DOCSLIB.ORG

962=E9 6>6C86?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
962=E9 6>6C86? ,'* RNI Regn. No. MPENG/2004/13703, Regd. No. L-2/BPLON/41/2006-2008 *!"+, -.+ +- / 0- "11 2+2 + 13 7<"2(6""2" ):<"9>8=868:2?)6 228)966 869:9?@$27 ;:2<9;:?;<6)7<" "<@:"<?" @:<8<": 2(2=6">6( 2$O)6<@:6("?96) )?)( 86:"<8? :>86"<;<8=B<>7<8< @ .2%+, 3 /11 A< ) 6 &< #- . # &&/+'0 +&1+%$/ !"# "$ % &%'# ()* "# !" R #$!!% )) 67869: pollution and also explained and further by November 4.” children about the ill effects of According to US Embassy he Supreme Court-man- stubble burning on air quality. at New Delhi database, on an & Tdated Environment “I would also like all the average, concentration of pol- Pollution Control Authority students to write letters to lutants in Vasundhara, Anand (EPCA) on Friday declared a Khattar Uncle and Captain Vihar, Sectors 62, 125 of Noida R “public health emergency” in Uncle to provide machinery and Okhla recorded severe Delhi-NCR after air pollution and equipment to farmers to plus AQI category. R breached records of the season. stop them from burning stub- According to Central The EPCA imposed a ban on ble in Punjab and Haryana,” the Pollution Control Board, AQI ! all construction activities till Delhi CM told students. in Palwal was 369, Panipat November 5. With the blanket of haze 421, Rohtak 467, Sirsa 462. "# The Air Quality Index over Delhi thickened on Friday, The health bulletin rec- (AQI) shot up to 484 in Delhi EPCA chief Bhure Lal wrote a ommended people to avoid and 496, 496 and 469 in letter to the Chief Secretaries of physical activities outdoors. 67869: Ghaziabad, Greater Noida and Punjab and Haryana. “The “Stop any activity level if you Gurugram respectively. With EPCA has directed implement- experience any unusual cough- ontrary to Chief Minister rising values of pollutants, ing agencies to take immediate ing, chest discomfort, wheez- CArvind Kejriwal’s asser- Delhi map turned into dark stringent actions to stop stubble- ing, breathing difficulty, or tions that stubble burning in maroon signifying “severe burning in Punjab and Haryana. fatigue, and consult doctor. Delhi’s neighbouring States plus category”. This requires vigilance and “If the room has windows, contributes to the Capital’s The EPCA also ordered punitive action against all cases close them. If the air condi- deadly pollution, the Centre shutting of all coal-based of local pollution, from plastic tioner provides a fresh air has told the Supreme Court in plants, diesel generator sets, and garbage burning to dust intake option, close it. Avoid an affidavit that crop stubble bursting of crackers in Delhi- pollution,” Lal said. burning anything, such as # $ % & ' ( ) & burning has declined nearly 41 NCR till November 5. SAFAR said chances of wood, candles or even incense. per cent between 2016 and Government had admitted Meanwhile, the contribu- deterioration in AQI of Delhi Keep the room clean — do not 2018 in Punjab, Haryana and that stubble burning is a chief tion of stubble burning in in first week of November is vacuum. Do wet mopping fre- Uttar Pradesh. cause of bad air in Delhi- Punjab and Haryana to Delhi’s mainly due to the late with- quently. Masks known as N-95 According to the affidavit NCR in the months of October pollution rose to 46 per cent on drawal of monsoon forcing or P-100 respirators may help if filed by the Union and November. The Friday, the highest this year, said stagnant conditions. “The you go out. Do not rely on dust Environment Ministry in the Government added that it is System of Air Quality and effective stubble fire counts of masks for protection,” it said. Supreme Court, Punjab taking all possible measures, Weather Forecasting and north west India (Haryana and remained at the bottom of including additional budgetary Research (SAFAR). PM 2.5 Punjab) touched a new peak $&''( Delhi’s adjoining States in allocation to the States of reached 383 ug/m3, highest in value of this year (3178) on reducing its share of the toxic Punjab, Haryana and Uttar season which is equivalent to Thursday,” it said. )'*++$ 67869: Ornithologists in Delhi perature there,” said Dr Faiyaz haze. Pradesh, to reduce the menace. 