DOCSLIB.ORG

Compendium of Adjudications 2012-2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Press Council of India Agenda Item No. 5 Draft Adjudications based on recommendations of Inquiry Committee (Meetings held on 15-16.07.2013 at New Delhi and 23-24.07.2013 at Varanasi and 22-23.08.2013, 19-20.09.2013 and 28- 29.10.2013 at New Delhi) Complaints by the Press Section-13 Inquiry Committee-I Meeting held at New Delhi on 15-16.7.2013 1. Shri Prabodh Jamwal, Publisher, The Kashmir Times, Hindi Daily, Jammu, against the Director, DAVP, New Delhi. (13/100/11-12) 2. Shri Prabodh Jamwal, Publisher, The Jammu Prabhat, Jammu, against the Director, DAVP, New Delhi. (13/101/11-12) 3. Shri Prabodh Jamwal, Publisher, The Kashmir Times, English, Jammu, against the Director, DAVP, New Delhi. (13/122/11-12) 4. Complaint of Shri Govind Singh Bagravat, Editor, Sanjha Lokswami Susnair, Shazapur, M.P. against Smt. Rekha Rathore, SDM, Susnair, Shazapur, M.P. (13/141/10-11) 5. Complaint of Shri Naresh Khattar, Chief Editor, Daurti Delhi, New Delhi against Shri Suresh Malik, Chairman, Shri Sanatan Dharam Mandir, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi and Police Authorities. (13/30/11-12) 6. Complaint of Shri Ramchandre Kumar Anjana, Correspondent, Hindustan Dainik, Bokaro against Shri Ramod Kumar Singh, SHO, Police Station, Bokaro, Jharkhand. (13/23/10-11) Inquiry Committee-II Meeting held at Varanasi on 23-24.7.2013 7. Complaint of Shri Bachhu Lal Dwivedi, Publisher/Editor, Khiri Kranti Darshan, Khiri, Uttar Pradesh against Shri Om Prakash Tiwari, Advocate and Police Authority. (13/26/10-11) 8. Complaint of Shri Kanhyalal Vishvakarma, Chief Editor, Bundelkhand Subarta, Lalitpur, U.P. against the local police authorities. (13/120/10-11) 9. Complaint of Shri Omprakash Verma, Editor, Raatriman Newspaper Baharaich, U.P. against the SHO, District Baharaich, U.P. (13/131/10-11) 10. Complaint of Shri Lokesh Kumar, Journalist, Amar Ujala, Lakhimpur Khiri, U.P. against the then Sector Magistrate, Sharda Nagar, Presently Assistant Engineer, Irrigation Department, Sharda Nagar, District – Lakhimpur Khiri, U.P. (13/129/10-11) 11. Complaint of Shri Mahesh Chander Verma, Editor, Jwala Ke Sath, Hathras, District Mahamayanagar, Uttar Pradesh against the police authorities. (13/172/10-11) 12. Complaint of Shri Nihal Hussain, Chief Editor/Publisher, Sab Pe Nazar, Moradabad, U.P. against the police authorities and state administration. (13/6/11-12) 13. Complaint of Dr. Neeraj Kumar, Journalist, Naya Kya Hai, Barot, District Bagpat, U.P. against SHO, Barot, U.P. (13/21/11-12) 14. Complaint of Mohd. Akram khan, Editor, Brashtachar Kyoun, Moradapad, U.P. against the anti social elements and local police authorities, U.P. (13/76/11-12) 15. Complaint of Shri Vinod Kumar Kudeshiya, Chief Correspondent, Dreemland, Farukhabad, U.P. against Shri Haridas Verma, Sub-Inspector, Fatehgarh, Farukhabad, U.P. (13/158/11-12) 16. Complaint of Shri Prabhakar Shukla, Chief Correspondent, Detective Media, Kushinagar, U.P. against the Shri Sanjay Singh, Division Development Officer, Kushinagar, U.P. (13/75/11-12) 17. Complaint by (i) Uttar Pradesh Journalist Association, Hathras (ii) Press Club, Hathras (iii) Human Rights Association of India, Hathras, U.P. against the police, Hathras, U.P. (13/140/11-12) 18. Complaint of Shri Nizamuddin Siddiqui, Correspondent/Owner, Salam Banda, Uttar Pradesh against local police and mining mafia. (13/26/12-13) Inquiry Committee-I Meeting held at New Delhi on 22.8.2013 19. Complaint of Shri Mahaveer Jain, Correspondent, Dainik Maru Lehar, Rajasthan against Shri Mevaram Jain, MLA, Barmer, Rajasthan. (13/42/12-13) Inquiry Committee-II Meeting held at New Delhi on 19-20.9.2013 20. Complaint of Shri Murli Prithyani, Correspondent, Prabal Shrishti, Katni, M.P. against the district administration. (13/150/10-11) 21. Complaint of Shri Lakshman Singh Maidh, Editor, Rashtriya Chetana , District Naguar , Rajasthan against Dr. Surbhi Vashishth and Dr. Vinayak Gaur, Medical Officers, Government Hospital, Boravad, District Naguar, Rajasthan. (13/150/09-10) 22. Complaint of Shri S. Manimaran, editor, Thinaboomi, Tamil Daily, Madurai, Tamil Nadu against Tamil Nadu Administration. (13/88/10-11) 23. Complaint of Shri Sanjay Bhati, Owner/Publisher/Printer, Supreme News, Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P. against the District Magistrate, Gautam Budhnagar and Dainik Jagran, Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P. (13/136/10-11) 24. Complaint of Shri Mohan Sharma, Editor, Dainik Rajasthani Chirag & Weekly Kranti Bigul, Bikaner, Rajasthan against Directorate of Information & Public Relations, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur. (13/27/11-12) 25. Complaint of Shri Shakti Pratap Singh, Local Correspondent, Aaj, Hindi Dainik, Allahabad, U.P. against S.H.O. & C.O., Manda, Allahabad, U.P.