Geodetic Activities in Finland 2006 International Association of Geodesy (IAG)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geodetic Activities in Finland 2006 International Association of Geodesy (IAG) Geodetic activities in Finland 2006 International Association of Geodesy (IAG) Report for the IUGG National Committee, Compiled by Markku Poutanen Finnish Geodetic Institute (FGI) 1 Finnish Geodetic Institute 1.1 Reference frames and the permanent GPS network, FinnRef The Finnish Geodetic Institute hosts the permanent GPS network FinnRef, which consists of 13 permanent GPS stations. The network is the backbone of the Finnish realisation of the European reference system ETRS89. The National realisation of the reference frame is called EUREF-FIN. Connections to the neighboring countries and international networks, and maintaining of the reference frame are the responsibilities of the FGI. Four stations in the FinnRef network (Metsähovi, Vaasa, Joensuu, Sodankylä) belong to the EUREF permanent GNSS network (EPN), and one station (Metsähovi) belongs to the network of the International GNSS Service (IGS) of the IAG. Through these stations FinnRef creates a connection to the global reference frames and the stations are used for maintaining global reference frames and global geodetic studies. The data recorded in the EPN stations are transferred automatically hourly to the EPN regional data centres in Austria and Germany. The data are also transferred to the Onsala Space Observatory in Sweden for the BIFROST project. The FinnRef stations are also used for local studies on crustal movements as well as a reference for local and national GPS measurements. The absolute gravity observations were made at six GPS stations, viz. in Metsähovi, Vaasa, Joensuu, Sodankylä, Kuusamo and Kevo with FG5 gravimeter. Related to the IAGs project GGOS (Global Geodetic Observing System), the Nordic plan, NGOS (Nordic Geodetic Observing System) was continued as a task force of the Nordic Geodetic Commission. Markku Poutanen was the chairman of the task force, and a member of the GGOS steering committee. GGOS will be the most important geodetic effort in the coming years, and in NGOS the development of GGOS will be followed. Via GGOS geodetic data will be made available to the great public and researchers in a well controlled and uniform way. The Finnish Geodetic Institute (FGI) has participated in national committees and working groups in order to advance the usage and help in practical questions of the new reference frame, EUREF-FIN, in Finland. Also, several lectures and presentations were given. 1.2. Height systems The field work of the Third Precise Levelling of Finland, started in 1978, was completed in 2004. A total of more than 9000 km of double-run lines were measured, comprising more than 6000 benchmarks. Data were analysed, and a common Nordic adjustment was made on the network around the Baltic Sea to tie the national networks firmly into the European network. Based on the results of the adjustment, the new national height system N2000 was made following the guidelines of the European EVRS2000, and those agreed in the Nordic Geodetic Commission. N2000 will coincide with the new Swedish height system better than 2 mm at the border of Finland and Sweden in the valley of Tornio River. 1 The subcommission EUREF started in 2004 the project, which is called EUVN_DA (European Unified Vertical Network Densification Action). The purpose of the project is to densify the GPS/Levelling network in Europe so that the distance between the neighbouring stations will be less than 100 km. The minimum GPS observation time at a point should be at least 24 hours, and the point should be connected by precise levelling to the closest nodal point of the UELN network. A total of 30 GPS/levelling points were measured in Finland in 2005. The results were presented to the EUREF commission in the annual meeting in Riga and published in the series of the FGI. One connection to the Russian border was levelled in 2006 thus completing the project of measuring connections over the Finnish-Russian border. Joint publication of the project was published in the series of the FGI. 1.3. Gravimetric works 1.3.1 Absolute gravimetry In December-January 2005/2006, FGI performed absolute gravity measurements at the Finnish Antarctic base Aboa with the FG5-221. Previously, FGI had measured at Aboa in 1994, 2001 and 2004. Repeated measurements are used for geodynamical studies. Single occupations provide reference values for gravity surveys. Repeated measurements were made also at the South-African Sanae IV, and the Russian Station Novolazarevskaya. The Nordic Absolute Gravity Project was launched in 2003. It aims at producing a time series of absolute gravity measurements at about 20 Nordic sites. The time series will be compared with estimates of regional mantle inflow (due to the Fennoscandian postglacial rebound) obtained from the ongoing mission of the GRACE gravity satellite. As a by- product, a highly accurate gravity reference network with estimates of gravity change rates will be produced. The absolute measurements