace of Sorts”: A Cultural History of the Belfast Agreement, 1998 to 2007 Eamonn McNamara A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy, Australian National University, March 2017 Declaration ii Acknowledgements I would first like to thank Professor Nicholas Brown who agreed to supervise me back in October 2014. Your generosity, insight, patience and hard work have made this thesis what it is. I would also like to thank Dr Ben Mercer, your helpful and perceptive insights not only contributed enormously to my thesis, but helped fund my research by hiring and mentoring me as a tutor. Thank you to Emeritus Professor Elizabeth Malcolm whose knowledge and experience thoroughly enhanced this thesis. I could not have asked for a better panel. I would also like to thank the academic and administrative staff of the ANU’s School of History for their encouragement and support, in Monday afternoon tea, seminars throughout my candidature and especially useful feedback during my Thesis Proposal and Pre-Submission Presentations. I would like to thank the McClay Library at Queen’s University Belfast for allowing me access to their collections and the generous staff of the Linen Hall Library, Belfast City Library and Belfast’s Newspaper Library for all their help. Also thanks to my local libraries, the NLA and the ANU’s Chifley and Menzies libraries. A big thank you to Niamh Baker of the BBC Archives in Belfast for allowing me access to the collection. I would also like to acknowledge Bertie Ahern, Seán Neeson and John Lindsay for their insightful interviews and conversations that added a personal dimension to this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL REPORT (Hansard)
    Committee for Social Development OFFICIAL REPORT (Hansard) Licensing Bill: Ulster Rugby, Irish Football Association and Ulster GAA 14 January 2016 NORTHERN IRELAND ASSEMBLY Committee for Social Development Licensing Bill: Ulster Rugby, Irish Football Association and Ulster GAA 14 January 2016 Members present for all or part of the proceedings: Mr Alex Maskey (Chairperson) Mr Fra McCann (Deputy Chairperson) Mr Jim Allister Mr Roy Beggs Ms Paula Bradley Mr Stewart Dickson Mr Sammy Douglas Mr Phil Flanagan Mrs Dolores Kelly Mr Adrian McQuillan Witnesses: Mr Trevor Annon Irish Football Association Mr William Campbell Irish Football Association Mr Stephen McGeehan Ulster GAA Dr Danny Murphy Ulster GAA Mr David Boyd Ulster Rugby Mr Shane Logan Ulster Rugby The Chairperson (Mr Maskey): From the three main sporting organisations that have stadia, I formally welcome Shane Logan, David Boyd, William Campbell, Trevor Annon, Danny Murphy and Stephen McGeehan. I thank you all. You are aware that Judith Cochrane is sponsoring a private Member's Bill to ease some of the difficulties that stadia face with their licensing practices. Without any further ado, I have advised members where the papers are in their packs — Mr Beggs: I declare an interest as a non-playing member of Larne Rugby Football Club. The Chairperson (Mr Maskey): I was going to say that you had not starred on the pitch so far. Mr Allister: It is still an aspiration. [Laughter.] Mr Flanagan: I declare an interest as a trying-to-play member of Cumann Lúthchleas Gael. The Chairperson (Mr Maskey): OK. You will be all right when you grow up.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulster Unionist Dimension in the Usa 2004
    ULSTER UNIONIST DIMENSION IN THE USA Prioritising Neutrality or Leverage, Third Party mediation with a reluctant actor: The U.S. government and Ulster Unionists as a case study By Elodie Aviotte PhD 2004 ULSTER UNIONIST DIMENSION IN THE USA Prioritising Neutrality or Leverage, Third Party mediation with a reluctant actor: The U.S. government and Ulster Unionists as a case study By Elodie Aviotte, DEUG, Licence, Maîtrise For the Degree of PhD Dublin City University School of Law and Government Supervisor: Dr. John Doyle October 2004 I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of a Ph.D. is entirely my own work and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In memory of Alain Janey, my grand-father, without whom, all of this would never have been possible. To my family and friends who constantly supported me. This thesis is theirs as without them, the road to achievement would have been considerably more difficult. I would like to thank Dr. John Doyle, my Ph.D. supervisor, for his guidance and hard work during all those years. I would also like to express my deepest gratitude to Prof. David E. Schmitt for showing me the way when I did not know which direction to take. 1 am very grateful to all the people who helped me, all the interviewees and those who contributed to make this thesis feasible by providing crucial material or the right context at the right time.