(13/25/11-12) 26. Complaint of Shri Harjit Dua, Journalist, Delhi against Shri Dilbar Gothi, Metro Editor, Navbharat Times, Shri Deepak Gothi, & Taj Githi, Editor and Reporter, Bandemataram, Delhi. (13/142/11-12) 27. Complaint of Shri Tapas Kumar Basu, Editor, Halfil Khabor, Bengali Fortnightly, West Bengal against Director, Information & Public Relations Department, Government of West Bengal, Kolkata. (13/36/12-13) Inquiry Committee-I Meeting held at New Delhi on 28-29.10.2013 28. Complaint of Shri Mahavir Jain, Correspondent, Maru Lehar, Barmer, Rajasthan against the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Barmer and Director, Department of Local Bodies, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. (13/84/12-13) 29. Complaint of Dr. Sajal Basu, Chief of News Bureau, Indian News Service, Kolkata against Department of Information & Cultural Affairs, Government of West Bengal, Kolkata. (13/150/11-12) 30. Complaint of Shri Rajbahadur Yadav, Photographer, Hindustan, Sultanpur, U.P. against the local Police authorities. (13/146/12-13) 31. Complaint of Shri Rajiv Maharaj, Journalist, Aaj, Lakhimpur, U.P. against Shri Ramsingh, Narender Verma, Pawan Kumar, Tekikuda, holagadh. (13/49/12-13) 32. Complaint of Shri Jasbir Singh Sukhija, Chief Editor/Publisher/Printer/Proprietor, Dashmesh Pita, Patiala, Punjab against Shri Ishwinder Singh, District Public Relations Officer, Patiala. (13/63/11-12) Press Council of India Agenda Item No. 5 Draft Adjudications based on recommendations of Inquiry Committee (Meetings held on 15-16.07.2013 at New Delhi and 23-24.07.2013 at Varanasi and 22-23.08.2013, 19-20.09.2013 and 28- 29.10.2013 at New Delhi) Complaints Against the Press Section-14 Inquiry Committee-I Meeting held at New Delhi on 15-16.7.2013 1. Complaint of Shri Kesi Ram Maretiya, Sumerpur, Rajasthan against the editor, Samaj Ka Settu, Pali, Rajasthan. (14/403/10-11) 2. Complaint of Shri Karuna Kanta Barua, IAS, (Retd.) Guwahati, Assam against the editor, The Telegraph, Kolkata. (14/389/09-10) 3-4. Complaints of Shri Mriganka Bhattacharjee, Working Chairman, Crime Prevention Council of Assam, Shillongpatty, Dispur, Guwahati against the editors, (i) Asomiya Pratidin, (ii) The Telegraph, Guwahati, (14/615&618/09-10) 5. Complaint of Shri K.O. Samuel, Kolkata against the editor, The Statesman, Kolkata. (14/419/10- 11) 6. Complaints of General Secretary, Popular Front of India, Kalindi Kunj, New Delhi against the editor, Hindustan Times, Lucknow. (14/147/12-13) 7. Complaints of General Secretary, Popular Front of India, Kalindi Kunj, New Delhi against the editor, The Inquilab, Noida. (14/151/12-13) 8. Complaints of General Secretary, Popular Front of India, Kalindi Kunj, New Delhi against the editor, Indian Express, Chennai. (14/154/12-13) 9. Complaints of General Secretary, Popular Front of India, Kalindi Kunj, New Delhi against the editor, Nav Bharat Times, New Delhi. (14/155/12-13) 10. Complaints of General Secretary, Popular Front of India, Kalindi Kunj, New Delhi against the editor, Deccan Chronicle, Kochi. (14/157/12-13) 11. Complaint of Shri Sushil Kumar Agarwal, Chairman, Nagar Pachayat, Latehar, Jharkhand against the editor, Dainik Jagran, Ranchi, Jharkhand. (14/26/10-11) 12. Complaint of Shri Sushil Kumar Agarwal, Chairman, Gandhi Inter Mahavidhalya, Latehar, Jharkhand against the editor, Dainik Jagran,Ranchi, Jharkhand. (14/325/10-11) 13. Complaint of Dr. Kunwar Virender Pratap Singh, (through Advocate Shri Amit Kumar) Sasaram, Bihar against the editor, Hindustan, Patna, Bihar. (14/693/10-11) 14. Complaint of Dr. Murgesh Vaishnav, Consulting Psychiatrist and Sex Therapist, Ahmedabad, Gujarat against the editor, 'Sandesh', Gujarati Daily, Ahmedabad. (14/706/10-11) 15-16. Complaints of Shri Kiran S. Sahu, Wing Commander (Retd.), President, Kendujhar Citizens Forum, Utkai Minerals Pvt. Ltd., District Keonjhar, Orissa against the editors (i) Samaja (ii) Prajatantra, Cuttack. (14/95-96/10-11) 17. Complaint of Shri R. K. Agarwal, Mananging Director, Hi-Tech Chemicals (P) Ltd., Jamshedpur, Jharkhand against the editor, Prabhat Khabar, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand. (14/138/10-11) 18. Complaint of Mohd. Noor Hussain, State President, Gonda, Jharkhand against the editor, Prabhat Khabar, Ranchi, Jharkhand. (14/113/10-11) 19. Complaint of Shri Biswajit Pattnaik, Angul (through advocate), Orissa against the editor, Samay, Bhubaneswar, Orissa. (14/513/10-11) 20. Complaint of Smt. Hajiyani Neelofar Khanam, W/o haji Mohd. Ayub Khan, Ex-MLA, Katabanji, Balangir, Odisha against the editor, Samaya, Oriya Daily. (14/628/10-11) Inquiry Committee-II Meeting held at Varanasi on 23-24.7.2013 21. Complaint of Shri Suresh Chandre Johri, Eye Consultant, District Joint Hospital, Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh against the editor, Royal Bulletin, Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh. (14/567/09-10) 22. Complaint of Shri Amarkant Singh, District Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Gonda, Uttar Pradesh against the editor, Amar Ujala. (14/266/09-10) 23. Complaint of Shri Rituraj Shukla, Kapil Ganga T.V and Shri Ashok Kumar Shukla, Aabkari, Aabkari Director, U.P. against the editor, Bismilla Saptahik, Gorakhpur, U.P. (14/519/09-10) 24. Complaint of Shri Rajesh Kumar, District - Rambahi Nagar, Uttar Pradesh against the editor, Dainik Bhaskar, Ranchi, Jharkhand. (14/422/10-11) 25. Complaint of Mohd. Taiyab Palaki, Municipal Corporation, Mau, U.P. against the editor, Brahmlekhani, Mau, Uttar Pradesh.
Recommended publications
  • Theft and Loss of Electricity in an Indian State1