are performed by IfE (Institut für Erdmessung, University of Hannover), Norwegian University of Life Sciences, BKG (Bundesamt für Kartografie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt), and FGI, in cooperation with the Danish Space Center, the Norwegian Mapping Authority, and Lantmäteriet (Sweden). In 2006 FGI observed at 7 sites. The project is coordinated by the Working Group for Geodynamics of the Nordic Geodetic Commission (NKG), as a part of the Nordic Geodetic Observing System (NGOS) of the NKG. A comparison between IfE (Institute für Erdmessung, University of Hannover, Germany) and FGI gravimeters took place in Metsähovi. At Metsähovi the gravity is measured regularly, and fhe absolute gravity has been observed in Metsähovi more than 80 times since 1988. 1.3.2 Relative gravimetry Studies on the Keurusselkä impact structure in Central-West Finland were continued by detailed analyse of the 2005 gravity survey. Measured four gravity profiles (NS, EW, NE- SW,NW-SE) and densification of the gravity net of the Finnish Geodetic Institute reveal a Bouguer anomaly minimum in the impact area and there exists a small local anomaly maximum in the shatter cone area. The size of impact structure is still unknown and new gravity measurements are needed for investigation of the structure details. The studies on the Keurusselkä impact structure continue also by comparing gravity anomaly result with other geophysical investigations (FIRE-seismic, magnetic, petrophysical, topography etc.) in cooperation with the Solid Earth Geophysics section of the Department of Physical Sciences in the University of Helsinki. 2 1.3.3 Superconducting gravimetry The superconducting gravimeter GWR T020 at Metsähovi has been operational since August 1994. It participates in the GGP (Global geodynamics project), where 20 SG’s are deployed worldwide. In addition to the gravity data, the recordings consist of air pressure, groundwater level and precipitation. Studies of gravity data comprise the gravity spectrum from microseism to Chandlerian period. The research work has been focused on loading effects from air pressure field and the Baltic Sea. Use of the superconducting gravimeter for hydrological studies is investigated in cooperation with the Helsinki University of Technology (Department of Rock Engineering), Finnish Environment Institute, and the Geological Survey of Finland. Modelling of the Influence of Atmospheric Masses and Baltic Sea Level on Gravity in cooperation with the Finnish Meteorological Institute and the Finnish Institute of Marine Research continued. The detailed HIRLAM (High Resolution Limited Area Model) air pressure grid gives gravity correction models that during special events like the passage of strong anticyclones differ up to 10 nm s –2 from simple regression models. This improves the detection and modelling of signals correlated with air pressure, e.g. Baltic Sea level variations. Hydrological loading effects were calculated using both the high accurate model for Finland (Watershed Simulation and forecasting System, WSFS, by the Finnish Environment Institute) and the Climate Prediction Center global soil moisture data set (CPC). Results were compared and evaluated with SG and local permanent GPS observations. FGI participated in global and European studies where the variation in surface gravity observed point wise with the SGs is correlated with variation in regional gravity observed with the satellites CHAMP and GRACE, and with the variation in regional gravity predicted from global models of terrestrial water storage. One Doctoral Thesis on the topic was completed in 2006. 1.3.4 Satellite gravimetry GRACE time series were analysed and compared with time series from the superconducting gravimeter in Metsähovi. Furthermore, surface mass variations were estimated from the GRACE time series and they were compared with variations in global watershed models and the Finnish Watershed Simulation and Forecasting System of the Finnish Environment Institute. Good correlations were found. 1.3.5 Geoid models Work was done to calculate two new geoid models for Finland based on the new Nordic geoid model, NKG2004, and a new network of GPS and levelling data. The first model is for use with the old height system and the second with the new height system. Both models will be published in 2007 when the new height system for Finland is introduced. 1.4. The Metsähovi Research station The Metsähovi research station was founded in 1978 and it has through the years become an essential part of the activities of the FGI. Currently, it is globally one of the most versatile space geodetic station. The instrumentation
Recommended publications
  • Wastewater Treatment in Antarctica