500 plus on the AQI (severe However, Delhittes can said low presence of birds in Khudsar. Inadequate vegetation For his part, Union The Ministry cited a plus), SAFAR said. draw solace from the fact that New Delhi: As air pollution here has been a significant wetland and sanctuaries can be in wetland is also a factor in Environment Minister Prakash Government-mandated study In the wake of the rising the westerly wind direction is reached alarming levels, hospi- Tdrop in the number of attributed to climate change but lowering the number of winged Javadekar on Friday at an conducted using satellite level of pollution, the Delhi likely to bring some breather. tals reported a surge in the migratory birds that normally their route also plays pivotal guests, the bird watchers event slammed Kejriwal for remote sensing to lay down Government on Friday decid- “The western disturbance number of patients. “Patients visit in the Yamuna Biodiversity role in marking their presence said. “politicising” the issue of air statistics regarding reduction ed to shut all schools till is likely to positively influence are coming with complaints of Park (YBP) in the national in Delhi-NCR. “Birds come here to enjoy pollution and indulging in a in the crop stubble burning. November 5. Also, earlier in the Delhi’s air quality by increasing watery eyes, cough, breathing Capital during this time. This “Yes… bird sighting is low climate. They gain weight and blamegame as the air quality in It said there has been a reduc- day Delhi Chief Minister surface and boundary layer difficulty, exacerbation of asth- year, only 22 birds arrived in this year in October. There are younger birds come first, there Delhi-NCR deteriorated fur- tion of about 15 per cent and Arvind Kejriwal distributed winds speed and thereby flush- ma and chronic obstructive the YBP, which is quite low as several factors affecting. First is are several indicators in and ther. 41 per cent in the number of masks to school children as ing out the accumulated pol- pulmonary diseases (COPD),” compared to the last five years, the local climate of Europe, around wetland area, phrag- In its affidavit filed on the burning events in 2018 as part of the Government’s ini- lutants. By November 3, sig- said AIIMS Director Randeep especially during September - Siberia and Central Asia. This mites, a type of grass, is one,” direction of the top court on compared to 2017 and 2016, tiative to protect them from nificant improvement is likely Guleria. SR October period. year, there is a change in tem- Dr Khudsar explained. October 22, the Central respectively. P 67869: alliance spearheaded by dent — in October. least four political parties, wise poll preparations. He Jharkhand Mukti Morcha The JMM-headed JMM, Congress, JVM (P) and claimed that the BP would lift he Election Commission (JMM) that hopes to give a Opposition is pinning its hopes the RJD,” said JMM general the crown again with the party !" T(EC) on Friday announced tough fight to Das who is on the anti-incumbency factors secretary Supriyo Bhattacharya, going past the record 65 seats a five-phase Assembly election claiming to repeat BJP’s win in working at the local level along adding, “We are working to in the State. Jharkhand schedule in Jharkhand between the polls with a “record 65 with price-rise and unemploy- finalise the seat-sharing for- Assembly elections will be the November 30 and December seats”. ment giving it a leg-up in the mula.”Bhattacharya claimed third full State polls since Prime # 20, with the counting to be held Das is the first non-tribal poll. The BJP-led National JMM’s working president and Minister Narendra Modi led the !" O on December 23. to become Jharkhand’s Chief Democratic Alliance (NDA) in the Leader of the Opposition, BJP to a massive win in Lok " Chief Election Minister. Tribals, though, make 2014 collected 43 seats and Hemant Soren, will be the Sabha elections in April-May. Commissioner (CEC) Sunil the single-biggest