    Theft and Loss of Electricity in an Indian State1

    Theft and Loss of Electricity in an Indian State1 Miriam Golden University of California, Los Angeles Princeton University [email protected] Brian Min University of Michigan [email protected] April 9, 2012 Version 3.0 Comments welcome. Graphics require printing in color. 1An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2011 Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, September 2–5, Seattle and at the 2nd IGC-ISI India Development Pol- icy Conference, December 19–20, 2011, ISI Delhi Center. For research assistance, we thank Julia YuJung Lee. Funding was provided by the International Growth Centre and the Center for Inter- national Business Education and Research at the University of California at Los Angeles. Golden acknowledges the hospitality of the Center for the Study of Democratic Politics, Princeton Univer- sity. The authors are solely responsible for the views presented here. Abstract Utilizing data from the power corporation of Uttar Pradesh, India’s most populous state, we study the politics of electricity theft over a ten year period (2000–09). Our results show that electricity theft is substantial in magnitude. The extent of theft varies with the electoral cycle of the state. In years when elections to the State Assembly are held, electricity theft is significantly greater than in other years. Theft is increasing with the intensity of tubewells, suggesting that it is linked to unmetered electricity use by farmers. Incumbent legislative members of the state assembly are more likely to be reelected as power theft in their locality increases. Our interpretation of these various results is that power theft exhibits characteristics consistent with the political capture of public service delivery by local elites.
  • Section-VIII : Laboratory Services