    Wastewater Treatment in Antarctica Sergey Tarasenko Supervisor: Neil Gilbert GCAS 2008/2009 Table of content Acronyms ...........................................................................................................................................3 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................4 1 Basic principles of wastewater treatment for small objects .....................................................5 1.1 Domestic wastewater characteristics....................................................................................5 1.2 Characteristics of main methods of domestic wastewater treatment .............................5 1.3 Designing of treatment facilities for individual sewage disposal systems...................11 2 Wastewater treatment in Antarctica..........................................................................................13 2.1 Problems of transferring treatment technologies to Antarctica .....................................13 2.1.1 Requirements of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty / Wastewater quality standards ...................................................................................................13 2.1.2 Geographical situation......................................................................................................14 2.1.2.1 Climatic conditions....................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Station Sharing in Antarctica
    IP 94 Agenda Item: ATCM 7, ATCM 10, ATCM 11, ATCM 14, CEP 5, CEP 6b, CEP 9 Presented by: ASOC Original: English Station Sharing in Antarctica 1 IP 94 Station Sharing in Antarctica Information Paper Submitted by ASOC to the XXIX ATCM (CEP Agenda Items 5, 6 and 9, ATCM Agenda Items 7, 10, 11 and 14) I. Introduction and overview As of 2005 there were at least 45 permanent stations in the Antarctic being operated by 18 countries, of which 37 were used as year-round stations.i Although there are a few examples of states sharing scientific facilities (see Appendix 1), for the most part the practice of individual states building and operating their own facilities, under their own flags, persists. This seems to be rooted in the idea that in order to become a full Antarctic Treaty Consultative Party (ATCP), one has to build a station to show seriousness of scientific purpose, although formally the ATCPs have clarified that this is not the case. The scientific mission and international scientific cooperation is nominally at the heart of the ATS,ii and through SCAR the region has a long-established scientific coordination body. It therefore seems surprising that half a century after the adoption of this remarkable Antarctic regime, we still see no truly international stations. The ‘national sovereign approach’ continues to be the principal driver of new stations. Because new stations are likely to involve relatively large impacts in areas that most likely to be near pristine, ASOC submits that this approach should be changed. In considering environmental impact analyses of proposed new station construction, the Committee on Environmental Protection (CEP) presently does not have a mandate to take into account opportunities for sharing facilities (as an alternative that would reduce impacts).
    [Show full text]
  • CCN Measurements at the Princess Elisabeth Antarctica Research
    bs CCN measurements at the Princess Elisabeth Antarctica Research Station during three austral summers Paul Herenz1, Heike Wex1, Alexander Mangold2, Quentin Laffineur2, Irina V. Gorodetskaya3,4, Zoë L. Fleming5, Marios Panagi5, and Frank Stratmann1 1Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Leipzig, Germany 2Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium, Brussels, Belgium 3Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Physics, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal 4Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium 5National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Department of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK Correspondence to: Heike Wex ([email protected]) Abstract. For three austral summer seasons (2013-2016, each from December to February) aerosol particles arriving at the Belgian Antarctic research station Princess Elisabeth (PE), in Dronning Maud Land in East Antarctica were characterized. in terms 5 ofThis included number concentrations of total aerosol particles (NCN) and cloud condensation nuclei (NCCN), the particle number size distribution (PNSD), the aerosol particle hygroscopicity and the influence of the air mass origin on NCN and −3 −3 NCCN. In general NCN was found to range from 40 to 6700 cm with a median of 333 cm , while NCCN was found to cover a range between less than 10 and 1300 cm−3 for supersaturations (SS) between 0.1 and 0.7 %. It is shown that the aerosol is Aitken mode dominated and is , being characterized by a significant amount of freshly, small, and therefore likely secondarily
    [Show full text]
  • Report for the IUGG National Committee, International Association of Geodesy (IAG) Geodetic Activities in Finland 2004