chunk of jacked it up further by pulling chief ministerial face of the The CEC said, “Voting for 67869: loss. On Thursday, $ Arora said the polls will be held voters in the State with around in 6 JVP (P) MLAs in 2015 to grand alliance.” The BJP, which 13 constituencies will be held Chidambaram’s lawyer Kapil L in the Naxalism-affected State 26 per cent total population, as sit pretty with a dominant currently rules the State in an in the first phase on November he Delhi High Court on Sibal argued that Crohn’s dis- &M on November 30, December 7, per the 2011 census. majority. State Congress pres- alliance with the All Jharkhand 30, followed by the second TFriday dismissed former ease may lead to cancer, nar- & 12, 16 and 20. As many as 19 As in the case of ident Rameshwar Oraon Students’ Union (AJSU), hopes phase in 20 constituencies on Finance Minister P rating the “pathetic” medical & districts are sensitive and 13 Maharashtra and Haryana, claimed defections will not for better results than it record- December 7. Seventeen seats Chidambaram’s request for condition of Chidambaram. worst-affected by Left-wing where prior to elections sever- have any impact and the BJP ed in Maharashtra and will vote on December 12 in interim bail in the INX Media The HC will hear his reg- extremism in the State. The al Opposition MPs and MLAs will be crushed in Jharkhand.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE NEWSLETTER Update Yourself
    VOLUME 50, OCTOBER 2018 THE NEWSLETTER Update Yourself Stamp Duty not Necessary for Enforcing Foreign Award he Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in its recent judgment in the case of Shriram EPC Limited vs. Rioglass Solar SA decided on 13.09.2018, has T observed that foreign award is enforceable without paying any stamp duty un- der the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (“Stamp Act”). The dispute at hand arose before the Hon’ble Supreme Court on appeal filed by Shriram EPC Limited (“Appellant”) against the decision of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court. Initially, Rioglass Solar SA (“Respondent”) filed a petition before the Single Bench of the Madras High Court to enforce a foreign award delivered by the International Chambers of Commerce in London against Appellant. The Single Bench of the Madras High Court en- forced the foreign award and the Appellant filed an appeal against this enforcement before the Division Bench of the Madras High Court. One Inside this issue: of the contentions raised by the Appellant before the Division Bench was that stamp duty had not UPDATE YOURSELF been paid by the Respondent on the foreign Maharashtra State Ad- 2 award under the provisions of the Stamp Act. The Division Bench of the Madras High vance Ruling Appellate Court decided the appeal in favour of the Respondent and upheld the enforcement of the foreign award. Consequently, the dispute was brought before the Supreme Court, Karnataka HC Imposed 2 but only to the extent of the question of law that whether stamp duty is payable on a Cost on Deputy VAT foreign award under the provisions of the Stamp Act.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Supreme Court and High Courts Judges (As on 01.02.2021)
    AS ON 01/02/2021 JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND THE HIGH COURTS (List of Judges arranged according to date of initial appointment) [Sanctioned Strength of Judges of High Court also includes the Chief Justice of High Court] AS ON 01/02/2021 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Sanctioned Judge Strength: 34 (List of Judges arranged according to date of appointment) Sl. Name of the Judge Date of Date of REMARKS No. S/Shri Justice appointment Retirement [Parent High Court] 1 SHARAD ARVIND BOBDE 12/04/2013 23/04/2021 CJI W.E.F. 18.11.2019 [BOMBAY] 2 NUTHALAPATI VENKATA RAMANA 17/02/2014 26/08/2022 ANDHRA PRADESH 3 ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN 07/07/2014 12/08/2021 BAR 4 UDAY UMESH LALIT 13/08/2014 08/11/2022 BAR 5 AJAY MANIKRAO KHANWILKAR 13/05/2016 29/07/2022 BOMBAY 6 