    Section-VIII : Laboratory Services

    Section‐VIII Laboratory Services 8. Laboratory Services 8.1 Haemoglobin Test ‐ State level As can be seen from the graph, hemoglobin test is being carried out at almost every FRU studied However, 10 percent medical colleges do not provide the basic Hb test. Division wise‐ As the graph shows, 96 percent of the FRUs on an average are offering this service, with as many as 13 divisions having 100 percent FRUs contacted providing basic Hb test. Hemoglobin test is not available at District Women Hospital (Mau), District Women Hospital (Budaun), CHC Partawal (Maharajganj), CHC Kasia (Kushinagar), CHC Ghatampur (Kanpur Nagar) and CHC Dewa (Barabanki). 132 8.2 CBC Test ‐ State level Complete Blood Count (CBC) test is being offered at very few FRUs. While none of the sub‐divisional hospitals are having this facility, only 25 percent of the BMCs, 42 percent of the CHCs and less than half of the DWHs contacted are offering this facility. Division wise‐ As per the graph above, only 46 percent of the 206 FRUs studied across the state are offering CBC (Complete Blood Count) test service. None of the FRUs in Jhansi division is having this service. While 29 percent of the health facilities in Moradabad division are offering this service, most others are only a shade better. Mirzapur (83%) followed by Gorakhpur (73%) are having maximum FRUs with this facility. CBC test is not available at Veerangna Jhalkaribai Mahila Hosp Lucknow (Lucknow), Sub Divisional Hospital Sikandrabad, Bullandshahar, M.K.R. HOSPITAL (Kanpur Nagar), LBS Combined Hosp (Varanasi),
  • Benchmark Survey of Horticulture Crops in Uttar Pradesh Area and Production Estimation

    Benchmark Survey of Horticulture Crops in Uttar Pradesh Area and Production Estimation

    Benchmark Survey of Horticulture Crops in Uttar Pradesh Area and Production Estimation REPORT Sponsored by: Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Planning, Government of Uttar Pradesh Submitted by: Nomita P. Kumar & Kavita Baliyan GIRI INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES (An Autonomous Institute Funded by ICSSR and Govt. Of UttarPradesh) Sector - O, Aliganj Housing Scheme LUCKNOW - 226024, U.P. INDIA April 2020 PREFACE Horticulture is an important component of agriculture having significant role in the economy of the country. India's varied agro-climatic conditions provides an additional advantage in favour of growing of a wide variety of horticultural crops such as fruits & vegetables, tuber crops, plantation crops, flowers, spices & condiments etc. Commercial importance of horticulture crops has also been increasing gaining all over the world as these crops contribute significantly to the country's economy. Various horticulture crops also play an important role in human nutrition, preventing diseases and contributing to the nation‟s development and prosperity. In particular, the horticulture crops such as fruits and vegetables are rich source of vitamins, minerals, proteins and carbohydrates that are essential in human diet. Similarly, other crops like flowers and ornamental crops enhance aesthetic value of our environment while medicinal crops yield pharmaceutical constituents. Thus, horticulture assumes a great importance in food and nutritional security, general health and well -being of our population. Horticulture crops form a vital part in the Indian agricultural production. India is the second largest producer of fruits and vegetables in the world. Cultivation, marketing and processing of these crops generate significant employment and livelihood opportunities in many parts of the country.
  • THE NEWSLETTER Update Yourself