    Report for the IUGG National Committee, International Association of Geodesy (IAG) Geodetic activities in Finland 2004 Compiled by Markku Poutanen Finnish Geodetic Institute (FGI) 1. The permanent GPS network FinnRef The Finnish Geodetic Institute hosts the permanent GPS network FinnRef which consists of 13 permanent GPS stations. The network is the backbone of the Finnish realisation of the European-wide reference frame EUREF, referred as to EUREF-FIN. Four stations in the FinnRef network belong to the EUREF permanent GPS-network (EPN), and one station belongs to the network of the International GPS Service (IGS). Through these stations FinnRef creates a connection to the global reference frames and the stations are used for maintaining global reference frames and global geodetic studies. The data recorded in the EPS stations (Metsähovi, Vaasa, Joensuu, Sodankylä) are transferred automatically to the EPN data centre in Germany. The data are also transferred daily to the Onsala Space Research Station in Sweden for the BIFROST project. Data download from four Euref-stations were changed to hourly basis at the end of 2004. In 2005 the hourly data delivery is planned. The FinnRef is also used for local studies on crustal movements as well as a reference for local and national GPS measurements. Determination of land uplift, but also studies on periodic effects on data, as well as deformation studies due to loading effects have been made using the permanent network. The absolute gravity observations were made at three GPS stations, viz. in Metsähovi, Vaasa and Joensuu with FG5 gravimeter. The absolute gravity has been observed in Metsähovi more than 80 times since 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness and Aesthetic Values of Antarctica
    Wilderness and Aesthetic Values of Antarctica Abstract Antarctica is the least inhabited region in the world and has therefore had the least influence from human activities and, unlike the majority of the Earth’s continents and oceans, can still be considered as mostly wilderness. As every visitor to Antarctica knows, its landscapes are exceptionally beautiful. It was the recognition of the importance of these characteristics that resulted in their protection being included in the Madrid Protocol. Both wilderness and aesthetic values can be impaired by human activities in a variety of ways with the severity varying from negligible to severe, according to the type Protocol on Environmental Protec tion to the Antarctic Trea ty - of activity and its duration, spatial extent and intensity. A map of infrastructure and major travel routes the "M adrid Protocol" in Antarctica will be the first step in visually representing where wilderness and aesthetic values Article 3[1] may be impacted. It is hoped that this will stimulate further discussion on how to describe, acknowledge, The protection of the Antarctic environment and dependent an d associated ecosystems and the intrinsic value of Antarctica, understand and further protect the wilderness and aesthetic values of Antarctica. including its wilderness and aesthetic values and its value as an area for the conduct of scientific research, in particular research essential to understanding the global environment, shall be fundamental considerations in the planning and condu ct of all activities
    [Show full text]
  • Informe Final De La Cuadragésima Reunión Consultiva Del Tratado Antártico
    Informe Final de la Cuadragésima Reunión Consultiva del Tratado Antártico REUNIÓN CONSULTIVA DEL TRATADO ANTÁRTICO Informe Final de la Cuadragésima Reunión Consultiva del Tratado Antártico Pekín, China 22 de mayo - 1 de junio de 2017 Volumen I Secretaría del Tratado Antártico Buenos Aires 2017 Publicado por: Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Secrétariat du Traité sur l’ Antarctique Секретариат Договора об Антарктике Secretaría del Tratado Antártico Maipú 757, Piso 4 C1006ACI Ciudad Autónoma Buenos Aires - Argentina Tel: +54 11 4320 4260 Fax: +54 11 4320 4253 Este libro también está disponible en: www.ats.aq (versión digital) y para compras en línea. ISSN 2346-9889 ISBN (vol. I): 978-987-4024-47-3 ISBN (obra completa): 978-987-4024-44-2 Índice VOLUMEN I Siglas y abreviaciones 9 PARTE I. INFORME FINAL 11 1. Informe Final de la XL RCTA 13 2. Informe de la XX Reunión del CPA 133 3. Apéndices 233 Apéndice 1: Programa preliminar, Grupos de Trabajo y asignación de temas para la XLI RCTA 235 Apéndice 2: Comunicado del País Anfi trión 237 PARTE II. MEDIDAS, DECISIONES Y RESOLUCIONES 239 1. Medidas 241 Medida 1 (2017): Zona Antártica Especialmente Protegida n.° 109 (Isla Moe, islas Orcadas del Sur): Plan de Gestión revisado 243 Medida 2 (2017): Zona Antártica Especialmente Protegida n.° 110 (Isla Lynch, islas Orcadas del Sur): Plan de Gestión revisado 245 Medida 3 (2017): Zona Antártica Especialmente Protegida n.° 111 (Isla Powell del Sur e islas adyacentes, islas Orcadas del Sur): Plan de Gestión revisado 247 Medida 4 (2017): Zona Antártica Especialmente
    [Show full text]
  • GPS Observations for Ice Sheet History (GOFISH)