    [Show full text]
  • MARCHING THROUGH 1996 This Report Was Written Between January
    PREFACE - MARCHING THROUGH 1996 This report was written between January and March 1996 as the new marching season drew near. Interviews and conversations that we had with parade organisers, bandsmen, residents groups, the police and those involved in promoting mediation or cross community dialogue, indicated that no progress had been made since the autumn of 1995. There appeared to have been little contact between any of the opposing parties since the previous summer, and in most cases there seemed to be little in the way of either hope or expectation that dialogue would move the debate forward. There was no public talk of compromise, if anything positions had hardened. Individuals and groups seemed to be digging in for another summer of `angry voices and marching feet'. The 1996 marching season began badly with a fourteen hour stand-off at the Ormeau Bridge on Easter Monday, after the Apprentice Boys had been banned from parading along the lower Ormeau Road. The attacks on the police, by a small section of the crowd protesting the ban, were at least as violent as at any similar confrontation last year. The responses were largely predictable. The media expressed outrage. The parade organisers washed their hands of any responsibility for what happened. Politicians wrung their hands. Some blamed the `hangers-on', others appealed for calm, for dialogue, for compromise. The suggestion of an independent tribunal to oversee the disputes was briefly mentioned. The story remained prominent for a few days and then quietly disapeared. But the problem of contested parades will not go away simply by ignoring it.
    [Show full text]
  • ALDERMAN JIM RODGERS (March 2016)
    ALDERMAN JIM RODGERS (March 2016) Ulster Unionist Party Elected as Councillor to represent the Victoria Electoral Area in May 1993. Re-elected as Councillor to represent the Victoria Electoral Area in May 1997, June 2001, May 2005 and May 2011. Elected to Northern Ireland Forum for Belfast East in May 1996. Elected Deputy Lord Mayor in June 1997. Elected Lord Mayor in June 2001 Awarded OBE in Queen’s Honours List January 2003 Elected Lord Mayor in June 2007. Designated Alderman at Annual Meeting of Council in May 2011. Elected as Councillor to represent Ormiston Electoral Area in May 2014. Designed Alderman at Annual Meeting of Council in March 2015. Council 1993-97 Committees/Sub-Committees Client Services Committee (1993-95 & 1996-97) Client (Leisure) Sub-Committee Client (Parks & Amenities) Sub-Committee (Chairman June 1995 - May 1997) Policy & Resources Committee Policy & Resources (Policy & Performance Review) Sub-Committee Client (Community) Sub-Committee Road Safety Committee (1993-95) Policy & Resources (Finance & Administration) Sub-Committee (April 1995 - August 1995) Housing Liaison Committee (April 1995) Client (Leisure) Sub-Committee (June 1995 - May 1997) Outside Bodies Eastern Health & Social Services Council (to June 1995) Central Services Agency Belfast Education & Library Board (from November 1995) East Belfast Partnership Board Community & Police Liaison Committee Steering Group Community & Police Liaison Committee Musgrave Street Police Authority for Northern Ireland Council 1997-2001 Committees/Sub-Committees Development
    [Show full text]
  • Working Papers in International Studies Centre for International Studies Dublin City University
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by DCU Online Research Access Service Working Papers in International Studies Centre for International Studies Dublin City University ‘Ulster Like Israel can only lose once’: Ulster unionism, security and citizenship from the fall of Stormont to the eve of the 1998 Agreement. John Doyle School of Law and Government Dublin City University Working paper 8 of 2003 Centre for International Studies School of Law and Government Dublin City University Ireland Tel. +353 1 7008084 Fax + 353 1 7008036 Email [email protected] Web: www.dcu.ie/~cis ‘Rebels have no rights’1 Introduction The idea that unionist political elites perceive themselves as representing a community which is ‘under siege’ and that their ideology reflects this position is regularly repeated in the literature.2 Unionists are not uncomfortable with this description. Dorothy Dunlop, for example, is certainly not the only unionist politician to have defended herself against accusations of having a siege mentality by countering that ‘we are indeed under siege in Ulster.’3 A Belfast Telegraph editorial in 1989 talks of a unionist community ‘which feels under siege, both politically and from terrorism.’4 Cedric Wilson UKUP member of the Northern Ireland Forum said ‘with regard to Mr. Mallon’s comments about Unionist’s being in trenches, I can think of no better place to be ... when people are coming at you with guns and bombs, the best place to be is in a trench. I make no apology for being in a trench’5. Yet despite this widespread use of the metaphor there have been few analyses of the specifics of unionism’s position on security, perhaps because the answers appear self-evident and the impact of unionists’ views on security on the prospects for a political settlement are not appreciated.6 This paper examines how the position of unionist political elites on security affects and reflects their broader views on citizenship.