    THE NEWSLETTER Update Yourself

    VOLUME 50, OCTOBER 2018 THE NEWSLETTER Update Yourself Stamp Duty not Necessary for Enforcing Foreign Award he Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in its recent judgment in the case of Shriram EPC Limited vs. Rioglass Solar SA decided on 13.09.2018, has T observed that foreign award is enforceable without paying any stamp duty un- der the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (“Stamp Act”). The dispute at hand arose before the Hon’ble Supreme Court on appeal filed by Shriram EPC Limited (“Appellant”) against the decision of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court. Initially, Rioglass Solar SA (“Respondent”) filed a petition before the Single Bench of the Madras High Court to enforce a foreign award delivered by the International Chambers of Commerce in London against Appellant. The Single Bench of the Madras High Court en- forced the foreign award and the Appellant filed an appeal against this enforcement before the Division Bench of the Madras High Court. One Inside this issue: of the contentions raised by the Appellant before the Division Bench was that stamp duty had not UPDATE YOURSELF been paid by the Respondent on the foreign Maharashtra State Ad- 2 award under the provisions of the Stamp Act. The Division Bench of the Madras High vance Ruling Appellate Court decided the appeal in favour of the Respondent and upheld the enforcement of the foreign award. Consequently, the dispute was brought before the Supreme Court, Karnataka HC Imposed 2 but only to the extent of the question of law that whether stamp duty is payable on a Cost on Deputy VAT foreign award under the provisions of the Stamp Act.
  • Rape’ Case Vaccine Likely by Nov-Dec T’Gana; Sets Record, Kills 6 Ravi Singh Sisodiya TNN Kamalakara Rao & Nary Measure

    Rape’ Case Vaccine Likely by Nov-Dec T’Gana; Sets Record, Kills 6 Ravi Singh Sisodiya TNN Kamalakara Rao & Nary Measure

    CCI NG 3.7 Product: TOIGoaBS PubDate: 14-10-2020 Zone: Goa Edition: 1 Page: TOIGOP05 User: misha.britto Time: 10-14-2020 00:38 Color: CMYK TIMES NATION THE TIMES OF INDIA, PANAJI - GOA | WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 14, 2020 K’TAKA POLICE REGISTER FIR AGAINST KANGANA DEEPAK KOCHHAR REMANDED TO ED CUSTODY TILL OVER HER TWEET AGAINST PROTESTING FARMERS OCT 17 IN ICICI BANK MONEY LAUNDERING CASE Law student turns hostile in Phase III results of Oxford Rain batters AP, Odisha & Chinmayanand ‘rape’ case vaccine likely by Nov-Dec T’gana; sets record, kills 6 Ravi Singh Sisodiya TNN Kamalakara Rao & nary measure. ral,” said a senior state govern- [email protected] planning for manufactu- Samson Raj TNN Some areas received heavy ment official. Lucknow: The 23-year-old ring, distribution and sto- gale with speeds reaching up to IMD officials said Andhra LLM student who had accused New Delhi: The results of rage is going on. The go- Visakhapatnam/Rajah- 70 kmph. IMD has forecast hea- Pradesh received 819 mm rain- former BJP MP phase three trials of the Ox- vernment also ensured mundry: At least six people di- vy to very heavy rainfall in so- fall as against the normal rain- Chinmaya- ford-AstraZeneca vaccine that there are adequate re- ed in different parts of Andhra me parts of the state on Wed- fall of 651.8mm as on October 13. nand of sexual being conducted in India sources to fund procure- Pradesh on Tuesday after a de- nesday. Such was the force of The deep depression also cau- exploitation could be available by “end- ment of required doses of ep depression in the Bay of the winds that a Bangladesh sed heavy rain and thundersho- last year, tur- November-early Decem- the vaccine.
  • Statement by Academic Fraternity Against the Post-Poll Violence and Politics of Terror in Bengal

    Statement by Academic Fraternity Against the Post-Poll Violence and Politics of Terror in Bengal

    Statement by Academic Fraternity Against the Post-poll Violence and Politics of Terror in Bengal Today, a large section of Bengali society is living under fear. Those who voted against the TMC in recent elections in Bengal are being victimized. Many of them are under attack from the TMC supported stormtroopers - their properties vandalized and livelihoods destroyed. There are reports that dozens of people, including women, have been killed in post-poll violence. Thousands of people have migrated to the adjoining states of Assam, Orissa, and Jharkhand due to fear of getting killed or raped by hooligans supported by the ruling party of Bengal. The police, local administration, civil society and media are either hand in gloves with the perpetrators or are silent, fearing the wrath of the state government. There are chances that the acts of violence and politics of terror perpetrated in Bengal can spread to other parts of India. Incidents such as the lynching of Mewalal, a member of the Mahadalit community, burning of 12 houses and trashing many others by anti-social elements in Purnea district of Bihar cannot be seen in isolation as these are adjoining areas of Bengal. We are deeply anxious and worried about the people who exercised their democratic right to free and fair vote, thus incurring the wrath of the ruling party in Bengal. We are deeply concerned about the weak and vulnerable sections of the society whose rights as citizens of India are being suppressed by the state government merely for exercising their right to freedom of expression and association.
  • List of Supreme Court and High Courts Judges (As on 01.02.2021)