    GPS Observations for Ice Sheet History (GOFISH) WASA/ABOA and SVEA stations, East Antarctica December 2001-January 2002 Dan Zwartz, Michiel Helsen Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht University, The Netherlands Contents List of acronyms 2 Map of Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica 3 Introduction 4 GPS Observations for Ice Sheet History (GOFISH) Travel itinerary 5 Expedition timetable 8 GPS geodesy Snow sample programme 12 Glacial geology 18 Weather Stations Maintenance 19 Acknowledgements 20 References 21 Front cover. View on Scharffenbergbotnen in the Heimefrontfjella, near the Swedish field station Svea, East Antarctica (photo by M. Helsen). 1 List of acronyms ABL Atmospheric Boundary Layer AWS Automatic Weather Station CIO Centre for Isotope Research (Groningen University) DML Dronning Maud Land ENABLE EPICA-Netherlands Atmospheric Boundary Layer Experiment EPICA European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica GISP Greenland Ice Sheet Project GPS Global Positioning System GRIP Greenland Ice Coring Project GTS Global Telecommunication System GOFISH GPS Observations for Ice Sheet History HM Height Meter (stand-alone sonic height ranger) IMAU Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research (Utrecht University) m asl Meters above mean sea level KNMI Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute NWO Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research SL (Atmospheric) Surface Layer (lowest 10% of the ABL) VU Free University of Amsterdam w.e. water equivalents 2 Map of Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica 10°5°0°5°10° 69° FIMFIMBUL
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Composition of Boundary Layer Aerosol Over the Atlantic Ocean and at an Antarctic Site
    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3407–3421, 2006 www.atmos-chem-phys.net/6/3407/2006/ Atmospheric © Author(s) 2006. This work is licensed Chemistry under a Creative Commons License. and Physics Chemical composition of boundary layer aerosol over the Atlantic Ocean and at an Antarctic site A. Virkkula1, K. Teinila¨1, R. Hillamo1, V.-M. Kerminen1, S. Saarikoski1, M. Aurela1, J. Viidanoja2, J. Paatero1, I. K. Koponen3, and M. Kulmala4 1Finnish Meteorological Institute, Erik Palmenin´ aukio, 00560, Helsinki, Finland 2Department Department of Chemistry, Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry,University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland 3University of Copenhagen, Department of Chemistry, Universitetsparken 5, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 4Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Aerosol and Environmental Physics Laboratory, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland Received: 5 October 2005 – Published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.: 10 January 2006 Revised: 2 June 2006 – Accepted: 16 June 2006 – Published: 21 August 2006 Abstract. Aerosol chemical composition was measured over 1 Introduction the Atlantic Ocean in November–December 1999 and at the Finnish Antarctic research station Aboa in January 2000. Large amounts of man-made and natural aerosols are trans- The concentrations of all anthropogenic aerosol compounds ported every year from the continents over the ocean decreased clearly from north to south. An anthropogenic in- (Lelieveld et al., 2001; Kaufman et al., 2002; Chiapello fluence was still evident in the middle of the tropical South and Moulin, 2002). In the marine environment, these Atlantic, background values were reached south of Cape continentally-derived aerosols influence the climate forc- Town. Chemical mass apportionment was calculated for high ing patterns by scattering and absorbing solar radiation and volume filter samples (Dp<3µm).
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Republic of Germany Antarctic Treaty
    FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY ANTARCTIC TREATY EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION UNDER ARTICLES III (1) AND VII (5) FOR 2008 - 2009 Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs Berlin March 2009 1 2. ANNUAL REPORT (01 October 2007 – 30 September 2008).........................................................................3 2.1 Scientific Information...................................................................................................................................3 2.1.1 Forward Plans ......................................................................................................................................3 2.1.2 Science Activities in the previous year (01 October 2007 – 30 September 2008)...............................3 2.2 Operational Information ........................................................................................................................... 20 2.2.1 National Expeditions.......................................................................................................................... 20 2.3 Permit Information.................................................................................................................................... 54 2.3.1 Visits to Protected Areas................................................................................................................... 54 2.3.2 Taking and harmful interference with flora and fauna....................................................................... 54 2.3.3 Introduction of non-native species ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Are More Antarctic Stations Justified?