DR. DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD 13/05/2016 10/11/2024 BOMBAY 7 ASHOK BHUSHAN 13/05/2016 04/07/2021 ALLAHABAD 8 LAVU NAGESWARA RAO 13/05/2016 07/06/2022 BAR 9 SANJAY KISHAN KAUL 17/02/2017 25/12/2023 DELHI 10 SHANTANAGOUDAR MOHAN MALLIKARJUNAGOUDA 17/02/2017 04/05/2023 KARNATAKA 11 S. ABDUL NAZEER 17/02/2017 04/01/2023 KARANTAKA 12 NAVIN SINHA 17/02/2017 18/08/2021 PATNA 13 MS. INDU MALHOTRA 27/04/2018 13/03/2021 BAR 14 KUMARI INDIRA BANERJEE 07/08/2018 23/09/2022 CALCUTTA 15 VINEET SARAN 07/08/2018 10/05/2022 ALLAHABAD 16 KUTTIYIL MATHEW JOSEPH 07/08/2018 16/06/2023 KERALA 17 HEMANT GUPTA [H] 02/11/2018 16/10/2022 PUNJAB & HARYANA 18 RAMAYYAGARI SUBHASH REDDY 02/11/2018 04/01/2022 TELANGANA 19 MUKESHKUMAR RASIKBHAI SHAH 02/11/2018 15/05/2023 GUJARAT 20 AJAY RASTOGI 02/11/2018 17/06/2023 RAJASTHAN 21 DINESH MAHESHWARI 18/01/2019 14/05/2023 RAJASTHAN 22 SANJIV KHANNA 18/01/2019 13/05/2025 DELHI 23 BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI 24/05/2019 23/11/2025 BOMBAY 24 SURYA KANT 24/05/2019 09/02/2027 PUNJAB & HARYANA 25 ANIRUDDHA BOSE 24/05/2019 10/04/2024 CALCUTTA 26 AJJIKUTTIRA SOMAIAH BOPANNA 24/05/2019 19/05/2024 KARNATAKA 27 KRISHNA MURARI 23/09/2019 08/07/2023 ALLAHABAD 28 SHRIPATHI RAVINDRA BHAT 23/09/2019 20/10/2023 DELHI 29 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Supreme Court Judgment in the Case of Samsung — Paresh P
    88 Webinars held by various Zones from 1-7-2020 to 16-8-2020 Chairman at Various Webinars Shri S. R. CA. H. M. Singhvi, CA. Anil Garg, Shri Ganesh Dr. Ashok Saraf, Dr. K. Shivaram Wadhwa, Adv., Jaipur - 21-7-2020 Indore - 22-7-2020 Purohit, Sr. Adv., Guwahati - Sr. Adv., Mumbai - New Delhi Sr. Adv., Jabalpur - 24-7-2020 25-7-2020 20-7-2020 23-7-2020 Dr. M. V. K. Moorthy, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dr. M. V. K. Moorthy, CA. H. L. Madan, Dr. K. Shivaram, Adv., Hyderabad - J. K. Ranka (Retd.), Adv., Hyderabad - New Delhi - Sr. Adv., Mumbai - 25-7-2020 Jaipur - 26-7-2020 8-8-2020 9-8-2020 16-8-2020 Speakers at Various Webinars CA. Annapurna Srikanth Shri Kapil Goel, Adv., Shri V. P. Gupta, Adv., Shri Ajay R. Singh, Adv., CA. Dhinal Shah, CA. Rajesh Mehta, - 1-7-2020 New Delhi - 20-7-2020 New Delhi - 21-7-2020 Mumbai - 22-7-2020 Ahmedabad - 23-7-2020 Indore - 24-7-2020 CA. Paresh P. Shah, CA. Hetal N. Shah, CA. Bharat Sachdev, Shri N. P. Jain, Adv., CA. Deepabali Das, CA. A. K. Srivastava, Mumbai - 25-7-2020 Bengaluru - 25-7-2020 Thane - 25-7-2020 Kolkata - 26-7-2020 Tumakuru - 8-8-2020 New Delhi - 8-8-2020 Shri N. P. Jain, Adv., CA. Unnikrishnan M., CA. Sriram K., CA. (Dr.) Girish Ahuja, Smt. Nikita R. Badheka, Shri Samir Jani, Kolkata - 8-8-2020 Trivandrum - 9-8-2020 Hyderabad - 9-8-2020 New Delhi - 16-8-2020 National President Secretary General 2 C O N T E N T S Pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Revenue), Government of Tripura, Agartala
    Page 1 of 54 HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA A_G_A_R_T_A_L_A RFA. No. 11 of 2015 1. The State of Tripura, represented by the Secretary (Revenue), Government of Tripura, Agartala. 2. The Secretary, to the Government of Tripura, Department of Information, Cultural Affairs & Tourism, Agartala. 3. The Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of Tripura, Agartala. 4. The District Magistrate & Collector, West Tripura, Agartala. …..Defendant-appellants -V E R S U S- 1. Smti. Bibhu Kumari Devi, wife of Lt. Kirit Bikram Kishore Debbarman. 2. Shri Pradyut Bikram Kishore Debbarman, son of late Kirit Bikram Kishore Debbarman, Both are residents of Palace Compound, Agartala, P.S. West Agartala, District: West Tripura. ….. Plaintiff-respondents B_E_F_O_R_E HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AKIL KURESHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM LODH For Appellant(s) : Mr. A. K. Bhowmik, A.G. Mr. D. Bhattacharjee, G.A. Mr. D. Chakraborty, Sr. Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. D. R. Chawdhury, Advocate. Mr. S. Sarkar, Advocate. Date of hearing : 25.11.2019 Date of judgment And order : 06.01.2020 Whether fit for reporting : YES Page 2 of 54 J_ U_ D_ G _M_ E_ N_ T (ARINDAM LODH, J) We have taken up the present civil appeal to determine the ownership of a monument, a proud edifies of the State of Tripura called „Nirmahal Palace‟ popularly known as „Rudrasagar‟ comprising of huge land and water body constructed by Lt. Maharaja Bir Bikram Kishore Manikya Bahadur which symbolises rich cultural heritage of the State. [2] The entire land is situated under Mouja-Rudijala and recorded under shabek khatian No.510 bearing CS plot No.1003, 1016/3317 and 1002 present khatian No.291, Hal plot No.1437,1439, 1440 and situated in a land measuring 6.01 acres described in details in the schedule of the plaint.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Dated 01.11.2017 Reg. Elevation of an Advocate in Tripura High Court
    SUPREME COURT OF INDIA This file relates to the proposal for appointment of Shri Arindam Lodh, Advocate and Shri Data Mohan Jamatia, Judicial Officer, as Judges of the Tripura High Court. The above recommendation made by the Chief Justice of the Tripura High Court, in consultation with his only colleague on the Bench, has the concurrence of the Chief Minister and the Governor of the State of Tripura. In order to ascertain suitability of Shri Arindam Lodh, Advocate and Shri Data Mohan Jamatia, Judicial Officer for elevation to the High Court, we have consulted our colleague who is conversant with the affairs of the Tripura High Court. A copy of his letter of opinion received in this regard is placed below. As regards Shri Arindam Lodh, Advocate, he qualifies the prescribed income and age criterion. Our consultee-colleague has found him suitable. Intelligence Bureau has reported that nothing adverse has come to notice against his integrity. As regards comments of Intelligence Bureau about his professional competence, we are of the view that professional competence can best be determined by the members of the higher judiciary who have the opportunity to observe his performance on a daily basis. The High Court Collegium has recommended his name considering his legal acumen, background, standing at the Bar and experience including his performance as Law Officer of the Central Government. We have taken note of certain complaints received against Shri Arindam Lodh. As per fresh I.B. inputs placed in the file, the allegations in these complaints pertaining to his integrity are not corroborated.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Newsletter August-2020
    OF SOUTHERN INDIA REGIONAL COUNCIL (SIRC) OF THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA (ICAI) August 2021 Vol: 6 Issue No: 124 Ernakulam Branch of SIRC of ICAI e-NEWSLETTER MessageChairman’s Beloved Members, I wish to start my communique by placing on record my deepest gratefulness for your extraordinary support, guidance and blessings as we complete 6 months of the term 2021-22. The journey so far has truly been a boundless learning and most importantly a really satisfying one. I hope and pray that I meet your expectations or at least reach half the benchmark set by my honorable forerunners. I humbly request for your continued in plan for the month such as financial literacy programmes, support, feedback and guidance so as to work better for our career counseling sessions, faculty development workshops for fraternity. college teachers, etc., apart from Independence Day and Onam celebrations. The recent notification regarding Multi-Disciplinary Firms on 8th July, 2021 could be a game changer to the profession as the I am sure the tax audit season is keeping you busy and hectic but reach, visibility and opportunity of our vocation widens multifold I wish to remind you to stay safe from the pandemic as the covid as we partner with the right and permitted experts. This I am sure cases are heaving in the State especially in Ernakulam District. would help the members to serve in a wider scope beyond the We would be arranging the second dose of vaccines for the ones traditional audit and tax practice. I feel it is a very welcome move who took in May.