    List of Supreme Court and High Courts Judges (As on 01.02.2021)

    AS ON 01/02/2021 JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND THE HIGH COURTS (List of Judges arranged according to date of initial appointment) [Sanctioned Strength of Judges of High Court also includes the Chief Justice of High Court] AS ON 01/02/2021 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Sanctioned Judge Strength: 34 (List of Judges arranged according to date of appointment) Sl. Name of the Judge Date of Date of REMARKS No. S/Shri Justice appointment Retirement [Parent High Court] 1 SHARAD ARVIND BOBDE 12/04/2013 23/04/2021 CJI W.E.F. 18.11.2019 [BOMBAY] 2 NUTHALAPATI VENKATA RAMANA 17/02/2014 26/08/2022 ANDHRA PRADESH 3 ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN 07/07/2014 12/08/2021 BAR 4 UDAY UMESH LALIT 13/08/2014 08/11/2022 BAR 5 AJAY MANIKRAO KHANWILKAR 13/05/2016 29/07/2022 BOMBAY 6 DR. DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD 13/05/2016 10/11/2024 BOMBAY 7 ASHOK BHUSHAN 13/05/2016 04/07/2021 ALLAHABAD 8 LAVU NAGESWARA RAO 13/05/2016 07/06/2022 BAR 9 SANJAY KISHAN KAUL 17/02/2017 25/12/2023 DELHI 10 SHANTANAGOUDAR MOHAN MALLIKARJUNAGOUDA 17/02/2017 04/05/2023 KARNATAKA 11 S. ABDUL NAZEER 17/02/2017 04/01/2023 KARANTAKA 12 NAVIN SINHA 17/02/2017 18/08/2021 PATNA 13 MS. INDU MALHOTRA 27/04/2018 13/03/2021 BAR 14 KUMARI INDIRA BANERJEE 07/08/2018 23/09/2022 CALCUTTA 15 VINEET SARAN 07/08/2018 10/05/2022 ALLAHABAD 16 KUTTIYIL MATHEW JOSEPH 07/08/2018 16/06/2023 KERALA 17 HEMANT GUPTA [H] 02/11/2018 16/10/2022 PUNJAB & HARYANA 18 RAMAYYAGARI SUBHASH REDDY 02/11/2018 04/01/2022 TELANGANA 19 MUKESHKUMAR RASIKBHAI SHAH 02/11/2018 15/05/2023 GUJARAT 20 AJAY RASTOGI 02/11/2018 17/06/2023 RAJASTHAN 21 DINESH MAHESHWARI 18/01/2019 14/05/2023 RAJASTHAN 22 SANJIV KHANNA 18/01/2019 13/05/2025 DELHI 23 BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI 24/05/2019 23/11/2025 BOMBAY 24 SURYA KANT 24/05/2019 09/02/2027 PUNJAB & HARYANA 25 ANIRUDDHA BOSE 24/05/2019 10/04/2024 CALCUTTA 26 AJJIKUTTIRA SOMAIAH BOPANNA 24/05/2019 19/05/2024 KARNATAKA 27 KRISHNA MURARI 23/09/2019 08/07/2023 ALLAHABAD 28 SHRIPATHI RAVINDRA BHAT 23/09/2019 20/10/2023 DELHI 29 V.
  • ODOP-Final-For-Digital-Low.Pdf