    XXVII ATCM ATCM INFORMATION PAPER MARCH 2004 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH AGENDA ITEM 14 ARE MORE ANTARCTIC STATIONS JUSTIFIED? Submitted to the XXVII ATCM by the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition Are More Antarctic Stations Justified? I. INTRODUCTION At least five new Antarctic national stations are currently proposed or planned (Belgium, Czech Republic, Estonia, India and South Korea) (Table I). Other significant infrastructure projects currently underway include substantial upgrades of existing national stations, the development of air links to various locations in Antarctica and related runways, and an ice road to the South Pole. These developments occur in a context of at least 73 established stations (whether full year or summer only), maintained by 26 States already operating in the Antarctic Treaty Area.1 As a whole, the pattern of new station activity does not obviously correlate with new and significant scientific research in previously poorly known parts of Antarctica. If this is so, what is driving the new station activity in Antarctica, is it necessary or desirable, and what alternatives might there be? II. WHAT IS DRIVING THE NEW STATION ACTIVITY IN ANTARCTICA? Many previous drivers of national interests in Antarctica either seemingly no longer apply or do not carry the same importance as they once did in previous eras of Antarctic exploration and expansion. Chief among these would be territorial and sovereignty claims and minerals prospecting. The agreements made within the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) to freeze territorial claims and the 50-year moratorium on mining would make these unlikely new motivations, at least as long as the status quo remains.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Monitoring at Swedish Research Stations in Antarctica
    Environmental Monitoring at Swedish Research Stations in Antarctica Caroline Watier Master of Science Thesis Stockholm 2008 Caroline Watier Environmental Monitoring at Swedish Research Stations in Antarctica Supervisor & Examiner: Fredrik Gröndahl Master of Science Thesis STOCKHOLM 2008 PRESENTED AT INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY TRITA-IM 2008:03 ISSN 1402-7615 Industrial Ecology, Royal Institute of Technology www.ima.kth.se Environmental Monitoring at Swedish Research Stations in Antarctica Caroline Watier Master of Science Thesis Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden Department of Industrial Ecology 2008 Supervisor: Johan Sidenmark, Environmental Officer Swedish Polar Research Secretariat Examiner: Fredrick Gröndahl Department of Industrial Ecology, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan Swedish Polar Research Secretariat Polarforskningssekretariatet This master thesis is written in cooperation with the Swedish Polar Research Secretariat for SWEDARP, Swedish Antarctic Research Program Environmental Monitoring in Antarctica Acknowledgement This thesis has been going on during 20 weeks during the autumn 2007 semester. It is the conclusive project in the double degree at the Department of Industrial Ecology at Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan (Stockholm, Sweden) and at the Ecole Centrale Marseille (Marseille, France). I would like to express my deepest thanks to the following people for their support during this thesis: My supervisor, Johan Sidenmark, Environmental Officer at the Swedish Polar Research Secretariat for his precious help
    [Show full text]
  • Polar Shifts Sweden and the International Polar Year 2007–2008 Polar Shift S ❄ 
    Polar Shifts Sweden and the International Polar Year 2007–2008 POLAR SHIFT S ❄ 1 Photo: Peter Rosén/Scanpix The International Polar Year 2007–2008 has been a foundations for radical breakthroughs in knowledge, great success. Scientists from across the globe have something that happens infrequently but when it come together to perform work that is of great impor- does, it opens up completely new perspectives for our tance to our common future. The polar regions are world. crucial to the entire planet. But obviously they are The Polar Year has demonstrated that polar even more important to the people who inhabit them. research connects Sweden and Lapland with the part I’m glad that Sweden has been an active par of the Arctic that lies further north – and also with ticipant in the International Polar Year, and that the Antarctic, where many Swedish scientists have Swedish scientists have been working on research been working during the Polar Year. projects within all the scientific disciplines, from Collaboration between the Sami population and social sciences and the humanities to medicine and researchers has been deeper during the Polar Year natural sciences. Along with 63 other countries our than previously. The unique knowledge of the local scientists have contributed to increasing the knowl- population has been utilized and research has to a edge of the and thereby our entire planet. greater extent taken place in communities where I’m proud of the long-standing Swedish tradition people live and work, in cooperation with the Sami of polar research. Early research and continuous data communities and other local residents.
    [Show full text]