    [Show full text]
  • Binder1 19.Pdf
    Page 1 of 63 HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA 1. WA NO.86 OF 2018 The State of Tripura & Ors. ----Appellant(s) Versus Saroj Bhattacharjee ----Respondent(s) 2. WA NO.90 OF 2018 The State of Tripura ----Appellant(s) Versus Tushar Kanti Bhattacharjee ----Respondent(s) WITH 3. WP(C) NO.829 OF 2018 Ajoy Debbarma ----Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Tripura & 2 Ors. ----Respondent(s) 4. WP(C) NO.865 OF 2018 Ashok Debbarma ----Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Tripura & 2 Ors. ----Respondent(s) 5. WP(C) NO.866 OF 2018 Debasish Saha ----Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Tripura & 2 Ors. ----Respondent(s) Page 2 of 63 6. WP(C) NO.867 OF 2018 Subrata Debbarma ----Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Tripura & 2 Ors. ----Respondent(s) 7. WP(C) NO.868 OF 2018 Prava Ranjan Debbarma ----Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Tripura & 2 Ors. ----Respondent(s) 8. WP(C) NO.869 OF 2018 Santi Debbarma ----Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Tripura & 2 Ors. ----Respondent(s) 9. WP(C) NO.870 OF 2018 Sashi Mohan Debbarma ----Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Tripura & 2 Ors. ----Respondent(s) 10. WP(C) NO.871 OF 2018 Hemanta Debbarma ----Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Tripura & 2 Ors. ----Respondent(s) Page 3 of 63 11. WP(C) NO.872 OF 2018 Siddhartha Sankar Kar ----Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Tripura & 2 Ors. ----Respondent(s) 12. WP(C) NO.873 OF 2018 Kamal Krishna Kalai ----Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Tripura & 2 Ors. ----Respondent(s) 13. WP(C) NO.874 OF 2018 Sunil Kr.
    [Show full text]
  • Compendium of Adjudications 2012-2013
    Press Council of India Agenda Item No. 5 Draft Adjudications based on recommendations of Inquiry Committee (Meetings held on 15-16.07.2013 at New Delhi and 23-24.07.2013 at Varanasi and 22-23.08.2013, 19-20.09.2013 and 28- 29.10.2013 at New Delhi) Complaints by the Press Section-13 Inquiry Committee-I Meeting held at New Delhi on 15-16.7.2013 1. Shri Prabodh Jamwal, Publisher, The Kashmir Times, Hindi Daily, Jammu, against the Director, DAVP, New Delhi. (13/100/11-12) 2. Shri Prabodh Jamwal, Publisher, The Jammu Prabhat, Jammu, against the Director, DAVP, New Delhi. (13/101/11-12) 3. Shri Prabodh Jamwal, Publisher, The Kashmir Times, English, Jammu, against the Director, DAVP, New Delhi. (13/122/11-12) 4. Complaint of Shri Govind Singh Bagravat, Editor, Sanjha Lokswami Susnair, Shazapur, M.P. against Smt. Rekha Rathore, SDM, Susnair, Shazapur, M.P. (13/141/10-11) 5. Complaint of Shri Naresh Khattar, Chief Editor, Daurti Delhi, New Delhi against Shri Suresh Malik, Chairman, Shri Sanatan Dharam Mandir, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi and Police Authorities. (13/30/11-12) 6. Complaint of Shri Ramchandre Kumar Anjana, Correspondent, Hindustan Dainik, Bokaro against Shri Ramod Kumar Singh, SHO, Police Station, Bokaro, Jharkhand. (13/23/10-11) Inquiry Committee-II Meeting held at Varanasi on 23-24.7.2013 7. Complaint of Shri Bachhu Lal Dwivedi, Publisher/Editor, Khiri Kranti Darshan, Khiri, Uttar Pradesh against Shri Om Prakash Tiwari, Advocate and Police Authority. (13/26/10-11) 8. Complaint of Shri Kanhyalal Vishvakarma, Chief Editor, Bundelkhand Subarta, Lalitpur, U.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Judges of the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts
    AS ON 01/06/2021 JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND THE HIGH COURTS (List of Judges arranged according to date of initial appointment) [Sanctioned Strength of Judges of High Court also includes the Chief Justice of High Court] AS ON 01/06/2021 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Sanctioned Judge Strength: 34 (List of Judges arranged according to date of appointment) Sl. Name of the Judge Date of Date of REMARKS No. S/Shri Justice appointment Retirement [Parent High Court] 1 NUTHALAPATI VENKATA RAMANA 17/02/2014 26/08/2022 CJI W.E.F. 24.04.2021 ANDHRA PRADESH 2 ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN 07/07/2014 12/08/2021 BAR 3 UDAY UMESH LALIT 13/08/2014 08/11/2022 BAR 4 AJAY MANIKRAO KHANWILKAR 13/05/2016 29/07/2022 BOMBAY 5 DR. DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD 13/05/2016 10/11/2024 BOMBAY 6 ASHOK BHUSHAN 13/05/2016 04/07/2021 ALLAHABAD 7 LAVU NAGESWARA RAO 13/05/2016 07/06/2022 BAR 8 SANJAY KISHAN KAUL 17/02/2017 25/12/2023 DELHI 9 S. ABDUL NAZEER 17/02/2017 04/01/2023 KARANTAKA 10 NAVIN SINHA 17/02/2017 18/08/2021 PATNA 11 KUMARI INDIRA BANERJEE 07/08/2018 23/09/2022 CALCUTTA 12 VINEET SARAN 07/08/2018 10/05/2022 ALLAHABAD 13 KUTTIYIL MATHEW JOSEPH 07/08/2018 16/06/2023 KERALA 14 HEMANT GUPTA 02/11/2018 16/10/2022 PUNJAB & HARYANA 15 RAMAYYAGARI SUBHASH REDDY 02/11/2018 04/01/2022 TELANGANA 16 MUKESHKUMAR RASIKBHAI SHAH 02/11/2018 15/05/2023 GUJARAT 17 AJAY RASTOGI 02/11/2018 17/06/2023 RAJASTHAN 18 DINESH MAHESHWARI 18/01/2019 14/05/2023 RAJASTHAN 19 SANJIV KHANNA 18/01/2019 13/05/2025 DELHI 20 BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI 24/05/2019 23/11/2025 BOMBAY 21 SURYA KANT 24/05/2019 09/02/2027 PUNJAB & HARYANA 22 ANIRUDDHA BOSE 24/05/2019 10/04/2024 CALCUTTA 23 AJJIKUTTIRA SOMAIAH BOPANNA 24/05/2019 19/05/2024 KARNATAKA 24 KRISHNA MURARI 23/09/2019 08/07/2023 ALLAHABAD 25 SHRIPATHI RAVINDRA BHAT 23/09/2019 20/10/2023 DELHI 26 V.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Supreme Court and High Courts Judges (As on 01.07.2019)
    AS ON 01/07/2019 JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND THE HIGH COURTS (List of Judges arranged according to date of initial appointment) AS ON 01/07/2019 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Sanctioned Judge Strength: 31 (List of Judges arranged according to date of appointment) Sl. Name of the Judge Date of Date of REMARKS No. S/Shri Justice appointment Retirement [Parent High Court] 1 RANJAN GOGOI 23/04/2012 17/11/2019 CJI W.E.F. 03.10.2018 [GAUHATI] 2 SHARAD ARVIND BOBDE 12/04/2013 23/04/2021 BOMBAY 3 NUTHALAPATI VENKATA RAMANA 17/02/2014 26/08/2022 ANDHRA PRADESH 4 ARUN KUMAR MISHRA 07/07/2014 02/09/2020 MADHYA PRADESH 5 ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN 07/07/2014 12/08/2021 BAR 6 ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE 13/08/2014 27/08/2019 MADHYA PRADESH 7 SMT. R. BANUMATHI 13/08/2014 19/07/2020 MADRAS 8 UDAY UMESH LALIT 13/08/2014 08/11/2022 BAR 9 AJAY MANIKRAO KHANWILKAR 13/05/2016 29/07/2022 BOMBAY 10 DR. DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD 13/05/2016 10/11/2024 BOMBAY 11 ASHOK BHUSHAN 13/05/2016 04/07/2021 ALLAHABAD 12 LAVU NAGESWARA RAO 13/05/2016 07/06/2022 BAR 13 SANJAY KISHAN KAUL 17/02/2017 25/12/2023 DELHI 14 S.M. MALLIKARJUNAGOUDA 17/02/2017 04/05/2023 KARNATAKA 15 S. ABDUL NAZEER 17/02/2017 04/01/2023 KARANTAKA 16 NAVIN SINHA 17/02/2017 18/08/2021 PATNA 17 DEEPAK GUPTA 17/02/2017 06/05/2020 HIMACHAL PRADESH 18 MS.