    ODOP-Final-For-Digital-Low.Pdf

    ODOP FINAL-NEW24.qxd 8/6/2018 3:46 PM Page 1 ODOP FINAL-NEW24.qxd 8/6/2018 3:46 PM Page 2 ODOP FINAL-NEW24.qxd 8/6/2018 3:46 PM Page 3 ODOP FINAL-NEW24.qxd 8/6/2018 3:46 PM Page 4 First published in India, 2018 Times Group A division of Books Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. The Times of India, 10 Daryaganj, New Delhi-110002 Phone: 011-39843333, Email: [email protected]; www.timesgroupbooks.com Copyright ©Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd., 2018 All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, tape, web distribution, information storage and retrieval systems or otherwise) without prior written permission of the publisher. Disclaimer Due care and diligence has been taken while editing and printing the Book. Neither the Publisher nor the Printer of the Book holds any responsibility for any mistake that may have crept in inadvertently. BCCL will be free from any liability for damages and losses of any nature arising from or related to the content. All disputes are subject to the jurisdiction of competent courts in Delhi. Digital Copy. Not for Sale. Printed at: Lustra Print Process Pvt. Ltd. ODOP FINAL-NEW24.qxd 8/6/2018 3:46 PM Page 5 ODOP FINAL-NEW24.qxd 8/6/2018 3:46 PM Page 6 ODOP FINAL-NEW24.qxd 8/6/2018 3:46 PM Page 7 ODOP FINAL-NEW24.qxd 8/6/2018 3:46 PM Page 8 ODOP FINAL-NEW24.qxd 8/6/2018 3:47 PM Page 9 jke ukbZd ODOP FINAL-NEW24.qxd 8/6/2018 3:47 PM Page 10 ODOP FINAL-NEW24.qxd 8/6/2018 3:47 PM Page 11 ;ksxh vkfnR;ukFk ODOP FINAL-NEW24.qxd 8/6/2018 3:47 PM Page 12 ODOP FINAL-NEW24.qxd 8/6/2018 3:47 PM Page 13 lR;nso ipkSjh ODOP FINAL-NEW24.qxd 8/6/2018 3:47 PM Page 14 ODOP FINAL-NEW24.qxd 8/6/2018 3:47 PM Page 15 vuwi pUnz ik.Ms; ODOP FINAL-NEW24.qxd 8/6/2018 3:47 PM Page 16 Contents Introduction .
  • Analysis of Supreme Court Judgment in the Case of Samsung — Paresh P

    Analysis of Supreme Court Judgment in the Case of Samsung — Paresh P

    88 Webinars held by various Zones from 1-7-2020 to 16-8-2020 Chairman at Various Webinars Shri S. R. CA. H. M. Singhvi, CA. Anil Garg, Shri Ganesh Dr. Ashok Saraf, Dr. K. Shivaram Wadhwa, Adv., Jaipur - 21-7-2020 Indore - 22-7-2020 Purohit, Sr. Adv., Guwahati - Sr. Adv., Mumbai - New Delhi Sr. Adv., Jabalpur - 24-7-2020 25-7-2020 20-7-2020 23-7-2020 Dr. M. V. K. Moorthy, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dr. M. V. K. Moorthy, CA. H. L. Madan, Dr. K. Shivaram, Adv., Hyderabad - J. K. Ranka (Retd.), Adv., Hyderabad - New Delhi - Sr. Adv., Mumbai - 25-7-2020 Jaipur - 26-7-2020 8-8-2020 9-8-2020 16-8-2020 Speakers at Various Webinars CA. Annapurna Srikanth Shri Kapil Goel, Adv., Shri V. P. Gupta, Adv., Shri Ajay R. Singh, Adv., CA. Dhinal Shah, CA. Rajesh Mehta, - 1-7-2020 New Delhi - 20-7-2020 New Delhi - 21-7-2020 Mumbai - 22-7-2020 Ahmedabad - 23-7-2020 Indore - 24-7-2020 CA. Paresh P. Shah, CA. Hetal N. Shah, CA. Bharat Sachdev, Shri N. P. Jain, Adv., CA. Deepabali Das, CA. A. K. Srivastava, Mumbai - 25-7-2020 Bengaluru - 25-7-2020 Thane - 25-7-2020 Kolkata - 26-7-2020 Tumakuru - 8-8-2020 New Delhi - 8-8-2020 Shri N. P. Jain, Adv., CA. Unnikrishnan M., CA. Sriram K., CA. (Dr.) Girish Ahuja, Smt. Nikita R. Badheka, Shri Samir Jani, Kolkata - 8-8-2020 Trivandrum - 9-8-2020 Hyderabad - 9-8-2020 New Delhi - 16-8-2020 National President Secretary General 2 C O N T E N T S Pg.
  • Revenue), Government of Tripura, Agartala