    [Show full text]
  • Nitoring Rogramme 2006-08
    EVOLUTION ONITORING ROGRAMME 2006-08 Northern Ireland Devolution Monitoring Report January 2008 Professor Rick Wilford & Robin Wilson Queen’s University Belfast (eds.) ISSN 1751-3871 The Devolution Monitoring Programme From 1999 to 2005 the Constitution Unit at University College London managed a major research project monitoring devolution across the UK through a network of research teams. 103 reports were produced during this project, which was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (grant number L 219 252 016) and the Leverhulme Nations and Regions Programme. Now, with further funding from the Economic and social research council and support from several government departments, the monitoring programme is continuing for a further three years from 2006 until the end of 2008. Three times per year, the research network produces detailed reports covering developments in devolution in five areas: Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Englsh Regions, and Devolution and the Centre. The overall monitoring project is managed by Professor Robert Hazell and Akash Paun at the Constitution Unit, UCL and the team leaders are as follows: Scotland: Charlie Jeffery Institute of Governance, University of Edinburgh Wales: Dr Richard Wyn Jones & Dr Roger Scully Institute of Welsh Politics, University of Wales, Aberystwyth Northern Ireland: Professor Rick Wilford & Robin Wilson Queen’s University, Belfast English Regions: Martin Burch, Alan Harding & James Rees IPEG, University of Manchester The Centre: Akash Paun, The Constitution Unit, UCL The Constitution Unit and the rest of the research network is grateful to all the funders of the devolution monitoring programme. All devolution monitoring reports are published at: www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution- unit/research/devolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Immobility, Ethno-Politics and Sectarian Violence: Obstacles to Post-Conflict Reconstruction in Northern Ireland
    SOCIAL IMMOBILITY, ETHNO-POLITICS AND SECTARIAN VIOLENCE: OBSTACLES TO POST-CONFLICT RECONSTRUCTION IN NORTHERN IRELAND A dissertation presented by Curtis Holland to The Department of Sociology and Anthropology In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the field of Sociology Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts October 2016 1 SOCIAL IMMOBILITY, ETHNO-POLITICS AND SECTARIAN VIOLENCE: OBSTACLES TO POST-CONFLICT RECONSTRUCTION IN NORTHERN IRELAND A dissertation presented by Curtis Holland ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology in the College of Social Sciences and Humanities of Northeastern University October 2016 2 Through analysis of semi-structured and open-ended interviews with community leaders in Belfast, content analysis of newspaper reports, and interpretation of police data on sectarian violence, this dissertation identifies shifts in power dynamics within and between the polarized Protestant and Catholic communities which (re)shape obstacles to post-conflict reconstruction in Northern Ireland. Findings suggest that political provocations which promote ethno-political tensions are facilitated by the economic marginalization of communities historically susceptible to violence; failure of the same elected leaders to deal with the past; ongoing community influence of paramilitary factions; and disjuncture between the political priorities of upper- and lower-classes within each ethno-political community. The research further illustrates how ex- paramilitary prisoners’ political disaffection shapes their social agencies of "resistance," which is underscored by desires for autonomy and recognition, and channeled by ethno- gendered scripts rooted in both violent cultures of paramilitarism and non-violent peacebuilding masculinities. The implications on women of male ex- combatants' takeover of leadership roles in the community sector are also discussed.
    [Show full text]