    [Show full text]
  • Order Dated 17-06-2021 Regarding Arrangement of Working of the High Court and the District
    HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA NCJ.F.44(1 )(c)-HC/2021/11899 17th June, 2021 ORDER The High Court took into consideration the present situation of corona ' virus in the State and also took note of the lock-down restrictions with relaxed conditions formulated by the State Government. Bearing in mind these factors the High Court reviewed the arrangement of working of the High Court and the District Courts (including Family Courts) w..e.f. 20th June, 2021. Accordingly in p~rtial , modification ..o .f ·the earlier orders and in particular the order dated 16.05.2021, following arrangements are made, which shall be operative with effect from 20.06.2021: For the High Court: In substitution of paragraphs (i), (ii) and (iii) of the Order dated 16th May, 2021 it is provided that- (i) The Registry shall accept filing of all urgent as well as non-urgent cases till 2.00 pm on all working days; (ii) The High Court shall take up hearing of all urgent as well as non­ urgent cases., of Part-I matters i.e . .for Motion, Order and Admission listed on a given day, such that the hearing hours shall not continue beyond the first working session of the High Court. In other words, such hearing shall take place only up to 1.15 pm; (iii) The Registry shall place for Admission hearing all urgent as well as non-urgent cases which -areiiled-and -wnich--are ready for hearing according to its turn; ------- -------------. -=--=-- -· - (iv) Previous arrangement contained in clause (iii) of the order dated ___ ~~:- M~~~~2021 -for continuation of interim orders which had limited life automatically, shall be discontinued from 20th June, 2021 onwards.
    [Show full text]
  • India Business Law Journal India Business Law Journal
    WWW.INDILAW.COM JUNE 2016 VOLUME 10 | ISSUE 1 INDIA BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL LAW BUSINESS INDIA INDIA BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL LEGAL INTELLIGENCE FOR IN-HOUSE COUNSEL PARTNERSHIP What it means and why it may matter to clients Mitigating risk in M&A deals The top international law firms for India work JUNE 2016 How a court ruling increased stamp duty on mergers Vantage Asia The fallout from India’s new tax agreement with Mauritius HONOURED TO BE RECOGNIZED AS LEADERS IN INDIA From critical financings to complex cross-border transactions, we are proud to help clients with the deals shaping India today. BEIJING FRANKFURT HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES MUNICH NEW YORK SÃO PAULO SEOUL SINGAPORE TOKYO WASHINGTON, DC Milbank.com XXX CONTENTS 17 32 23 CONTENTS 3 LEADER 17 COVER STORY 26 SPOTLIGHT Are legacies built by strong men Partnership Commercial shields and women or by the institutions What it means to be a partner at Corporate buyers are warming to they create? an Indian law firm and why it the idea of M&A insurance in may matter to clients a bid to protect themselves 4 INBOX from transaction risks 22 VANTAGE POINT 5 MARKET PULSE Murali Neelakantan argues that India’s 32 WHAT’S THE DEAL? • Shah in shock ELP exit legal profession is insecure, has lost its A cat among the pigeons • Adsule jumps to JP Infra as GC commitment to public service and is Stamp duty on mergers is par for the • Khan to head CAM’s national failing to move with the times course, but a recent ruling significantly funds practice increases the burden 23 SPOTLIGHT 8 THE WRAP Paradise
    [Show full text]