    Revenue), Government of Tripura, Agartala

    Page 1 of 54 HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA A_G_A_R_T_A_L_A RFA. No. 11 of 2015 1. The State of Tripura, represented by the Secretary (Revenue), Government of Tripura, Agartala. 2. The Secretary, to the Government of Tripura, Department of Information, Cultural Affairs & Tourism, Agartala. 3. The Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of Tripura, Agartala. 4. The District Magistrate & Collector, West Tripura, Agartala. …..Defendant-appellants -V E R S U S- 1. Smti. Bibhu Kumari Devi, wife of Lt. Kirit Bikram Kishore Debbarman. 2. Shri Pradyut Bikram Kishore Debbarman, son of late Kirit Bikram Kishore Debbarman, Both are residents of Palace Compound, Agartala, P.S. West Agartala, District: West Tripura. ….. Plaintiff-respondents B_E_F_O_R_E HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AKIL KURESHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM LODH For Appellant(s) : Mr. A. K. Bhowmik, A.G. Mr. D. Bhattacharjee, G.A. Mr. D. Chakraborty, Sr. Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. D. R. Chawdhury, Advocate. Mr. S. Sarkar, Advocate. Date of hearing : 25.11.2019 Date of judgment And order : 06.01.2020 Whether fit for reporting : YES Page 2 of 54 J_ U_ D_ G _M_ E_ N_ T (ARINDAM LODH, J) We have taken up the present civil appeal to determine the ownership of a monument, a proud edifies of the State of Tripura called „Nirmahal Palace‟ popularly known as „Rudrasagar‟ comprising of huge land and water body constructed by Lt. Maharaja Bir Bikram Kishore Manikya Bahadur which symbolises rich cultural heritage of the State. [2] The entire land is situated under Mouja-Rudijala and recorded under shabek khatian No.510 bearing CS plot No.1003, 1016/3317 and 1002 present khatian No.291, Hal plot No.1437,1439, 1440 and situated in a land measuring 6.01 acres described in details in the schedule of the plaint.
  • Government of India National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions

    Government of India National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions

    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR MINORITY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS CASE NO. 82 of 2019 22.1.2020 Shri Pratap Bhanu Jain Inter College, Sasni, Mahamaya Nagar, Hathras, District Hathras, Uttar Pradesh. Vs Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government of Uttar Pradesh. Present: Mr. Junais P., Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondent. Earlier on 26.9.2019, office was directed to submit proof of service of notice issued to the respondent. Office has failed to submit acknowledgment or tracking report. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after receiving notice of this Commission, State competent authority has called the petitioner and asked to submit some documents. In compliance of the order of the State competent authority, the petitioner has filed documents. These are verbal orders. In the light of above submission, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to file an affidavit. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to submit envelope and postage charges for sending notice to the State competent authority. After compliance of this order, office is directed to issue notice to the respondent. In the interest of justice, list on 22.7.2020. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN CHAIRMAN DR. NAHEED ABIDI MEMBER DR. JASPAL SINGH MEMBER MD GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR MINORITY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS CASE NO. 85 of 2019 22.1.2020 Shri Pratap Bhanu Jain Poorve Madhyamic Vidhyalaya, Shahpur Khurd, Block Sasni, Mahamaya Nagar, Hathras, District Hathras, Uttar Pradesh- 204 101. Vs Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government of Uttar Pradesh. Present: Mr. Junais P., Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondent.
  • E-Newsletters, Publicity Materials Etc

    E-Newsletters, Publicity Materials Etc

    DELHI SAHITYA AKADEMI TRANSLATION PRIZE PRESENTATION September 4-6, 2015, Dibrugarh ahitya Akademi organized its Translation Prize, 2014 at the Dibrugarh University premises on September 4-6, 2015. Prizes were presented on 4th, Translators’ Meet was held on 5th and Abhivyakti was held on S5th and 6th. Winners of Translation Prize with Ms. Pratibha Ray, Chief Guest, President and Secretary of Sahitya Akademi On 4th September, the first day of the event started at 5 pm at the Rang Ghar auditorium in Dibrugarh University. The Translation Prize, 2014 was held on the first day itself, where twenty four writers were awarded the Translation Prizes in the respective languages they have translated the literature into. Dr Vishwanath Prasad Tiwari, President, Sahitya Akademi, Eminent Odia writer Pratibha Ray was the chief guest, Guest of Honor Dr. Alak Kr Buragohain, Vice Chancellor, Dibrugarh University and Dr K. Sreenivasarao were present to grace the occasion. After the dignitaries addressed the gathering, the translation prizes were presented to the respective winners. The twenty four awardees were felicitated by a plaque, gamocha (a piece of cloth of utmost respect in the Assamese culture) and a prize of Rs.50, 000. The names of the twenty four winners of the translation prizes are • Bipul Deori won the Translation Prize in Assamese. • Benoy Kumar Mahanta won the Translation Prize in Bengali. • Surath Narzary won the Translation Prize in Bodo. • Yashpal ‘Nirmal’ won the Translation Prize in Dogri • Padmini Rajappa won the Translation Prize in English SAHITYA AKADEMI NEW S LETTER 1 DELHI • (Late) Nagindas Jivanlal Shah won the Translation Prize in Gujarati.